How to Write a Competitive NSF CAREER Proposal Lucy Deckard Academic Research Funding Strategies,...

Post on 27-Dec-2015

221 views 0 download

transcript

How to Write a Competitive NSF CAREER Proposal

Lucy DeckardAcademic Research Funding Strategies, LLCLdeckard@academicresearchgrants.com

A webinar for junior faculty

March 24, 2015

Academic Research Funding Strategies, LLC

Our goal: To help your institution, faculty and staff to develop the skills they need to compete successfully for research funding.

http://academicresearchgrants.com

My contact Info: Lucy DeckardLDeckard@academicresearchgrants.com979-693-0825

2

OverviewNSF Faculty Early Career Development Program (CAREER)

Before you start writing

Writing the proposal step-by-step

If you don’t get funded this round

3

Grants Specifically for Early Career and Junior Faculty

NSF CAREER approx. 600 awards/yearNon-tenured, tenure trackAll disciplines supported by NSFDue late July

ONR Young InvestigatorApprox. 20 awards/yearFirst tenure track appt started in the last 5 yearsDisciplines of interest to Navy (see BAA)Due March 4, 2015

AFOSR Young InvestigatorApprox. 30 awards/yearPhD or equivalent in the last 5 yearsDisciplines of interest to Air ForceLast due Sept.

4

Grants Specifically for Early Career and Junior Faculty

DARPA Young Faculty AwardApprox. 30 - 40 awardsUntenured within 5 years of starting appt.Last due January 2014; no new solicitation

DOE Early CareerApprox. 21 university awards last year (doesn’t count NL awards)Tenure track, untenured within 10 years of PhDPre-applications typ. due Sept.

NIH K99 R00Approx. 114 awardsPostdoc with less than 5 years postdoc trainingDue Feb, June, Oct.

5

Grants Specifically for Early Career and Junior Faculty

NIH Director’s Early Independence AwardApprox. 10Received PhD or terminal degree within last 12 months or will receive within the next 12 monthsTyp. due January

NIH Directors New Innovator AwardApprox. 50 fundedWithin 10 years of PhD/terminal degree and have not received an R01Due October

Foundations and professional societiesAmerican Chemical Society Doctoral New Investigator GrantsCan be very targeted: e.g., Hogg Foundation Mental Health Research Grants for Tenure-Track Assistant Professors in Texas

6

NIH K AwardsDifferent programs for different stages in your career

Generally for those in transitionSee K-Kiosk and Career Award Wizard to see what might fit you

For All Career-Type ProgramsBe sure you’re eligibleUnderstand the application requirementsBe sure you understand the agency and programPlace your project in context

What are your long-term research plans?What are your long-term education plans (if applicable)?Relate these plans to the interests of the agency

8

Basics of the NSF CAREER

The NSF Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program

Program PageSolicitationFAQs pageCAREER Contacts (by division)Staggered due dates by directorate

BIO, CISE, EHR: July 21, 2015ENG: July 22, 2015GEO, MPS, SBE: July 23, 2015

CAREER EligibilityUntenured (until Oct. 1)Tenure trackAssistant Professor or equivalentHave not applied for a CAREER more than twice before Propose to conduct research in an area that NSF fundsNo co-PIs or senior personnel allowed

11

CAREER in a Nutshell5 years of fundingMinimum $400K total ($500K for ENG, BIO and Polar Programs)Must apply to a particular program within a directorate – Key!Different NSF divisions and directorates use the CAREER program differently

12

What is NSF Trying to Accomplish with CAREER?

