Post on 25-Jul-2020
transcript
Draft
Many Non-elite Endurance Multisport Athletes Do Not Meet
Sports Nutritional Recommendations for Carbohydrates
Journal: Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Manuscript ID apnm-2015-0599.R1
Manuscript Type: Article
Date Submitted by the Author: 08-Jan-2016
Complete List of Authors: Masson, Geneviève; INAF - Universite Laval, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences Lamarche, Benoît; Université Laval, INAF
Keyword: dietary intake < diet, sports nutrition < nutrition, triathlon, carbohydrate, protein
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
1
Many Non-elite Endurance Multisport Athletes Do Not Meet Sports Nutritional
Recommendations for Carbohydrates
Authors
Geneviève Masson1, Benoît Lamarche1
1. Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods (INAF), Laval University, 2440 Hochelaga
Blvd, Quebec, QC, Canada
Corresponding author:
Benoît Lamarche Ph.D. Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods (INAF) Pavillon des Services, bureau 2549 2440 Hochelaga Blvd. Quebec, Canada G1V 0A6 Tel.: (418) 656-2131 ext. 4355, Fax: (418) 656-5877 E-Mail: benoit.lamarche@fsaa.ulaval.ca GM: genevieve.masson.1@ulaval.ca BM: benoit.lamarche@fsaa.ulaval.ca
Page 1 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
2
Abstract
Little is known regarding the dietary intakes of non-elite athletes involved in endurance
multisport events. The primary objective of this observational study was to characterize
the dietary intake of non-elite athletes participating in winter triathlon (snowshoeing,
skating and cross-country skiing), winter pentathlon (winter triathlon sports + cycling and
running), Ironman (IM- swimming, cycling, running) and half-distance Ironman (IM70.3)
in relation with current sports nutrition recommendations. A total of 116 non-elite athletes
(32 women and 84 men) who have participated in one of those events in 2014 were
included in the analyses. Usual dietary intake was assessed using an online validated
food frequency questionnaire. Participants (22-66 years old) trained on average (± SD)
14.8 ± 5.3 hours/week. Only 45.7% [95% confidence interval, 36.4-55.2%] of all athletes
reported consuming the recommended intakes for CHO, with highest proportions
(66.7%) seen in IM athletes. On the other hand, 87.1% [79.6-92.6%] of all non-elite
athletes reported consuming at least 1.2 g protein/kg/d while 66.4% [57.0-74.9%]
reported consuming more than 1.6 g protein/kg/d, again with highest values (84.6%)
among IM athletes. There was no difference in the proportion of athletes achieving the
CHO and protein intakes between men and women. These findings suggest that many
endurance multisport non-elite athletes do not meet the current recommendations for
carbohydrates, emphasizing the need for targeted nutritional education. Further
research is needed to examine how under-reporting of food intake may have affected
those estimates.
Page 2 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
3
Keywords
Endurance sports nutrition, triathlon, multisport event, dietary intake, carbohydrate,
protein.
Page 3 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
4
Résumé
Peu d’études ont documenté les apports alimentaires d’athlètes d’endurance de niveau
non-élites participant à des épreuves multisports. Cette étude visait à évaluer les
apports alimentaires d’athlètes non-élites prenant part à un triathlon d’hiver (raquette,
patinage et ski de fond), pentathlon des neiges (sports du triathlon d’hiver + vélo et
course à pied), Ironman (IM – natation, vélo et course à pied) et demi-Ironman (IM70,3)
par rapport aux plus récentes recommandations en nutrition sportive. Au total, 116
athlètes non-élites (32 femmes et 84 hommes) ayant participé à une des ces épreuves
en 2014 ont été inclus dans les analyses. Les apports usuels ont été évalués à l’aide
d’un questionnaire de fréquence alimentaire en ligne validé. Les participants (22-66 ans)
s’entrainaient en moyenne (±É-T) 14,8±5,3 heures/semaine. Seulement 45,7%
[intervalle de confiance 95%, 36,4-55,2%] des athlètes ont rapporté avoir des apports en
glucides supérieurs à la valeur recommandée pour les sports d’endurance (6 g/kg/j). Par
ailleurs, 87.1% [79.6-92.6%] et 66.4% [57.0-74.9%] des athlètes non-élites ont rapporté
consommer plus de 1.2 g protéines/kg/j et 1.6 g protéines/kg/j respectivement. Les
athlètes IM sont ceux qui rencontrent en plus grande proportion les recommandations
en glucides (66.7%) et en protéines (84.6%). Il n’y avait pas de différence dans le
pourcentage d’hommes et de femmes qui rencontraient les recommandations en
glucides et protéines. Ces résultats suggèrent que plusieurs athlètes d’endurance
multisports non-élites ne rencontrent pas les recommandations en glucides, soulignant
les besoins en éducation nutritionnelle dans cette population. L’impact possible d’une
sous-estimation des apports alimentaires doit être investigué davantage.
Page 4 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
5
Mots clés
Triathlon, sports d’endurance, évènement multisports, protéine, glucide, apport
alimentaire
Page 5 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
6
Introduction
Endurance multisport events have recently gained in popularity. The number of
long distance triathlon events such as half-Ironman (IM 70.3) (1.9 km swim, 90 km bike,
21.1 km run) and Ironman (IM) (3.8 km swim, 180 km bike, 42.2 km run) has increased
in the past years, attracting more and more non-elite athletes (Whyte 2014).
