Energy Based Hazard Recognition - Minnesota Safety Council · Energy – Based Hazard Recognition...

Post on 03-Jun-2020

12 views 1 download

transcript

Energy – Based Hazard

Recognition

Enbridge Project Safety Specialist

Northern Region Safety Day

John Jenkins

September 2017

Overview

2

Hazard recognition is the first step in situational awareness.

Hazard recognition

Risk perception

Risk tolerance

Behavior & Performance

Hazard Recognition

3

What proportion of hazards can workers identify?

• Heavy Equipment

• Sharp Blade

• Vehicular Traffic

• Uneven Surfaces

• Noise

• Flying Debris

• Heat

• Crush/Pinch Point

Hazard Recognition

4

Every injury is the result of the unwanted release of one or more energy sources.

Thus, every source of energy is a hazard.

5

45% Data from 4,800 worker-hours of observation (CII 2013)

Hazard Recognition

Hazard Recognition

6

Hazard Recognition

7

Sun exposure Temporary

supported

pipe

Craned load

Mechanical

pulley

Mobile

equipment

Vehicles Powerlines

Uneven work

surfaces

Unsupported

soil

Exposure to

insects and

animals

Pressure

from pipe

expansion

Hazard Recognition

8

9

Hazard Recognition – Count the Fs

10

FINISHED FILES ARE THE

RESULT OF YEARS OF SCIENTIFIC

STUDY COMBINED WITH THE

EXPERIENCE OF YEARS

Hazard Recognition – Count the Fs

11

FINISHED FILES ARE THE

RESULT OF YEARS OF SCIENTIFIC

STUDY COMBINED WITH THE

EXPERIENCE OF YEARS

Hazard Recognition – Count the Fs

12

TWO OF THE MOST POWERFUL

OF ALL HUMAN FEARS ARE THE FEAR

OF FAILURE AND THE FEAR OF

SUCCESS

Hazard Recognition – Count the Fs

13

TWO OF THE MOST POWERFUL

OF ALL HUMAN FEARS ARE THE FEAR

OF FAILURE AND THE FEAR OF

SUCCESS

Hazard Recognition: The Energy Wheel

14

Gravity

Motion

Mechanical

Electrical

Pressure Sound

Radiation

Biological

Chemical

Temperature

Hazard Recognition: Parts of the Energy Wheel

15

KG

Gravity: Force caused by the attraction of all masses to the mass of the earth

16

Hazard Recognition: Parts of the Energy Wheel

17

Motion: Change in position of objects or substances

18

Hazard Recognition: Parts of the Energy Wheel

19

Mechanical: Rotation, vibration, or motion of equipment, materials, or tools.

Hazard Recognition: Parts of the Energy Wheel

20

Electrical: The presence of an electrical charge or current.

Hazard Recognition: Parts of the Energy Wheel

21

Pressure: Liquid or gas compressed or under a vacuum

22

Hazard Recognition: Parts of the Energy Wheel

23

Chemical: Reactive elements in the environment

Hazard Recognition: Parts of the Energy Wheel

24

Biological: Living organisms that pose health risks

Hazard Recognition: Parts of the Energy Wheel

25

Radiation: Elements that emit ions or atomic particles

Hazard Recognition: Parts of the Energy Wheel

26

Sound: Audible vibrations caused from the contact of two or more objects

Hazard Recognition

27

67 62

44 40

28 24

20 19 17

2

Percent of hazards identified by type.

Do energy mnemonics CAUSE improvement?

Hazard

Recognitio

n P

erf

orm

ance

Time

Baseline

Phase

Intervention

Phase

Charleston Field testing

35%

New Orleans Field testing

20%

› Hallowell, M.R., Albert, A.*, Skaggs, M.*, and Kleiner, B. (2017). “Empirical measurement and improvement of hazard recognition skill” Safety Science, 93, 1-8.

› Hallowell, M.R. and Hansen, D.* (2016). “Measuring and improving designer hazard recognition skill: Critical competency to enable prevention through design.” Safety Science, 82, 254-263.

› Albert, A.*, Hallowell, M.R., Lingard, H., and Kleiner, B. (2015). “Multiple baseline testing: An experimental method for drawing causal inferences in construction engineering and management research.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 04015012-1 to 04015012-13.

› Albert, A.*, Hallowell, M.R., and Kleiner, B. (2014). “Experimental field testing of a real-time construction hazard identification and transmission technique.” Construction Management and Economics, Taylor and Francis, 32(10): 1000-1016.

› Tixier, A.*, Hallowell, M.R., Albert, A.*, van Boven, L., and Kleiner, B. (2014). “Psychological antecedents of risk-taking behavior in construction.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 140(11): 04014052-1 to 04014052-10.

› Albert, A.*, Hallowell, M.R., Kleiner, B., Golparvar-Fard, M., and Chen, A. (2014). “Enhancing construction hazard recognition with high fidelity augmented virtuality.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 04014024-1 to 04014024-11.

› Albert, A.*, Hallowell, M.R., and Kleiner, B. (2014). “Emerging strategies for construction safety and health hazard recognition.” Journal of Safety, Health, and Environmental Research, ASSE, 10(2): 152-161.

› Albert, A.*, Hallowell, M.R., and Kleiner, B.M. (2013). “Enhancing construction hazard recognition and communication with energy-based cognitive mnemonics and a safety meeting maturity model: A multiple baseline study.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 04013042-1 to 04013042-12.

Backed by science