Post on 16-Aug-2020
transcript
2AKADEMIYA
003
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Staples Food Prices in Local Markets: The Case of Millet Markets in Senegal
Covid-19 BulletinLOCAL STAPLE FOOD MARKET DYNAMICS
UNDER COVID
For that purpose, it compares actual monthly prices with predicted prices that would have prevailed based on seasonal patterns and historical price data from January 2010 to December 2019. Price comparisons are carried out for twenty-eight local markets in both millet surplus and defi cit areas over the fi rst semester of 2020. Price data used in the study was obtained from Senegal’s Market Information System. In addition, price correlations among local markets are analyzed to explore the extent to which the connectivity between markets helps explain observed patterns of actual price deviations from predicted levels. The fi ndings summarized below focus on the period from March to June, in the aftermath
The pandemic is likely to be more disruptive to local food markets and thus have more serious eff ects on the poorest and most vulnerable groups and communities than any of the crises in recent years. This is because the poor and vulnerable are aff ected by changes in local food staple prices signifi cantly more than other population groups, not only because of more limited purchasing power but also because of diff erences in consumption baskets. Moreover, domestic markets for local food staples such as yam, cassava, white maize, cowpeas, millet or sorghum tend to behave diff erently during times of crisis than global markets for major commodities such as rice, wheat or yellow maize. For instance, the last global food price crisis had much more signifi cant impacts on the latter group of food commodities. Local food staples markets tend to be rather segmented from global food markets. Staple food prices therefore tend to be isolated from global market shocks. The diff erence with Covid is that the disruption of food supply chains has hit both domestic and global food markets rather badly.
The global nature and complex ramifi cations of the pandemic make it impossible to avoid the pain from rising food prices, in particular among vulnerable groups. Diff erent staples weigh diff erently in local diets. Diff erent communities are aff ected diff erently by changes in prices of diff erent staples. Some markets are more connected than others and therefore price changes for the same staple food vary across geography and over time. Consequently, a good understanding of how local staples markets behave and close tracking of changes in food prices at community level have to be key elements of any strategy to protect livelihoods. AKADEMIYA2063 scientists and their partners are working to ensure that governments and other national stakeholders have suffi cient information to plan and respond to the eff ects of the pandemic on local markets.
This bulletin examines the short-run eff ects of the COVID-19 pandemic on millet prices across local markets in Senegal.
AKADEMIYA2063 - August 10 /August 17 -2020
ALGERIAEGYPTlibya
mali nigermauritania
chad sudan
ethiopianigeria
democraticrepublic
of the congo
angola
namibiabotswana
southafrica
zinbabwe
zambia
mozambique
madagascar
tanzania
kenyasomalia
uganda
central africa republic
cameroon
burundi
rwandagabon
malawi
morocco
senegal
EquatorialGuinea
republicof the congo
guinea
Eritrea
westernsahara
sierraleone
Guinea-Bissau
liberia
ivorycoast
burkina faso
ghana
togo
benin
tunisia
of measures taken to curb the propagation of the pandemic, in particular restrictions of travel between districts or departments. Detailed results are presented in Table 1 in the appendix.
Measures to curb the pandemic have raised prices in a growing number of local markets
The eff ects of COVID-19 and the related government actions are observable from the behavior of millet prices between March and June across local markets. As would be expected, restrictions enacted in March to limit the movement of people, which in turn aff ected the movement of goods, pushed millet prices below their predicted levels in many surplus area markets,
The Expertise We Need. The Africa We Want.
Ousmane Badiane, Executive Chairperson
Maurice Taondyandé, M&E Specialist, ReSAKSS West Africa; Anatole Goundan, Senior Associate Scientist, AKADEMIYA2063; Sunday Odjo, Deputy Director, Knowledge Systems Department, AKADEMIYA2063; and Mbaye Yade, Regional Coordinator, ReSAKSS West Africa.
while the opposite was observed in deficit area markets. Over time, the price increases spread to more markets as the pandemic spread and restrictions to market activities took hold. Figure 1, for instance, shows that the proportion of markets that actually recorded higher than predicted prices increased steadily from March to May 2020, when the confinement measures were in full force. From 50 percent in March, the proportion rose to 86 percent in April and reached 100 percent in
May. However, this trend started to reverse following the easing of restrictions in June, when the proportion of markets with higher than predicted prices fell to 75 percent.
