LIBERAL€¦ · LIBERAL . August 27, 2013 – Visionary Meeting 4 “Vision without action is a...

Post on 15-Aug-2020

1 views 0 download

transcript

LIBERAL

August 27, 2013 – Visionary Meeting 4

“Vision without action is a dream.

Action without vision is simply passing the time.

Action with Vision is making a positive difference.” -Joel Barker

USD 480

LIBERAL

Phase 1 – Complete

Phase 2 Begins: 1. Recap: Vision / Goals / Principles

2. Patron Survey Says

3. Financial Status of District

4. District “Feeder” System

5. Current School Rankings

6. Elementary Baseline

7. Schedule Update

USD 480

LIBERAL

Vision Goals

Guiding Principles

USD 480

LIBERAL

USD 480 Vision Statement:

USD 480

USD 480 will Prepare Students for Real-Life Experiences by Establishing a Personalized Educational Setting in a Creative, Collaborative and Technology Rich Learning Environment PreK-12th Grades.

In one sentence – based on all the current information; What is our “Guide for current and future courses of action?”

LIBERAL

USD 480 Goals

USD 480

An observable and measureable end result, having one or more objectives to be achieved within a more or less fixed timeframe.

TOP 3: All-Day Kindergarten Students given tools to apply to a career or prepared for college Less Students per teacher (more individual student attention) Financially Responsible Pre-K for all Students Lesson Transitions Larger Classrooms Sharing of District Resources with Community Organizations More Services / Programs Global Learning Opportunities

LIBERAL

USD 480

Guiding Principles:

USD 480

will help focus the work of the committee and clarify important decisions when individual interests and desires come in conflict with the overall goal. They will serve as the filter through which important decisions are made. They will keep the project on track and focused on core values and purposes.

Top 3: Pepare students for life Environments promote safety and security for the users Technology Rich Schools Integral to the Community Flexibility for Students Financially Efficient Parity and Equity in School Facilities Global / World Class Education Decisions which consider all stakeholders Sharing of District Resources with Community

LIBERAL

2013

Patron Telephone Survey

USD 480

LIBERAL USD 480

Survey Parameters

• 365 Randomly selected residents of USD 480 • Week long survey late June 2013 • Statistically valid margin of Error of +/- 5% • 85% of respondents have lived in district > than 10 years

LIBERAL USD 480

4 Survey Take-Aways: 1. 60 to 90% of the respondents support the 5 needs

discussed: • Storm Shelters • Classroom Expansions (no Modulars • Upgrade Security • All-day Kindergarten • Offer Pre-K

2. The structure of the financing is as important, if not more so, than the solution • Funding preferred by a sales tax or combination sales /

property tax • Primary reason is to spread the financial burden

LIBERAL USD 480

4 Survey Take-Aways: 3. General preference for renovation over building new but

a healthy % said it depends on the situation.

4. Patrons have an active interest in district news • 9 different sources consulted by at least 25% of the

respondents. • Friends and neighbors / newspaper 2 top sources

LIBERAL

Financial Status

USD 480

PiperJaffray USD 480’s: Bond Underwriter

LIBERAL USD 480

LIBERAL USD 480

LIBERAL USD 480

LIBERAL USD 480

LIBERAL USD 480

LIBERAL USD 480

LIBERAL USD 480

How much will your community support in additional taxes per month?

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

10%

27%

12%

10%

12%

29%1. $2.50

2. $5.00

3. $8.00

4. $10.00

5. $12.00

6. No Way! No How!

If financing is a combination of property tax and state aid at 49%, (no sales tax included) would the community support the bond referendum?

1. 2. 3.

41%

24%

34%1. Yes

2. No Way

3. Don’t Know

Is it important to survey the community prior to the bond referendum?

1. 2.

15%

85%1. Yes

2. No

LIBERAL USD 480

Facility Assessments

Scoring: • 1 Bad • 2 Poor • 3 Fair • 4 Good • 5 Excellent

C

am

pu

s E

va

lu

atio

n

Ove

ra

ll C

am

pu

s S

co

re

Your perception of Garfield Elementary physical facility condition?

A. Good Condition – No work

B. Marginal Improvement – A addition

C. Extensive Improvement – Additions and system replacements

D. Total Replacement of Structure

E. Don’t Know

Good Con

dition –

No...

Margina

l Impro

vemen

t..

Extensiv

e Impr

ovem

e..

Total R

eplac

emen

t of ..

.

Don’t K

now

2%12% 10%

15%

61%

Your perception of Lincoln Elementary physical facility condition?

A. Good Condition – No work

B. Marginal Improvement – A addition

C. Extensive Improvement – Additions and system replacements

D. Total Replacement of Structure

E. Don’t Know

Good Con

dition –

No...

Margina

l Impro

vemen

t..

Extensiv

e Impr

ovem

e..

