Gender disparities in park use and physical activity among ... · Gender disparities in park use...

Post on 07-Feb-2020

0 views 0 download

transcript

Gender disparities in park use and physical activity among children and teens

Kathryn P. Derose, Ph.D., M.P.H.

Childhood Obesity Conference May 31, 2015

Today’s discussion

Why care about gender disparities in park use and physical activity?

What do we already know about gender disparities?

Results from a large study of parks in Los Angeles

Implications of our findings

1

2

3

4

Why is this important?

Regular physical activity important for health across the lifespan

Parks second after schools as settings where youth engage in physical activity

Few studies examine park use and park-based physical activity among children and adolescents

Source: laparksfoundation.org

What do we already know?

Girls are less physically activity than boys

Park-based observations generally find – more males than females – males are more active than females GIRLS PLAY

LA

Access to safe parks is important for physical activity among adolescents in urban areas

Research Questions

Are there differences by gender in:

-park use

-levels of physical activity

-types of activities in parks

Methods

Used SOPARC to observe parks: -3 weekend days and 3 weekdays over 6 months

-over four 1-hour time periods

- counted number of users by age and activity level

Parks Study Our Study

48 parks in low-income communities in Los Angeles Examined gender disparities in park use and PA among

children and teens

• Parks mapped into target areas

• Users counted by apparent demographics and activity level – Male vs. female

– Child (0-12 years); teen (13-19 years)

– Sedentary vs moderate vs. vigorous

1 Gym

4 Patio

3 Class

11

6 Lawn & Sidewalk

10 Lawn

9

8

7

12

13 Play area 15

Soccer field

16 Lawn

2 5 Class

FZ1

FZ2

FZ3

FZ4

Take pictur

e

Path scan (7 minutes)

14

SOPARC Methods

Trained promotoras collected the data

Characteristic Mean Range Households in poverty (%) 27% 14 – 41% Population within 1 mile 52,310 25,530 – 133,123 Park size (acres) 8 2 – 26 Average number of youth park users 770 68 – 3,160

Male youth park users (%) 64% 46 – 86% Number of observed activity sessions 20 4 – 65

Characteristics of study parks (n=48)

8

Average number of youth park users and levels of physical activity

167 117 97

57

147

74 84

27

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Boys (0-12) Girls (0-12) Boys (13-19) Girls (13-19)Sedentary MVPA

Energy expenditure for youth park users by gender and age group

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Boys (0-12) Girls (0-12) Boys (13-19) Girls (13-19)

MET

s

Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET)

Top 9 primary activities by gender: Children (ages 0-12)

05

101520253035

% o

f Chi

ldre

n

Observed Activity

BoysGirls

Top 9 primary activities by gender: Teens (ages 13-19)

05

101520253035

% o

f Tee

ns

Observed Activity

BoysGirls

Percent active in top 10 target areas: Children (ages 0-12)

01020304050607080

% o

f Chi

ldre

n in

MVP

A

Target Areas

BoysGirls

Percent active in top 10 target areas: Teens (ages 13-19)

01020304050607080

% o

f Tee

ns in

MVP

A

Target Areas

BoysGirls

Percent active in organized and supervised activities by gender:

Children (ages 0-12)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Organized Unorganized Supervised Unsupervised

% o

f Chi

ldre

n in

MVP

A

Activity Type

BoysGirls

Percent active in organized and supervised activities by gender:

Teens (ages 13-19)

05

101520253035404550

Organized Unorganized Supervised Unsupervised

% o

f Tee

ns in

MVP

A

Type of Activity

BoysGirls

Conclusions

• More boys than girls use parks across all age groups

• Boys more physically active in parks than girls – disparities increase with age

• Across all areas, boys more active than girls

Implications

• Park use and physical activity disparities for girls require short and long-term responses strategies to draw

more girls to the park

programs that encourage girls to be more active in parks

evaluations of programs like Girls Play LA

Source: laparksfoundation.org

RAND colleagues Deborah Cohen, MD, MPH Bing Han, PhD Stephanie Williamson, BA Terry Marsh, MPH Laura Raaen, MPH AltaMed Promotoras 19

Acknowledgements

Contact for more information

derose@rand.org

Funding National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL114283 )