Post on 24-Jun-2015
description
transcript
1Marquette University
Re-Thinking Information Literacy Training with Brightspace and SCORM
2Marquette University
3Marquette University
Describe the partnership that lead to use of
Brightspace and SCORM.
Demonstrate how this tandem worked in practice
Explore what was learned and next steps.
Overview
4Marquette University
First Year English
5Marquette University
FYE Unit 2 Assignment
6Marquette University
Library Role in FYE Program
7Marquette University
Changes Brings Opportunity
8Marquette University
Toward an Embedded ModelDevelop
assignmentsGrading Multiple IL
sessionsMultiple
librariansCo-teaching Identified
as IL expertFocus on IL skill
developmentFocus on course IL outcomes
Entry Level X X X X
Twin Pack X X X X X
Immersion(PBL)
X X X X X X
Co-teaching X X X X X X X
Co-teaching (not IL expert)
X X X X X X
Meagan Bowler, Kori Street, (2008) "Investigating the efficacy of embedment: experiments in information literacy integration", Reference Services Review,
Vol. 36 Iss: 4, pp.438 – 449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00907320810920397
9Marquette University
Integrating E-Learning
go.mu.edu/english1001-cites
10Marquette University
What About Assessment?
11Marquette University
What is SCORM? Why Use it?
Graphic by Laura Shearshttp://www.lsquaredmath.us/scormQuest/
12Marquette University
Scaling Up for Fall of 2014
Ask all FYE instructors to use Introduction to Academic Research.
Develop additional topic specific SCORM packages.
Create documentation and offer technical and teaching support.
13Marquette University
Theory into Practice
Short, focused lessons.
Use conversational instead of formal style.
Offer practice opportunities.
Give learners control, but not too much.
14Marquette University
Rollout of SCORM Packages
http://mu.edu/library/lor/first-year-english/
15Marquette University
16Marquette University
Results From Fall 2014Sections that used @ least 1 package 45 out of 80
Sections that used more than 1 package 12 out of 45
Sections that used the Intro Web version 5 out of 45
Sections with package loaded but not done 3 out of 45
Number of students in all sections 1580
Students in a SCORM section 706(44% participation)
Students in a SCORM section that completed the SCORM package
482 (68% completion)
17Marquette University
What We Learned
Focus on Friendraising.
Seek Seamless Integration.
Using the SCORM data can be a challenge.
Technology by itself is not the solution.
18Marquette University
Next Steps
Explore blanket IRB for Library.
Examine ways to do this with other introductory programs, i.e. History, Chemistry, etc.
Implore D2L to make it easier to export SCORM data and to support Tin Can API.
19Marquette University
What questions do you have?Eric Kowalik | eric.kowalik@marquette.edu | 414.288.4144