Post on 13-Jan-2016
description
transcript
1
Family Community ParticipationThe Results of a New Survey and
Implications for Practice
Poster Session Presented at AFP 2005 Beach Center on Disability
University of Kansaswww.beachcenter.org
Denise Poston and Nina Zuna
With assistance from
Kandace Fleming, George Gotto, Janet Marquis,
and Jean Ann Summers
2© Beach Center on Disability
Families of children with disabilities feel isolated.Communities provide supports, services, social connections, a sense of belonging, recreation, employment, and education.However, many families of children with disabilities can’t access all their community has to offer due to the barriers they face.But, we don’t know what exactly the barriers are and what families want to do, but can’t.
What We Know About Families’ Ability to Participate in Their Community
3© Beach Center on Disability
Research Questions
Survey development as part of a larger research program – what are the impact of policies on families?How satisfied are families with their ability to participate in community activities?What challenges do families experience?What are the relationships between activities, barriers, and overall community participation?What are the relationships between family community participation and family quality of life?
4© Beach Center on Disability
Developing the Survey
Literature review – participation, integration, isolationLiterature on the ability of people with disabilities to access community servicesConceptualizing family community participation Activities Barriers Overall community participation Sense of belonging
Focus groups with familiesInitial survey with telephone interviews – revised survey
5© Beach Center on Disability
Sample332 families of children with disabilities
Recruited from 11 DD agencies and 34 schools in 8 states (CA, HI, IN, LA, NM, TX, VA), and an information fair for families in CO
The families• 91% female
• 53% employed full or part time
• 53% earned <25k, 30% 25-60k, 17% 60k
• 62% non-white
The children• Autism – 23%
• Mental retardation – 23%
• Developmental delay – 9%
6© Beach Center on Disability
Family Community Activities (FCA)
Families rated their satisfaction with their ability to participate in community activities
Activities included recreation, leisure, employment, social, spiritual
3-point scale; tied directly to child’s disability“We can’t do this as much as we want because
of our child’s disability”1= Dissatisfied; 2 = Somewhat satisfied; 3 = Very satisfied
7© Beach Center on Disability
Family Community Activities (CFA)MoviesGoing out to eatReligious activitiesWatching sporting eventsParksSwimming poolShoppingGetting together with family and friendsQuiet, indoor things (museums)Active, outdoor things (camping)Working outside the homeJoining hobby club or class
8© Beach Center on Disability
Family Community Activities (FCA)
Overall results Mean = 2.36 Standard Deviation = .487
Generally, satisfaction with participation in community activities was slightly above somewhat satisfied.Generally, families are more satisfied with their participation in outdoor, active, less structured activities than indoor, quiet, structured activities
1 = Dissatisfied; 2 = Somewhat satisfied; 3 = Very satisfied.
9© Beach Center on Disability
Challenges to Community Participation (CCP)
Families rate the extent to which statements are a problem for their family in that it prevents them from participating in their community
Problems are related to the child’s disability, family resources, community acceptance, and accessibility
3-point scale1= Not much; 2 = Somewhat; 3 = Big problem
10© Beach Center on Disability
Challenges to Community Participation (CCP)Unfriendly peoplePhysical accessibilityChild’s behaviorNoisy or crowded environmentTransportationToo busy caring for childCommunity too smallCommunity not safeNo childcare for children without disabilitiesNo special childcare or respite for child with disabilityPeople don’t speak our languageNot enough money**Child’s health**Not adequate cognitive accommodations for my child
11© Beach Center on Disability
Challenges to Community Participation (CCP)
Overall results Mean = 1.60 Standard deviation = .42
Generally, families rated challenges as slightly below “Somewhat of a problem.”
1 = Not much; 2 = Somewhat; 3= A big problem
Lack of money, child’s behavior, and overly stimulating environment were biggest problems
12© Beach Center on Disability
Overall Community SatisfactionHow satisfied are families that their community makes them feel that
they belong? Mean = 3.53 Standard deviation = 1.16
with their level of participation in their community?
