Post on 04-Jun-2018
transcript
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
1/26
149
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND RENOVATION OF PORTS AND
HARBOURS IN BULGARIA
EMMANUEL BOON
Department of Human Ecology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103
B-1090 Brussels, BELGIUM
E-mail: eboon@vub.ac.be
ABSTRACT
Over the past few decades, the inextricable link between planning for socio-economic development
and environmental health has become more obvious. Previously, the main policy objective of socio-
economic development in all countries of the world is improving the quality of life of the
population. Most countries attempted to achieve this by formulating and implementing development
plans without any serious effort to integrate environmental considerations into the process.
However, in order to ensure that human activities interfere minamally with the functioning of the
life support systems or natural ecological processes, environmental planning is becoming an
increasingly important imperative in the rapidly globalised world economy. This paper provides an
overview on the concept of planning, environment, and the importance of and approaches to
environmental planning. The application of planning to port environments in Bulgaria certainly
involves strategic management implications. The paper discusses a number of useful strategic
management elements to guide an effective integration of environmental planning in the
management of ports and harbours in Bulgaria. These key strategic considerations includeenvironmental education and training; institutional and human capacity building; increasing and
broadening participation; co-operation, networking and partnerships; and the evaluation and
monitoring of port operations for the detection and mitigation of negative impacts. The discussion
of the chapter is supported by a case study on the ports and harbours in Ghana .
Keywords: Environmental education, Environmental planning, Institutional capacity building,
Monitoring, Planning process, Strategic management, Sustainable development.
1. INTRODUCTION
Although the extractors of the various natural resources hold different views on the justification oftheir activities, the continuing depletion of the earths resources at an increasing rate remains a
fundamental and an increasingly serious problem. As Agenda 21 [UN, 1992] points out, the
prevailing systems for decision-making in many countries tend to separate economic, social and
environmental factors at the policy, planning and management levels. The various actors who
exploit and use natural resources often look myopically at the environmental system and see only
those parts which are within their own sphere of activity and/or interest. Indeed, it is because of this
myopic viewpoint that various human interventions in the environment often tend to work against
each other. Clearly, given the fact that environmental issues are complex, plagued with uncertainty
and highly political in nature [Bardwell, 1991], more attention than hitherto is needed in planning
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
2/26
150
and implementing human activities in order to ensure a move towards sustainable development.
The introduction of environmental management systems at the national level in many countries, and
the requirement that such systems should go beyond merely restoring environmental damage to
actually reducing or eliminating pollution, clearly show the importance of environmental planning
in forestalling further damage to the natural environment and society. Not surprisingly, economic
policies that are not integrated with environmental planning, or do not address environmental
protection issues adequately, tend to exacerbate environmental pollution. The extensive damage thathas been caused in many countries through the exploitation of resources such as forest products,
minerals, agricultural lands and water bodies is symptomatic of the lack of proper environmental
planning. Furthermore, planning for socio-economic development and the health of the environment
are inextricably linked. For example, if the landscape loses its productivity, standards of living are
bound to decline; and, when it loses its aesthetic appeal, property prices may fall. Clearly therefore,
environmental planning needs to be done and implemented in an integrated manner at the level of
the local community, as well as at regional, national and international levels. Rosenbaum
[Rosenbaum, 1974] has identified a number of obstacles, which hinder effective environmental
planning:
'...in the past, national governments have been potent environmental degraders because their
planners usually treated the environmental consequences of policy as a secondary effect -unnoticed, unplanned, and seldom emphasised....Whether through indifference, ignorance, or
political expediency, public officials, by disregarding ecological values, established a highly
stable formal and informal policy process that circumvented the environmental problems they
were generating.'
Another increasingly serious problem facing the world today arises from the fact that environmental
pollution does not respect national boundaries. Increasingly each nation is both creator and victim
of pollution created by others and, consequently, it is becoming impossible for nations to protect
their own environment without regional or international co-operation.
Many Central and Eastern European countries and the South are seriously disadvantaged by their
limited planning and administrative structures. Often their ability to plan effectively is also thwarted
by poverty (sometimes extreme poverty), low level of public awareness, little or no public
participation, and civil unrest. [OECD, 1995a] The absence of effective legislative and
administrative procedures for incorporating ecological data into the decision-making process
constitutes another major hindrance to effective environmental planning and management.
The approach to development planning in most of these countries has been 'top down'; and this led
to excessive centralisation of the planning machinery; concentration of development efforts on
selected sectors of the economy without any appropriate linkages among the sectors or with the rest
of the economy; and concentration of socio-economic activity in a few of the urban centres.
Slocombe [Slocombe, 1993] adds that while the negative environmental and social impacts of
mega-projects and suburb and urban growth have long been known, only recently haveenvironmental problems been framed in planning terms. Devuyst [Devuyst, 1993] emphasises that
'environmental concerns in developing countries should be marked by a determination to achieve
sustainable development in an environmentally sound manner'.
Political and organisational obstacles constrain the ability of governments in developing countries
to formulate more credible environmental management systems [Carley and Christie, 1992]. Also,
the prevailing acute shortage of indigenous management skills at nearly all levels constitutes a
major, if not the major, constraint to the achievement of socio-economic development. The inability
of current managerial and planning systems to cope either with the dynamics of rapid change, or
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
3/26
151
with the interaction between numerous organisations, entrepreneurs and the environment, is referred
to as limits to governance. These interactions among the various actors produce enormous
turbulence in the environment, which further erodes the ability of governments and non-state actors
to achieve sustainable development.
Two other critical problems, which hinder effective sustainable environmental planning in bothdeveloped and developing countries, are fragmentation of policy and institution and tensions which
can occur between central, regional and local governments. Governments often pursuecontradictory policies. But both politicians and the public appear to be impotent and lack thenecessary will or motivation to force those in power to undertake the difficult task of mediating
between conflicting social, economic and environmental goals for protecting the environment.
A further difficulty in environmental planning is caused by international rivalry. It creates tensions
in international relations and makes collaboration between and among nations difficult to achieve.A typical example of this is the wide and growing socio-economic disparity between the rich and
poor nations, which is often a critical issue in all discussions on environmental planning andmanagement at the international level. Similar problems of both developmental planning andenvironmental planning also occur at the organisational level, as they do at national andinternational levels. G. Daneke [Daneke, 1982] illustrates the situation thus:
'The incentives for corporate planners to interact with social and environmental policy analystsare certainly present in terms of reducing investment uncertainties, but an atmosphere of mutualco-operation to achieve viable trade-offs between economic and environmental concerns may bedifficult to achieve.'
2. UNDERSTANDING THE ENVIRONMENT
Clearly, ensuring a good environment, and moving towards sustainable development, require acomplete understanding of the total environmental system as well as of the political, organisationaland managerial functions of modern society. In other words, learning to understand the interactions
between the environment and society is an important pre-requisite of effective environmental
planning and management.
The environment comprises many subsystems, actors and processes. The main environmentalsubsystems are physical, biotic, ecological, social, political, economic, and technological. Thesesubsystems include all subsurface elements, all man-made and natural surface elements, as well asthose of the atmosphere. The local community, public agencies, professional associations, propertydevelopers, property owners and the general public are the key actors in the environmentaldecision-making process
Often, environmental decision-making is significantly influenced by both behavioural and cultural
dimensions. Environmental decision-making can be nation-specific or region-specific. There are, on
the other hand, increasingly serious global environmental problems that can only be addressed
through international co-operation, collaboration and partnership. The stratospheric ozonedepletion, the greenhouse effect and diminishing biological diversity are today the main global
environmental problems [Field, 1994]. A number of serious human health and agricultural crop
damage are attributed to ozone depletion and the earths rich bio-diversity. This is putting at risk the
proper functioning of global ecosystems that are so vital to both a healthy environment and human
well-being.