Competitions combining different sports held in winter conditions also attract more non-
elite athletes than ever before. The Pentathlon des Neiges (PENT) is a relatively new
winter event that is not yet as standardized as the IM events, consisting of cycling (with
distance ranging from 9-15 km), running (3.6-5.5 km), cross-country skiing (4.9-8 km),
ice-skating (5-8.4 km) and snowshoeing (3.4-5.1 km). The Quebec ITU Winter Triathlon
(ITU TRI) includes 5 km of snowshoeing, 12 km of ice-skating and 8 km of cross-country
skiing).
In order to compete in such multisport endurance events, athletes have to train
for different sports (i.e. swimming, biking and running) over long hours, sometimes with
multiple exercise sessions a day (Jeukendrup et al. 2005). With an average weekly
training time of 14 hours (Gianoli et al. 2012; Rust et al. 2013), non-elite endurance
multisport athletes have high energy expenditures (Bentley et al. 2008; Jeukendrup et al.
2005). Athletes are advised to consume a nutrient dense diet that provides enough
energy to achieve energy balance (Rodriguez et al. 2009) while maximizing training
adaptions and optimizing recovery between exercise sessions.
Authors have suggested that recommendations regarding dietary carbohydrates
should be expressed relative to body weight rather than as a proportion of the daily
energy intake (Burke et al. 2001). Daily carbohydrate needs of endurance athletes who
train between 1 to 3 hours a day have been estimated at 6 to 10 g/kg of body weight
Page 6 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
7
(Burke et al. 2011; Rodriguez et al. 2009). Recommendations for daily protein intake for
endurance athletes range from 1.2 to 1.4 g/kg of body weight (Rodriguez et al. 2009).
However, some athletes may need as much as 1.6 g protein/kg of body weight to
achieve neutral nitrogen balance (Brouns et al. 1989a; Brouns et al. 1989b; Friedman
and Lemon 1989; Tarnopolsky 2004; Tarnopolsky et al. 1988).
Although dietary intakes of elite and non-elite cyclists and runners during training
have been documented quite extensively, less is known regarding dietary intakes of
non-elite multisport endurance athletes. To the best of our knowledge, no study has yet
documented the dietary intake of winter multisport endurance athletes. The main
purpose of this observational study was to assess the dietary intake of non-elite
multisport endurance athletes during the weeks leading to their competition, with
particular focus on proteins and carbohydrates. More specifically, we assessed the
degree to which participants meet the most recent dietary recommendations for
endurance sports, with interest in potential differences between male and female
athletes and among multisport endurance events. We hypothesized that a majority of
non-elite multisport endurance athletes meets the recommended intakes for protein and
carbohydrates and that intake is influenced by sex and event type.
Page 7 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
8
Methods
Participants
To be eligible for this study, athletes had to be 18 years and older. They also had
to compete in an age-group category of one of the following multisport endurance
events: Pentathlon des Neiges 2014 tandem or solo categories (PENT) (9-15 km of
cycling, 3.6-5.5 km of running, 4.9-8 km of cross-country skiing, 5-8.4 km of ice skating
and 3.4-5.1 km snowshoeing), Quebec ITU Winter Triathlon in 2014 (ITU TRI) (5 km of
snowshoeing, 12 km of ice skating and 8 km of cross-country skiing), Ironman 70.3
triathlon held in Mont-Tremblant in 2014 (IM 70.3), Ironman 70.3 World Championships
held in Mont-Tremblant in 2014 (WC IM 70.3) or in the Ironman Triathlon held in Mont-
Tremblant in 2014 (IM). Athletes were recruited through events’ emailing list, Triathlon
Québec (Quebec Federation of Triathlon) members’ emailing list and by the presence of
one of the investigators on competition site. A total of 297 athletes were recruited. Of
this number, 160 subjects completed all questionnaires. All participants provided
informed consent either online or in written form. The Clinical Research Ethics
Committee of Laval University approved this study protocol (#2013-274).
Questionnaires
Athletes had to complete different online questionnaires, which were available in
French and in English. A general information questionnaire was used to obtain socio-
demographic information and to assess medical condition. A validated online food
frequency questionnaire (FFQ) available both in French and English was used to assess
food intake during the previous month (Labonte et al. 2012). A sports food and
supplement questionnaire was used to assess the frequency of use in the previous
Page 8 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
9
month as well as quantity of sports food and supplements typically consumed by
endurance athletes: sports gel and candies or chews, caffeine pills, sodium tabs,
hydration drinks and bars. An average nutritional value was calculated for each type of
supplement by using the nutritional facts of different brands of products available in
Canada and/or the United States. Energy and macronutrients intakes were calculated by
adding the dietary intakes provided by the FFQ and intakes related to the consumption
of sports foods and supplements. Training habits and history over the preceding month
were also assessed. More specifically, subjects reported total and sport-specific training
time along with the proportion of training done at intensity perceived as being higher
than 80% of maximal capacity. Subjects enrolled in the study provided their full names
and identified the sport event they participated in. The performance rank was calculated
as a percentile of the participant’s rank position in his/her age and sex category using
data publicly available on the Sportstats.ca website.
Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed with SAS (version 9.3; SAS Institute Inc., Cary,
NC, USA). A total of 41 participants completed the FFQ more than 14 days after
competing in their multisport event. They were excluded from the analyses because of
highly probable changes in dietary habit post event. The winter multisport events
(Pentathlon and ITI Triathlon) were combined as WINTER since type and duration of
events are similar, thereby increasing the sample size of the winter multisport event
group. Differences among sport event’s groups (groups) were assessed by ANOVA for
parametric variables and by Chi-Square for non-parametric variables. In case of
statistically difference with ANOVA, Duncan tests were also used to assess between-
Page 9 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
10
group differences. Student’s unpaired T-test and Chi-square test were used to assess
differences between sexes. Logistic regression analysis (P < 0.15 inclusion method) was
used to estimate the odds of meeting the dietary recommendations for carbohydrates
and proteins in the various groups. Models were adjusted for energy intake and
WINTER athletes were used as the reference group. Multiple regression analysis was
used to identify the main correlates of energy intake relative to body weight. Self-
reported energy intakes exceeding the group mean by two SD or more were considered
improbable and subjects with such values were excluded (N=3). To account for the
possibility of under-reporting, a sensitivity analysis was undertaken while considering
only participants with self-reported energy intake above their estimated energy
requirement (EER) based on conservative physical activity coefficients (PAL) for both
low active (EER LOW) and active (EER ACTIVE) levels for each participants (Health
Canada 2010). Two-tailed P values <0.05 were considered significant.
Page 10 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
11
Results
Subjects’ characteristics are presented in Table 1. More than one quarter of the
subjects included in the analyses were women (27.6%), the lowest proportion being in
the IM group. The majority of subjects (73.0%) were Canadians although differences in
nationality were observed among groups. Athletes recruited were aged from 22 to 66
years without significant difference in mean age between groups. Weekly training time
was significantly higher in athletes competing in IM and WC IM 70.3 than in other
groups. The WINTER group trained fewer hours than the other three groups, although
in relative terms at the highest perceived intensity. The mean performance rank by age
category (44% to 52%) was similar among all groups, and values reflected the non-elite
status of the participants. Most athletes (70.7%) occupied a full-time job at the time of
investigation. Small proportions of athletes reported having food intolerance (17.0%) or
particular food habits such as vegetarianism (12.7%), without difference among event
groups (P=0.31 and P=0.27, respectively, not shown). Women were more likely to report
having food intolerance (34.5% vs. 9.9%, P<0.01) and particular food habits (23.3% vs.
8.8%, P=0.04) in comparison with men.
Self-reported dietary intake data are shown in Table 2. On average, participants
completed the dietary questionnaires 6.4 days after the multisport event although the
completion time varied between 11 days before the sporting event to 14 days after. Total
energy intake (kcal/d) in IM athletes was significantly higher than in WINTER and IM
70.3 athletes, but similar to that reported by WC IM 70.3 athletes. Carbohydrate intakes
(in g/d and in g/kg/day) were significantly higher in IM athletes than in the other three
multisport groups. Protein intakes in g/kg/d were higher in WC IM 70.3 and IM athletes
Page 11 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
12
than in WINTER athletes. Sports food and supplements contributed approximately 8.3%
of total energy intake, mostly in the form of carbohydrates. Sports food and supplements
contributed only 2.8% of total protein intake, without significant differences among
groups. The different categories of supplements used by athletes are shown in
supplementary table S1. Dietary fat contributed to a significantly greater proportion of
total energy intake in WC IM 70.3 athletes than in the other three multisport groups.
Alcohol intake in relative terms, but not in absolute terms, contributed a greater
proportion of energy intake among WINTER and IM 70.3 athletes than among IM
athletes.
Total energy intake was higher in men than in women (3501 ± 1192 kcal vs. 2652
± 731 kcal, P<0.01), but energy intakes relative to body weight were similar between
sexes (men 47.7 ± 17.0 vs. women 45.4 ± 13.5 kcal/kg/d, P=0.50). Carbohydrate intakes
relative to body weight did not differ by sex (men 6.3 ± 2.5 g/kg/d vs. women 5.9 ± 2.1
g/kg/d, P=0.43), as were protein intakes relative to body weight (2.0 ± 0.7 g/kg vs. 1.8 ±
0.6 g/kg, P=0.21).
As shown in Figure 1 and Table 3, only 45.7% [95% confidence interval (CI),
36.4-55.2%] of athletes reported consuming the recommended intakes for CHO (≥ 6
g/kg/d), with no difference between sexes (P=0.50). Non-elite athletes competing in IM
and WC IM 70.3 showed the highest proportions of meeting the recommended intakes
for CHO (Figure 2). Energy intake relative to body weight was a significant correlate of
consuming 6 g CHO/kg/d or more (OR=1.31 per kcal/kg/day, 95%CI 1.17-1.45, P<0.01).
Thus, compared with WINTER athletes and after adjustment for energy intake in
kcal/kg/d, IM and WC IM 70.3 athletes were not more likely to report consuming 6 g
CHO/kg/d or more (OR=0.87 [95%CI 0.10-7.59] and 0.08 [95%CI 0.01-1.07]
Page 12 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
13
respectively). Neither self-reported food intolerance (P=0.43) nor particular food habits
(P=0.25) were associated with meeting the CHO recommendations.