Mean = 3.48 Standard deviation = 1.12
Scale: On a continuum from 1= Very Dissatisfied to 5 = Very Satisfied
13© Beach Center on Disability
Relationships (Correlations)
The lower the scores on challenges (CCP) (least problematic), the higher the scores on activities (FCA) (the more satisfied families were with their ability to participate in specific activities). (r = -.345)
The lower the scores on challenges, the higher the scores on overall satisfaction with belonging in the community. (r = -.432)
The lower the scores on challenges, the higher the scores on overall satisfaction with their ability to participate in the community. (r = -.413)
14© Beach Center on Disability
Relationships with FQOL
The lower the scores on challenges (CCP), the higher the scores on family quality of life domains. Family Interaction r = -.265 Parenting r = -.227 Emotional Well-being r = -.376 Physical / Material Well-being r = -.422 Disability-Related Support r = -.390
15© Beach Center on Disability
Group Differences - Employment
2 groups - employed - unemployed No significant differences were found for employment
status on activities (FCA) Mean = 2.4, 2.3, respectively F(1,275) = .149 p = .699
There was a significant difference in mean scores for employment status on challenges (CCP)
Mean = 1.6, 1.7, respectively F(1,305) = 4.34 p < .05 2=.014 (small effect size)
16© Beach Center on Disability
Disability Levels 3 levels - Mild/unknown – moderate – severe/very severeThere are differences among the disability levels The omnibus ANOVA was significant for group differences on
FCA for three disability levels Mean = 2.5, 2.4, 2.2 respectively F(2,267) = 6.47 p <.01 2=.047 (Small-medium effect size)
The omnibus ANOVA was not significant for group differences on CCP for three disability levels Mean = 1.7, 1.6, 1.6 respectively F(2, 299) = 1.78 p = .17
17© Beach Center on Disability
Disability Types 3 types - Emotional/Behavioral – Cognitive – Physical / SensoryThere are differences among the disability types The omnibus ANOVA was significant for group differences on FCA for
three disability types Mean = 2.2, 2.5, 2.3 respectively F(2,230) = 11.21 p <.001 2=.09 (Medium effect size)
The omnibus ANOVA was significant for group differences on CCP for three disability types Mean = 1.7, 1.5, 1.6 respectively F(2,255) = 4.01 p <.05 2=.031 (Small effect size)
18© Beach Center on Disability
Family Education Level7 Levels – ranging from no HS graduation to graduate degreeThere are differences among the education levels related to challenges– generally more challenges are associated with less education The omnibus ANOVA was not significant for group differences on FCA
for 7 education levels F(6,272) = .975 p = .443
The omnibus ANOVA was significant for group differences on CCP for 7 education levels F(6,303) = 3.31 p <.01 2=.063 (Medium effect size)
19© Beach Center on Disability
Family Income Level3 levels – <25k – 25-60k - > 60kThere are differences among the income levels related to activities The omnibus ANOVA was significant for group differences on FCA for 3
income levels Mean = 2.3, 2.5, 2.2 respectively F(2,261) = 6.30 p <.01 2=.047 (Small-medium effect size)
The omnibus ANOVA was not significant for group differences on CCP
for 3 income levels Mean = 1.6, 1.6, 1.6 respectively F(2,293) = .727 p = .484
20© Beach Center on Disability
Applications for the Family Community Integration Survey
Planning supports for individual familiesEvaluating agencies or programs Community needs assessmentConducting researchHow could you use the FCI survey and other Beach Center tools in your agency?Just ask us! E-mail denisep@ku.edu
21© Beach Center on Disability
Implications for Practice
Consider how IFSP/IEP goals might support a family’s ability to participate in their community.How can you be a “door opener” for a family of a child with a disability? Can you provide training to community organizations on how to integrate children with disabilities and their families?
22© Beach Center on Disability
Next Steps in this Line of Research
Asking more detailed questions Which community integration factors best predict a high family
quality of life? Are some families more likely to be more integrated than others? Are some communities more likely to be more “welcoming” than
others? What types of policies, services, and supports facilitate
integration of both individuals and families?
Based on the answers to these questions, building a data base of “what works” in terms of integrating families of children with disabilities in our communities is a future goal.