Post on 27-Dec-2019
transcript
1LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015
April 16, 2015
Land Use Committee Meeting 6APRIL 16, 2015
2LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015
April 16, 2015
Welcome
LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015 3
April 16, 2015
◦Meeting Minutes◦Open Space & Natural Resource (OSNR) Network
Refinement◦Corridor Land Use Scenario Refinement◦Plan Framework◦Cooperative Planning Strategy◦Next Steps◦Questions/Public Comment
Agenda
4LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015
April 16, 2015
Open Space & Natural Resource Network
LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015 5
April 16, 2015
Visual inspection and confirmation of accuracy Forests Grassland/Prairies Wetlands
Focus on protected lands and important natural resources to define OSNR Network
Review and input from conservation agencies and organizations
Will provide opportunities for detailed review by municipalities
OSNR Network Refinement
6
LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015
April 16, 2015
OSNR Network• Core natural
resources are foundation of network
• Include suggested connections and buffers
• Include additional open space goals and flexibility in how municipalities achieve the goals
LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015 7
April 16, 2015
Open Space & Natural Resource Network as Foundation of Plan and Strategy Agreement by LUC members on location and extent of
the Open Space Network would be a solid foundation of consensus
Concept may include tiers of OSNR resources, suggested buffers and connections, and acreage targets
There is general support for the concept by stakeholders
LUC discussion: What is the best way to achieve this?
OSNR Network
Core
Sensitive
Flex
8LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015
April 16, 2015
Land Use Scenario Refinement
9
LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015
April 16, 2015
Corridor Planning Zones◦ Zones will allow for
coordinated planning and balanced land use
◦ Focused on market analysis identified major gravity centers for office, retail and industrial uses
◦ Potential boundaries should consider clusters of communities
Potential Office
ExistingRetail
Existing Office
PotentialRetail
Potential Industrial*
* Includes areas of potential infill
10
LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015
April 16, 2015
Potential Planning Zones• Subareas for
defining land use balance within Corridor
• Each zone covers multiple municipalities to avoid being prescriptive to only one municipality
LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015 11
April 16, 2015
Planning Zones
• Allow for mapping of Open Space and Natural Resource network• Allow for plan to provide useful information to guide balanced development by
municipalities• Provide land use acreage or percentages that would result in a balanced land
use portfolio, but not specific locations for non-OSNR uses• Suggest a hierarchy of development types that may be appropriate for specific
locations, but allow market and competition to function
Balance economic development, open space, and community character goals across municipalities to encourage development of vibrant communities in central Lake County.
- Blue Ribbon Advisory CouncilRecommendation & Summary Report
LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015 12
April 16, 2015
Planning Zone A: Balanced Land Use Plan
Agricultural21%
Open Space42%
Utility/Waste3%
Institutional3%
Industrial3%
Office +/- 0%
Retail2%
Residential24%
Multi-family2%
2010 2040New Land Use Mix
Agricultural9%
Open Space32%
Institutional2%
Industrial16%
Office3%
Retail6%
Residential;23%
Townhomes6%
Multi-Family3%
Existing Zone A Land Use Totals (2010)
Portion of Zone A where land use
change is anticipated
LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015 13
April 16, 2015
Planning Zone A: Balanced Land Use Plan
Agricultural8%
Open Space42%
Utility/Waste2%
Institutional3%
Industrial7%
Office1%
Retail4%
Residential28%
Townhomes2%
Multi-Family3%
Zone A Proposed 2040 Land Use Mix
LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015 14
April 16, 2015
Planning Zone ADevelopment Targets
Floor Area Ratio Square Feet Employment
Density (Dwelling Units
Per Acre)Units Population
Industrial 0.18 to 0.2 7,280,000 to 8,000,000
9,700 to 10,700
Office 0.22 to 0.26 1,300,000 to 1,550,000 4,300 to 5,150
Retail 0.18 to 0.22 2,600,000 to 3,150,000 5,150 to 6,300
Mixed-Use
• Retail 0.18 to 0.2 60,000 to 66,500 120 to 130
• Office 0.22 to 0.26 73,000 to 86,500 240 to 290
• Multi-Family 12 to 18 90 to 140 250 to 390
Residential 2 to 4 840 to 1,690 2,350 to 4,730
Townhomes 6 to 12 660 to 1,320 1,850 to 3,700
Multi-Family 12 to 18 750 to 1,130 2,100 to 3,150
LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015 15
April 16, 2015
Planning ZonesPlanning Zones will include maps to provide guidance• Open Space and Natural Resource
Network features• Potential open space connections• Potential trail connections• Potential transit improvements• Potential roadway network
improvements
LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015 16
April 16, 2015
Planning Zones • Within Planning Zones, suggest appropriate
development typologies for specific locations, but not exact use or # of square feet
• Provide concept plans or other illustrations to communicate key elements
• Provide suggested recommendations and policies for how to approach development
Appropriate Development Typologies1. Neighborhood Retail Node2. Corporate Office Center3. Walkable Neighborhood4. Transit Node5. Industry/Logistics Center
Example
Neighborhood Retail Node
LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015 17
April 16, 2015
Typologies• Provide guidance and assist in
visualization of suggested development appropriate for specific locations
• Identify intent, intensity, and potential development standards and guidelines
LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015 18
April 16, 2015
(how would this work if not creating location-specific land use plan?) Places / Typologies
Places / Typologies
Intent Typical Use & Intensity
Development Standards & Guidelines (for example)
Priority Preserve Preserve and manage in perpetuity
Open Space Recommended preservation and management plans
Conservation Design Limited, conservation baseddevelopment
Residential; DU/AC depends on land carrying capacity
Cons Design, 100’ buffers on water features, native landscaping, stormwater runoff rate / volume targets, use of GI
Rural Living Low density residential Residential; DU/AC [range] Stormwater GI
Suburban Neighborhood Medium density residential Residential; DU/AC [range] stormwater runoff rate, volume; use of stormwater GI
Walkable Neighborhood High density residential; small format retail (e.g. corner grocer)
Mixed; DU/AC [range]; FAR [range]
Village Center Low-medium intensity mixed use Mixed; DU/AC [range]; FAR [range]
Infill development, sidewalks,complete streets, vertically and/or horiz. mixed-uses
Transit Node Higher intensity mixed use Mixed; DU/AC [range]; FAR [range]
Major Retail Node Goods, services, ED Retail; SF / FAR [range] …
Neighborhood Retail Node Goods, services, ED Retail; SF / FAR [range] …
Industry/Logistics Center Employment and ED Industrial; SF / FAR [range] …
Corporate Office Center Employment and ED Office; SF / FAR [range] …
Office / Industry Mixed
LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015 19
April 16, 2015
Plan Implementation FrameworkPlaces / Typologies Intent Target Use & Intensity Development Standards &
Guidelines (for example)
Conservation Design Limited, conservation based development
Residential; DU/AC depends on land carrying capacity
• Cons Design• 100’ buffers on water features• Native landscaping• Stormwater runoff rate and
volume targets• Use of GSI
Village Center Low-medium intensity mixed use
Mixed Office / Retail / Residential
• 8-16 DU/AC • FAR [range]• Employment??