As shown in Figure 1 and Table 3, 87.1% (95%CI 79.6-92.6%) of all non-elite
athletes reported consuming at least 1.2 g protein/kg/d while 66.4% (95%CI 57.0-74.9%)
reported consuming more than 1.6 g protein/kg/d. There was no significant difference
between men and women in the proportions of athletes meeting these recommendations
for dietary protein. Similarly, there was no difference among multisport groups for the
proportion of athletes meeting the 1.2g/kg/d recommendation for protein intake (P=0.96,
Figure 2). Energy intake relative to body weight was also a strong correlate of meeting
the recommended intakes for proteins, both at the lower limit of 1.2 g/kg/d (OR 1.58 per
kcal/kg/d, 95% CI 1.23-2.01, P<0.01) and at the upper-limit of 1.6 g/kg/d (OR 1.26 per
kcal/kg/d, 95% CI 1.15-1.38, P<0.01). Athletes who competed in IM (OR 23.1, 95%CI
2.1-261.6) and in WC IM 70.3 (OR 12.8, 95%CI 1.5-110.4) were more likely to achieve
the upper-limit of the recommended intakes for protein than WINTER athletes, even
after adjustment for energy intake in kcal/kg/d. Having particular food habits was not
associated with the prevalence of meeting the recommendations for proteins at the
lower-limit (P=1.00) or upper-limit (P=0.86). However, athletes with self-reported food
intolerance were less likely to reach the upper-limit of the protein intake recommendation
than those without food intolerance (P=0.02). When adjusted for sex and age, weekly
training volume in hours was a significant correlate of energy intake in kcal/kg,
explaining 13.7% of its variance (P <0.01).
Finally, as shown in Table 3, when considering only participants among whom
self-reported energy intake exceeded EER LOW (N=70) and EER ACTIVE (N=61), the
proportions of non-elite multisport athletes with CHO intake above the 6g/kg/d
Page 13 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
14
recommendation ranged from 73% to 77%. This implies that approximately 25% of non-
elite athletes are not achieving an intake of 6g CHO/kg/d even when the possibility of
under-reporting of food intake is taken into consideration. On the other hand, all non-
elite endurance athletes reported consuming 1.2g protein/kg/d or more once potential
under-reporters were excluded in this sensitivity analysis (Table 3). Interestingly, the
proportion of total energy provided as CHO and proteins was not influenced by the
purported degree of under-reporting (Table 3). This is consistent with the observation
that energy intake is the key determinant of achieving the recommended CHO and
protein intakes in endurance athletes.
Page 14 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
15
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the dietary habits of non-elite
athletes participating in different multisport endurance events, including summer and
winter multisport events, during the training period leading to their competition. Only
46% of participants reported consuming carbohydrates in amounts equal to or above the
6g/kg/d recommendation for endurance athletes. On the other hand, the majority (88-
84%) of non-elite male and female athletes met the lower limit of the recommended
protein intake (1.2 g/kg). Those proportions were slightly lower (70% for men vs. 56% for
women) when considering the upper target of protein intake (1.6 g/kg). Athletes
competing in IM and WC IM 70.3 were more likely to meet the recommendations for
carbohydrates and the upper-limit of protein intakes than those competing in IM 70.3
and WINTER.
Suboptimal intake of CHO for endurance events is of great concern considering
the role of this key nutrient in performance (Hawley and Hopkins 1995), fuelling and
recovery (Achten et al. 2004; Simonsen et al. 1991). Athletes with sub-optimal
carbohydrate intakes may also be at increased risk of a perturbed immune function
(Burke et al. 2006), which may impaired both the quality of training and sport
performance in competition. A low proportion of non-elite athletes achieving adequate
CHO intake for endurance events has been observed previously (Burke et al. 2001).
However, unlike in previous studies (Burke et al. 2001; Burke et al. 2003) (Nogueira and
Da Costa 2004), there was no difference between men and women in self-reported
carbohydrates intakes (in g/kg/d) and in the proportion of athletes achieving the
recommended intakes.
Page 15 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
16
There was also no significant difference in self-reported intakes of protein relative
to body weight between male and female athletes, which is consistent with some
(Papadopoulou et al. 2012) but not all studies (Burke et al. 2003; McKenzie et al. 2000;
Nogueira and Da Costa 2004). Predictably, energy intake is the main factor predicting
protein intake in our sample, as previously observed (Tarnopolsky 2004). An inverse
association between food intolerance and the prevalence of meeting the upper-limit of
protein intake was also observed. Whether this association is due to intolerances to
specific protein-rich foods (such as intolerance to dairy or lactose) or to a reduced
variety of food consumed remains unclear. Two out of three of the multisport endurance
non-elite athletes in this study (66.4%) consumed more proteins than is currently
recommended for endurance athletes. The perceived advantage of a high protein intake
by athletes has been documented in the past (Fox et al. 2011) and is consistent with
field observations of endurance athletes by the authors. Such high intakes of dietary
protein intakes may partly compensate the low CHO intakes in a context of low energy
availability during a period of endurance training by preventing lean mass loss
(Haakonssen et al. 2013). However, there is an opportunity for further educational efforts
to emphasize the importance of CHO in place of protein and possibly of fat as well to
optimize performance in multisport events, even in non-elite athletes.
Unsurprisingly, energy intake was a key factor predicting a high CHO intake, as
shown previously (Burke et al. 2001). The main correlate of energy intake was training
volume in hours per week. The training regimen of non-elite athletes from the WINTER
group was about half that of other non-elite athletes, which partially explains the low
prevalence of achieving CHO recommendations in this group. Consistent with this
observation, a positive relationship between training load and energy expenditure has
Page 16 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
17
been observed previously (Rodriguez et al. 2009). On the other hand, residual fatigue
from training has been shown to decrease appetite (Bentley et al. 2008; Tarnopolsky et
al. 2005). A busy training schedule may also limit the opportunities to eat (Nogueira and
Da Costa 2004). Nevertheless, training towards a full IM and for the WC IM 70.3 implies
more dedication and seriousness, which is directly reflected by better-adapted dietary
intake.
