Findings of Congress The Endangered Species Act is the last resort for species at risk of...

Post on 29-Jan-2016

212 views 0 download

Tags:

transcript

Findings of Congress

• The Endangered Species Act is the last resort for species at risk of extinction.

• Under the ESA, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) is accountable to ensure that salmon and marine species are preserved for future generations.

Scope of FederalSalmon Recovery

Initiatives

WASHINGTON

IDAHO

OREGON

MONTANA

Snake River

Columbia River

Listed Salmon & Steelhead

Chum (1 Stock)

Sockeye (1 Stock)

Chinook (5 Stocks)

Steelhead (5 Stocks)

Federal Dams

Non-Federal Dams

Canadian Dams

Dams without Fish Passage

Salmon & Steelhead Range Affected by Lower Snake River Dams

Effects of Dams on Salmonids

• Restrict access to habitat• Alter habitat• Alter hydrology• Alter gradient• Passage hazard• Creates recreational opportunities and

expectations. • Creates opportunities for further water

development within the basin.

Actions called for in NMFS’ biological opinions

• Dam Operations• Spill at Dams• Flow Measures• Transportation• Dam Modifications• Research Monitoring & Evaluation• Hatcheries• Habitat

Status of Adult Passage

• Successful for adult salmon, generally in the range of 98% conversion per dam.

• Lamprey passage success is poor

• Sturgeon passage is poor

Turbine Survival

• Varies by project

• Survival range is 85 to 100%

• Most projects are in the range of 90%

Most fish are transported

• 1993-2006– 60-99% of non-tagged stream-type

Chinook– 70-99% of non-tagged steelhead

Transport study results

• Transportation appears to benefit hatchery stream-type Chinook and steelhead

• Transportation does not appear to greatly benefit wild stream-type Chinook

Spillway Survival

• Spillway survival varies by project

• Survival range is 90 to 100%

• Most projects are in the upper 90% range

Bypass Survival

• Varies by project

• Range of survival is 90 to 100%

• Most projects are in the mid to upper 90% range.

Wild chinook salmon

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 20050.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

1 2 3 4Number of detections

Notdetected

* P<0.05

2.5

3.5

4.5

5.5LGR only

*

** * **

** *ns**

**

*

% of fish in thenot-detectedcategory

13.6 28.8 29.3 17.5 14.1 29.6 1.0 24.8 26.9 7.9 4.0

Year of outmigration

Rela

tive r

etu

rn r

ate

s to

Low

er

Gra

nite

Dam

Flow Management Program

• Spring Season– Yearling migrants

• Summer Season– Subyearling migrants

Spring Flow Management

• Largely achieved by having reservoirs operate no lower than their flood control rule curves by April 10.

• Rationale is it passes the freshet into the river as opposed to refilling reservoir space.

Historic estimated juvenile chinook traveltime from Lewiston to Bonneville Dam

(after Raymond 1979)

0

10

20

30

40 no dams

Low flow Moderate flow High FlowSnake R. (35-53 kcfs) (71-106 kcfs) (106-177 kcfs)

Columbia R. (141-177 kcfs) (212-318 kcfs) (353-494 kcfs)

Tra

vel t

ime

(d

ays

)

Estimated yearling chinook travel time -Lewiston to Bonneville Dam

0

10

20

30

40no dams4 dams8 dams

Low flow Moderate flow High FlowSnake R. (35-53 kcfs) (71-106 kcfs) (106-177 kcfs)

Columbia R. (141-177 kcfs) (212-318 kcfs) (353-494 kcfs)

Tra

vel t

ime

(d

ays

)

Basis for Managing Flow

• Evolutionary Considerations

• Recognition there was a flow/travel time relationship for juvenile salmon.

• Data suggesting survival benefits over the life cycle of salmon (SARs).

• Beneficial effects of a freshwater plume to estuary and near ocean environmental processes.

Flow Objectives

• Flow levels sought during the spring juvenile migration.

• Columbia River

Spring: 220 – 260 kcfs depending on runoff volume

Snake River

Spring: 85 – 100 kcfs depending on runoff

Recent and Near Term Project Modifications

• Lower Monumental Dam RSW - 2008

• Spill Wall extension at The Dalles – 2008

• Ice Harbor RSW – 2005

• Bonneville Corner Collector - 2004

• The Dalles Spillway Wall – 2008

• John Day Surface Bypass - 2008

Chinook salmon

1965 1970 1975 1980

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

1995 2000

Nodata

Outmigration year

Est

imat

ed h

ydro

pow

ersy

stem

sur

viva

l

1970 1980 1990 20000

1

2

3

4

5

6

2-oceanonly

Raymond (1988)

afterPetrosky et al.(2001)

Williams et al. (2005)(updated)

Estimated Snake River wild spring-summerchinook salmon returns (escapement to upperSnake River dam + catch)

CSS PIT

Outmigration year

Sm

olt-

to-a

du

lt re

turn