Improving Graduate Education in Developing Countries Jamil Salmi Dublin, 5-7 March 2008.

Post on 19-Jan-2016

212 views 0 download

Tags:

transcript

Improving Graduate Education in Developing Countries

Jamil Salmi

Dublin, 5-7 March 2008

2

natural lab experiment:

U. of Malaya vs. NUS

• early 1960s: 2 branches of University of Malaya

• today:

• NUS ranked # 19

• UM only # 192

3

outline of the presentation

• excellence in graduate education

• challenges for developing countries

• a new education paradigm

4

defining excellence

• self-declaration

6

defining excellence

• self-declaration

• reputation

• rankings

7

results and performance

• top graduates

• leading edge research

• vigorous technology transfer

8

critical dimensions

• concentration of talent

• abundant resources

• favorable governance

AutonomyAcademic Freedom

StudentsTeaching StaffResearchers

Research Output

Technology Transfer

Concentration of Talent

Abundant

ResourcesFavorable Governance

Leadership TeamStrategic VisionCulture of Excellence

Public Budget Resources

Endowment Revenues

Tuition Fees

Research Grants

Excellence Supportive Regulatory Framework

Graduates

Excellence in Graduate EducationAlignment of Key Factors

Source: Elaborated by Jamil Salmi

10

U. Of Malaya vs. NUS

– talent

• UM: selection bias in favor of Bumiputras, less than 5% foreign students, no foreign professors

• NUS: highly selective, 43% of graduates students are foreign, many foreign professors

11

U. Of Malaya vs. NUS (II)

– finance

• UM: $118 million, $4,053 per student

• NUS: $750 million endowment, $205 million, $6,300 per student

– governance

• UM: restricted by government regulations and control, unable to hire top foreign professors

• NUS: status of a private corporation, able to attract world-class researchers (incl. Malaysians)

12

outline of the presentation

• excellence in graduate education

• challenges for developing countries

13

the challenges

• governance

14

the challenges

• governance

• brain drain

• resources

15

US InstitutionsEndowments

Assets(2006 million $)

UK InstitutionsEndowment

Assets(2002 million $)

Harvard University 28,916 Cambridge 4,000

Yale University 18,031 Oxford 4,000

Stanford University 14,085 Edinburgh 3200

University of Texas 13,235 Glasgow 240

Princeton University 13,045 King’s 200

Comparison of US and UK Endowment Levels

16

17

the challenges

• governance

• brain drain

• resources

• digital divide

18

the digital divide(i) Distribution of Internet Hosts

Developing Countries (5.9%)

Australia, Japan & New Zealand

(6.4%)

Europe 22.4%

Canada & United States

(65.3%)

(ii) Distribution of World Population

Canada & United States (5.1%)

Europe (12.0%)

Australia, Japan & New Zealand

(2.5%)

Developing Countries (80.4%)

19

connectivity in Africa

• same bandwidth as an average household in the US

• 100 times as expensive as what an average US university pays

20

the way forward

• national priority

• vision and strategic planning

• strategic deployment of resources

21

22

the way forward

• national priority

• vision and strategic planning

• strategic deployment of resources

• internationalization (regional cooperation, diaspora)

23

internationalization

• language

• mobility– faculty– students– leaders

• joint / double degrees

• supportive technology– distance education– remote research

24

outline of the presentation

• excellence in graduate education

• challenges for developing countries

• a new education paradigm

25

new education paradigm

• learning by doing

26

27

other intriguing experiences

• Laurea University of Applied Science (Finland)

• Alverno College (USA)

• LimKokWing University of Creative Technology (Malaysia)

28

Giorgio Armani-Samsung mobile

29

new education paradigm

• learning by doing

• creativity

30

creativity

• invent

• experiment

• think out of the box

• take chances

• break the rules

• make mistakes

• and have fun…

31

new education paradigm

• learning by doing

• creativity

• e-learning / blended learning

34

new education paradigm

• learning by doing

• creativity

• e-learning / blended learning

• open education resources

35

MIT’s Open CourseWare

36

Chinese open resources for education

37

virtual learning communities

38

new education paradigm

• learning by doing

• creativity

• e-learning / blended learning

• open education resources

• regional / local engagement

39

resolution of local problems

41

Clemson University

• land grant university focused on agricultural and mechanical crafts

• changing region

• strategic partnership with BMW to become premier automotive and sports car research U

• aims to become # 20

42

conclusion

43

conclusion

alignment

time dimension

adaptation of doctoral programs to new education paradigm• integration of research and undergraduate

studies• interactive pedagogical approaches• e-learning