Over- and under-reporting of food intake is possible when relying on self-reported
data. Underestimation of food intake in athletes has been shown to range from 10 to
20% (Burke et al. 2001). Specific foods such as snacks and alcoholic beverages, which
are non trivial sources of CHO in athletes, are more likely to be under-reported (Mertz et
al. 1991). Under-reporting has also been associated with a busy lifestyle (Burke et al.
2001), which is likely a characteristic of most participants in this study considering that
71% have reported being employed full-time. On the other hand, over-reporting of food
intake based on self-report dietary assessment tools has also been observed in the
general population (Lutomski et al. 2011), particularly among younger individuals and
those with a low BMI (Johansson et al. 1998; Lutomski et al. 2011; Mattisson et al.
2005). In our study, participants who reported energy intakes exceeding the group mean
by two SD (N=3) were excluded from the statistical analysis as a way to exclude over-
reporting subjects. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to account for the potential
impact of under-reporting of food intake on the estimated prevalence of athletes
achieving the recommendations for CHO and protein. To do so, athletes were excluded
if their reported energy intake was below an estimated energy requirements for “low
active” and “active” people (Health Canada 2010). Even using this rather conservative
approach, almost one out of every 4 non-elite athletes did not achieve the recommended
Page 17 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
18
intake of 6g CHO/kg/d. On the other hand, using the same conservative approach, all
athletes achieved the lower recommendation for protein intake. The small number of
individuals in this sensitivity analysis did not allow us to compare the various multisport
events using this approach.
This study design has several strengths. The recruitment of a large number of
non-elite athletes from various geographical regions and countries through web-based
questionnaires yields greater generalizability of the results. Furthermore, the proportion
of women in our study sample is representative of the proportion of women in multisport
endurance events. In addition to recruiting athletes competing in many sport events, this
study included winter multisport events athletes, which, to our knowledge, had not been
done before. Some limitations of the study also need to be mentioned. The web-FFQ
used in this study has been validated in French (Labonte et al. 2012) but not in English
and not in populations other than French Canadians. However, recent studies by our
group have shown that intake of dairy as determined by the web-FFQ correlated with
blood biomarkers of intake in an ethnic diverse population (Abdullah et al. 2015).
Moreover, statistical analysis performed in the Canadian subjects yielded results that
were very similar to those seen in the entire group of participants (not shown). Most
subjects completed the FFQ after their sporting event, which implies that the race and
immediate post-race intakes are included in the reported food intakes. Finally, dietary
assessment through an FFQ does not provide information regarding the timing of food
intake, which is another key element of an athlete’s diet.
In conclusion, results of the present study suggest that between 23% and 54% of
non-elite multisport endurance men and women do not consume the recommended
amounts of carbohydrates to maximize fuelling for training and recovery processes
Page 18 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
19
during the training period leading to their sporting event. The findings of the present
study suggest the need for targeted education in this highly physically active population
in order to optimize carbohydrate intake, and this is particularly relevant in the context of
the current negative messages about carbohydrates. On the other hand, these findings
also raise the question whether the current carbohydrate recommendations for
endurance athletes are adequately adapted to the specific needs of the non-elite
athletes training for multisport events, particularly for those training in colder conditions
towards multisport winter events. In contrast, the recommended intakes for proteins are
achieved by a majority of athletes, and in greater proportions in longer and more
strenuous events such as IM and WC IM 70.3, even in this population of non-elite
athletes. Further investigations on dietary intakes including the timing of food
consumption are warranted in endurance multisport non-elite athletes. The extent to
which nutrition recommendations Individualized and group nutritional interventions may
benefit non-elite multisport endurance athletes who do not meet their nutritional needs.
Improving dietary strategies may maximize training adaptabilities on the long-term,
potentially enhancing performance even in this group of non-elite athletes.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Triathlon Quebec and the Pentathlon des Neiges
for their help with subjects’ recruitment. GM and BL designed the study; data were
collected by GM; data analysis, interpretation and manuscript preparation were done by
both authors. Authors have no disclosures.
Page 19 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
20
References
Abdullah, M. M., Cyr, A., Lepine, M. C., Labonte, M. E., Couture, P., Jones, P. J., & Lamarche, B.
2015. Recommended dairy product intake modulates circulating fatty acid profile in
healthy adults: a multi-centre cross-over study. Br J Nutr, 113(3), 435-444.
doi:10.1017/S0007114514003894
Achten, J., Halson, S. L., Moseley, L., Rayson, M. P., Casey, A., & Jeukendrup, A. E. 2004. Higher
dietary carbohydrate content during intensified running training results in better
maintenance of performance and mood state. J Appl Physiol (1985), 96(4), 1331-
1340. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00973.2003
Bentley, D. J., Cox, G. R., Green, D., & Laursen, P. B. 2008. Maximising performance in
triathlon: applied physiological and nutritional aspects of elite and non-elite
competitions. J Sci Med Sport, 11(4), 407-416. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2007.07.010
Brouns, F., Saris, W. H., Stroecken, J., Beckers, E., Thijssen, R., Rehrer, N. J., & ten Hoor, F.
1989a. Eating, drinking, and cycling. A controlled Tour de France simulation study,
Part I. Int J Sports Med, 10 Suppl 1, S32-40. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1024952
Brouns, F., Saris, W. H., Stroecken, J., Beckers, E., Thijssen, R., Rehrer, N. J., & ten Hoor, F.
