Post on 28-Nov-2014
description
transcript
Interaction in Mass EducationMartin Ebner
http://www.facebook.com/martin.ebner
http://www.martinebner.at
https://twitter.com/#!/mebner
http://elearningblog.tugraz.at
Interaction with a mass of students
• Feedback Lag
• Student Apprehension
• Single Speaker Paradigm
Before we start …
… we do a live test …
Audience Response Systems (ARS)
Digital Frontchannel Digital Backchannel
qualitative quantitative qualitative quantitative
Voting system with
any text
Voting system with
multiple choice
Feedback system with
any text
Feedback system with
defined options
Architecture of the systems
Real-life experiences
... Anwendung in der Google-Glass-Brille ....
Backchannel
... Anwendung in der Google-Glass-Brille ....
!30$
!20$
!10$
0$
10$
20$
30$
40$
50$
0$ 2$ 4$ 6$ 8$ 10$ 12$ 14$ 16$ 18$ 20$ 22$ 24$ 26$ 28$ 30$ 32$ 34$ 36$ 38$ 40$
value&[%]&
*me&[minutes]&
Different&Aging&Approaches&
speed$(no$aging)$ speed$(linear$aging)$ speed$(quadra:c$aging)$
Backchannel
Backchannel
• Students love it
• Easy to use, fast and impressive feedback
• Hard to follow for the teacher (second screen)
• Problem of appropriate reaction
Realfeedback
Realfeedback
• … before the lecture starts (repetition) !
• … during the lecture (assessment)
• … during the lecture (for discussions in groups)
• … to discuss homework
Teacher are using it …
Realfeedback
• Students attention is very high
• Easy to use and great overview
• Questions must be prepared beforehand
• It needs time
Conclusion
• ARS system are interesting option to enhance interaction in huge lecture halls
• Use of ARS system need a solid didactical concept
• Use of ARS system is a challenging task for lecturers
... our next approach ....
Graz University of Technology
SOCIAL LEARNINGComputer and Information Services
Graz University of Technology
Martin Ebner
http://elearning.tugraz.atmartin.ebner@tugraz.at
Slides available at: http://elearningblog.tugraz.at
mebner