Post on 30-Dec-2015
description
transcript
1
George Mason School of Law
Contracts II
Duress
F.H. Buckley
fbuckley@gmu.edu
Physical Duress is an easy one
Lee Marvin, as highwaymanLiberty Valance, holding up Jimmy Stewart, The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance (John Ford, 1962)
Physical Duress is an easy one
Restatement § 174
The Highwaymen 1962
4
Ninth Circuit Judge Steve Trott
5
The Highwaymen 1996
6
The HighwaymenTheir Opening Act
7
Was that duress?
8
Was that duress?
Assume I have the right to do x (sue Johnny Cash) When is it wrongful to say “I will do x
unless you do y”
So what was the duress in Wolf v. Marlton?
10
What was the duress in Wolf v. Marlton?
11
A white crowd gathers on the front porch at 1863 E. 70th Street in South Los Angeles, where W.H. Whitson planned to sell his home to a black family. Sept. 7, 1949, LA Weekly
Was that duress?
What did the Δ’s do?
12
What did the Δ’s do?
13
4th Grade Class, Beeler Public School,Marlton NJ, 2007
Was that duress?
Just why was the threat wrongful?Restatement § 175 (an “improper threat”)
14
Was that duress?
Just why was the threat wrongful?Wrongful “in a moral sense”? An
“outrageous purpose”?
15
Was that duress?
Just why was the threat wrongful?Wrongful “in a moral sense”? An
“outrageous purpose”?When does a party breach “the duty of good
faith and fair dealing” in Restatement § 176(1)(d)?
16
Was that duress?
You’re a New Jersey judge in 1959. You’re handed Wolf, and you think segregation is an evil. What do you do?
17
Was that duress?
You’re a New Jersey judge in 1959. You’re handed Wolf, and you think segregation is an evil. What do you do?What is worse? Making the threat or
succumbing to it? Or is it the same?
18
Was that duress?
You’re a New Jersey judge in 1959. You’re handed Wolf, and you think segregation is an evil. What do you do?How do the incentives cut?
19
Was that duress?
What’s the remedy the Π’s seek? And why should that matter?
20
Was that duress?
What’s the remedy the Π’s seek? And why should that matter?Rescissionary relief an equitable remedy
The clean hands doctrine
21
Was that duress?
Just why was the threat wrongful?Wrongful “in a moral sense”? An
“outrageous purpose”?“malicious motives”?
Can you define malice?
22
Was that duress?
Just why was the threat wrongful?Wrongful “in a moral sense”? An
“outrageous purpose”?“malicious motives”?
Can you define malice?
23
Orson Welles and Michael MacLiammoir,Othello, 1952
Was that duress?
Just why was the threat wrongful?Wrongful “in a moral sense”? An
“outrageous purpose”?“malicious motives”?
Can you define malice?Restatement § 176(2)(a)
24
Was that duress?
Suppose that the threat was to sell the house to a member of the mob? Would that have made a difference?
25
Was that duress?
Just why was the threat wrongful?Wrongful “in a moral sense”? An
“outrageous purpose”?“malicious motives”?The intensity of the pressure on the Δs?
26
Was that duress?
Is this case like Hochman?“Further instructive is…”
27
Improper threats
The threat to reveal an embarrassing secret?
28
Improper threats
The threat to reveal an embarrassing secret? Cf. Restatement § 176(1)(a) (“or if the
threat itself…”)Why is blackmail a crime?
29
Improper threats
The threat to reveal an embarrassing secret? Cf. Restatement § 176(1)(a) (“or if the
threat itself…”)Why is blackmail a crime?Doesn’t it increase the cost of misbehavior?
30
Improper threats
The threat to reveal an embarrassing secret? Cf. Restatement § 176(1)(a) (“or if the
threat itself…”)Why is blackmail a crime?Doesn’t it increase the cost of misbehavior?
What else is going on?
31
32
George Mason School of Law
Contracts II
Duress
F.H. Buckley
fbuckley@gmu.edu
Improper threats
The threat to bring criminal proceedings. Restatement § 176(1)(b)
33
Improper threats
The threat to bring criminal proceedings
The bad faith threat to commence a civil action. Restatement § 176(1)(c)
34
Improper threats
The threat to bring criminal proceedings
The bad faith threat to commence a civil actionWhat if the Π has no knowledge of Δs
wrongdoing and asks for a settlement that is less than the cost of discovery?
35
Contract ModificationAustin v. Loral
Why did Loral agree to the contract modification?
36
Contract ModificationAustin v. Loral
Situational monopoliesThe possibility of post-contractual
opportunismWhat should the courts do?
37
Contract ModificationAustin v. Loral
Suppose you had been counsel for Austin. How might you have amended your pleadings?
38
Contract ModificationAustin v. Loral
Suppose you had been counsel for Austin? How might you have amended your pleadings?UCC §2-209(1)
39
Contract ModificationAustin v. Loral
Suppose you had been counsel for Austin? How might you have amended your pleadings?UCC §2-209(1)
UCC § 1-304. Every contract or duty within [the Uniform Commercial Code] imposes an obligation of good faith in its performance and enforcement
Restatement § 89
40
Why a different result in Chouinard?
Why a different result in Chouinard?