Nurture the next generation of leading researchers/educatorsChange academic culture

Integrate education and researchSupport diversityReach out to the larger communityInnovate in education

13

NSF’s OrganizationDivided into directorates:

Biological Sciences (BIO)Computer and Information Science and Eng (CISE)Education and Human Resources (EHR)Engineering (ENG)Geosciences (GEO)Mathematical and Physical Sciences (MPS)Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences (SBE)Office of Polar Programs (OPP)

Each directorate divided into divisions and programs

14

15

NSF CAREER Proposals Submitted

From http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/outreach/grantsconf/career_june14.pdf

16

NSF CAREER Proposals Awarded

From http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/outreach/grantsconf/career_june14.pdf

NSF CAREER Success Rate

From http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/outreach/grantsconf/career_june14.pdf

Plan to Reapply!Odds are you won’t get funded with your first applicationYour proposal should get stronger with each applicationPlanning and intelligent persistence are key

18

Key Points for CAREERCareer Development Plan to “build a firm

foundation for a lifetime of integrated contributions to research and education”

Research PlanIntegrated Education PlanPlus

Description of how research and education are integrated with each otherResults of Previous NSF support, if applicableDepartment Head letter

19

Getting Started

20

Understand the Review CriteriaIntellectual Merit and Broader Impacts equally weightedIs your research significant and innovative?Do you have the skills and resources to carry out the project?Do you have the support of your department?Are your research and education integrated?Does your education plan go beyond what is expected for all Assistant Professors?Is your project likely to be successful ?Do you address diversity, benefits to society?

21

Common Reasons for Not Funding CAREER Proposals

“Research is either too ambitious or too narrowly focusedProposed methods do not address the stated research goalsEducational component is either limited to routine courses or is unrealistically overambitiousIntegration of research and education is weak or uninspired”

Quoted from J. Tornow presentation at QEM Workshop

22

Selecting a Research IdeaWhat do you want to do?Does it address important questions in your field?Is it novel and cutting-edge?Do you have the background and resources to accomplish your goals?

If you’re moving into a new but related area, be sure to discuss collaborations that will fill any gaps

Will it contribute to your career goals?Will it contribute to your department’s and institution’s goals?

23

Are You Ready to Apply?Do you have publications in or related to your research topic?How many years do you have until you go up for tenure?If applicable, do you have your lab set up and do you have grad students?If you need preliminary data, do you have it?

24

Do I Need Preliminary Data?Expectations vary by disciplineHow risky is your research idea?

Do you need preliminary data to demonstrate feasibility?

How strong is your track record?Do you need to demonstrate your mastery of the methodology?

Are there potential showstoppers that could be explored with some preliminary experiments/calculations?

25

Have a High Risk/High Payoff Idea?But you need funds to generate preliminary data?Explore NSF’s EAGER (Early-Concept Grants for Exploratory Research)

Up to $300K for 2 yearsTalk to Program Officer

May go on to submit a standard grant to a core program or a CAREER

26

Before You Start Writing

27

Important!

Talk to your Department Head/ChairMake sure she supports your research and education goalsDiscuss Department Head letter early

28

Determine which NSF Program to Apply ToSubmitting to the wrong program can doom a good proposal!NSF web site (see video)

Check program goalsSearch awarded CAREER projects

E-mail or call program directorTalk to senior researchers in your areaInterdisciplinary? Talk to program officers

29

http://www.nsf.gov/staff/orglist.jsp

Find your division

Find your program

Talk to Your NSF Program DirectorSend a short email briefly describing your project idea and asking for an appointment for a phone discussionDiscuss your project with the Program DirectorListen carefully to the PD’s advice and commentsHopefully this will be the start of a long relationship

34

NSF CAREER vs. NSF Core Proposal5 year project vs. 2 or 3 year project$400K and up vs. $200K and upNo co-PIs vs. co-PIs allowedCompeting with other junior faculty only vs. competing with investigators at all levels CAREER most prestigious; PECASE eligible

35

The Secret to Planning a Strong Education Component…

Approach it with same rigor as your research plan!

Important: The Education Component is not community service; it is a project!

I sentence you to 12 hours talking to 2nd graders about quantum physics

Choose one main projectPut lots of planning and effort into that ideaTry to make it stand outThink through the logisticsTie into existing infrastructure if availableSeek help if you need it

Education Plan TipsIdentify the need you are addressingHave clear goals and measurable objectivesAddress diversity!Have a strong assessment planPlan how you will disseminate your resultsAn innovative, focused education plan is better than many standard activities

More Education Plan TipsBe sure to include funding in the budget to support your education activitiesMay need to look for other resources you can leverageThink about how you can enhance even standard activities (e.g., mentoring your graduate students)Including undergrads in research is expected

