Post on 24-May-2020
transcript
IOTA CAROLCOMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
December 28, 2015Revised January 29, 2016Revised February 23, 2016
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTTRAFFIC ANALYSIS
Iota CarolPALM BEACH COUNTY, FL
Prepared for:Iota Carol, LLC
Prepared by:Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.West Palm Beach, Florida
140190000December 28, 2015January 29, 2016February 23, 2016CA 00000696Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.Suite 2001920 Wekiva WayWest Palm Beach, Florida 33411561/845-0665 TEL
_________________________________Christopher W. Heggen, P.E.Florida Registration Number 58636
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc Page | i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................1
SHORT-TERM (YEAR 2020) ANALYSIS ....................................................................................4
Trip Generation .......................................................................................................................4
Traffic Distribution and Assignment .........................................................................................5
Radius of Development Influence ............................................................................................5
Test 2 (5-Year Buildout) Level of Service Analysis ..................................................................7
LONG-TERM (YEAR 2040) ANALYSIS ....................................................................................13
Trip Generation .....................................................................................................................13
Traffic Distribution and Assignment .......................................................................................14
Radius of Development Influence ..........................................................................................15
Long-Range Level of Service Analysis ..................................................................................17
CONCLUSION ..........................................................................................................................19
APPENDIX A: PCN SHEETS
APPENDIX B: TPS OUTPUT WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX C: INTERNAL CAPTURE WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX D: YEAR 2040 MPO MODEL VOLUME OUTPUT DATA
APPENDIX E: DATA FROM OTHER APPROVED / PENDING PROJECTS (MINTO WEST,
AVENIR, INDIAN TRAILS GROVE)
APPENDIX F: PALM BEACH COUNTY FIVE-YEAR ROAD PROGRAM
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc Page | ii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Maximum Development Intensities Summary ................................................................2
Table 2: Trip Generation Potential: 5-Year Horizon .....................................................................4
Table 3A: Test 2 (Year 2020) Significance Analysis: AM Peak Hour ...........................................9
Table 3B: Test 2 (Year 2020) Significance Analysis: PM Peak Hour .........................................10
Table 4: Test 2 (Year 2020) LOS Analysis ............................................................................... 12
Table 5: Trip Generation Potential: Long-Term Horizon ............................................................14
Table 6: Long-Term (Year 2040) LOS Analysis ........................................................................18
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Site Location ................................................................................................................3
Figure 2: Short-Term (Year 2020) Project Trip Distribution..........................................................6
Figure 3: Long-Term (Year 2040) Project Trip Distribution ........................................................16
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc | Page 1
INTRODUCTION
Kimley-Horn has prepared a future land use plan amendment traffic analysis for the Iota Carol
site located north of 60th Street west of 190th Street in unincorporated Palm Beach County,
Florida. Figure 1 illustrates the location of the project site. Iota Carol is made up of three
parcels, which currently have the Future Land Use (FLU) designation of RR-10. This application
is being filed to amend the Future Land Use plan to adopt a designation of RR-1.25 for the
project site. The Parcel Control Numbers (PCNs) for the site are listed below:
· 00-40-42-33-00-000-1010
· 00-40-42-28-00-000-9000
· 00-40-42-33-00-000-3010
Based on the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan, the RR-10 designation allows a
maximum density of 1 residential unit per 10 acres. The RR-1.25 designation would allow a
maximum density of 1 residential units per 1.25 acres. In addition, commercial and civic
development are proposed for the site.
Table 1 summarizes the maximum development intensities assumed for the parcel based upon
the existing and proposed FLU designations.
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc | Page 2
Table 1Maximum Development Intensities
Scenario Acreage Maximum Intensity Maximum DevelopmentPotential
Existing FLU
RR-10 1,287.95 acres 1 unit / 10 acres 129 D.U.
Proposed FLU
RR-1.25 1,287.95 acres 1 unit /1.25 acres 1,030 D.U.
Commercial 112,000 S.F.
Civic 112,123 S.F.
This report summarizes the findings of the analysis that was conducted for the short-term and
long-term planning horizons based upon the criteria identified in Policy 3.5d of the Future Land
Use Element of the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan.
LEGEND
SITE
FIGURE 1SITE LOCATION
IOTA CAROL140190000
SITE
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc | Page 4
SHORT-TERM (YEAR 2020) ANALYSIS
A short term analysis was conducted to evaluate anticipated conditions in Year 2020. Because
full buildout of the project will take longer than this five-year planning horizon, this analysis
includes an evaluation of the impacts of development of 500 dwelling units (or the trip equivalent
thereof) for the site. This analysis has been conducted using the methodology for the Test 2
Level of Service Analyses as defined in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Unified Land
Development Code.
Trip GenerationThe trip generation calculations are based on the trip generation rates published by Palm Beach
County. Because the site is currently agricultural use, no credit for existing site traffic was
assumed in this analysis. For the future (five-year planning horizon) analysis, a development
potential of 500 dwelling units was assumed.
As indicated in Table 2, the 5-year maximum development potential under the proposed FLU for
this parcel is 5,000 new external daily trips, 375 new external AM peak-hour trips (94 in/281 out)
and 447 new external PM peak-hour trips (282 in/165 out).
Table 2Trip Generation Potential – Five-Year Horizon (Year 2020)
Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak HourTrips Total In Out Total In Out
Proposed FLU Designation - 5 Year HorizonGross Trips
Single Family Detached 500 DU 5,000 375 94 281 447 282 165
Net New External Trips:5-Year Horizon 5,000 375 94 281 447 282 165Trip generation was calculated using the following data:
Daily Trip GenerationSingle Family detached PBC =
AM Peak Hour Trip GenerationSingle Family detached PBC =
PM Peak Hour Trip GenerationSingle Family detached PBC =
T = .75 * Units (25% in / 75% out)
Ln(T) = .90 * Ln(Units)+.51 (63% in / 37% out)
Land Use Intensity
T = 10 * Units
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc | Page 5
Traffic Distribution and Assignment
Traffic distribution is the pairing of trip ends from the subject site with other land uses in the
area. These trips were assigned to the surrounding roadways based upon a review of the
roadway network proposed to be in place at the time of buildout and its travel time
characteristics.
The peak-hour trips for the project were then assigned to the surrounding roadway network
proposed to be in place for the 2020 analysis year. This assignment differs from the ultimate
long-range assignment, which accounts for future roadway connections to be built. Figure 2
illustrates the project traffic assignment to the surrounding roadway network for the short-term
(Year 2020) analysis.
Radius of Development InfluenceBased upon the thresholds published in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County ULDC, the radius
of development influence for the peak hour volume of project traffic anticipated to be generated
in the 5-year planning horizon timeframe (447 trips) is two miles.
LEGENDSITE
ROAD NETWORK
PERCENT ASSIGNMENT
SITE
FIGURE 2FUTURE (2020) PROJECT DISTRIBUTION
IOTA CAROL140190000
25% 30%
25%5%
30%
70%
35%
30%
XX%
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc | Page 7
Test 2 (5-Year Buildout) Level of Service AnalysisSignificance was determined in accordance with the Test 2 (5-Year Analysis) LOS E peak-hour
peak-directional service volumes defined in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Unified Land
Development Code. The AM and PM peak hour project trips were assigned to the surrounding
roadway network within the study radius in order to evaluate the project’s impact in comparison
to the LOS E adopted service volume. As defined in Article 12, Chapter B, Section 2(B), “The
existing road network and State and County Five-Year Road Program improvements with
construction scheduled to commence before the end of the Five-Year Analysis Period shall be
the Test 2 Road Network assumed in the analysis.” Therefore, the following road improvements
identified in the current Palm Beach County Five-Year Road Program have been included in this
analysis:
· Northlake Boulevard, East of Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road to East of Hall
Boulevard: Widening to 4 lanes (Construction in FY 2017)
· Northlake Boulevard, East of Hall Boulevard to Coconut Boulevard: Widening to 4
lanes (Construction in FY 2019)
· Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road: Orange Boulevard to South of Northlake Boulevard:
Widening to 4/6 lanes (Construction in FY 2017)
Relevant excerpts from the Palm Beach County Five-Year Road Program have been included in
Appendix F.
Per Palm Beach County standards, roadway links inside the two-mile radius of development
influence are anticipated to be significantly impacted if project traffic is equal to or greater than
3% of the LOS E service volume, and links outside of that radius are anticipated to be
significantly impacted if project traffic is equal to or greater than 5% of the LOS E service
volume. As indicated in Tables 3A and 3B, the following roadway segments are significantly
impacted by the proposed FLU amendment for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively:
AM Peak Hour
· Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road, Northbound, between Okeechobee Boulevard and
Northlake Boulevard
· Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road, Southbound, between 60 th Street North and
Okeechobee Boulevard
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc | Page 8
· Okeechobee Boulevard, Eastbound, between Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road and F
Road
PM Peak Hour
· Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road, Northbound, between Southern Boulevard and 60 th
Street North
· Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road, Southbound, between Northlake Boulevard and
Okeechobee Boulevard
· Okeechobee Boulevard, Westbound, between F Road and Seminole Pratt-Whitney
Road
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc | Page 9
Table 3ATest 2 (Year 2020) Significance Analysis (AM Peak Hour)
Project Traffic WithinPercent 2Impact miles?
Seminole Pratt Whitney RoadNorthlake Boulevard Temple Boulevard NB 4LD Class I 1,960 0% 25% 70 3.57% Yes Yes
SB 4LD Class I 1,960 25% 0% 24 1.22% Yes NoTemple Boulevard Orange Boulevard NB 4LD Class I 1,960 0% 25% 70 3.57% Yes Yes
SB 4LD Class I 1,960 25% 0% 24 1.22% Yes NoOrange Boulevard 60th Street NB 4LD Class I 1,960 0% 30% 84 4.29% Yes Yes
SB 4LD Class I 1,960 30% 0% 28 1.43% Yes No60th Street Persimmon Boulevard NB 2L Class I 880 70% 0% 66 7.50% Yes Yes
SB 2L Class I 880 0% 70% 197 22.39% Yes YesPersimmon Boulevard Sycamore Drive NB 4LD Class I 1,960 70% 0% 66 3.37% Yes Yes
SB 4LD Class I 1,960 0% 70% 197 10.05% Yes YesSycamore Drive Okeechobee Boulevard NB 4LD Class I/Uninterrupted 2,700 70% 0% 66 2.44% Yes No
SB 4LD Class I/Uninterrupted 2,700 0% 70% 197 7.30% Yes YesOkeechobee Boulevard Southern Boulevard NB 4LD Class I 1,960 35% 0% 33 1.68% No No
SB 4LD Class I 1,960 0% 35% 98 5.00% No NoCoconut Boulevard
Northlake Boulevard Temple Boulevard NB 2L Class I 880 0% 10% 28 3.18% No NoSB 2L Class I 880 10% 0% 9 1.02% No No
Temple Boulevard Orange Boulevard NB 2L Class I 880 0% 10% 28 3.18% No NoSB 2L Class I 880 10% 0% 9 1.02% No No
Northlake BoulevardSeminole Pratt-Whitney Road 140th Avenue EB 4LD Class I 1960 0% 25% 70 3.57% No No
WB 4LD Class I 1960 25% 0% 24 1.22% No No140th Avenue Coconut Boulevard EB 4LD Class I 1960 0% 25% 70 3.57% No No
WB 4LD Class I 1960 25% 0% 24 1.22% No NoCoconut Boulevard Ibis Boulevard EB 4LD Class I 1960 0% 30% 84 4.29% No No
WB 4LD Class I 1960 30% 0% 28 1.43% No NoIbis Boulevard SR 7 EB 4LD Class I 1960 0% 30% 84 4.29% No No
WB 4LD Class I 1960 30% 0% 28 1.43% No NoSR 7 Beeline Highway EB 4LD Uninterrupted 3760 0% 30% 84 2.23% No No
WB 4LD Uninterrupted 3760 30% 0% 28 0.74% No NoOrange Boulevard
Seminole Pratt Whitney Road 140th avenue EB 2L Class I 880 0% 5% 14 1.59% Yes NoWB 2L Class I 880 5% 0% 5 0.57% Yes No
140th Avenue Coconut Boulevard EB 2L Class I 880 0% 5% 14 1.59% No NoWB 2L Class I 880 5% 0% 5 0.57% No No
Coconut Boulevard 60th Street EB 2L Class I 880 0% 5% 14 1.59% No NoWB 2L Class I 880 5% 0% 5 0.57% No No
Okeechobee BoulevardSeminole Pratt Whitney Road B Road EB 2L Uninterrupted 1,440 0% 30% 84 5.83% No Yes
WB 2L Uninterrupted 1,440 30% 0% 28 1.94% No NoB Road F Road EB 2L Uninterrupted 1,440 0% 30% 84 5.83% No Yes
WB 2L Uninterrupted 1,440 30% 0% 28 1.94% No No
AM PEAK HOUR
SignificantImpact ??
% Assignment PeakHourTrips
From
LOS EServiceVolume Inbound
RoadwayDirection Facility Classification
Year 2020Laneage
OutboundTo
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc | Page 10
Table 3BTest 2 (Year 2020) Significance Analysis (PM Peak Hour)
Project Traffic WithinPercent 2Impact miles?
Seminole Pratt Whitney RoadNorthlake Boulevard Temple Boulevard NB 4LD Class I 1,960 0% 25% 41 2.09% Yes No
SB 4LD Class I 1,960 25% 0% 71 3.62% Yes YesTemple Boulevard Orange Boulevard NB 4LD Class I 1,960 0% 25% 41 2.09% Yes No
SB 4LD Class I 1,960 25% 0% 71 3.62% Yes YesOrange Boulevard 60th Street NB 4LD Class I 1,960 0% 30% 50 2.55% Yes No
SB 4LD Class I 1,960 30% 0% 85 4.34% Yes Yes60th Street Persimmon Boulevard NB 2L Class I 880 70% 0% 197 22.39% Yes Yes
SB 2L Class I 880 0% 70% 116 13.18% Yes YesPersimmon Boulevard Sycamore Drive NB 4LD Class I 1,960 70% 0% 197 10.05% Yes Yes
SB 4LD Class I 1,960 0% 70% 116 5.92% Yes YesSycamore Drive Okeechobee Boulevard NB 4LD Class I/Uninterrupted 2,700 70% 0% 197 7.30% Yes Yes
SB 4LD Class I/Uninterrupted 2,700 0% 70% 116 4.30% Yes YesOkeechobee Boulevard Southern Boulevard NB 4LD Class I 1,960 35% 0% 99 5.05% No Yes
SB 4LD Class I 1,960 0% 35% 58 2.96% No NoCoconut Boulevard
Northlake Boulevard Temple Boulevard NB 2L Class I 880 0% 10% 17 1.93% No NoSB 2L Class I 880 10% 0% 28 3.18% No No
Temple Boulevard Orange Boulevard NB 2L Class I 880 0% 10% 17 1.93% No NoSB 2L Class I 880 10% 0% 28 3.18% No No
Northlake BoulevardSeminole Pratt-Whitney Road 140th Avenue EB 4LD Class I 1960 0% 25% 41 2.09% No No
WB 4LD Class I 1960 25% 0% 71 3.62% No No140th Avenue Coconut Boulevard EB 4LD Class I 1960 0% 25% 41 2.09% No No
WB 4LD Class I 1960 25% 0% 71 3.62% No NoCoconut Boulevard Ibis Boulevard EB 4LD Class I 1960 0% 30% 50 2.55% No No
WB 4LD Class I 1960 30% 0% 85 4.34% No NoIbis Boulevard SR 7 EB 4LD Class I 1960 0% 30% 50 2.55% No No
WB 4LD Class I 1960 30% 0% 85 4.34% No NoSR 7 Beeline Highway EB 4LD Uninterrupted 3760 0% 30% 50 1.33% No No
WB 4LD Uninterrupted 3760 30% 0% 85 2.26% No NoOrange Boulevard
Seminole Pratt Whitney Road 140th avenue EB 2L Class I 880 0% 5% 8 0.91% Yes NoWB 2L Class I 880 5% 0% 14 1.59% Yes No
140th Avenue Coconut Boulevard EB 2L Class I 880 0% 5% 8 0.91% No NoWB 2L Class I 880 5% 0% 14 1.59% No No
Coconut Boulevard 60th Street EB 2L Class I 880 0% 5% 8 0.91% No NoWB 2L Class I 880 5% 0% 14 1.59% No No
Okeechobee BoulevardSeminole Pratt Whitney Road B Road EB 2L Uninterrupted 1,440 0% 30% 50 3.47% No No
WB 2L Uninterrupted 1,440 30% 0% 85 5.90% No YesB Road F Road EB 2L Uninterrupted 1,440 0% 30% 50 3.47% No No
WB 2L Uninterrupted 1,440 30% 0% 85 5.90% No Yes
From To Inbound OutboundDirection
Year 2020Laneage
Facility ClassificationLOS E
ServiceVolume
SignificantImpact ??
% Assignment PeakHourTrips
PM PEAK HOUR
Roadway
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc | Page 11
Year 2020 capacity analyses were then performed on roadway segments that were determined
to be significantly impacted by project traffic. Background traffic was determined for all
significantly impacted roadways by applying the higher of either a 1 percent annual growth rate
plus committed development trips as indicated by the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance
Standards (TPS) database or the historical growth rate for the impacted segment, compounded
on an annual basis. In addition, traffic volumes from the Test 2 analysis for the currently
pending Indian Trails Grove application have been added to the background traffic calculation.
Project traffic was then added to determine future year 2020 volumes.
These total Year 2020 volumes were then compared to the LOS E generalized service volumes
for each significantly impacted roadway link. As indicated in Table 4, all significantly impacted
roadways operate acceptably at LOS E or better. Therefore, no further analysis is required and
the proposed change in the FLU meets the Test 2 requirements of the Palm Beach County
Traffic Performance Standards.
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc | Page 12
Tabl
e4
Test
2(Y
ear2
020)
LOS
Ana
lyse
s
2015
Indi
an20
2020
20Ye
ar20
20Pe
akCo
mm
itted
Trai
ls1%
Hist
oric
alHi
stor
ical
Back
grou
ndPr
ojec
tTo
tal
Lane
age
Hour
Deve
lopm
ent
Gro
veG
row
thG
row
thG
row
thVo
lum
ePe
akHo
urVo
lum
eVo
lum
eTr
affic
Rate
Trip
s
Sem
inol
ePr
attW
hitn
eyRo
adN
orth
lake
Boul
evar
dTe
mpl
eBo
ulev
ard
NB
4LD
Clas
sI1,
960
508
209
7026
4.59
%12
881
370
883
Yes
Tem
ple
Boul
evar
dO
rang
eBo
ulev
ard
NB
4LD
Clas
sI1,
960
508
209
7026
4.59
%12
881
370
883
Yes
Ora
nge
Boul
evar
d60
thSt
reet
NB
4LD
Clas
sI1,
960
664
384
8434
3.82
%13
711
6684
1,25
0Ye
s60
thSt
reet
Pers
imm
onBo
ulev
ard
NB
4LD
Clas
sII
1,87
085
646
366
442.
93%
133
1429
661,
495
Yes
SB4L
DCl
assI
I1,
870
793
387
197
402.
93%
123
1417
197
1,61
4Ye
sPe
rsim
mon
Boul
evar
dSy
cam
ore
Driv
eN
B4L
DCl
assI
1,96
085
646
366
442.
93%
133
1429
661,
495
Yes
SB4L
DCl
assI
1,96
079
338
719
740
2.93
%12
314
1719
71,
614
Yes
Syca
mor
eDr
ive
Oke
echo
bee
Boul
evar
dSB
4LD
Clas
sI/U
nint
erru
pted
2,70
095
137
019
749
1.00
%49
1567
197
1,76
4Ye
sO
keec
hobe
eBo
ulev
ard
Sem
inol
ePr
attW
hitn
eyRo
adB
Road
EB2L
Unin
terr
upte
d1,
440
530
132
8427
1.00
%27
773
8485
7Ye
sB
Road
FRo
adEB
2LUn
inte
rrup
ted
1,44
053
013
284
271.
00%
2777
384
857
Yes
Sem
inol
ePr
attW
hitn
eyRo
adN
orth
lake
Boul
evar
dTe
mpl
eBo
ulev
ard
SB4L
DCl
assI
1,96
052
726
470
274.
59%
133
888
7195
9Ye
sTe
mpl
eBo
ulev
ard
Ora
nge
Boul
evar
dSB
4LD
Clas
sI1,
960
527
264
7027
4.59
%13
388
871
959
Yes
Ora
nge
Boul
evar
d61
stSt
reet
SB4L
DCl
assI
1,96
066
547
485
343.
82%
137
1258
851,
343
Yes
60th
Stre
etPe
rsim
mon
Boul
evar
dN
B4L
DCl
assI
I1,
870
870
541
197
442.
93%
135
1652
197
1,84
9Ye
sSB
4LD
Clas
sII
1,87
062
697
011
632
2.93
%97
1744
116
1,86
0Ye
sPe
rsim
mon
Boul
evar
dSy
cam
ore
Driv
eN
B4L
DCl
assI
1,96
087
054
119
744
2.93
%13
516
5219
71,
849
Yes
SB4L
DCl
assI
1,96
062
697
011
632
2.93
%97
1744
116
1,86
0Ye
sSy
cam
ore
Driv
eO
keec
hobe
eBo
ulev
ard
NB
4LD
Clas
sI/U
nint
erru
pted
2,70
01,
035
540
197
531.