Given the complexity of the environment and the increasing environmental problems being created
by various types of human activities, it is clear that a holistic approach to studying environmental
problems is more effective. It is therefore important that the environmental subsystems and their
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
4/26
152
respective elements are analysed and documented in a way that facilitates easy communication and
understanding by all the relevant actors and stakeholders. This means that formats, which permit
intelligent debate and decision-making and minimise confusion and conflict between and among the
actors, must be adopted. Understanding the environment as a system and the interactions amongst
its subsystems should be based on an analysis of the cause and effect relationships between and
amongst the various constituent parts and the stakeholders. In addition, a planning and management
system that permits simplification and eliminates duplication or overlap within the existing system
is needed. It should however be recognised that the final outcome of the environmental decision-making process of ports and harbours of Bulgaria depends on the values they the ports attached to
the environment. It should also be noted that each port and harbour is unique, with its unique set of
values which have evolved over time. The uniqueness of a given port should therefore be the
principal determinant of its environmental planning and management system.
3. TRENDS IN PLANNING
3.1. Definition and importance of planning
Planning takes place in different environments, in a village, town, country, region or in
organisations such as ports and harbours. However, the elusive nature of planning is acknowledged
in the literature [Smith, 1993; Wildavsky, 1973]. It is argued that planning can be all things to allpeople the ability to control the future by current acts, the application of causal knowledge, a
form of political power, and an act of faith. Benveniste [Benveniste, 1989] sees planning as the
elaboration of a set of related programmes designed to achieve certain goals ... [and the] ... planning
process is the set of interventions and other actions undertaken during the elaboration of a plan.
Planning may be said to be a rational methodology for approaching the future. It involves the
definition of the problem to be addressed, establishment of planning objectives, identification of the
assumptions on which planning is to be based, search for and evaluation of alternative courses of
action, and the selection of a particular action to be followed [Compton, 1993].
What is probably more important is the fact that development, or human well-being, is a primary
concern of planning. Development itself is increasingly defined in social and environmental terms.
It is seen as enlarging the range of peoples choices, including access to income and employment
opportunities, education, health and a clean and safe physical environment. Carley and Christie
[Carley and Christie, 1992] recognise the prevalence and importance of developmental planning
thus:
'Most...countries have...economic plans, forest plans, plans for tourism, industry, services,
ranching etc. not to mention plans for rural agricultural development. All these plans and
development efforts impact on one another; and can conflict with one another...in an attempt to
harmonise economic development with sectoral objectives, a land use planning overview is
essential ... a planning framework within which public bodies, the private sector and individuals
can all operate.'
Baldwin [Baldwin,1985] prefers to consider planning within a wider context of resource
management as the initiation, transformation, distribution and disposal of resources in a manner
capable of sustaining human activities, with a minimum disruption of physical, ecological, and
social processes. For Slocombe [Slocombe, 1993], planning is the collection and analysis of
information to serve the public interest by performing a wide range of human, economic and other
developmental activities.
Another significant trend in planning is the need to maintain cultural diversity, while at the same
time aiming to provide people with an environment that supports their way of life. People from
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
5/26
153
different cultural backgrounds have different ideas about what constitutes a satisfactory
environment. Planners should therefore have a proper understanding of how people react to their
environment; otherwise unnecessary social costs may be incurred through the unintentional creation
of environments that alienate people.
3.2. Approaches to planning
There are many approaches to planning, including substantive planning and procedural planning.Substantive planning is concerned with the subject matter of planning, or the object of planning.
Procedural planning, also called the classical model of the planning process is a means for
promoting economic growth through the application of rational procedures of thought and action.
[Faludi, 1973; Cayer and Weschler, 1988] The planning process should be separated from the
substantive content of the plan itself. Procedural planning consists of the following inter-related
steps [Cayer and Weschler, 1988]:
identification of needs, specification of goals and objectives, development of alternative means to attain each goal, estimation of the costs of each alternative, selection of the most promising alternative(s).
Darke [Darke, 1983] advocates the integration of substantive planning with procedural planning. Heargues that procedural planning theory is only a partial approach to the explanation of planning,
because it is inherently confined to a conservative political philosophy that views social action froma strictly functional perspective. Moreover, the role of the state as an agent of change is not takeninto account in procedural planning, neither is an analysis based on class, gender or politicalideology. Procedural planning theories are also said to have limited methodological basis andconstrained by their adherence to the notion of rationality. These weaknesses of the approach
prevent it from addressing adequately the larger social milieu of a planning endeavour. It is argued,therefore, that the substance of planning should not be separated from the planning process. Hudson[Hudson, 1979] suggested five types of planning, which include synoptic planning, incrementalmodel of planning, trans-active approach to planning, advocacy planning, and radical planning.
Other approaches to planning include the top-down approach, the bottom-up approach, a mixture ofthe top-down and bottom-up approaches, and the team approach.
At the micro level planning generally entails the setting of the enterprise objectives and establishingthe policies, procedures, and programmes for their realisation. It involves determining what needs to
be done, by whom, and by when, in order to discharge ones assigned responsibilities. In otherwords, the exercise is to establish a predetermined course of action within an agreed policyframework. Customarily defined as strategic, tactical, or operational, it can be at the individuallevel, at the level of a working group, or at the functional level of an organisation. At the individuallevel, planning is required to deliver assigned tasks while at the working group or the functionallevel it must include agreement on purpose, assignment and acceptance of individualresponsibilities, co-ordination of activities, increased commitment to group goals, and lateral
communication.
Mintzberg [Mintzberg, 1994] gives an excellent review of the various definitions of planning andtheir interpretation. For some, it is thinking about the future, or simply taking the future intoaccount. To others, planning is about controlling the future not just thinking about it but actingon it or enacting it. More comprehensively, planning is decision-making the consciousdetermination of courses of action designed to accomplish purposes a formalised procedure fordelivering an articulated result in the form of an integrated system of decisions.
There are many reasons why organisations need to plan. One is to ensure the co-ordination of their
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
6/26
154
activities, taking the future into account by preparing for the inevitable, pre-empting theundesirable, and controlling the controllable. Organisations must plan to be rational. The planning
process also determines the position of the planner and indicates how, and to what extent, thegeneral public should be involved [Slocombe, 1993].
4. CONCEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
It is unfortunate that while developmental planning is largely the work of economists andmainstream urban and regional planners, environmental planning remains the exclusive and
separate realm of environmentalists, ecologists, and resource managers of various kinds. Beer
[Beer, 1990] sees the role of the planner as thinking more widely about how environments can be
maintained or created to ensure human well-being within the socio-economic constraints and
conditions of the community in question and its perception of the environment. In other words,
planners do need to translate the concerns of the community for their immediate habitat into
strategies and policies in order to guide the planning process. Growing concern for the quality of the
environment, and for the preservation and conservation of nature, is thus a fundamental objective ofenvironmental planning. It underlines the need for integrating both environmental and health
aspects into the decision-making process of national planning. W. Rosenbaum [1974] argues thecentral role of environmental planning thus:
Faludi [Faludi, 1987] sees environmental planning as the sum total of all public environmental
measures which an environmental authority can take. According to him, an environmental plan which is a document (or documents) used in guiding operational decision-making on public
environmental measures therefore stands for the outcome of deliberations in environmentalplanning. Westman [Westman, 1978] views environmental planning in terms of measuring the
value of the earths resources and predicting changes caused by disturbances. It is concerned with
the analysis of social, economic and environmental relationships resulting from human activities,
and with the design of programmes and action plans for improving both social well-being and
environmental health. He stresses the importance of environmental planning in these words:
'It seems clear that if we are to preserve for future generations some semblance of the biological
order of the world of the past and hope to improve on the deteriorating standards of urbanpublic health, environmental science and technology must quickly come to play a dominant rolein designing our social and industrial structure for tomorrow ... The prediction of impacts may
form part of tasks in environmental planning and design, resource management, and appliedecology.'