1989b. Eating, drinking, and cycling. A controlled Tour de France simulation study,
Part II. Effect of diet manipulation. Int J Sports Med, 10 Suppl 1, S41-48.
doi:10.1055/s-2007-1024953
Burke, L. M., Collier, G. R., Beasley, S. K., Davis, P. G., Fricker, P. A., Heeley, P., . . . Hargreaves,
M. 1995. Effect of coingestion of fat and protein with carbohydrate feedings on
muscle glycogen storage. J Appl Physiol (1985), 78(6), 2187-2192. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7665416
Burke, L. M., Cox, G. R., Culmmings, N. K., & Desbrow, B. 2001. Guidelines for daily
carbohydrate intake: do athletes achieve them? Sports Med, 31(4), 267-299.
Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11310548
Burke, L. M., Loucks, A. B., & Broad, N. 2006. Energy and carbohydrate for training and
recovery. J Sports Sci, 24(7), 675-685. doi:10.1080/02640410500482602
Burke, L. M., Millet, G., Tarnopolsky, M. A., & International Association of Athletics, F. 2007.
Nutrition for distance events. J Sports Sci, 25 Suppl 1, S29-38.
doi:10.1080/02640410701607239
Burke, L. M., Slater, G., Broad, E. M., Haukka, J., Modulon, S., & Hopkins, W. G. 2003. Eating
patterns and meal frequency of elite Australian athletes. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab,
13(4), 521-538. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14967874
Costill, D. L., Sherman, W. M., Fink, W. J., Maresh, C., Witten, M., & Miller, J. M. 1981. The role
of dietary carbohydrates in muscle glycogen resynthesis after strenuous running. Am
J Clin Nutr, 34(9), 1831-1836. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7282610
Fox, E. A., McDaniel, J. L., Breitbach, A. P., & Weiss, E. P. 2011. Perceived protein needs and
measured protein intake in collegiate male athletes: an observational study. J Int Soc
Sports Nutr, 8, 9. doi:10.1186/1550-2783-8-9
Friedman, J. E., & Lemon, P. W. 1989. Effect of chronic endurance exercise on retention of
dietary protein. Int J Sports Med, 10(2), 118-123. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1024886
Page 20 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
21
Gianoli, D., Knechtle, B., Knechtle, P., Barandun, U., Rust, C. A., & Rosemann, T. 2012.
Comparison between recreational male Ironman triathletes and marathon runners.
Percept Mot Skills, 115(1), 283-299. doi:10.2466/06.25.29.PMS.115.4.283-299
Haakonssen, E. C., Martin, D. T., Burke, L. M., & Jenkins, D. G. 2013. Increased lean mass with
reduced fat mass in an elite female cyclist returning to competition: case study. Int J
Sports Physiol Perform, 8(6), 699-701. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23538431
Hawley, J. A., & Hopkins, W. G. 1995. Aerobic glycolytic and aerobic lipolytic power systems.
A new paradigm with implications for endurance and ultraendurance events. Sports
Med, 19(4), 240-250. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7604197
Health Canada. 2010. Dietary Referance Intakes. Retrieved from http://www.hc-
sc.gc.ca/fn-an/nutrition/reference/table/index-eng.php - eeer
Jeukendrup, A. E., Jentjens, R. L., & Moseley, L. 2005. Nutritional considerations in triathlon.
Sports Med, 35(2), 163-181. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15707379
Johansson, L., Solvoll, K., Bjorneboe, G. E., & Drevon, C. A. 1998. Under- and overreporting of
energy intake related to weight status and lifestyle in a nationwide sample. Am J Clin
Nutr, 68(2), 266-274. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9701182
Labonte, M. E., Cyr, A., Baril-Gravel, L., Royer, M. M., & Lamarche, B. 2012. Validity and
reproducibility of a web-based, self-administered food frequency questionnaire. Eur
J Clin Nutr, 66(2), 166-173. doi:10.1038/ejcn.2011.163
Lutomski, J. E., van den Broeck, J., Harrington, J., Shiely, F., & Perry, I. J. 2011.
Sociodemographic, lifestyle, mental health and dietary factors associated with
direction of misreporting of energy intake. Public Health Nutr, 14(3), 532-541.
doi:10.1017/S1368980010001801
Mattisson, I., Wirfalt, E., Aronsson, C. A., Wallstrom, P., Sonestedt, E., Gullberg, B., &
Berglund, G. 2005. Misreporting of energy: prevalence, characteristics of
misreporters and influence on observed risk estimates in the Malmo Diet and Cancer
cohort. Br J Nutr, 94(5), 832-842. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16277789
McKenzie, S., Phillips, S. M., Carter, S. L., Lowther, S., Gibala, M. J., & Tarnopolsky, M. A. 2000.
Endurance exercise training attenuates leucine oxidation and BCOAD activation
during exercise in humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, 278(4), E580-587.
Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10751189
Mertz, W., Tsui, J. C., Judd, J. T., Reiser, S., Hallfrisch, J., Morris, E. R., . . . Lashley, E. 1991.
