Post on 11-Jun-2018
transcript
Competition Sensitive Document Attached
Team ZZXIPT 2008 White Paper - TEMPLATEThe Attached Document is Competition Sensitive until May 2, 2008
IPT Phase 2 White Paper File naming Convention:Section 01 IPT2008_01_Phase2_TeamX_White_Paper_revXX.docSection 02 IPT2008_02_Phase2_TeamX_White_Paper_revXX.docSection 03 IPT2008_03_Phase2_ TeamX_White_Paper_revXX.doc
Project Team Baseline Alt. 1 Alt. 2 Alt. 301 Micro UAV Team A 01-BL 01A-ALT1 01A–ALT2 01A–ALT301 Micro UAV Team B 01-BL 01B-ALT1 01B–ALT2 01B–ALT301 Micro UAV Team C 01-BL 01C-ALT1 01C–ALT2 01C–ALT302 LETS Team D 02-BL 02D-ALT1 02C–ALT2 N/A02 LETS Team E 02-BL 02E-ALT1 02E–ALT2 N/A02 LETS Team F 02-BL 02F-ALT1 02F–ALT2 N/A03 CCLR Team G 03-BL 03G-ALT1 03G–ALT2 03G–ALT303 CCLR Team H 03-BL 03H-ALT1 03H–ALT2 03H–ALT303 CCLR Team I 03-BL 03I-ALT1 03I–ALT2 03I–ALT3
If you find this document unattended put it in a secure place and notify
Dr. Robert A. Frederick, Jr. IPT Project Director
Office: 256-824-7203Cell: 256-503-4909
frederic@eng.uah.edu
IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 1 of 20
Alternate Concepts White Paper
IPT ZZX Systems Engineering
Discipline NameDiscipline NameDiscipline NameDiscipline NameDiscipline Name
John Doe; Team Leader; InstitutionJohn Doe; Thee University of Alabama in HuntsvilleJohn Doe; Southern UniversityJohn Doe; ESTACAJohn Doe; Institution
Modeling and SimulationDiscipline NameDiscipline NameDiscipline NameDiscipline NameDiscipline Name
John Doe; Team Leader; InstitutionJohn Doe; Southern UniversityJohn Doe; ESTACAJohn Doe; InstitutionJohn Doe
Manufacturing and TestingDiscipline NameDiscipline NameDiscipline NameDiscipline NameDiscipline Name
John Doe; Team Leader; InstitutionJohn Doe; InstitutionJohn Doe; InstitutionJohn Doe; InstitutionJohn Doe, Institution
Submitted By:
[Insert Company Name Here]
<February xx, 2008>
Submitted To:Mr. Tom Percy and Dr. D. Brian Landrum, or Dr. P.J. Benfield and Dr. Matthew Turner or
Dr. Robert Frederick and Dr. D. Brian LandrumDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
The University of Alabama in HuntsvilleRobert.Frederick@uah.edu
IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 2 of 20
Abstract[Begin typing your abstract here in English]
IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 3 of 20
Technical Description [Limited to pages 4 - 5 only]
1.0 Overview of Phase 2For Phase 2, the individual IPTs have worked independently to produce three alternative configurations to a Baseline Design. The deliverables for Phase 2 are a White Paper and an Oral Presentation. The White Paper compares the Baseline Concept, named the Project Specific Name and Serial Number with three alternative concepts. This White Paper summarizes a strategy for selecting alternative systems, qualitative and quantitative information to evaluate each idea, and a logical rationale for down selecting one concept from among the four presented.
1.1 Specification Summary [Begin typing first paragraph here]
1.2 Team X Approach to Phase 2
[Begin typing first paragraph here]
IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 4 of 20
[Begin typing first paragraph here]
Figure 1 shows the outline of the design process used for Phase 2.
1/16/2004 Section 3 - Landrum 4
Project Office
CDD/Customer
Systems Engineer
Guidance/Controls Mechanism
Aerodynamics
Seeker Guidance/Controls
Engineering Analysis
System Simulation
Results
1
8
2
3
45
6
7
Lethality Propulsion
Systems Engineering
Figure 1 – Outline of the Design Methodology1
IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 5 of 20
2.0 Description of Concepts [Limited to page 6 only]In this section, you are to explain the logic that you used in identifying the attributes of a concept, eliminating possible choices, and configuring the three alternative concepts. Since there will be thousands of possible configurations, and you will only present three, this part of the White Paper briefly describes the logic and strategy for the configurations that you are presenting. It is essential to concentrate on the major attributes necessary to make a configuration decision.
