Post on 24-Feb-2016
description
transcript
DT Barrel Alignment Using Standalone Muon Tracks
Luca ScodellaroMuon Barrel Workshop
February 24th, 2011
2
Outline• Brief remind of the methods• MC analysis set up• Reconstructing barrel geometry: ◊ Sectors ◊ Sector connection ◊ Wheels ◊ Whole barrel• Final remarks
3
Brief Remind of the Method
4
Standalone Geometry with Tracks• Hardware alignment close to its design precision• Alignment with respect to the tracker might suffer
for several effects: ◊ Tracker misalign., B field, material description• Exploring a third source of information: SA tracks• Millipede approach based on a linear
approximation of residuals: R = B∆p + Aδ• B matrix hard to describe in a non-uniform
magnetic field
5
Standalone Geometry with Tracks• Trying an approach based on DT segments: ◊ Selecting tracks with pT>50 GeV/c ◊ For small movements, we can assume ∆p to depend only on chamber movements B ∆p = ACδinit = A’δfinal ◊ Simplified χ2 minimization
6
MC Analysis Set Up
7
Studies on MC• We want to understand the sensitivity we can
reach on ideal MC • MC sample: ◊ CosmicMC_BON_10GeV_22X_V6_MuAlStandalone• Using 1Leg tracks used to improve pT
measurements ◊ Same performances with 2Leg tracks and 2
iterations• The idea is to start from HW based alignment• A misalignment scenario has been generated by
smearing ideal positions (local frame) by: ◊ Center of the chamber: 400 μm ◊ Orientation: 400 μrad
8
Validation of the Fits• We reconstruct objects (sectors, wheel,
etc.) in a standalone way • When comparing two geometries for an
object, we look at the local coordinate of each chamber in a geometry in the reference system of the same chamber in the other geometry
• The global transformation which minimize these coordinates is computed
• Resulting local coordinates are presented
9
Reconstructing Sectors
10
Chamber to Chamber Fit• Residual distribution for YB0, Sector 10, Station
2Misaligned geometryCorrected geometry (1 iter.)
11
Chamber to Chamber Performance• Performance in chamber alignment vs. number
of segments used
12
Sector Recontruction Performance• Distance of chamber position from ideal
geometry
13
Sector Recontruction Performance• Performance in sector alignment vs number of
segments in the chamber with lowest statistics
14
Sector Connection
15
Sector Connection Strategies• All chamber to chamber approach (All
C2C): ◊ Treat all chamber separately ◊ Compute at the same time internal sector
structure and sector relative position ◊ Alignment matrix A is 20x36
• Sector to sector approach (S2S): ◊ Froze sector structure ◊ Fit relative sector position by using segments from crossing tracks ◊ Alignment matrix A is 20x6
16
Sector Connection Performance• Sector connection performance for All C2C and
S2S:
17
Sector Connection Performance• Sector connection performance with All C2C vs
number of segments in the chamber with highest statistics
18
Reconstructing Wheels
19
Wheel Reconstruction• WheelS2S: using S2S strategy and fitting all
sectors in a wheel together (A~172x258)
20
Wheel Reconstruction• Details on the performance in local Y for subsets of
sectors (all wheel was fitted)
Sectors Mean ΔY Mis. (μm)
RMS ΔY Mis. (μm)
Mean ΔY Algn. (μm)
RMS Δ Y Algn. (μm)
2 to 6 -12 286 6 1518 to 12 39 258 -18 1485 to 9 24 235 10 2556 t0 8 14 196 -11 22511 to 3 28 280 -21 25312 to 2 14 217 -1 177
21
Wheel Reconstruction• Sector connection comparison for S2S and
WheelS2S• WheelS2S connect the sectors as S2S (no
degradation)
22
Reconstructing Whole Barrel
23
Barrel Reconstruction• Wheel2Wheel: same strategy as for WheelS2S but
using frozen wheels instead of frozen sectors
24
Final Remarks• Studies of standalone barrel alignment with MC
cosmics basically complete• Testing on data ongoing: ◊ Cosmics first: low statistics for certain barrel region,
and ttrig not optimal ◊ Collisions data: better ttrig, better relative statistics
between sector/wheel, no as much muon with high pT, no 1leg tracks
◊ Could use different datasets for each alignment step
25
Backup Material
26
Sector Recontruction Performance• Sector reconstruction with 1 leg tracks and 2 leg
(2 iterations) tracks
27
Chamber to Chamber Performance• Performance in the alignment of chambers
between sectors
28
Distribution of Segments in Cosmics
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Sectors
Whe
els
29
Sector Connection Performance• Sector connection performance for All C2C and
S2S strategies
30
Distribution of Segments in Cosmics
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Sectors
Whe
els