What are people really eating? The relation between energy intake derived from
estimated diet records and intake determined to maintain body weight. Am J Clin
Nutr, 54(2), 291-295. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1858692
Nogueira, J. A., & Da Costa, T. H. 2004. Nutrient intake and eating habits of triathletes on a
Brazilian diet. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab, 14(6), 684-697. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15657473
Papadopoulou, S. K., Gouvianaki, A., Grammatikopoulou, M. G., Maraki, Z., Pagkalos, I. G.,
Malliaropoulos, N., . . . Maffulli, N. 2012. Body Composition and Dietary Intake of Elite
Page 21 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
22
Cross-country Skiers Members of the Greek National Team. Asian J Sports Med, 3(4),
257-266. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23342224
Rodriguez, N. R., DiMarco, N. M., Langley, S., American Dietetic, A., Dietitians of, C., American
College of Sports Medicine, N., & Athletic, P. 2009. Position of the American Dietetic
Association, Dietitians of Canada, and the American College of Sports Medicine:
Nutrition and athletic performance. J Am Diet Assoc, 109(3), 509-527. Retrieved
from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19278045
Rust, C. A., Knechtle, B., Knechtle, P., & Rosemann, T. 2013. A comparison of anthropometric
and training characteristics between recreational female marathoners and
recreational female Ironman triathletes. Chin J Physiol, 56(1), 1-10.
doi:10.4077/CJP.2013.BAA089
Simonsen, J. C., Sherman, W. M., Lamb, D. R., Dernbach, A. R., Doyle, J. A., & Strauss, R. 1991.
Dietary carbohydrate, muscle glycogen, and power output during rowing training. J
Appl Physiol (1985), 70(4), 1500-1505. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2055827
Tarnopolsky, M. 2004. Protein requirements for endurance athletes. Nutrition, 20(7-8), 662-
668. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2004.04.008
Tarnopolsky, M. A., Gibala, M., Jeukendrup, A. E., & Phillips, S. M. 2005. Nutritional needs of
elite endurance athletes. Part I: Carbohydrate and fluid requirements. Eur J Sport Sci,
5(1), 3-14.
Tarnopolsky, M. A., MacDougall, J. D., & Atkinson, S. A. 1988. Influence of protein intake and
training status on nitrogen balance and lean body mass. J Appl Physiol (1985), 64(1),
187-193. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3356636
Whyte, G. 2014. Age, sex and (the) race: gender and geriatrics in the ultra-endurance age.
Extrem Physiol Med, 3(1), 1. doi:10.1186/2046-7648-3-1
Page 22 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
23
Table 1 Characteristics of study participants a
WINTER: Athletes who competed in the Pentathlon des Neiges and/or in the ITU Winter Triathlon 2014; IM70.3: Ironman 70.3 in Mont-Tremblant 2014; WC IM70.3: Ironman 70.3 World Championship in Mont-Tremblant, 2014; IM: Ironman in Mont-Tremblant, 2014. *P values for differences between multisport events groups, as determined by ANOVA, except otherwise indicated. 1 different from WINTER, 2 different from IM70.3, 3 different from WC IM70.3 (all P<0.05) as determined by Duncan test; aValues are presented as means ± SD unless stated otherwise. bComparison between groups, as determined by Chi-Square test. cComparison between groups, as determined by Fisher’s exact test. dTraining time includes all cardiovascular-oriented training (cycling, running, swimming, speed skating, cross-country skiing, snowshoeing, fitness classes, strength training) and team sports (badminton, hockey, soccer) but excludes walking, yoga, rock climbing and alpine skiing time. eSelf-reported proportion of training time performed at ≥80% of maximum capacity
Multisport Event Total WINTER IM70.3 WC IM70.3 IM P-value*
N 116 12 22 43 39 Womenb, % 27.6 41.7 36.4 34.9 10.3 0.03 Canadianc, % 73.0 100 100 45.2 79.5 0.01 Full-time employmentb, % 70.7 50.0 77.3 62.8 82.1 0.08 Age, years 40.3 ± 11.0 39.8 ± 13.3 37.4 ± 7.3 40.9 ± 12.1 41.4 ± 10.9 0.56 BMI, kg/m 23.2 ± 2.2 22.9 ± 2.1 23.7 ± 2.2 22.4 ± 2.03 23.8 ± 2.3 0.02 Training timed, hr/week 14.8 ± 5.3 7.5 ± 3.8 13.0 ± 4.2 1 16.0 ± 5.01,2 16.7 ± 4.5 1,2 <0.01 Proportion of training at high intensitye, %
30.8 ± 22.5 55.8 ± 27.1 34.3 ± 21.51 24.6 ± 16.21 27.8 ± 22.51 <0.01
Rank, % of age/sex category
49.5 ± 28.4 43.9 ± 25.9 47.2 ± 24.7 51.9 ± 27.7 48.8 ± 31.9 0.85
Page 23 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
24
Table 2 Self-reported dietary Intakes according to multisport event in non-elite athletesa