The objectives of environmental planning thus include measures to be taken under a variety ofcircumstances, some of which cannot be known in advance. The environmental planning processalso forces public officials to aggressively assert governmental power in vast areas of the economythat have been left largely to private interests. National governments need to establish priorities forenvironmental protection, calculate and create the trade-offs to be made between environmental
protection and other national goals, and plan resource use and protection over several generations.In addition, the planning process should give equal emphasis to both national socio-economicdevelopment and environmental quality.
It is very important for national governments to be more sensitive to the environmental impacts oftheir own policies, and more willing to sacrifice other objectives to environmental protection whengood ecology so dictates. Nations will bear not only severe environmental costs for delaying such
planning, but will also incur high political and economic costs. Delaying environmental planningmay lead to severe environmental costs; it may also lead to near-crisis situations whosemanagement would entail high or very high social costs.
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
7/26
155
The design and implementation of appropriate and effective environmental plans depend on theability to prepare accurate Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs).
The purpose of EIA is two-fold: first, it attempts to identify what functions of the affected resourceswould be modified by each alternative proposal; and secondly it attempts to predict reliably thedirection and magnitude of any modification likely to result from each alternative decision or actionas compared to when that action is not taken. Evaluation, on the other hand, is the subsequent
examination of both the patterns of modifications caused by the action(s) taken and theconsequences thereof. The approach to environmental planning should be broad, based on bothmonetary and non-monetary considerations. Good inter-disciplinary skills are needed in anintegrated planning approach. From the very outset, the environmental planner needs to understandthe distinction between environmental assessment and evaluation. Faludi [Faludi, 1987]suggests that planning should depend on the context in which it takes place the planningenvironment Ryding [Ryding, 1994] proposes two different but closely related environmental
planning and decision-making approaches which are very relevant to ports and harbours:
the institutional approach, used in the social planning process (including agricultural, forestry,municipal and transportation sectors), in which remedial measures are often in the form oflegislation, regulations, taxes and charges; and
the commercial approach, used for planning in the business sector (including energy production,and industrial, trade and retail sectors), in which remedial measures can be in the form of non-regulatory initiatives for improving existing treatment processes, developing newenvironmentally-friendly processes and products, reducing waste through waste minimisation
programmes, and/or for improving the logistics of transportation, storage and sale of products.
A generalised planning and decision-making model for all aspects of environmental protection isshown in Figure 1.
Three pertinent features of environmental planning can be deduced from this figure. The first is themulti-disciplinary nature of planning which, for example, involves economic, social, ecological,land-use and technical considerations. The second and third features refer to public involvement inthe planning process, and to the systematic approach of the process starting from the setting ofobjectives through to the implementation of remedial programmes, assessment of results and a
permanent feedback mechanism.
Input to the general planning and decision-making model derives from the separate priorities set in
the institutional and commercial approaches and from the outcome of analyses of potential
consequences based on user and cost/benefit elements. The following must be considered during the
environmental planning process of ports and harbours in Bulgaria:
environmental effect-oriented issues should focus on the minimisation of ecological threatsvis--visthe input of the mixture of pollutants released;
technologically-oriented issues should focus on access of all countries to best availabletechnologies;
economically-oriented issues should focus on potential financial consequences beforedecisions are made; also, both financial aid programmes and modalities for transferringnecessary technology should be decided upon.
The planning and decision-making approach of ports and harbours in Bulgaria may be based on the
following:
initial evaluation of the environmental areas under threat; priority list of actions; plan of action; procedure for remedial actions; and regular auditing.
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
8/26
156
In order to ensure that all the various issues are properly addressed and that nothing important is
forgotten or omitted, each step in developing a common strategy needs to be comprehensively
assessed and checked with the help of rules-of-the-thumb. The acronym ACTION, explained below,
provides a suitable set of such rules:
Figure 1. General sequence of planning and decision-making aspectsin im lementin remedial ro rammes. S. R din . 681 1994 .
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
9/26
157
A: Anticipate the participation/involvement of all the stakeholders and the general public in the
environmental planning and decision-making process as well as in the different environmental,
technical and economic consequences;
C: Conclude the most plausible economic and environmental development;
T: Tabulate the possible advantages and disadvantages of all potential decisions;
I: Initiate a thorough evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of alternative decisions;
O: Omit all less useful alternatives and highlight the preferred ones; and
N: Negotiate with all relevant parties for the acceptance of the preferred action.
In general, the following characterise an environmental plan:
all stakeholders and the general public should be involved in setting and discussingenvironmental priorities;
the plan should be relevant and capable of meeting the stated environmental objectives; the plan should be operational and cost-effective at both regional and global scales (this
implies the allocation of environmental investments beyond national and regionalboundaries); and
the plan should be realistic and feasible.4.1. Strategic environmental planning and management
Effective environmental planning and renovation of ports and harbours in Bulgaria require a sound
application of the concept of strategic planning and management. The relevant elements of strategic
planning and management for ports and harbours include the following: the setting of clear
environmental objectives and the definition appropriate policies and programmes for their
achievement; effective environmental education and training; institutional and human capacity
building; participation; co-operation; networking; partnerships; and harmonisation of policies; andfinally, evaluation, monitoring and control.
4.1.1. Strategic environmental planning
Environmental management is about the achievement of particular environmental goals and
objectives which may be broadly defined in terms of the protection and/or improvement of
environmental quality [Compton, 1993]. The setting of clear environmental objectives for ports and
harbours in Bulgaria is important in the planning process; the objectives help to determine how
specific policies and actions should be developed for their achievement. It is important that
environmental planning and management of ports and harbours in Bulgaria are guided by long-term
strategic considerations and the need for renovation. Environmental objectives may be set as precise
quantitative targets, or expressed as broad aspirations.
Strategic planning is an effective tool which nation states and organisations can use to estimate thedegree of risk of port policies and actions in Bulgaria, This will help to facilitate the realisation oftheir environmental goals and objectives. However, the top management of port organisations musthave a sound conceptual understanding of long-term planning if it is to apply this tool effectively.Daneke [Daneke, 1982] sees strategic planning as a process for distilling social goals and
objectives, and design of alternative scenarios or road maps that become the basis for meaningfulcollective choice. According to Steiner and Miner [Steiner and Miner, 1977] the essential featuresof strategic planning are:
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
10/26
158
it deals with the future impact of current decisions and actions; it examines the cause-and-effect relationships of an actual or intended decision or action
over time;
it examines the alternative courses of action that could be taken in the future, and, whenchoices are made, how they should form the basis of current decisions;
it considers future opportunities and threats together with other relevant data, therebycreating a management regime to improve current decisions for exploiting future
opportunities and for avoiding future threats; it is a process which begins with the setting of objectives and the definition of strategies and
policies to achieve those objectives; detailed plans should be developed to make sure thatappropriate strategies are implemented to achieve the stated objectives;
it is a continuing process of deciding in advance what is to be done, when it is to be done,how, and who is going to do it;
it is a philosophy, an attitude and a way of life. It is an understanding that planning requiresdedicated action based on the contemplation of the future; a determination to plan constantly
and systematically as an integral part of management; and
it may be defined as a structure of plans a structure which integrates strategic plans withshort-term operational plans.
In the absence of comprehensive strategic environmental planning and management, most countriesand organisations, especially the developing and Central and Eastern European countries, will face
mounting social costs in the long-term. Studies made by the UNDP [UNDP, 1995] on theexperience of a number of developing countries in formulating and implementing their national
conservation strategies, national environmental action plans and national Agenda-21 reveal the
following weaknesses:
the strategy was not a priority, either at the government level or at the local level; the process was externally-driven, without domestic resources and without prioritisation; emphasis was on the product (ie. strategy or action plan as a document) rather than on the
process;
there was lack of stakeholder involvement, and no ownership or implementation;each report or strategy was treated in isolation; no coherence, no information gathering and
no historical antecedent which could facilitate subsequent work; locally available management skills were insufficient, sometimes grossly so.
As Box 1 shows, port management in Bulgaria must acquire a number of critical skills if they are to
succeed in developing workable environmental plans.
