Post on 13-Jan-2016
description
transcript
FORENSIC PERFORMANCE
Dr. Richard Bullock
Agenda Item No. 6a
SETTING THE SCENE
Performance Area Delivery Direction
Reducing Crime Good Stable
Investigating Crime Fair Stable
Performance area Delivery DirectionStatutory indicators
6b Percentage of offences brought to justice F S7a Percentage of sanction detections F S7b Burglary sanction detection rate F D7c Violent crime sanction detection rate F S7d Robbery sanction detection rate G S7e Vehicle crime sanction detection rate G SBaseline AssessmentMajor and serious crime investigation F Not gradedTackling cross border crime F Not gradedInvestigating hate crime / victimisation of the vulnerable G SVolume crime investigation F DForensic management F I
BURGLARY SCENE ATTENDANCESelect Area:
Select Role:
Crime Type:
Visit Type:
Oct-05 Nov-05 Dec-05Crimes 412 408 #N/AAttendance 272 332 #N/A% Attendence 66.0 81.4 #N/A
Last 3 Months Performance
Scene
ForceTotal
Burglary Dwelling
0
100
200
300
400
Apr-
03
Jun-0
3
Aug-0
3
Oct-
03
Dec-0
3
Feb-0
4
Apr-
04
Jun-0
4
Aug-0
4
Oct-
04
Dec-0
4
Feb-0
5
Apr-
05
Jun-0
5
Aug-0
5
Oct-
05
Dec-0
5
Feb-0
6
Number Visits
Trend in Visits
01000200030004000500060007000
Mar-
04
Apr-
04
May-0
4
Jun-0
4
Jul-04
Aug-0
4
Sep-0
4
Oct-
04
Nov-0
4
Dec-0
4
Jan-0
5
Feb-0
5
Mar-
05
Apr-
05
May-0
5
Jun-0
5
Jul-05
Aug-0
5
Sep-0
5
Oct-
05
Nov-0
5
Dec-0
5
Jan-0
6
Feb-0
6
Mar-
06 61
6263646566676869
12 Month Rolling Crime 12 Month Rolling Visits 12 Month Rolling % Attendance
Trend Crime (12 Month Rolling) Trend Attendance (12 Month Rolling)
THIS ATTENDANCE DATA IS COLLECTED VIA THE WORKLOAD SHEETS FILLED IN BY SOCO OFFICERS. THERE ARE A NUMBER OF CONCERNS OVER THIS DATA, INCLUDING THE FACT ONLY BCU LEVEL DATA IS AVAILABLE, ACROSS LIMITED CRIME TYPES. IT IS PROPOSED THAT CIS BE USED AS A MORE ACCURATE MEASURE, BUT THIS WILL TAKE A WHILE TO GET ACCURATE DUE TO NECESSARY CHANGES IN WORKING PRACTICES.
FAMILY SCENE ATTENDANCE - 12 Month to Sept 05
Process changes will in coming months improve position given current trends
A WORD OF CAUTION
Over 100% of scenes attended!! - national definition issues on what is a scene and repeat visits
Burglary Family Comparisons to Sept DNA
Improving
Good
Improving
Burglary Family Comparisons to Sept FP
Improving
Good
Improving
5.5
Force
Burglary Dwelling
Proportion Crimes Attended where DNA Taken
Select Area
Select Crime
Select Analysis
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
8.5
9
Mar
-04
Apr
-04
May
-04
Jun-
04
Jul-0
4
Aug
-04
Sep
-04
Oct
-04
Nov
-04
Dec
-04
Jan-
05
Feb-
05
Mar
-05
Apr
-05
May
-05
Jun-
05
Jul-0
5
Aug
-05
Sep
-05
Oct
-05
Nov
-05
Dec
-05
Jan-
06
Feb-
06
Mar
-06
EXHIBIT RECOVERY DNA
20.1
Force
Burglary Dwelling
Proportion Crimes Attended where FP Taken
Select Area