The Chicken Game in Rebel without a Cause
43
Swerve Straight
Swerve Tie, Tie -10, 10
Straight 10, -10 -100, -100
Player 2
Player 1
Modeling the Chicken Game
Examples of Chicken
Chouinard?
Examples of Chicken
Chouinard? The Constitution of 1789?
Examples of Chicken
Chouinard? The Constitution of 1789 The decision to provision Fort
Sumpter?
Rescue Contracts
47
SS Strathclyde, 1876
Rescue at Sea
How do Admiralty Courts handle rescue claims? Post v. Jones
Rescue at Sea
How do Admiralty Courts handle rescue claims? Post v. Jones What would an efficient rescue contract
look like?
Rescue at Sea
How do Admiralty Courts handle rescue claims? Post v. Jones What would an efficient rescue contract
look like? It would minimize all costs associated
with the possibility that the ship will be lost PLUS the rescue costs
Ex post Rescue Contracts Ex post, rescuer happens upon victim
and they bargain over a rescue.
51
Ex post Rescue Contracts Ex post, rescuer happens upon victim
and they bargain over a rescue.
The rescuer will attempt a rescue* provided that L > R, where: L = the cost of the loss if no rescue R = the cost of the actual rescue
52
*I assume that all attempted rescue are successful
Ex post Rescue Contracts Ex post, rescuer happens upon victim
and they bargain over a rescue.
The rescuer will attempt a rescue* provided that L > R, where: L = the cost of the loss if no rescue R = the cost of the actual rescue
The bargaining surplus to be divided between them is thus L – R.
53
*I assume that all attempted rescue are successful
Rescue Contracts
Suppose that the rule of duress prevented the rescuer from bargaining for any recovery
54
Rescue Contracts
Suppose that the rule of duress prevented the rescuer from bargaining for any recovery How much would the rescuer invest in R?
55
Rescue Contracts
One tends to assume that the rescuer scoops the entire bargaining surplus of L – R.
Do you think this is what happened in Post v. Jones?
56
Ex Ante Rescue Contracts
Suppose that rescuer and victim had to bargain ex ante for a rescue, before the victim embarked on his voyage
57
Ex Ante Rescue Contracts
Suppose that rescuer and victim had to bargain ex ante for a rescue, before the victim embarked on his voyage Both parties might want to invest in pre-
rescue care
58
Ex Ante Rescue Contracts
Now we have to include pre-rescue costs x and y, where: x = the pre-rescue costs born by the
victim in anticipation of the loss y = the pre-rescue costs born by the
rescuer in anticipation of the reward from the rescue
59
Ex ante Rescue Contracts
By investing in pre-rescue care x the victim can reduce the probability that he’ll need to be rescued And how would he do this?
60
Ex ante Rescue Contracts
By investing in pre-rescue care x the victim can reduce the probability that he’ll need to be rescued He might avoid dangerous places He might take extra precautions or extra
care
61
Ex anteRescue Contracts
By investing in pre-rescue care y the rescuer can increase the probability of a successful rescue. He might frequent dangerous places He might take extra precautions or extra
care
62
Rescue ContractsAn example of y
63
Efficient Rescue Contracts
An efficient duress rule would minimize the Social Costs of the rescue C And these are?
64
Efficient Rescue Contracts
An efficient duress rule would minimize the Social Costs of the rescue C What is the probability the vessel will go
down? What is the cost of the rescue? What are the pre-rescue costs for rescuer
and victim?
65
Efficient Rescue Contracts
An efficient duress rule would minimize the Social Costs of the rescue C:
C(x,y) = Loss if ship goes down + Rescue Costs + x + y
66
Efficient Rescue Contracts
An efficient duress rule would minimize the Social Costs of the rescue C:
C(x,y) = pV(1-pR)L + pVpRR + x + y, where pV is the probability that the victim will need
a rescue, and pR is the probability of a rescue
67
Efficient Rescue Contracts
An efficient duress rule would minimize the Social Costs of the rescue C:
Let x* and y* be the cost-minimizing (or efficient) levels of pre-rescue care by the victim and rescuer, respectively
68
Rescue Contracts Suppose that the rule of duress limited
the rescuer to a recovery of R upon a rescue. How much would the rescuer invest in y?
69
Efficient Rescue Contracts
What is the rescuer awarded under Admiralty Law?
Do you think that y* > 0?
70
Efficient Rescue ContractsOn Dry Land?
Livingston is an explorer who finds himself without food or water, alone in the desert. After a week he comes across an inn, owned by Conrad. “I’ll give you food and water,” says Conrad, “in exchange for all your money.” Livingston is a millionaire. “Think it over…,” says Conrad.
71
Efficient Rescue ContractsOn Dry Land?
Livingston is an explorer who finds himself without food or water, alone in the desert. After a week he comes across an inn, owned by Conrad. “I’ll give you food and water,” says Conrad, “in exchange for all your money.” Livingston is a millionaire. “Think it over…,” says Conrad.
Does y* > 0?
72
Efficient Rescue ContractsStatus Obligations
The optimal pre-rescue costs of the innkeeper might be 0. In that case, the rescuer is adequately compensated if he is given R for the rescue.
Enforcing a rescue contract which gives him L gives him an excessive incentive to take pre-rescue care; the victim will also take excessive care in this case.
73
74
George Mason School of Law
Contracts II
Fraud
F.H. Buckley
fbuckley@gmu.edu