Box 1: Skills needed in drawing up an environmental plan
Preparation of the plan:Preparing a plan can be a long, complicated and expensive process,
for the ports, harbours and the stakeholders. Handling the sometimes thousands of submissions
and the consequential hearing and decisions can be a highly complex process, with many
stakeholders and consultants involved. Good project management techniques are essential to
maximise efficiency, reduce delays and co-ordinate resources and inputs.
Plan Structure:The structure of an environmental plan is a fundamental matter to resolve at the
beginning of the plan preparation process. Complex structures may seem better in theory, but
can be difficult to use and more expensive to change.
Plan Contents:A plan typically contains a range of supporting technical information such as
appendices, diagrams, tables, and maps. There are a variety of techniques that can be used
some more effective than others.
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
11/26
159
Engaging Decision-makers:Active engagement of the decision-makers (EPA, local authorities,
etc.) in the process is an important aspect of plan preparation. This can be difficult given the
complexity of the issues and the length of the process (often over many years and election
cycles). Decision-makers must also have a full understanding of the issues and the statutory and
legal requirements. They should be fully informed and involved in the process, and appropriate
means should be taken to facilitate the hearing and decision-making process.
Writing Rules: Writing rules, which have the effect of regulation, is a critical skill to planpreparation. It requires a good understanding of legal principles, as well as a clear focus on the
purpose of each rule.
Alternative Methods:In order to produce a good environmental plan, the ports must assess the
full range of possible ways of achieving good environmental outcomes, and must produce a
written record of this assessment process.
Plan Integration: Integrating a plan with the policies of other plans can present some
challenges. A plan might need integrating with the plans of other local authorities (district-
regional integration, or the plans of adjoining local authorities) and with the ports own internal
plans and policies, such as strategic plans, codes of practice, and safety and security plans
Making Plans User-friendly: Plans can be large and intimidating documents, and often
difficult to use, especially for the lay person. It is therefore important to use appropriate
techniques to improve their legibility and ease of understanding and use.
Dispute Resolution: Dispute resolution is an essential skill for policy-makers, and is needed
throughout the plan preparation process. In resolving disputes it is important that the views of
different parties are given credence, while ensuring that plan provisions remain cohesive and
effective policy instruments.
4.1.2. Strategic environmental managementStrategic management is a process by which organisations determine their purpose, objectives and
desired levels of attainment; decide on actions for achieving these objectives in an appropriate
timescale, and frequently in a changing environment; implement the actions; and assess progress
and results. Whenever and wherever necessary, the actions may be changed or modified. The
magnitude of these changes can be dramatic and revolutionary, or more gradual and evolutionary
[Thompson, 1997]. As is illustrated in Figure 2, an effective strategic environmental management
system for the ports and harbours of Bulgaria can serve as a basis for overcoming the above
deficiencies. It is essential that port management should ensure a creative and error-correcting
system that gives the ports their purpose and cohesion, and assures a satisfactory return on
investment. Strategy refers to a well co-ordinated set of action programmes aimed at securing a
long-term sustainable advantage whiles strategic management is the systematic identification of,and response to, opportunities and threats, both of which can and do originate from a firms
domestic and/or international market. Strategic management is a continuous iterative process
founded on the reality of good management practice. It focuses on the present strategy of the
organisation, supported by the resources and strengths generated in the past. It also focuses on the
design and implementation of a strategy that will carry it successfully into the future [Stahl and
Grigsby, 1992]. The analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, referred to as
SWOT analysis, usually covers both the internal and external environments of the organisation.
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
12/26
160
Figure 2: The Strategic Management Model. Source: Wheelen, T. and Huger, J. (1995)
Wheelen and Hunger [Wheelen and Hunger, 1995] have proposed a strategic management model,shown in Figure 2, which separates the various activities that must be linked together in making
strategic decisions for an organisation. As can be seen from this figure, strategic management
involves the formulation, implementation, evaluation and control of strategic plans of the
organisation in question. Strategic management is also concerned with how an organisation goes
about translating its policies, missions, objectives and goals into results. This, however, can only be
done if the organisation carries out a proper assessment of its internal and external environments.
4.1.3. Environmental education and training
Probably the most demanding task in environmental planning and management of ports and
harbours in Bulgaria is that of educating and providing its employees with training and skills for
predicting the likely outcome of human activities on society and the environment itself needs to beintegrated into environmental education (EE) programmes. Indeed, enhanced public awareness of
environmental issues and problems is a critical and over-riding concern in successful environmental
planning and management [Buckley, 1991]:
In the longer term this may be done through the normal school education system. Unless publicenvironmental awareness is improved in the short-term, however, long-term improvements willbe too late. More effective means to communicate the importance of environmental concerns tothose in business, government and the general electorate are urgently needed.'
Clearly, therefore, any effort to develop an innovative and productive environmental planning
system is unlikely to succeed unless public officials, charged with a nations environmental
management, cultivated an ecological conscience themselves Environmental education and training
are most appropriate for equipping such officials and other environmental stakeholders with
essential skills in environmental planning and management. In particular, environmental education
would help port administrations and stakeholders to acquire essential skills for understanding and
using basic analytical techniques and tools such as Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), Social
Impact Assessment (SIA) and Economic Impact Assessment (EcIA) [Clark, 1989; Jain and
Hutchings, 1978; Welford and Gouldson, 1993].
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
13/26
161
Apart from helping to redress the lack of skills referred to above, environmental education and
training will also equip environmental scientists, especially in the developing countries, with
expertise in the appropriate and integrating styles of environmental management, as well as in
institutional and organisational development. However, the approach must be multi-dimensional, as
shown in Figure 3. Single issues must be analysed in their wider environmental context. And this
would require the acquisition of wider and deeper knowledge of the environment which should be
documented and disseminated in a simple but effective manner to all the social sectors concerned.
Dissemination of information would facilitate both the setting of environmental priorities and
international co-operation in environmental planning and management.
4.1.4. Increasing participation
For Stohr and Taylor [Stohr and Taylor, 1981] the most appropriate approach to environmental
planning is planning from below; that is, planning for the people and with the people. As Carley
and I. Christie [Carley and Christie, 1992] point out, environmental issues must be fully integrated
into socio-economic planning and involve public participation at all levels individual,
community and global. Faludi [Faludi, 1987] also refers to planning as teamwork in which
discussions should not be limited to the chief planners and politicians, but should involve all
sections of the community. He sees participation as a means of furthering criticism, thereby
expanding the range of options considered. Ryding [Ryding, 1994] also suggests that, at the
individual level, people should assist in environmental protection work through participation in
environmental organisations. At the community level, environmental considerations should be
integrated into all sectors of society, while the responsibility for safeguarding the environment at
the global level should be shared by all countries, both rich and poor. Planning without participation
is ineffective, undemocratic, paternalistic, and doomed to failure. Effective participation will
Figure 3. Multidimensional Approach to Planning.
R din 1994
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
14/26
162
however depend on the scope and goals of the strategy and the likely participants as well as on the
political and social circumstances [OECD, 2002].
4.1.5. Co-operation and partnerships
Chechile and Carlisle [Chechile and Carlisle, 1991] cite a number of new environmental challenges
which compel the various stakeholders in the environment to change their attitudes to
environmental issues. These challenges include the high degree of uncertainty attached to the long-term; complex inter-relationships of numerous variables and time constraints; shrinking distances;
widening scope; and cultural diversity. The complexity of these challenges implies that
environmental policies, plans and programmes of individual countries and organisations need to be
effectively co-ordinated and harmonised. Principle 27 of Agenda 21 of the United Nations
Conference on Sustainable Development [1992] held in Rio de Janeiro emphasized the need for
cooperation and partnerships by the world community to ensure the attainment of sustainable
development. Also, the United Nations World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) held
in Johannesburg in 2002 [United Nations, 2002] recommended the establishment of partnerships
amongst sustainable development stakeholders to facilitate the implementation of the Plan of
Implementation (PoI).