Select Crime
Select Analysis
20.1
21.1
22.1
23.1
24.1
25.1
26.1
27.1
28.1
Mar
-05
Apr
-05
May
-05
Jun-
05
Jul-0
5
Aug
-05
Sep
-05
Oct
-05
Nov
-05
Dec
-05
Jan-
06
Feb
-06
Mar
-06
EXHIBIT RECOVERY FP
39.6
File updated to Nov-05
Select FP / DNA / Both Both
Force
Domestic Burglary
Proportion of Idents after Elimination
Select Area
Select Crime
Select Analysis
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35A
pr-
04
Ma
y-0
4
Jun
-04
Jul-
04
Au
g-0
4
Se
p-0
4
Oct
-04
No
v-0
4
De
c-0
4
Jan
-05
Fe
b-0
5
Ma
r-0
5
Ap
r-0
5
Ma
y-0
5
Jun
-05
Jul-
05
Au
g-0
5
Se
p-0
5
Oct
-05
No
v-0
5
De
c-0
5
Jan
-06
Fe
b-0
6
Ma
r-0
6
FORENSIC IDENTS
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Jun-
04
Jul-
04
Aug
-04
Sep
-04
Oct
-04
Nov
-04
Dec
-04
Jan-
05
Feb
-05
Mar
-05
Apr
-05
May
-05
Jun-
05
Jul-
05
Aug
-05
Sep
-05
Oct
-05
Nov
-05
Dec
-05
Jan-
06
Feb
-06
Mar
-06
CONVERSION OF IDENTS - DOMESTIC BURGLARY
Select AreaSelect Crime TypeSelect Type of Ident
Action Taken Number PercentMove to Finalised - Detected 34 31.5Trying to Locate Suspect 12 11.1Suspect Eliminated 16 14.8Decision Made Not to Progress 11 10.2Other - Miscellaneous 14 13.0Suspect on Bail 7 6.5Undetected: More Evidence Required 6 5.6No Action 6 5.6Suspect in Prison 0 0.0Suspect in Custody 2 1.9Suspect in another Force Area 0 0.0Unable to Progress - Currently Abstrated 0 0.0Total 108
Figures are for the period Sep-05 to Dec-05
ForceDomestic Burglary
Both
31%
11%
15%
10%
13%
6%
6%
6% 0%2%
0%
0%
Move to Finalised - Detected
Trying to Locate Suspect
Suspect Eliminated
Decision Made Not to Progress
Other - Miscellaneous
Suspect on Bail
Undetected: More Evidence Required
No Action
Suspect in Prison
Suspect in Custody
Suspect in another Force Area
Unable to Progress - CurrentlyAbstrated
Select Area
Select Crime Type
Time Period Forecast Based On
Number or RateDetection TypeForecast Forward
ValueCurrent Total 15.6Forecasted Total 18.4
3 MonthsSanction
Force
Domestic Burglary
6 Months
Rate
18.4
12.4
9.9
10.9
11.9
12.9
13.9
14.9
15.9
16.9
17.9
18.9
De
c-0
4
Jan
-05
Fe
b-0
5
Ma
r-0
5
Ap
r-0
5
Ma
y-0
5
Jun
-05
Jul-
05
Au
g-0
5
Se
p-0
5
Oct
-05
No
v-0
5
De
c-0
5
Jan
-06
Fe
b-0
6
Ma
r-0
6
Ap
r-0
6
Ma
y-0
6
Jun
-06
Jul-
06
Au
g-0
6
Se
p-0
6
Oct
-06
No
v-0
6
De
c-0
6
DETECTION FORECASTS
12 month rolling total of selected crime Previous Year End totalYear End Forecast Target
Select Crime TypeSelect 12 Month End PeriodSelect Rate or Percent Point Change
BurglaryNov-05
Rate
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Notti
ngha
msh
ire
Gre
ater
Man
ches
ter
Wes
t Mid
land
s
Mer
seys
ide
North
ampt
onsh
ire
Linc
olns
hire
Hum
bers
ide
Clev
elan
d
Leice
ster
shire
War
wick
shire
Suss
ex
North
umbr
ia
Surre
y
Kent
Hertf
ords
hire
Derb
yshi
re
Bedf
ords
hire
Met
ropo
litan
Devo
