Post on 30-Dec-2015
transcript
Budget Comparison
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1400000
Continuing Cost Items
One-Time Cost Items
Print →Electronic
All print except five that were available in electronic format are being transferred.
Those five were the expensive ones (ca $26,000 to transfer)
Will not see most results until January 83% of the journals will be electronic
Packages
Elsevier College Collections Purchased 3 collections 2,660 titles for $31,800 by cancelling 33
titles in the packages for a net gain of 2,627 titles and net savings of $9,033.
PsycArticles Package has 63 titles for $11,772 by cancelling 16 journals in
the package for a net gain of 47 titles for only $273.60
Project Muse
With savings will be purchasing the premium package which has additional 81titles for $5,670
Collection → CONTENT
2005 Information brokerage started 13 journals with 31 uses for 6 months
(62 for year) Cost $19,667 ($20,000 with preservation) Cost per use $317.21 Equity for all (faculty had $27,000 for articles) Originally only articles Items added almost immediately
First Year
Purchased 722 content sources for a cost of $22,879.23
327 Articles via Information Broker 144 Items for the Collection via Information Broker 250 Articles paid via Interlibrary Loan
Average cost of $31.69
July 2005 though April 2008
Purchased 2,619 content sources for a cost of $73,633.32.
Average cost $28.16 1,269 IB articles for a cost of $39,787.06 for an
average cost of $31.35 555 IB items added to collection for a cost of
$22,696.36 for an average cost of $40.89 795 paid ILL articles for a cost of $11,149.90 for an
average cost of $14.03
2008/2009 Year
Letters to chairs about cancelling journals with 10 or less uses since January 2005.
Potential journals to cut was 339 Journals actually cut was 280 Used for covering inflation as no new for
continuing cost items
Who Uses Information Broker
2005/062006/07
Fac. Articles 181 244
Fac. Items 49 51
U. Stud. Articles 263 200
U. Stud. Items 30 40
G. Stud. Articles 58 131
G. Stud. Items 13 16
Variables in Formulas
Credit hours Courses Number of majors Number of faculty Number of graduates Cost of materials Use of collection
“The best formula is one that quantifies need with the minimum number of variables since each variable adds time and expense of data collection as well as the number of calculations that must be made to implement the formula.” David Shappert
Source: Tuten, Jane H. and Beverly Jones, Allocation Formulas in Academic Libraries, American Library Association, 1995.
Formula
X = A + 2B + 3C + D +2E
9
Where X = Departmental allocation
A = Lower division courses
B = Upper division courses
C = Credit hours
D = Cost of books
E = Cost of serialsNo department could lose or gain more than 5%.
Library Materials Budget Formula Subcommittee 2002/2003
Clinton HewanYasue Kawahara
Kathy SchroerluckeLois Schultz
Formula
X = A + 2B +2.5C + 3D + E +2F
11.5
X = Departmental allocation
A = Percentage of university’s lower division courses generated by the department
B = Percentage of the university’s upper division courses generated by the department
C = Percentage of graduate courses generated by the department
D = Percentage of the university’s student credit hours generated by the department
E = Percentage of the average cost of books published in all subject areas by the average cost of books published in the department’s subject area
F = Percentage of the average cost of periodicals published in all subject area by the average cost of periodicals published in the department’s subject area
Since 2003
Continuing cost items removed from departmental allocation
Programs versus Departments New policy on purchasing journals
Electronic format Multidiscipline packages Cost per use model Information Brokerage Service
GOAL
“A balanced collection proportionally reflects all the programs, instruction and research conducted in an institution.” David Genaway
Source: Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory, Vol. 10, pp. 287-292, 1986.
KYVL Databases Cut Professional Development Collection Health Source Nursing Religion & Philosophy Collection Military & Government Collection Computing Literary Reference Center Biography Reference Bank Article First Papersfirst World Almanac Proceedings First Clase and Periodica ECO Electronic Books by OCLC WorldCat Dissertations and Theses.
Budget Comparison 2001 – 2009
Year Cont One-Time Budget DepartmentalOne-Time Cost
2001/02 551,572 232,426 783,998 242,2072002/03 659,890 124,108 783,998 87,7252003/04 681,632 142,366 823,998 110,0002004/05 756,333 189,765 946,098 110,0002005/06 836,559 309,539 1,146,098 169,0002006/07 870,450 261,148 1,131,598 169,0002007/08 934,712 312,886 1,247,598 189,0002008/09 934,969 312,629 1,247,598 189,000