The OECD [OECD, 1995b] recognises that environmental planning needs to be effectively co-
ordinated at the international level, because planning requirements are proliferating and becoming
increasingly more complex. Also, given that environmental plans are made at the local, regional,
national and international levels, and that the planning process often involves several agencies, it is
clear that co-operation between and among the different agencies is paramount. To this end Morell
[Morell, 1995] suggests that the planning process must have two characteristic features: first, a
mechanism for wide dissemination of decisions and information; and, secondly, established
structures enabling cross-functional activity. Effective modalities of communication are critical to
both and should be developed to ensure wide access to relevant information. For example, video
and tele-conferencing facilities can help to reduce the cost of interaction and, at the same time,
increase the frequency of communication among the experts. Also, partnerships and networks
should be developed to facilitate both understanding and consensus-building among people with
diverse expertise, outlook and cultural background.
Both governments and environmental stakeholders often play an important role in ensuring that
environmental policies, programmes and actions are co-ordinated and harmonised. A successful
implementation of environmental plans requires co-ordination at all levels. In the case of
developing countries, a high level of co-operation between aid donors and the recipient countries is
needed to make sure that all these actors understand each other and that they do not work against
each other [OECD, 1995c]. National governments must be at the centre of co-ordination at the
following levels:
between sectoral ministries and their related organisations; between local, regional and national authorities; between various external actors such as UN agencies, bilateral donors, and international
organisations.
Some current attempts to improve co-ordination include the following:
better information networks; sensitivity to national characteristics (culture, tradition, etc); multi-layer co-ordination; institution-building and tools; co-ordination at the sectoral level as a practical starting point;
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
15/26
163
providing incentives for co-ordination at the individual career level; training experts in multi-sectoral planning and implementation; indicators of sustainability; agreed indicators to measure changes in both natural and social
environments to determine whether sustainability of activities is being achieved.
4.1.6. Human and institutional capacity building
Human and institutional capacity building, also referred to as institutional and organisationaldevelopment in literature, is critical for effective environmental planning. Institutional development
addresses legal and organisational constraints and limitations in human resources, while legal
institutions underlie the fabric of development and environmental control [Carley and Christie,
1992]. For example, property systems and land use planning controls are very important factors in
the development and conservation initiatives in ports; yet, very often programmes are initiated
without an analysis of these fundamental systems. Legal systems include the necessary laws,
regulations and environmental standards, and the government framework to implement them. The
legal system also embodies formal arrangements for centralisation or decentralisation of planning
and implementation, as well as the institutional arrangements of government.
In some countries environmental plans are made by a number of agencies. Such multi-planning
agencies are clusters of related planning organisations which permit a wider input of specialisation
as well as co-ordination of tasks [Faludi, 1987]. The aim of inter-organisational development should
be to forge new, formal and informal linkages among agencies of the government, and beyond
government to business and the voluntary and community sectors.
There is now an urgent need in most of the developing countries for institutional capacity building
for sustainable development. For this, it is suggested that a critical element in strengthening
institutional and legislative structures is the selection of environmental policy instruments [Buckley,
1991]. There are three main types of instruments for putting environmental policies into effect,
namely technological, regulatory and economic. Training of professionals and strengthening of
institutional structures are the two critical areas in which aid donors can assist the developing
countries [Buckley, 1991]. The OECD [OECD, 1995a], for example, regards co-ordination andharmonisation of donor approaches to the formulation and implementation of sustainable
development activities as key factors for improving the effectiveness, efficiency and quality of
development co-operation. Measures proposed for improving co-ordination include setting realistic
goals; better information networks; the recognition that people count; training of relevant donor
and recipient personnel; and the assessment of co-ordinated activities as part of professional
evaluation processes.
A key challenge in harmonising environmental plans and planning requirements is to find ways of
mutually acknowledging the substance of different plans and strategies, or even common points or
areas between different plans. It is also necessary to develop a better understanding of how sectoral
strategies relate to the overall planning framework. The translation of plans to suit different
national requirements on the basis of experience is an important measure for promotingharmonisation. For example, donors, whether bilateral or multilateral, need to be careful so that they
do not accentuate the existing problems of the recipient countries.
Inter-organisational development and networks help to facilitate both exchange of information and
resources needed for environmental problem-solving. Acting as non-hierarchical social systems,
networks permit co-operation and collaboration in implementing sustainable environmental
projects. For example, research by Lee [Lee, 1994] on community participation in the planning
process shows that, with necessary support, citizens at neighbourhood and community levels can
manage lanes, waterways, and waste collection and disposal systems; and that they can also develop
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
16/26
164
and enforce access rules and reciprocal obligations among the members of the community.
According to Carley and Christie [Carley and Christie, 1992] there are four main types of networks
serving different functions. They include policy networks that are based on the major functional
interests of the government. Such networks are characterised by stable relationships, continuity of
restricted membership, shared responsibilities for service delivery, and insulation from other
networks. Issue networks are considerably less integrated by comparison. They have a large number
of participants but a limited degree of inter-dependence. Some are based on the need to sharetechnical information, while others on shared concern over issues such as conservation of the rain
forest. Professional networks cut across policy and issue networks, while producer networks are
concerned with economic functions and relationship between the private and the public sector.
Investment in individual and team skills is one of the keys to organisational innovation for
improving the management process, not only in terms of both personnel and professional
development, but also for upgrading all other supporting organisational, institutional and legal
structures. Incentives are an important means of generating commitment. At higher levels both
networking and consensus-building must be made so stimulating and essential to good decision-
making that senior officials would not like to be left out of the process.
4.2. Case study on combating marine pollution in ports and harbours in Ghana
A summary of the main environmental concerns in the Port of Tema in Ghana and management
responses to the issues clearly illustrate the importance of systematic environmental planning of
ports in developing countries and those of Central and Eastern Europe. Until very recently, Ghana
Ports and Harbours Authority (GPHA) did not have a clear and documented environmental policy.
A draft policy exits but is still awaiting approval by the Board of Directors. GPHA has two main
ports located at Takoradi and Tema.
The Port of Tema commenced operations in 1962 and comprises the commercial port, the fishing
port and an industrial area. Through their daily operations, each of these subsystems of the port
contributes significantly to the pollution of the coastal and terrestrial environments. The Port ofTema was opened in 1962. It encloses a water area of 1,659,247 square metres and a total land area
of 3,904,754 square metres. It has 12 multipurpose berths with a maximum draft of 9.6 metres.
These berths include one oil terminal for the Tema Oil Refinery. Of the 80 per cent of the
international trade handled by the two deep-water ports of the country, the Port of Tema alone
handles 66 per cent. Imports make up 85 per cent of the trade passing through the port. Major
imports include crude oil, petroleum products and dry bulk cargo including alumina, pitch and
petroleum coke. As a result of a significant increase in shipping operations at the terminals of the
port. The vessels calling may be discharging their oily waste, sewage and garbage along the coast
and even in the ports, in the absence of any reception at the ports. Tar balls found on Ghanaian
beaches have been attributed to unlawful discharges of waste by ships in the coastal environment.
4.2.1. Existing regulations on pollution
Ghanas current vessel-source pollution prevention law is modeled on the 1954 Convention for the
Prevention of Pollution of the Sea by Oil (OILPOL 54). Under this convention, Ghanas domestic
legislation enables her to prevent discharge of oil only within 50 miles of her coast. Ghana has
ratified MARPOL 73/78 but it is not legislated into domestic law. It requires port operators to
provide oil reception facilities to enable ships to discharge or deposit oil residues. This is not so
under OILPOL 1954. Article 45 of the Ports Regulations, 1964 (LI 352) under which no ballast,
ashes, oils, pants or other objectionable matter shall be thrown overboard or allowed to escape in a
port supplements the provisions of OILPOL 54. If a master wants to discharge clear ballast, he must
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
17/26
165
first obtain a written permission of the Harbour Master. MARPOL 73/78 specification requires
Ports to provide oil reception facilities in ports. These are absent from our ports.