The surge in prices intensified across markets as the restrictions took hold
The distribution of the magnitudes of price deviations across all rural markets is explored in Figure 2. In March 2020 (see the left pie chart), up to two-thirds (67%) of rural markets under consideration showed very modest price deviations from predicted levels, within the -5 to +5 per-
cent interval. Less than 10 percent of all markets experienced price devi-ations from predictions that were higher than 15 percent. The pandemic and related government meaures had not yet significantly affected the movement of goods and people. In contrast, by June (see the right pie chart), almost a half (46 percent) of all markets showed price deviations that were higher than 15 percent, while the share of markets with mod-est price deviations decreased to 31 percent, compared to 67 percent in March.
A moderate to normal increase in the price of millet in surplus area markets.
As shown in Figure 3, millet prices behaved somewhat differently across surplus area markets but exhibit a general upward trend. From April to May, when the confinement measures were in place, millet prices increased moderately in markets in surplus areas such as Kaolack, Sédhiou, Diakhao and Kaffrine. They remained closer to predicted levels in other surplus area markets like Diamagadio, Fatick, Mbirkilane and Ndrame Escale. In most of these markets, prices started to increase more sharply above predicted levels with the lifting of confinement in June.
This trend is illustrated in Figures 4a and 4b which depict the cases of markets in the Sédhiou and Kaolack districts. The case of the Kaolack market is interesting. Although located in a surplus producing zone, Kaolack is the largest city in the area and a major consumption center. The surge in supplies from the surrounding areas following the lifting of restrictions in June has pushed prices downward, more like deficit area markets and unlike markets in purely surplus areas such as Sédhiou. The introduction of restrictions nudged prices slightly under their predicted levels around March, in particular in the case of Sédhiou. They started to recover in April and May, as the shock that came with the confinement subsided and people started to find ways to evade the restrictions. Prices continued their upward trends in Sédhiou but fell slightly in Kaolack. The difference in behavior post deconfinement is most likely linked to the difference in the degree of interconnectedness with other markets. In both cases, though, prices were still clearly above the predicted level,
P-2
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
mar-20 apr-20 may-20 jun-20
Prop
ortio
n of
mar
kets
Retail Markets
Markets with prices Lower than predictions Higher than
predictions
67%
25%
8%
March 2020
Range of pricedeviation (%)
-5 to 5
5 to 15
>15
31%
23%
46%
June 2020
Range of pricedeviation (%)
-5 to 5
5 to 15
>15
Figure 1. Rapid increase in the share of markets with higher than predicted prices
Figure 2. Surging price spikes among rural markets
by 5 percent in Kaolack and 28 percent in Sédhiou. This pattern of price behavior is found across all surplus area markets with a generalized increasein prices over predicted levels with the lifting of movement restrictions in June. Prices exceeded predicted levels by 12 to 26 percent in other surplus
area markets such as Kaffrine, Kouthiaba, Mereto, Ndoffane, Passy and Porokhane. The much higher than predicted prices in June are a result of increasing demand from deficit area markets following deconfinement. They rose more in more connected markets such as Kouthiaba and
P-3
Figure 4a. Actual and predicted millet prices in Sedhiou (CFA francs per kg)
Figure 3. : Behavior of millet prices in surplus area markets
Figure 4b. Actual and predicted millet prices in Kaolack (CFA francs per kg)
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
CFA
Fran
cs
Actual Price Predicted Price
jan-
19
feb-
19
mar
-19
apr-1
9
may
-19
jun-
19
jul-1
9
aug-
19
sept
-19
oct-1
9
nov-
19
dec-1
9
jan-
20
feb-
20
mar
-20
apr-2
0
may
-20
jun-
20
100
150
200
250
300
CFA
Fran
cs
Actual Price Predicted Price
jan-
19
feb-
19
mar
-19
apr-1
9
may
-19
jun-
19
jul-1
9
aug-
19
sept
-19
oct-1
9
nov-
19
dec-1
9
jan-
20
feb-
20
mar
-20
apr-2
0
may
-20
jun-
20
least in less connected markets such as Ndrame Escale.
