Post on 15-Jan-2016
transcript
Green and Sustainable Remediation of
Contaminated Sites
Presented by:Christopher Hurst, PE, CHMM
AMECAtlanta, GA 30144
Topics
Background on “Green” and “Sustainable”
How Sustainable Principles Apply to Remediation
Life Cycle Analysis Tool for Sustainable Remediation
Examples of Sustainable Decisions
The Future of Sustainable Remediation
After this presentation you will know the difference between Green and Sustainable
Birth of Remediation Industry Began in 1970s in response to environmental
contamination (e.g. Love Canal) Laws were created, regulatory agencies grew
and an industry emerged (RCRA, CERCLA) Remediation focused on rapid response and
often involving energy-intensive remedies (incineration)
But remedies didn’t meet cleanup levels due to technical limitations
Long-term operations, such as pump-and-treat and SVE were commonly used after initial remediation
Long term O&M was the norm
Next Came Remediation Optimization
Focused on: Understanding the site Developing an exit strategy Driving a site to reduce O&M cost and to
closure
Remedial Optimization (RPO, RSO) looked at improving implemented remedies
Evaluation of current conditions with respect to remedial objective and goals
Provided a process to improve effectiveness and efficiency
Along Came Going Green and Living Sustainably
“Sustainability” came into vogue Society wants to reduce or avoid negative
environmental impacts to allow human activity to be more sustainable
Most developed countries are rethinking how behavior, reliance on technology, and consumption of energy impact the environment
U.S. Government is requiring (EO 13514 for GHG, Water, Energy, and Waste)
Awareness of global climate change led to concern about greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
Energy-intensive remedies contribute large amounts of GHGs DuPont (2008) estimated that the difference between two remedies in
NJ could be 2 percent of the annual GHG emissions for the State
Green and Sustainable What Are They?
Green: Minimizing environmental footprint including GHG and other air emissions, waste, energy, water, materials, land and ecological impacts. Includes the use of biodegradable and ecologically friendly materials. One leg of sustainability.
Sustainable: Meeting the needs of present generations without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs (Brandtland Commission, 1987)
EPA View of Green Remediation (2010)
Goals: 100% renewable energy (Including REC) Use green remediation factors in remedy optimization Reduce natural resource and energy use Integrate clean, renewable, and innovative energy
sources On and off-site reuse of materials Specify that contractors use green remediation
practices Help communities establish networks and training
programs for green cleanups EPA Region 9 is evaluating off-site and on-site impacts
(holistic evaluation)
Sustainability and the Triple Bottom Line (more than Green) Goals:
Holistic Approach
Balances Economic Considerations Environmental Impacts Social Benefits
Green and Sustainable Remediation Green Remediation
The practice of considering environmental impacts of remedy implementation and incorporating options to minimize the environmental footprint
Current focus by EPA is more on minimizing post-remedy selection impacts Is the primary focus of most regulatory initiatives EPA recognizes that green is only part of sustainable EPA Region 9 is looking at off-site impacts as well as on-site (laboratory,
transportation) EPA’s desire is to look at impacts as part of remedy selection process
Sustainable Remediation Selection and implementation of a remedy whose net benefit on human health
and the environment is maximized through the judicious use of limited resources Encourages evaluation of impacts of a remedy during the remedy selection
process Embraces the “Triple Bottom Line” – environmental, economic and social benefits Organizations such as ASTM, ITRC, and SuRF are tackling the broader issue of
sustainable remediation
How Does Green Support Sustainable Remediation?
