Economic Viability of a Varroa IPM System

Post on 10-Jan-2016

46 views 1 download

description

Economic Viability of a Varroa IPM System. Keith S. Delaplane, James D. Ellis University of Georgia www.ent.uga.edu/bees. Concluded Colonies with resistant queens and screen bottoms tend to:. Have fewer mites, especially at seasons when mite depredation is most severe, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

transcript

Economic Viability of a Varroa IPM System

Keith S. Delaplane, James D. Ellis University of Georgia

www.ent.uga.edu/bees

Concluded

Colonies with resistant queens and screen bottoms tend to:

• Have fewer mites, especially at seasons when mite depredation is most severe,

• Have delayed onset of economic threshold.

. . . and detected

Favorable compensatory interactions:

• Between resistant queens and screens,

• Between queens and screens and non-isolated apiaries.

Design

Design

• 2 years

Design

• 2 years

• 6 beekeeper collaborators

Design

• 2 years

• 6 beekeeper collaborators

• 21-30 colonies each

Design

• 2 years

• 6 beekeeper collaborators

• 21-30 colonies each

• 3 treatments within apiary

Design

• 2 years

• 6 beekeeper collaborators

• 21-30 colonies each

• 3 treatments within apiary– chemical: Feb and Aug chemical

Design

• 2 years

• 6 beekeeper collaborators

• 21-30 colonies each

• 3 treatments within apiary– chemical: Feb and Aug chemical

– IPM: bottom screen + Russian

Design

• 2 years

• 6 beekeeper collaborators

• 21-30 colonies each

• 3 treatments within apiary– chemical: Feb and Aug chemical

– IPM: bottom screen + Russian – Control: no chemical or IPM, non-selected

Design

• Monitored:– Mite fall– Onset of threshold– Honey yield– Time spent working colonies– Queen loss (replaced as found)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

month

mit

es o

n st

icky

she

et (2

4 h)

s

Control

Chemical

IPM

Varroa counts, 24-h mite drop

Excluding colonies treatment threshold

2005 2006

17 .9

1 3 .1

2 1 .3

0

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0

C o n tr o l C h e m ic a l IP M

mit

esV a rro a c o u n ts , a v e ra g e d

7469

94

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Control Chemical IPM

%

Percent colonies reaching threshold at least once in two years

60 mites / 24-hr; Delaplane and Hood 1997, 1999

33593078

3222

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Control Chemical IPM

poun

ds2005 season honey production (pounds)

2053

1104

660

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Control Chemical IPM

poun

ds2006 season honey production (pounds)

254226

262

0

25

50

75

100

125

150

175

200

225

250

275

300

Control Chemical IPM

seco

nds

Average time spent working colony (seconds)

446

534

418

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

Control Chemical IPM

visi

tsTotal number colony visits

40.4

33.530.4

0

10

20

30

40

50

Control Chemical IPM

hour

sTotal time spent working colonies (hours)

40.4

33.530.4

0

10

20

30

40

50

Control Chemical IPM

hour

sTotal time spent working colonies (hours)

screens

31.5Colony work

39

61

72

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Control Chemical IPM

%Percent of colonies dead after 2 years

46

54

48

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Control Coumaphos IPM

% o

f col

onie

sRequeening Rate, period 1% colonies requeened, Feb-Aug 2005, n=54

39

46

55

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Control Chemical IPM

% o

f col

onie

sRequeening Rate, period 2

% colonies requeened, 2005 Aug-Apr 2006, n=33-49

Conclusions

Compared to control colonies or chemical colonies, IPM colonies:

Conclusions

Compared to control colonies or chemical colonies, IPM colonies:

• Compared favorably for average mite levels,

17.9

13.1

21.3

0

10

20

30

40

Control Chemical IPM

%

Varroa counts, averaged

Conclusions

Compared to control colonies or chemical colonies, IPM colonies:

• Compared favorably for average mite levels,

• Compared favorably for onset of threshold,

17.9

13.1

21.3

0

10

20

30

40

Control Chemical IPM

%

Varroa counts, averaged

7469

94

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Control Chemical IPM

%

Percent colonies reaching threshold at least once in two years

60 mites / 24-hr; Delaplane and Hood 1997, 1999

Conclusions

Compared to control colonies or chemical colonies, IPM colonies:

• Had highest honey production,2053

1104

660

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Control Chemical IPM

poun

ds

2006 season honey production (pounds)

Conclusions

Compared to control colonies or chemical colonies, IPM colonies:

• Had highest honey production,

• Had highest total work hours,

2053

1104

660

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Control Chemical IPM

poun

ds

2006 season honey production (pounds)

40.4

33.530.4

0

10

20

30

40

50

Control Chemical IPM

hour

s

Total time spent working colonies (hours)

Conclusions

Compared to control colonies or chemical colonies, IPM colonies:

• Had highest honey production,

• Had highest total work hours,

• Fewest colony deaths, and

2053

1104

660

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Control Chemical IPM

poun

ds

2006 season honey production (pounds)

40.4

33.530.4

0

10

20

30

40

50

Control Chemical IPM

hour

s

Total time spent working colonies (hours)

39

61

72

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Control Chemical IPM

%

Percent of colonies dead after 2 years

Conclusions

Compared to control colonies or chemical colonies, IPM colonies:

• Lowest queen replacement rate.

39

46

55

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Control Chemical IPM

% o

f col

onie

s

Requeening Rate, period 2% colonies requeened, 2005 Aug-Apr 2006, n=33-49

46

54

48

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Control Coumaphos IPM

% o

f col

onie

s

Requeening Rate, period 1% colonies requeened, Feb-Aug 2005, n=54