Oil in Navigable Waters (ONWA, 64) does not take account of the 1962 and 1969 amendments to
the 1954 Convention, which leaves Ghanas initial treaty obligations concerning ships
unimplemented. These ships may lawfully discharge oil outside the old 1954 prohibited areas (50
mile limit). The continuing oil pollution around the fishing harbour from bilges in breach of the
ONWA 64 and the port regulation 1964 calls for implementation of current conventions such as theLaw of the Sea Convention (LOSC), 1982 and MARPOL 73/78 which have been ratified by Ghana.
4.2.2. Vessel-source pollution
The port was rehabilitated during the 1980s and this resulted in an increase in the port cargo
throughput from 2.8 million metric tones in 1987 to about 5million metric tones in 1996. The total
number of vessels has also increased from 679 in 1987 to 1022 in 1993. Tanker traffic has increased
from 25 in 1987 to 110 in 1995 and 100 in 1996. All these vessels release some oil into the water
through operational discharges.
4.2.3. Risk of collision in the port
With the increase in the number of tankers, the risk or threat of pollution in the coastal environment
from vessel collision or grounding exists in or near the port areas. Emergency response facilities at
the ports are therefore necessary. The numerous minor accidents at the Volta Aluminium Company
(VALCO) berth are evidence of possible accidents occuringin the port. There is a probability of
offshore oil pollution of the coastal waters from seabed exploration and exploitation.
4.2.4. Tanker operations
Oil tankers discharge oil at the oil terminal through an oil pipeline that feeds the Tema Oil Refinery
(TOR) storage facilities. Small spillages into surrounding waters do occur. When off-loading is
completed, the disconnection of the hose between the tanker and the pipeline also results in releases
of oil into the water. The cumulative effect of these spillages on the environment could become
significant over time. Tema Port has no waste oil reception facilities even though this is a
requirement of the International Convention for the Prevention of Marine Pollution from ships and
MARPOL73/78 Protocol.
4.2.5. Vessel operations at the fishing port
The Fishing Harbour has a draft of 7 meters and can accommodate vessels up to 250 tonnes.
Smaller vessels use the inner harbour, whiles the outer harbour is built for bigger vessels. It has an
800-ton oil storage facility (Ghana Bunking Services Ltd) inside the outer Fishing Harbour. The
lines run along the quay walls and supply fuel to fishing vessels. Pollution associated with oil
discharges is a problem at the harbour.
The Fishing Harbour has a large fleet of vessels. While some of the fleet are actually engaged in
fishing, a large number of them lie idle in the port. These end up in the port for long periods and
generate a lot of bilge, which is pumped directly into the sea. There are no reception facilities in the
port and the port has been unable to monitor these vessels and to stop them from polluting the
coastal waters. Many of the small crafts laid up face the risk of sinking. The port monitors these and
whenever a list is observed on any vessel, the port takes steps to pump out any water intake. In
some instances, particularly when a vessel is lying in a traffic lane and found to be sinking, the port
authority tows and dumps in near coastal waters.
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
18/26
166
4.2.6. Oil spill emergency response plans
Ghanas Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has a national oil spill response plan in place. It
has also trained personnel who would direct any response action nationally. The Port of Tema has
adopted its own plan from the national one. To ensure the mitigation of oil spillage impacts, the port
has procured equipment for oil-spill control. This includes a dispersant pump and booms fitted on
tug boats (one each for Tema and Takoradi). The list also includes oil containment booms, floating
oil skimmer and high pressure cleaner. Periodic oil spill combating exercises are performed with theequipment on the tugboats. Training has also been provided the personnel who operate the
equipment in time of need. Regular exercises are also done by the staff of the marine operations
department in preparation for any combat action.
It must be emphasized that the technology for oil-spill response is still evolving and therefore
scientific information is needed to determine the type of equipment needed for a particular spill.
The Port Management Association of West and Central Africa (PMAWCA) is working towards the
establishment of a marine hydraulic laboratory. This will enable member ports to jointly collect and
analyse data for oil-spill and other activities.The provisions of the protocol to the Abidjan
Convention should be implemented. More importantly, the OPRC Convention should be ratified by
Ghana.
4.2.7. Land-based pollution
The port handles among others, chemicals including those for the soap industry, textile industry and
bagged fertilizers. Although the storage facilities at the terminals where these cargoes are kept are
cleaned regularly to ensure health and safety in the port environment, the wastewater is directly
discharged into the sea. The difficulty is that the type of chemicals and their potential toxicity are
not fully known by the port or other relevant agencies. Land-based pollution is caused bythe
following human activities:
a) Industries
The quantity and diversity of industrial wastes have increased without any proper waste
management practice in the country. There are about 4,000 manufacturing industries nation-wide
with about half of these classified as medium to large. Sixty per cent of these medium to large scale
industries is located within the Accra/Tema area an area which covers only one per cent of the
total land area of the country. The concentration of industries in the Accra/Tema area is a cause for
concern with regard to pollution.
Industries in Tema include the Tema oil Refinery (TOR), Volta Aluminium Company (VALCO),
textile Industries, food processing, steel works and cement works. For many of these, the Chemu
Lagoon that drains the entire industrial region of Tema is used as a receptacle for both industrial
and domestic waste. These streams of waste eventually end in the sea with their attendant adverse
effects on marine life.
TOR is said to contribute about 20 percent of industrial pollutants by weight through its refining
process. However, Act 235 of the oil in Navigable Waters (ONWA) 1964 prohibit the discharge of
oil and oily mixture within designated waters from any such operations.
b) Fish market and surrounding areas
A lot of waste is generated at the Fish Market and the surrounding areas in the Fishing Harbour. A
number of fishing companies, fish canning factories and Banks are located within the Fishing
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
19/26
167
Harbour. There is a large fish market at the Fishing Harbour for retail activities. Waste from fish
and `other food items sold in this area are collected by vehicles to a central dumping point for
burning. Some solid waste may be thrown into the seas. While their effluents are discharged into
drains leading to the sea, solid waste is dumped at a central point and burnt. At the canoe fishing
area, a similar situation occurs. Here rubbish collecting along the beach washes into the sea creating
all manner of litter. Hawking takes place at the Fishing Harbour and is a significant contributor to
solid waste generation. The port provides waste receptacles and the rubbish is removed regularly.
c) Port administration
Port administration also generates significant amounts of paper. In the absence of recycling, large
quantities of daily paper waste are dumped into bins that are later burnt
4.2.8. Capacity building Efforts
GPHA accords priority to capacity building, especially in the following areas:
a) Plant maintenance workshop
b) Civil engineering workshop
c) Electrical and marine workshops
4.2.9. Recommendations
In view of the fact that pollution problems (both vessel-source and land-based) are real in the port,
the following recommendations are made for the ports consideration and action.
a) Port Environmental policy and management
A thorough environmental policy and management plan are required for the port. These will
provide standard guidelines for ensuring pollution control in the ports terrestrial and marine
environments. The policy should include an effective environmental management system.
b) National maritime legislation
GPHA is directly supervised by the Ministry of Ports, Harbours and Railways. Under its extensive
training programme, the GPHA has trained three maritime lawyers, two of whom attended the IMO
International Maritime Law Institute. One of the ports lawyers has been involved in drafting the
new Merchant Shipping Act The port needs to liaise with the sector Ministry and the Attorney
Generals office to work towards the domestication of international conventions ratified by Ghana.
Ghana has only a few surveyors and with over a thousand vessels calling per year, their
effectiveness is hampered. GPHAs two surveyors trained at the World Maritime University in
Sweden should be designated to assist the government surveyors to inspect all vessels calling at the
port.
c) Public awareness
The port needs to undertake a public education programme for its staff and customers. This willhelp minimize the level of pollutants. Many industries appear not to be aware of the need for
protection of the environment. Key members of the port community such as industries, shipping
agencies and ship owners should be educated and requested to comply with port regulations and
international conventions.
