Post on 23-Feb-2016
description
transcript
Emphasizing the Dialog atMonterey Peninsula College
• Fred Hochstaedter• Academic Senate President• SLO Coordinator• Monterey Peninsula College
What we do,What we emphasize,
And why
We hope that SLOs can provide a formal framework for faculty to converse, as professionals, about teaching, learning, pedagogy, and curricula.
Professional teachers talking to each other about teaching and student learning is a primary characteristic of a vibrant academic institution. We hope that the result of these conversations is more insightful pedagogy that improves student learning in MPC courses.
-MPC SLO Committee, 2007
Our Philosophy
What We WantedA process that is simple (Keep it Simple Sweetheart)
A process that is sustainable in a variety of budget environments A process that fit with our existing processes such as resource allocation
Led to Three Principles…
Three Principles
1.All SLOs (program, institutional, general education) must be evaluable at the course level.
More info: http://www.mpcfaculty.net/senate/FacultyHandbook/FacultyHandbookSLOs.pdf
Evaluation of student work
Grades:Information for
the Student
SLOs:Information for
the Program
Leads to…
More info: http://www.mpcfaculty.net/senate/FacultyHandbook/FacultyHandbookSLOs.pdf
Three Principles
2. Instructors regularly evaluate student learning. The result of this effort is valuable information for quality improvement for the program.
Three Principles
3. We need to give faculty members time to engage in the dialog.
More info: http://www.mpcfaculty.net/senate/FacultyHandbook/FacultyHandbookSLOs.pdf
Monterey Peninsula College Planning and Resource Allocation Process
(simplified version)1. Planning 3-year Institutional Educational Master Plan
2. Program Review 6-year Cycle Annual Report with Action Plans
3. Institutional Review Administration Faculty-led advisory groups
4. Resource Allocation Infrastructure Equipment Personnel
5. Evaluation Institutional Area
Monterey Peninsula College Planning and Resource Allocation Process
1. Planning 3-year Institutional Educational Master Plan
2. Program Review 6-year Cycle Annual Report with Action Plans
3. Institutional Review Administration Faculty-led advisory groups
4. Resource Allocation Infrastructure Equipment Personnel
5. Evaluation Institutional Area
SLOs live here
Data drivenDialog
2. Program Review 6-year Cycle Annual Report with Action Plans
Instructor Reflections on Student Learning
Program Reflections on Student Learning
These Forms/Processes are the Heart of MPC’s SLO Efforts.They are designed to prompt Dialog Collaboration Improvement Efforts Action Plan Rationale
Code word for SLO
1. Instructor Reflections on
Student Learning
2. Program Reflections on
Student Learning 3. Action Plans
Instructor Reflections …
…leads to…
Program Reflections …
…Two hours during each flex day…
…leads to…
…Annual Report / Action Plans
PRSL = SLO
2. Program Review 6-year Cycle Annual Report with Action Plans
From the Student Learning Section…
And then…
And then…
And finally…
SLOs are fully integrated into the 6-year program review guidelines
Integration of Student Learning and Program Reflections into *all* resource allocation processes.
1. Faculty Position Requests
3. Foundation Grant
Proposals
2. Classified Position Requests
Excerpts from Anthropology Program Reflections
Excerpts from Anthropology Program Reflections
Excerpts from Anthropology Program Reflections
Excerpts from Anthropology Program Reflections
Excerpts from Anthropology Program Reflections
Excerpts from Anthropology Program Reflections
Excerpts from Anthropology Program Reflections
At MPC, the Program Reflections are The heart of dialog during flex activities Cited as rational for action plans Well integrated into the Program Review Process Well integrated into all resource allocation processes Viewed as the basis for dialog Visited at least once per semester and most importantly…
At MPC, the Program Reflections are
A grass-roots, bottom-up, approach
to evaluating student learning
and using the results to inform plans to improve.
We hope that SLOs can provide a formal framework for faculty to converse, as professionals, about teaching, learning, pedagogy, and curricula.
Professional teachers talking to each other about teaching and student learning is a primary characteristic of a vibrant academic institution. We hope that the result of these conversations is more insightful pedagogy that improves student learning in MPC courses.
-MPC SLO Committee, 2007
Our Philosophy
The primary purpose of an ACCJC-accredited institution is to foster learning in its students.
An effective institution ensures that its resources and processes support student learning, continuously assesses that learning, and pursues institutional excellence and improvement.
An effective institution maintains an ongoing, self-reflective dialogue about its quality and improvement.”
-ACCJC, “Introduction to the Accreditation Standards”
From the ACCJC