Post on 24-Mar-2020
transcript
DURABILITY ASSESSMENT OF CONSOLIDATION EFFECT ON SANDSTONE MONUMENTS
Marco Ludovico-Marques (IPS/ESTB)Carlos Chastre (FCT/UNL)
41th
IAH
S W
OR
LD C
ON
GR
ESS
ON
HO
USI
NG
SUST
AIN
ABIL
ITYA
ND
INN
OVA
TIO
N F
OR
TH
E FU
TUR
EO
S –
Exp
erim
enta
l Res
earc
h on
Bui
ldin
g R
ehab
ilita
tion
DEGRADATION PATTERNS ON THE SANDSTONE
WALLS OF ST. LEONARD’S CHURCH
40th
IAH
S W
OR
LD C
ON
GR
ESS
ON
HO
USI
NG
SUST
AIN
BLE
HO
USI
NG
CO
NST
RU
CTI
ON
TS 1
1 –
Sus
tain
able
Reh
abili
tatio
n w
ith E
mer
ging
Mat
eria
ls a
nd S
yste
ms
Five types of stone deterioration patterns(ICOMOS-ICS glossary):
Crack & deformation
Detachment
Features induced by material loss
Discoloration & deposit
Biological colonization.
41th
IAH
S W
OR
LD C
ON
GR
ESS
ON
HO
USI
NG
SUST
AIN
ABIL
ITYA
ND
INN
OVA
TIO
N F
OR
TH
E FU
TUR
EO
S –
Exp
erim
enta
l Res
earc
h on
Bui
ldin
g R
ehab
ilita
tion
INTRODUCTION
St. Leonard's Medieval Church40th
IAH
S W
OR
LD C
ON
GR
ESS
ON
HO
USI
NG
SUST
AIN
BLE
HO
USI
NG
CO
NST
RU
CTI
ON
TS 1
1 –
Sus
tain
able
Reh
abili
tatio
n w
ith E
mer
ging
Mat
eria
ls a
nd S
yste
ms INTRODUCTION
41th
IAH
S W
OR
LD C
ON
GR
ESS
ON
HO
USI
NG
SUST
AIN
ABIL
ITYA
ND
INN
OVA
TIO
N F
OR
TH
E FU
TUR
EO
S –
Exp
erim
enta
l Res
earc
h on
Bui
ldin
g R
ehab
ilita
tion
EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME
• Four varieties of sandstones (A, B, C, M).
• Lithic arkose with carbonate cement according to Folk (1974).
• The varieties C and M have around 20-25% carbonates and 40-51% quartz.
MINERALOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION
PREPARATION OF SPECIMENS• Samples were extracted from stone masonry walls close to
the built heritage.• Similarity to the stones in the monuments: appearance,
mineralogical composition, texture and structure.• Specimen sizes: 5x5x5 [cm] and 5x5x10 [cm]
41th
IAH
S W
OR
LD C
ON
GR
ESS
ON
HO
USI
NG
SUST
AIN
ABIL
ITYA
ND
INN
OVA
TIO
N F
OR
TH
E FU
TUR
EO
S –
Exp
erim
enta
l Res
earc
h on
Bui
ldin
g R
ehab
ilita
tion
CONSOLIDATING PRODUCTS
. Treatment of stones were carried out in a laboratory environment and in the monument
. Evaluation of the viability of two ethyl silicate consolidating products on stones:
Tegovakon V (TG) and Redur 420 (R)
. Selection criteria: commercial availability and reasonable costs.
. TG is produced by Goldschmidt in a single component(Before application: unit weight of 0.95±0.02 g/cm3 at 25ºCAfter application: dry residue of 34% after evaporationof solvents at 20ºC and 60% of RH).
. R is manufactured by Promasil in a single component(Before application: unit weight of 0.83±0.02 g/cm3After application: dry residue of 17% after evaporationof solvents at 20ºC and 60% of RH).
EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME41
thIA
HS
WO
RLD
CO
NG
RES
S O
N H
OU
SIN
GSU
STAI
NAB
ILIT
YAN
D IN
NO
VATI
ON
FO
R T
HE
FUTU
RE
OS
–E
xper
imen
tal R
esea
rch
on B
uild
ing
Reh
abili
tatio
n
CONSOLIDATION PROCEDURES
. 5 cm-long cubic samples.
. Applications step by step by immersion and capillarity over all stone mass (Ludovico-Marques, 2008).
.The amounts of absorbed products were around 5% of mass content in variety M.
. Drying at at room temperature and RH of Laboratory (Civil Engineering Department of FCT-UNL).
. A dry residue of about 40% of TG and 25% of R after evaporationof solvents during 8 weeks.
. Capillarity procedure was followed on samples used to carryout drying tests. Capillarity height reached 2.5 cm and theamounts of absorbed products were around 3% of mass content.
EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME41
thIA
HS
WO
RLD
CO
NG
RES
S O
N H
OU
SIN
GSU
STAI
NAB
ILIT
YAN
D IN
NO
VATI
ON
FO
R T
HE
FUTU
RE
OS
–E
xper
imen
tal R
esea
rch
on B
uild
ing
Reh
abili
tatio
n
PROCEDURES FOR PHYSICAL TESTS
• Porosity and density on sandstone samples following the Recommendations of RILEM (1980) and EN1936 (1999).
• Four varieties samples exhibit similar values of porosity to the historical building stones, ranging from 3.6% (variety A) to 12.7% (variety C) and 18.5% (variety M).
• Pore size distribution of sandstone varieties M was obtained by mercury intrusion porosimetry. Microporosity settled as the percentage of pores radii lower than 7,5 μm (Pellerin, 1980), is 75-81% in variety M.
• Drying tests were carried out on top face of sandstonecubic samples of variety M before and after treatments,following the Recommendations of NORMAL 29/88 (1991)and RILEM (1980) at laboratory environment of 20 ± 2 º Cand 55 ± 10% of RH.
• RILEM (1980) water absorption under low pressure testprocedure was carried out on prismatic and cubicsandstone samples. After consolidation treatments wasonly applied on cubic samples.
EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME41
thIA
HS
WO
RLD
CO
NG
RES
S O
N H
OU
SIN
GSU
STAI
NAB
ILIT
YAN
D IN
NO
VATI
ON
FO
R T
HE
FUTU
RE
OS
–E
xper
imen
tal R
esea
rch
on B
uild
ing
Reh
abili
tatio
n
The uniaxial compression tests on the sandstones used aSeidner servo-controlled press, model 3000D:
• Load capacity up to 3000kN and a piston stroke of 50 mm.
• Tests carried out under axial displacement control at a rateof 10 mm/s on cubic specimens of variety M.
EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME
PROCEDURES FOR MECHANICAL TESTS
41th
IAH
S W
OR
LD C
ON
GR
ESS
ON
HO
USI
NG
SUST
AIN
ABIL
ITYA
ND
INN
OVA
TIO
N F
OR
TH
E FU
TUR
EO
S –
Exp
erim
enta
l Res
earc
h on
Bui
ldin
g R
ehab
ilita
tion
• Crystallization tests by total immersion were carried outfollowing RILEM V.1a, b, V.2 (1980) [6] and EN 12370 [10],replacing sodium sulphate solutions by sodium chloridesolutions.
• Salt crystallization-dissolution ageing tests were carriedout in an automatic ageing chamber prototype.
EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMMEPROCEDURES FOR DURABILITY TESTS
41th
IAH
S W
OR
LD C
ON
GR
ESS
ON
HO
USI
NG
SUST
AIN
ABIL
ITYA
ND
INN
OVA
TIO
N F
OR
TH
E FU
TUR
EO
S –
Exp
erim
enta
l Res
earc
h on
Bui
ldin
g R
ehab
ilita
tion
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME
PHYSICAL BEHAVIOUR (DI)
41th
IAH
S W
OR
LD C
ON
GR
ESS
ON
HO
USI
NG
SUST
AIN
ABIL
ITYA
ND
INN
OVA
TIO
N F
OR
TH
E FU
TUR
EO
S –
Exp
erim
enta
l Res
earc
h on
Bui
ldin
g R
ehab
ilita
tion
0
5
10
0 500 1000 1500
Moi
stur
e co
nten
t (%
)
M27TG, M42TG, M23TG, M26TG, M29TG, M6TG
t (h)
M103,106,104,105,107,108
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 500 1000 1500t (h)
Moi
stur
e co
nten
t (%
)
M103,106,104,105,107,108
M47R, M57R, M53R, M61R, M51R, M64R
VarietyDrying Index
Average ± SD (CV %)
M 0.10 ± 0.01 (9.80)
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME
Consolidatingproduct
Drying Index
Average ± SD (CV %)
TG 0.12 ± 0.01 (8.33)
R 0.11 ± 0.01 (9.09)
Minor increase
20% on TG
10% on R
PHYSICAL BEHAVIOUR (DI)
41th
IAH
S W
OR
LD C
ON
GR
ESS
ON
HO
USI
NG
SUST
AIN
ABIL
ITYA
ND
INN
OVA
TIO
N F
OR
TH
E FU
TUR
EO
S –
Exp
erim
enta
l Res
earc
h on
Bui
ldin
g R
ehab
ilita
tion
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME
PHYSICAL BEHAVIOUR (k)
41th
IAH
S W
OR
LD C
ON
GR
ESS
ON
HO
USI
NG
SUST
AIN
ABIL
ITYA
ND
INN
OVA
TIO
N F