WINTER: Athletes who competed in the Pentathlon des Neiges and/or in the ITU Winter Triathlon 2014; IM70.3: Ironman 70.3 in Mont-Tremblant 2014; WC IM70.3: Ironman 70.3 World Championship in Mont-Tremblant, 2014; IM: Ironman in Mont-Tremblant, 2014. a Values are presented as means ± SD bBW, Body weight;
Multisport Event
WINTER IM70.3 WC IM70.3 IM P-value*
Energy kcal/day 2739 ± 920 2925 ± 754 3193 ± 1224 3703 ± 11871,2 0.01 kcal/kg BW/dayb 40.9 ± 11.7 41.4 ± 11.7 48.0 ± 18.0 51.1 ± 16.1 0.07 %kcal from sports supplementsc 5.3 ± 0.4 8.4 ± 1.01 5.9 ± 1.1 9.0 ± 0.91 0.02
CHOd % energy 53.9 ± 5.4 53.6 ± 5.8 47.7 ± 9.11,2 57.7 ± 7.43 <0.01 g/day 365 ± 112 390 ± 106 381 ± 159 528.9 ± 1771,2,3 <0.01 g/kg BW/day 5.5 ± 1.5 5.5 ± 1.7 5.8 ± 2.5 7.3 ± 2.51,2,3 <0.01 % from sports supplements 8.0 ± 4.3 13.7 ± 7.8 11.3 ± 7.7 14.1 ± 8.2 0.06 Fibres, g/day 36.1 ± 14.3 40.6 ± 17.1 40.1 ± 14.7 50.0 ± 19.81 0.02
Proteins % energy 15.6 ± 1.7 16.0 ± 2.6 17.5 ± 2.71 16.4 ± 2.4 0.04 g/day 106.9 ± 37.3 118.9 ± 45.7 138.5 ± 53.51 151.4 ± 49.11,2 0.02 g/kg BW/day 1.6 ± 0.5 1.7 ± 0.6 2.1 ± 0.81 2.1 ± 0.61 0.02 From sports supplementsc, g/day 2.3 ± 0.1 4.3 ± 0.9 2.8 ± 1.4 4.4 ± 1.0 0.12 % from sports supplementsc 2.4 ± 0.2 4.0 ± 1.0 2.3 ± 1.2 3.0 ± 0.7 0.23
Fat % energy 32.1 ± 4.3 31.0 ± 5.8 36.3 ± 8.31,2 28.2 ± 5.83 <0.01 g/day 99.7 ± 44.3 101.0 ± 34.2 130.0 ± 60.5 118.1 ± 47.5 0.10 % from sports supplementsc 2.7 ± 0.3 3.4 ± 0.9 1.7 ± 0.9 3.1 ± 0.7 0.07
Alcohol % energyc 1.7 ± 0.2 1.9 ± 0.8 1.2 ± 0.5 0.8 ± 0.31,2 0.04 g/dayc 6.6 ± 0.8 7.4 ± 3.4 5.2 ± 2.0 4.2 ± 1.7 0.30
Page 24 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
25
cValues are square transformed. Geometrical means and SD are presented; dCHO, Carbohydrate; *P values for differences between sports events groups, as determined by ANOVA. 1 different from WINTER, 2 different from IM70.3, 3 different from WC IM70.3 (all P<0.05) as determined by Duncan test;
Page 25 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
26
Table 3 Self-reported dietary intakes in non-elite athletes according to their estimated energy requirementsa
WINTER: Athletes who competed in the Pentathlon des Neiges and/or in the ITU Winter Triathlon 2014; IM70.3: Ironman 70.3 in Mont-Tremblant 2014; WC IM70.3: Ironman 70.3 World Championship in Mont-Tremblant, 2014; IM: Ironman in Mont-Tremblant, 2014. a Values are means ± SD unless stated otherwise b Participants with self-reported energy intake exceeding their estimated energy requirements based on a physical activity (PA) coefficient defined as low active (EER LOW). c Participants with self-reported energy intake higher than their estimated energy requirements based on a physical activity coefficient defined as active (EER ACTIVE). dCHO, Carbohydrate; eBW, Body weight; fValues in brakets are 95% confidence Intervals gValues are square transformed. Geometrical means and SD are presented;
Total ≥ EER LOWb ≥ EER ACTIVEc
N 116 70 61 Energy
kcal/day 3267 ± 1147 3918 ± 994 4088 ± 947 kcal/kg /day 47.1 ± 16.1 56.9 ± 12.6 59.3 ± 11.7 %kcal from sports supplements 8.3 ± 6.0 6.7 ± 4.3 6.6 ± 4.2
CHOd % energy 52.8 ± 8.7 52.2 ± 8.7 52.3 ± 8.3 g/day 430.8 ± 166.7 513.1 ± 158.1 535.5 ± 153.4 g/kg BW/daye 6.2 ± 2.4 7.5 ± 2.1 7.8 ± 2.0 From sports supplements, g/day 52.0 ± 37.1 53.0 ± 35.4 54.3 ± 35.3 % with CHO intake ≥6g/kgf 45.7 [36.4-55.2] 72.9 [60.9-82.8] 77.1 [64.5-86.9]
Proteins % energy 16.7 ± 2.5 16.5 ± 2.4 16.5 ± 2.3 g/day 135.9 ± 50.8 161.5 ± 46.9 168.4 ± 45.6 g/kg BW/daye 2.0 ± 0.7 2.3 ± 0.6 2.4 ± 0.6 From sports supplementsg, g/day 3.5 ± 1.1 3.5 ± 1.0 3.5 ± 1.1 % with protein intake ≥1.2g/kgf 87.1 [79.6-92.6] 100.0 [94.9-100] 100.0 [94.1-100] % with protein intake ≥1.6g/kgf 66.4 [57.0-74.9] 91.4 [82.3-96.8] 95.1 [86.3-99.0]
Page 26 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
27
FIGURES
Figure 1. Proportion of male and female non-elite multisport endurance athletes
meeting the recommended intakes for protein (≥ 1.2 or ≥ 1.6 g/kg/d) and carbohydrates
(≥6 g/kg/d) for endurance sports.
Figure 2. Difference among the multisport groups in the proportion of endurance athletes
meeting the recommended intakes for proteins (≥ 1.2 or ≥ 1.6 g/kg/d) and carbohydrates
for endurance sports.
Page 27 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
207x159mm (300 x 300 DPI)
Page 28 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Draft
201x154mm (300 x 300 DPI)
Page 29 of 29
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/apnm-pubs
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism