Post on 29-May-2020
transcript
(Results-Framework Document)for
R F D
Department of Agriculture
(2013-2014)
Government of Karnatka
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Section 1:Vision, Mission, Objectives and Functions
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture-(2013-2014)
Ensure Food Security and make agriculture sustainable and economically viable vocation with emphasis on small farmersand backward areas.
Mission
To achieve the targeted growth rate of 4.5% in the agriculture sector by enhancing agriculture production and
productivity.To evolve and implement various state and central schemes for improving the income level and livelihood of
small, marginal and women farmersTo advice and implement specific schemes for drought prone areasTo offer quality
educational opportunities, promote research, generate appropriate technologies to address the relevant challenges
facing in agriculture and allied areas.To improve human resource including all stakeholders to promote sustainable
agriculture developmentTo effectively conserve, develop and utilize natural resources in a sustainable manner.To ensure
proper disaster and risk management in Agriculture including Climate resilient agriculture
Objectives
1 Ensuring food and nutritional security by increasing production and productivity.
2 Promoting Sustainable Agriculture through proper natural resource management.
3 Input Management.
4 Generation and transfer of technology.
5 Promoting investments in agriculture.
6 Risk Management
7 Concurrent evaluation of schemes by external agencies.
Functions
To undertake appropriate land use and protection conservation measures in order to minimize erosion through watershed approach and
simultaneously increase the productivity of the land and income of the farmers.
1
Improve agriculture extension services by adopting new institutional arrangements through the involvement of farmers, NGOs,
organizations and agriculture universities.
2
Endeavoring for adequate and timely supply of inputs such as seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, agricultural credit and implements to farmers.3
Enforcement of various Acts to ensure supply of quality inputs.4
Administering the National Agricultural Insurance Scheme (NAIS), Modified National Agricultural Insurance Scheme (MNAIS) and
Weather Based Crop Insurance Scheme (WBCIS) to provide relief to farmers in event of crop failure.
5
Vision
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 2 of 42
Section 1:Vision, Mission, Objectives and Functions
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture-(2013-2014)
Assisting the central government in laying down Minimum Support Prices (MSPs) for selected key agricultural commodities to ensure
remunerative prices to farmers.
6
Promotion of production and distribution of quality seeds through various state and central sector schemes like RKVY, NFSM, etc,7
Promotion of Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) and monitoring the distribution of inorganic fertilizers.8
Promoting plant protection measures and practices through the dissemination of appropriate technologies such as Integrated Pest
Management (IPM).
9
Promoting Farm mechanization to mitigate shortage of farm labour and reduce drudgery.10
Promoting Micro irrigation to conserve water and increase area under protective irrigation.11
Developing suitable strategies for rainfed farming through people’s participation and promotion of Integrated Farming System (IFS)
approach for augmenting the income and nutritional level of farming communities.
12
To build a strong academic foundation for the scientific and technical man power and conducting suitable technological trainings to the
farming society.
13
To identify thrust areas in agriculture, which have relevance for future and initiate work so that emerging problems can be spotted and
research directed towards their solution.
14
To monitor prices realized by the farmer and prices paid by the consumers in respect of all agricultural commodities by the data collected
from Department of Economics and Statistics.
15
Adoption of frontier technologies.16
Note- Production and Productivity targets can be re-fixed if so warranted by drought/ climatic condition. However, these would be in line
with the long term growth of these parameters.
17
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 3 of 42
Section 2:Inter se Priorities among Key Objectives, Success indicators and Targets
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Objective Weight Action Unit
Target / Criteria Value
Weight
80%100% 70% 60%90%
Very Good Fair PoorExcellent GoodSuccessIndicator
Ensuring food and nutritional security byincreasing production and productivity.
29.00 Production and Productivityof major Agricultural Crops(Incremental TargetValues)
Increase inProduction ofCereals (Normal103.17 lakh tons)
Lakhtons
11.8 3.9 0.05.921.02.00[1] [1.1] [1.1.1]
Increase inproductivity ofCereals – (normal2080 kg/ha)
Kg/ha 43.0 14.3 0.021.547.02.00[1.1.2]
Increase inProduction of Pulses(Normal 11.43 lakhtons)
Lakhtons
3.6 1.2 0.01.84.22.00[1.1.3]
Increase inproductivity ofPulses – (normal521 kg/ha)
Kg/ha 7.0 2.3 0.03.58.52.00[1.1.4]
Increase inProduction ofOilseeds (Normal11.12 lakh tons)
Lakhtons
4.6 1.5 0.02.34.92.00[1.1.5]
Increase inproductivity ofOilseeds - (normal631 kg/ha )
Kg/ha 164.0 54.7 0.082.0192.02.00[1.1.6]
Increase inProduction of Cotton(Normal 7.98 lakhbales)
Lakhbales
4.7 1.6 0.02.44.92.00[1.1.7]
Increase inProductivity ofCotton (Normal 328bales/ha)
Bales/ha 45.0 15.0 0.022.570.02.00[1.1.8]
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 4 of 42
Section 2:Inter se Priorities among Key Objectives, Success indicators and Targets
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Objective Weight Action Unit
Target / Criteria Value
Weight
80%100% 70% 60%90%
Very Good Fair PoorExcellent GoodSuccessIndicator
Increase inProduction ofSugarcane (Normal369.16 lakh tons)
Lakhtons
30.8 10.3 0.015.432.02.00[1.1.9]
Increase inProductivity ofSugarcane (Normal94 tons/ha)
Tons/ha 6.0 2.0 0.03.07.02.00[1.1.10]
Improved Crop Varieties No. of improvedcrop varietiesreleased
No 16.0 13.0 12.014.017.04.00[1.2] [1.2.1]
Hybrid Seeds/Disease freeplanting material (QualitySeeds) (Incremental TargetValues)
Increase in SeedReplacement Ratioof Paddy (Normal35)
% 2.0 0.7 0.01.32.21.00[1.3] [1.3.1]
Increase in SeedReplacement Ratioof Ragi (Normal27.6)
% 5.4 1.8 0.03.65.71.00[1.3.2]
Increase in SeedReplacement Ratioof Jowar (Normal27.8)
% 5.2 1.7 0.03.55.51.00[1.3.3]
Increase in SeedReplacement Ratioof Tur (Normal13.24)
% 19.8 6.6 0.013.220.01.00[1.3.4]
Increase in SeedReplacement Ratioof Groundnut(Normal 15)
% 18.0 6.0 0.012.018.51.00[1.3.5]
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 5 of 42
Section 2:Inter se Priorities among Key Objectives, Success indicators and Targets
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Objective Weight Action Unit
Target / Criteria Value
Weight
80%100% 70% 60%90%
Very Good Fair PoorExcellent GoodSuccessIndicator
Promoting Sustainable Agriculture throughproper natural resource management.
14.00 Treatment of land for Soiland Water Conservationunder different sectors
Area developedunder watershed
Hectare 310522 251523 2263712794703415746.00[2] [2.1] [2.1.1]
Integrated NutrientManagement
Area converted toorganic farming
Hectare 57200 46332 4169951480629201.00[2.2] [2.2.1]
Bio fertilizersdistributed
Hectare 380000 307800 277203420004180001.00[2.2.2]
Micronutrientsdistributed
Hectare 590908 478637 4307745318186499981.00[2.2.3]
Soil samplesanalyzed
Number 200000 162000 1458001800002200001.00[2.2.4]
% reduction innutrient deficiency insoil
% 24 26 2725231.00[2.2.5]
Water Management Area underprotective irrigation(Agricultural crops)
Hectare 174693 141502 1273521572241921621.00[2.3] [2.3.1]
Farm Mechanisation Farmers benefitedfrom farmmachineries
Number 91700 74277 66850825301008702.00[2.4] [2.4.1]
Input Management. 12.00 Inputs Supply (IncrementalTarget Values)
Area covered underquality seeds(Normal 5255000Ha)
Hectare 215000 71666 0.01433332650004.00[3] [3.1] [3.1.1]
Increase in quantityof NitrogenousFertilizers distributed(Normal 990191.2
Ton 67234.8 22411.6 0.044823.2225739.81.00[3.1.2]
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 6 of 42
Section 2:Inter se Priorities among Key Objectives, Success indicators and Targets
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Objective Weight Action Unit
Target / Criteria Value
Weight
80%100% 70% 60%90%
Very Good Fair PoorExcellent GoodSuccessIndicator
Tons)
Increase in quantityof PhosphorusFertilizers distributed(Normal 611542.2Tons)
Ton 95549.8 31850.0 0.063699.8175220.81.00[3.1.3]
Increase in quantityof PotassicFertilizers distributed(Normal 371079.6Tons)
Ton 105592.4 35197.0 0.070395.01150001.00[3.1.4]
% Reduction in croploss due to pestsand diseases
% 25 27 2826242.00[3.1.5]
Quality Control No. of seed samplesanalyzed
Number 10400 8424 75829360114401.00[3.2] [3.2.1]
No. of fertilizersamples analyzed
Number 15000 12150 1093513500165001.00[3.2.2]
No. of pesticidesamples analyzed
Number 6800 5508 4957612074801.00[3.2.3]
Generation and transfer of technology. 12.00 Intensive ExtensionActivities (Exposure Visits,Demonstrations, etc.,)
CropDemonstrations laidout
Hectare 7427115 6015964 5414368668440481698263.00[4] [4.1] [4.1.1]
Number of farmersparticipated in
Number 150898 122229 1100071358091659871.00[4.1.2]
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 7 of 42
Section 2:Inter se Priorities among Key Objectives, Success indicators and Targets
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Objective Weight Action Unit
Target / Criteria Value
Weight
80%100% 70% 60%90%
Very Good Fair PoorExcellent GoodSuccessIndicator
Farm Schools, FarmField Schools andExposure visits
Trainings Farmers who havebeen trained onAgriculturaltechnologies
Number 435495 402684 3886964182264527642.00[4.2] [4.2.1]
Human ResourceDevelopment
Outturn of Graduate,Master Graduates,Doctoral Degree &Diploma holders indifferent branches ofagriculture and alliedsciences.
Number 2605 2111 1900234528652.00[4.3] [4.3.1]
New technologiesdeveloped
Crop ProductionTechnologies
Number 33 28 2630362.00[4.4] [4.4.1]
Crop ProtectionTechnologies
Number 29 24 2226321.00[4.4.2]
Other technologiesdeveloped
Number 9 7 68101.00[4.4.3]
Promoting investments in agriculture. 10.00 Post Harvest & Agroprocessing
No. of Tarpaulinsdistributed
Number 220000 178200 1603801980002420001.00[5] [5.1] [5.1.1]
Threshing yardsestablished
Number 400 324 2923604401.00[5.1.2]
Development of marketingagril. produce at grass rootlevel
Commodity Interest/Raitha Shakthi/ SelfHelp Groups formed
Number 12365 10997 1041411645130852.00[5.2] [5.2.1]
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 8 of 42
Section 2:Inter se Priorities among Key Objectives, Success indicators and Targets
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Objective Weight Action Unit
Target / Criteria Value
Weight
80%100% 70% 60%90%
Very Good Fair PoorExcellent GoodSuccessIndicator
Efficient Functioning of the RFD System 4.00 Timely submission of Draft RFD2012-13 for Approval
On-time submission Date 02/08/2013 08/08/2013 10/08/201305/08/201331/07/20132.0*
Timely submission of end of theyear RFD 2011-12 Results
On-time submission Date 02/08/2013 08/08/2013 10/08/201305/08/201331/07/20132.0
Efficient use of IT in the Department 1.00 Timely updation of websitecontents
Percentage of Notifications,GOs,
% 85 75 7080901.0*
* Mandatory Objective(s)
Investments in Agriculture(Incremental TargetValues)
Public sectorinvestment inagriculture (2012-13- Rs.2354.04Crores)
Rs.Crore 52.96 17.65 0.035.31553.00[5.3] [5.3.1]
% of AgricultureBudget to the totalState Budget
% 4.94 4.00 3.604.455.433.00[5.3.2]
Risk Management 5.00 Crop Insurance(Incremental TargetValues)
Farmers coveredunder NAIS, MNAIS& WBCIS (Normal1200000)
Number 520000 173333 0.03466675709602.00[6] [6.1] [6.1.1]
Credit (Incremental TargetValues)
Disbursement ofcredit to the primarysector ( 2012-13Rs.35173 Crore)
Rs.Crore 9372 3124 0.06248103092.00[6.2] [6.2.1]
Contingent Cropping Plan Preparation ofContingent CroppingPlan
Date 16/07/2013 05/08/2013 13/08/201324/07/201308/07/20131.00[6.3] [6.3.1]
Concurrent evaluation of schemes byexternal agencies.
3.00 Schemes evaluated % of developmentalschemes evaluatedby external agencies
% 20 15 1217223.00[7] [7.1] [7.1.1]
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 9 of 42
Section 2:Inter se Priorities among Key Objectives, Success indicators and Targets
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Objective Weight Action Unit
Target / Criteria Value
Weight
80%100% 70% 60%90%
Very Good Fair PoorExcellent GoodSuccessIndicator
Circulars uploaded on thewebsite within one week ofissue
Administrative Reforms 3.00 Simplification of procedures Number of redundantprocedures identified(Based on credible actionplan prepared by thedepartment and endorsedby the ATF Committee)
Number -- -- -- -- --1.0*
Number of redundantprocedures simplified(Based on credible actionplan prepared by thedepartment and endorsedby the ATF Committee)
Number -- -- -- -- --1.0
Number of redundantprocedures notified (Basedon credible action planprepared by the departmentand endorsed by the ATFCommittee)
Number -- -- -- -- --1.0
Evaluation 2.00 Developing and Approving ToR,Tools & assigning it to agencies
Percentage of expenditureagainst 1% programmeoutlay for evaluation
% 85 75 7080902.0*
Submission of Reports and Citizen’s Charter 3.00 Timely submission of AnnualReport
On-time submission (Beforecommencement of budgetsession of legislature)
Date 02/07/2013 08/07/2013 10/07/201305/07/201330/06/20131.0*
* Mandatory Objective(s)
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 10 of 42
Section 2:Inter se Priorities among Key Objectives, Success indicators and Targets
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Objective Weight Action Unit
Target / Criteria Value
Weight
80%100% 70% 60%90%
Very Good Fair PoorExcellent GoodSuccessIndicator
Timely submission of MPIC On-time submission(Percentage of preparationand submission of MPICbefore 20th of every month)
% 85 75 7080901.0
Development of Citizen’s Charter Uploading the Citizens/Clients Charter on Website
Date 07/01/2014 21/01/2014 28/01/201414/01/201431/12/20131.0
Ensuring Compliance to the FinancialAccountability Framework
2.00 Timely Submission of ATNs onAudit paras of C&AG
Percentage of ATNssubmitted within due date (4months)
% 85 75 7080901.0*
Timely Submission of ATRs onPAC Reports
Percentage of ATRssubmitted within due date (6months)
% 85 75 7080901.0
* Mandatory Objective(s)
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 11 of 42
Section 3:Trend Values of the Success Indicators
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Target Valuefor
ProjectedValue for
Objective ProjectedValue for
Action Success Indicator
FY 11/12
Unit
FY 13/14FY 12/13 FY 14/15
Actual Valuefor
Actual Valuefor
FY 15/16
9.11 11.8Lakh tonsIncrease in Productionof Cereals (Normal103.17 lakh tons)
Ensuring food and nutritional securityby increasing production andproductivity.
Production andProductivity of majorAgricultural Crops(Incremental TargetValues)
23.53 25.438.5[1] [1.1] [1.1.1]
246 43.0Kg/haIncrease in productivityof Cereals – (normal2080 kg/ha)
228 250195.0[1.1.2]
0.3 3.6Lakh tonsIncrease in Productionof Pulses (Normal11.43 lakh tons)
4.97 5.271.9[1.1.3]
1.0 7.0Kg/haIncrease in productivityof Pulses – (normal521 kg/ha)
81 90.070.0[1.1.4]
-1.33 4.6Lakh tonsIncrease in Productionof Oilseeds (Normal11.12 lakh tons)
4.93 5.71-1.6[1.1.5]
94.0 164.0Kg/haIncrease in productivityof Oilseeds - (normal631 kg/ha )
114.0 139.060.0[1.1.6]
4.01 4.7Lakhbales
Increase in Productionof Cotton (Normal 7.98lakh bales)
4.48 5.432.90[1.1.7]
12.0 45.0Bales/haIncrease in Productivityof Cotton (Normal 328
47.0 72.012.0[1.1.8]
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 12 of 42
Section 3:Trend Values of the Success Indicators
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Target Valuefor
ProjectedValue for
Objective ProjectedValue for
Action Success Indicator
FY 11/12
Unit
FY 13/14FY 12/13 FY 14/15
Actual Valuefor
Actual Valuefor
FY 15/16
bales/ha)
18.92 30.8Lakh tonsIncrease in Productionof Sugarcane (Normal369.16 lakh tons)
155.84 180.84-66.0[1.1.9]
1.0 6.0Tons/haIncrease in Productivityof Sugarcane (Normal94 tons/ha)
11.0 16.0-15.0[1.1.10]
14 16.0NoNo. of improved cropvarieties released
Improved Crop Varieties 21 2326.0[1.2] [1.2.1]
6 2.0%Increase in SeedReplacement Ratio ofPaddy (Normal 35)
Hybrid Seeds/Diseasefree planting material(Quality Seeds)(Incremental TargetValues)
3 46.0[1.3] [1.3.1]
4.4 5.4%Increase in SeedReplacement Ratio ofRagi (Normal 27.6)
5.4 5.45.4[1.3.2]
2.2 5.2%Increase in SeedReplacement Ratio ofJowar (Normal 27.8)
5.2 5.22.2[1.3.3]
-0.2 19.8%Increase in SeedReplacement Ratio ofTur (Normal 13.24)
19.8 19.86.8[1.3.4]
14 18.0%Increase in SeedReplacement Ratio
18.0 18.012.0[1.3.5]
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 13 of 42
Section 3:Trend Values of the Success Indicators
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Target Valuefor
ProjectedValue for
Objective ProjectedValue for
Action Success Indicator
FY 11/12
Unit
FY 13/14FY 12/13 FY 14/15
Actual Valuefor
Actual Valuefor
FY 15/16
of Groundnut (Normal15)
241985 310522HectareArea developed underwatershed
Promoting Sustainable Agriculturethrough proper natural resourcemanagement.
Treatment of land for Soiland Water Conservationunder different sectors
337610 354490401015.0[2] [2.1] [2.1.1]
41230 57200HectareArea converted toorganic farming
Integrated NutrientManagement
57200 5720050836.0[2.2] [2.2.1]
239645 380000HectareBio fertilizersdistributed
418613 439543347009[2.2.2]
340821 590908HectareMicronutrientsdistributed
620453 651476419789.0[2.2.3]
143200 200000NumberSoil samples analyzed 205000 205000200100.0[2.2.4]
27 24%% reduction in nutrientdeficiency in soil
20 1924.6[2.2.5]
453697 174693HectareArea under protectiveirrigation (Agriculturalcrops)
Water Management 192160 211376388916.0[2.3] [2.3.1]
160384 91700NumberFarmers benefitedfrom farm machineries
Farm Mechanisation 98100 105326135302[2.4] [2.4.1]
-319000 215000HectareArea covered underquality seeds (Normal5255000 Ha)
Input Management. Inputs Supply(Incremental TargetValues)
329000 3640000[3] [3.1] [3.1.1]
225739.8 67234.8TonIncrease in quantity ofNitrogenous Fertilizersdistributed (Normal
163645.8 192143.8-98387.2[3.1.2]
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 14 of 42
Section 3:Trend Values of the Success Indicators
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Target Valuefor
ProjectedValue for
Objective ProjectedValue for
Action Success Indicator
FY 11/12
Unit
FY 13/14FY 12/13 FY 14/15
Actual Valuefor
Actual Valuefor
FY 15/16
990191.2 Tons)
175220.8 95549.8TonIncrease in quantity ofPhosphorus Fertilizersdistributed (Normal611542.2 Tons)
200767.8 225496.8-225452[3.1.3]
-38227.6 105592.4TonIncrease in quantity ofPotassic Fertilizersdistributed (Normal371079.6 Tons)
169016.4 187899.0-121212.0[3.1.4]
32 25%% Reduction in croploss due to pests anddiseases
24 2324.0[3.1.5]
7534 10400NumberNo. of seed samplesanalyzed
Quality Control 10500 1100010408.0[3.2] [3.2.1]
6441 15000NumberNo. of fertilizersamples analyzed
15000 1500011081.0[3.2.2]
4171 6800NumberNo. of pesticidesamples analyzed
6800 68007485.0[3.2.3]
3061389 7427115HectareCrop Demonstrationslaid out
Generation and transfer oftechnology.
Intensive ExtensionActivities (ExposureVisits, Demonstrations,etc.,)
7798471 81883946534121.0[4] [4.1] [4.1.1]
57945 150898NumberNumber of farmersparticipated in FarmSchools, Farm FieldSchools and Exposurevisits
158443 166365110790.0[4.1.2]
409072 435495NumberFarmers who havebeen trained on
Trainings 457269 480133492351.0[4.2] [4.2.1]
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 15 of 42
Section 3:Trend Values of the Success Indicators
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Target Valuefor
ProjectedValue for
Objective ProjectedValue for
Action Success Indicator
FY 11/12
Unit
FY 13/14FY 12/13 FY 14/15
Actual Valuefor
Actual Valuefor
FY 15/16
Agriculturaltechnologies
2517 2605NumberOutturn of Graduate,Master Graduates,Doctoral Degree &Diploma holders indifferent branches ofagriculture and alliedsciences.
