1

Integrating a community-based healthy homes and asthma

intervention into a large public housing organization: successes and

challengesJessica Ramsay, MPH, AE-CSinai Urban Health Institute

2

Outline• Background

– Sinai Urban Health Institute– Asthma Epidemiology, Housing and Health– Sinai Asthma Program

• Helping Children Breathe and Thrive in Chicago’s Public Housing– Overview– Intervention– Recruitment– Final Outcomes

• Lessons Learned and Challenges• What next?

3

Sinai Urban Health Institute

• Part of the Sinai Health System – located on Chicago’s urban Westside

• Founded in 2000– Group of epidemiologists, health

educators, research assistants, and community health workers

• Develops and implements effective approaches that improve the health of urban communities – Main focus is Chicago’s Westside

4

Asthma Epidemiology• Asthma is the most common chronic condition of

childhood– Over 10 million children (14.0% of children <18

yrs) in the U.S. have asthma (NHIS 2011)– Rates vary by race/ ethnicity

• Puerto Rican 30.0%• Black, non-Hispanic 20.7% • White, non-Hispanic 12.3%• Mexican/ Mexican-American 12.2%

5

Asthma Epidemiology• Inner-city, minority children experience a

disproportionate asthma burden – Prevalence approaches 1 in 4

• Sinai’s Community Health Survey– Experience more severe asthma

• Mortality and morbidity rates higher in inner-city, minority Chicago communities

– More likely to rely primarily on Emergency Department (ED) for asthma care

6

Asthma EpidemiologyPublic Housing Residents• Public housing residents more likely to be

poor and members of racial or ethnic minority, both associated with poor health outcomes (Digenis-Bury, 2008)

• Higher rates of asthma documented among federally assisted housing residents (Northridge, 2010)

• Public housing is associated with higher levels of environmental triggers that exacerbate asthma (Northridge, 2010)

7

Asthma Control• A person’s home can heavily impact

asthma symptoms• Many children and families are in

need of individualized education on how best to control asthma

• Asthma is a serious lung disease, yet with proper long-term management it can be controlled and children can live normal lives!

8

Four successful previous interventions

– Pediatric Asthma Intervention 1 (Michael Reese Health Trust) 2000-2004

– Pediatric Asthma Intervention 2 (IDPH) 2004-2006

– Controlling Pediatric Asthma through Collaboration & Education (IDPH) 2006-2009

– Healthy Home, Healthy Child (CDC) 2008-2011

– Helping Children Breathe and Thrive in Chicago’s Public Housing (HCBT) 2011-2013

9

Helping Children Breathe and Thrive in Chicago Public Housing (HCBT)

April 2011– July 2013

A Healthy Homes Partnership

10

Overview• SUHI approached the Chicago Housing Authority

(CHA) to partner in addressing asthma in public housing on Chicago’s Westside

• Funded by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)

• Based on the framework of Sinai’s established CHW home visit asthma program

• Translated healthy homes asthma model in six Chicago public housing developments

• Utilizes a collaborative approach working with the CHA, building managers, FamilyWorks, and incorporating meaningful participation by the community

11

Hiring and Training CHWs• CHWs are recruited from the CHA properties

– No previous asthma knowledge required– Passion for working with community members

• 75 hour training conducted by the Sinai Asthma Education Training Institute– Asthma Overview, Home Environmental

Assessment, CHW Core Skills, HIPAA and Data collection

• Shadowed teaching and role play evaluation• Random shadowing and evaluation

throughout intervention

12

Intervention• CHWs are at the heart of the intervention

• Provide home-based comprehensive, individualized asthma education

• Focusing on medical management (e.g., recognizing and responding to attacks, medication adherence and techniques)

• Trigger reduction in the home environment

• CHWs link participants with medical and social services

13

Participant Recruitment• Extremely challenging

– Partnered with CHA Case Managers – Added four additional CHA sites

• Identified a lot of adults with asthma– Children: 1 year intervention with 5- 6

home visits– Adults: 6 month intervention with 3-4

home visits• Eligibility Criteria

– Have asthma and live in one of six properties

14

Recruitment Numbers

15

Evaluation• Program evaluation is a significant part of

all interventions • Data Collection

– Baseline, monthly over the phone, and at home visits

– Via self-report • All activities are documented, which allows

for robust process and outcome evaluation

16

Program Completion• Adults (6 Month Intervention)

– 73 adults enrolled• 81% (n=55) completed intervention

• Children (1 Year Intervention)– 85 children enrolled

• 71% (n=60) completed intervention• Lost to Study: 24%

17

DemographicsChildren/Caregiver (N=85) Adults(N=73)