Training in environmental issues must become a formal part of the training programmes of the port.
This is to ensure that environmental awareness is created among the rank and file of the port staff so
as to help them eliminate their own adverse or harmful environmental practices.
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
20/26
168
Steps must be taken to minimize the ports land based pollution to the sea. Strategies that will
minimize the full discharge of effluent into the sea (e.g. providing oil separators in drains currently
lead to the sea to separate off oil or oily substances on the surface of the water) must be considered.
Treatment plants for sewage, garbage and oily water must be aimed at in the long term.
d) Environmental impact assessment (EIA)
EIA has not been conducted for some of the development projects in the port and its surrounding
areas. The Environmental Protection Agency now has power to request companies to conduct EIAs.The EPA must take further steps in requesting industries within the port surrounding areas to
practice EIA. The port has to upgrade its regulation and procedure and introduce into it the
requirements for EIA. This will enable it to monitor the implementation of the EIA during the
project development stage. This is significant in the light of the free port regime being introduced
by the port.
e) Reception facilities
With regard to marine pollution in the Ports of Tema as well as current strategies for combating
marine pollution, it is apparent that vessel-source pollution, particularly in the fishing port is not
regulated. The port itself is a large generator of solid waste. The provision of reception facilities is
very important. This must be incorporated into the management plans of the port to ensure their
implementation. In the meantime, the idea of providing vehicles to receive the different kinds ofwaste must be pursued. This is actually done by the Tema Oil Refinery (TOR) on a limited scale. In
the long run, however, in view of the large amounts of waste generated by the port itself, a
treatment plant must be considered for both vessel and shore-generated wastes.
A concrete effort directed at environmental management is required to remedy this situation in the
port. It is gratifying to note that the port is taking steps to arrest the situation. Plans to draw up an
environmental management system are in progress.
4.3. Evaluation, monitoring and control
Evaluation, monitoring and control are important strategic elements in developing and
implementing environmental plans and management systems. They enable planners to keep track of
planned actions and to monitor and compare the actual performance of plans with their anticipated
performance. This process permits corrective measures to be taken as and when necessary. Taking
the case of the USA as an example, D. McAllister [McAllister, 1986] has shown how the evaluation
and monitoring of environmental actions can be inadequate; he argues that a disappointingly small
proportion of the decisions by local governments is made on the basis of systematic evaluations of
alternatives. Evaluations are often ad hoc, quick, and impressionistic. It is important for monitoring
and evaluation to pervade the whole planning process. In simple terms, the process should involve
the following inter-related steps:
identification of the problem to be addressed; design of alternative solutions to the problem;
evaluation of the alternatives; decision on actions to be taken through the appropriate political process, and the
implementation of those actions; and
monitoring of the results.The first phase of an evaluation exercise involves the definition and estimation of the various
impacts of the proposed action. This phase facilitates a good understanding of the consequences of
the action. But, at the same time, it poses a dilemma with regard to achieving coherence of the
many diverse parts of an environmental action programme. The second phase is basically a
synthesis, which attempts to solve the dilemma by integrating the impacts into an overall view so
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
21/26
169
that a judgement can be made as to whether the action should or should not be undertaken.
The evaluation process should include the following: performance monitoring to control the use of
inputs and the production of outputs; process monitoring to evaluate the efficiency andeffectiveness with which the plan is implemented; impact evaluation to estimate the quantitative
effects of the project on the socio-economic conditions of the target population; and cost-benefit
analysis to compare alternative projects in terms of their costs and benefits [Bamberger and Hewitt,
1986]. The responsibility for monitoring and evaluating environmental plans lies with theenvironment ministry (or its equivalent) and related agencies. Plans may be evaluated in-house, or
through the services of consultants for an independent perspective. In order for the evaluation to beoperationally useful, senior management must participate actively in the planning and review of the
evaluation programme. Taking the investigation of the Parliamentary Committee, Government of
Ghana, into an illegal importation of toxic plastic waste materials into that country as an example,
Box 2. high lights the importance of evaluating, monitoring and controlling environmental actions;it also provides an insight into some of the fundamental problems environmental authorities face in
the process.
Box 2: Evaluation, monitoring and control: investigation into the disposal of plastic wastematerials in Ghana by Metalloplastic (Ghana) Limited.
Metalloplastic (Ghana) Limited is a registered company in Ghana which manufactures plastic goods
from imported raw materials. The company was alleged to have illegally imported into Ghana a
quantity of cytotoxic materials from an American company, Petroco Americas Uniondale of New
York, for disposal in Ghana. On receipt of a quotation from the supplier, Metalloplastic (Ghana)
Ltd. established irrevocable letters of credit at the Bank of Ghana through the National Investment
Bank to pay for the raw materials to be imported. Socit Gnrale de Surveillance (Ghana) Ltd.
(SGS) confirmed its inspection of the cargo prior to shipment from Houston, USA, on March 9,
1992. The consignment arrived at the Port of Tema, Ghana, on April 15, 1992, and was clearedunder a certificate of urgency.
The arrival of the waste material caused a stir in the country and had to be referred to the
Parliamentary Committee on Environment, Science and Technology for investigation. The
Committees terms of reference were to determine the following: the circumstances under which
Metalloplastica (Ghana.) Ltd. imported plastic waste material into the country and cleared it from
the Tema Harbour; whether any post-shipment tests were made on the toxicity or otherwise of the
material; who approved the disposal of the waste locally and under what circumstances; whether
there was any evidence of toxicity prior to its disposal; whether a second batch of plastic waste
material imported by Metalloplastica (Ghana) Ltd. was re-exported to its supplier and, if so, under
what circumstances; why was the first batch of the plastic waste material, imported by the company,
not re-exported to the supplier; why was the Ghana Standards Board not involved in the laboratoryexamination of the plastic waste material; and any other issues incidental to the foregoing.
The following gave evidence to the Committee: forty-three witnesses from Metalloplastica (Ghana)Ltd.; the Ghana Police Service; the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of Ghana; the AccraMetropolitan Assembly (AMA); the Ghana Atomic Energy Commission (GAEC); the GhanaStandards Board (GSB); Socit Gnrale de Surveillance (Ghana) Ltd. (SGS); the Customs, Exciseand Preventive Service (CEPS) of Ghana; and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ghana. In additionto the above evidence, the Committee visited the Accra Metropolitan Waste Management
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
22/26
170
Departments landfill site to see where the material had been dumped by Metalloplastica (Ghana)Ltd.
Inspection of the cargo, which was stored in the companys warehouse, revealed that only 1,063 ofthe bags (10 percent), out of a total of 9,334, contained the imported material. This implied that 90
percent of the cargo was not meant for the manufacture of plastic products. Although the results oflaboratory tests did not establish the presence of radioactivity, the material was found to contain
heavy metals like lead and copper. Part of the cargo was also found to be cytotoxic.
In spite of these revelations, and instructions from the Ministry of Environment, Science andTechnology that the material should not be disposed of in Ghana, the EPA issued Metalloplastica(Ghana) Ltd. a licence to dump the waste in AMAs landfill site. Surprisingly, however, thecompany could not provide the Committee with any record to prove that the waste was actuallydisposed of at that site. Since it had no expertise for determining the toxicity or otherwise of thematerial, the National Toxic Waste Task Force recommended the re-exportation of the waste to thesupplier. But Metalloplastica went ahead regardless and dumped the waste at AMAs landfill inAccra.
A second consignment of plastic waste material arrived at the Port of Tema on May 10, 1992, but it
was re-exported to the supplier on June 4, 1992. A relevant question to ask here is, why was the firstconsignment not re-exported to the supplier even though 90 percent of it did not comply with thespecifications of the import order? It was established, furthermore, that Ghana did not have anyneed for such waste, neither did it have any facility for treating it. Moreover, no prior consent wasgiven by the Government of Ghana for accepting such wastes, as required under the BaselConvention.