n an
d Co
rnwa
ll
North
Yor
kshi
re
Avon
and
Som
erse
t
Tham
es V
alle
y
Durh
am
Suffo
lk
Staf
ford
shire
Glo
uces
ters
hire
Dors
et
Sout
h W
ales
Wes
t Yor
kshi
re
Wilts
hire
Esse
x
Sout
h Yo
rksh
ire
Cum
bria
Lanc
ashi
re
Norfo
lk
Cam
brid
gesh
ire
Ches
hire
Dyfe
d-Po
wys
Wes
t Mer
cia
North
Wal
es
Gwe
nt
City
of L
ondo
n
Ham
pshi
re
NATIONAL PERFORMANCE DETECTION RATES
Select Area:
Select Role:
Crime Type:
Visit Type:
Oct-05 Nov-05 Dec-05Crimes 249 312 #N/AAttendance 99 159 #N/A% Attendence 39.8 51.0 #N/A
Last 3 Months Performance
Scene
ForceTotal
Theft of Motor Vehicle
0
50
100
150
200
Apr-
03
Jun-0
3
Aug-0
3
Oct-
03
Dec-0
3
Feb-0
4
Apr-
04
Jun-0
4
Aug-0
4
Oct-
04
Dec-0
4
Feb-0
5
Apr-
05
Jun-0
5
Aug-0
5
Oct-
05
Dec-0
5
Feb-0
6
Number Visits
Trend in Visits
0500
1000150020002500300035004000
Mar-
04
Apr-
04
May-0
4
Jun-0
4
Jul-04
Aug-0
4
Sep-0
4
Oct-
04
Nov-0
4
Dec-0
4
Jan-0
5
Feb-0
5
Mar-
05
Apr-
05
May-0
5
Jun-0
5
Jul-05
Aug-0
5
Sep-0
5
Oct-
05
Nov-0
5
Dec-0
5
Jan-0
6
Feb-0
6
Mar-
06 0
10
20
30
40
50
12 Month Rolling Crime 12 Month Rolling Visits 12 Month Rolling % Attendance
Trend Crime (12 Month Rolling) Trend Attendance (12 Month Rolling)
THIS ATTENDANCE DATA IS COLLECTED VIA THE WORKLOAD SHEETS FILLED IN BY SOCO OFFICERS. THERE ARE A NUMBER OF CONCERNS OVER THIS DATA, INCLUDING THE FACT ONLY BCU LEVEL DATA IS AVAILABLE, ACROSS LIMITED CRIME TYPES. IT IS PROPOSED THAT CIS BE USED AS A MORE ACCURATE MEASURE, BUT THIS WILL TAKE A WHILE TO GET ACCURATE DUE TO NECESSARY CHANGES IN WORKING PRACTICES.
THEFT OF VEHICLE SCENE ATTENDANCE
FAMILY SCENE ATTENDANCE - 12 Month to Sept 05
Select Area:
Select Role:
Crime Type:
Visit Type:
Oct-05 Nov-05 Dec-05Crimes 833 853 #N/AAttendance 257 314 #N/A% Attendence 30.9 36.8 #N/A
Last 3 Months Performance
Scene
ForceTotal
Theft from Motor Vehicle
0100200300400500
Apr-
03
Jun-0
3
Aug-0
3
Oct-
03
Dec-0
3
Feb-0
4
Apr-
04
Jun-0
4
Aug-0
4
Oct-
04
Dec-0
4
Feb-0
5
Apr-
05
Jun-0
5
Aug-0
5
Oct-
05
Dec-0
5
Feb-0
6
Number Visits
Trend in Visits
02000400060008000
100001200014000
Mar-
04
Apr-
04
May-0
4
Jun-0
4
Jul-04
Aug-0
4
Sep-0
4
Oct-
04
Nov-0
4
Dec-0
4
Jan-0
5
Feb-0
5
Mar-
05
Apr-
05
May-0
5
Jun-0
5
Jul-05
Aug-0
5
Sep-0
5
Oct-
05
Nov-0
5
Dec-0
5
Jan-0
6
Feb-0
6
Mar-
06 27
28
29
30
31
32
12 Month Rolling Crime 12 Month Rolling Visits 12 Month Rolling % Attendance
Trend Crime (12 Month Rolling) Trend Attendance (12 Month Rolling)
THIS ATTENDANCE DATA IS COLLECTED VIA THE WORKLOAD SHEETS FILLED IN BY SOCO OFFICERS. THERE ARE A NUMBER OF CONCERNS OVER THIS DATA, INCLUDING THE FACT ONLY BCU LEVEL DATA IS AVAILABLE, ACROSS LIMITED CRIME TYPES. IT IS PROPOSED THAT CIS BE USED AS A MORE ACCURATE MEASURE, BUT THIS WILL TAKE A WHILE TO GET ACCURATE DUE TO NECESSARY CHANGES IN WORKING PRACTICES.