40

Typical Education PlansCan target various populationsFor example:

New or updated undergrad or grad courses using innovative educational approaches Undergraduate research experiences including innovative elementsRecruiting activities with underrepresented studentsMentoring high school students in Science Fair projectsParticipating in a science summer camp with middle school studentsWorking with elementary teachers to incorporate elements of your research into their curriculaReaching out to stakeholders in the communityCommunicating your research to the public in an innovative way

41

Don’t Reinvent the WheelTalk to education experts at your institutionRead the literature

Education Resources Information CenterMSPnetSTEPnet Literature cited in the CAREER solicitationNational Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES) – statistics supporting need/motivation

(See Handout for more)

42

Leverage Infrastructure and Activities at Your Institution

NSF Research Experiences for Undergraduates SitesSummer STEM camps for K-12 studentsConnections to community colleges and/or high schoolsStudent associations for underrepresented minority (URM) STEM students (e.g., SACNAS, NSBE, SWE, etc.)Centers for Teaching and Learning

What if You’re an Education Researcher?

You still need an education plan that’s distinct from your researchThink about:

Ways to reach out beyond your normal constituencyInnovative dissemination strategiesWays to encourage and mentor the next generation of education researchers or educators beyond what is expected

What Groups are Underrepresented?Typically African Americans, Hispanics, Native Americans, U.S. Pacific IslandersWomen if underrepresented in the disciplineOften first-generation college studentsUsually not:

International studentsAsian Americans

Recruit Your CollaboratorsCAREER does not allow co-PIs or senior personnelBut you can have a collaborator

Can pay for equipment accessCan help support a collaborator’s student

Use collaborators to fill a gap in your expertise or capabilities

For example, educational collaborator, collaborator from a different discipline, collaborator with facilities/equipment you need

46

Contact Your Office of Sponsored Projects

Let them know you plan to submit a CAREERThey can often help you with:

Scheduling and approvalsBudgetsFastlaneSometimes with review criteria and textSubmission

47

Schedule with Lots of Intermediate DeadlinesTask Person

ResponsibleDeadline

First draft of Project Description complete

Second draft of Project Description complete

Third draft of Project Description complete

Send to internal reviewers/mentors

Receive feedback from reviewers/mentors

Revise Project Description – Draft 4 complete

Close-to-final draft of Project Description

Final draft ready for check

Upload final draft

Submit 2 days before due

ACK!

Warning: Stuff happens!

Writing Your CAREER Proposal

50

Grantsmanship

Things to Keep in

Mind

Put Yourself in the Shoes of the Reviewer!

52

53

54

Grantsmanship TipsUse figures, flow charts, tables, bullet lists, etc.Use heading and subheadings to help reviewers locate the informationBold, italics and underlining (used judiciously) can help reviewers find important pointsNo tiny fonts or illegible figure labelsCaptions explain the point of your figure

55

Writing Your Proposal Step-by-Step

NSF CAREER Proposal ElementsProject Summary (1 page)Project Description (15 pages)References CitedSupplementary Documents

Letters of collaborationDH/Chair LetterData Management PlanPostdoc Mentoring Plan (if applicable)

Biosketch (2 pages)Current & Pending FormBudgetBudget Justification (3 pages)Facilities and Equipment

57

FormatFollow NSF’s Grant Proposal Guidehttp://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf15001/gpg_index.jsp

Section IIB – Fonts, etc. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf15001/gpg_2.jsp#IIB

1” margins all aroundPages numbered by sectionsAllowed fonts:

Arial, Courier New, or Palatino Linotype at a font size of 10 points or larger Times New Roman at a font size of 11 points or largerComputer Modern family of fonts at a font size of 11 points or larger

ANDNo more than 6 lines of text within a vertical space of 1 inch

58

Project SummaryThis may be the only thing the reviewer will readState your goals/objectives/ hypotheses clearlyValue of your project (research and education) must be clear and compelling!Written in 3rd personTypically written last4600 Characters (~1 page)

59

New: Project Summary StructureThree boxes, uploaded separately

OverviewIntellectual MeritBroader Impacts

Aggregate of all three boxes cannot exceed 4,600 characters

Overview SectionObjectivesMethods to be employedDescription of activity that will result if the proposal is funded

Intellectual MeritIntellectual Merit: The intellectual Merit criterion encompasses the potential to advance knowledge (new)Previous:

How well does your project advance knowledge and understanding ?How creative, original or potentially transformative are the concepts?How well conceived and organized is the proposed activity, and will you have sufficient resources?How well qualified is the proposer to conduct the project?