00%
5318
2519
72,
022
Yes
SB4L
DCl
assI
/Uni
nter
rupt
ed2,
700
545
903
116
281.
00%
2815
9211
61,
708
Yes
Oke
echo
bee
Boul
evar
dSo
uthe
rnBo
ulev
ard
NB
4LD
Clas
sI1,
960
840
494
9943
1.00
%43
1476
991,
575
Yes
Oke
echo
bee
Boul
evar
dSe
min
ole
Prat
tWhi
tney
Road
BRo
adW
B2L
Unin
terr
upte
d1,
440
528
167
8527
1.00
%27
807
8589
2Ye
sB
Road
FRo
adW
B2L
Unin
terr
upte
d1,
440
528
167
8527
1.00
%27
807
8589
2Ye
s
AMPE
AKHO
UR
PMPE
AKHO
UR
Belo
wLO
SE
Serv
ice
Volu
me?
From
To
Road
way
Dire
ctio
nFa
cilit
yCl
assi
ficat
ion
LOS
ESe
rvic
eVo
lum
e
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc | Page 13
LONG-TERM (YEAR 2040) ANALYSIS
A long-term analysis was conducted to evaluate anticipated conditions in Year 2040. This
analysis includes an evaluation of the impacts of the full development potential of the site. This
analysis has been conducted using the criteria defined in Policy 3.5-d of the Future Land Use
Element of the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan.
Trip GenerationThe trip generation calculations are based on the trip generation rates published by Palm Beach
County. The maximum development potential of the existing designation was calculated
assuming a maximum development intensity of 129 dwelling units. For the analysis of the future
proposed designation, a development potential of 1,030 dwelling units plus 112,000 square feet
of commercial use and 112,123 square feet of civic use was assumed.
As indicated in Table 5, the net change in trips for the maximum development potential under
the proposed FLU for this parcel is 13,375 new external daily trips, 789 new external AM peak-
hour trips (241 in/548 out) and 1,086 new external PM peak-hour trips (628 in/458 out).
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc | Page 14
Table 5Trip Generation Potential – Long-Term Horizon (Year 2040)
Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak HourTrips Total In Out Total In Out
Current FLU DesignationGross Trips
Single Family Detached 129 DU 1,290 97 24 73 132 83 49
Net New External Trips: Existing FLU 1,290 97 24 73 132 83 49
Proposed FLU DesignationGross Trips
Single Family Detached 1,030 DU 10,300 773 193 580 857 540 317Church/Synagogue SF 1,021 63 39 24 62 30 32General Commercial SF 7,310 108 67 41 646 310 336
Subtotal 18,631 944 299 645 1,565 880 685
Internal Capture daily AM PMSingle Family Detached 6.49% 1.29% 6.77% 668 10 4 6 58 30 28Church/Synagogue 1.96% 0.00% 0.00% 20 0 0 0 0 0 0General Commercial 9.14% 9.30% 8.98% 668 10 6 4 58 28 30
1,356 20 10 10 116 58 58
Pass-byGeneral Commercial 39.3% 2,610 38 24 14 231 111 120
Net New External Trips: Proposed FLU 14,665 886 265 621 1,218 711 507
Net Change: Proposed FLU - Existing FLU 13,375 789 241 548 1,086 628 458Trip generation was calculated using the following data:
Daily Trip GenerationSingle Family detached PBC =Church/Synagogue PBC = T = 9.11 * SFGeneral Commercial PBC =
AM Peak Hour Trip GenerationSingle Family detached PBC =Church/Synagogue PBC = T = 0.56 * SF (62% in / 38% out)General Commercial PBC =
PM Peak Hour Trip GenerationSingle Family detached PBC =Church/Synagogue PBC = T = 0.55 * SF (48% in / 52% out)General Commercial PBC =
T = 10 * Units
Intensity
112,123112,000
T = .65*Ln(SF/1000)+5.83
Land Use
Ln(T) = .67* LN(SF/1000)+.3.31 / 1,000 sq. ft. (48% in / 52% out)
Ln(T) = .90 * Ln(Units)+.51 (63% in / 37% out)
T = .96 * SF (62% in / 38% out)
T = .75 * Units (25% in / 75% out)
Traffic Distribution and AssignmentTraffic distribution is the pairing of trip ends from the subject site with other land uses in the
area. These trips were assigned to the surrounding roadways based upon a review of the
roadway network proposed to be in place at the time of buildout and its travel time
characteristics.
The peak-hour trips for the project were then assigned to the surrounding roadway network
proposed to be in place for the 2040 analysis year. The assignment for this analysis includes
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc | Page 15
the overall cost-feasible roadway network. Figure 3 illustrates the project traffic assignment to
the surrounding roadway network for the long-term (Year 2040) analysis.
Radius of Development InfluenceBased upon the thresholds published in Policy 3.5-d of the Palm Beach County Future Land
Use Plan, the radius of development influence for the daily volume of project traffic anticipated
to be generated in the long-range planning horizon timeframe (13,375 trips) is four miles.
LEGEND
SITE
21% 22%
21%
7%
11%
38%
15%
8%
FIGURE 3FUTURE (2040) PROJECT DISTRIBUTION
IOTA CAROL140190000
1%
9%
34% 24%
28%
7%
5%
SITE
ROAD NETWORK PERCENT ASSIGNMENT
FUTURE ROAD NETWORK
XX%
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc | Page 17
Long-Range Level of Service AnalysisSignificance was determined in accordance with the Daily LOS D service volumes defined in
Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code. The daily project trips
were assigned to the surrounding roadway network within the study radius in order to evaluate
the project’s impact in comparison to the LOS D adopted service volume. As indicated in Table
6, the following roadway segments are significantly impacted by the proposed FLU amendment
in the long range analysis:
· Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road between Northlake Boulevard and Southern Boulevard
· Northlake Boulevard between Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road and Ibis Road
· Orange Boulevard between Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road and 60 th Street North
· 60th Street North between Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road and Royal Palm Beach
Boulevard
· Persimmon Boulevard between Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road and Royal Palm
Beach Boulevard
· Okeechobee Boulevard between Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road and Folsom Road
An analysis was then conducted to evaluate long-range level of service on these roadways. For
the baseline analysis, the Year 2040 volumes published by the Palm Beach County
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) were utilized. Traffic generated by the approved
Minto West and Avenir projects and the currently pending Indian Trails Grove project were then
added along with traffic from this proposed FLU change in order to determine total Year 2040
volumes. The analysis results are shown in Table 6. As shown in this tables, several roadway
segments within the study area are not projected to meet the adopted level of service
standards.
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc | Page 18
Tabl
e6
Long
-Ter
m(Y
ear2
040)
LOS
Ana
lyse
s
2040
Indi
anTr
ails
Perc
ent
MPO
Mod
elM
into
Wes
tAv
enir
Gro
ve20
40Vo
lum
eTr
affic
Traf
ficTr
affic
TOTA
LTR
AFFI
Cv/
cSe
min
ole
Prat
tWhi
tney
Road
Nor
thla
keBo
ulev
ard
Tem
ple
Boul
evar
d4L
Clas
sI33
,200
21%
3,08
09.
28%
Yes
31,0
005,
546
5,81
72,
970
48,4
1314
5.8%
Tem
ple
Boul
evar
dO
rang
eBo
ulev
ard
4LCl
assI
33,2
0021
%3,
080
9.28
%Ye
s31
,000
5,54
65,
817
2,97
048
,413
145.
8%O
rang
eBo
ulev
ard
60th
Stre
et4L
Clas
sI33
,200
11%
1,61
34.
86%
Yes
28,6
007,
487
5,52
64,
667
47,8
9314
4.3%
60th
Stre
etSy
cam
ore
Driv
e4L
Clas
sI33
,200
38%
5,57
316
.79%
Yes
38,1
0010
,538
4,65
416
,122
74,9
8722
5.9%
Syca
mor
eDr
ive
Oke
echo
bee
Boul
evar
d4L
Clas
sI33
,200
28%
4,10
612
.37%
Yes
39,0
009,
151
4,07
212
,728
69,0
5720
8.0%
Oke
echo
bee
Boul
evar
dSo
uthe
rnBo
ulev
ard
4LCl
assI
33,2
0015
%2,
200
6.63
%Ye
s22
,300
6,10
12,
036
6,36
439
,001
117.
5%
Coco
nutB
oule
vard
Nor
thla
keBl
vdO
rang
eBo
ulev
ard
2LCl
assI
15,2
001%
147
0.97
%N
o10
,900
1,38
74,
654
424
17,5
1211
5.2%
Ora
nge
Boul
evar
dPe
rsim
mon
Blvd
2LCl
assI
15,2
001%
147
0.97
%N
o4,
400
555
2,32
742
47,
853
51.7
%N
orth
lake
Blvd
Sem
inol
ePr
attW
hitn
eyRo
ad14
0th
Aven
ue4L
Clas
sII
3320
021
%3,
080
9.28
%Ye
s19
,500
4,43
76,
981
8,91
042
,908
129.
2%14
0th
Aven
ueCo
conu
tBou
leva
rd4L
Clas
sII
3320
022
%3,
226
9.72
%Ye
s32
,200
4,43
758
28,
910
49,3
5514
8.7%
Coco
nutB
oule
vard
(Roy
alPa
lmBe
ach
Blvd
)Ib
isRo
ad4L
Clas
sII
3320
022
%3,
226
9.72
%Ye
s34
,000
5,54
634
,612
9,33
486
,718
261.
2%O
rang
eBo
ulev
ard
Sem
inol
ePr
attW
hitn
eyRo
ad14
0th
Aven
ue2L
Clas
sI15
,200
9%1,
320
8.68
%Ye
s10
,000
832
291
3,81
816
,261
107.
0%14
0th
Aven
ueCo
conu
tBou
leva
rd2L
Clas
sI15
,200
7%1,
027
6.76
%Ye
s9,
800
693
1,74
52,
970
16,2
3510
6.8%
Coco
nutB
oule
vard
(Roy
alPa
lmBe
ach
Blvd
)60
thSt
reet
2LCl
assI
15,2
005%
733
4.82
%Ye
s12
,400
03,
490
2,12
118
,744
123.
3%60
thSt
reet
Nor
thSe
min
ole-
Prat
tWhi
tney
Road
140t
hAv
enue
2LCl
assI
15,2
0034
%4,
986
32.8
0%Ye
s10
,900
058
25,
940
22,4
0814
7.4%
140t
hAv
enue
Roya
lPal
mBe
ach
Blvd
2LCl
assI
15,2
0024
%3,
520
23.1
6%Ye
s10
,900
4,43
787
36,
364
26,0
9417
1.7%
Pers
imm
onBo
ulev
ard
Sem
inol
ePr
attW
hitn
eyRo
ad14
0th
Aven
ue2L
Clas
sI15
,200
5%73
34.
82%
Yes
7,40
04,
992
291
2,12
115
,537
102.
2%
140t
hAv
enue
Roya
lPal
mBe
ach
Blvd
2LCl
assI
15,2
005%
733
4.82
%Ye
s19
,700
4,57
629
12,
121
27,4
2118
0.4%
Oke
echo
bee
Blvd
Sem
inol
ePr
attW
hitn
eyRo
adB
Road
2LCl
assI
3320
08%
1,17
33.
53%
Yes
23,5
002,
773
1,74
53,
394
32,5
8598
.1%
BRo
adFo
lsom
Road
2LCl
assI
3320
07%
1,02
73.
09%
Yes
30,2
002,
773
873
2,97
037
,843
114.
0%
Road
way
Lane
sFa
cilit
yCl
assi
ficat
ion
LOS
DSe
rvic
eVo
lum
ePe
rcen
tIm
pact
Sign
ifica
ntIm
pact
??Io
taCa
rol
Daily
Trip
sFr
omTo
Assi
gnm
ent
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc | Page 19
CONCLUSION
The foregoing comprehensive plan traffic analysis has been conducted to evaluate the
proposed future land use change from for the Iota Carol site located in unincorporated Palm
Beach County. The proposed plan will convert the existing RR-10 designation on the site to RR
1.25 with Commercial and Civic uses. Based on the analyses conducted for the short-term and
long-term planning horizons, the adopted level of service standards are anticipated to still be
met on any roadways significantly impacted by project traffic during the short range (Test 2-Five
Year, Year 2020) analysis. The Year 2040 analysis indicates that some of the significantly
impacted roadways segments will not meet the adopted level of service criteria; however, this
analysis was based upon MPO model data using the Year 2040 cost feasible plan. It is noted
that the analysis includes traffic volumes generated by the approved Minto West and Avenir
projects as well as the proposed Indian Trails Grove project, all of which will be providing
roadway impact fee and proportionate share payments that may be applied toward further
improvements in this area. Additionally, this project will be subject to roadway impact fee and
proportionate share payments that will provide for further improvements on the transportation
network in the surrounding area. Full details will be determined in the process of the Traffic
Performance Standards (TPS) analysis for this site.
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc | Page 1
APPENDIX A: PCN SHEETS
Kim ley>>> Horn
Location Address
Municipality UNINCORPORATED
Parcel Control Number 00-40-42-33-00-000-1010
Subdivision
Official Records Book 25973 Page 1381
Sale Date APR-2013
Legal Description33-42-40, ALL OF SEC A/K/A TRS1 THUR 56 PALM BEACH CITRUS FARMS ASIN OR3251 P318 (LESS NLY 1094.96 FT OF SLY 4129.41 FT
Owners
IOTA CAROL LLC
Mailing address
4675 MACARTHUR CT STE 1550
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 2042
Sales Date Price OR Book/Page Sale Type Owner
APR-2013 $2,900,100 25973 / 1381 CERT OF TITLE IOTA CAROL LLCJAN-2003 $10,170,000 14782 / 0958 WARRANTY DEED DELRAY LINTON ASSOCIATES LLCNOV-2002 $10 14505 / 0426 QUIT CLAIM CHAPMAN ADRIAN R TR &FEB-2002 $10 13623 / 0103 QUIT CLAIM CHAPMAN ADRIAN R TRAPR-1990 $3,036,000 06422 / 0290 WARRANTY DEED
12
No Exemption Information Available.
Number of Units 0 *Total Square Feet 0 Acres 583.10
Use Code5100 - AG Classification CROPSOIL CLASS 1
ZoningAR - Agricultural Residential ( 00-UNINCORPORATED )
Tax Year 2015 2014 2013
Improvement Value $0 $0 $0
Land Value $6,997,200 $6,997,200 $6,997,200
Total Market Value $6,997,200 $6,997,200 $6,997,200
All values are as of January 1st each year
Tax Year 2015 2014 2013
Assessed Value $757,650 $757,650 $759,985
Exemption Amount $0 $0 $0
Taxable Value $757,650 $757,650 $759,985
Tax Year 2015 2014 2013
Ad Valorem $14,088 $14,244 $14,336
Non Ad Valorem $32,298 $32,298 $32,698
Total tax $46,386 $46,542 $47,034
Page 1 of 1
12/23/2015http://www.pbcgov.com/papa/Asps/PropertyDetail/PropertyDetail.aspx?parcel=00404233...
Location Address
Municipality UNINCORPORATED
Parcel Control Number 00-40-42-33-00-000-3010
Subdivision
Official Records Book 25973 Page 1381
Sale Date APR-2013
Legal Description33-42-40, NLY 1094.96 FT OF SLY 4129.41 FT OF ELY 730 FT OF WLY1888.41 FT, NLY 1497.52FT OF SLY 3049.37 FT OF ELY 820
Owners
IOTA CAROL LLC
Mailing address
4675 MACARTHUR CT STE 1550
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 2042
Sales Date Price OR Book/Page Sale Type Owner
APR-2013 $2,900,100 25973 / 1381 CERT OF TITLE IOTA CAROL LLCJAN-2003 $10,170,000 14782 / 0958 WARRANTY DEED DELRAY LINTON ASSOCIATES LLCNOV-2002 $10 14505 / 0426 QUIT CLAIM CHAPMAN ADRIAN R TR &APR-1990 $6,000,000 06422 / 0291 WARRANTY DEEDJUL-1988 $550,000 05766 / 0389 WARRANTY DEED
No Exemption Information Available.
Number of Units 2 *Total Square Feet 2496 Acres 63.04
Use Code5100 - AG Classification CROPSOIL CLASS 1
ZoningAR - Agricultural Residential ( 00-UNINCORPORATED )
Tax Year 2015 2014 2013
Improvement Value $94,381 $97,000 $90,531
Land Value $756,480 $756,480 $756,480
Total Market Value $850,861 $853,480 $847,011
All values are as of January 1st each year
Tax Year 2015 2014 2013
Assessed Value $283,441 $286,060 $268,791
Exemption Amount $0 $0 $0
Taxable Value $283,441 $286,060 $268,791
Tax Year 2015 2014 2013
Ad Valorem $5,270 $5,378 $5,070
Non Ad Valorem $4,180 $4,184 $4,178
Total tax $9,450 $9,562 $9,248
Page 1 of 1
12/23/2015http://www.pbcgov.com/papa/Asps/PropertyDetail/PropertyDetail.aspx?parcel=00404233...
Location Address
Municipality UNINCORPORATED
Parcel Control Number 00-40-42-28-00-000-9000
Subdivision
Official Records Book 25973 Page 1381
Sale Date APR-2013
Legal Description 28-42-40, ALL
Owners
IOTA CAROL LLC
Mailing address
4675 MACARTHUR CT STE 1550
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 2042
Sales Date Price OR Book/Page Sale Type Owner
APR-2013 $2,900,100 25973 / 1381 CERT OF TITLE IOTA CAROL LLCSEP-2003 $10 15855 / 1578 WARRANTY DEED EXODUS 613 LLCAPR-2003 $11,680,000 15157 / 0756 WARRANTY DEED EXODUS 613 LLCAPR-2003 $10 15042 / 0839 WARRANTY DEED LULFS GROVES LLLPJUL-2001 $10 12741 / 0374 WARRANTY DEED LULFS GROVES
12
No Exemption Information Available.
Number of Units 0 *Total Square Feet 0 Acres 641.80
Use Code6000 - AG ClassificationGRAGSOIL CLASS 1
ZoningAP - Agricultural Production ( 00-UNINCORPORATED )
Tax Year 2015 2014 2013
Improvement Value $0 $0 $0
Land Value $7,701,600 $7,701,600 $6,738,900
Total Market Value $7,701,600 $7,701,600 $6,738,900
All values are as of January 1st each year
Tax Year 2015 2014 2013
Assessed Value $514,499 $509,912 $720,680
Exemption Amount $0 $0 $0
Taxable Value $514,499 $509,912 $720,680
Tax Year 2015 2014 2013
Ad Valorem $9,566 $9,587 $13,595
Non Ad Valorem $35,949 $35,949 $35,949
Total tax $45,515 $45,536 $49,544
Page 1 of 1
12/23/2015http://www.pbcgov.com/papa/Asps/PropertyDetail/PropertyDetail.aspx?parcel=00404228...