Table 1 summarizes the final configurations of the Baseline plus your three team-specific alternatives. It shows the different categories of configuration choices in the left column. The template has an example for the IPT 2008 class for inspection. The Systems Engineering leads from each team need to reconfigure this table for you project. Within each category, there are several configuration states listed. Teams may add team-specific choices within categories if required without revealing the choice to the entire class. There are four columns in the table that describe configuration state for each concept. Systems engineering for all teams again need to propose the values for the class baseline so that it is presented consistently by both teams.
IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 6 of 20
Table 1– BOOST Matrix for [Project Name] [Page 7]
Baseline Alternative Concepts
03-BL 03H-ALT1 03H-ALT2 03H-ALT3CONFIGURATIONCATEGORY
STATE SMURV
1. MUAV Platform [Fixed Wing][Rotary Wing][Compound]
[Other]Rotary Wing
2. Propulsion [Electric][Gas][Other]
Electric
3. Communication Concept of Operations
[Relay][Direct][Combo][Other]
Direct
4. Command & Control
[Tele-Operated][Autonomous]
[Other]
Tele-Operated
5. Power Supply [Solar][Battery][Other]
Battery
6. Power Concept of Operations
[Single Use][Recharge]
[Mid-Mission Recharge]
Recharge
7. Communication [IR][RF]
[Other]Tube
8. Primary Structure / Material
[Composite][Metal][Plastic][Other]
Plastic
9. Guidance Sensor Package
[SLU][COTS] [Other] SLU
10. Number of MUAVs
[Single][Multiple] Single
IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 7 of 20
2.1 Baseline Concept: “Shark 1” [ 01-BL] [page 8][Give a good 1 page description of the overall configuration (Table 2), key subsystems, operations, technical data (Table 2), evaluation of the configuration (Table 3), and others as you see fit. Refer to Figure 2 in section 5.]
IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 8 of 20
2.2 Alternative 1 Concept: “Sword Fish” [01A – ALT1] Page 9[Give a good 1 page description of the overall configuration (Table 2), key subsystems, operations, technical data (Table 2), evaluation of the configuration (Table 3), and others as you see fit. Refer to Figure 2 in section 5.]
IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 9 of 20
2.3 Alternative 2 Concept: “Crab” [01A – ALT2 ]” page 10[Give a good 1 page description of the overall configuration (Table 2), key subsystems, operations, technical data (Table 2), evaluation of the configuration (Table 3), and others as you see fit. Refer to Figure 2 in section 5.]
IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 10 of 20
2.4 Alternative 3 Concept: “Sting Ray” [01A – ALT1 ] [Give a good 1 page description of the overall configuration (Table 2), key subsystems, operations, technical data (Table 2), evaluation of the configuration (Table 3), and others as you see fit. Refer to Figure 2 in section 5.].
IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 11 of 20
3.0 Selection of Final Concept [Limited to Page 12][Discuss Table 3. Explain the categories that you used, the weighting factors, and the scoring methods. Summarize the biggest distinction(s) and the reasoning behind your evaluation of them. Declare one concept as your Preferred Concept]. Explain WHY you think that the choice you made is the best potential idea, based on the customer requirements.]
IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 12 of 20
4.0 Phase 3 Plan [Limited to Page 13]
4.1 Key Issues to Address[Note the major issues that must be addressed in order to deploy the concept by the required date. These could include technology development, clarification of actual operations interfaces with station, testing and verification, availability of funding, etc.]
4.3 Phase 3 Schedule[Outline your plans for refining the selected concept in Phase 3. Describe how you intend to address the developmental issues in Phase 3 using analysis, assumption, or other methods.]
IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 13 of 20
5.0 Illustrations [Page 14]
Figure 2 – Baseline: “Shark 1” [01-BL]
Figure 3 -:Alternative 1 Concept : “Sword Fish” [01A – ALT1]
IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 14 of 20
[Page 15]
Figure 4 – Alternative 2 Concept: “Crab” [01A – ALT2]
Figure 5 – Alternative 3 Concept : “Sting Ray” [01A – ALT1]
IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 15 of 20
Table 2 – Engineering Summary (required) [Page 16]
03-BL 03H-ALT1
03H-Alt2
03H-ALT3
SMURV NAME Units1. Micro UAV Data a) Width m b) Length m d) Height m c) Weight g2. Flight Data a) Cruise Speed fps b) Hover Altitude m c) Flight Altitude m d) Minimum Release Altitude m e) Maximum Range m f) Maximum Endurance Minutes3. Video Data a) Frame Rate fps b) Quality (letter height / distance) -4. Other (Team supplied)
IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 16 of 20
Table 3 - Concept Evaluation Matrix [Page 17]
Scoring LegendNA
Not Analyzed0
Does Not Meet0
Partially Meets5
Meets10
CDD Attribute Score Wt.