Green technologies and practices contribute to sustainability
Sustainable remediation can equate to green remediation Reduced energy consumption reduces GHG emissions Lower cost normally means less environmental impact Social acceptability can come from green practices
Educating public and regulators on sustainability can bring green and sustainable practices closer together
What is Sustainable Remediation? Improving traditional remediation through
adoption of a thoughtful remediation plan that incorporates the following: Actions that decrease the environmental footprint
A cost-effective yet still protective approach
A remedial approach that take into account timliness
Minimal transfer of the problem from one medium to another
An increase in community benefits
A consideration of safety associated with the action
These elements are consistent with USEPA policy and seek to take Green Remediation a step further
A Tool for Sustainable Remediation
Life Cycle Analysis (LCA): Quantifies environmental impacts of a remedial action
Provides a standardized, well documented approach Can include economic and social parameters LCA is covered under ISO 14040 and 14044 as part of
an environmental management program Can span from cradle to cradle (including operation
and land reuse) Goes well beyond life cycle cost analysis
Life Cycle Analysis for Sustainable Remediation
Parameters included in impact analysis: Air (SOx, NOx, PM, CO2, VOCs, GHG) Energy (can be renewable or not) Economics/Cost Safety to Workers and Community
Software Tools: Site Wise (free software developed by Battelle for the Army and Navy) SRT (free software developed by the Air Force) SimaPro and GaBi (professional assessment tools--$$$$$) Other proprietary and directed-use tools
Software uses an inventory relevant to parameters evaluated (air emissions per kilowatt, etc).
Quality of data used affects quality of results
How is LCA Applied
Defines the environmental footprint of project Can be applied to:
Comparing a range of alternatives (i.e. feasibility study) Determining the effect of changing an alternative (optimization study) Can be applied through out the life of a project as part of the decision
making process On the surface it is a simple concept. Implementation can be
a complex process. Software’s inventory of data simplifies the process Industry and regulators not universally familiar with concepts
(understand carbon foot-print which is related) LCA can lead to more risk based remedial action Regulators may view this as “Green Washing” remediation
LCA Tool Output (for the project lifecycle)
Air Emissions (Tons)Energy Consumption (KW, MW or GW)Project Cost (NPV or total)Reduction of Waste GenerationSafety/accident risk compared to environmental risk
Can compare to emissions from cars, energy consumption by household, etc.
16
02,000,000.4,000,000.6,000,000.8,000,000.
10,000,000.12,000,000.14,000,000.16,000,000.18,000,000.
Die
sel (
on-s
ite)
Gas
olin
e (o
n-site
use
)N
atur
al g
as (o
n-site
use
)D
iese
l (off
-site
use
)G
asol
ine
(off-s
ite u
se)
Nat
ural
gas
(off-s
ite u
se)
On-
site
ele
ctri
city
use
Elec
tric
ity tr
ansm
issi
on*
Elec
tric
ity p
rodu
ction
*PV
CH
DPE
Stee
lSt
ainl
ess
Stee
lG
rave
l/sa
ndCe
men
t Gro
utCo
ncre
teBe
nton
iteRe
gene
rate
d G
AC
Bioi
njec
tion
(Mol
asse
s)Bi
oinj
ectio
n (
Chee
se W
hey)
Bioi
njec
tion
(Veg
etab
le O
il)D
iese
l Pro
duce
dG
asol
ine
Prod
uced
Nat
ural
Gas
Pro
duce
dG
roun
dwat
er E
xtra
cted
On
-site
Pota
ble
Wat
er P
rodu
ced
Pota
ble
Wat
er T
rans
port
edPo
tabl
e W
ater
Use
dO
ther
On-S
ite W
ater
Use
dO
ff-si
te w
aste
wat
er tr
eatm
ent
Solid
Was
te G
ener
ation
Solid
Was
te D
ispo
sal
Haz
ardo
us W
aste
Gen
erati
onH
azar
dous
Was
te D
ispo
sal
Labo
rato
ry A
naly
sis
On-
site
pro
cess
em
issi
ons
(HA
Ps)
On-
site
pro
cess
em
issi
ons
(GH
Gs)
Pump and Treat Parameter BreakdownTotal On-Site & Off-Site CO2e Emitted (lbs)
electricity production
carbon regeneration
wastewater treatment at POTW
Romic East Palo Alto – Pump & Treat
CO2e Emitted (lbs)
Key Contributors to Environmental Footprint
Information courtesy of EPA Region 9
Former Gun Club: RCRA Corrective Action Goals Reduce, Reuse & Recycle Wastes & Raw Materials Reduce Transportation Related Impacts
Implementation (Required Significant Pre-Planning) Waste disposal profiling (lead & PAHs) of each location
conducted in advance of excavation Excavation depth minimized through constant field oversight
of each excavation cell Separated soil during removal as either non hazardous or
hazardous
Location 1 -- 29,000 tons (39% total) of non-haz soil was recycled for use as Portland Cement.
