±

Limit of

Unsteady HEC-RASModel

£¤81 !(294 ¤£81

£10 £¤10 ¤!(10 §¦̈94 ?A@336

§̈¦94

£¤81

§̈¦29 £¤75

*#

!(

Floodplain with or without Project (Based on #100-yr Flood = 33,000 cfs) *

New 100-year Floodplain with Project *# !(100-year Floodplain Removed with Project(i.e., Benefitted Area)

*#Pre-Task Force With Project 100-year Floodplain !(46 *#

Upstream Mitigation Structures )" Residential !( Non-Residential

Cemetery Impact !(

!( Impacted by Plan A, Not Impacted by Plan B *#

*# Impacted by Plan A and Plan B !( *#

Organ(!ic Farms (Impacts To Be Determined)18

Organic Farms (No Longer Impacted with Plan B)Diversion ChannelPlan B AlignmentPlan A Southern EmbankmentLeveeRiver Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN,

GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

FM Area Diversion Project Plan B vs. Plan A Comparison 0 1 2 4

Miles CreatedBy:enelson DateCreated:01/19/2018 DateExported:4/6/2018 Image:2012CountyNAIP ElevationData: -CoordinateSystem:NAD1983UTMZone14N Datum:NorthAmerican1983 µ H:\Fargo\JBN\7400\7438\13_7438_015\MinnesotaDam Safety Permit\SmallTeam\2017-11-13TechAdvisory Com\GIS\Mapping_BG_Overal031618.mxd April 2018