Total R

eplac

emen

t of ..

.

Don’t K

now

18%

75%

3%0%5%

Your perception of MacArthur Elementary physical facility condition?

A. Good Condition – No work

B. Marginal Improvement – A addition

C. Extensive Improvement – Additions and system replacements

D. Total Replacement of Structure

E. Don’t Know

Good Con

dition –

No...

Margina

l Impro

vemen

t..

Extensiv

e Impr

ovem

e..

Total R

eplac

emen

t of ..

.

Don’t K

now

12%

44%

0%

10%

34%

Your perception of McDermott Elementary physical facility condition?

A. Good Condition – No work

B. Marginal Improvement – A addition

C. Extensive Improvement – Additions and system replacements

D. Total Replacement of Structure

E. Don’t Know

Good Con

dition –

No...

Margina

l Impro

vemen

t..

Extensiv

e Impr

ovem

e..

Total R

eplac

emen

t of ..

.

Don’t K

now

5%

17%

2%

24%

51%

Your perception of McKinley Elementary physical facility condition?

A. Good Condition – No work

B. Marginal Improvement – A addition

C. Extensive Improvement – Additions and system replacements

D. Total Replacement of Structure

E. Don’t Know

Good Con

dition –

No...

Margina

l Impro

vemen

t..

Extensiv

e Impr

ovem

e..

Total R

eplac

emen

t of ..

.

Don’t K

now

7%

51%

0%2%

39%

Your perception of Southlawn Elementary physical facility condition?

A. Good Condition – No work

B. Marginal Improvement – A addition

C. Extensive Improvement – Additions and system replacements

D. Total Replacement of Structure

E. Don’t Know

Good Con

dition –

No...

Margina

l Impro

vemen

t..

Extensiv

e Impr

ovem

e..

Total R

eplac

emen

t of ..

.

Don’t K

now

8%

45%

3%

10%

35%

Your perception of Washington Elementary physical facility condition?

A. Good Condition – No work

B. Marginal Improvement – A addition

C. Extensive Improvement – Additions and system replacements

D. Total Replacement of Structure

E. Don’t Know

Good Con

dition –

No...

Margina

l Impro

vemen

t..

Extensiv

e Impr

ovem

e..

Total R

eplac

emen

t of ..

.

Don’t K

now

3% 5%0%

49%43%

Scoring: • 1 Bad • 2 Poor • 3 Fair • 4 Good • 5 Excellent

C

am

pu

s E

va

lu

atio

n

Ove

ra

ll C

am

pu

s S

co

re

Your perception of the intermediate physical facilities condition (Cottonwood /

Sunflower)? A. Good Condition – No

work

B. Marginal Improvement – A addition

C. Extensive Improvement – Additions and system replacements

D. Total Replacement of Structure

E. Don’t Know

Good Con

dition –

No...

Margina

l Impro

vemen

t..

Extensiv

e Impr

ovem

e..

Total R

eplac

emen

t of ..

.

Don’t K

now

50% 48%

0%0%3%

Your perception of the South Middle School physical facility condition?

A. Good Condition – No work

B. Marginal Improvement – A addition

C. Extensive Improvement – Additions and system replacements

D. Total Replacement of Structure

E. Don’t Know

Good Con

dition –

No...

Margina

l Impro

vemen

t..

Extensiv

e Impr

ovem

e..

Total R

eplac

emen

t of ..

.

Don’t K

now

5%

28%

0%

20%

48%

Your perception of the West Middle School physical facility condition?

A. Good Condition – No work

B. Marginal Improvement – A addition

C. Extensive Improvement – Additions and system replacements

D. Total Replacement of Structure

E. Don’t Know

Good Con

dition –

No...

Margina

l Impro

vemen

t..

Extensiv

e Impr

ovem

e..

Total R

eplac

emen

t of ..

.

Don’t K

now

2%

24%

0%

24%

50%

Your perception of the High School physical facilities condition?

A. Good Condition – No work

B. Marginal Improvement – A addition

C. Extensive Improvement – Additions and system replacements

D. Total Replacement of Structure

E. Don’t Know

Good Con

dition –

No...

Margina

l Impro

vemen

t..

Extensiv

e Impr

ovem

e..

Total R

eplac

emen

t of ..

.

Don’t K

now

7%

41%

0%

7%

44%

LIBERAL USD 480

District Organization

Grade Level Distribution

LIBERAL

Defining an Elementary School

Understanding Design Capacity: • There often is a mismatch between the capacity

of school buildings and the number of students in those buildings. Schools that exceed their design capacity experience increased wear and tear. And schools that are under-enrolled have to spend more in operations and maintenance than is necessary.

– American School & University Magazine

• Understanding the District’s Educational Goals and Expectations is the “Key to Balance Design Capacity”

LIBERAL

Keys to Design Capacity Understanding: • The building is a fixed item — capacity is

determined by factors subject to change, such as use of a teaching station, building and occupancy codes, scheduling and curriculum.