In general, one would have ex-pected that confinement would depress prices in surplus areas below expected levels and that they would recover once the con-finement had been lifted. While prices indeed fell below expected levels in some markets around March, this was observed in just two markets, Diamagadio and Mbirkilane, and only for a very brief period. In contrast, prices in surplus area markets rose sharply above predicted levels, leading to a nearly generalized increase in prices, post deconfinement. One possible explanation is that the demand that had built up in defi-cit areas over the confinement months, and which would have been spread over 2-3 months, suddenly descended onto supply-ing markets, creating a stronger than usual surge and thus push-ing prices considerably above predicted levels. It appears, therefore, that the restrictions in response to Covid-19, by creat-ing an artificial shortage of food staple supplies, have disrupted the arbitrage mechanism across markets, resulting in a more gen-eralized upward trend in prices, not just in deficit areas but also in surplus areas.
A sharp rise in millet prices in deficit areas during the confinement
Contrary to surplus area markets, millet prices are expected to rise above predicted levels during confinement. As shown in Figure 5, prices were indeed significantly higher than predictions in almost all markets located in deficit ar-eas, including Bakel, Ourossogui, Saint-Louis, Saint Maur (Ziguin-chor), Thiaroye (Dakar), and Tou-ba Toul. Generally, price spikes are steeper in markets that are weakly connected to primary mil-let collection areas like Thiaroye, in Dakar (Figure 6a). In many of these markets, millet prices have
Mereto
Diakhao
Sedhiou
Passy
Kaffrine
Ndoffane
KouthiabaDiamagadio
Porokhane
KaolackFatick
Ndrame Escale
Legend
High increaseModerate increaseNormalModerate decreaseNo data
Missing prices are for rural markets during the period of confinement when price collection was suspended.
100
150
200
250
300
jan-
19
feb-
19
mar
-19
apr-1
9
may
-19
jun-
19
jul-1
9
aug-
19
sept
-19
oct-1
9
nov-
19
dec-1
9
jan-
20
feb-
20
mar
-20
apr-2
0
may
-20
jun-
20
CFA
Fran
cs
Actual Price Predicted Price
100
150
200
250
300
CFA
Fran
cs
Predicted Price
jan-
19
feb-
19
mar
-19
apr-1
9
may
-19
jun-
19
jul-1
9
aug-
19
sept
-19
oct-1
9
nov-
19
dec-1
9
jan-
20
feb-
20
mar
-20
apr-2
0
may
-20
jun-
20
Actual Price
Figure 6a. Actual and predicted millet prices in Thiaroye (CFA francs per kg)
Figure 6b. Actual and predicted millet prices in Tambacounda (CFA francs per kg)
remained higher than predicted levels over the entire confine-ment period. Better networked markets such as Touba, Louga, Bakel, Kolda or Tambacounda (Figure 6b) have experienced moderate to negligible price in-creases, even during the confine-ment period. As in the case Ka-olack, the Tambacounda market exhibits a somewhat untypical behavior. Because it operates as an assembly market, the drop in demand during confinement has tended to depress prices, which in turn rose after the lifting of the restrictions, just as a market in a surplus area would behave.
