Post on 24-Nov-2015
description
transcript
RUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTDISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
j [ u d d e t c mM
u O
nem oO RUNSVSS IqbnPkklJ
t d[ n RUM SQRU
s lM
qM
O
h xO tM c nO kM k bO kM t eO uM b nO nM s tO bM d eM n fO nM e xO sM k hO tM e nO cM kOM i e dM l mO tM
eM
NN
u dM
o eO
m d oO RUNNQQSQT IqbnPkklJ
I RUNNQQSWR IqbnPkklJM RUNNQQSWW IqbnPkklJM RUNNQQVVR IqbnPkklJJ
DEFENDANTS CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT PURSUANT TOPRETRIAL ORDER NUMBER ONE
q q p oO RM e u d IuJM
u cM jOM u d tM jO M u d nM
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ E c] FJ
SuOMR h xO tM c nO kM k bO kM t eO
uM b nO nM s tO bM d eM n fO nM e
xO sM k hO tM e nO cM kOM i e dM l mO
t I j e M uM u cM jOM
u d tM jO M u d nM uOM
b d t IbdtJM eJS
[T
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE CASE
A. Overview of the Data Breach Litigation
p e RZM SQRTM u
u I e cJM
u vOtO
o SX e RVM SQRTO u M I
dJ u
R u u O S uM u cM jOM u d tM jO M u d nM uO nem oO RUNSVSS g c e mmq n G g mmqO g c e u j e t dO bdt c G nM qObO T p b TQM SQRUM d c d q p oORO d d d O q O
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ F c] FJ
T e cO b d q p oO RM
d [
I d dJM
I c dJM
dO oO RUNSQT I t dJO b
n XM SQRUM YR d dM SY c dM U t d
dOU
B. The Consumer Cases
1. Plaintiffs Allegations5
q YR d dM TY
M u
u o SX e RV O u
d d u
e c u
O
o YR d d
RQQ O u
[
U b d q p oO RM Schafer d d c dO g M Schafer d dO V u YR d dO
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ G c] FJ
U" t IZ JM
IRQ JM IRR
JM IW JM
IS JM IR
JM IS JM IZ JM
IR JM IST JM
IRR JM IX
JM IT J\
" t
IT JM
IvebqJ ISW J\
" g e k bM g
d s bM g e q bM g t d
bO
q VQ d d
O u d d q
M u
M SX O u d d q IJ
\ IJ
\ IJ \ IJ \ IJ
\ IJ \ IJ M M
O
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ H c] FJ
V2. Targets Defenses
u u
O u
O
The Consumer Case plaintiffs lack standing. u d d
e cO t
b jjj O Clapper v. Amnesty International USAM RTT tO dO
RRTYM RRUX ISQRTJ I
certainly impending M possible
OJ I J\ see also Polanco v. Omnicell,
Inc.M oO RTNRURX IomiPlnxJM SQRT xm WYSTSWVM IeOoOkO eO SWM SQRTJ I
ClapperJ\ In re Barnes & Noble Pin Pad Litig.M oO RSNN
YWRXM SQRT xm UXVZVYY IoOeO jO tO TM SQRTJ IJO p d d
O c
O ClapperM RTT tOdO RRVRO nM u
u
vOtO O u M
M I JM
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ I c] FJ
W g s bO
The allegations fail to state claims. u d d
RQQ M s
RSIJIWJO u M
O gM
e c
OW tM
vebq M
O See In re Sony Gaming Networks and Customer Data
Security Breach Litig. SQRU xm SSTWXX KTVNUR ISonyJ ItOeO dO kO SRM SQRUJ
I gM nM o zM u vebq
JO uM
g d s b IgdsbJM M M
O See id. KVU I gdsb J\ id. ZXU I
J\ In re Zappos.com, Inc.M Customer Data Security Breach Litig.M SQRT
xm UYTQUZXM KTNU IeO oO tO ZM SQRTJ IZapposJ I
JO
Plaintiffs will be unable to certify a classO b M
W f M u M O
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ J c] FJ
Xd d O b M
NN X
M see Mazza v. Am. Honda Motor CoOM WWW gOT VYRM VZW IZ dO SQRSJ I
JM
M M M
u O See, e.g.M HannafordM SZT gOsOeO SR IeO n
nO SQM SQRTJ I
J\ In re TJX Companies Retail Sec. Breach Litig.M SUW
gOsOeO TYZM TZS IeO nO oO SZM SQQXJ ITJXJ I
JO
j
s STIJISJ t
d Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesM RTR tO dO
X b M d d O iM M see, e.g.M In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig.M SQRUvOtO eO mfyjt XTVTM KXV ItOeO dO kO SRM SQRUJM NN O f d M b jjj O See, e.g.M In re Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Implants Products Liab. Litig.MZX gOT RQVQM RQVV IY dO RZZWJ Ix M OJ\ In reMedtronic, Inc., Implantable Defibrillators Litig.M UWV gO tO S YYWM YZS IeO nO SQQWJO x M M d M NN O See In re TMJ ImplantsProducts Liab. Litig.M ZX gOT RQVVO
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ K c] FJ
YSVURM SVVR ISQRRJO
3. Affiliated Computer Services[Related to Reynoso v. Target and Affiliated Computer Services,Inc., No. 14-cv-346 (D. Minn.)]