Race/Ethnicity 95.3% Non-Hispanic Black 91.8% Non-Hispanic Black

Insurance 92.9% Medicaid 65.8% Medicaid27.4% Uninsured

Income 65.9% <$20,000 63.1% <$20,000

Education 33% high school degree or less 33% high school degree or less

Employment 60% Unemployed 68.5% Unemployed

Relationship 73% single/widowed/divorced 84%single/widowed/divorced

Primary Care Physician 99% report yes* 78% report yes*

* Reporting is different than actual behavior

18

Baseline: Asthma ControlNu

mbe

r of p

artic

ipan

ts

(n=1

58)

Well C

ontrolle

d

Not Well C

ontrolle

d

Very Poorly

Controlle

d0

40

80

120

31 31

96

19

Final Outcomes: Child Asthma Symptoms

02468

101214

4.13.0 3.1

0.8 0.8 0.9

Baseline Follow-up

*

Days

/Nig

hts (

max

=14)

* Statistically significant difference (p<0.05) per Wilcoxon signed-rank non-parametric test. A 0.5 point change is also clinically significant

Children Symptom Frequency in the past 2 weeks at Baseline vs. average during follow-up year (n=59)

*

20

Final Outcomes for Children (n=59):

Urgent Health Resource Utilization*

44%

14%

42%

Year Prior to InterventionNo Urgent HRULess Than One Urgent HRUOne or More Urgent HRU

75%

10%

15%

Intervention YearNo Urgent HRULess Than One Urgent HRUOne or More Urgent HRU

* Sum Emergency Department (ED) Visits, Hospitalizations, and Urgent Clinic Visits

21

Final Outcomes:Caregiver Quality of Life

Overall Score Activity Limitation Domain

Emotional Function Domain

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

5.45.9

5.1

6.16.5

5.9

Baseline 12 Months

*

Pediatric Asthma Caregiver’s Quality of Life (N=42)^

^This tool is collected once per household* Statistically significant difference (p<0.05) per Wilcoxon signed-rank non-parametric test. A 0.5 point change is also clinically significant

22

Final Outcomes:Asthma Triggers

Presence of Home Triggers as Observed During the Home Evaluation Assessment at Baseline and the end of the Intervention for Adult and Child Participants (n=107)

23

Housing Referrals• Collaboration with FamilyWorks, CHA, and

property management to develop system of reporting participant housing issues– 30 homes referred with 72 different

issues– 86% (62 issues) of housing issues were

resolved– Moldy carpeting removed, large cracks and holes

filled where rodents and pests were entering, mold from water damage abated, pest control, bed bugs

• Results: Participants reported improved asthma symptoms and improved overall quality of life

24

Case Story

“I thank you for all of your hard work and the effort you put forth in not only

educating us about Asthma and the importance of using safe cleaning

products, asthma inhalers and allergy triggers, but improving our overall quality

of life at home. It means a lot and I am thankful to have received you as a case

manager. I also appreciate that your manner and the way you communicated

with us and supported us as a family. Thank you again and sincerest regards,”

25

Lessons Learned & Challenges• Collaboration

– Merging two established processes (two cultures)

– Finding key players to work with is essential to success

– Remaining sensitive to residents individual needs while being sure to follow established CHA protocols

– Open and thorough, structured communication from the beginning is key on both ends

26

Lessons Learned & Challenges• Community Health Workers

– Quickly and effectively establish relationships of trust with the families that they serve

– Support & mentoring of CHWs is vital to success– Effective hiring and training processes are

essential – Hire CHWs for skills only they can bring (cultural

sensitivity, community connections, etc.). May need support in other areas (e.g., paperwork, managing a case load, computers)

26

27

Lessons Learned & Challenges• Participants

– Economic hardship and competing priorities– Multiple caregivers - important to reach all of

them• Compliance

– Smoking cessation– Medication adherence– Management companies have a process to

modifying the home environment

27

28

What next?• Applied for and received additional funding

from HUD to work exclusively with adults• Helping Chicago’s Westside Adults Breathe and

Thrive, Nov 2013 – Oct 2016• Continued partnership with CHA• Able to implement established processes

with CHA from the previous project with much greater ease

28

29

Teamwork makes the dream work!

29

30

Acknowledgements• Chicago Housing Authority Team: Daniel

Cassell, Vorricia Harvey, Andy Teitelman, • Sinai Team: Kim Artis, Jeanette Avila, Jamie

Campbell, Sheena Freeman, Julie Kuhn, Melissa Gutierrez, Rhonda Lay, Helen Margellos-Anast, Pat Perkins, Jessica Ramsay, Gloria Seals, Dennis Vickers, Steve Whitman

• Funders: Department of Housing and Urban Development – Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control

• Partners: Chicago Housing Authority, Chicago Asthma Consortium, Health & Disability Advocates, Metropolitan Tenants Organization, Sinai Children’s Hospital, & Sinai Community Institute

• Participants and their families

31

Jessica Ramsay, MPH, AE-C

Intervention DirectorSinai Urban Health

InstituteSinai Health System NR7-

142Chicago, IL 60608

phone: 773-257-2745fax: 773-257-5347

Jessica.ramsay@sinai.org www.SUHIchicago.org