Conclusions
Measures taken by governments to control the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, including travel restrictions and constraints to the movement of goods, dis-rupt local staple markets and thus impact on the cost of food consumed by the poorest and most vulnerable segments of the population. In the case of millet markets in Senegal, con-finement and other containment measures have pushed up millet prices in deficit areas far above their predicted levels. The same increase was observed in surplus area markets, and was sustained even in June following the de-confinement. One would have expected that the end of con-finement would normalize mar-ket conditions and bring prices back to their seasonal levels, as supplies start to move from sup-plying markets into deficit areas. The general upward trend in pric-es means that poor and vulnera-ble households have experienced erosion of purchasing power and pressure to adjust food staples demand and consumption. The government initiated a major food distribution program in ef-forts to mitigate the likely impact on these households, especially in deficit areas but also in favor of
Figure 5. Behavior of millet prices in deficit area markets
Mbafaye
Kedougou
Thies
Tambacounda
Louga
BakelTouba
Diourbel
St−Maur
Ourossogui
Mpal
Kolda
ThiaroyeTouba Toul
Legend
High increaseModerate increaseNormalModerate decreaseNo data
P-4
Recommended citation: Taondyandé Maurice, Goundan Anatole, Odjo Sunday, Yade Mbaye. 2020. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Staples Food Prices in Local Markets: The Case of Millet Markets in Senegal. Covid-19 Bulletin No. 3, August. Kigali. AKADEMIYA2063.
AKADEMIYA2063 is grateful to USAID for funding for this work through a Feed the Future grant with Policy LINK. Any opinions stated here are those of the author(s) and are not necessarily representative of or endorsed by AKADEMIYA2063.
a: AKADEMIYA2063 | Kicukiro/Niboye KK 360 St 8 | 4729 Kigali-Rwandap: +221 77 761 73 02 | p: +250 788 304 270 | e: hq-office@akademiya2063.org | w: akademiya2063.org
Table1. Actual millet price deviations from predictions ( %)
Source: Based on Senegal’s Market Information System data (2010-2020).
Area Millet price trend
Market Market type Mar-2020
Jun-2020
Scorecard variation (V)
Deficit Area
High Bakel Retail/Urban 19 24 increase Ourossogui Assembly /Urban 9 6 Saint Louis Assembly /Urban 3 22 Saint Maur Assembly /Urban -5 9 Thiaroye Assembly /Urban 2 17 Thiès Assembly /Urban 15 21 Touba Toul Collection/Rural 3 18
DeficitArea
Moderateincrease
Diourbel Retail/Urban 9 Tambacounda Assembly /Urban -3 17 Touba Assembly /Urban 9
DeficitArea
Normal
Kolda Assembly /Urban -5 -2 Mpal Assembly /Rural -5 3 Louga Assembly /Urban -6 -3
Deficit Area
Moderatedecrease
Kedougou Assembly /Urban -13
SurplusArea
High increase
Kouthiaba Collection/Rural 3 24Mbafaye Collection/Rural 36 16 Mereto Collection/Rural 12 26 Ndoffane Collection/Rural 4 16
Passy Collection/Rural 9 12 Porokhane Collection/Rural 15 Sedhiou Retail/Urban -22 28
SurplusArea
Moderateincrease
Diakhao Collection/Rural 1 8 Kaffrine Assembly/Urban 22 16
SurplusArea
Normal
Diamagadio Collection/Rural 2 -4 Fatick Retail/Urban 5 2
Kaolack Assembly/Urban -5 5 Mbirkilane Collection/Rural 9 2 Ndrame Escale Collection/Rural -4 3
V≥10%: High increase
5≤V<10: Moderate increase
- 5≤V<5: Normal
- 10≤V<-5: Moderate decrease
Legend :
net food buying house-holds in surplus market areas.
A key lesson for future shocks is to better plan and roll out confinements and other restrictions so as to minimize disruptions to market operations and ensure continuity of flows of food staples between surplus and deficit areas. This is not an easy condition to meet but with better targeting and early identification and isolation of affected areas, large scale disruptions can be avoided. Non-affected areas can continue to operate, and a slower spread of infections would make it easier to modulate responses and create corridors for safe circulation of food and people.