bdt O u
Reynoso d d uM supraM
bdt j
M fqqjd nd IfqqjdJO u j
bdt j d g e
c q b oO
bdt M M M
M
M O
bdt u e supraO j M
bdt O
4. Procedural Status
Status of DiscoveryO o d d
N o
e j O u M
k hO j
Pietanza M f e o zM k d
b RYM SQRUO
u Pietanza k d
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ L c] FJ
Z e nM
O o u Pietanza
M q p oO RM O j
M d d
MY M
O
Other Motion Practice. d d o
e j u
IJ\ IJ\
IJ\
IJ\ M
Damasco v. Clearwire Corp.M WWS gOT YZR IX dO SQRRJOZ u
Rippy t e j
d d dM dM jM
O
Parties Opposing Transfer to this DistrictO p b UM SQRUM k q
Y q Due Fratelli d d d dM jM e SXM SQRTM o e jO u M M k WM SQRUO k h o e j O Z q u N O
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ M c] FJ
RQ
n m IkqnmJ d u p IdupNRJ
d c dM
O w jO
nd jOM N M Christensen v. Target Corp.M oO
RT"QRRTW IeO vJM O w nd
kqnm b STM SQRUM
e v M M kqnm
d u p Christensen e
vO s n RVM SQRUO
5. Related State-Court Litigation
b M
O
6. Predictions as to the Total Number of Cases
u YR d dO d d
O j M M
O c M VNRQ
d d O
C. The Bank Cases
1. Plaintiffs Allegations
q c d
e cO u
c d
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ ED c] FJ
RR
IJ
\ IJ
N
\ IJ N
O u
M M c d O
o SX c d TQ
O u [
" t IR JM
IT JM IU
JM IR JM IY JM IU
JM IU JM
IR JM IR J\
" t vebq IX
J\
" g hNmNc b
s j d p IsjdpJ bO
q ST c d
O u c d
O u c d
IJ \ IJ
\ IJ M M \ IJ
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ EE c] FJ
RS
sjdp b\ IJ
\ IJ \ IJ \ IJ
M M O
2. Targets Defenses
u u
O u
O
The allegations fail to state claims. m d d M
c d O b TJX
M c d
O See TJXM VSU gO tO S YTM YY IeO nO SQQXJO d
M
O See Sovereign Bank v. BJs Wholesale Club, IncOM VTT gOT RWSM RXZ
IT dO SQQXJ I J\ TJXM
VSU gO tO S ZR I JO
Plaintiffs will be unable to certify a classO b TJX M c d
I J O b
TJXM |~
M
O TJXM SUW gOsOeO TZSO u TJX
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ EF c] FJ
RT
|~ |~
N \
O h
O O O O O
O O jM NNM NNM
O Id. TZWNZXO w
c d
DukesM RTR tO dO SVVRO m d dM c d
O See MazzaM WWW gOT VZWO
3. Procedural Status
o c dO
4. Related State-Court Litigation
u
O
5. Predictions as to the Total Number of Cases
u SY c dO u c d
O c M VNRQ c d O
D. The Shareholder Cases
1. Plaintiffs Allegations
g u
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ EG c] FJ
RU
uO e IJ j e
Iu RS M RR M u d
g pM u d j pJ\ IJ uM
eO
u t d j e
uM e cM u
e c u O t d
j e uO
t d j e
M M M O
t d IJ M IJ
u M IJ
u j e M IJ
M M O
2. Individual Defendants Defenses
u e
O e
O
The actions should be dismissed due to Plaintiffs failure to make pre-suit
demand. c I J uM t d
u M
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ EH c] FJ
