Post on 05-Jul-2015
description
transcript
IDEAlliance XML Case Study
InDesign Tagging to HTML Navigation
Presented for IDEAlliance Educational Seminars on June 14, 2011 by:
Cathy PalmerSenior Applications InstructorNew Horizons of WisconsinConsulting & Training for InDesign/XML
XML Case Study: InDesign Tagging to HTML Navigation
IDEAlliance XML Case Study 14 June 2011
Approach XML from the graphic designer’s point of view…
Given existing print documents, how do you get XML?
Given XML, how to design with it?
The hands-on realities of tagging, extracting, using XML starting from InDesign files.
XML Case Study: InDesign Tagging to HTML Navigation
IDEAlliance XML Case Study 14 June 2011
Case Study:
Agriculture Research – Pest Management DirectoryExample:
scientific reference directory of detailed data and best practices for using pesticides and herbicides
A guide to managing weeds, insects, and diseases
in corn, soybeans, forages, and small grains
Pest Management
in Field Crops
2011
XML Case Study: InDesign Tagging to HTML Navigation
IDEAlliance XML Case Study 14 June 2011
Case Study:
Agriculture Research – Pest Management DirectoryScenario:
• many authors, uncoordinated content
• no standard tags
• graphic designer to organize data
STORED GRAIN INSECTS
PERENNIAL WEEDSSMALL GRAINS
APPENDIXFORAGES & PASTURES
SOYBEAN diseasesCORN
PRINCIPLES OF PEST MNGMT.
Table 3-11. Fungicides registered for foliar soybean diseases in Wisconsin
Trade name Active ingredient Chemical family FRACa Rate/a Remarks
Alto 100 SL cyproconazole triazole 3 2.75–5.5 fl oz Do not exceed 11 fl oz/a Alto 100 SL or 0.072 lb ai/a of cyproconazole-containing products per season. Do not apply within 30 days of har-vest. Do not graze forage within 14 days after an application or use soybean forage or hay as livestock feed if making more than one applica-tion at the 5.5 fl oz/a rate.
Bravo Weather Stik
chlorothalonil chloronitrile M5 1.0–2.0 pt Labeled for suppression of rust. Wait at least 14 days between treatments and do not exceed three applications per season. Do not apply more than 6 pt/a. Do not feed treated hay or threshing to livestock. Do not harvest for grain within 6 weeks of last treatment.
Cuprofix Ultra 40 Copper sulfate inorganic M1 0.75–3.0 lb See label for use instructions.Domark 230 ME tetraconazole triazole 3 4.0–5.0 fl oz Make application at soybean growth stage R3
(early pod fill) or when conditions are favor-able for disease development. Repeat applica-tion 15 to 21 days after first application if dis-ease pressure is heavy. Under severe disease conditions the higher rate and shorter spray intervals should be used.
Echo 720 chlorothalonil chloronitrile M5 1.0–2.5 pt Do not feed treated soybean hay or threshing to livestock. Do not harvest for grain within 42 days of last treatment.
Echo 90 DF chlorothalonil chloronitrile M5 1.25–2.0 lb Do not feed treated soybean hay or threshing to livestock. Do not harvest for grain within 42 days of last treatment.
Echo Zn chlorothalonil chloronitrile M5 2.0–3.5 pt Do not feed treated soybean hay or threshing to livestock. Do not harvest for grain within 42 days of last treatment.
Folicur 3.6 F tebuconazole triazole 3 3.0–4.0 fl oz Applications may not be made within 21 days of harvest. Do not apply more than 12 fl oz/a per season or exceed three applications per season.
Headline pyraclostrobin strobilurin 11 6.0–12.0 fl oz Begin applications prior to disease develop-ment and continue on a 7- to 14-day interval if conditions are conducive. Use the higher rate and shorter interval when disease pressure is high. Minimum time from application to har-vest is 21 days. Forage may be fed no sooner than 14 days after last application. Hay may be fed no sooner than 21 days after last treatment. Do not apply more than 24 oz/a per season or make more than two applications before alter-nating to a labeled non-Group 11 fungicide with a different mode of action.
a FRAC codes indicate the modes of action for each fungicide; multiple applications of fungicides (continued) from the same group increases the chances for the fungus developing resistance.
1
1
Table 2-13. Fungicides labeled for leaf diseases of field corn (hybrid seed production and grain)
Trade nameActive ingredient
FRAC code
Amount of product/a Remarks
Bravo Weather Stik chlorothalonil M5 0.75–2.0 pt Common rust, Helminthosporium leaf blight. Use only on corn grown for seed. For advanced disease problems, use 1.5–2.0 pt/a. —Do not exceed 12 pt/a (9 lb ai/a) per season. Do not apply within 14 days of harvest. (Seed protection only.)
Bumper 41.8 EC propiconazole 3 2–4 fl oz Helminthosporium leaf blight. Apply 2–4 fl oz/a when disease first appears and continue on a 7- to 14-day schedule. Rusts. Apply 4 fl oz/a when rust pustules first appear and continue on a 7- to 14-day schedule. Gray leaf spot, eyespot. Apply 4 fl oz/a when disease first appears. If conditions favorable for disease persist, repeat at 14-day intervals. —Do not apply to field corn or to field corn grown for seed after silking. Do not exceed 16 fl oz/a per season. Do not harvest for forage within 30 days of application.
Dithane DF Rainshield
dithiocarbamate M3 1.5 lb Common rust, Helminthosporium leaf blight. Treat when symp-toms first appear. Depending on disease severity, repeat applica-tions on a 4- to 14-day schedule. —Do not apply within 40 days of harvest. See label for seasonal rate limitations.