Human ResourceDevelopment
4221 45002950.0[4.3] [4.3.1]
16 33NumberCrop ProductionTechnologies
New technologiesdeveloped
35 3834.0[4.4] [4.4.1]
22 29NumberCrop ProtectionTechnologies
38 4024.0[4.4.2]
9 9NumberOther technologiesdeveloped
10 1015.0[4.4.3]
78177 220000NumberNo. of Tarpaulinsdistributed
Promoting investments in agriculture. Post Harvest & Agroprocessing
250000 275000236208.0[5] [5.1] [5.1.1]
987 400NumberThreshing yardsestablished
500 600272.0[5.1.2]
7972 12365NumberCommodity Interest/Raitha Shakthi/ SelfHelp Groups formed
Development ofmarketing agril. produceat grass root level
13000 1350010263.0[5.2] [5.2.1]
265.42 74.8Rs.CrorePublic sectorinvestment inagriculture (2012-13-Rs.2354.04 Crores)
Investments inAgriculture (IncrementalTarget Values)
317.68 584.850[5.3] [5.3.1]
5.49 5.23%% of AgricultureBudget to the total
5.5 5.85.6[5.3.2]
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 16 of 42
Section 3:Trend Values of the Success Indicators
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Target Valuefor
ProjectedValue for
Objective ProjectedValue for
Action Success Indicator
FY 11/12
Unit
FY 13/14FY 12/13 FY 14/15
Actual Valuefor
Actual Valuefor
FY 15/16
-- 30/07/2013DateOn-time submissionEfficient Functioning of the RFDSystem
Timely submission of DraftRFD 2012-13 for Approval
30/07/2014 30/07/201530/07/2012*
-- 02/08/2013DateOn-time submissionTimely submission of end ofthe year RFD 2011-12 Results
-- -- --
-- 85%Percentage of Notifications,GOs, Circulars uploaded onthe website within one weekof issue
Efficient use of IT in the Department Timely updation of websitecontents
-- --95*
-- --NumberNumber of redundantprocedures identified
Administrative Reforms Simplification of procedures -- --5*
* Mandatory Objective(s)
State Budget
500960 520000NumberFarmers coveredunder NAIS, MNAIS &WBCIS (Normal1200000)
Risk Management Crop Insurance(Incremental TargetValues)
550000 575000500201.0[6] [6.1] [6.1.1]
-6493 9372Rs.CroreDisbursement of creditto the primary sector (2012-13 Rs.35173Crore)
Credit (IncrementalTarget Values)
13826 187260[6.2] [6.2.1]
15/07/2011 15/07/2013DatePreparation ofContingent CroppingPlan
Contingent CroppingPlan
15/07/2014 15/07/201503/07/2012[6.3] [6.3.1]
25.0 20%% of developmentalschemes evaluated byexternal agencies
Concurrent evaluation of schemes byexternal agencies.
Schemes evaluated 20 2046.9[7] [7.1] [7.1.1]
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 17 of 42
Section 3:Trend Values of the Success Indicators
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Target Valuefor
ProjectedValue for
Objective ProjectedValue for
Action Success Indicator
FY 11/12
Unit
FY 13/14FY 12/13 FY 14/15
Actual Valuefor
Actual Valuefor
FY 15/16
(Based on credible action planprepared by the departmentand endorsed by the ATFCommittee)
-- --NumberNumber of redundantprocedures simplified (Basedon credible action planprepared by the departmentand endorsed by the ATFCommittee)
-- --4
-- --NumberNumber of redundantprocedures notified (Based oncredible action plan preparedby the department andendorsed by the ATFCommittee)
-- --4
-- 85%Percentage of expenditureagainst 1% programme outlayfor evaluation
Evaluation Developing and ApprovingToR, Tools & assigning it toagencies
-- --22.0*
-- 02/07/2013DateOn-time submission (Beforecommencement of budgetsession of legislature)
Submission of Reports and Citizen’sCharter
Timely submission of AnnualReport
-- --20/02/2012*
-- 85%On-time submission(Percentage of preparationand submission of MPICbefore 20th of every month)
Timely submission of MPIC -- --90.0
-- 07/01/2014DateUploading the Citizens/Clients Charter on Website
Development of Citizen’sCharter
-- --24/09/2012
* Mandatory Objective(s)
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 18 of 42
Section 3:Trend Values of the Success Indicators
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Target Valuefor
ProjectedValue for
Objective ProjectedValue for
Action Success Indicator
FY 11/12
Unit
FY 13/14FY 12/13 FY 14/15
Actual Valuefor
Actual Valuefor
FY 15/16
-- 85%Percentage of ATNssubmitted within due date (4months)
Ensuring Compliance to the FinancialAccountability Framework
Timely Submission of ATNs onAudit paras of C&AG
-- --90.0*
-- 85%Percentage of ATRssubmitted within due date (6months)
Timely Submission of ATRs onPAC Reports
-- --90.0
* Mandatory Objective(s)
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 19 of 42
Section 4:Acronym
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
AcronymSI.No Description
Modified National Agriculture Insurance Scheme1 MNAIS
National Agriculture Insurance Scheme2 NAIS
Research and Development3 R and D
State Agriculture Universities4 SAUs
Weather Based Crop Insurance Scheme5 WBCIS
Page : 20 of 42
Section 4:Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Success indicator Description Definition MeasurementSI.No General Comments
To ensure increasedproduction in Cereals
To ensure increased production inCereals
1 Increase in total production ofcereals to that of the average
production.
[1.1.1] Increase in Production of Cereals (Normal103.17 lakh tons)
To ensure increasedproductivity in Cereals
To ensure increased productivity inCereals
2 Increase in per hectare yield ofcereals to that of the average
productivity.
[1.1.2] Increase in productivity of Cereals – (normal2080 kg/ha)
To ensure increasedproduction in Pulses
To ensure increased production inPulses
3 Increase in total production ofPulses to that of the average
production
[1.1.3] Increase in Production of Pulses (Normal11.43 lakh tons)
To ensure increasedproductivity in Pulses
To ensure increased productivity inPulses
4 Increase in per hectare yield ofpulses to that of the average
productivity.
[1.1.4] Increase in productivity of Pulses – (normal521 kg/ha)
To ensure increasedproduction in Oilseed
To ensure increased production inOilseed
5 Increase in total production ofOilseeds to that of the average
production.
[1.1.5] Increase in Production of Oilseeds (Normal11.12 lakh tons)
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 21 of 42
Section 4:Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Success indicator Description Definition MeasurementSI.No General Comments
To ensure increasedproductivity in Oilseeds
To ensure increased productivity inOilseeds
6 Increase in per hectare yield ofoilseeds to that of the average
productivity.
[1.1.6] Increase in productivity of Oilseeds -(normal 631 kg/ha )
To ensure increasedproduction in Cotton
To ensure increased production inCotton
7 Increase in total production ofCotton to that of the average
production.
[1.1.7] Increase in Production of Cotton (Normal7.98 lakh bales)
To ensure increasedproductivity in Cotton
To ensure increased productivity inCotton
8 Increase in per hectare yield ofCotton to that of the average
productivity.
[1.1.8] Increase in Productivity of Cotton (Normal328 bales/ha)
To ensure increasedproduction in Sugarcane
To ensure increased production inSugarcane
9 Increase in total production ofSugarcane to that of the
average production.
[1.1.9] Increase in Production of Sugarcane(Normal 369.16 lakh tons)
To ensure increasedproductivity in Sugarcane
To ensure increased productivity inSugarcane
10 Increase in per hectare yield ofSugarcane to that of the
average productivity.
[1.1.10] Increase in Productivity of Sugarcane(Normal 94 tons/ha)
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 22 of 42
Section 4:Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Success indicator Description Definition MeasurementSI.No General Comments
Promotion of research inevolving high
yielding/disease and pestresistant/ drought & flood
resistant/ cropvarieties/hybrids
Promotion of research in evolvinghigh yielding/disease and pest
resistant/ drought & flood resistant/crop varieties/hybrids
11 Number of improved cropvarieties released.
[1.2.1] No. of improved crop varieties released
To encourage farmers to takeup sowing of improved cropvarieties of Paddy in a larger
area.
To encourage farmers to take upsowing of improved crop varieties of
Paddy in a larger area.
12 Dividing the area underimproved paddy
varieties/hybrids to the totalarea under paddy cultivation.
[1.3.1] Increase in Seed Replacement Ratio ofPaddy (Normal 35)
To encourage farmers to takeup sowing of improved cropvarieties of Ragi in a larger
area.
To encourage farmers to take upsowing of improved crop varieties of
Ragi in a larger area.
13 Dividing the area underimproved ragi varieties to the
total area under ragicultivation.
[1.3.2] Increase in Seed Replacement Ratio ofRagi (Normal 27.6)
To encourage farmers to takeup sowing of improved cropvarieties of Jowar in a larger
area.
To encourage farmers to take upsowing of improved crop varieties of
Jowar in a larger area.
14 Dividing the area underimproved jowar
varieties/hybrids to the totalarea under jowar cultivation.
[1.3.3] Increase in Seed Replacement Ratio ofJowar (Normal 27.8)
To encourage farmers to takeup sowing of improved cropvarieties of Tur in a larger
area.
To encourage farmers to take upsowing of improved crop varieties of
Tur in a larger area.
15 Dividing the area underimproved tur varieties/hybrids
to the total area under turcultivation.
[1.3.4] Increase in Seed Replacement Ratio of Tur(Normal 13.24)
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 23 of 42
Section 4:Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Success indicator Description Definition MeasurementSI.No General Comments
To encourage farmers to takeup sowing of improved cropvarieties of Groundnut in a
larger area.
To encourage farmers to take upsowing of improved crop varieties of
Groundnut in a larger area.
16 Dividing the area underimproved groundnut varieties
to the total area undergroundnut cultivation.
[1.3.5] Increase in Seed Replacement Ratio ofGroundnut (Normal 15)
Land treated for soil andwater conservation
Land treated for soil and waterconservation
17 The extent of arable and nonarable land that has been
treated under variouswatershed programmes of the
department
[2.1.1] Area developed under watershed
Motivating farmers to shift toOrganic Farming
Motivating farmers to shift to OrganicFarming
18 Area converted to organicfarming.
[2.2.1] Area converted to organic farming
To promote organic farming,Bio fertilizers will be made
available to farmers atsubsidized rates.
To promote organic farming, Biofertilizers will be made available to
farmers at subsidized rates.
19 The area and quantity of Biofertilizers supplied to farmers.
[2.2.2] Bio fertilizers distributed
To provide Micro nutrients tofarmers at subsidized rates.
To provide Micro nutrients to farmersat subsidized rates.
20 The area and quantity of Micronutrients distributed.
[2.2.3] Micronutrients distributed
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 24 of 42
Section 4:Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Success indicator Description Definition MeasurementSI.No General Comments
To avoid excess applicationof fertilizers and to know the
nutrient status of soil, soilsamples are taken from
farmers fields and sent to labfor analysis. The nutrient
contents in the soil sampleswill be communicated to
farmers to take up measuresto improve soil fertility byapplying correct dose of
fertilizers.
To avoid excess application offertilizers and to know the nutrient
status of soil, soil samples are takenfrom farmers fields and sent to lab foranalysis. The nutrient contents in thesoil samples will be communicated to
farmers to take up measures toimprove soil fertility by applying
correct dose of fertilizers.
21 The number of soil samplesanalyzed.
[2.2.4] Soil samples analyzed
To avoid excess applicationof fertilizers and to know the
nutrient status of soil, soilsamples are taken from
farmers fields and sent to labfor analysis. The nutrient
contents in the soil sampleswill be communicated to
farmers to take up measuresto improve soil fertility byapplying correct dose of
fertilizers.
To avoid excess application offertilizers and to know the nutrient
status of soil, soil samples are takenfrom farmers fields and sent to lab foranalysis. The nutrient contents in thesoil samples will be communicated to
farmers to take up measures toimprove soil fertility by applying
correct dose of fertilizers.
22 The number of soil samplesanalyzed.
[2.2.4] Soil samples analyzed
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 25 of 42
Section 4:Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Success indicator Description Definition MeasurementSI.No General Comments
To avoid excess applicationof fertilizers and to know the
nutrient status of soil, soilsamples are taken from
farmers fields and sent to labfor analysis. The nutrient
contents in the soil sampleswill be communicated to
farmers to take up measuresto improve soil fertility byapplying correct dose of
fertilizers.
To avoid excess application offertilizers and to know the nutrient
status of soil, soil samples are takenfrom farmers fields and sent to lab foranalysis. The nutrient contents in thesoil samples will be communicated to
farmers to take up measures toimprove soil fertility by applying
correct dose of fertilizers.
23 The number of soil samplesanalyzed.
[2.2.4] Soil samples analyzed
To ensure optimal nutrientlevel in soil for increased
crop production.
To ensure optimal nutrient level in soilfor increased crop production.
24 Percentage decrease innutrient deficiency of soils.
[2.2.5] % reduction in nutrient deficiency in soil
To avoid over irrigation andfor effective utilization ofwater to get higher yieldsMicro Irrigation Systems
(Drip/Sprinkler irrigation) arepopularized among farmersby giving them at subsidized
rates
To avoid over irrigation and foreffective utilization of water to get
higher yields Micro Irrigation Systems(Drip/Sprinkler irrigation) are
popularized among farmers by givingthem at subsidized rates
25 The number of farmers whohave adopted micro irrigationsystems in their field and thearea under micro irrigation.
[2.3.1] Area under protective irrigation (Agriculturalcrops)
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 26 of 42
Section 4:Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Success indicator Description Definition MeasurementSI.No General Comments
To carry out timelyagricultural activities and to
avoid labour problem in farmactivities, usage of farm
machineries is popularized.To encourage farmers to takefarm machineries, these willbe supplied at subsidised
rates.
To carry out timely agriculturalactivities and to avoid labour problem
in farm activities, usage of farmmachineries is popularized. Toencourage farmers to take farm
machineries, these will be supplied atsubsidised rates.