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc
APPENDIX B: TPS OUTPUT WORKSHEETS
ROAD NAME: Report Created: 12/21/2015CURRENT YEAR:ANALYSIS YEAR:GROWTH RATE:
Time PeriodDirection 2-way NB/EB SB/WB 2-way NB/EB SB/WBExisting Volume 987 508 535 1062 535 527Peak Volume 987 508 535 1062 535 527Diversion(%) 0 0 0 0 0 0Volume after Diversion 987 508 535 1062 535 527
Committed Developments Type % CompleteSeminole Orange Plaza 30 14 16 61 31 30 NR 28%Planet Kids IX - SPW 28 15 13 28 13 15 NR 0%Minto West 276 135 141 553 383 169 NR 0%Avenir 117 60 57 154 87 67 Res 0%Total Committed Developments 451 224 227 796 514 281Total Committed Residential 117 60 57 154 87 67Total Committed Non-Residential 334 164 170 642 427 214Double Count Reduction 29 15 14 39 22 17
Total Discounted Committed Developments 422 209 213 757 492 264
Historical Growth 248 128 135 267 135 133Comm Dev+1% Growth 472 235 240 811 519 291Growth Volume Used 472 235 240 811 519 291Total Volume 1459 743 775 1873 1054 818
LanesLOS D Capacity 1480 1140 1140 1480 1140 1140Link Meets Test 1? YES YES YES NO YES YESLOS E Capacity 1570 1440 1440 1570 1440 1440Link Meets Test 2? YES YES YES NO YES YES
PSF: 1Link Analysis
AM PM
2L
2020 TO: Midpoint4.59% COUNT DATE: 1/20/2015
Input DataSeminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 24062015 FROM: Orange Blvd
ROAD NAME: Report Created: 12/21/2015CURRENT YEAR:ANALYSIS YEAR:GROWTH RATE:
Time PeriodDirection 2-way NB/EB SB/WB 2-way NB/EB SB/WBExisting Volume 987 508 535 1062 535 527Peak Volume 987 508 535 1062 535 527Diversion(%) 0 0 0 0 0 0Volume after Diversion 987 508 535 1062 535 527
Committed Developments Type % CompleteSeminole Orange Plaza 30 14 16 61 31 30 NR 28%Planet Kids IX - SPW 28 15 13 28 13 15 NR 0%Minto West 276 135 141 553 383 169 NR 0%Avenir 117 60 57 154 87 67 Res 0%Total Committed Developments 451 224 227 796 514 281Total Committed Residential 117 60 57 154 87 67Total Committed Non-Residential 334 164 170 642 427 214Double Count Reduction 29 15 14 39 22 17
Total Discounted Committed Developments 422 209 213 757 492 264
Historical Growth 248 128 135 267 135 133Comm Dev+1% Growth 472 235 240 811 519 291Growth Volume Used 472 235 240 811 519 291Total Volume 1459 743 775 1873 1054 818
LanesLOS D Capacity 1480 1140 1140 1480 1140 1140Link Meets Test 1? YES YES YES NO YES YESLOS E Capacity 1570 1440 1440 1570 1440 1440Link Meets Test 2? YES YES YES NO YES YES
2L
PSF: 1Link Analysis
AM PM
2020 TO: Northlake Blvd4.59% COUNT DATE: 1/20/2015
2015 FROM: Midpoint
Input DataSeminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 2406
ROAD NAME: Report Created: 12/21/2015CURRENT YEAR:ANALYSIS YEAR:GROWTH RATE:
Time PeriodDirection 2-way NB/EB SB/WB 2-way NB/EB SB/WBExisting Volume 1218 664 622 1287 626 665Peak Volume 1218 664 622 1287 626 665Diversion(%) 0 0 0 0 0 0Volume after Diversion 1218 664 622 1287 626 665
Committed Developments Type % CompleteArden PUD 225 153 72 241 98 143 Res 0%Seminole Orange Plaza 40 21 19 82 40 41 NR 28%Minto West 373 182 191 746 517 229 NR 0%Loxahatchee Groves Commons 53 26 27 113 57 56 NR 0%Avenir 94 48 45 123 69 54 Res 0%Total Committed Developments 785 430 354 1305 781 523Total Committed Residential 319 201 117 364 167 197Total Committed Non-Residential 466 229 237 941 614 326Double Count Reduction 80 46 29 91 42 49
Total Discounted Committed Developments 705 384 325 1214 739 474
Historical Growth 251 137 128 266 129 137Comm Dev+1% Growth 767 418 357 1280 771 508Growth Volume Used 767 418 357 1280 771 508Total Volume 1985 1082 979 2567 1397 1173
LanesLOS D Capacity 3220 1960 1960 3220 1960 1960Link Meets Test 1? YES YES YES YES YES YESLOS E Capacity 3400 1960 1960 3400 1960 1960Link Meets Test 2? YES YES YES YES YES YES
4LD
PSF: 1Link Analysis
AM PM
2020 TO: Orange Blvd3.82% COUNT DATE: 1/20/2015
Input DataSeminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 24082015 FROM: 60th St N
ROAD NAME: Report Created: 12/21/2015CURRENT YEAR:ANALYSIS YEAR:GROWTH RATE:
Time PeriodDirection 2-way NB/EB SB/WB 2-way NB/EB SB/WBExisting Volume 1558 856 793 1488 870 626Peak Volume 1558 856 793 1488 870 626Diversion(%) 0 0 0 0 0 0Volume after Diversion 1558 856 793 1488 870 626
Committed Developments Type % CompleteArden PUD 225 153 72 241 98 143 Res 0%Seminole Orange Plaza 40 21 19 82 40 41 NR 28%Minto West 525 268 256 1050 322 728 NR 0%Loxahatchee Groves Commons 53 26 27 113 57 56 NR 0%Avenir 88 45 42 115 65 50 Res 0%Total Committed Developments 931 513 416 1601 582 1018Total Committed Residential 313 198 114 356 163 193Total Committed Non-Residential 618 315 302 1245 419 825Double Count Reduction 78 50 29 89 41 48
Total Discounted Committed Developments 853 463 387 1512 541 970
Historical Growth 242 133 123 231 135 97Comm Dev+1% Growth 932 507 427 1588 585 1002Growth Volume Used 932 507 427 1588 585 1002Total Volume 2490 1363 1220 3076 1455 1628
LanesLOS D Capacity 3220 1960 1960 3220 1960 1960Link Meets Test 1? YES YES YES YES YES YESLOS E Capacity 3400 1960 1960 3400 1960 1960Link Meets Test 2? YES YES YES YES YES YES
Input DataSeminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 34422015 FROM: Sycamore Dr2020 TO: Persimmon Blvd2.93% COUNT DATE: 1/12/2015
PSF: 1Link Analysis
AM PM
4LD
ROAD NAME: Report Created: 12/21/2015CURRENT YEAR:ANALYSIS YEAR:GROWTH RATE:
Time PeriodDirection 2-way NB/EB SB/WB 2-way NB/EB SB/WBExisting Volume 1558 856 793 1488 870 626Peak Volume 1558 856 793 1488 870 626Diversion(%) 0 0 0 0 0 0Volume after Diversion 1558 856 793 1488 870 626
Committed Developments Type % CompleteArden PUD 225 153 72 241 98 143 Res 0%Seminole Orange Plaza 40 21 19 82 40 41 NR 28%Minto West 525 256 268 1050 728 322 NR 0%Loxahatchee Groves Commons 53 26 27 113 57 56 NR 0%Avenir 88 45 42 115 65 50 Res 0%Total Committed Developments 931 501 428 1601 988 612Total Committed Residential 313 198 114 356 163 193Total Committed Non-Residential 618 303 314 1245 825 419Double Count Reduction 78 50 29 89 41 48
Total Discounted Committed Developments 853 451 399 1512 947 564
Historical Growth 242 133 123 231 135 97Comm Dev+1% Growth 932 495 439 1588 991 596Growth Volume Used 932 495 439 1588 991 596Total Volume 2490 1351 1232 3076 1861 1222
LanesLOS D Capacity 3220 1960 1960 3220 1960 1960Link Meets Test 1? YES YES YES YES YES YESLOS E Capacity 3400 1960 1960 3400 1960 1960Link Meets Test 2? YES YES YES YES YES YES
Input DataSeminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 34422015 FROM: Persimmon Blvd2020 TO: 60th St N2.93% COUNT DATE: 1/12/2015
4LD
PSF: 1Link Analysis
AM PM
ROAD NAME: Report Created: 12/21/2015CURRENT YEAR:ANALYSIS YEAR:GROWTH RATE:
Time PeriodDirection 2-way NB/EB SB/WB 2-way NB/EB SB/WBExisting Volume 1584 633 951 1580 1035 545Peak Volume 1584 633 951 1580 1035 545Diversion(%) 0 0 0 0 0 0Volume after Diversion 1584 633 951 1580 1035 545
Committed Developments Type % CompleteArden PUD 225 153 72 241 98 143 Res 0%Seminole Orange Plaza 40 21 19 82 40 41 NR 28%Minto West 456 233 223 912 280 632 NR 0%Groves Town Center 22 5 17 77 44 32 NR 0%Loxahatchee Groves Commons 53 26 27 113 57 56 NR 0%Avenir 82 42 40 108 61 47 Res 0%Total Committed Developments 878 480 398 1533 580 951Total Committed Residential 307 195 112 349 159 190Total Committed Non-Residential 571 285 286 1184 421 761Double Count Reduction 77 49 28 87 40 48
Total Discounted Committed Developments 801 431 370 1446 540 903
Historical Growth 0 0 0 0 0 0Comm Dev+1% Growth 882 463 419 1527 593 931Growth Volume Used 882 463 419 1527 593 931Total Volume 2466 1096 1370 3107 1628 1476
LanesLOS D Capacity 1480 1140 1140 1480 1140 1140Link Meets Test 1? NO YES NO NO NO NOLOS E Capacity 1570 1440 1440 1570 1440 1440Link Meets Test 2? NO YES YES NO NO NO
Input DataSeminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 34242015 FROM: Okeechobee Blvd2020 TO: Sycamore Dr0% COUNT DATE: 3/9/2015
2L
PSF: 1Link Analysis
AM PM
ROAD NAME: Report Created: 12/22/2015CURRENT YEAR:ANALYSIS YEAR:GROWTH RATE:
Time PeriodDirection 2-way NB/EB SB/WB 2-way NB/EB SB/WBExisting Volume 1294 437 861 1275 840 447Peak Volume 1294 437 861 1275 840 447Diversion(%) 0 0 0 0 0 0Volume after Diversion 1294 437 861 1275 840 447
Committed Developments Type % CompleteArden PUD 305 208 97 327 133 194 Res 0%Minto West 304 155 148 608 186 422 NR 0%Bink's Corporate Center 6 3 3 21 11 10 NR 15%Groves Town Center 30 7 23 102 59 43 NR 0%Loxahatchee Groves Commons 70 35 36 150 76 74 NR 0%Palm Beach State College 69 9 60 88 40 47 NR 0%Avenir 41 21 20 54 30 24 Res 0%Total Committed Developments 825 438 387 1350 535 814Total Committed Residential 346 229 117 381 163 218Total Committed Non-Residential 479 209 270 969 372 596Double Count Reduction 87 42 29 95 41 55
Total Discounted Committed Developments 738 396 358 1255 494 759
Historical Growth 0 0 0 0 0 0Comm Dev+1% Growth 804 418 402 1320 537 782Growth Volume Used 804 418 402 1320 537 782Total Volume 2098 855 1263 2595 1377 1229
LanesLOS D Capacity 3220 1960 1960 3220 1960 1960Link Meets Test 1? YES YES YES YES YES YESLOS E Capacity 3400 1960 1960 3400 1960 1960Link Meets Test 2? YES YES YES YES YES YES
Input DataSeminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 34202015 FROM: Southern Blvd2020 TO: Midpoint0% COUNT DATE: 1/12/2015
PSF: 1Link Analysis
AM PM
4LD
ROAD NAME: Report Created: 12/22/2015CURRENT YEAR:ANALYSIS YEAR:GROWTH RATE:
Time PeriodDirection 2-way NB/EB SB/WB 2-way NB/EB SB/WBExisting Volume 1294 437 861 1275 840 447Peak Volume 1294 437 861 1275 840 447Diversion(%) 0 0 0 0 0 0Volume after Diversion 1294 437 861 1275 840 447
Committed Developments Type % CompleteArden PUD 305 208 97 327 133 194 Res 0%Minto West 304 155 148 608 186 422 NR 0%Bink's Corporate Center 6 3 3 21 11 10 NR 15%Groves Town Center 30 7 23 102 59 43 NR 0%Loxahatchee Groves Commons 70 35 36 150 76 74 NR 0%Palm Beach State College 69 9 60 88 40 47 NR 0%Avenir 41 21 20 54 30 24 Res 0%Total Committed Developments 825 438 387 1350 535 814Total Committed Residential 346 229 117 381 163 218Total Committed Non-Residential 479 209 270 969 372 596Double Count Reduction 87 42 29 95 41 55
Total Discounted Committed Developments 738 396 358 1255 494 759
Historical Growth 0 0 0 0 0 0Comm Dev+1% Growth 804 418 402 1320 537 782Growth Volume Used 804 418 402 1320 537 782Total Volume 2098 855 1263 2595 1377 1229
LanesLOS D Capacity 3220 1960 1960 3220 1960 1960Link Meets Test 1? YES YES YES YES YES YESLOS E Capacity 3400 1960 1960 3400 1960 1960Link Meets Test 2? YES YES YES YES YES YES
Input DataSeminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 34202015 FROM: Midpoint2020 TO: Okeechobee Blvd0% COUNT DATE: 1/12/2015
4LD
PSF: 1Link Analysis
AM PM
ROAD NAME: Report Created: 12/21/2015CURRENT YEAR:ANALYSIS YEAR:GROWTH RATE:
Time PeriodDirection 2-way NB/EB SB/WB 2-way NB/EB SB/WBExisting Volume 910 530 380 823 307 528Peak Volume 910 530 380 823 307 528Diversion(%) 0 0 0 0 0 0Volume after Diversion 910 530 380 823 307 528
Committed Developments Type % CompletePalms West Medical 0 0 0 1 0 0 NR 92%Palms West Hospital 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 95%Arden PUD 80 55 26 86 35 51 Res 0%Southern Palm Crossing 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 100%Fox DRI 1 1 1 3 1 1 NR 94%Tract 115-Village Center 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0%Minto West 138 67 71 276 192 85 NR 0%Groves Town Center 4 1 3 15 9 6 NR 0%Loxahatchee Groves Commons 11 5 5 23 11 11 NR 0%Palm Beach State College 8 1 7 11 5 6 NR 0%Avenir 35 17 18 46 20 26 Res 0%Total Committed Developments 277 147 131 461 273 186Total Committed Residential 115 72 44 132 55 77Total Committed Non-Residential 162 75 87 329 218 109Double Count Reduction 29 15 11 33 14 19
Total Discounted Committed Developments 248 132 120 428 259 167
Historical Growth 0 0 0 0 0 0Comm Dev+1% Growth 294 159 139 470 275 194Growth Volume Used 294 159 139 470 275 194Total Volume 1204 689 519 1293 582 722
LanesLOS D Capacity 1480 1140 1140 1480 1140 1140Link Meets Test 1? YES YES YES YES YES YESLOS E Capacity 1570 1440 1440 1570 1440 1440Link Meets Test 2? YES YES YES YES YES YES
Input DataOkeechobee Blvd STATION: 34192015 FROM: MIDPOINT2020 TO: E Rd0% COUNT DATE: 1/12/2015
PSF: 1Link Analysis
AM PM
2L
ROAD NAME: Report Created: 12/21/2015CURRENT YEAR:ANALYSIS YEAR:GROWTH RATE:
Time PeriodDirection 2-way NB/EB SB/WB 2-way NB/EB SB/WBExisting Volume 910 530 380 823 307 528Peak Volume 910 530 380 823 307 528Diversion(%) 0 0 0 0 0 0Volume after Diversion 910 530 380 823 307 528
Committed Developments Type % CompletePalms West Medical 0 0 0 1 0 0 NR 92%Palms West Hospital 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 95%Arden PUD 80 55 26 86 35 51 Res 0%Southern Palm Crossing 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 100%Fox DRI 1 1 1 3 1 1 NR 94%Tract 115-Village Center 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0%Minto West 138 67 71 276 192 85 NR 0%Groves Town Center 3 2 1 10 4 6 NR 0%Loxahatchee Groves Commons 7 4 3 15 7 8 NR 0%Palm Beach State College 6 5 1 7 4 3 NR 0%Avenir 35 17 18 46 20 26 Res 0%Total Committed Developments 270 151 121 444 263 180Total Committed Residential 115 72 44 132 55 77Total Committed Non-Residential 155 79 77 312 208 103Double Count Reduction 29 16 11 33 14 19
Total Discounted Committed Developments 241 135 110 411 249 161
Historical Growth 0 0 0 0 0 0Comm Dev+1% Growth 287 162 129 453 265 188Growth Volume Used 287 162 129 453 265 188Total Volume 1197 692 509 1276 572 716
LanesLOS D Capacity 1480 1140 1140 1480 1140 1140Link Meets Test 1? YES YES YES YES YES YESLOS E Capacity 1570 1440 1440 1570 1440 1440Link Meets Test 2? YES YES YES YES YES YES
Input DataOkeechobee Blvd STATION: 34192015 FROM: Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd2020 TO: MIDPOINT0% COUNT DATE: 1/12/2015
2L
PSF: 1Link Analysis
AM PM
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc
APPENDIX C: INTERNAL CAPTURE WORKSHEETS
Project Number:Project Name: IOTA CAROL
Scenario: Proposed FLU DesignationAnalysis Period: PM _ , Daily_ X , AM _ .
Single Family Detached Analyst:ITE LUC: 210 Date: 12/21/2015
Size: 1,030 DUTotal Internal External
Enter from External: 4,816 Enter 5,150 334 4,816Exit to External: 4,816 Exit 5,150 334 4,816
Total 10,300 668 9,632% 100% 6% 94% 9.0% 464 Demand
Demand 1.0% 52 329 BalancedBalanced 5 9.0% 329 Demand
Demand 1.0% 5 Demand 9.0% 4641.0% 52 Demand Balanced 329
5 Balanced Demand 9.0% 329Church/Synagogue 1.0% 5 Demand Land Use C: General Commercial
ITE LUC: 560 ITE LUC: 820Size: 112,123 SF Size: 112,000 SF
Enter from External: Total Internal External Demand Balanced Demand Total Internal External Enter from External:501 Enter 511 10 501 1.0% 5 5 1.0% 37 Enter 3655 334 3321 3,321500 Exit 510 10 500 Exit 3,655 334 3321 3,321
Exit to External: Total 1021 20 1001 Total 7310 668 6642 Exit to External:% 100% 2% 98% Demand Balanced Demand % 100% 9% 91%
1.0% 5 5 1.0% 37
NET EXTERNAL TRIPS FOR MULTI-USE DEVELOPMENT
Land UseA B C Total
Single Family DetachedChurch/SynagogueGeneral Commercial4,816 501 3,321 8,6384,816 500 3,321 8,6379,632 1,001 6,642 17,275
10,300 1,021 7,310 18,631File Name = k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\[trip gen iota carol.xls]ic_daily 6.49% 1.96% 9.14%Print Date = 12/28/15Print Time = 2:37 PM Internal Capture = 7.28%
EnterExitTotal
Single Use Trip Gen Estimate
ITE MULTI-USE PROJECT INTERNAL CAPTURE WORKSHEET(ITE, Chapter 7, Trip Generation Handbook , 2nd Edition, June 2004)
Task Number:
Land Use A:
Land Use B:
Category
Project Number:Project Name: IOTA CAROL
Scenario: Proposed FLU DesignationAnalysis Period: PM _ , Daily_ , AM _X .
Single Family Detached Analyst:ITE LUC: 210 Date: 12/21/2015
Size: 1,030 DUTotal Internal External
Enter from External: 189 Enter 193 4 189Exit to External: 574 Exit 580 6 574
Total 773 10 763% 100% 1% 99% 9.0% 17 Demand
Demand 1.0% 6 4 BalancedBalanced 0 9.0% 4 Demand
Demand 1.0% 0 Demand 9.0% 521.0% 2 Demand Balanced 6
0 Balanced Demand 9.0% 6Church/Synagogue 1.0% 0 Demand Land Use C: General Commercial
ITE LUC: 560 ITE LUC: 820Size: 112,123 SF Size: 112,000 SF
Enter from External: Total Internal External Demand Balanced Demand Total Internal External Enter from External:39 Enter 39 0 39 1.0% 0 0 1.0% 1 Enter 67 6 60.6624 6124 Exit 24 0 24 Exit 41 4 36.8576 37
Exit to External: Total 63 0 63 Total 107.52 10 97.52 Exit to External:% 100% 0% 100% Demand Balanced Demand % 100% 9% 91%
1.0% 0 0 1.0% 0
NET EXTERNAL TRIPS FOR MULTI-USE DEVELOPMENT
Land UseA B C Total
Single Family DetachedChurch/SynagogueGeneral Commercial189 39 61 289574 24 37 635763 63 98 924
773 63 108 944File Name = k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\[trip gen iota carol.xls]ic_am 1.29% 0.00% 9.30%Print Date = 12/28/15Print Time = 2:37 PM Internal Capture = 2.12%
EnterExitTotal
Single Use Trip Gen Estimate
ITE MULTI-USE PROJECT INTERNAL CAPTURE WORKSHEET(ITE, Chapter 7, Trip Generation Handbook , 2nd Edition, June 2004)
Task Number:
Land Use A:
Land Use B:
Category
Project Number:Project Name: IOTA CAROL
Scenario: Proposed FLU DesignationAnalysis Period: PM _X , Daily_ , AM _ .
