Mediation and Quality of Life Schiphol region

Post on 16-Jan-2016

44 views 0 download

description

Mediation and Quality of Life Schiphol region. 4 October 2012. 1. Content. Airports and quality of life Schiphol airport mediation Alders table QLAIR project Evaluation. 2. Airports and quality of life Quite a puzzle. 3. Green Environment. Increase Job opportunities. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

transcript

1

Mediation and Quality of LifeSchiphol region

4 October 2012

2

• Airports and quality of life • Schiphol airport mediation• Alders table• QLAIR project• Evaluation

Content

3

Airports and quality of life Quite a puzzle

4

Airports and Quality of Life Three elements

3. Investment impulse living environment

2. Individual (tailor made) Compensation

1.

Measures decreasing/avoiding Noise, Nuisance and Emissions

-

Tailor made Measures

Reduced Nuisance

Green Environment

Individual Compensation

Increase Job opportunities

Improved public Information

Satisfactory Living Environment

5

Airports and Quality of Life Three elements

The three elements form the basis for:• The Mediation process

(Alderstable) in the Schiphol region

• The ARC – project Quality of Life in Airport Regions

6

Schiphol airport mediation

CommissionNoise Hindrance

Schiphol

Commission Regional

Consultation Schiphol

Alders Table

Regional Board Schiphol

2003 2006 2013

New runwayPolderbaan

New national Schiphol policy

Optimalization

7

• Commission Noise Hindrance Schiphol (CGS) Complaints registration and response

• Commission Regional Consultation Schiphol (CROS) Institutional Current operations Regional stakeholders

• Alders Table Informal, but with large political impact Future balance between aviation and region National and regional discussion

• Regional Board Schiphol (ORS) Merging of CROS and Alders Table Meeting and exchange/Negotiation

Schiphol airport mediation

8

Alders TableNational/regional coordination

Alders Table

Ministry of Infrastructure and

Mobility

Residents

AF-KLMSchiphol

ATM (LVNL)

Municipalities

Regional authoritiesProvinces

9

Alders Table National/regional coordination

Agreement of all/most stakeholders on Schiphol’s future (short/medium/long term)•Development of the airport•Reduction of (noise) nuisance•Investments in surrounding area / quality of life

10

Alders Table Large political impact

Alders Table

Minister of I&M

Parliament

Implem

entationAdvise

Policy proposal

11

May 2007: Signing of Quality of Life Contract EUR 30 mln budget

Ministry of Transport Schiphol Airport Province Noord-Holland

Collective, spatial focused projects Individual cases

Alders Table Quality of life

Independent foundation

Alders Table Quality of Life Foundation

– Solving individual cases– Mediation for individual solutions:

Moving arrangements Insulation measures Fixing roof tiles

Alders Table Quality of Life Foundation

Helping with the development of plans for investments in deprived areas and villages

•Bottom up with residents (this is a requirement for financing by the foundation)

•Co-financing by local authorities

14

NL regional authorities seek European level playing field

QLAIR project

15

QLAIR project

16

QLAIR project

European level Playing field

Regional and localcapitalisation

Best practicesInnovation

17

QLAIR project

18

Evaluation  Evaluation items

1 Information& Communication

a Easy access

b Radar tracking

c Noise complaints procedure

d New inhabitants

e Stakeholder forum (governance)

2 Ground noise

a Applicable

b Policy

c Solutions

3 Mitigation& Investment

a Mitigation/isolation of houses

b Compensation

c Investment

4 Operational

a Predictability of flights

b Night flights

• Has the European level playing field been realised?

• Have the quality of life issues been tackled in other European airport regions?

19

EvaluationQLAIR partners and other relevant regions

Evaluation items LHR CDG FRA MAD BCN LGW VIE BRU DUB HEL PRG WAW1 Information& Communicationa Easy accessb Radar trackingc Noise complaints procedured New inhabitantse Stakeholder forum (governance)2 Ground noisea Applicabilityb Policyc Solutions3 Mitigation& Investmenta Mitigation/insulation of housesb Compensationc Investment4 Operationala Predictability of flightsb Night flights

20

EvaluationOther airport regions

Evaluation items ARN MAN ZRH MUC CPH1 Information& Communicationa Easy access + + +b Radar tracking + + + + +c Noise complaints procedure + + + +d New inhabitantse Stakeholder forum (governance) + + + +2 Ground noisea Applicabilityb Policyc Solutions3 Mitigation& Investmenta Mitigation/insulation of houses + + + + +b Compensation + + + +c Investment + +4 Operationala Predictability of flights + + + + +b Night flights + + + + +

21

Conclusions• Level playing field is realised especially with respect to the direct

competitor airport regions.• Regions with smaller sized airports have less QLAIR activities.• Other airport regions (outside QLAIR) show also increasing quality

of life policies.• Difficult to develop EU best practices or directives.

Recommendations• Close cooperation with larger airport regions (UK, GE).• Implementation action plan QLAIR.• Involvement of ACI, AEA by means of partner airports and airlines

to develop industry standards.

Evaluation