26 It is measured by the numberof Farm Machineries/
equipment etc., distributed fordifferent field activities to
farmers.
[2.4.1] Farmers benefited from farm machineries
To provide the farmers withquality seeds in a larger areabefore the onset of monsoon
at subsidized rate throughvarious Deptl. Schemes
To provide the farmers with qualityseeds in a larger area before the
onset of monsoon at subsidized ratethrough various Deptl. Schemes
27 Increase in the area underquality seeds over the previous
year.
[3.1.1] Area covered under quality seeds (Normal5255000 Ha)
To ensure timely andadequate distribution ofNitrogenous fertilizers to
farmers.
To ensure timely and adequatedistribution of Nitrogenous fertilizers
to farmers.
28 Increase in the quantity ofNitrogenous fertilizers
distributed over the previousyear.
[3.1.2] Increase in quantity of NitrogenousFertilizers distributed (Normal 990191.2 Tons)
To ensure timely andadequate distribution of
Phosphorous fertilizers tofarmers.
To ensure timely and adequatedistribution of Phosphorous fertilizers
to farmers.
29 Increase in the quantity ofPhosphorus fertilizers
distributed over the previousyear.
[3.1.3] Increase in quantity of PhosphorusFertilizers distributed (Normal 611542.2 Tons)
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 27 of 42
Section 4:Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Success indicator Description Definition MeasurementSI.No General Comments
To ensure timely andadequate distribution of
Potassic fertilizers to farmers.
To ensure timely and adequatedistribution of Potassic fertilizers to
farmers.
30 Increase in the quantity ofPotassic fertilizers distributed
over the previous year.
[3.1.4] Increase in quantity of Potassic Fertilizersdistributed (Normal 371079.6 Tons)
To ensure farmers with thetimely application of plantprotection measures to
reduce crop loss.
To ensure farmers with the timelyapplication of plant protectionmeasures to reduce crop loss.
31 Percentage reduction in croploss due to pest and diseases.
[3.1.5] % Reduction in crop loss due to pests anddiseases
To check the quality of theseeds distributed/ supplied to
the farmers through thedept., the samples from
stocks received at RSKs andthe dealers shops will be
drawn by the dept officialsand sent to labs for analysis
for quality check.
To check the quality of the seedsdistributed/ supplied to the farmersthrough the dept., the samples from
stocks received at RSKs and thedealers shops will be drawn by thedept officials and sent to labs for
analysis for quality check.
32 The number of seed samplesanalyzed.
[3.2.1] No. of seed samples analyzed
To check the quality of thefertilizers distributed/
supplied to the farmersthrough the dept the samplesfrom stocks received at RSKsand the dealer’s shops will be
drawn by the dept officialsand sent to labs
To check the quality of the fertilizersdistributed/ supplied to the farmersthrough the dept the samples fromstocks received at RSKs and the
dealer’s shops will be drawn by thedept officials and sent to labs for
analysis for quality check.
33 The number of standardsamples and substandard
samples analyzed.
[3.2.2] No. of fertilizer samples analyzed
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 28 of 42
Section 4:Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Success indicator Description Definition MeasurementSI.No General Comments
for analysis for quality check.To check the quality of the fertilizersdistributed/ supplied to the farmersthrough the dept the samples fromstocks received at RSKs and the
dealer’s shops will be drawn by thedept officials and sent to labs for
analysis for quality check.
33 The number of standardsamples and substandard
samples analyzed.
[3.2.2] No. of fertilizer samples analyzed
To check the quality of thePesticides distributed/supplied to the farmersthrough the dept., thesamples from stocks
received at RSKs and thedealers shops will be drawnby the dept officials and sentto labs for analysis for quality
check.
To check the quality of the Pesticidesdistributed/ supplied to the farmersthrough the dept., the samples from
stocks received at RSKs and thedealers shops will be drawn by thedept officials and sent to labs for
analysis for quality check.
34 The number of Pesticidesamples analyzed in the
laboratory.
[3.2.3] No. of pesticide samples analyzed
It is based on the concept of“seeing is believing” and
“learning by doing”. It is doneby showcasing a single or setof improved technologies in
the farmer’s field.
It is based on the concept of “seeingis believing” and “learning by doing”.It is done by showcasing a single orset of improved technologies in the
farmer’s field.
35 The area wherein thedemonstrations technologies
have been adopted
[4.1.1] Crop Demonstrations laid out
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 29 of 42
Section 4:Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Success indicator Description Definition MeasurementSI.No General Comments
Farm School is based on theconcept of “Farmer to farmer
learning” and Farm FieldSchool is a community basedpractically oriented field studyprogramme involving a group
of farmers facilitated by anextension staff. It provides a
platform for sharingexperiences and collectively
solving agri related problems.Further, Farmers from the
different districts are sent toprogressive farmers field
within the state, outside stateand outside the country
there by motivatingthemselves to adopt those
technologies.
Farm School is based on the conceptof “Farmer to farmer learning” andFarm Field School is a community
based practically oriented field studyprogramme involving a group of
farmers facilitated by an extensionstaff. It provides a platform for sharingexperiences and collectively solving
agri related problems. Further,Farmers from the different districts
are sent to progressive farmers fieldwithin the state, outside state and
outside the country there bymotivating themselves to adopt those
technologies.
36 Number of farmers who haveparticipated in the various
extension activities
[4.1.2] Number of farmers participated in FarmSchools, Farm Field Schools and Exposure visits
Trainings are conducted forcapacity building of farmers
and staff of the department atDistrict Agriculture Training
Centers and otherrecognized training institutes
within state.
Trainings are conducted for capacitybuilding of farmers and staff of thedepartment at District Agriculture
Training Centers and otherrecognized training institutes within
state.
37 Number of farmers who havebeen trained on agril.
Technologies.
[4.2.1] Farmers who have been trained onAgricultural technologies
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 30 of 42
Section 4:Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Success indicator Description Definition MeasurementSI.No General Comments
To ensure quality of highereducation and to impart
training to the unemployedpersonnel for self
employment, by introducingDiploma and Certificate
courses for a profit orientedagricultural activity.
To ensure quality of higher educationand to impart training to the
unemployed personnel for selfemployment, by introducing Diploma
and Certificate courses for a profitoriented agricultural activity.
38 The number of degree holders.[4.3.1] Outturn of Graduate, Master Graduates,Doctoral Degree & Diploma holders in differentbranches of agriculture and allied sciences.
To ensure development ofnew technologies that
enhance production andproductivity of crops.
To ensure development of newtechnologies that enhance production
and productivity of crops.
39 The number of new cropproduction technologiesdeveloped by the three
universities.
[4.4.1] Crop Production Technologies
To ensure development ofnew technologies that
minimize the crop loss due topest and diseases.
To ensure development of newtechnologies that minimize the crop
loss due to pest and diseases.
40 The number of new cropprotection technologiesdeveloped by the three
universities.
[4.4.2] Crop Protection Technologies
To ensure development ofother new agricultural
technologies.
To ensure development of other newagricultural technologies.
41 The number of new agril.Technologies developed by the
three universities
[4.4.3] Other technologies developed
To enhance the quality andmaintain hygienic conditionof the agricultural produceand also to avoid wastages
during post harvest
To enhance the quality and maintainhygienic condition of the agriculturalproduce and also to avoid wastages
during post harvest operations.
