Making Sense of Streamflow Data along the Lower Crooked ......Making Sense of Streamflow Data along...

Post on 19-Aug-2020

2 views 0 download

transcript

Making Sense of Streamflow Data along the Lower Crooked and

Middle Deschutes Rivers

Greg Olsen, Hydrologic TechnicianGlen Hess, Oregon Surface Water Specialist

U.S. Geological SurveyOregon WSC

May 2007

Funding and/or Assistance Sources

• Bureau of Land Management - Prineville• Crooked River Watershed Council • Oregon Water Resource Department• Portland General Electric

Project Goal - Seepage Investigation

• Define the temporal and spatial variability of groundwater discharge (seepage) to the rivers.

• We quantify that seepage by measuring streamflow at various points along the river and calculating the gain or loss between those points.

• Seepage investigations are made during periods of low flow when conditions at any given location in the stream are relatively constant so as to minimize the effects that any variability with time might introduce.

Area of Study

Opal Springs Gage

RM 19

RM 6.8RM 120

RM 133

How Do We Measure Flow?• Historically made using Price AA current meter• Cross-section perpendicular to flow

• Cableway• Boat• Bridge• Wade – Couple of sites on Deschutes were waded

• 25 sections desirable• Measure depth, width and water velocity• Width x Depth = Area• Area x Vel. = section discharge• Combine sections for total discharge• .5 - 2 hours, depending on depth

Price AA Current Meter

Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter

•Has become the instrument of choice for wading

•For wadingmeasurements only

•All electronic –no moving parts

Acoustic Doppler Profiler

• All Electronic• Measures entire

profile• Operated

remotely via radio

• 30-40 min

Trailhead Packing

Typical Gear • Dry Suit or Boat(s)• PFD• Fins• 300’ rope for tag line• 2 - 150’ pull ropes• 2-way radios• Sat. phone• GPS• Laptop Table• Tarp• Umbrella

• ADP• Pontoons• Spare ADP Batteries• ADP Radio• Laptop• Laptop Power Source• Sub. Pres. X-ducer• Palmtop• Temp. Thermistor• Temp/Cond Meter• Personal Items (food)• Grab sample bottles

Packing It In – The Easy Part

Bushwhacking

Tracking changes in stage

Setting up the Tagline

Inflatable raft

Kayaks

Set up to measure

Acoustic Doppler Profiler

Brains and radio

Transducer

From moving measurementsto

stationary measurements

Moving• Bottom tracking• At least 4 passes, often

8-12 (Couple of hours)• Susceptible to moving

bed conditions

Stationary• No bottom tracking• Minimum 25 sections

like a standard QM• Generally 30-40 min.• Moving bed not an

issue

Collecting data

Organized chaos.Everyone has a job, if only to serve as a mule.

The tough part - packing it out

New GageCrooked River blwOsborne Canyon

RM 13.5

RM 6.8RM 120

RM 133

RM 19

Opal Springs Gage

The Gage

•Heavy hardware flown in by BLM contracted helicopter

• Data logger records stage & water temperature

•Self purging pressure transducer

•Radio x-mits to satellite logger on canyon rim

•X-mits to satellite

•Data x-mitted hourly

BOC

Gage location

Measuring Flow from Bank Operated Cableway (BOC)

QUESTIONS?

Making Sense of Streamflow Data along the Lower Crooked and

Middle Deschutes Rivers

Greg Olsen, Hydrologic TechnicianGlen Hess, Oregon Surface Water Specialist

U.S. Geological SurveyOregon WSC

May 2007

Hint: The systems are ground water driven in this peculiar river (Russell,

1905)

Stearns – USGS Water Supply Paper (1931)

“…though many records exist, it is difficult to compare them … because

they were not all maintained at the same time. “

USGS Streamflow Data•Continuous Data

(Crooked - Terrebonne, Osborne, Opal Springs)

(Deschutes – Below Bend, Lower Bridge, Culver)

Osborne Canyon gageRM 13.5

RM 6.8RM 120

RM 133

RM 19

Opal Springs GageCulver Gage

Terrebonne gage RM 27.7

Crooked R Point Streamflow Data

National Grasslands (RM 16.5)Horny Hollow (RM 9.2)Carcass Trail (RM 8.4)Whiner Rock (RM 7.7)

Crooked River Seepage Run 2003

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

051015202530River Mile

FLO

W, I

N C

FS

Terrebonne

Osborne

Opal Springs

Historic Crooked River Seepage

Runs1919, 1925

(This photo from USGS - John

Wesley Powell on Colo.)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

051015202530River Mile

FLO

W, I

N C

FS

1925

1919

2003

Historic Crooked River Seepage Runs

Terrebonne

Cove

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

051015202530

River Mile

Mar. 2003 Jul. 2004

Sept. 2004 Oct. 2004Aug. 2005 Aug. 2006

Terrebonne

FLO

W, I

N C

FSCrooked Streamflow Data 2003-06

Questions ?