THEFT FROM VEHICLE SCENE ATTENDANCE
FAMILY SCENE ATTENDANCE - 12 Month to Sept 05
Select AreaSelect Crime TypeSelect Type of Ident
Action Taken Number PercentMove to Finalised - Detected 26 31.0Trying to Locate Suspect 11 13.1Suspect Eliminated 13 15.5Decision Made Not to Progress 10 11.9Other - Miscellaneous 10 11.9Suspect on Bail 6 7.1Undetected: More Evidence Required 3 3.6No Action 0 0.0Suspect in Prison 3 3.6Suspect in Custody 0 0.0Suspect in another Force Area 2 2.4Unable to Progress - Currently Abstrated 0 0.0Total 84
Figures are for the period Sep-05 to Dec-05
ForceTheft of Vehicle / TWOC
Both
31%
13%
15%
12%
12%
7%
4%0%4% 0%2% 0%
Move to Finalised - Detected
Trying to Locate Suspect
Suspect Eliminated
Decision Made Not to Progress
Other - Miscellaneous
Suspect on Bail
Undetected: More Evidence Required
No Action
Suspect in Prison
Suspect in Custody
Suspect in another Force Area
Unable to Progress - CurrentlyAbstrated
CONVERSION OF IDENTS - THEFT OF VEHICLE
Select AreaSelect Crime TypeSelect Type of Ident
Action Taken Number PercentMove to Finalised - Detected 28 41.2Trying to Locate Suspect 3 4.4Suspect Eliminated 14 20.6Decision Made Not to Progress 4 5.9Other - Miscellaneous 4 5.9Suspect on Bail 7 10.3Undetected: More Evidence Required 2 2.9No Action 2 2.9Suspect in Prison 1 1.5Suspect in Custody 2 2.9Suspect in another Force Area 1 1.5Unable to Progress - Currently Abstrated 0 0.0Total 68
Figures are for the period Sep-05 to Dec-05
ForceTheft from Vehicle
Both
42%
4%21%
6%
6%
10%
3%
3%
1%3%
1%
0%
Move to Finalised - Detected
Trying to Locate Suspect
Suspect Eliminated
Decision Made Not to Progress
Other - Miscellaneous
Suspect on Bail
Undetected: More Evidence Required
No Action
Suspect in Prison
Suspect in Custody
Suspect in another Force Area
Unable to Progress - CurrentlyAbstrated
CONVERSION OF IDENTS - THEFT FROM VEHICLE
Select Crime TypeSelect 12 Month End PeriodSelect Rate or Percent Point Change
Vehicle CrimeNov-05
Rate
0
5
10
15
20
25
Notti
ngha
msh
ire
Met
ropo
litan
Gre
ater
Man
ches
ter
Hum
bers
ide
Wes
t Mid
land
s
Suss
ex
Mer
seys
ide
Durh
am
Hertf
ords
hire
Linc
olns
hire
Clev
elan
d
Sout
h W
ales
Surre
y
North
ampt
onsh
ire Kent
Suffo
lk
Bedf
ords
hire
North
Yor
kshi
re
Wilts
hire
Devo
n an
d Co
rnwa
ll
Avon
and
Som
erse
t
Ham
pshi
re
Esse
x
Norfo
lk
Derb
yshi
re
Staf
ford
shire
City
of L
ondo
n
Tham
es V
alle
y
North
umbr
ia
Leice
ster
shire
War
wick
shire
Sout
h Yo
rksh
ire
Dors
et
Lanc
ashi
re
Glo
uces
ters
hire
North
Wal
es
Ches
hire
Cum
bria
Cam
brid
gesh
ire
Dyfe
d-Po
wys
Wes
t Yor
kshi
re
Wes
t Mer
cia
Gw
ent
NATIONAL PERFORMANCE DETECTION RATES
Select Area:
Select Role:
Crime Type:
Visit Type:
Oct-05 Nov-05 Dec-05Crimes 10633 10167 #N/AAttendance 1296 1467 #N/A% Attendence 12.2 14.4 #N/A
Last 3 Months Performance
Scene
ForceTotalTotal
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Apr-
03
Jun-0
3
Aug-0
3
Oct-
03
Dec-0
3
Feb-0
4
Apr-
04
Jun-0
4
Aug-0
4
Oct-
04
Dec-0
4
Feb-0
5
Apr-
05
Jun-0
5
Aug-0
5
Oct-
05
Dec-0
5