42 The number of tarpaulinsdistributed
[5.1.1] No. of Tarpaulins distributed
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 31 of 42
Section 4:Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Success indicator Description Definition MeasurementSI.No General Comments
operations.To enhance the quality and maintainhygienic condition of the agriculturalproduce and also to avoid wastages
during post harvest operations.
42 The number of tarpaulinsdistributed
[5.1.1] No. of Tarpaulins distributed
To avoid wastage duringthreshing as threshing is notdone scientifically and takeup post harvest activities
permanent threshing yardsare established by providing
subsidy to farmers/Community.
To avoid wastage during threshing asthreshing is not done scientifically and
take up post harvest activitiespermanent threshing yards are
established by providing subsidy tofarmers/ Community.
43 The number of farmers/communities benefitted
through subsidy forestablishment of threshing
yards.
[5.1.2] Threshing yards established
Farmers of common interest/growing common crops arebrought under one umbrellato work in groups by utilizing
seed money given by thedepartment. This is based onthe concept that groups will
work effectively thanindividual.
Farmers of common interest /growingcommon crops are brought under oneumbrella to work in groups by utilizingseed money given by the department.
This is based on the concept thatgroups will work effectively than
individual.
44 The number of activities takenup by the groups.
[5.2.1] Commodity Interest/ Raitha Shakthi/ SelfHelp Groups formed
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 32 of 42
Section 4:Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Success indicator Description Definition MeasurementSI.No General Comments
Farmers of common interest/growing common crops arebrought under one umbrellato work in groups by utilizing
seed money given by thedepartment. This is based onthe concept that groups will
work effectively thanindividual.
Farmers of common interest /growingcommon crops are brought under oneumbrella to work in groups by utilizingseed money given by the department.
This is based on the concept thatgroups will work effectively than
individual.
45 The number of activities takenup by the groups.
[5.2.1] Commodity Interest/ Raitha Shakthi/ SelfHelp Groups formed
Farmers of common interest/growing common crops arebrought under one umbrellato work in groups by utilizing
seed money given by thedepartment. This is based onthe concept that groups will
work effectively thanindividual.
Farmers of common interest /growingcommon crops are brought under oneumbrella to work in groups by utilizingseed money given by the department.
This is based on the concept thatgroups will work effectively than
individual.
46 The number of activities takenup by the groups.
[5.2.1] Commodity Interest/ Raitha Shakthi/ SelfHelp Groups formed
Promotion of investments inagriculture in R&D, Inputs,Farm Mechanization, Micro
irrigation, etc.,
Promotion of investments inagriculture in R&D, Inputs, Farm
Mechanization, Micro irrigation, etc.,
47 Increased investment inagriculture (including
Watershed Dept and SAUs)over the previous year.
[5.3.1] Public sector investment in agriculture(2012-13- Rs.2354.04 Crores)
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 33 of 42
Section 4:Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Success indicator Description Definition MeasurementSI.No General Comments
Promotion of moreinvestments in agriculture soas to give greater importanceto agricultural production and
productivity and in turn toimprove the farmer’s income
level.
Promotion of more investments inagriculture so as to give greater
importance to agricultural productionand productivity and in turn to
improve the farmer’s income level.
48 Increased percentage ofbudget allocation to agriculture(including Watershed Dept and
SAUs)
[5.3.2] % of Agriculture Budget to the total StateBudget
Farmers have to enroll theirfield and crop (which has
more cost of cultivation) forany natural calamity damage
for all the three season.
Farmers have to enroll their field andcrop (which has more cost of
cultivation) for any natural calamitydamage for all the three season.
49 Number of farmers coveredunder NAIS, MNAIS & WBCIS
[6.1.1] Farmers covered under NAIS, MNAIS &WBCIS (Normal 1200000)
To provide farmers withcredit so as to procure agril.
Inputs and take up timelyagril. Operations.
To provide farmers with credit so asto procure agril. Inputs and take up
timely agril. Operations.
50 The amount of loans disbursedto the agriculture sector
[6.2.1] Disbursement of credit to the primary sector( 2012-13 Rs.35173 Crore)
To minimize the risk level offarmers and to encourage
them in taking up thecultivation processes.
To minimize the risk level of farmersand to encourage them in taking up
the cultivation processes.
51 Providing the farmers withrespective dates of contingent
cropping plan
[6.3.1] Preparation of Contingent Cropping Plan
Progress of schemes(outcome) will be evaluatedby the external agencies foreffective implementation of
schemes
Progress of schemes (outcome) willbe evaluated by the external agencies
for effective implementation ofschemes
52 Percentage of developmentalschemes evaluated by external
agencies.
[7.1.1] % of developmental schemes evaluated byexternal agencies
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 34 of 42
Section 4:Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Success indicator Description Definition MeasurementSI.No General Comments
Page : 35 of 42
Section 5 :Specific Performance Requirements from other Departments
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Organisation TypeRelevant Success
Indicator
What is yourrequirement fromthis organisation
Justification for thisrequirement
LocationType
Please quantify yourrequirement fromthis Organisation
What happens ifyour requirement is
not met.State Organisation Name
Production will behampered if critical inputs
are not purchased on time.
Flow of credit to thefarmers for taking uptimely crop productionactivities.
[6.1.1] Farmers coveredunder NAIS, MNAIS &WBCIS (Normal1200000)
Farmers require financialassistance to buy critical inputs.
KarnatkaStateGovernment
BanksPublic Sector units (PSU’S)
[6.2.1] Disbursement ofcredit to the primarysector ( 2012-13Rs.35173 Crore)
Production and productivitywill be affected.
Supply of quality andCertified seeds tofarmers.
[1.3.1] Increase in SeedReplacement Ratio ofPaddy (Normal 35)
Production and Supply ofQuality seeds to farmers to
enhance production andproductivity.
An average of 14.62 lakhquintals of seeds per
annum.
KSSC, NSC, KOF
[1.3.2] Increase in SeedReplacement Ratio ofRagi (Normal 27.6)
[1.3.3] Increase in SeedReplacement Ratio ofJowar (Normal 27.8)
[1.3.4] Increase in SeedReplacement Ratio ofTur (Normal 13.24)
[1.3.5] Increase in SeedReplacement Ratio ofGroundnut (Normal 15)
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 36 of 42
Section 5 :Specific Performance Requirements from other Departments
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Organisation TypeRelevant Success
Indicator
What is yourrequirement fromthis organisation
Justification for thisrequirement
LocationType
Please quantify yourrequirement fromthis Organisation
What happens ifyour requirement is
not met.State Organisation Name
[3.1.1] Area coveredunder quality seeds(Normal 5255000 Ha)
Not possible to implementthe schemes.
Release of Funds toensure unhinderedimplementation ofvarious state sectorschemes.
[5.3.1] Public sectorinvestment in agriculture(2012-13- Rs.2354.04Crores)
Source of finance for theDepartment schemes
As per yearly budgetallocation.
Department of FinanceDepartments
[5.3.2] % of AgricultureBudget to the total StateBudget
Effective implementation ofscheme will be hampered.
To give adequatepublicity and selectsuitable beneficiariesunder the variousdepartmental schemes
[2.2.2] Bio fertilizersdistributed
Panchayath Raj institutionapproval is essential forimplementation of ZP/TP
schemes. For implementation ofall the schemes their
participation is very essential atlocal level.