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

051015202530 River Mile

Mar. 2003

May 2006

FLO

W, I

N C

FS

Terrebonne

Crooked River at High Stage

Osborne Canyon gageRM 13.5

RM 6.8RM 120

RM 19

Opal Springs GageCulver Gage

Terrebonne gage RM 27.7

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

YEAR

Crooked River late summer gains from Terrebonne to Opal Springs

GA

INS,

IN

CFS

From Gannett (2002)

Figure 23. August mean flows of the Crooked River below Opal Springs, the Metolius River near Grandview, and estimated annual mean leakage from irrigation canals, 1905-1997.

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

2,000

1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

YEAR

CU

BIC

FEE

T PE

R S

ECO

Estimated mean annual canal leakage

August mean flow - Metolius River near Grandview

August mean flow - Crooked River near Culver

August mean flow - Crooked River below Opal

Osborne Canyon gageRM 13.5

RM 6.8

RM 19

Culver Gage

Terrebonne gage RM 27.7

Horny Hollow

Carcass Trail RM 8.4

Questions ?

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

YEAR

Crooked Gains - Osborne to CarcassG

AIN

S, I

N C

FS

Crooked River Monthly Flows

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Oct

Nov

Dec Ja

n

Feb

Mar

Apr

May Ju

n

Jul

Aug

Sep

Terrebonne

Osborne Canyon

Opal Springs

MEA

N M

ON

THLY

FLO

W, I

N C

FS

Osborne Canyon gageRM 13.5

RM 6.8RM 120

RM 133

RM 19

Opal Springs GageCulver Gage

Terrebonne gage RM 27.7

Lower Bridge

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

110120130140150160170 River Mile

1992 seepage

1994 seepage

2005 USGS seepage

2005 OWRD/USGS

Middle Deschutes Historic Seepage RunsFL

OW

, IN

CFS

Lower B

ridge

Culver

Below

Bend

Osborne Canyon gage

RM 120

Opal Springs GageCulver Gage

Terrebonne gage Lower Bridge

Above Whychus

RM 133

Riffle Lane

Middle Deschutes River Gains

0

5

10

15

20

25

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

YEAR

gains Lower Bridge (RM 133.5) toRiffle Lane (RM 130.5)

GAINS

GA

INS,

IN C

FS

Questions ?Middle Deschutes River Gains

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

YEAR

gains above Whychus (RM 123.3) toCulver (RM 120.6)

GA

INS,

IN

CFS

0200400600800

1000120014001600

Oct

Nov

Dec Ja

nFe

bM

arA

prM

ayJu

nJu

lA

ugS

ep

Below Bend

Lower Bridge

Culver

Middle Deschutes River Monthly FlowsM

EAN

MO

NTH

LY F

LOW

, IN

CFS

MONTH

In summary, its focusing on each reach groundwater gain

Additional Streamflow Study Ideas

•Flow duration values•Temporal trends

•Mine and analyze other data

Let’s look at Temperature data

•Published data•Unpublished data

Hint: Making sense of the data set we have

Crooked River Water TemperaturesCrooked River Water Temperatures

0

5

10

15

20

25

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep

Month

max Osborne (RM 13.4)

max Opal Springs (RM 6.7)

Tem

pera

ture

, in

degr

ees C

Opal Springs

Caldwell (1998) - Opal Springs water temperature are 10 C

Springs in theCrooked River Canyon

Middle Deschutes Water Temperature Data

Deschutes River Water Temperatures

0

5

10

15

20

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep

Month

max below Bend (RM 164.3)

max near Culver (RM 120.1)

Tem

pera

ture

, in

degr

ees C

Additional Temperature Study Ideas

•Mine and analyze other data •Temporal trends ?

•Ground truth Flir data •Re-establish Osborne temperature

collection

Oregon has come a long way since Russell, Stearns and 2003…..

In summary ……

Since Russell (1905) definition, we are better quantifying the ground water gains at each reach of these rivers

Web Resources

OR USGS Data Web Page : http://pubs.usgs.gov/wdr/

USGS Deschutes Page: http://or.water.usgs.gov/projs_dir/deschutes_gw/

Questions ?

Gannett and Lite (2002) Enhancements ?

1. Incorporate recent collected data

2. Improve stream gain loss calibration in Gannett groundwater model

3. Incorporate water quality into Gannett model

Flow Data Uncertainty

Excellent (within 2 percent) Good (within 5 percent)Fair (within 8 percent)

Poor (greater than 8 percent)

Temperature Data Uncertainty

0.1 degrees in 2007

2.0 degrees in 1964 (Moore)