03-BL 03H-Alt1 03H-Alt2 03H-Alt3CDD Requirement
SMURV Sword Fish Crab Sting
Ray
Weight2 Bofors
L70
Bofors
L70
Bofors
L70
Bofors
L70
Threshold: 500 gObjective: 250 g
Maximum Height/ Width Dimension 3
212.9
212.9
212.9
212.9Threshold: 0.46 mObjective: 0.30 m
Hover/Flight Altitude 3 140
140
140
140
Threshold: 1 to 15 mObjective: 0.5 to 100 m
Collision Avoidance3
20 10Threshold: DesiredObjective: Required
Return to Platform after Mission Complete 2 NA Threshold: Desired
Objective: RequiredRecharge Capability 3 NA Threshold: Desired
Objective: RequiredTime of Flight
2 7.5
Threshold: 30 minObjective: 60 min
Range of Flight2
10-15Threshold: 150 mObjective: 1000 m
Loss of Signal Correction 1 NA Threshold: Desired
Objective: RequiredGCS Receipt of Video 2 NA Threshold: Desired
Objective: RequiredVideo Frame Rate 1 Threshold: 5 to 10 fps
Objective: 15 fpsVideo Quality 3 Identify 2.54 cm
lettering at 6.096 m User Supplied
3 User Selected
3 User Selected
1 User Selected
Total ScoreBest Concept = 100
IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 17 of 20
6.0 References [Page 18]1Fleeman, Eugene L, “Tactical Missile Design,” AIAA Education Series, 2001, ISBN: I-56347-494-8
IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 18 of 20
References: References must be limited to easily accessible documents, i.e., those available from libraries, databases, or other public sources. They are to be numbered in the order in which they are cited and grouped at the end of the manuscript in the following form (not listed alphabetically). Use the INSERT REFERENCE FOOTNONE [ENDNOTE] Command at the point in the text where the reference is cited. This will automatically put you to the end of the report where you can type your reference. The examples below are to show the proper format of different sources.
1) Journals: Walker, R. E., Stone, A. R., and Shandor, M., "Secondary Gas Injection in a Conical Rocket Nozzle," AIAA Journal, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1963, pp. 334-338.
2) Books: Turner, M. J., Martin, H. C., and Leible, R. C., "Further Development and Applications of Stiffness Method," Matrix Methods of Structural Analysis, 1st ed., Vol. 1, Wiley, New York, 1963, pp. 6-10.
3) AIAA Book Series: Sutton, K., "Air Radiation Revisited," Thermal Design of Aeroassisted Orbital Transfer Vehicles, edited by H. F. Nelson, Vol. 96, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, New York, 1985, pp. 419-441.
4) Reports: Book, E., and Bratman, H., "Using Compilers to Build Compilers," Systems Development Corp., SP-176, Santa Monica, CA, Aug. 1960.
5) Transactions/Proceedings: Soo, S. L., "Boundary-Layer Motion of a Gas-Solid Suspension," Proceedings of the Symposium on Interaction Between Fluids and Particles, Vol. 1, Inst. of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1962, pp. 50-63.
6) AIAA Meeting Papers: Bhutta, V. A., and Lewis, C. H., "Aerothermodynamic Performance of 3-D and Bent-Nose RVs under Hypersonic Conditions," AIAA Paper 90-3068, Aug. 1990.
7) Web Page: http://www.place.com, UAH Home Page, Assessed February 20, 2005.Classified or export-restricted references, personal/private communications, and personal Web sites are not permitted. Give inclusive page numbers for references to journal articles and a page or chapter for books. Cite references in numerical order in the text.
IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 19 of 20
Appendix A – Instructor Directed Reporting Items[This appendix documents any other instructor directed team reporting items that are not critical to the Phase 2 White Paper, These could be copies of telephone reports with Southern University and ESTACA, revised letters of intent, or other tasks that can be documented in the appendix of the White Paper.]
1
IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 20 of 20