Single Family Detached Analyst:ITE LUC: 210 Date: 12/21/2015
Size: 1,030 DUTotal Internal External
Enter from External: 510 Enter 540 30 510Exit to External: 289 Exit 317 28 289
Total 857 58 799% 100% 7% 93% 9.0% 49 Demand
Demand 1.0% 3 30 BalancedBalanced 0 9.0% 30 Demand
Demand 1.0% 0 Demand 9.0% 291.0% 5 Demand Balanced 28
0 Balanced Demand 9.0% 28Church/Synagogue 1.0% 0 Demand Land Use C: General Commercial
ITE LUC: 560 ITE LUC: 820Size: 112,123 SF Size: 112,000 SF
Enter from External: Total Internal External Demand Balanced Demand Total Internal External Enter from External:30 Enter 30 0 30 1.0% 0 0 1.0% 3 Enter 310 28 282.08 28232 Exit 32 0 32 Exit 336 30 305.92 306
Exit to External: Total 62 0 62 Total 646 58 588 Exit to External:% 100% 0% 100% Demand Balanced Demand % 100% 9% 91%
1.0% 0 0 1.0% 3
NET EXTERNAL TRIPS FOR MULTI-USE DEVELOPMENT
Land UseA B C Total
Single Family DetachedChurch/SynagogueGeneral Commercial510 30 282 822289 32 306 627799 62 588 1,449
857 62 646 1,565File Name = k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\[trip gen iota carol.xls]ic_pm 6.77% 0.00% 8.98%Print Date = 12/28/15Print Time = 2:37 PM Internal Capture = 7.41%
EnterExitTotal
Single Use Trip Gen Estimate
ITE MULTI-USE PROJECT INTERNAL CAPTURE WORKSHEET(ITE, Chapter 7, Trip Generation Handbook , 2nd Edition, June 2004)
Task Number:
Land Use A:
Land Use B:
Category
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc
APPENDIX D: YEAR 2040 MPO MODEL VOLUME OUTPUT DATA
Stat
ion
Road
way
From
ToO
wne
r
Cos
tFe
asib
leLa
nes
Obs
erve
d20
05C
ount
s
Obs
erve
d20
10C
ount
s
Obs
erve
d20
14C
ount
s20
40LR
TPA
djus
ted
Volu
me
2040
SER
PM7
Adj
uste
dVo
lum
e46
772N
DAV
EN
WLa
keW
orth
Rd
Con
gres
sAv
ePB
C2
7,29
55,
594
6,25
69,
300
7,80
046
792N
DAV
EN
WC
ongr
ess
Ave
Bout
wel
lRd
PBC
25,
816
4,12
74,
517
9,10
07,
300
6890
4TH
AVE
(NW
)4
Dia
gona
lNW
Palm
etto
Par
kR
dB
R2
8,50
78,
306
10,6
6010
,100
8,30
068
264T
HA
VE(N
W)
Gla
des
Rd
4D
iago
nalN
WB
R2
8,68
18,
558
9,81
39,
700
10,5
0068
204T
HA
VE(N
W)
20th
StN
WG
lade
sR
dB
R2
7,63
18,
853
9,94
38,
600
10,1
0068
424T
HA
VE(S
W)
Palm
etto
Par
kR
dC
amin
oR
eal
BR
26,
108
6,00
67,
489
9,90
07,
600
6894
5TH
AVE
NE
Fede
ralH
wy
Sof
Fede
ralH
wy
BR
26,
834
5,97
17,
323
7,80
06,
900
6892
5TH
AVE
NW
Span
ish
Riv
erBl
vdN
W20
thSt
BR
25,
875
6,39
08,
422
13,5
009,
800
4631
6TH
AVE
SC
ongr
ess
Ave
Suns
etA
vePB
C4D
31,6
0428
,972
29,4
8040
,600
39,0
0042
056T
HA
VES
Suns
etA
veI-9
5PB
C4D
32,1
2537
,165
33,1
9539
,600
45,9
0043
076T
HA
VES
I-95
SR80
5(D
ixie
Hw
y)PB
C4D
27,9
9026
,868
27,8
9635
,900
33,2
0068
409T
HA
VE(S
W)
Palm
etto
Par
kR
dSW
13th
St
BR
22,
929
2,23
22,
412
2,20
03,
700
6883
10TH
AVE
Gla
des
Rd
NW
15th
StB
R2
8,93
56,
615
10,3
0810
,400
7,90
046
4310
THA
VEN
Jog
Rd
Hav
erhi
llR
dPB
C4D
16,9
4014
,782
14,2
7221
,700
23,3
0046
0110
THA
VEN
Hav
erhi
llR
dM
ilitar
yTr
PBC
521
,367
21,8
19N
/A25
,600
27,9
0046
0310
THA
VEN
Milit
ary
TrKi
rkR
dPB
C5
27,8
3726
,022
26,7
0535
,200
35,1
0046
5310
THA
VEN
Kirk
Rd
Con
gres
sAv
ePB
C5
33,1
3130
,129
31,9
9642
,800
39,6
0042
0310
THA
VEN
Con
gres
sAv
eI-9
5PB
C5
42,8
1044
,530
44,4
4150
,500
53,9
0043
0310
THA
VEN
I-95
'A'S
tPB
C5
33,6
4830
,251
33,2
5238
,900
33,2
0048
0510
THA
VEN
'A'S
tU
S1
PBC
521
,903
20,1
4921
,813
23,6
0021
,900
6896
12TH
AVE
Cam
ino
Gar
dens
Blv
d18
thS
tSW
BR
28,
052
6,77
67,
705
11,0
008,
300
6856
12TH
AVE
Palm
etto
Par
kR
d13
thS
tSW
BR
211
,579
10,6
0614
,119
17,5
0012
,700
6830
12TH
AVE
Nof
Pal
met
toPa
rkR
dPa
lmet
toP
ark
Rd
BR
421
,072
18,1
7521
,863
22,8
000
4309
12TH
AVE
S'A
'Ave
Lake
Osb
orne
Dr
LW2
6,41
76,
042
5,31
46,
600
6,60
068
2913
THS
TG
lade
sR
d10
thA
veN
WB
R4D
16,5
5612
,815
13,6
0718
,800
14,2
0068
9815
THA
VEG
lade
sR
dN
W7t
hSt
BR
213
,332
13,3
8415
,758
15,8
0013
,500
4301
17TH
AVE
N'A
'Ave
NPi
netre
eLn
LW2
1,86
31,
701
1,58
92,
200
2,20
068
1920
THS
T5t
hA
veN
WFA
UB
R4D
5,87
86,
695
9,02
13,
200
7,80
068
2320
THS
TU
S1
Old
Dix
ieH
wy
BR
4D11
,679
10,8
6512
,128
12,0
0010
,900
5621
23R
DAV
EM
ilitar
yTr
EC
ount
ryR
dPB
C2
11,4
1011
,294
11,6
4012
,000
13,0
0056
1723
RD
AVE
EC
ount
ryR
dC
ongr
ess
Ave
PBC
213
,036
13,0
5013
,698
14,0
0015
,100
5603
23R
DAV
EC
ongr
ess
Ave
I-95
PBC
214
,227
13,3
4113
,562
15,0
0016
,000
5305
23R
DAV
EI-9
5Se
acre
stB
lvd
PBC
215
,920
14,5
0612
,827
16,5
0016
,900
5811
23R
DAV
ESe
acre
stB
lvd
US-
1PB
C2
9,25
48,
556
8,63
89,
100
10,2
0038
0525
THS
TTa
mar
ind
Ave
Aust
ralia
nAv
eW
PB
210
,898
N/A
N/A
13,1
0013
,200
3803
36TH
ST
Broa
dway
(WPB
)Au
stra
lian
Ave
WP
B2
9,47
8N
/AN
/A11
,200
6,80
032
0145
THS
TJo
gR
dH
aver
hill
Rd
PBC
25,
839
4,39
25,
322
24,7
009,
700
3607
45TH
ST
Hav
erhi
llR
dM
ilitar
yTr
PBC
6D27
,729
24,8
9226
,349
45,2
0040
,600
3665
45TH
ST
Milit
ary
TrVi
llage
Blvd
PBC
6D44
,965
39,0
9639
,648
59,6
0053
,700
3203
45TH
ST
Villa
geBl
vdI-9
5PB
C6D
52,8
8055
,134
59,1
0967
,300
72,6
0033
0145
THS
TI-9
5C
ongr
ess
Ave
PBC
8D56
,431
53,3
3355
,715
67,0
000
3843
45TH
ST
Con
gres
sAv
eAu
stra
lian
Ave
PBC
6D47
,616
42,3
6744
,996
51,7
0050
,100
3801
45TH
ST
Aust
ralia
nAv
eG
reen
woo
dAv
ePB
C4D
30,5
2925
,475
26,9
9728
,900
26,5
0038
4545
THS
TG
reen
woo
dAv
eBr
oadw
ay(W
PB)
PBC
315
,819
12,7
1713
,442
15,0
0014
,800
6748
1088
460
THST
Sem
inol
eP
ratt
Whi
tney
Rd
140t
hAv
eN
PBC
2N
/AN
/AN
/A10
,900
9,20
062
1582
ND
STC
ongr
ess
Ave
I-95
BR
4D21
,753
20,7
9323
,867
24,1
0026
,300
Palm
BeachMPO
2040
CostFeasibleVo
lumes
10/14/20
15S:\LRT
P\20
40LRTP
\Mod
eling\Co
stFeasiblePlan
\204
0CF
Mod
elVo
lumes_S65_U
pdate_10
1315
.xlsx
Page
1of
20
Stat
ion
Road
way
From
ToO
wne
r
Cos
tFe
asib
leLa
nes
Obs
erve
d20
05C
ount
s
Obs
erve
d20
10C
ount
s
Obs
erve
d20
14C
ount
s20
40LR
TPA
djus
ted
Volu
me
2040
SER
PM7
Adj
uste
dVo
lum
e12
06C
EN
TRA
LBL
VD
Don
ald
Ros
sR
dFr
eder
ick
Smal
lRd
PBC
4D15
,708
16,6
8216
,806
32,8
0030
,800
1614
CE
NTR
AL
BLV
DFr
eder
ick
Smal
lRd
Indi
anC
reek
Pkw
yPB
C4D
10,9
5412
,750
13,2
5025
,400
21,9
0016
06C
EN
TRA
LBL
VD
Indi
anC
reek
Pkw
yIn
dian
tow
nR
dPB
C4D
27,2
1726
,285
23,6
9930
,200
19,8
0016
12C
EN
TRA
LBL
VD
Indi
anto
wn
Rd
Chu
rch
St
PBC
219
,245
13,0
3415
,331
20,8
0015
,800
6403
CLI
NT
MO
OR
ER
DSR
7Ly
ons
Rd
PBC
4D13
,291
15,1
4816
,612
17,8
0018
,000
6201
CLI
NT
MO
OR
ER
DLy
ons
Rd
Jog
Rd
PBC
4D21
,809
21,5
2523
,563
27,1
0029
,500
6607
CLI
NT
MO
OR
ER
DJo
gR
dM
ilitar
yTr
PBC
4D29
,949
28,7
6730
,162
38,7
0034
,500
6601
CLI
NT
MO
OR
ER
DM
ilitar
yTr
Con
gres
sAv
eB
R6D
30,7
3729
,298
26,1
5133
,800
32,6
0063
01C
LIN
TM
OO
RE
RD
Con
gres
sAv
eN
W2n
dAv
eB
R4D
13,7
1210
,637
11,0
2514
,700
11,1
0021
04C
OC
ON
UT
BLVD
Pers
imm
onBl
Ora
nge
BlPB
C2
3,98
62,
791
2,83
34,
400
4,20
024
12C
OC
ON
UT
BLVD
Ora
nge
BlTe
mpl
eBl
vdPB
C2
13,3
6510
,796
11,1
8110
,900
12,8
0024
04C
OC
ON
UT
BLVD
Tem
ple
Blvd
Nor
thla
keBl
vdPB
C2
14,1
0411
,665
11,6
327,
700
13,4
0036
41C
OM
MU
NIT
YD
RH
aver
hill
Rd
Milit
ary
TrPB
C5
16,2
0615
,110
13,8
3916
,200
17,9
0036
59C
OM
MU
NIT
YD
RM
ilitar
yTr
Villa
geBl
vdPB
C3
17,2
0415
,076
16,6
9821
,100
16,7
0066
14C
ON
GR
ESS
AVE
Yam
ato
Rd
Clin
tMoo
reR
dB
R6D
25,1
9825
,740
26,1
2532
,800
31,3
0066
44C
ON
GR
ESS
AVE
Clin
tMoo
reR
dN
W82
ndSt
BR
6D28
,805
28,3
0031
,979
41,3
0033
,900
6204
CO
NG
RE
SSAV
EN
W82
ndSt
Lint
onBl
vdB
R6D
24,6
6517
,757
19,8
4032
,600
25,9
0056
50C
ON
GR
ESS
AVE
Lint
onBl
vdLo
wso
nBl
vdPB
C6D
26,9
6523
,248
24,0
5633
,600
30,0
0056
12C
ON
GR
ESS
AVE
Low
son
Blvd
Atla
ntic
Ave
PBC
6D30
,312
26,1
5127
,833
36,0
0030
,900
5630
CO
NG
RE
SSAV
EAt
lant
icAv
eLa
keId
aR
dPB
C6D
32,6
6232
,658
32,9
8942
,300
38,1
0056
02C
ON
GR
ESS
AVE
Lake
Ida
Rd
35th
Ave
SW
PBC
6D31
,948
29,7
4029
,551
41,2
0035
,300
5626
CO
NG
RE
SSAV
E35
thA
veSW
Gol
fRd
PBC
6D38
,852
34,3
3235
,615
50,7
0039
,600
5624
CO
NG
RE
SSAV
EG
olfR
dW
oolb
right
Rd
PBC
6D41
,510
35,6
2738
,169
51,1
0040
,500
5610
CO
NG
RE
SSAV
EW
oolb
right
Rd
Boyn
ton
Bea
chBl
vdPB
C6D
38,2
5932
,543
31,3
9548
,200
36,1
0056
58C
ON
GR
ESS
AVE
Boyn
ton
Bea
chBl
vdO
ldBo
ynto
nR
dPB
C6D
N/A
47,1
3939
,255
39,0
0055
,500
5206
CO
NG
RE
SSAV
EO
ldB
oynt
onR
dG
atew
ayB
lvd
PBC
6D48
,285
36,7
8839
,191
52,8
0044
,100
4610
CO
NG
RE
SSAV
EG
atew
ayB
lvd
Hyp
olux
oR
dPB
C6D
36,3
4828
,826
27,7
9238
,600
38,4
0046
00C
ON
GR
ESS
AVE
Hyp
olux
oR
dLa
ntan
aR
dPB
C4D
29,9
9325
,175
23,3
2733
,700
32,0
0046
24C
ON
GR
ESS
AVE
Lant
ana
Rd
JFK
Dr
FDO
T6D
41,8
1431
,730
33,3
5655
,300
49,1
0046
26C
ON
GR
ESS
AVE
JFK
Dr
6th
Ave
SFD
OT
6D44
,492
33,6
1534
,374
58,5
0053
,500
4622
CO
NG
RE
SSAV
E6t
hA
veS
Lake
Wor
thR
dFD
OT
6D43
,176
35,6
8238
,653
56,8
0053
,800
4620
CO
NG
RE
SSAV
ELa
keW
orth
Rd
Fren
chA
veFD
OT
6D45
,274
36,6
2236
,085
54,0
0047
,900
4604
CO
NG
RE
SSAV
EFr
ench
Ave
10th
Ave
NFD
OT
6D47
,387
39,7
6940
,836
60,6
0053
,200
4210
CO
NG
RE
SSAV
E10
thA
veN
Fore
stH
illBl
vdFD
OT
6D44
,674
36,6
8035
,570
55,0
0051
,700
3644
CO
NG
RE
SSAV
EFo
rest
Hill
Blvd
Sum
mit
Blv
dFD
OT
6D35
,421
29,7
0929
,533
46,1
0041
,800
3674
CO
NG
RE
SSAV
ESu
mm
itB
lvd
Gun
Clu
bR
dFD
OT
6D40
,820
34,4
5834
,957
48,4
0049
,000
3618
CO
NG
RE
SSAV
EG
unC
lub
Rd
Sout
hern
Blvd
FDO
T6D
44,5
1534
,224
33,2
6550
,100
42,9
0036
68C
ON
GR
ESS
AVE
Turn
age
Blvd
(PBI
A)Be
lved
ere
Rd
PBC
27,
890
5,62
54,
532
9,70
05,
300
3606
CO
NG
RE
SSAV
EBe
lved
ere
Rd
Oke
echo
bee
Blv
dPB
C4D
24,3
2816
,624
N/A
29,9
0021
,800
3305
CO
NG
RE
SSAV
EO
keec
hobe
eB
lvd
Palm
Beac
hLa
kes
Blvd
PBC
4D25
,375
16,8
3217
,469
28,9
0023
,400
3930
CO
NG
RE
SSAV
EPa
lmBe
ach
Lake
sBl
vdPr
esid
entia
lWay
PBC
529
,729
18,0
3517
,231
33,2
0027
,200
3928
CO
NG
RE
SSAV
EPr
esid
entia
lWay
45th
St
PBC
528
,624
17,4
2416
,245
32,1
0023
,400
2308
CO
NG
RE
SSAV
E45
thS
tM
LKBl
vdPB
C6D
34,4
1725
,403
21,5
0043
,100
36,9
0026
18C
ON
GR
ESS
AVE
MLK
Blvd
Blue
Her
onBl
vdPB
C4D
27,0
5518
,586
17,1
4128
,000
20,8
0026
22C
ON
GR
ESS
AVE
Blue
Her
onBl
vdSi
lver
beac
hR
dPB
C4D
24,3
98N
/A22
,502
41,0
0028
,400
2620
CO
NG
RE
SSAV
ESi
lver
beac
hR
dN
orth
lake
Blvd
PBC
4D25
,819
24,0
4724
,294
30,3
0033
,600
6368
1082
2C
ON
GR
ESS
AVE
Nor
thla
keBl
vdA
lt.A
1AP
BC2
N/A
N/A
N/A
17,3
0012
,000
7011
CR
-717
Stat
eM
arke
tRd
SR-7
29SR
-700
,US
-98
PBC
23,
171
N/A
2,41
55,
200
3,10
0
10/14/20
15S:\LRT
P\20
40LRTP
\Mod
eling\Co
stFeasiblePlan
\204
0CF
Mod
elVo
lumes_S65_U
pdate_10
1315
.xlsx
Page
5of
20
Stat
ion
Road
way
From
ToO
wne
r
Cos
tFe
asib
leLa
nes
Obs
erve
d20
05C
ount
s
Obs
erve
d20
10C
ount
s
Obs
erve
d20
14C
ount
s20
40LR
TPA
djus
ted
Volu
me
2040
SER
PM7
Adj
uste
dVo
lum
e26
00M
ILIT
ARY
TRL
Nor
thla
keBl
vdH
olly
Dr
FDO
T6D
43,9
9937
,391
41,0
5560
,400
41,6
0026
06M
ILIT
ARY
TRL
Hol
lyD
rPG
AB
lvd
FDO
T6D
44,3
5337
,111
38,8
1651
,200
42,9
0026
24M
ILIT
ARY
TRL
PGA
Blv
dI-9
5PB
C6D
38,8
8233
,368
35,0
1863
,600
39,9
0026
04M
ILIT
ARY
TRL
I-95
Hoo
dR
dPB
C6D
27,5
6424
,838
26,7
4647
,500
26,8
0022
08M
ILIT
ARY
TRL
Hoo
dR
dD
onal
dR
oss
Rd
PBC
6D23
,883
24,2
3324
,051
26,7
0032
,600
1602
MIL
ITAR
YTR
LD
onal
dR
oss
Rd
Fred
eric
kSm
allR
dPB
C6D
30,5
7234
,542
33,7
0941
,600
44,0
0016
08M
ILIT
ARY
TRL
Fred
eric
kSm
allR
dIn
dian
Cre
ekB
lvd
PBC
6D28
,570
30,3
0029
,553
36,4
0038
,500
1600
MIL
ITAR
YTR
LIn
dian
Cre
ekB
lvd
Indi
anto
wn
Rd
PBC
6D25
,419
24,3
2223
,597
29,4
0033
,300
4690
MIN
ERR
DC
ongr
ess
Ave
Hig
hR
idge
Rd
PBC
2N
/AN
/A6,
376
4,80
05,
200
6835
MIZ
NE
RBL
VD
US-
1(F
eder
alH
wy)
Palm
etto
Par
kR
dB
R4D
4,89
59,
033
10,2
017,
600
12,8
0068
34M
IZN
ER
BLV
DPa
lmet
toP
ark
Rd
Fede
ralH
wy
BR
4D10
,273
10,0
0110
,739
8,00
013
,200
2413
NO
RTH
LAKE
BLV
DSe
min
ole
Prat
tWhi
tney
Rd
140t
hAv
eN
PBC
411
,089
10,0
749,
872
19,5
0014
,500
2421
NO
RTH
LAKE
BLV
D14
0th
Ave
NC
ocon
utBl
vdPB
C4
N/A
N/A
16,2
7832
,200
29,5
0024
11N
OR
THLA
KEBL
VD
Coc
onut
Blvd
Ibis
Rd
PBC
4D29
,704
25,8
8929
,522
34,0
0034
,700
2407
NO
RTH
LAKE
BLV
DIb
isR
dBe
elin
eH
wy
PBC
4D36
,674
32,4
3133
,081
57,9
0050
,600
2401
NO
RTH
LAKE
BLV
DBe
elin
eH
wy
Ryd
erC
upBl
vdPB
C6D
23,9
4921
,045
22,6
8035
,300
26,3
0022
05N
