EAPRIL 2011 The iPad goes to school

Post on 01-Nov-2014

642 views 0 download

Tags:

description

Slides accompanying EAPRIL 2011 paper-presentation 'The iPad goes to school: discussing success factors of tablets in education'

transcript

The iPad goes to school

Antoine van den BeemtEAPRIL 23 Nov 2011

@avdbmt

Discussing success factors of tablets in education Introduction Practice: iFontys Research: pre- and post-test results Conclusion Discussion

Introduction

Antoine van den Beemt Faculty of Education HAN UoAS

Fontys UoAS

Introduction

Joris Graaumans - Fontys UoAS Eric Slaats - Fontys UoAS

The iPad goes to school

image: Peter Steiner, The New Yorker, July 5, 1993 en.wikipedia.org

The iPad goes to school

The iPad goes to school

learningandtechnology.wikispaces.com

Discussion

“current generation of teachers will never fully understand tablet use”

Diversity

The iPad goes to school

Van den Beemt, A., Akkerman, S., & Simons, P.R.J. (2009) Jongeren en interactieve media.

The iPad goes to school

image: flyxia.com/photo/2348813/no-you-werent-downloaded-you-were-born

The iPad goes to school

Young people:– Technology minded– Not technology savvy

The iPad goes to school

Discussion

“tablets are only image building tools”

The iPad goes to school

The iPad goes to school

image: info-architecture.blogspot.com

The iPad goes to school

Research to– move beyond assumptions– decide which edu purposes can be supported

by tablets

Pop-quiz

The iPad goes to school

Prerequisites for a succesful application of tablets in education

#iFontysPilot Project

AnyplaceAnytime

AnywhereAnything

Anybody

#iFontysExperiment in Smart Mobile Learningand student learning behaviour

120 Students

11 Institutes4 Service depts

41 Employees6

Studentdevelopers1 Board of advice

runtime

5months

project

#iFontysPilot Project

•Social media, Blogging, sharing knowledge• eReaders, eContent, content-enrichment • Apps & App-development• Interactive courses & Smart mobile didactics• Cloud storage (e.g. Dropbox)

iPlanner• Course schedules on mobile devices & Outlook• iFontys iPlanner campaign & site

#iFontys subprojects

informatie

• 1.000.000+ hits• Feb-Apr 2011• 5000+ students online• 1000+ educators online

#iFontys subprojects

iPlanner by #

eContent• ePubs available.• Cooperation Cambridge Press.• Experiments with publishers.

#iFontys subprojects

Recording Box• Innovative method for lecture recordings.• Searchable (meta-tags), notes, sharing.

#iFontys subprojects

#iFontys subprojects

eContent

iPresent, weView / voteboard• Beta of 3 edu-Apps• Interactive, non lineair-presentation• Polling app, twitter, etc

#iFontys subprojects

#iFontys subprojects

App development

#iFontys subprojectsresearch!

• Think&Do-tank 126 students, 41 educators• Quantitative pre-test & post-test• Qualitative evaluation-sessions

#iFontys subprojectsresearch!

• Think&Do-tank 126 students, 41 educators• Quantitative pre-test & post-test• Qualitative evaluation-sessions

InstantAvailability

3G maaktwoon-werk-tijdbruikbaar

Not a perfectWorld (Yet)App-Production

Behoefte aan

interactie /

presentatie

toolVraag naaropen iPad tentamens

BenuttingMicro momenten

Device zetaan tot- Lezen- Plannen- Twitteren

Personal Tool

eContent!!!

meer Mobile activedocenten

Verzamelkennis enbest practices Co-Creation

enexperience

learning

Gebruik

social

media

Discussion

“tablets will never replace books”

Research

pre-test and post-test open exploration of possible iPad use

in education self-reports: pc use, ipad use in

relation to learning activities 50 respondents (84) beginning 2011

Research

General results: users moved from pc/laptop use to

iPad use for information retrieval, content creation, and studying.

more positive image of Fontys as an innovative institution.

Research

social media,

Research

email, reading edu materials, checking schedules

Research

creating content (assignments)

Research

need for digital materials attitude towards interactive media ‘playground period’ effects on learning results low increased engagement

Conclusion

learning purpose? student- and school characteristics

rather than technology diversity in skills, experiences and

preferences

Discussion

“app technology will not allow differentiation on learning

preferences”

Thank you!

antoine.vandenbeemt@han.nl@avdbmt