Dithane F-45 Rainshield
dithiocarbamate M3 1.2 qt Common rust, Helminthosporium leaf blight. Treat when symp-toms first appear. Depending on disease severity, repeat applica-tions on a 4- to 14-day schedule. —Do not apply within 40 days of harvest. See label for seasonal rate limitations.
Dithane M45 dithiocarbamate M3 1.5 lb Common rust, Helminthosporium leaf blight. Treat when symp-toms first appear. Depending on disease severity, repeat applica-tions on a 4- to 14-day schedule. —Do not apply within 40 days of harvest. See label for seasonal rate limitations.
Headline pyraclostrobin 11 6–12 fl oz Common rust, gray leaf spot, anthracnose, northern corn leaf blight, southern rust, northern corn leaf spot, Physoderma brown spot, southern corn leaf blight, and yellow leaf blight. Apply prior to disease development and continue on a 7- to 14-day interval if conditions are conducive for disease develop-ment. Use the higher rate and shorter interval when disease pres-sure is high. —Do not apply within 7 days of harvest. Do not apply more than 72 oz/a per season. Do not make more than two sequential appli-cations before alternating to a labeled non-Group 11 fungicide with a different mode of action.
Headline AMP pyraclostrobin + metconazole
3,11 10–14.4 fl oz Anthracnose, eyespot, gray leaf spot, northern corn leaf blight, northern corn leaf spot, Physoderma brown spot, rust, southern corn leaf blight, yellow leaf blight. Begin applications prior to disease development and continue on a 7- to 14-day schedule if conditions for disease development persist. Use higher rate and shorter interval when disease pressure is high. Do not make more than two sequential applications before alternating to another fungicide with a different mode of action. Do not apply within 20 days of harvest for field corn grain and stover or 7 days for field corn forage/silage.
Manzate ProStick dithiocarbamate M3 1.5 lb Common rust, gray leaf spot, Helminthosporium leaf blight. Treat when symptoms first appear, repeat at 4- to 7-day intervals. —Do not exceed 15 lb or 12 qt/a per season. Do not feed treated forage to livestock. Do not apply within 40 days of harvest.
Fungicide group numbers indicate the modes of action; multiple applications of fungicides with the same group number increases the chances for disease resistance.
STORED GRAIN INSECTS PERENNIAL WEEDS
SMALL GRAINSAPPENDIX
FORAGES & PASTURES
SOYBEANCORN
PRINCIPLES OF PEST MGMT
XML Case Study: InDesign Tagging to HTML Navigation
IDEAlliance XML Case Study 14 June 2011
Case Study:
Agriculture Research – Pest Management DirectoryProcess:
• designer to tag the content based on type styles without understanding too much code
• export XML and transform with XSLT
• create navigable mobile HTML view
IND > XML > XSL > HTML
XML Case Study: InDesign Tagging to HTML Navigation
IDEAlliance XML Case Study 14 June 2011
Case Study: Agriculture Research – Pest Management Directory
Graphic designer reverse-engineers XML from layout file.
Typical InDesign print layout with type styles, no tags.
XML Case Study: InDesign Tagging to HTML Navigation
IDEAlliance XML Case Study 14 June 2011
Case Study: Agriculture Research – Pest Management Directory
Placeholder paragraph styles (with no formatting attributes) matching the table headers are created.
Easy to select columns and apply to the table text.
XML Case Study: InDesign Tagging to HTML Navigation
IDEAlliance XML Case Study 14 June 2011
Case Study: Agriculture Research – Pest Management Directory
Tags created to match type styles, and mapped styles to tags.
Table converted to paragraph-delimited text.
XML Case Study: InDesign Tagging to HTML Navigation
IDEAlliance XML Case Study 14 June 2011
Case Study: Agriculture Research – Pest Management Directory
Export tagged text from InDesign as XML.
Minor manual cleanup of tags, to be scripted later.
/* Replace > with >\r to add line breaks*/
/* Replace <chem> with \r\r<chem> to add line breaks*/
/* wrap each unit with chem */
/* add storyname at top and chemlist as total wrapper*/
XML Case Study: InDesign Tagging to HTML Navigation
IDEAlliance XML Case Study 14 June 2011
Case Study: Agriculture Research – Pest Management Directory
Use XSL to reshuffle and format the XML.
(shown in oXygen XML)
Iterate through the tags, populate the text lead-ins from the column headers for each entry.
XML Case Study: InDesign Tagging to HTML Navigation
IDEAlliance XML Case Study 14 June 2011
Case Study: Agriculture Research – Pest Management Directory
XSLT transform converts the XML to HTML
flexible enough to handle various tag structures from different sections
XML Case Study: InDesign Tagging to HTML Navigation
IDEAlliance XML Case Study 14 June 2011
Case Study: Agriculture Research – Pest Management Directory
CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) formats the HTML tags
JavaScript adds collapsible navigation
XML Case Study: InDesign Tagging to HTML Navigation
IDEAlliance XML Case Study 14 June 2011
Case Study: Agriculture Research – Pest Management Directory
multi-level HTML navigation of text lists
XML Case Study: InDesign Tagging to HTML Navigation
IDEAlliance XML Case Study 14 June 2011
Case Study: Agriculture Research – Pest Management Directory
Benefits:• Quick access to information
• Easy to navigate
• Portable to site
Drawbacks:• Static HTML view,
not able to actively compare
• Not live data, but daily updates available
Risks:• Summary info is not complete
• Need to reference complete technical data for chemicals usage
XML Case Study: InDesign Tagging to HTML Navigation
IDEAlliance XML Case Study 14 June 2011
Cathy PalmerSenior Applications InstructorNew Horizons of Wisconsin
Consulting & Training for InDesign/XML
Thank You!