OR
THLA
KEBL
VD
Ryd
erC
upBl
vdSt
eepl
echa
seD
r/B
alle
nisl
esD
rPB
C6D
34,2
8030
,702
30,7
0656
,100
46,6
0026
05N
OR
THLA
KEBL
VD
Stee
plec
hase
Dr/
Balle
nisl
esD
rM
ilitar
yTr
PBC
6D45
,285
N/A
42,6
2462
,300
46,5
0022
07N
OR
THLA
KEBL
VD
Milit
ary
TrI-9
5PB
C6D
51,9
8546
,823
51,4
0665
,400
59,4
0023
09N
OR
THLA
KEBL
VD
I-95
Con
gres
sAv
ePB
C6D
53,2
9254
,580
58,5
6563
,600
66,3
0028
15N
OR
THLA
KEBL
VD
Con
gres
sAv
eSR
811
PBC
6D44
,623
41,3
1545
,459
38,4
0043
,500
2821
NO
RTH
LAKE
BLV
DSR
811
Pros
perit
yFa
rms
Rd
PBC
6D31
,068
33,6
79N
/A33
,300
40,8
0028
17N
OR
THLA
KEBL
VD
Pros
perit
yFa
rms
Rd
Sout
hwin
dD
rPB
C6D
36,2
1432
,680
34,1
9938
,900
40,5
0028
19N
OR
THLA
KEBL
VD
Sout
hwin
dD
rU
S-1
PBC
6D27
,179
28,8
91N
/A29
,500
33,4
0058
01O
CEA
NAV
EFe
dera
lHw
yN
Oce
anB
lvd
SRA
1AFD
OT
26,
836
6,03
18,
713
7,30
06,
600
4803
OC
EAN
AVE
SRA
1AU
S-1
FDO
T2
17,7
3615
,418
13,1
6619
,000
15,8
0073
2473
60O
KEE
CH
OBE
EBL
VDS
R-8
0/C
R-8
80S
emin
ole
Pra
ttW
hitn
eyR
dP
BC2
N/A
N/A
N/A
5,50
02,
900
3419
OKE
ECH
OBE
EBL
VDSe
min
ole
Prat
tWhi
tney
Rd
140t
hPB
C4
12,5
208,
931
8,71
523
,500
14,2
0034
51O
KEEC
HO
BEE
BLVD
140t
hC
rest
woo
dBl
vdPB
C4
19,2
6015
,734
14,9
9330
,200
22,9
0034
11O
KEEC
HO
BEE
BLVD
Cre
stw
ood
Blvd
Roy
alPa
lmB
each
Blvd
PBC
6D36
,631
26,2
0027
,926
50,7
0038
,700
3453
OKE
ECH
OBE
EBL
VDR
oyal
Pal
mB
each
Blvd
Wild
catW
ayPB
C6D
63,1
2537
,519
43,4
4660
,700
49,0
0034
01O
KEEC
HO
BEE
BLVD
Wild
catW
aySR
-7PB
C8D
60,7
7838
,508
42,5
8660
,400
66,6
0034
03O
KEEC
HO
BEE
BLVD
SR-7
Sans
bury
'sW
ayFD
OT
8D51
,560
47,4
2149
,003
61,2
0056
,200
3441
OKE
ECH
OBE
EBL
VDSa
nsbu
ry's
Way
Beno
istF
arm
sR
dFD
OT
8D57
,338
45,4
7053
,637
73,3
0054
,200
3439
OKE
ECH
OBE
EBL
VDBe
nois
tFar
ms
Rd
Skee
sR
dFD
OT
8D61
,364
51,1
1057
,937
80,0
0057
,900
3449
OKE
ECH
OBE
EBL
VDSk
ees
Rd
Jog
Rd
FDO
T8D
66,4
8652
,669
60,5
4788
,800
60,6
0031
03O
KEEC
HO
BEE
BLVD
Jog
Rd
Flor
ida
Turn
pike
FDO
T8D
74,4
2751
,444
60,6
4398
,500
53,9
0032
07O
KEEC
HO
BEE
BLVD
Flor
ida
Turn
pike
Hav
erhi
llR
dFD
OT
8D70
,171
61,0
2565
,684
94,0
0073
,100
3671
OKE
ECH
OBE
EBL
VDH
aver
hill
Rd
Milit
ary
TrFD
OT
8D72
,815
63,9
5668
,211
107,
900
72,2
0036
33O
KEEC
HO
BEE
BLVD
Milit
ary
TrPa
lmBe
ach
Lake
sBl
vdFD
OT
8D76
,634
71,3
6471
,313
94,1
0075
,900
3603
OKE
ECH
OBE
EBL
VDPa
lmBe
ach
Lake
sBl
vdC
ongr
ess
Ave
FDO
T8D
55,2
2646
,833
50,6
6068
,900
55,2
0032
09O
KEEC
HO
BEE
BLVD
Con
gres
sAv
eI-9
5FD
OT
8D64
,108
59,6
5761
,035
89,7
0068
,700
3307
OKE
ECH
OBE
EBL
VDI-9
5Au
stra
lian
Ave
FDO
T8D
66,0
4772
,803
73,4
2310
9,60
060
,600
3813
OKE
ECH
OBE
EBL
VDAu
stra
lian
Ave
Tam
arin
dA
veFD
OT
8D60
,094
64,9
7467
,947
106,
800
70,5
0038
37O
KEEC
HO
BEE
BLVD
Tam
arin
dAv
eD
ixie
Hw
yFD
OT
8D48
,094
40,9
6746
,717
75,9
0049
,100
5639
OLD
BO
YNTO
NR
DM
ilitar
yTr
Law
renc
eR
dPB
C5
18,8
8015
,193
15,7
5028
,000
18,6
0056
27O
LDB
OYN
TON
RD
Law
renc
eR
dC
ongr
ess
Ave
PBC
523
,624
16,9
6218
,627
29,9
0020
,200
5629
OLD
BO
YNTO
NR
DC
ongr
ess
Ave
Boyn
ton
Bea
chBl
vdPB
C2
13,3
81N
/A14
,452
15,4
0016
,100
10/14/20
15S:\LRT
P\20
40LRTP
\Mod
eling\Co
stFeasiblePlan
\204
0CF
Mod
elVo
lumes_S65_U
pdate_10
1315
.xlsx
Page
14of
20
Stat
ion
Road
way
From
ToO
wne
r
Cos
tFe
asib
leLa
nes
Obs
erve
d20
05C
ount
s
Obs
erve
d20
10C
ount
s
Obs
erve
d20
14C
ount
s20
40LR
TPA
djus
ted
Volu
me
2040
SER
PM7
Adj
uste
dVo
lum
e63
10O
LDD
IXIE
HW
YBr
owar
dC
ount
yLi
neSW
18th
St
BR
4D16
,673
15,2
7317
,498
37,8
0021
,100
6872
OLD
DIX
IEH
WY
SW18
thS
tC
amin
oR
eal
BR
4D20
,247
19,0
0823
,805
30,0
0026
,600
6870
OLD
DIX
IEH
WY
Cam
ino
Rea
lPa
lmet
toP
ark
Rd
BR
4D23
,207
21,2
1923
,258
33,4
0026
,900
6900
OLD
DIX
IEH
WY
Palm
etto
Par
kR
dG
lade
sR
dB
R5
22,0
4917
,962
22,0
0131
,000
25,3
0068
66O
LDD
IXIE
HW
YG
lade
sR
dN
E20
thSt
BR
4D19
,172
17,8
6122
,030
25,2
0022
,600
6860
OLD
DIX
IEH
WY
NE
20th
StSp
anis
hR
iver
Blvd
BR
4D18
,905
17,3
4618
,286
22,9
0019
,200
6862
OLD
DIX
IEH
WY
Span
ish
Riv
erBl
vdYa
mat
oR
dB
R4D
17,5
1815
,769
16,7
6117
,100
16,7
0063
04O
LDD
IXIE
HW
YLi
ndel
lBlv
dH
idde
nVa
lley
Blvd
BR
312
,946
11,9
8612
,760
16,0
0015
,200
3302
OLD
DIX
IEH
WY
45th
St
MLK
JrBl
vdW
PB
417
,011
11,4
6511
,721
19,7
0012
,800
2810
OLD
DIX
IEH
WY
MLK
Blvd
Blue
Her
onBl
vdPB
C5
16,4
0711
,520
13,1
8817
,800
12,4
0028
08O
LDD
IXIE
HW
YBl
ueH
eron
Blvd
Silv
erbe
ach
Rd
PBC
4D17
,101
13,6
6716
,387
17,4
0016
,100
1806
OLD
DIX
IEH
WY
SR-8
11/B
each
Rd
Tequ
esta
Dr
PBC
413
,863
12,2
5712
,771
14,3
0018
,900
1814
OLD
DIX
IEH
WY
Tequ
esta
Dr
Cou
nty
Line
Rd
PBC
26,
712
8,11
26,
898
6,90
09,
700
3308
OLI
VE
AVE
SW
PBC
ityLi
mit
Alha
mbr
aPl
WP
B2
10,2
637,
044
6,72
89,
300
7,60
039
26O
LIV
EAV
EAl
ham
bra
PlFo
rest
Hill
Blvd
NO
N2
N/A
N/A
N/A
5,50
02,
600
3910
OLI
VE
AVE
Fore
stH
illBl
vdEs
sex
LnW
PB
211
,041
N/A
N/A
7,20
050
038
92O
LIV
EAV
EEs
sex
LnSo
uthe
rnBl
vdW
PB
212
,025
N/A
N/A
7,70
01,
600
3880
OLI
VE
AVE
Sout
hern
Blvd
Mon
roe
Dr
WP
B2
9,87
04,
446
N/A
5,60
04,
800
3868
OLI
VE
AVE
Mon
roe
Dr
Belv
eder
eR
dPB
C2
8,90
74,
334
N/A
6,30
04,
600
3864
OLI
VE
AVE
Belv
eder
eR
dO
keec
hobe
eB
lW
PB
214
,435
3,90
8N
/A17
,700
4,30
038
48O
LIV
EAV
EO
keec
hobe
eB
lBa
nyan
Blv
dW
PB
213
,932
N/A
N/A
15,1
0011
,800
3836
OLI
VE
AVE
Bany
anB
lvd
Lofti
nSt
WP
B2
10,1
915,
109
3,07
713
,500
6,30
038
30O
LIV
EAV
ELo
ftin
StPa
lmBe
ach
Lake
sBl
vdFD
OT
25,
943
2,95
52,
644
7,50
06,
000
2417
OR
ANG
EB
LVD
Sem
inol
ePr
attW
hitn
eyR
d14
0th
Ave
NPB
C2
N/A
7,29
27,
987
10,0
006,
800
2409
OR
ANG
EB
LVD
140t
hAv
eN
Coc
onut
Blvd
PBC
28,
513
8,08
98,
168
9,80
011
,400
2415
OR
ANG
EB
LVD
Coc
onut
Blvd
Roy
alPa
lmB
each
BlPB
C2
13,6
8912
,613
13,1
2012
,400
14,5
0036
01P
ALM
BEA
CH
LAKE
SBL
VDO
keec
hobe
eB
lvd
Villa
geBl
vdPB
C6D
37,5
2631
,840
33,8
1039
,100
36,8
0032
05P
ALM
BEA
CH
LAKE
SBL
VDVi
llage
Blvd
I-95
PBC
6D60
,062
49,8
5853
,359
66,6
0054
,800
3303
PAL
MBE
AC
HLA
KES
BLVD
I-95
PBM
allM
ain
Entra
nce
PBC
6D56
,760
43,9
8655
,446
64,4
0063
,700
3809
PAL
MBE
AC
HLA
KES
BLVD
PBM
allM
ain
Entra
nce
Con
gres
sAv
ePB
C6D
46,7
6141
,485
45,0
0752
,700
49,2
0038
47P
ALM
BEA
CH
LAKE
SBL
VDC
ongr
ess
Ave
Aust
ralia
nAv
ePB
C6D
46,2
8339
,526
40,5
7461
,800
47,4
0038
11P
ALM
BEA
CH
LAKE
SBL
VDAu
stra
lian
Ave
Tam
arin
dA
vePB
C4D
34,0
5529
,121
31,0
1237
,100
32,0
0038
07P
ALM
BEA
CH
LAKE
SBL
VDTa
mar
ind
Ave
Dix
ieH
wy
PBC
4D20
,954
22,2
2023
,513
23,4
0025
,500
6431
PAL
ME
TTO
PAR
KR
DG
lade
sR
dPo
nder
osa
Dr
PBC
4D14
,533
12,4
5314
,030
19,3
0013
,200
6409
PAL
ME
TTO
PAR
KR
DPo
nder
osa
Dr
SR-7
PBC
4D25
,341
20,3
7021
,872
32,7
0023
,300
6405
PAL
ME
TTO
PAR
KR
DSR
-7Ly
ons
Rd
PBC
6D37
,111
30,3
5829
,747
34,7
0033
,500
6425
PAL
ME
TTO
PAR
KR
DLy
ons
Rd
Boca
Rio
Rd
PBC
6D47
,481
42,3
9141
,885
47,9
0047
,700
6211
PAL
ME
TTO
PAR
KR
DBo
caR
ioR
dPo
wer
line
Rd
PBC
6D57
,918
47,5
9947
,837
59,9
0064
,200
6617
PAL
ME
TTO
PAR
KR
DPo
wer
line
Rd
StA
ndre
ws
Blv
dPB
C6D
55,1
8447
,704
47,2
6259
,500
51,0
0066
09P
ALM
ETT
OPA
RK
RD
StA
ndre
ws
Blv
dM
ilitar
yTr
PBC
6D58
,273
52,2
4451
,342
68,3
0053
,000
6209
PAL
ME
TTO
PAR
KR
DM
ilitar
yTr
I-95
PBC
6D62
,369
56,3
8458
,997
72,3
000
6309
PAL
ME
TTO
PAR
KR
DI-9
512
thS
tPB
C6D
57,1
5556
,810
56,0
1562
,300
19,5
0068
71P
ALM
ETT
OPA
RK
RD
12th
St
Boca
Rat
onBl
vdB
R4D
38,1
6634
,777
37,6
9739
,900
35,0
0068
73P
ALM
ETT
OPA
RK
RD
Boca
Rat
onBl
vdO
ldD
ixie
Hw
yB
R4D
31,1
2530
,915
29,4
8735
,700
35,9
0068
75P
ALM
ETT
OPA
RK
RD
Old
Dix
ieH
wy
Fede
ralH
wy
BR
4D16
,266
20,3
6720
,798
20,1
0024
,700
6877
PAL
ME
TTO
PAR
KR
DFe
dera
lHw
yN
E5t
hAv
eB
R4D
17,9
6915
,668
14,3
2519
,900
17,5
0068
03P
ALM
ETT
OPA
RK
RD
NE
5th
Ave
ICW
WBr
idge
BR
4D14
,853
14,6
6213
,533
13,9
0015
,700
6817
PAL
ME
TTO
PAR
KR
DIC
WW
Brid
geA1
APB
C4D
15,1
1914
,135
15,0
6713
,400
14,4
00
10/14/20
15S:\LRT
P\20
40LRTP
\Mod
eling\Co
stFeasiblePlan
\204
0CF
Mod
elVo
lumes_S65_U
pdate_10
1315
.xlsx
Page
15of
20
Stat
ion
Road
way
From
ToO
wne
r
Cos
tFe
asib
leLa
nes
Obs
erve
d20
05C
ount
s
Obs
erve
d20
10C
ount
s
Obs
erve
d20
14C
ount
s20
40LR
TPA
djus
ted
Volu
me
2040
SER
PM7
Adj
uste
dVo
lum
e13
10P
ALM
WO
OD
AVE
Fred
eric
kSm
allR
dD
onal
dR
oss
Rd
PBC
25,
991
4,14
73,
437
8,40
04,
300
2833
PAR
KAV
EFe
dera
lHw
y10
THSt
PBC
26,
645
5,60
85,
431
12,6
007,
900
5431
1004
9PA
RK
AVE
Con
gres
sAv
eO
ldD
ixie
Hw
yP
BC2
N/A
N/A
N/A
12,6
0011
,400
3902
PAR
KER
AVE
Fore
stH
illBl
vdSu
mm
itB
lvd
WP
B2
7,11
1N
/AN
/A8,
800
12,0
0038
96P
ARKE
RAV
ESu
mm
itB
lvd
Sout
hern
Blvd
WP
B4
14,7
31N
/AN
/A13
,100
10,0
0038
72P
ARKE
RAV
ESo
uthe
rnBl
vdBe
lved
ere
Rd
WP
B4
9,95
7N
/AN
/A10
,100
8,40
038
56P
ARKE
RAV
EBe
lved
ere
Rd
Oke
echo
bee
Blv
dW
PB
419
,454
N/A
N/A
11,3
0020
,200
6908
1002
5PE
RSI
MM
ON
BLV
DS
emin
ole
Pra
ttW
hitn
eyR
d14
0th
Ave
NP
BC4
N/A
N/A
N/A
7,40
07,
000
3447
PER
SIM
MO
NB
LVD
130t
hAv
eN
Roy
alPa
lmB
each
BlPB
C2
7,62
15,
874
5,97
719
,700
024
05P
GA
BLV
DBe
eLi
neH
wy
Ryd
erC
upBl
vd(J
ogR
d)FD
OT
45,
801
3,47
93,
518
11,7
005,
600
2103
PG
ABL
VD
Ryd
erC
upBl
vd(J
ogR
d)Fl
orid
aTu
rnpi
keFD
OT
4D24
,751
22,9
9525
,572
35,0
0029
,400
2201
PG
ABL
VD
Flor
ida
Turn
pike
Cen
tralB
lvd
FDO
T6D
46,8
4845
,217
43,6
2768
,900
61,7
0026
09P
GA
BLV
DC
entra
lBlv
dM
ilitar
yTr
FDO
T6D
47,7
9344
,296
47,2
7854
,900
47,0
0022
03P
GA
BLV
DM
ilitar
yTr
I-95
FDO
T6D
49,3
4246
,147
49,9
0156
,700
46,1
0023
03P
GA
BLV
DI-9
5SR
811
FDO
T8D
61,7
6159
,950
69,3
7961
,400
72,5
0028
29P
GA
BLV
DSR
811
Gar
dens
Mal
lFD
OT
6D57
,253
51,6
7754
,625
77,3
0072
,500
2805
PG
ABL
VD
Gar
dens
Mal
lPr
ospe
rity
Farm
sR
dFD
OT
6D44
,137
38,0
7641
,536
46,4
0038
,500
2803
PG
ABL
VD
Pros
perit
yFa
rms
Rd
Ellis
onW
ilson
Rd
FDO
T6D
45,6
6739
,880
39,7
9448
,900
41,0
0028
37P
GA
BLV
DEl
lison
Wils
onR
dFe
dera
lHw
yFD
OT
6D30
,962
26,4
7026
,974
36,7
0028
,500
3448
PIK
ER
DSo
uthe
rnBl
vdFl
aTu
rnpi
keE
ntra
nce
PBC
413
,697
14,3
9215
,116
22,1
0025
,500
3450
PIK
ER
DFl
aTu
rnpi
keE
ntra
nce
Belv
eder
eR
dPB
C2
5,74
54,
703
5,63
87,
100
9,80
042
14P
INE
TREE
LNFo
rest
Hill
Blvd
Kelle
rRd
PBC
22,
383
2,38
22,
253
2,90
02,
900
4662
PIN
EHU
RST
DR
10th
Ave
NLa
keW
orth
Rd
PBC
210
,323
8,78
99,
014
10,1
0011
,000
4202
PIN
EHU
RST
DR
Fore
stH
illBl
vd10
THAv
eN
PBC
210
,475
9,27
69,
579
12,2
0011
,800
5657
PIP
ER
SG
LEN
BLV
DEl
Cla
irR
anch
Rd
Milit
ary
TrPB
C2
5,86
95,
429
5,28
49,
800
7,20
038
14P
OIN
SET
TIA
AVE
36TH
St25
THSt
WP
B2
4,72
5N
/AN
/A5,
400
5,80
038
06P
OIN
SET
TIA
AVE
45th
St36
thSt
WP
B2
11,1
88N
/AN
/A12
,300
3,50
038
00P
OIN
SET
TIA
AVE
45TH
StN
End
WP
B2
2,83
7N
/AN
/A3,
900
3,90
083
0810
057
POLO
RD
Lake
Wor
thR
dLy
ons
Rd
PBC
2N
/AN
/AN
/A15
,400
14,3
0064
23P
ON
DE
RO
SAD
RG
lade
sR
dPa
lmet
toP
ark
Rd
PBC
24,
734
4,30
73,
945
5,80
05,
100
6625
PO
TOM
ACR
DJo
gR
dSt
And
rew
sB
lvd
BR
4D7,
812
7,24
28,
190
16,3
0013
,700
6623
PO
TOM
ACR
DSt
And
rew
sB
lvd
Milit
ary
TrBR
410
,902
9,99
911
,365
17,7
0013
,600
6210
PO
WER
LIN
ER
DBr
owar
dC
ount
yLi
neSW
18th
St
FDO
T4D
37,0
25N
/A34
,347
50,8
0042
,800
6632
PO
WER
LIN
ER
DSW
18th
St
Cam
ino
Rea
lFD
OT
4D35
,270
N/A
31,2
7045
,100
30,1
0066
26P
OW
ERLI
NE
RD
Cam
ino
Rea
lPa
lmet
toP
ark
Rd
FDO
T4D
43,5
55N
/A44
,561
50,5
0037
,900
6622
PO
WER
LIN
ER
DPa
lmet
toP
ark
Rd
Suns
tream
Blv
dFD
OT
4D29
,310
N/A
28,2
7434
,100
22,2
0066
02P
OW
ERLI
NE
RD
Suns
tream
Blv
dG
lade
sR
dFD
OT
4D31
,736
N/A
24,4
0738
,900
31,8
0014
02P
RAT
T-W
HIT
NE
YR
DIn
dian
tow
nR
dBe
eLi
neH
wy
PBC
23,
556
4,22
84,
726
16,4
0011
,100
1104
PR
ATT-
WH
ITN
EY
RD
Indi
anto
wn
Rd
Mar
tinC
ount
yLi
nePB
C2
2,71
12,
994
3,36
87,
900
6,60
028
06P
RO
SPE
RIT
YFA
RM
SR
DN
orth
lake
Blvd
Ligh
thou
seD
rPB
C3
19,1
9917
,866
17,4
1218
,800
18,3
0028
36P
RO
SPE
RIT
YFA
RM
SR
DLi
ghth
ouse
Dr
Burn
sR
dPB
C3
20,6
0417
,850
17,1
5020
,900
19,2
0028
04P
RO
SPE
RIT
YFA
RM
SR
DBu
rns
Rd
PGA
Blv
dPB
C5
27,9
3127
,164
26,8
8631
,300
28,5
0028
02P
RO
SPE
RIT
YFA
RM
SR
DPG
AB
lvd
Hoo
dR
dPB
C4D
17,8
5018
,843
19,9
8726
,100
22,0
0023
02P
RO
SPE
RIT
YFA
RM
SR
DH
ood
Rd
Don
ald
Ros
sR
dPB
C2
11,6