Feb-0
6
Number Visits
Trend in Visits
020000400006000080000
100000120000140000160000
Mar-
04
Apr-
04
May-0
4
Jun-0
4
Jul-04
Aug-0
4
Sep-0
4
Oct-
04
Nov-0
4
Dec-0
4
Jan-0
5
Feb-0
5
Mar-
05
Apr-
05
May-0
5
Jun-0
5
Jul-05
Aug-0
5
Sep-0
5
Oct-
05
Nov-0
5
Dec-0
5
Jan-0
6
Feb-0
6
Mar-
06 11.2
11.4
11.6
11.8
12
12.2
12.4
12 Month Rolling Crime 12 Month Rolling Visits 12 Month Rolling % Attendance
Trend Crime (12 Month Rolling) Trend Attendance (12 Month Rolling)
THIS ATTENDANCE DATA IS COLLECTED VIA THE WORKLOAD SHEETS FILLED IN BY SOCO OFFICERS. THERE ARE A NUMBER OF CONCERNS OVER THIS DATA, INCLUDING THE FACT ONLY BCU LEVEL DATA IS AVAILABLE, ACROSS LIMITED CRIME TYPES. IT IS PROPOSED THAT CIS BE USED AS A MORE ACCURATE MEASURE, BUT THIS WILL TAKE A WHILE TO GET ACCURATE DUE TO NECESSARY CHANGES IN WORKING PRACTICES.
TOTAL CRIME SCENE ATTENDANCE
FAMILY SCENE ATTENDANCE - 12 Month to Sept 05
Total Crime Family Comparisons to Sept DNA
Improving
Good
Good
Total Crime Family Comparisons to Sept FP
Improving
Good
Improving
Select AreaSelect Crime TypeSelect Type of Ident
Action Taken Number PercentMove to Finalised - Detected 226 36.8Trying to Locate Suspect 77 12.5Suspect Eliminated 67 10.9Decision Made Not to Progress 63 10.3Other - Miscellaneous 62 10.1Suspect on Bail 45 7.3Undetected: More Evidence Required 28 4.6No Action 25 4.1Suspect in Prison 7 1.1Suspect in Custody 7 1.1Suspect in another Force Area 7 1.1Unable to Progress - Currently Abstrated 0 0.0Total 614
Figures are for the period Sep-05 to Dec-05
ForceTotal Crime
Both
37%
13%11%
10%
10%
7%
5%
4%1%1%1% 0%
Move to Finalised - Detected
Trying to Locate Suspect
Suspect Eliminated
Decision Made Not to Progress
Other - Miscellaneous
Suspect on Bail
Undetected: More Evidence Required
No Action
Suspect in Prison
Suspect in Custody
Suspect in another Force Area
Unable to Progress - CurrentlyAbstrated
CONVERSION OF IDENTS - TOTAL CRIME
Select Crime TypeSelect 12 Month End PeriodSelect Rate or Percent Point Change
Total CrimeNov-05
Rate
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Met
ropo
litan
Notti
ngha
msh
ire
Hum
bers
ide
North
ampt
onsh
ire
Durh
am
Hertf
ords
hire
Clev
elan
d
Sout
h Yo
rksh
ire
Mer
seys
ide
Gre
ater
Man
ches
ter
Sout
h W
ales
Bedf
ords
hire
Avon
and
Som
erse
t Kent
Norfo
lk
War
wick
shire
Ches
hire
Surre
y
Devo
n an
d Co
rnwa
ll
Wes
t Mid
land
s
Suss
ex
Cam
brid
gesh
ire
Linc
olns
hire
Wes
t Yor
kshi
re
Ham
pshi
re
Gwe
nt
Staf
ford
shire
Suffo
lk
Derb
yshi
re
Esse
x
Glo
uces
ters
hire
North
Yor
kshi
re
Wilts
hire
Lanc
ashi
re
Dors
et
Leice
ster
shire
Cum
bria
North
Wal
es
Tham
es V
alle
y
North
umbr
ia
Wes
t Mer
cia
Dyfe
d-Po
wys
City
of L
ondo
n
NATIONAL PERFORMANCE DETECTION RATES
CONCLUSIONS
• Some Areas of Improvement
• Other Areas need further review and improvement
• Forensic Performance Group
• Lanner / Carrier Reports
• Performance Reviews
• Crime Scene Managers
• SOCRATES implementation
• Process Reviews
• Intelligence Led - in line with Targets, Priorities and Control Strategy