Department of RuralDevelopment andPanchayat Raj
[2.2.3] Micronutrientsdistributed
[2.3.1] Area underprotective irrigation(Agricultural crops)
[2.4.1] Farmersbenefited from farmmachineries
[3.1.1] Area coveredunder quality seeds(Normal 5255000 Ha)
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 37 of 42
Section 5 :Specific Performance Requirements from other Departments
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Organisation TypeRelevant Success
Indicator
What is yourrequirement fromthis organisation
Justification for thisrequirement
LocationType
Please quantify yourrequirement fromthis Organisation
What happens ifyour requirement is
not met.State Organisation Name
[5.1.1] No. of Tarpaulinsdistributed
[5.1.2] Threshing yardsestablished
Beneficiary list offarmers farmers will beprovided.
[2.2.2] Bio fertilizersdistributed
To avail the subsidy for inputs,farm machineries, micro
irrigation units agro processingunits.
Department of Revenue
[2.2.3] Micronutrientsdistributed
[2.3.1] Area underprotective irrigation(Agricultural crops)
[2.4.1] Farmersbenefited from farmmachineries
Difficult to assess thestatus and setting thetargets for subsequent
years.Not possible to implement
the schemes.
Approval and allocationof sufficient funds.Toprovide statistical datarelated to agriculturecrops such as yield andproduction.
[1.1.1] Increase inProduction of Cereals(Normal 103.17 lakhtons)
Approval of schemes from PDis must.
For assessment of productionand productivity of the previousyear and setting up of targets
for the coming year.
Department of Planning,Programme Monitoring &Statistics
[1.1.2] Increase inproductivity of Cereals –(normal 2080 kg/ha)
[1.1.3] Increase inProduction of Pulses
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 38 of 42
Section 5 :Specific Performance Requirements from other Departments
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Organisation TypeRelevant Success
Indicator
What is yourrequirement fromthis organisation
Justification for thisrequirement
LocationType
Please quantify yourrequirement fromthis Organisation
What happens ifyour requirement is
not met.State Organisation Name
(Normal 11.43 lakhtons)
[1.1.4] Increase inproductivity of Pulses –(normal 521 kg/ha)
[1.1.5] Increase inProduction of Oilseeds(Normal 11.12 lakhtons)
[1.1.6] Increase inproductivity of Oilseeds- (normal 631 kg/ha )
[1.1.7] Increase inProduction of Cotton(Normal 7.98 lakhbales)
[1.1.8] Increase inProductivity of Cotton(Normal 328 bales/ha)
[1.1.9] Increase inProduction ofSugarcane (Normal369.16 lakh tons)
[1.1.10] Increase inProductivity ofSugarcane (Normal 94tons/ha)
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 39 of 42
Section 5 :Specific Performance Requirements from other Departments
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Organisation TypeRelevant Success
Indicator
What is yourrequirement fromthis organisation
Justification for thisrequirement
LocationType
Please quantify yourrequirement fromthis Organisation
What happens ifyour requirement is
not met.State Organisation Name
[5.3.1] Public sectorinvestment in agriculture(2012-13- Rs.2354.04Crores)
[5.3.2] % of AgricultureBudget to the total StateBudget
Leads to lower productionand productivity.
Buffer stocking offertilizers in advancefor timely supply.
[3.1.2] Increase inquantity of NitrogenousFertilizers distributed(Normal 990191.2 Tons)
Timely supply of fertilizers forbetter production and
productivity.
Procurement ofapproximately 6 to 8 lakh
tonnes of different types offertilizers from
manufacturers andstocked in advance for
timely supply.
Karnataka State Co-operative MarketingFederation
[3.1.3] Increase inquantity of PhosphorusFertilizers distributed(Normal 611542.2 Tons)
[3.1.4] Increase inquantity of PotassicFertilizers distributed(Normal 371079.6 Tons)
Page : 40 of 42
Section 6:Outcome/Impact of Department/Ministry
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Outcome/Impact ofDepartment/Ministry
Jointly responsible forinfluencing this outcome /impact with the following
department (s) / ministry(ies)
SuccessIndicator
FY 11/12 FY 13/14FY 12/13 FY 14/15 FY 15/16Unit
121.30 127Gross cropped areaIncrease in Cropping Intensity Revenue Department, Department ofRDPR & Department of Economics andStatistics
128 1291261 %
2326 2123Per hectare yield of cerealsIncrease in crop yields ofcereals
Revenue Department, Department ofRDPR & Department of Economics andStatistics
2308 233022752 kgs/ha
522 528Per hectare yield of pulsesIncrease in crop yields ofpulses
Revenue Department, Department ofRDPR & Department of Economics andStatistics
602 6115913 kgs/ha
725 795Per hectare yield of oilseedsIncrease in crop yields ofoilseeds
Revenue Department, Department ofRDPR & Department of Economics andStatistics
745 7706914 kgs/ha
340 373Per hectare yield of CottonIncrease in crop yields ofCotton
Revenue Department, Department ofRDPR & Department of Economics andStatistics
375 4003405 bales/ha
95 100Per hectare yield of SugarcaneIncrease in crop yields ofSugarcane
Revenue Department, Department ofRDPR & Department of Economics andStatistics
105 110796 tons/ha
112.28 115.00Total production of all cerealsIncrease in production ofcereals
Revenue Department, Department ofRDPR & Department of Economics andStatistics
126.70 128.60111.67 Lakh tons
11.73 15.00Total production of all pulsesIncrease in production ofpulses
Revenue Department, Department ofRDPR & Department of Economics andStatistics
16.40 16.7013.48 Lakh tons
9.79 15.75Total production of all oilseedsIncrease in production ofoilseeds
Revenue Department, Department ofRDPR & Department of Economics andStatistics
16.06 16.839.59 Lakh tons
11.99 12.7Total production of all CottonIncrease in production ofCotton
Revenue Department, Department ofRDPR & Department of Economics andStatistics
12.46 13.4110.910 Lakh
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 41 of 42
Section 6:Outcome/Impact of Department/Ministry
Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Agriculture -(2013-2014)
Outcome/Impact ofDepartment/Ministry
Jointly responsible forinfluencing this outcome /impact with the following
department (s) / ministry(ies)
SuccessIndicator
FY 11/12 FY 13/14FY 12/13 FY 14/15 FY 15/16Unit
388.08 400.0Total production of allSugarcane
Increase in production ofSugarcane
Revenue Department, Department ofRDPR & Department of Economics andStatistics
525.00 550.00303.211 Lakh tons
-2.2 4.5Annual Agriculture & alliedsectors Growth rate
Increase in Growth rate ofAgriculture & allied sectors
Revenue Department, Department ofRDPR & Department of Economics andStatistics, Department of Marketing andCo-operation, Allied Departments
4.5 4.51.812 %
16.13 16Proportion of Agriculture &allied sectors contribution tostates total GSDP
Increase in contribution ofAgriculture & allied sectors tostates GSDP
Revenue Department, Department ofRDPR & Department of Economics andStatistics, Department of Marketing andCo-operation, Allied Departments
17 1815.3213 %
30/07/2013 4.54 PMGenerated on
Page : 42 of 42