729,
970
8,56
914
,400
11,0
0046
37P
UR
DY
LNJo
gR
dH
aver
hill
Rd
PBC
27,
532
8,53
67,
210
7,40
010
,600
4639
PU
RD
YLN
Hav
erhi
llR
dM
ilitar
yTr
PBC
213
,248
9,58
310
,321
15,9
0012
,600
3938
QU
ADR
ILLE
BLV
DO
keec
hobe
eB
lvd
Fern
St
WP
B4
9,89
5N
/AN
/A-3
,700
21,7
0039
36Q
UAD
RIL
LEBL
VD
Fern
StC
lem
atis
StW
PB
414
,807
N/A
N/A
21,8
009,
300
3934
QU
ADR
ILLE
BLV
DC
lem
atis
StSR
-5W
PB
414
,089
N/A
N/A
20,3
0010
,300
2831
RC
ABL
VD
AltA
1APr
ospe
rity
Farm
sR
dPB
C2
10,0
909,
138
9,86
510
,500
10,7
0016
11R
OEB
UC
KR
DLo
xaha
tche
eR
iver
Rd
Cen
tralB
lvd
PBC
28,
579
5,47
75,
200
7,90
05,
800
10/14/20
15S:\LRT
P\20
40LRTP
\Mod
eling\Co
stFeasiblePlan
\204
0CF
Mod
elVo
lumes_S65_U
pdate_10
1315
.xlsx
Page
16of
20
Stat
ion
Road
way
From
ToO
wne
r
Cos
tFe
asib
leLa
nes
Obs
erve
d20
05C
ount
s
Obs
erve
d20
10C
ount
s
Obs
erve
d20
14C
ount
s20
40LR
TPA
djus
ted
Volu
me
2040
SER
PM7
Adj
uste
dVo
lum
e60
9566
65R
OEB
UC
KR
DS
R-7
Jog
Rd
PBC
4N
/AN
/AN
/A19
,400
15,8
0031
07R
OEB
UC
KR
DJo
gR
dH
aver
hill
Rd
PBC
418
,602
17,9
1318
,539
21,9
0028
,400
3681
RO
EBU
CK
RD
Hav
erhi
llR
dM
ilitar
yTr
ail
PBC
2N
/A8,
588
9,39
015
,900
11,0
0034
12R
OYA
LPA
LMBE
ACH
BLV
DSo
uthe
rnBl
vdO
keec
hobe
eB
lvd
RPB
215
,190
15,9
1113
,527
18,3
0017
,500
3410
RO
YAL
PALM
BEAC
HBL
VD
Oke
echo
bee
Blv
dR
PBN
orth
City
Lim
itsR
PB4D
38,0
6722
,123
21,3
8427
,600
23,0
0034
26R
OYA
LPA
LMBE
ACH
BLV
DR
PBN
orth
City
Lim
itsM
Can
alPB
C4D
32,7
2216
,753
14,0
3027
,800
22,0
0024
02R
OYA
LPA
LMBE
ACH
BLV
DM
Can
alO
rang
eBl
vdPB
C4
17,1
1315
,825
15,9
3219
,400
19,2
0038
19R
OYA
LPA
LMBR
IDG
EC
ount
yR
dO
live
Ave
FDO
T4D
22,9
2520
,023
29,2
6530
,300
18,0
0038
33R
OYA
LPO
INC
IAN
AW
AYN
Flag
lerD
rR
oyal
Poi
ncia
naW
yFD
OT
424
,543
15,1
22N
/A38
,800
13,5
0034
14S
ANSB
UR
YSW
AYSo
uthe
rnBl
vdBe
lved
ere
Rd
PBC
25,
869
9,20
011
,970
10,4
0011
,900
3454
SAN
SBU
RYS
WAY
Belv
eder
eR
dO
keec
hobe
eB
lPB
C2
4,80
37,
691
6,83
59,
400
8,10
058
02S
EAC
RE
STBL
VD
23rd
Ave
Woo
lbrig
htR
dPB
C5
22,5
5421
,073
20,5
6625
,000
22,0
0058
00S
EAC
RE
STBL
VD
Woo
lbrig
htR
dBo
ynto
nB
each
Blvd
PBC
517
,989
13,9
8211
,793
23,2
0019
,400
5302
SEA
CR
EST
BLV
DBo
ynto
nB
each
Blvd
Gat
eway
Blv
dPB
C5
14,7
9512
,733
11,4
2315
,800
15,7
0048
06S
EAC
RE
STBL
VD
Gat
eway
Blv
dH
ypol
uxo
Rd
PBC
514
,029
11,6
3711
,046
16,7
0015
,500
3420
SEM
INO
LEP
RAT
T-W
HIT
NE
YR
DSo
uthe
rnBl
vdO
keec
hobe
eB
lvd
PBC
4D18
,769
14,3
5113
,400
22,3
0020
,400
3424
SEM
INO
LEP
RAT
T-W
HIT
NE
YR
DO
keec
hobe
eB
lvd
Syca
mor
eD
rEPB
C4
22,3
7717
,383
N/A
39,0
0019
,800
3442
SEM
INO
LEP
RAT
T-W
HIT
NE
YR
DSy
cam
ore
DrE
60TH
STN
PBC
4D18
,742
16,6
20N
/A38
,100
23,0
0024
08S
EMIN
OLE
PR
ATT-
WH
ITN
EY
RD
60TH
STN
Ora
nge
BlPB
C4D
14,6
4614
,772
N/A
28,6
0020
,500
2406
SEM
INO
LEP
RAT
T-W
HIT
NE
YR
DO
rang
eBl
Nor
thla
keBl
vdPB
C4
15,7
8111
,076
10,4
6031
,000
21,3
0010
0271
0029
SEM
INO
LEPR
ATT
-WH
ITN
EYR
DN
ofN
orth
lake
Blvd
SR
-710
PBC
2N
/AN
/AN
/A15
,500
8,30
046
44S
HER
WO
OD
FOR
EST
BLV
DLa
keW
orth
Rd
10th
Ave
NPB
C2
7,67
75,
767
7,69
98,
100
9,70
046
54S
HER
WO
OD
FOR
EST
BLV
D10
thA
veN
Cre
stha
ven
Blv
dPB
C2
9,09
57,
736
8,62
29,
700
10,6
0042
00S
HER
WO
OD
FOR
EST
BLV
DC
rest
have
nB
lvd
Fore
stH
illBl
vdPB
C2
7,43
46,
348
6,75
19,
100
9,20
026
15S
ILVE
RBE
AC
HR
DC
ongr
ess
Ave
Old
Dix
ieH
wy
PBC
3N
/A13
,508
13,4
906,
900
12,8
0028
07S
ILVE
RBE
AC
HR
DO
ldD
ixie
Hw
yU
S-1
PBC
313
,451
11,5
9111
,939
17,1
0013
,600
3418
SKE
ESR
DO
keec
hobe
eB
lBe
lved
ere
Rd
PBC
25,
651
4,95
64,
663
10,2
006,
500
3446
SO
UTH
SHO
RE
DR
Lake
Wor
thR
dG
reen
view
Shor
esBl
WEL
218
,874
16,2
7116
,739
20,2
0018
,300
3429
SO
UTH
SHO
RE
DR
Gre
envi
ewSh
ores
BlBi
gBl
ueTr
ace
WEL
4D20
,318
18,4
7021
,697
21,5
0020
,100
3421
SO
UTH
SHO
RE
DR
Big
Blue
Trac
eFo
rest
Hill
Blvd
WEL
4D26
,822
23,8
3826
,986
29,0
0026
,200
3101
SO
UTH
ERN
BLV
DC
R88
0Li
onC
ount
ryS
afar
iFD
OT
4D17
,567
19,7
0215
,321
24,7
0034
,100
3467
SO
UTH
ERN
BLV
DLi
onC
ount
ryS
afar
iSe
min
ole
Prat
tWhi
tney
Rd
FDO
T6D
N/A
22,4
9020
,081
36,5
0053
,500
3443
SO
UTH
ERN
BLV
DSe
min
ole
Prat
tWhi
tney
Rd
Bink
sFo
rest
Driv
eFD
OT
6D37
,182
28,6
3029
,957
62,9
0045
,700
3431
SO
UTH
ERN
BLV
DBi
nks
Fore
stD
rive
Big
Blue
Trac
eFD
OT
6D35
,256
35,3
0533
,674
60,2
0056
,300
3413
SO
UTH
ERN
BLV
DBi
gBl
ueTr
ace
Fore
stH
ill/C
rest
woo
dFD
OT
6D45
,385
46,8
8146
,540
65,2
0072
,100
3417
SO
UTH
ERN
BLV
DFo
rest
Hill/
Cre
stw
ood
Cyp
ress
Hea
dFD
OT
6D42
,335
54,3
0357
,966
68,9
0073
,700
3437
SO
UTH
ERN
BLV
DC
ypre
ssH
ead
Roy
alPa
lmB
each
Blvd
FDO
T6D
45,3
5253
,158
59,0
3675
,500
71,3
0034
05S
OU
THER
NB
LVD
Roy
alP
alm
Bea
chBl
vdLa
mst
ein
LnFD
OT
8D48
,779
N/A
N/A
84,1
0080
,400
3409
SO
UTH
ERN
BLV
DLa
mst
ein
LnSR
-7FD
OT
8D51
,263
65,8
9772
,235
88,7
0080
,600
3415
SO
UTH
ERN
BLV
DSR
7Sa
nsbu
ry's
Way
FDO
T8D
38,8
5461
,147
69,5
3577
,500
75,8
0031
05S
OU
THER
NB
LVD
Sans
bury
'sW
ayPi
keR
dFD
OT
8D43
,644
62,0
1072
,910
90,2
0084
,200
9307
49S
OU
THER
NB
LVD
Pike
Rd
Fla
Turn
pike
Ent
ranc
eFD
OT
8D45
,951
56,7
49N
/A17
,700
82,4
0032
23S
OU
THER
NB
LVD
Fla
Turn
pike
Ent
ranc
eJo
gR
dFD
OT
8D39
,180
56,8
5867
,154
75,6
0067
,400
3643
SO
UTH
ERN
BLV
DJo
gR
dH
aver
hill
Rd
FDO
T8D
32,6
5861
,432
75,7
5538
,300
72,6
0036
35S
OU
THER
NB
LVD
Hav
erhi
llR
dM
ilitar
yTr
FDO
T8D
30,8
8464
,446
N/A
38,9
0078
,600
3637
SO
UTH
ERN
BLV
DM
ilitar
yTr
Kirk
Rd
FDO
T8D
26,9
6167
,701
69,1
1951
,300
84,6
0036
73S
OU
THER
NB
LVD
Kirk
Rd
Con
gres
sAv
eFD
OT
8D33
,449
58,7
5264
,701
55,7
0069
,700
3639
SO
UTH
ERN
BLV
DC
ongr
ess
Ave
SBC
ongr
ess
Ave
NB
FDO
T8D
53,5
84N
/AN
/A67
,200
27,9
0036
75S
OU
THER
NB
LVD
Con
gres
sAv
eN
BG
emLa
keFD
OT
8D53
,584
58,3
49N
/A46
,500
68,5
0032
17S
OU
THER
NB
LVD
Gem
Lake
I-95
FDO
T8D
31,2
9251
,969
59,9
8351
,300
48,1
0033
13S
OU
THER
NB
LVD
I-95
Park
erA
veFD
OT
8D30
,197
30,7
7631
,746
38,0
0034
,700
3823
SO
UTH
ERN
BLV
DPa
rker
Ave
Dix
ieH
wy
FDO
T5
22,1
6022
,301
23,0
1025
,400
24,1
0038
25S
OU
THER
NB
LVD
Dix
ieH
wy
Flag
lerD
rFD
OT
513
,377
11,5
9513
,044
17,2
0010
,900
3827
SO
UTH
ERN
BLV
DFl
agle
rDr
Oce
anB
lvd
FDO
T2
14,5
0412
,830
13,6
3415
,700
11,9
0066
05S
PAN
ISH
RIV
ER
BLVD
Milit
ary
TrIB
MAc
cess
BR4
24,6
1822
,574
25,6
0728
,200
22,6
0063
05S
PAN
ISH
RIV
ER
BLVD
IBM
Acce
ssPe
rimet
erR
dB
R4
22,7
7623
,173
26,5
0721
,000
22,4
0068
11S
PAN
ISH
RIV
ER
BLVD
Perim
eter
Rd
Old
Dix
ieH
wy
BR4D
21,4
9119
,254
22,5
0533
,600
21,8
00
10/14/20
15S:\LRT
P\20
40LRTP
\Mod
eling\Co
stFeasiblePlan
\204
0CF
Mod
elVo
lumes_S65_U
pdate_10
1315
.xlsx
Page
17of
20
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc
APPENDIX E: DATA FROM OTHER APPROVED / PENDING PROJECTS(MINTO WEST, AVENIR, INDIAN TRAILS GROVE)
Exhibit 2A Minto West Daily Trip Generation
West Side
Land Use
Residential - SF Residential - MF Apts. Residential - MF Condos. Residential- 55+ Detached Residential- 55+ Attached General Office Research & Devel. Retail Park
TOTALS
East Side
Land Use Residential- SF (N,O,T,U) Residential - SF IF,M,P,Q,R,Si
Residential - MF Condos. Residential - MF Apts. Hotel Community College General Office Research & Devel. Light Industrial Retail Park Community Center Church Daycare
TOTALS
ITE Code Intensity
210 - DUs 220 - DUs 230 150 DUs 251 300 DUs 252 200 DUs 710 150,000 SF 760 425,000 SF 820 350,000 SF 412 125 Acres
ITE Code Intensity
210 1,010 DUs 210 2,436 DUs 230 450 DUs 220 - DUs 310 150 Rooms
540* 3,000 Students 710 300,000 SF 760 175,000 SF 110 450,000 SF 820 150,000 SF 412 67 Acres 495 70,000 SF 560 70,000 SF 565 10,000 SF
Internal Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips Trips (2)
10 /DU - - 26.2% 6.65 /DU - - 26.2% 6.65 /DU 998 261 26.2%
8/DU 2,400 629 26.2% 6/DU 1,200 314 26.2%
Ln (T) = 0.77Ln (X)+3.65 1,823 179 9.8% Ln (T) = 0.83Ln (X)+3.09 (3) 3,338 327 9.8%
Ln (T) = 0.65Ln (X)+5.83 1 5,331 767 5.0% 2.28 /Acre 285 29 10.0%
25,375 2,506 9.9%
Internal Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips Trips (2)
10 /DU 10,100 1,192 11.8% 10 /DU 24,360 2,874 11.8%
6.65 /DU 2,993 353 11.8% 6.65 /DU - - 11.8% 8.92 /Room 1,338 591 44.2% 2.29 /Student 6,870 1,594 23.2%
Ln (T) = 0.77Ln (X)+3.65 3,109 432 13.9% Ln (T) = 0.83Ln (X)+3.09 (3) 1,598 222 13.9%
6.97 /1000 SF 3,137 436 13.9% Ln (T) = 0.65Ln (X)+5.83 8,839 4,172 47.2%
2.28 /Acre 153 47 30.5% 33.82 /1000 SF 2,367 722 30.5%
9.11 /1000 SF 638 195 30.5% 74.06 /1000 SF 741 226 30.5%
66,243 13,056 19.7%
External Interzonal Trips Trips (4)
- - 0.0%
- - 0.0% 737 84 11.4%
1,771 211 11.9% 886 103 11.6%
1,644 106 6.4% 3,011 195 6.5%
14,564 2,222 15.3% 256 19 7.4%
22,869 2,940 11.6%
External Interzonal Trips Trips (2)
8,908 481 5.4% 21,486 1,182 5.5%
2,640 145 5.5% . - 0.0% 747 64 8.6%
5,276 343 6.5% 2,677 110 4.1% 1,376 63 4.6% 2,701 111 4.1% 4,667 397 8.5%
106 - 0.0% 1,645 26 1.6%
443 12 2.6% 515 6 1.2%
53,187 2,940 4.4%
Trip Gen +Internal 13-013 8-7-14 4546+2M+PC
8/13/2014
External Pass-by Trips Trips (1) New Trips
- - 0% -- . 0% -653 - 0% 653
1,560 - 0% 1,560 783 - 0% 783
1,538 154 10% 1,384 2,816 282 10% 2,534
12,342 3,542 28.7% 8,800J 237 - 0% 2371
19,929 3,978 15,951 I
External Pass-by Trips Trips (1) New Trips
8,427 - 0% 8,427 20,304 - 0% 20,304
2,495 - 0% 2,495 - - 0% -683 68 10% 615
4,933 - 0% 4,933 2,567 257 10% 2,310 1,313 131 10% 1,182 2,590 259 10% 2,331 4,270 1,563 36.6% 2,707
106 - 0% 106 1,619 81 5% 1,538
431 22 5% 409 509 255 SO% 254
50,247 2,636 47,611
(COMBINED TOTALS I 91,618 I 15,562 I 17.0%1 76,056 I 5,880 I 6.4%1 70,176 I 6,614 I I 63,562 I
• Rate obtained from Palm Beach State College trip generation study by Kimley-Horn. See Appendix B.
111 Source: Palm Beach County ULDC Article 13, unless otherwise noted.
121 Utilized average of individual AM and PM peak hour internalization rates.
131 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation 9th Edition.
141 Utilized average of individual AM and PM peak hour internalization rates with adjustments to balance with the east side interzonal trips.
[ P~ernalization: 23:4%]
0
~ 2%
SYCAMORE DRIVE --:J
[ - 5 MILE RADIUS 32%1
22%
3%
I -1
2% 1%
1%
3%
0.5%
I 15.5% 16% 16% 200/o 22.5%
16%1
20%1
23%
0 > > 1.5% ~ 0.5% ~
~ r
2% 1% ---~----
TEMPLE BLVD
0.5% 0.5%
3% 2% ORANGE BOULEVARD
5%
05~
4.5%1
2.5% I
0 ~
0%
NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD
0 ~
4%
3% ~ 2% 0.5%1; 0 < u 0 ~
13%
0.5%
u
~
11% ~ if 8%
6% 0.5%
~ 60th STREET N
2.5%
12% I 10.5%
_PERSIMMON l~~o 4o/o 4% 13
_5%
----------'~- .5% -Q~5o/o 3.5% ORANGE GROVE BLVD ~~ 1m
3.5%
13.5%
10% 9.5% 9% I 6% 6% 6.5%
0 :: .;'0.5% 8 1%
19%
t 5%
0.5°A § 15.5% 11.5% 11.5%
0
3% ROEBUCK ROAD
~ 0.5% ~
~ z
1% ~ 1%
100/o 9%
PCA BOULEVARD
5%
3% 3%
9% 5% 1% N.T.S.
3%
1% 0
2 00/o
\)
Q
0.5% ROEBUCK I ROAD
0
1% I~ I o.5%l 0.5% Q
2%
6.5° 5% OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
1%
00/o -I BELVEDERE ROAD
5% SOUTHERN BOULEVARD
- 4%/~ 01 2%1:;; ,,,. P'' ::: 5·5 '• B/12/14
0
~
~ ~ ~ I I I 13-013
1.--__ M_I_N_r_o_w-Es-r-~;:______,·1 I PROJEi~~~~~R~~uTJoN IIPTci
Avemr Concurrency Traffic Study
2.2.1 Trip Generation
Project trip generation was based on the rates published in the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards (TPS). Rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 9th Edition were used when TPS rates were not available. Trip generation data from
Northwood University and Palm Beach State College were used to calculate the trip generation for
the proposed University at Avenir.
2.2.2 Internal Capture
In terms capture refers to the satisfaction of trips within the project. In other words, some trips generated by mixed-use projects do not exit the project or enter the major roadway system. Lnternal
traffic was estimated based on the methodology of the Transportation Research Board (TRB)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 684. This methodology estimates morning and afternoon peak- period trips to and from six specific land use categories:
office, retail, restaurant, residential, cinema, and hotel.
