Enterprise Search and Findability Survey 2013

Post on 11-Jun-2015

12,952 views 2 download

Tags:

description

Results from the Enterprise Search and Findability Survey 2013, presented at Enterprise Search Europe in London on the 15 May, 2013 and Findability Day, 30 May in Stockholm by Kristian Norling.

transcript

Enterprise Search Europe, 15 May 2013, London

Findability Day, 30 May 2013, Stockholm

RESULTS FROM THE ENTERPRISE SEARCH AND FINDABILITY SURVEY

2013

SLIDESHARE.NET/FINDWISE

GLOBAL RESULTS

SIGN-UP FOR 2014ANNUAL SURVEY

101 RESPONDENTSGLOBALLY

ONLY PRACTITIONERS

73% more than 1000 employees

56% more than 5000 employees

43% more than 10 000 employees

Demographics

This year more private than

public organisations

More BIG organisations than in 2012

60% are global

Demographics

81%ONE CORPORATE

LANGUAGE

BUTMOST ORGS HAVE INFO

IN MORE THAN 2 LANGUAGES

About half of the organisations have at least two languages supported by search.

About a quarter supports A LOT of languages.

Languages

HOW MUCH RELEVANT

UNSTRUCTURED CONTENT (ALL KINDS OF FILES, E.G. TEXT DOCUMENTS,

SPREADSHEETS, PICTURES ETC) IS SEARCHABLE IN YOUR ORGANISATION TODAY?

63% LESS THAN NEEDED

BUT

16% MORE THAN NEEDED

IN THREE YEARS TIME, THE SEARCHABLE INFORMATION IN

YOUR ORGANISATION WILL BE... ?

95%WILL INCREASE

DO YOU HAVE A SEARCH STRATEGY IN PLACE?

24% YES

38% PLANNING TO IN 2013/14

HOW CRITICAL IS FINDING THE RIGHT INFORMATION TO BUSINESS

GOALS AND SUCCESS?

78%IMPERATIVE/SIGNIFICANT

IS IT EASY TO FIND THE RIGHT INFORMATION WITHIN YOUR

ORGANISATION TODAY?

9%FAIRLY EASY

5% DECREASE FROM 2012

63%HARD/VERY HARD10% INCREASE FROM 2012

WHAT ARE THE OBSTACLES TO FINDING THE RIGHT

INFORMATION?

64% Inconsistency in how we tag content

64% Don’t know where to look

55% Lack of adequate tags

53% Poor search functionality

39% Don't know what to look for

Obstacles

“some critical data isn't indexed.”

“poor dataquality”

“silos”

“Most of our content is inconsistent, unreliable, duplicated in multiple places, or worse. Stakeholders have incentive to complain about search but not to improve their own content that feeds into search.”

Other

WHAT IS YOUR LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE

EXISTING SEARCH APPLICATIONS WITHIN YOUR

ORGANISATION?

19%VERY OR MOSTLY SATISFIED

40%VERY OR MOSTLY

DISSATISFIED

WHAT IS YOUR LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE

FOLLOWING FEATURES OF SEARCH IN YOUR ORGANISATION?

WHAT IS YOUR PRIMARY BUSINESS CASE FOR

INVESTING IN SEARCH?

“increase efficency by redusing time spent searching for information”

“Increase reusability”

“Make information Acc3 accountable accesible accurate”

“Improved quality in business decisions, saving time, harmonizing our offering globaly”

“To find information, make information accessible, avoid duplicates and make the everyday life for our users easier.”

““knowledge is a strong company asset - so we need to be able to leverage, share and apply the knowledge better.”

IMPORTANCE OF BEING ABLE TO SEARCH THE SOURCES AND

SYSTEMS

HOW MANY EMPLOYEES ARE WORKING ON ADMINISTERING/DEVELOPING/IMPLEMENTING

SEARCH WITHIN YOUR ORGANISATION?

47% LESS THAN ONE

21% 1-2 PERSONS

17% 3-5 PERSONS

HOW MANY EMPLOYEES (FTES) WILL BE WORKING ON SEARCH

IN 2016?

17% LESS THAN ONE

31% 1-2 PERSONS

28% DON’T KNOW

BUDGET

56% HAVE NO BUDGETOR DON’T KNOW

35% LESS THAN 50 000 EURO

41% DON’T KNOW...

43%

2016SLIGHT OR SIGNIFICANT

BUDGET INCREASE

INFORMATION

59% of organisations have or plan to

implement a metadata standard. 

42% have taxonomies in place. 

47% have or plan for a content/information

lifecycle management process in 2013/14.

Information

SEARCH APPLICATIONS/TECH

FEEDBACK FROM USERS IS IMPORTANT, SO HOW

MANY ENABLE IT?

MOST ORGANISATIONS HAVE MULTIPLE SEARCH

APPLICATIONS

SAME SEARCH APPLICATION USED ON BOTH INTRANET

AND PUBLIC WEBSITE?

IMPORTANT FEATURES IN SEARCH APPLICATIONS

ALMOST DONE...

Budget and resources...

Strategy is on the agenda!

78% consider Enterprise Search to be a critical success factor.

Summary