A reason given for dumping the waste material in Ghana, contrary to instructions, was that attemptsto return it to the US exporter through the American Embassy in Ghana and Green PeaceInternational had not been successful. Also, while investigations were going on in Ghana into thecircumstances leading to the illegal importation of the waste, Petroco Americas Uniondale could nolonger be contacted in the USA.
This case shows, clearly and typically, that the evaluation, monitoring and control of environmentalactions in Ghana and many of the developing countries is far from efficient. Co-ordination of theroles of the various organisations in the country, responsible for protecting the environment, wasrather weak and poor. Indeed, the fact that the National Investment Bank and the Bank of Ghanaagreed to issue irrevocable letters of credit to Metalloplastic (Ghana) Ltd. for the import is ampleevidence of the deficiency in evaluating, monitoring and controlling environmental actions inGhana.
The lack of effective communication between and among the various organisations involved in theepisode has been a major contributory factor. For example, the Ghana Standards Board was notinformed about the arrival of the material in the country, neither was it asked to take samples for
testing. The directive issued by the EPA, authorising Metalloplastica (Ghana) Ltd. to go ahead withthe disposal of the waste in spite of instructions from the Ministry of Environment, Science andTechnology not to do so, is symptomatic of the total breakdown of the environmental decision-making process; it also illustrates vividly the lack of effective co-operation, collaboration and co-ordination among the environmental agencies in the country.
Furthermore, the capacity of these agencies and their staff to ensure effective environmentalplanning is questionable. For example, the National Toxic Waste Task Force did not have theexpertise to interpret SGS laboratory test results sent from Belgium. Also, different laboratory testresults were obtained, each capable of different interpretations, variously by the SGS, the Nogouchi
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
23/26
171
Memorial Institute for Medical Research at the University of Ghana, and the Ghana StandardsBoard. This points to a lack of uniformity in international environmental standards, as well as tolack of capacity in Ghana for evaluating, monitoring and controlling environmental actions. Finally,the reluctance of both the American Embassy in Accra and Green Peace International to help re-export the first consignment of the waste to the US supplier highlights the problems of international
co-operation and co-ordination in matters of environmental protection.
Source: Parliament house, 1994
5. CONCLUSION
The crucial need for integrating the environment into developmental planning in a holistic manner
has been highlighted in this paper. Such an approach, it is argued, would help arrest the rapid
decline of the earths natural resources and restore the health of the environment in the long-term.
In order to do this effectively, a deep understanding of the environment as a system is needed,
together with access to essential information, basic methodologies, and appropriate instruments of
environmental planning and management. Being organisations that heavily impact the environment
and communities in their neighbourhood, ports and harbours in Bulgaria need to do environmental
planning in a more systematic and effective manner.
In addition, the application of strategic planning and management to environmental planning and
management of ports in Bulgaria is proposed as an appropriate conceptual framework for enhancing
their environmental management practices. The conceptual framework includes environmental
education; training; greater participation of the key actors and the general public in planning and
management processes; facilitating effective co-operation and partnerships between and amongst
the different ports and countries of the world; harmonising policies and plans at all levels; and
building human and institutional capacity for the sustainable development of ports and harbour
areas.
The planning process needs to guarantee the right of all to participate. Environmental information
should be reduced to a form in which it is easy to understand, and it should be easily accessible.
Future environmental plans should be made more relevant and cost-effective on a national, regionaland global scale. Thus, effective environmental planning, especially to deal with trans-boundary
problems, would require investment in the environment beyond national and regional boundaries.
In order to ensure this, port and harbour employees responsible for planning should have access to
effective environmental education and training to enable them to acquire the necessary scientific
and multi-disciplinary skills. Environmental planners of ports and harbours in Bulgaria must be
skilled in integrating new environmental fields into the planning process. They should also develop
their capacity for integrating the different contributions to the process in terms of general points of
departure, time spans, ways of formulating hypotheses, and uncertainties which inevitably are
attached to environmental problems. It is equally important for them to be able to present the
conclusions of their plans in a simple and succinct way for the attention and scrutiny of both the
public and decision-makers. Strategic environmental planning is a very useful analytical tool in this
regard. Finally, environmental plans would become effective instruments for improving the
environment only if they are subjected to continuing and systematic evaluation, monitoring and
control. This process should include performance monitoring, process monitoring, impact
evaluation, and cost-benefit analysis of the vision, objectives, targets, triggers, action plans and
institutional roles.
8/13/2019 Environmental Planning and Renovation of Ports and Harbours in Bulgaria
24/26
172
REFERENCES
Baldwin, J.H.,Environmental Planning and Management, Boulder, Westview, Co., p. 4, 1985.
Bamberger, M. and Hewitt, E., Monitoring and Evaluating Urban Development Programmes: A Handbook
for Managers and Researchers, Washington, D.C., USA, The World Bank, p. 23-24, 1986.
Bardwell, L.V., Problem-framing: a perspective on environmental problem-solving, Environmental
Management 15 (5), p 603,1991.
Beer, A.R.,Environmental Planning for Site Development, London, Chapman and Hall, p. 18-21,1990.
Benveniste, G.,Mastering the Politics of Planning, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1989.
Buckley, R.,Perspectives in Environmental Management, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, p. 24-29, 1991.
Carley, M. and Christie, I., Managing Sustainable Development, London, Earthscan Publications Ltd., p.
149; 150; 165; 169; 188; 193, 1992.
Cayer, N.J. and Weschler, L.F., Public Administration: Social Change and Adaptive Management, New
York, St. Martins Press, p. 94, 1988.
Chechile, R.A. and Carlisle, S., Environmental Decision Making: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, New
York, Van Nostrand Reinhold, p. 270-272, 1991.
Clark, B.D. Environmental assessment and environmental management, inProceedings of 10th InternationalSeminar on Environmental Impact Assessment and Management, July 9-22, Scotland, UK, University ofAberdeen, 1989.
Compton, P., Introduction, in B. Nath, L. Hens and D. Devuyst (eds) Environmental Management, Vol. 1:The Compartmental Approach, Brussels, Belgium, VUBPress, p. 20, 1993.
Daneke, G.A., Energy, Economics, and the Environment: Towards a Comprehensive Perspective, D.C.Health and Company, p. 1271982.
Darke, R., Procedural planning theory, in I. Masser (ed.), Evaluating Urban Planning Efforts, Aldershot,Hampshire, Gower, p. 16-35, 1983.
Devuyst, D., Environmental impact assessment, in B. Nath, L. Hens and D. Devuyst (eds), Environmental
Management, Vol. 1: The Compartmental Approach, Brussels, Belgium, VUBPress, p. 151, 1993.
Faludi, A.,Planning Theory, Oxford, Pergamon Press, p. 306, 1973.
Faludi, A.,A Decision-centred View of Environmental Planning, Oxford, Pergamon Press, p. 52; 57-59; 179;
182, 1987.
Field, B.C.,Environmental Economics: An Introduction, New York, McGraw-Hill, Inc., p. 422-442, 1994.
Hudson, B.M., Comparison of Current Planning Theories: Counterparts and Contradictions, Journal of theAmerican Planning Association, p. 387-398, 1999.
Jain, R.K. and Hutchings, B.L., Environmental Impact Analysis: Emerging Issues in Planning, Urban,
University of Illinois Press, p. 65; 73; 10, 1978.
Lee, Yok Shui F., Community-Based Urban Environmental Management: Local NGOs as Catalysts,
Regional Development Dialogue15 (2), Autumn, p. 164, 1994.
McAllister, D.M.,Evaluation in Environmental Planning: Assessing Environmental, Social, Economic, andPolitical Trade-offs, Cambridge, The MIT Press, p. 4-7, 1986.
Mintzberg, H., The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, Hemel Hempstead, Prentice Hall International Ltd.,
p.