2.2.3 Pass-by Trips
Some trips generated by the non-residential uses are from existing traffic passing the proposed
project and are not newly generated trips. Credit against the trip generation of the proposed project
was taken for these trips up to the percentage shown in Article 13, Tmpact Fees. or the ITE Manual. Pass-by traffic does not exceed 25% of the adjacent street traffic.
A summary of the project trip generation analysis including internal capture and pass-by trips is shown in Table 2. Detailed analysis is provided in Appendix C. Based on the project, net, new external trips the Radius of Development Lnfluence (RDI) for this analysis is five miles.
Table 2 Project Trip Generation Summary
Scenario AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Daily In Out Total %Internal In Out Total %Internal
ITE Trip Generation 78,697 3,304 2,866 6,170 3,425 4,693 8, 118
NCHRP Internal -16, 185 1 -20.8% -587 -588 -1,175
-1 9.0% -897 -896 -1,793 -22.1%
Pass-by -4,341 1 -5.3% -226 -36 -262 -4.2% -185 -366 -551 -6.8%
Net New External Trip 58,171 2,491 2,242 4,733 2,343 3,431 5,774 Difftrtnct
Page -l
I 5 I 0 OS
. . I 0 '· . .
PJ{~),r~ r LiH .\l i t) .
IJ 0
. . 0 :o !:? _, .. . "' -.
~--____::::...;_..:.:...._~-+-:-:-t----.- ..... . I 0 I 5
0 c ..
.... rt
"' "' 0
Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., Inc. Traffic Eng1neering, Transportation Planning
969 SE Federal H1ghway Suite 402 Stuart. Flonda 34994
Tel. 772-781-7918
6
10
10
3.0
0 "' - 0
FIGURE- 2
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
AVENIR
e NORTH
APRIL 16, 2015
INDIAN TRAILS GROVE
TEST 2 - TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS
TABLE 11 - Dailv Traffic Generation
~ Lanciluse .. ~t .. . . ., ~~;."t;•
-~f~~~~l:l;ilt!~!il Singie Family Detached 2i0 I 500 !Dwelling Units 10
J Grand Totals:
TABLE 12- AM Peak Hour T1raffic Generation ITE ~>r::· ....
Lanf.tuse Code lntem_sity RatetE~.u:atien Single Family Detached 210 500 !Dwelling Units 0.75
I Grand Totals:
TABLE.13- PM Peak Hour Traffic Generation I'I!E ,. ··: ,..
Land.use e~ ln_ten'i~V. Rate,f;E,qu~ti~JI' Singie t-amily Detached 2i0 500 !Dwelling Units Ln(T) - 0.90 Ln(X) + 0.51
I Grand Totals:
Dir~Sptit !
' l019~~-I
Dlrspnt ·. ' ln I Out o.25 I o.75
D.iiSJOJit In t O!Jt:
o.63 1 o.37
"•"il;::•o:
07/15/2015 Revised 08/28/2015
Qt.~~~ Trips 5,000
5,000
Gress Trips In Out Total 94 281 375
94 281 375
· Gross Trips • · l.m 0§J-t Total 282 165 447
282 165 447
~:~ocuments\PROJECTS\2014114.096 GL WesfiConcurreny T raffle Study_August.2015 Submittatllndian Trails Grove Traffic RSIMM()~TE
~~!5! ::::J5VI~
(.)
~
@ PROJECT DISTRIBUTION
L_j 2-MILE RADIUS OF DEVELOPMENT INFLUENCE
SIMMO~ITE ENBINUIIINI I nANIIINil I C:ONIULTINB I SINCE 1882.
AuthorfzGtlon No. 3452 2581 M.tr-ttre Blvd w..t•Sulta 3•Wnt Palm Beach, florldo .»407• (5111) 478-~
§ §..., § 8 NORlHl.AKE Cl ...J ...... Cl BOULEVARD
~I§ ~ =>
~® ~ => => TEMPLE ~ BOULEVARD ~
§ ® ~ i!:
® ® .~ ORANGE ®..J BOULEVARD !3 aJjs z
0 (.) 0 ~ (.)
60TH STREET
s PERSIMMON BOULEVARD
MINTO WEST
SYCAMORE DRIVE I
@
~IS§ c.. 30%
II§ SOUTHERN
@
!>2!ii~ za:::a::: ii3f2C>
@ § 5i! OKEECHOBEE 0 ~
BOULEVARD a::: a::: ID ......
8 BOULEVARD
FIGURE 5 PROJECT DISTRIBUTION-TEST 2 ANALVSIS (5-YEAR BVILDOUT - 500 SF HOMES)
Cl
~ !ill §
Cl 0
~I® a::: (.)
Cl
~~ -::. 0 ID
INDIAN TRAILS GROVE 14-096 BK 07-15-15
REVISED 08-28-15
N
4 N.T.S.
TEST 2 • FIVE YEAR BULDOUT (2020) 2 MILE RADIUS' AREAWIDE GROWTH RATE= TOT<ll. AM PEAK HOUR PRo.ECT TRIPS (ENTERING) •
·-·..-. .. .... .-'"'--~·· ¥ -
;:.-~?~7j~if;t~' . 1r ···' . ,., . ;~ ...
\;~
RONJWAY FROM
60TH STREET SITE
NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD TEMPLE BOULEVARD ORANGE BOULEVARD
60TH STREET SEMlNOLE PRA IT WHITNEY ROAD
PERSIMMON BOULEVARD
SYCAMORE DRIVE
OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD SEMINOLE PRA IT WHITNEY ROAD
OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD BROAD FROAO
NORTHLAKE BOULEV ARC SEMlNOLE PRA IT W HITNEY ROAD
Notes:
3.03% 94 ...
TO
' <,:.,
SEMINOLE PRATI WHITNEY"'
TEMPLE BOULEVARD ORANGE BOULEVARD 60TH STREET
PERSIMMON BOULEVARD
SYCAMORE DRIVE
OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
SOUTHERN BOULEVARD BROAD
' ROAD'"
140TH AVENUE
(1) Tote! BackorOI..nd Trame equals 11M h~ d lhe erea wide g10¥fth rl!lteu ,,., beci<.Qround ;f"OIIIIIIth plus CctMiitftld trips fmdudW'Ia Minto Wnt). (2) M'nb West buildout is 2035. (3) Due to the~~ buildout, this segment CCJ'Isidered unlnWuppb!d floN
(4)CcluntsderiwedfrDrl'ltumingmcMif1'l«ltCCli.Jnt (5) TobeccnMI'V81foM, lhemafor pn:lject lrlfr.;-~asaumed lobe lhe- • ful bulldoutwi1h lhetllCI:eplion dMinloWesl
·1;,
DIIU;GTIOH
EB ' WB
NB NB NB NB SB NB SB NB SB SB EB EB EB EB
X:\Documents\PROJECTS\2014\1 oH>98 GL Wnt\Ca~eurreny Tr.tftc Sludy_August.2015 Submlit81\lndian Trill Is GrOY8 Trefflc Repctt AUQU&t.2011S B.K.
INDIAN TRAILS GROVE
WbUZ AM PEAK HOUR· TEST 2
2015 AM~: . ·:~:-.··; ••. FUU ·>;·. P=~ :;•''·: .,, 0.5% ·e· ( All PEAK :'i>;
HOUR PBQJECT PROJECT MAJOR MINTO i_': TRAFFIC"' . BACKGROU_ND
TRN:FIC1 DISTRIBI:IJIOH TRJiiS PROJECif'0 TRAFFIC ' 51201 .. , TRAFFIC
306 100'11 281 0 0 0 8 99 100'11 94 0 0 0 2
508 25'11 70 211 364 91 13 508 25'11 70 29 456 114 13 664 30'11 64 21 615 154 17 656 70'11 66 21 729 182 22 793 70'11 197 19 783 191 20 856 70'11 66 21 006 227 22 793 70'11 197 19 666 217 20 633 70'11
•'. 66 21 787 197 16
951 70'11 197 19 752 188 24 861 30% 84 150 501 125 22 530 30'11 64 1 228 57 13 530 30'11 84 1 216 54 13 860 30'11 84 34 205 51 22 781 25'11 70 305 364 91 20
= ~:: " i TOTAL WIDE ·' BACKGROUND
GROWTH ~(I)
50 50 16 16 83 133 83 156
109 192 140 225 130 230 140 270 130 256 104 234 156 231 141 2117 87 87 87 87
141 141 128 416
07{1~15
Re'o'ised 08.12812015
2020 •
BCKOD ;~:- 2020 ~.~.-~ TRAFJ;IC ' ' TOTAL "ASSURED
~;rf~~~~- ~~~~TS WIO PR(i)J TRAFFIC
356 837 ' 115 209 641 711 664 734 658 940
1061 1146 1023 1220 1126 1191 1049 1246 667 933 1182 1379 1158 1242 617 701 617 701
1001 1065 1197 1267
LANES CI:ASS LOSE
2 I 880 2 I 880
4D I 1960 40 I 1960 40 I 1960 40 II 1870 40 ' II 1870 40 I 1960 40 I 1960 40 VUNI • 2700 40 1/UNI • 2700 40 I 1960 2 I 880 2 UNI 1440 2 UNI 1440
40 I 1960
0. SI.'-IMc.>Ns.:..~·wurn: -~:·:.·.;;·::·::.-.; ·;:· .. :·;. :: :,,·,;;
STD.
.. YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
TEST 2 • FIVE YEAR BUILDOUT (2020} 2 MILE RADIUS AREAWIDE GROWTH RATE= TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIPS•(ENTERING}• TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIPS (EXITING) •
. . ; ~, ·-·--:'~: , ... ··!_ • ._, wi;
3.08% 282 185
INDIAN TRAILS GROVE
TABLE18 PM PEAK HOUR • TEST 2
?r:~,- : PM2~ :-:·~~-;~~~;-~_~-:·.:_4,~ p:~~:\.~!;:~-~~;:,;~-~~,~~ FULL p= ~~;~ 0.5% ;-:.~,X~-1 !Roae: ~~~~~ TOTAL ~-~-~# a:Z:o -~f! 2020 ~:{':~lU•"'
0711512015 R8Yised0812812015
"'.-..~ .. , ....
ROADWAY FROM ll , ·· "··'· H0,UR • PROJECT PROJECT ·~ MAJOR ~--~ MINTO TRAFFICPI BACKGROUND • WIDE BACKGROUND i. TRAFFIC '' TOTAL ASSURED
TO DIRECTION TRAFFIC IISTRIBUTIDI TRIPS PROJECl'" TRAFFIC · (5120} TRAFFIC GROWTH TRAFFIC111 WID PROJ TRAFFIC LANES CLASS
· >~~ ;1!·:;:;, MEETS
• LOS LOSE STD.
60TH STREET
SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD
OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD
Notes:
SITE ' ' SEMINOLEPRATTWHITNEY''1 ~~ r- ~:~ -;= . ;-:-~:_---~g-- :, g ·. g- : ~-' :- ~- ~ ----:-.: ~ .,,_ ,,, ~~ ·: ~ · ~ ··- . : - = ~~ NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD TEMPLE BOULEVARD SB 527 25% 71 45 456 114 13 66 172 699 770 40 1 1960 YES TEMPLE BOULEVARD ORANGE BOULEVARD SB 527 25% 71 45 456 114 13 66 172 699 770 40 1 1960 · YES ORANGE BOULEVARD 60TH STREET SB 665 30% 65 76 616 154 17 109 247 912 996 4D I 1960 YES
60TH STREET PERSIMMON BOULEVARD ·• ~~ ~~ ~: ' ;~~ ~~ ~ ~~ c - •' I ~~ ;~ ;;~ ' ; ~~ ' · ;~~~ :g :: , ~:~g ~~~ PERSIMMON BOULEVARD I NB T 870 70% 197 76 667 217 22 142 315 1165 1382 4D I 1960 YES
iSYCAMORE DRIVE SB 626 70% 116 76 1007 252 16 103 344 970 1085 4D I 1960 YES
SYCAMORE DRIVE
OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
SOUTHERN BOULEVARD
'SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD jB ROAD
'ROAD(!)
•LE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD (140TH AVENUE
NB 1035--7~--,w------120 753 188 ... 26 --11o----~- 1369 1567 40 1/UNI 2700 YES SB 545 70% 116 108 675 219 -· 14 69 341 688 1001 4D 1/UNI 2700 YES NB 640 35% 99 227 502 126 21 138 374 1214 1313 4D I 1960 YES EB 307 --~ _50 _____ 1 -- ---y65-------e6 .-· 8 50 75 382 431 2 I 880 YES WB 528 30% 65 1 228 57 " ' 13 66 66 814 699 2 I 880 YES WB 528 30% 65 1 217 54 13 86 86 614 699 2 UNI 1440 YES WB =t 750 30% 65 86 205 51 19 - ---~ 156 906 991 2 UNI 1440 YES WB 726 25% 71 387 365 91 18 119 496 1222 1293 4D I 1960 YES
(1) TotGi Background Tr.rHc equais the higher d !he aree 'Nido gro....th rate or 1% background grCJNth plus c<rnmitled trips (Including Mrtto West). (2) Mhto Wast buildout is 2035. (3) t:lu8 to the 5-year bUJidout, ltlis &eglflWit comk:IEII"''!!d ~Stlnteruppted flow (4) Cc:I.Jnts detiwcl from turning n"!CMMmenl count (5) To becmserv.rtlve, the fNior project tratl\c was assumed to be the scme as fi.AI bulldoul wtth the excep(k:ln d Minto Wasl
X:\Doc..ment.s\PROJECTS\2014\14-096 Gl West\Ccncurmny Traffic Sludy_Augusl2015 Subm\ttal\1ndan Trails Gro>.te Tnrft'lc Report August.2015 B.K. ~!~~~~)~'-P~
INDIAN TRAILS GROVE LUPA TRAFFIC STUDY
TABLE 1 - Daily Traffic Generation
10
Single Family Detached 210 1,314 Dwelling Units 10
Single Family Detached 210 ~.315 Dwelling Units 10
Church/Synagogue 560 42,689 S.F. 9.11
Gen. Commercial 820 225,000 S.F. Ln(T) = .65 Ln(X) + 5.83
Grand Totals:
TABLE 2 - AM Peak Hour Traffic Generation ..
, . ·f:· :··>s: :~" :'.'.i ~. :t~&-;~t;;~···rr~~}.@:fE ,~.\: .:;~,\ }:~· ITE ;~};:ir~:;.~'· lntensit~···~i ,~ >t~ ;~·~~- ''·1~'1 R~te/E~uati~~ :)t0j~}~3i
Dir Split .•. Land use ·· ·b··· ... ··"·· Code In Out Single Family Detached 210 1,314 Dwelling Units 0.75 0.25 0.75
Single Family Detached 210 1,314 Dwelling Units 0.75 0.25 0.75
Single Family Detached 210 1,315 Dwelling Units 0.75 0.25 0.75
Church/Synagogue 560 42,689 S.F. 0.56 0.62 0.38
Gen. Commercial 820 225,000 S.F. 0.96 0.62 0.38
Grand Totals:
TABLE 3 - PM Peak Hour Traffic Generation ..
''''·?~! ··. · ··· . ITE ~~; 1\.•Pv! Intensity < · .. · .. ;c\~0.: .. ~?~ ·.~g• " ' "1J~~:~ Dir Split
Land use Code· Rate/Equation In Out Single Family Detached 210 1,314 Dwelling Units Ln(T) = 0.90 Ln(X) + 0.51 0.63 0.37
Single Family Detached 210 1,314 Dwelling Units Ln(T) = 0.90 Ln(X) + 0.51 0.63 0.37
Single Family Detached 210 1,315 Dwelling Units Ln(T) = 0.90 Ln(X) + 0.51 0.63 0.37
Church/Synagogue 560 42,689 S.F. 0.55 0.48 0.52
Gen. Commercial 820 225,000 S.F. Ln(T) = 0.67 Ln(X) + 3.31 0.48 0.52
Grand Totals:
X:\Documents\PROJECTS\2014\14-096 GL West\LUPA Traffic Study_07.16.15 Resubmittal\lndian Trails_Lupa_07.16.15 B.K.
13,140
13,140
13,150
389
11,504
51,323
06/01/2015 Revised: 07/16/2015
Gross Trips ., In \• Out Total 246 740 986
246 740 986
246 740 986
15 9 24
134 82 216
887 2,311 3,198
Gross Trips •.;., In
672
672
673
11
495
2,523
Out Total 395 1,067
395 1,067
395 1,068
12 23
537 1,032
1,734 4,257
~ SIMMO~S'&wt-ITE '"'1-.lll!l'lllt: 1 ••o~~~"ltiJ 1 ta~t:u ~r4 ttt•.· t t.illiltf Itt~
INDIAN TRAILS GROVE LUPA TRAFFIC STUDY
TABLE 4- Dailv Traffic Generation ITE
Land use Code Single Family Detached 210
-------~---
Church/Synagoguec 560 42,689 389 389
Gen. Commercial 820 225,000 S.F. 11,504 1,741 9,763
Grand Totals: 51,323 3,482 47,841
TABLE 5 - AM Peak Hour Traffic Generation ITE
~- , Intensity '"~;f~lt~ Gross Trips Internalization '!f~.~c ·,··-' External Trips
··. Landuse Code , In ' Out Total % ;·.: ~ In ''· Out Total In Out Total Single Family Detached 210 3,943 Dwelling Units 738 2,220 2,958 1.1% 11 22 33 727 2,198 2,925
-·---- ·--Church/Synagogue 560 42,689 S.F. 15 9 24 0.0% 0 0 0 15 9 24 Gen. Commercial 820 225,000 S.F. 134 82 216 15.3% 22 11 33 112 71 183
Grand Totals: 887 2,311 3,198 2.1% 33 33 66 854 2,278 3,132
TABLE 6- PM Peak Hour Traffic Generation ITE lnte~~ity . '), ,·;}~,\:;! , Gross Trips ~":Zl,lnternalization ~:;~~: - . External Trips
Land use Code In Out Total Yo ' In ''' Out Total In Out Total Single Family Detached 210 3,943 Dwelling Units 2,017 1,185 3,202 7.7% 183 64 247 1,834 1,121 2,955
Church/Synagogue 560 42,689 S.F. 11 12 23 0.0% 0 0 0 11 12 23
Gen. Commercial 820 225,000 S.F. 495 537 1,032 23.9% 64 183 247 431 354 785
Grand Totals: 2,523 1,7~ 4,257- __1!.6% 247 247 494 2,265 1,475 3,740
Notes:
06/01/2015 Revised: 07/16/2015
0.0% 0
15.3% 1,764 7,999
3.4% 1,764 46,077
;;r~; :,, Local Capture"' ~,,, ,,,~,~; In > Out Trips
~·· Net Trips I
In '' Out Total 0.0% 0 0 0 727 2198 2925
0.0% 0 0 0 15 9 24 11.6% 16 9 25 96 62 158 0.8% 16 9 25 838 2,269 3,107
~ft- ~\Locr~ ~a~~;e<1 lT;:~~\ Net Trips ·: :.:. In · Out Total
0.0% 0 0 0 1834 1121 2955 0.0% 0 0 0 11 12 23 19.1% 51 146 197 380 208 588
4.6% 51 146 197 2,225 1,341 3,566
(1) Local capture indicates the trip interaction between the Indian Trails commercial use and the residential lots west of Seminole Pratt Whitney Road and north of 60th Street North. A modified internal capture calculation was conducted to estimate these trips. (2) Net trips indicate trips that travel to the external thoroughfare roadway network (Seminole Pratt Whitney Road).
X:\Documents\PROJECTS\2014\14-096 GL West\LUPA Traffic Study_07.16.15 Resubmittal\lndian Trails_Lupa_07.16 .15 B.K.
~~.~, ' - ~- - '\, SIMMONS('\. WHITE
t~J.HIHIIi\111 I ·~~~'ll~lltl I tll"f\ll,t>IU I 11 .. 4:t 191~
z~~®@ @ lMI.L ~lnll'i
® :W~Q 3SVHO::Ilc1331S
®
®
L
a~A:nnos SIB I
a~A:nnos
®
®
®
® ®® ~
~ ® ® ®
co
~® ® @)
®
avo~ srnw.:1 lSIOH38
® AVM ~£18SNVS
~ ®~ ~
® ffi@ @) ~ ~ ~ "' :::>
~ ® a:: @) i:;j® ® CO N
31VlS
® ®~ AVM
lVOOliM ~ :::> 0
® @)
® co
l'ilVd ® a~A:nnos
® lVAml
OOOM!S3~o 0 a~A:nnos \!V lliH
® AVM>I~d lS3M Sl'ilVd 153!IO.:I
® ®
®
~ I~.NS
A!I!Nnoo NOn
3:M:U. 3n18 :>18
® :w~
lS3!!Ql S>INI8
w u z w
~ ~
!Z w
"' "-'3
z ~ 0 0
5 0 co !" (/}
::> V>
~ i'5
B ~
~~~
~
@ PROJECT DISTRIBUTION
SIMM~TE --·· ···---···-·-··--·-· ·~- · ~Hn•"• , ·•~n,.• - • , C~IOIIH!IIOI I i"tN CE, 1112
Author!~ lolc. 3452 2:581 ~ntr• 8"-d YtQl•S\IItll 3•w..t Polrn &.«h. F'l«<do 33407•(581) 478- 1848 (;;;'\
ASSIGNMENT REGIONAL PARK ~ e SITE ACCESS (22%) -@ ASSIGNMENT FUTURE Q Q NORTHLAKE BLVD
PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL '..:::y ~
* 15% OVERAUL MINTO WEST TRIP ASSIGNMENT
MINTO WEST
FIGURE 18 PROJECT DISTRIBUTION
HAMUN BLVD 18X _j I @ ,. ~X ...