62

Broader ImpactsBroader Impacts: The Broader Impacts criterion encompasses the potential to benefit society and contribute to the achievement of specific, desired societal outcomes. (new)Previous:

How well does the project advance discovery while promoting teaching, training and learning?To what extent will it enhance infrastructure for research and education?How well will it broaden participation of underrepresented groups?Will the results be broadly disseminated?What are the benefits to society?

63

Project SummaryExample: Handout #4Project Summary from Jairo Sinova’s successful CAREER awarded 2006

Clear goals stated earlyNew knowledge to be generated PI’s collaborations, qualificationsBroader impacts contain specifics

64

Project Description (15 pages)Flexible StructureTypical Outline

Introduction, overview, objectives, significanceBackground (SOA and lit review)Preliminary Results/Prior WorkExperimental Plan/Research Plan/MethodologyEducation PlanBroader ImpactsTimeline

65

Get to the exciting stuff here!

The Project Description: Getting Started

First Para-graph

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Zzzzzzz

Revi

ewer

’s Att

entio

n Le

vel

Generic Intro

Long, unconnected background

Strong, Unique Intro

Concise background that provides context

Get to the exciting stuff here!

Put Your Project in Context

The Big Question orThe Big Need

Preliminary Work Funded project 1 Further work

Project Goals/Specific Aims Outcomes

What is the kernel of your great idea?What you will accomplishThe approach you will useThe problem you’re addressingNew tools or resources you’ll bring to the problem

Put it up front!

Project DescriptionIntroduction, overview, objectives, significanceBackground (SOA and lit review)Preliminary Results/Prior WorkExperimental Plan/Research Plan/MethodologyEducation PlanBroader ImpactsTimeline

69

Introduction and OverviewProvide reviewers with an outline of your proposed project which you will fill in later (1 – 2 pages)

70

Tell Your Project Story

71

After the Intro & OverviewReviewer should be intrigued and excited Should have a basic understanding of your project and why it’s importantShould be convinced that this research is a great ideaWill just be looking for details to confirm you can do what you say you’ll do(see Handout)

Project DescriptionIntroduction, overview, objectives, significanceBackground (SOA and lit review)Preliminary Results/Prior WorkExperimental Plan/Research Plan/MethodologyEducation PlanBroader ImpactsTimeline

73

BackgroundWhat is the current state of knowledge and how does this relate to your project?What are the holes in knowledge and how will your research fill them?Cite important work but don’t provide a comprehensive literature review covering the entire history of the subjectKeep relating discussion to your projectTypical length: 3 – 4 pages

74

Project DescriptionIntroduction, overview, objectives, significanceBackground (SOA and lit review)Preliminary Results/Prior WorkExperimental Plan/Research Plan/MethodologyEducation PlanBroader ImpactsTimeline

75

Preliminary Results/Prior WorkSometimes folded in with Background, but be careful!Summarize up front the significance of your data as it relates to your project (see Handout #6)Beware getting bogged down in too many detailsBe clear who did the work – beware passive voice and the royal “we”

76

Project DescriptionIntroduction, overview, objectives, significanceBackground (SOA and lit review)Preliminary Results/Prior WorkExperimental Plan/Research Plan/MethodologyEducation PlanBroader ImpactsTimeline

77

This is where things get complex!

Have a clear structureProject Goals

Objectives

Research Questions/Hypotheses

Phases

Tasks

Subtasks

For example…

Research PlanGive a concise overview before launching into details.