• The initial design capacity can become outdated when programs and physical environments change. (such as the inclusion of Special Ed Services when not planned for)

• A classroom utilization study will reflect the building's functional capacity.

LIBERAL

Design Capacity: • The number of students a school can

hold based on a District’s desired classroom student to teacher ratio (STR) and educational programs OR a desired Square Foot per Student ratio based on programs

Building Capacity: • The maximum number of occupants allowed

based on building and occupancy codes adopted by the local jurisdictional authorities

What is Capacity?

LIBERAL

LIBERAL

Current Feeder System:

LHS Enrollment: 1267 Capacity: 1300

Lincoln E: 215 C: 204

Wshngtn E: 144 C: 144

McDermt. E: 301 C: 285

McKinley E: 208 C: 225

Southlwn

E: 314 C: 285

MacArthur E: 215 C: 186

Garfield

E: 242 C: 231

Intermediate4-6th – 390 per Gr Lvl (23/class)

South Enrollment: 318 Capacity: 450

Elem. 1-3rd 399 / Gr Lvl (20/class)

Sunflower Enrollment: 578 Capacity: 624

Cottonwood Enrollment: 626 Capacity: 624

Middle 7-8th – 342 per Gr Lvl (25/class)

West Enrollment: 369 Capacity: 475

34,870sf

90,000 sf

32,7302sf

92,452 sf

36,203sf 24,900sf 24,122sf

92,872 sf

235,448 sf

77,735 sf

38,487sf 30,468sf

LIBERAL

LIBERAL

LIBERAL

Currently: Mix of Sections / 7 - K3 Schools

Elementary School Models Capacity 1676 1700 2-Section 178 Students: 9.4 9.5 (10) 3-Section 258 Students: 6.5 6.6 (7) 4-Section 336 Students: 5.0 5.1 (5)

K

-3

P

ro

gra

m

• Current Enrollment is: 1676 Stds

• Projected 13/14 Enrollment of: 1640 Stds

• Projected 17/18 Enrollment of: 1658 Stds

LIBERAL

Elementary School Models Enrollment Available Classrooms Kindergarten 479 Students: 26 needed Grade Level 1,197 Students: +8 18 Kindergarten Classrooms Needed (Avg 3 more per school)

K

-3

P

ro

gra

m

• Current Classrooms Available: 76

• Kindergarten 11

• Grade Levels 1 – 3 65

LIBERAL

Current Feeder System:

LHS Enrollment: 1267 Capacity: 1300

Lincoln E: 215 C: 204

Wshngtn E: 144 C: 144

McDermt. E: 301 C: 285

McKinley E: 208 C: 225

Southlwn

E: 314 C: 285

MacArthur E: 215 C: 186

Garfield

E: 242 C: 231

Intermediate4-6th – 390 per Gr Lvl (23/class)

South Enrollment: 318 Capacity: 450

Elem. 1-3rd 399 / Gr Lvl (20/class)

Sunflower Enrollment: 578 Capacity: 624

Cottonwood Enrollment: 626 Capacity: 624

Middle 7-8th – 342 per Gr Lvl (25/class)

West Enrollment: 369 Capacity: 475

34,870sf

90,000 sf

32,7302sf

92,452 sf

36,203sf 24,900sf 24,122sf

92,872 sf

235,448 sf

77,735 sf

38,487sf 30,468sf

Would you consider grade level re-organization to achieve collaboration

and district efficiencies at all grade levels?

A. Yes

B. No

C. Existing system is OK

D. Don’t know

E. Don’t Understand Yes No

Existin

g syste

m is O

K

Don’t k

now

Don’t U

nderst

and

55%

18%

3%11%13%

If you are in support of district grade level re-organization what would you

support? A. PreK – 5 / 6-8 / 9-12

B. K-5 / 6-8 / 9-12

C. K-5 / 6-8 / 9 / 10-12

D. K-3 / 4-6 / 7-8 / 9-12

E. K-6 / 7-8 / 9-12

F. K-4 / 5-6 / 7-8 / 9-12

G. Other

PreK –

5 / 6-

8 / 9-

12

K-5 / 6

-8 / 9

-12

K-5 / 6

-8 / 9

/ 10-1

2

K-3 / 4

-6 / 7

-8 / 9

-12

K-6 / 7

-8 / 9

-12

K-4 / 5

-6 / 7

-8 / 9

-12Oth

er

29%

17%

7%

17%

7%7%

15%

Please rank the 7 areas of improvements in order of importance

to the community: 1. High School

2. Middle School

3. Intermediate Schools

4. Elementary Schools

5. PreK / Kindergarten

6. All Schools

7. Other (athletics / Support services

8. None High School

Middle Sch

ool

Intermed

iate S

chools

Elemen

tary S

chools

PreK / K

inderg

arten

All Sch

ools

Other

(athle

tics /

Suppo..