Location 2 -- 5,500 tons (96% total) of non-haz soil was recycled for use as Portland Cement
Sustainable Remediation: Soil Excavation
Green: reuse of material instead of disposal
Sustainable Remediation: Former MGP Site Achieved successful risk-based closure by evaluating site-specific toxicity
and exposure
Managed removal of 2000+ gallons of coal tar and MGP residuals
Constructed 2 impermeable barrier and 2 permeable barrier landfills (9+ acres total) in lieu of excavation and offsite disposal
Installed in situ lining in sanitary and storm sewer to eliminate groundwater infiltration/migration
Incorporated significant landscape improvements to ensure community acceptance and satisfaction
Green: Xeriscape landscaping to reduce water demand
Sustainable Remediation: Landfill Cap a “Brightfield” Redevelopment
Landfill Cap redeveloped into a renewable (solar) energy facility
1,395 solar modules450 kw of electricityProvides in annual reduction of 300 tons of CO2
Environmental and solar energy education center were incorporated into the new facility
All community concerns were incorporated into the cleanup and redevelopment plans
Supports the communities economic development strategy
Green: Provides Alternative Energy Source
Sustainable Remediation Project Example Background
Contaminated Site in East Point, GA: acetone, TCE, Benzene Initially pump and treat used for remediation
Sustainable remedy Turn off pump and treat Bio-sparge to treat Acetone/Benzene in soil and groundwater No-purge sampling to monitor performance Added lactate to TCE well
No net increase in annual cost (treatment cost < P&T cost) Achieved NFA from EPA within 24 months In retrospect:
Environmental Protection: closed site with no further action Economic Consideration: No increase in present cost, no future cost Social: Allowed unrestricted use of blighted property (light industrial)
Sustainable Remediation: Former Manufacturing Facility
Closed RCRA Landfill Neighbor wanted property Candidate for Brownfield Program (if not RCRA) Off-site plume Excavated shallow soil and treated with
chemical oxidants ( 20 tons permanganate) Proceeds from property sale covered
remediation cost Blighted property became useful parking lot and
tennis courts Improved appearance and community
acceptance of area
Green: Increased society’s perception of property value
Future of Sustainable Remediation
DoD facilities are adding Sustainable Remediation to Feasibility Study evaluation criteria
Sustainable Remediation Standards are under development SuRF Guidance Document 2011 ASTM Standard expected in 2012-2013 ITRC Guidance expected in 2012-2013
Ongoing Meetings with state and federal regulators to discuss benefits of Sustainable Remediation (ITRC, SuRF)
Industries adding Sustainable Remediation to evaluation criteria
In many cases, Sustainable Remediation has attractive economic payback and improves public image
Tough Questions to Consider
How do you weigh the need for site remediation against the resources utilized?
How to determine unintended consequences resulting from remediation?
Do you evaluate sustainability metrics be before or after remedy selection?
Weighting of short-term significant environmental footprint (e.g. excavation, thermal treatment) against a longer period (e.g. SVE, pump and treat)?
Weighing environmental protection against environmental harm (emissions), economic impact, and social benefits?
Tenets of Green and Sustainable Remediation
Implement remediation projects in an environmentally responsible manner (Green)
Recognize that some metrics have limited role on time-critical remediation projects (i.e. imminent risk)
Protection of human health and the environment are baseline requirements
All relevant stakeholders should have a say in the decision-making and by default the remedy selection
Goals include reduced consumption of energy, water and other natural resources; maximization of reuse/recycling; and minimization of carbon footprint, GHGs, and any other deleterious effect of remediation
We can make better remediation decisions by accounting for economic and social metrics
Make Sustainable Remediation part of Good Business
What is sustainable about moving a Lighthouse?
• Environmental– Completed with minimal environmental impact.– Preservation in place would have resulted in collapse,
protection against collapse would have had negative environmental impacts
• Economic– Tourist draw to area– Jobs and tourist related income
• Social – National Historic Site– Provides educational and recreational opportunities
for visitors– Preserves our national heritage
5,000 ton structure moved 2,900 feet at a cost of $10 million
Thank You
Questions?