RV
O See gO sO dO qO STORO
t d
n I u n
JO See Winter v. Farmers Educ. & Co-operative Union, RQX oOxOS SSWM STU
InO RZWRJ I
JO t d M
O j M
u RS M
n c d b IncdbJ
O nO tO TQSbOSURM O RO
c M
N O
The director defendants are shielded from liability by Targets Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation. d ncdbM u b
s b j |~ O O O
|u~ M
M
O See bO jw
nO tO TQSbOSVRM O UO b t d
M M b jwO uM
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ EI c] FJ
RW
O
The allegations fail to state claims. u j e
M
u M
O See nO tO TQSbOSVRM O RO o
t d I t d
M J
j e O p
j e e c
O
3. Procedural Status
b t dM
O o O
4. Related State-Court Litigation
u i
d e dM Beth Koeneke v. Roxanne S. Austin, et al., oO SXNN
RUNRYTS Ik m kO nM JO u Koeneke
M M M
t dO p b RRM SQRUM Koeneke
t d dM M
Koeneke O u e k RSM
SQRUO q n M
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ EJ c] FJ
RX
ZQ O e
Koeneke n
O
5. Predictions as to the Total Number of Cases
j u N
dM i d e dO iM
M
M O u
c e c O
u t dO
II. LEAD AND LIAISON COUNSEL
A. Defendants Views as to Appropriate Lead and Liaison Counsel
e
d d c dO q t d
m d m d O e
t d O
e d m d m
d
O u M e
RU d m d m d
nemM M
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ EK c] FJ
RY
nem d O
B. Guidelines Concerning Plaintiffs Counsel Timekeeping
d M e
O u
O u
dO
j
M see, e.g.M In re HardiePlank Fiber Cement Siding
Litig.M nem g oO RSNNQSTVZNnkeNmjc IeO nO pO TM SQRSJ IeM kOJ\
hM fdg oO URXM In Re Idevice Address Book Litig.M oO T[RTNNQQUVTNktu
IoOeO dO oO SSM SQRTJM nem O See d
n p oO RM fdg oO SRM In re Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. Data
Security Breach LitigOM oO iNQZNneNQSQUW ItOeO uO bO SYM SQQZJ\ g
q pM fdg oO SSM In re Hannaford Bros. Co. Customer Data Security
Breach LitigationM oO S[QYNneNRZVU IeO nO k SVM SQQYJO jM e
In re
HardiePlank nem eO u
d d
dO Iq p oO RM fdg oO U VOJ
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ EL c] FJ
RZ
III. PLEADINGS
A. Service Status
Consumer Cases. q u I u
J d d except [ Alvarez v. TargetM
oO RUNdwNRSZ IoOeO dOJ\ Bess v. TargetM oO RUNdwNSWS IeO tOdOJ\ Crawford v.
TargetM oO RUNdwNSQXR IxOeO uOJ\ Ellison v. TargetM oO RUNdwNSQZ IfOeO qOJ\
Guzman v. TargetM oO RTNdwNVZVT IoOeO dOJ\ Kirschenstein v. TargetM oO RUNdwN
RUVQ IdOeO dOJ\ Klein v. TargetM oO RTNdwNRZXU IdOeO dOJ\ Marciniszyn v. TargetM
oO RUNdwNRRT IeO d\ dO t dJ\ Switzer v. TargetM
oO RTNdwNRTRZ ItOeO jOJO
q Reynoso v. Target and Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.M oO RUNN
TUW IeO nOJ b d tO
Bank Cases. q u I u
J c d except [ Animas Credit Union v.