What are the objectives?What are the required tasks?What will be your overall approach?What are the roles of your collaborators?(see Handout #7)

80

Research PlanHow will you accomplish your goals, step by step?Need enough details to convince reviewers you have a well-developed plan that is likely to succeedBut don’t drown reviewers in non-essential detailsMore details needed for the first 2 or 3 yearsDiscuss how you will deal with any potential showstoppers

81

Research PlanIf you need special resources (access to an instrument, a special cell line, etc.) explain how you will get themBe clear what role your collaborators will play

Name them and briefly describe their qualificationsRefer reviewers to letters of collaboration

82

Example Flow Charts

Task 1: description

Task 2: description

Task 3: description

Output of task 1

Task 4: description of how it all comes together in this task

Project Outcomes

Output of Task 3

Output of Task 2

Common MistakesRambling discussion of the problem and possible approaches to solving it with no clear structureVague description of objectives

Don’t say “We will explore phenomenon x”Say “We will measure x, y and z” or “We will determine if y and z affect x”

Too applied with no theoretical framework (esp. engineering)

We will develop a widget (e.g., new sensor, new material)

Project DescriptionIntroduction, overview, objectives, significanceBackground (SOA and lit review)Preliminary Results/Prior WorkExperimental Plan/Research Plan/MethodologyEducation PlanBroader ImpactsTimeline

85

Education PlanWhat are your goals and objectives?What motivates your plan?What is the state of knowledge about this issue, the proposed approach, etc. (cite educational literature!)Do you have any preliminary results or prior related experience?How will you assess whether you are successful?How will you disseminate your results?

86

Education PlanAssessment

Have clear, measurable objectivesExplain how you will assess whether you met these objectives

Formative: How are we doing and can we improve?Summative: At the end, did we meet our objectives?

DisseminationHow will other educators benefit from what you’ve learned or developed?Will you make products of your efforts available for others to use?

See example Education Outline in Handout #8.

87

Education PlanScope and length of section

Depends on the mission of your institutionResearch Intensive: typically around 3 - 4 pagesPredominantly undergrad or community college: can be longer

88

Project DescriptionIntroduction, overview, objectives, significanceBackground (SOA and lit review)Preliminary Results/Prior WorkExperimental Plan/Research Plan/MethodologyEducation PlanBroader ImpactsTimeline

89

Broader ImpactsBroader impacts of the science

How will other fields benefit?What new science will be enabledHow will society benefit?

Broader impacts of your education planHow will your project improve education? How will your project enhance diversity?How will you reach beyond the ivory tower?How will society/stakeholders benefit?

Project DescriptionIntroduction, overview, objectives, significanceBackground (SOA and lit review)Preliminary Results/Prior WorkExperimental Plan/Research Plan/MethodologyEducation PlanBroader ImpactsTimeline

91

Schedule and MilestonesWhat do you expect to have accomplished after 6 months? After 1 year? After 18 months? Etc.Provides easy-to-find synopsis of your approach for reviewersDemonstrates that your project is properly scopedShows that your project is well thought out

Example Flow Charts and SchedulesYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

Objective 1: Development of the hoosits

Integration and calibration

Optimization of frumpits measurement methodology

Objective 2: Assess XYZ

XYZ spectroscopy

MOA microscopy

ABC testing

Pandax studies

Objective 3: Integrate hoosits with XYZ

Instrument integration

Instrument testing

Demonstration

Results of Prior NSF SupportRequired if had any NSF support in last 5 yearsInclude one most applicable projectDescribe overview, intellectual merit, broader impactsCite all products that came out of the projectSee GPG for all the rules

End of Project Description (15 pages)

Other Required Components

References CitedSeparate sectionNo page limitFollow GPG rulesIf available online, include urlWebsites may be included in references cited but not in body of the textBe sure to cite important works and works of likely reviewers

97

Collaboration Letters – New!One-sentence statement (in new solicitation)“If the proposal submitted by Dr. [insert the full name of the Principal Investigator] entitled [insert the proposal title] is selected for funding by the NSF, it is my intent to collaborate and/or commit resources as detailed in the Project Description.”Rest of info on collaboration should be contained in the Project DescriptionNo letters of support or recommendation allowed

98

BudgetTypical budget a little over $80K per year (except BIO), including indirect costsTypically covers

Research Intensive Universities: PI’s salary for one summer month and a graduate studentFunds to support your educational componentTravel to conferences, etc. (include students)Materials and suppliesMaybe funds for undergraduate researchers (hourly pay)

Start early on your budget!