None

15%

17%

12%

4%5%

10%

19%19%

What of the following choices would you consider for schools? A. All schools remain as is B. Only add space for

enrollment / capacity C. Improve Schools to meet

goals and guiding principles (most expensive)

D. Do the least expensive option, no matter what it is

E. Only address the 5 needs identified in the survey

F. Don’t know G. Not enough information

All sch

ools rem

ain as

is

Only ad

d spa

ce fo

r en...

Impr

ove S

chools

to m

...

Do the l

east

expe

nsiv...

Only ad

dres

s the 5

n...

Don’t k

now

Not en

ough in

formati

on

0%

15%

55%

3%0%

10%

18%

LIBERAL USD 480

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

Define Models Based on Number of Sections

LIBERAL

Currently: Mix of Sections / 7 - K3 Schools

Elementary School Models Capacity 2505 ? 2-Section 274 Students: 9.1 ? (9) 3-Section 402 Students: 6.2 ? (7) 4-Section 528 Students: 4.7 ? (5)

K

-5

P

ro

gra

m

• Current Enrollment is: 2505 Stds

• Projected 13/14 Enrollment of: ? Stds

• Projected 17/18 Enrollment of: 2042 Stds

LIBERAL USD 480

• 4 Section K-5 (approx. 74,700 sf)

– Enrollment Design Capacity – 528 Students • 20 General Classrooms • 4 Kindergarten Classrooms

• 2 Section K-5 (approx. 48,800 sf)

– Enrollment Design Capacity – 274 Students • 10 General Classrooms • 2 Kindergarten Classrooms

• 3 Section K-5 (approx. 65,772 sf)

– Enrollment Design Capacity – 402 Students • 15 General Classrooms • 3 Kindergarten Classrooms

LIBERAL

2,200 SF 350 SF 450 SF 850 SF 21,200 SF 1,275 SF 1,590 SF 2,600 SF 2,375 SF 3,850 SF 1,000 SF 6,500 SF 3,644 SF 3,900 SF 2,375 SF 54,159 SF 20,541 SF 74,700 SF

1. Administrative / Student Services 2. Guidance / Counseling 3. Nurse / Health 4. Staff Planning Centers / Wrk Rm. 5. Instructional Spaces

a. Kindergarten b. First Grade c. Second Grade d. Third Grade e. Fourth Grade f. Fifth Grade

6. Discovery Areas (3 @ 425sf) 7. Restrooms (6 @ 265sf) 8. Elective Classrooms (Art / Music) 9. Special Needs Classrooms 10. Media Center 11. Computer Resource 12. Physical Education 13. Food Service 14. Dining 15. Building Support TOTAL NET Square Footage: Circulation, Partitions : TOTAL GROSS Square Footage:

K5

- 4

S

ec

tio

n P

ro

gra

m

LIBERAL

Current Feeder System:

LHS Enrollment: 1267 Capacity: 1300

Lincoln E: 215 C: 204

Wshngtn E: 144 C: 144

McDermt. E: 301 C: 285

McKinley E: 208 C: 225

Southlwn

E: 314 C: 285

MacArthur E: 215 C: 186

Garfield

E: 242 C: 231

Intermediate4-6th – 390 per Gr Lvl (23/class)

South Enrollment: 318 Capacity: 450

Elem. 1-3rd 399 / Gr Lvl (20/class)

Sunflower Enrollment: 578 Capacity: 624

Cottonwood Enrollment: 626 Capacity: 624

Middle 7-8th – 342 per Gr Lvl (25/class)

West Enrollment: 369 Capacity: 475

34,870sf

90,000 sf

32,7302sf

92,452 sf

36,203sf 24,900sf 24,122sf

92,872 sf

235,448 sf

77,735 sf

38,487sf 30,468sf

LIBERAL

Elementary: Existing vs. New

Items Existing New Program

Site Acreage < 3 acres 12 to 15 acres

Parking Counts / Access Not Adequate 45 staff / 20 visitor

Outdoor Phys Ed Limited / to None Grass / Hard Play Areas

Accessibility Minimal Provided

Vehicular Separation Not Provided Provided

Safety / Security As Allowed by Infrastr Integrated w/ Design

Classroom Size Average 763 sf Average 900 sf

Music / Art 640 - 940 sf (classrm) 1,100 sf (ea)

Classroom Arrangements As Allowed by Infrastr Integrated w/ Design

Media Center Size / Location 800 to 1400 sf classrm 3,850 sf

Gym Recreational Area Shared w/ Commons 6500 sf dedicated sp

Commons / Kitchen 1,500 sf (approx.) 7,500 sf dedicated sp

LIBERAL

Next Steps

USD 480

Aug 27 15 July 23