OR
TH
E FU
TUR
EO
S –
Exp
erim
enta
l Res
earc
h on
Bui
ldin
g R
ehab
ilita
tion
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
100 10 20 30 40 50 60
)s(t)mkg( SmΔ 2
M26
TG
M6T
GM
27T
GM
26T
G
M47
R
M51
RM
61R
M57
R
)h(t
M10
6,10
8M
104
MP2
,3,4
M10
5, M
P5
M10
3,10
7
MP1
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME
PHYSICAL BEHAVIOUR (k)
41th
IAH
S W
OR
LD C
ON
GR
ESS
ON
HO
USI
NG
SUST
AIN
ABIL
ITYA
ND
INN
OVA
TIO
N F
OR
TH
E FU
TUR
EO
S –
Exp
erim
enta
l Res
earc
h on
Bui
ldin
g R
ehab
ilita
tion
Con
solid
ants
Water absorption coefficient, k (kg/m2/√h)Average ± SD (CV %)
NT 24.0 ± 1.6 (6.8)
TG 12.6 ± 1.0 (8.2)
R 20.9 ± 1.9 (8.8)
Significant decrease
48% on TG
13% on R
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMMEDURABILITY ASSESSMENT BY SALT
CRYSTALLIZATION DISSOLUTION ARTIFICIAL AGEING TESTS
After 60 salt cycles the average mass loss of sandstone samples is about 8%
41th
IAH
S W
OR
LD C
ON
GR
ESS
ON
HO
USI
NG
SUST
AIN
ABIL
ITYA
ND
INN
OVA
TIO
N F
OR
TH
E FU
TUR
EO
S –
Exp
erim
enta
l Res
earc
h on
Bui
ldin
g R
ehab
ilita
tion
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60Nc
Dm/m
(%)
M80
M69M78
M95, M76
M99, M96, M93, M102, M100
M75, M90
M79, M101 M72, M81, M77
M91, M94
M97, M73M98, M74, M70
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMMEDURABILITY ASSESSMENT BY SALT
CRYSTALLIZATION DISSOLUTION ARTIFICIAL AGEING TESTS
After 30 salt cycles reduction of 50% After 60 salt cycles reduction higher on TG than NT
After 70 salt cycles reduction on R less than NT
41th
IAH
S W
OR
LD C
ON
GR
ESS
ON
HO
USI
NG
SUST
AIN
ABIL
ITYA
ND
INN
OVA
TIO
N F
OR
TH
E FU
TUR
EO
S –
Exp
erim
enta
l Res
earc
h on
Bui
ldin
g R
ehab
ilita
tion
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME
Clear increment of about 26% on TG and 10% on R treatments before salt artificial ageing tests
41th
IAH
S W
OR
LD C
ON
GR
ESS
ON
HO
USI
NG
SUST
AIN
ABIL
ITYA
ND
INN
OVA
TIO
N F
OR
TH
E FU
TUR
EO
S –
Exp
erim
enta
l Res
earc
h on
Bui
ldin
g R
ehab
ilita
tion
DURABILITY ASSESSMENT BY SALT CRYSTALLIZATION DISSOLUTION ARTIFICIAL
AGEING TESTS
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME
• NT decreased about 56% during 60 cycles • TG treated specimens have an average reduction of
circa 75% • R treated have a minor reduction of about 18% to the
initial values of non treated specimens at 70th cycle • Compressive strength data of NT specimens
extrapolated for more than 100 cycles decreased to about 30% of the initial values.
• At 115th cycle the compressive strength should be less than 30% of its value before salt ageing, being higher than its value on R treated specimens that is null.41
thIA
HS
WO
RLD
CO
NG
RES
S O
N H
OU
SIN
GSU
STAI
NAB
ILIT
YAN
D IN
NO
VATI
ON
FO
R T
HE
FUTU
RE
OS
–E
xper
imen
tal R
esea
rch
on B
uild
ing
Reh
abili
tatio
nDURABILITY ASSESSMENT BY SALT
CRYSTALLIZATION DISSOLUTION ARTIFICIAL AGEING TESTS
CONCLUSIONS
• On sandstone specimens were applied two ethylsilicates (TG and R).
• Minor harmful characteristics of the R applications on Mvariety of sandstones and a better consolidation effectof TG.
• Salt crystallization artificial ageing tests highlightedgood durability of R applications and a worst behavior ofTG treatments.
41th
IAH
S W
OR
LD C
ON
GR
ESS
ON
HO
USI
NG
SUST
AIN
ABIL
ITYA
ND
INN
OVA
TIO
N F
OR
TH
E FU
TUR
EO
S –
Exp
erim
enta
l Res
earc
h on
Bui
ldin
g R
ehab
ilita
tion
THANK YOU
41th
IAH
S W
OR
LD C
ON
GR
ESS
ON
HO
USI
NG
SUST
AIN
ABIL
ITYA
ND
INN
OVA
TIO
N F
OR
TH
E FU
TUR
EO
S –
Exp
erim
enta
l Res
earc
h on
Bui
ldin
g R
ehab
ilita
tion