99

Budget Justification

Important documentMany reviewers look at this to see what your real priorities areProvides an additional up to 3 pages to help justify your project

100

Department Head LetterReviewers really look at these!Should make it clear that your head/chair knows what you are proposingInclude required language regarding your eligibility (see solicitation)Should discuss support for education and research plan (can include your start-up package, logistical support, etc.)Discuss how you will be mentored in research and educationExplain how your project will support goals of the department (see example in Handout #9)Up to 2 pages long

101

Additional FormsNSF format 2-page biosketch

Section II.C.f(i) – Biosketch format (2 pages)http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf13001/gpg_2.jsp#IIC2f

Follow this religiously! Non-compliant biosketches are a common reason for return without review.

Current & Pending form – all external funding or pending proposalsFacilities and Instrumentation – use this to reassure reviewers that you have access to needed facilities

102

Additional FormsData Management Plan (max 2 pages)

What data will you generate?How will you make it available to others?How will you store it? (Check with your library)See http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf13001/gpg_2.jsp#IIC2j

Postdoc Mentoring Plan (max 1 page)Required if postdoc on budgetHow will you mentor your postdoc and provide professional development?See http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf13001/gpg_2.jsp#IIC2j

103

You’ve finished a draft!

Ask others to read it and give you feedbackIs it clear? Is it compelling? Did they see any technical weaknesses that should be addressed?Include time for revisions

104

Submitting Your ProposalUploaded into Fastlane (check the file after it is uploaded!)Follow the requirements of our institution (check with Office of Sponsored Projects or equivalent)

Routing and ApprovalQuality CheckUploadingSubmittal (must be done by an institutional representative)

Include suggestions for reviewersTry to submit at least a day before the deadline

105

The Review ProcessVaries by DivisionMost combination

Ad hoc (mail) reviews (usually 3)Panel (may be CAREER panel, or may be a general panel)

Reviewers rate all proposalsExcellent, Very Good, Good, Fair, Poor

Provide recommendationFund, High Priority; Fund if Possible; Do Not Fund

106

Program OfficerMakes a list of proposals would like to fund based on

Recommendations of reviewersPortfolio of funded projectsInterests of ProgramTypes of institutions

Works down the list until runs out of moneySometimes figures out ways to squeeze out a little more money to fund an extra projectThis process can take a while

107

If you get fundedCelebrate!

Use this grant as a foundation for more fundingCommunicate with your Program DirectorPublishGraduate studentsWork to make your education component a success

Think about supplementsResearch Experiences for UndergraduatesFaculty Opportunity Award, etc.

108

If you don’t get funded…Read the reviewsGet mad/depressedRemember that even the most prominent scientists have a drawer full of declined proposalsPut the reviews in a drawer for a few daysRead the reviews again carefully

109

Analyzing the ReviewsDid the reviewers have particular concerns that you can address?Were the reviewers confused or unclear about your project?Were the reviewers unimpressed by the significance or novelty of your research idea?Were the reviewers generally favorable, with no clear issues brought up?Did the project topic not fit the program?Be careful about chasing one comment by one reviewer – look at the Panel Summary

110

Call the Program OfficerBe nice!Ask for clarification of reviewer commentsAsk for advice

Should you resubmit?Should you apply to a different program?What would strengthen your proposal?

111

Make Your DecisionResubmit a CAREER next year to the same programUse next year to revamp your project, generate preliminary data, etc. and resubmit the following yearResubmit a CAREER to a different program next yearRevamp the project and submit to a core programRevamp the proposal and submit to a different agencyStart again with an entirely new idea

112

Preparing to ResubmitContinue working on your ideas

Each iteration of your proposal should be more developed and if possible have more preliminary dataThis means your education ideas also

Volunteer to be a reviewerDon’t have to be funded by NSFSee what makes a successful proposal

113

No Matter WhatYour next proposal will be better than your lastYou have gotten to know an NSF Program OfficerYou have learned from the experience and developed new skills

Good luck!

114

Questions?

115