§ ORANGE BLVD lJ:I _j
ax 1
1r .... 0 1r .... ""'
0 IDtPLE BLVD
@ ORANGE BLVD
@) jt(~ § OTH STREET
3ll_j~ 12,;-~ 32ll t ~MINTO WEST TRIP ASSIGNMENT
TOWN CENTER PARKWAY
~I§ § PERSit.lt.ION BOULEVARD
MINTO WEST TRIP ASSIGNMENTS
~ D..
~
~I§ Vl
J N.T.S.
INDIAN TRAILS GROVE 14-096 BK 07-1 5-1 5
ðêñðïñîðïëλª·»¼æ ðéñïêñîðïë
ROADWAY FROM
NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD -ORANGE BOULEVARD -
SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD 60TH STREET PERSIMMON BOULEVARD SYCAMORE DRIVE OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD
PERSIMMON BOULEVARD SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD 140TH AVENUE
60TH STREET SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD 140TH AVENUE SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD
ORANGE BOULEVARD 140TH AVENUE COCONUT BOULEVARD
ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD ORANGE BOULEVARD
COCONUT BOULEVARD NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD ORANGE AVENUE SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD
NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD 140TH AVENUE COCONUT BOULEVARD
ROADWAY FROM
NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD -ORANGE BOULEVARD -SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD
60TH STREET PERSIMMON BOULEVARD SYCAMORE DRIVE OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD
PERSIMMON BOULEVARD SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD 140TH AVENUE
60TH STREET SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD 140TH AVENUE SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD
ORANGE BOULEVARD 140TH AVENUE COCONUT BOULEVARD
ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD ORANGE BOULEVARD
COCONUT BOULEVARD NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD ORANGE AVENUE SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD
NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD 140TH AVENUE COCONUT BOULEVARD
Notes:
INDIAN TRAILS GROVE LUPA TRAFFIC STUDY
TABLE 7 (YEAR 2040)
MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY- NET INCREASE
PROJECT: INDIAN TRAILS
EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE: RR-10/AP TRIPS PER DAY= 3,650
PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE: RR-1.25 TRIPS PER DAY= 46,077 TRIP INCREASE= 42,427
DISTRIBUTION PROJECT
TO %1 TRAFFIC
ORANGE BOULEVARD 7% 2,970 -60TH STREET 11% 4,667 PERSIMMON BOULEVARD 38% 16,122 --SYCAMORE DRIVE 28% 11,880 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD 24% 10,183 SOUTHERN BOULEVARD 15% 6 364 BROAD 8% 3 394 140TH AVENUE 5% 2,121 ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD 5% 2,121 140TH AVENUE 14% 5,940 ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD 13% 5 516 140TH AVENUE 9% 3,818 COCONUT BOULEVARD 7% 2,970 ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD 5% 2,121 60TH STREET 5% 2,121 ORANGE BOULEVARD 1% 424 PERSIMMON BOULEVARD 1% 424 140TH AVENUE - 21% 8,910 COCONUT BOULEVARD 21% 8,910 -IBIS ROAD 22% 9 334
2040 PBC MPO
MINTO WEST PREVIOUS APPROVAL: MINTO WEST CURRENT APPROVAL:
tiEL
2040 COST
Daily Trips(2J
35,831 63,562 27 731
FEASIBLE LOS "D" TRIP PROJECT
LAI\IES CAPACITY INCREASE SIGNIFICANCE(1l
4D 33,200 8.95% YES 4D 33,200 14.06% YES 4D 33,200 48.56% YES -4D 33,200 35.78% YES 4D 33,200 30.67% YES 4D 33 200 19.17% YES 4D 33 200 10.22% YES 2 15,200 13.95% YES 2 15,200 13.95% YES 2 15,200 39.08% YES 2 15 200 36.29% YES 2 15,200 25.12% YES 2 15,200 19.54% YES 2 15,200 13.95% YES
4D 33,200 6.39% YES 2 15,200 2.79% NO 2 15,200 2.79% NO
4D 33,200 26.84% YES 4D 33,200 26.84% YES 4D 33 200 28.11% YES
TRAFFIC JISTRIBUTim PROJECT MINTO TRIP
ASSIGN.
NEW MINTO TRIPS(2l
TOTAL 2040
TRAFFIC TO VOLUME 1%1 TRAFFIC
ORANGE BOULEVARD 30,000 7% 2,970 20% 5,546 38,516 -60TH STREET 26,300 11% 4,667 27% 7,487 38,454 PERSIMMON BOULEVARD 35,700 38% 16,122 32% 8,874 60,696 --SYCAMORE DRIVE 35,700 28% 11,880 38% 10,538 58,117 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD 37,000 30% 12,728 33% 9,151 58,879 SOUTHERN BOULEVARD 22400 15% 6 364 22% 6 101 34 865 BROAD 22 600 8% 3 394 10% 2 773 28 767 140TH AVENUE 13,000 5% 2,121 18% 4,992 20,113 ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD 16 800 5% 2 121 16.5% 4 576 23 497 140TH AVENUE 200 14% 5,940 0% 0 6,140 ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD 9 000 15% 6 364 16% 4 437 19 801 140TH AVENUE 8,600 9% 3,818 3% 832 13,250 COCONUT BOULEVARD 9,200 7% 2,970 2.5% 693 12,863 ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD 12400 5% 2 121 0.0% 0 14 521 60TH STREET 19400 5% 2 121 0.5% 139 21 660 ORANGE BOULEVARD 10,300 1% 424 5% 1,387 12,111 PERSIMMON BOULEVARD 6,900 1% 424 2% 555 7,879 140TH AVENUE - 18,100 21% 8,910 16% 4,437 31,447 COCONUT BOULEVARD - 32,000 21% 8,910 16% 4,437 45,347 IBIS ROAD 33,300 22% 9,334 20% 5,546 48,180
1) Project is significant when net trip increase is greater than 1% for v/c of 1.4 or more, 2% for v/c of 1.2 or more and 3% for v/c less than 1.2.
LOS "D" VIC
LANES CAPACITY RATIO
4D 33,200 1.16 4D 33,200 1.16 4D 33,200 1.83 4D 33,200 1.75 4D 33,200 1.77 4D 33 200 1.05 4D 33 200 0.87
40(3) 33,200 0.61 2 15 200 1.55 2 15,200 0.40 2 15 200 1.30 2 15,200 0.87 2 15,200 0.85 2 15 200 0.96
4D 33 200 0.65 2 15,200 0.80 2 15,200 0.52
4D 33,200 0.95 4D 33,200 1.37 4D 33,200 1.45
2) The 2040 PBC MPO mcxlel volumes did not account for the newly approved Minto West plan of development. Therefore, the difference between the new approval and the previous approved Minto West trips were induded in this analysis. Note that this methodology provides a conservative analysis since it does not reflect any diversions created by the introduction of the significant non-residentails uses in the area. 3) Per Minto West approval.
Traffic Impact Analysis
k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc
APPENDIX F: PALM BEACH COUNTY FIVE-YEAR ROAD PROGRAM
Gen
eral
note
onin
tere
stpr
ojec
tions
:
Inte
rest
earn
ings
onga
sta
xes
are
show
non
this
shee
t.In
tere
stea
rnin
gson
impa
ctfe
esre
mai
nw
ithin
each
impa
ctfe
ear
eaan
dar
eno
tsho
wn
abov
e.
AFD
OT
(ant
icip
ates
CIG
Pfu
nds)
upto
$2,8
80,0
00fo
rrig
ht-o
f-way
acqu
isiti
onof
Con
gres
sAv
e.,N
.ofN
orth
lake
Blv
d.to
Alt.
A-1
-Ain
FY20
17.
FDO
T(a
ntic
ipat
esC
IGP
fund
s)up
to$3
50,0
00fo
rcon
stru
ctio
nof
Nor
thla
keBl
vd.a
ndM
ilita
ryTr
ailI
nter
sect
ion
inFY
2017
.
Addi
tiona
lfun
dsin
clud
e$7
,000
,000
from
the
Atla
ntic
Ave.
Agre
emen
t.
Proj
ectio
nsfo
rint
eres
tear
ning
sas
sum
eth
atav
erag
eca
shba
lanc
esw
illap
prox
imat
e3.
0tim
esth
ecu
rren
tyea
rrev
enue
proj
ectio
nsat
anin
tere
stra
teof
3%in
FY20
16th
ruFY
2020
.
Page 2 of 5
PALM BEACH COUNTY FIVE YEAR ROAD PROGRAM- EXHIBIT A ($'sIN 1,000'8)
Annual Update- Adopted- December 15, 2015
FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 PROJECT LIMITS DESCRIPTION
Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase
6th Ave. S. over Lake Osborne Dr. Bridge Replacement 1,200 DIR 150 R 6,000 c --45th. Street E. of Haverhill Rd. toW. of Military Trail 0.1 mi, 6 L 50 D 50 R
Admin. Support/Equipment Countywide Staff support and Computer Equip. for Program 370 p 370 p 370 p 370 p 370 p
Annual Contract Advertising Countywide Advertising 20 p 20 p 20 p 20 p 20 p
Atlantic Ave. Florida's Turnpike Intersection Improvements 1,500 c --
Australian Ave. Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Intersection Improvements .!Z!!...£_ I 1,500 c
Australian Ave. W 10th St. to 330' N ofW 13th. St Intersection Improvements 100 R/C ---720 DIR
I 6,000 DIM/C
Benoist Farms Rd. S.R. 80 to Belvedere Rd. 0.9 mi, 3 L
Boynton Beach Blvd. Florida's Turnpike Southbound Entrance/Exit Intersection Improvements
Camino Real Rd./Boca Club over Intracoastal Waterway Bridge Rehabilitation
700 R
801 p
5,200 c
Center St. Thelma Ave. to Woodland Estates Dr. 0.3 mi, 3 L 800 c ---
Church St. Limestone Creek Rd. toW. of Central Blvd. 0.5 mi , 3 L 200 RIM 1,200 c
Clint Moore Rd. over LWDD E-4 Canal E. of Congress Ave. to E. of L.W.D.D. E-4 Canal 0.3 mi , 6 L (Bridge Replacement) 150 D 100 R 1,500 c
Congress Ave. over W.P.B. "F" Canal N. of Okeechobee Blvd. to Ware Dr. 0.1 mi, 5 L (Bridge Replacement- Culvert) 50 R 500 c --
Congress Ave. Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Intersection Improvements 400 R 2,000 c ---Congress Ave. N. of Northlake Blvd. to Alt. A-1-A 0.6 mi, 2 L & 3 L 5,760 RIM 5,000 c
Connector Lyons Rd. to Acme Dairy Rd. 0.5 mi, 2/3 L 1,250 c
Coral Ridge Dr. S. County Regional Park N. Entrance to 750' N. 0.1 mi, 2 L 800 c
CR 880 (Old SR 80 ) Rehabilitationll-leavy Maintenance Rehabilitation 1,000 c 1,000 c 1,000 c 1,000 c
CR 880 (Old SR 80 ) over C-51 Canal Bridge Replacement 2,200 c
Drexel Rd. over L.W.D.D. L-2 Canal Fair Green Rd. to 15th Ln. N. 0.1 mi, 3 L (Bridge Replacement- Culvert) 700 c
Flavor Pict Rd. S.R. 7 to Lyons Rd. 1.0 mi, 2 L 60 DIR 4,500 c
Florida Mango Rd. over LWDD L-9 &. L-10 Canals I 10th Ave. North to Edgewater Drive 0.9 mi , 3 L (Bridge Replacements) 650 DIR 100 R 3,300 c
Florida Mango Rd. over L.W.D.D. L-8 Canal Edgewater Drive to Barbados Rd. 0.6 mi, 3 L (Bridge Replacement) 50 R 1,600 c
Florida Mango Rd. over L.W.D.D. L-6 Canal N. of Myrica Rd. to Summit Blvd. 0.5 mi, 3 L (Bridge Replacement- Culvert) 100 R 1,900 c --Garden Rd. over FOOT Canal S. of FOOT Canal to S of Blue Heron Blvd. 0.3 mi , 3 L (Bridge Replacement- Culvert) 1,200 c
Gateway Blvd. Military Trail Intersection Improvements 500 R 1,100 c
*See Footnotes, Phase(s): S- Study; D=Design; M=Mitigation; R=RIVV Acq.; C=Construction; P=Payment
Page 3 of 5
PALM BEACH COUNTY FIVE YEAR ROAD PROGRAM- EXHIBIT A ($'sIN 1,000'8)
Annual Update- Adopted- December 15, 2015
FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 PROJECT LIMITS DESCRIPTION
Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase
Gateway Blvd. High Ridge Rd Intersection Improvements 100 R 1,060 c
Glades Area R&R Throughout the Glades Rep ai r/R e co nstru ctio n 700 c 700 c 700 c 700 c 700 c
Glades Rd. Butts Rd. Intersection Improvements 100 RIP 300 C/P
Haverhill Rd. Lantana Rd. to S. of LWDD L-14 Canal 0.9 mi, 4 L 3,500 c
Haverhill Rd. S. of LWDD L-14 Canal to Lake Worth Rd. 1.3 mi, 5 L 8,800 RIM/C
Haverhill Rd. N. of Caribbean Blvd. to Bee Line Hwy. 1.6 mi, 5 L 500 DIM/C 9,000 c
Hood Rd. E. of Florida's Turnpike toW. of Central Blvd. 1.2 mi , 4L 6,400 c
Hood Rd. Central Blvd. Intersection Improvements 200 RIM 1,000 c
Indiantown Rd. Jupiter Fanns Rd. Intersection Improvements 750 c
Jog Rd. S. of Clint Moore Rd., to Linton Blvd. Safety Improvements & Resurfacing 1,500 c
Jog Rd. S. of Hypoluxo Rd. to 10th Ave. N. Safety Improvements & Resurfacing 2,100 c
Jog Rd. Roebuck Rd. Intersection Improvements 920 D/C
Kirk Rd. over L.W.D.D. L-7 Canal S. of L.W.D.D. L-7 Canal to Pot O'Gold St. 0.1 mi , 3 L (Bridge Replacement- Culvert) 800 c
Lake Worth Rd.
Linton Blvd. 380 R
630 c
I 1,500 c
Jog Rd. Intersection Improvements
Military Tr. Intersection Improvements
Lyons Rd. Hillsboro Canal to S.W. 18th Street 0.3 mi, 6 L 2,000 c --
Lyons Rd. Clint Moore Rd. to Atlantic Ave. 3.0 mi, 4 L 100 D 9,700 c
Lyons Rd. Lantana Rd. toN. of L.W.D.D. L-14 Canal 0.9 mi , 4 L 6,120 c
Lyons Rd. N. of L.W.D.D. L-14 Canal to Lake Worth Rd. 1.1 mi,4L 400 D/R 5,000 c --
Lyons Rd. Lake Worth Rd. to S. of L.W.D.D. L-11 Canal 0.5 mi, 3 L 250 D 2,500 c
Lyons Rd. S. of L.W.D.D. L-11 Canal toN. of L.W.D.D. L-10 Canal 0.6 mi, 2/3 L 100 p
Northlake Blvd. E. of Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd. to E. of Hall Blvd. 1.0 mi,4L 100 D 3,000 c
Northlake Blvd. E. of Hall Blvd. to Coconut Blvd. 2.4 mi, 4 L 2,000 RIM 9,200 c --
Northlake Blvd. S.R. 710 to Military Tr. Safety Improvements & Resurfacing 1,500 c
Northlake Blvd. Military Tr. Intersection Improvements 1,000 c --
Okeechobee Blvd. Church St. Intersection Improvements 1,000 R 1,200 c
Old Dixie Hwy. Yamato Rd. to Linton Blvd. 3.0 mi, 3 L 2,000 RIM 10,350 c
*See Footnotes, Phase(s): S- Study; D=Design; M=Mitigation; R=RIVV Acq.; C=Construction; P=Payment
Page 4 of 5
PALM BEACH COUNTY FIVE YEAR ROAD PROGRAM- EXHIBIT A ($'sIN 1,000'8)
Annual Update- Adopted- December 15, 2015
FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 PROJECT LIMITS DESCRIPTION
Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase
Old Dixie Hwy. Park Ave. to Northlake Blvd. 0.9 mi, 3 L 3,500 c
Palmetto Park Rd. E. of Military Trail to 1-95 Intersection Improvements 200 DIM 800 c
Palmetto Park Rd. over L.W.D.D. E-4 Canal (EI Rio Canal) Bridge Replacement 2,900 c
Palmetto Park Rd. Bascule Bridge over Intracoastal Waterway Rehab/Painting 2,500 c
Pathway Program Countywide Pathways 1,500 DIR/C 1,500 D/R/C 1,500 D/R/C 1,500 DIR/C 1,500 DIR/C
PGA Blvd. Central Blvd. Intersection Improvements 500 c
PGA Blvd. Military Tr. Intersection Improvements 1,800 c
PGA Blvd. Ellison Wilson Rd. Intersection Improvements 490 c
Purdy Ln. over LWDD E-3 Canal Forest Hill Elem. To E. Major Dr. 0.2 mi, 3 L (Bridge Replacement) 2,300 R/C
Recording Fees Countywide Right-of-Way 20 R 20 R 20 R 20 R 20 R
Reserve-Bridges/Culverts/Pipes Countywide Rehab./Repair/Replacement 1,050 S/0/RIM/C 1,480 S/DIR/M/C 1,100 S/DIRIM/C 1,850 S/0/RIM/C 700 DIR/M/C
R e se rv e-lnte rsecti on s Countywide Design, R/W, Mitigation & Construction 3,600 DIR/M/C 3,840 DIR/MIC 3,250 D/RIM/C 500 D/R/M/C 3,750 DIR/M/C
Reserve-Pavement Markings Countywide Pavement Markings 400 DIR/C
Reserve-Plans/Align. Countywide Study, Design & Mitigation 200 S/D/M 200 S/DIM 200 S/DIM 200 S/D/M 200 S/D/M
Reserve-Railroad Crossings Countywide Rehabilitation/Upgrade 600 D/C/P 600 D/C/P 600 D/CIP 600 D/CIP 600 D/C/P
Reserve-Resurfacing Countywide Resurfacing 2,000 DIR/C
Reserve-R/W Countywide Land Acquisition 200 R 200 R 200 R 200 R 200 R
Reserve-Traffic Calming Countywide Minor Improvements 20 D/C 20 D/C 20 D/C 20 D/C 20 D/C
Reserve-Traffic Signals Countywide Mast Arms 600 D/C 600 D/C 600 D/C 600 D/C 600 D/C
Roebuck Rd. S.R. 7 to Jog Rd. 3.0 mi, 4 L 100 DIM
Roebuck Rd. Jog Rd. to Haverhill Rd. 1.0 mi, 5 L 250 DIR 3,200 c
Royal Palm Beach Blvd. M-Canal to S. of Orange Blvd. 1.0 mi, 3/5 L 300 RIM 3,700 c
Sandalfoot Blvd. over LWDD E-1 Canal State Road 7 0.1 mi, 5 L (Bridge Replacement) 1,850 c
Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd. Orange Blvd. to S. of Northlake Blvd. 1.8 mi, 4/6 L 7,400 c
Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd. Northlake Blvd. Intersection Improvements 4,200 c
Sherwood Forest Blvd. over L.W.D.D. L-8 Canal Bridge Improvements 500 c
Silver Beach Rd. E. of Congress Ave. to Old Dixie Hwy. 0.9 mi, 2 L & 3 L 4,080 c
*See Footnotes, Phase(s): S- Study; D=Design; M=Mitigation; R=RIVV Acq.; C=Construction; P=Payment
Page 5 of 5
PALM BEACH COUNTY FIVE YEAR ROAD PROGRAM- EXHIBIT A ($'sIN 1,000'8)
Annual Update- Adopted- December 15, 2015
FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 PROJECT LIMITS DESCRIPTION
Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase
Southern Blvd. Lyons Rd./Sanbury's Way Intersection Improvements 2,100 p
S.R. 7 S.R. 710 to S. of 150th Ct. N. Right-of-Way 50 RIP
S.W. 3rd. St. over LWDD E-1 Canal State Road 7 0.1 mi, 3 L (Bridge Replacement) 1,850 c
S.W.18th St. Military Tr. Intersection Improvements 1,500 c
Toney Penna Dr. Old Dixie Hwy. Intersection Improvements 200 c
Woolbright Rd. Military Tr. to Lawrence Rd. Resurfacing, Safety and Drainage Improvements 1,100 c
Project Totals 1 57,8901 1101,2701 ~ ~ 1 25,9801
*See Footnotes, Phase(s): S- Study; D=Design; M=Mitigation; R=RIVV Acq.; C=Construction; P=Payment