TargetM oO RUNdwNSZS IeO oOnOJ\ Commercial Bancshares, Inc. v. TargetM oO RUNdwN
UQRS IxOeO bOJ\ First NBC Bank v. TargetM oO RUNdwNRQRS IfOeO mOJ\ North
Districts Community Credit Union v. TargetM oO RUNdwNRXV IxOeO qOJO
Shareholder Cases. b t
dO
B. Waiver of Service
u
M e d M
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ EM c] FJ
SQ
gO sO dO qO UIJO u
eO
C. Consolidated Complaints
j M
O
h
dM M
d dMRQ c dM t
dORR q TQ
d d d m d dM cM
t d m dO
D. Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond
e
UV d dO
IV. PROPOSED MOTION SCHEDULE
A. Motions to Dismiss
e
RQ u Schafer d d Schafer c d O RR u t d O See t s d s bM b m dM s jM fdg oO TS RUM Kulla v. TargetCorp. et al.M oO RUNNQQSQTNqbnNkkl IbO TM SQRUJO
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ FD c] FJ
SR
[
" q
TQ O
" e SR
O
q M
d
O
j M
TQ
O
B. Motions to Amend the Pleadings or Add Parties
b d
d WQ e
d dO b
c d WQ u
c dO b
t d WQ
t d
C. Other Motions
u N
s SWIJ t wOd
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ FE c] FJ
SS
O
V. DISCOVERY
A. Discovery Coordination
j M
d dM c dM t dO
d d m d dM cM t d m
d
O
B. Discovery Stayed until Resolution of Motions to Dismiss
b N
d O
C. Parties to Confer Regarding Discovery Following Resolution ofMotions to Dismiss
q s SWIJ
RU
d s RW
O
j d c d
d O b M
d d e q n
e qO e d d e q
u I
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ FF c] FJ
ST
d dJ O
e n e q
d
O b
n e qO u s SWIJ
M O
D. E-Discovery
1. Preservation of Electronically Stored Information
x TQ d d m d
dM cM t d m dM
IftjJ O h
M [ IRJ
ftj \ ISJ
ftj \ ITJ ftj
O u
O
j ftj M
gO sO dO qO SWIJISJIdJ SWIJIRJIcJIJO u
M M O
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ FG c] FJ
SU
2. Meet and Confer Regarding Document Search and ProductionFormats
b s SWIJ t wOdM
M
M ftj ftj
M IJ ftjO b ftj
O u
O
3. Document Production and Repositories
e d d m d I
J O
q M M
d d m
dO
VI. COORDINATION WITH STATE COURT LITIGATION
u O
u d
O u
Koeneke i
d e dO
VII. SETTLEMENT
q kqnm M M M
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ FH c] FJ
SV
u O u
kqnm
nem
O u
u
O
VIII. TRIAL DATES.
j
IJ d eO
e[ n XM SQRU Px kO x x kO xM no DRRXQVV n bO qM no DSQTZUU gbfhsf cblfs ebojfmt mmqSSQQ x g d ZQ t t t nM no VVUQS IWRSJ XWWNXQQQ
IWRSJ XWWNRWQQOagceO OagceO
Local Counsel for Defendants TargetCorporation, Target Brands, Inc., TargetCorporate Services, Inc., TargetCorporation of Minnesota, and Target.comin MDL No. 14-2522; Counsel forDefendants in Consolidated ProceedingNo. 14-cv-203.
e[ n XM SQRU Ps l i kO nfM db DWWXYRK k xO mM db DYVXXWK n kO bM db DRVUYRQK s lM db DSRTSSSK
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ FI c] FJ
SW
npssjtpo G gpfstufs mmq
USV n t t gM d ZURQVNSUYS IURVJ SWYNXQQQ
IURVJ SWYNXVSSinfaO kmaO nbaO slaO
e gO neM db DRSVYQWK npssjtpo G gpfstufs mmqXQX x c m bM d ZQQRXNTVUT ISRTJ YZSNVSQQ
ISRTJ YZSNVUVUeneaO
K b pro hac vice q p oO R
Counsel for Defendants TargetCorporation, Target Brands, Inc., TargetCorporate Services, Inc. , TargetCorporation of Minnesota, and Target.comin MDL No. 14-2522.
e[ n XM SQRU Pc qO c c qO cM DSQZXYY k s nM DTYXTTQ cfsfot G njmmfsM qObO
YQ t f tM t TXSQ nM no VVUQS IWRSJ TUZNWRXR
IWRSJ TUZNWURW IgJ aO aO
Attorneys for Defendant AffiliatedComputer Services, Inc.
NTUQWWWU
POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ FJ c] FJ
Bank Cases