• Transportation: Pedestrian priority (e.g., sidewalks); Complete streets; ,
• Economic Development: retail/ entertainment on ground floor and residential above
• Natural resources: green stormwater infrastructure
Major / Neighborhood RetailNode
Goods, services, ED Retail; SF / FAR [range] …
20LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015
April 16, 2015
Plan Framework
LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015 21
April 16, 2015
Plan Framework
Land Use and Development Policies & Guidelines
Land use balance and intensity targets for Corridor Planning Zones + suggested typologies(with flexibility to accommodate dynamic market and municipal competition)
Parcel-based Land Use Plan &
Development Guidelines
Plan Structure and Detail
Lower detail & specificity Higher detail & specificity
Open Space & Natural Resource Network
LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015 22
April 16, 2015
Elements of an Implementable Plan Make the case for a balanced approach to preservation and development
Establish an Open Space & Natural Resource Network, suggested connections and additions, and preservation strategies
Recommend types of transportation improvements necessary
Establish land use mix and intensity targets/ranges for Corridor Subzones
Identify suggested locations for places or typologies such as transit node, neighborhood retail, walkable downtown, etc.
Plan Framework
LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015 23
April 16, 2015
Elements of an Implementable Plan Provide specific, place-based preservation and development guidelines, policies,
standards, and recommendations to achieve Plan goals
Provide conceptual illustrations or other graphical representation of preferred development types
Recommend use of boundary agreements, service sharing agreements, revenue sharing agreements, and other means of collaboration
Specifies that municipalities Are key implementers of Plan Maintain land use decision-making authority Determine how to incorporate Plan recommendations and achieve land use
and intensity targets within local policies, plans, and regulations
Plan Framework
24LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015
April 16, 2015
Cooperative Planning Strategy
LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015 25
April 16, 2015
Desirable Elements Establish stakeholder commitment to Open Space & Natural Resource Network Consider OSNR District(s), multi-jurisdictional IGA, or other strategy
Provide guidelines, policies, etc. for land use and development decisions
Establish a coordinating body of member communities and stakeholders May be same body as for Environmental Restoration and Stewardship Fund
Provide for regular review and revision of Plan by coordinating body
Provide incentives to encourage decisions consistent with Plan Example: Access to $81 million ERSF fund
May include Corridor and/or local (multijurisdictional) agreements
Cooperative Planning Strategy
LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015 26
April 16, 2015
Cooperative Planning StrategySuggested Mechanisms• Memorandum of Understanding
• Adoption of Corridor Plan, policies, guidelines, and recommendations
• Adoption of Open Space & Natural Resource Network and strategy
• Intergovernmental Agreement(s) that incorporates elements of the Corridor Plan
• New Inter-jurisdictional Authority to oversee Plan and development
Examples of successful implementation of multijurisdictional corridor plans are hard to find, but most are built on intergovernmental agreements.
27LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015
April 16, 2015
DiscussionCOOPERATIVE PLANNING TOOLS
28LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015
April 16, 2015
Next Steps
LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015 29
April 16, 2015
Establish Working Groups
Open Space and Natural Resources
Cooperative Planning Strategy
LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015 30
April 16, 2015
Schedule & Milestones April 2015◦ LUC meeting◦ Municipal planning meetings◦ Refine open space network◦ Develop Planning Zone
recommendations and typologies◦ Establish Working Groups
May 2015◦ Possible LUC meeting◦ Municipal planning meetings as
needed◦ Refine Planning Zone
recommendations and typologies◦ Draft policy recommendations◦ Draft Plan development
June 2015◦ LUC Meeting◦ Final draft Corridor Plan and
recommendations◦ Public Open Houses
July & beyond 2015◦ Refine and finalize Corridor Plan◦ Additional LUC meeting(s) to approve
Corridor Plan◦ Municipal meetings and outreach
31LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015
April 16, 2015
Public Comment
32LAND USE COMMITTEEApril, 2015
April 16, 2015
Thank You