Post on 16-Mar-2020
transcript
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF LAMBTON SHORES
Meeting of Council to consider Planning — Community Services Issues
Meeting Number
30-2001 Date
of
Meeting: Tuesday, December
11, 2001 Time: 4:
00p.
m. — Policy Governance 6:
30 — 7:00p. m. 7:
00 — 10: 00p.m. PlaceofMeeting: ThedfordVillage ComplexAGENDA
Page(s) 1.
Call
to Order 2. Declaration of Pecuniary or Conflict
of Interest3. Delegations and
Time Allocations Drainage — Summary sheet and excerpts from
the Act 1 - 2 Reports
areall enclosedseparately 3.1
7:00 p.m. Broadview
DrainCourt ofRevision JeromeTrudell
willbe presentingthe appealsreceived
For Council's deliberation. Information
is in the package with the yellow cover
sheet3.27:25p.m. B & C
Drain — Pump upgrade Jerome Trudell will
be presenting the report forCouncil's consideration. Informationis in the package
withtheblue cover sheet 3.37:55 p.m. B & C
Drain — Channel repairs Ray Dobbinwill be presenting the report to Council'sconsideration. Informationisin the package with
the pink cover sheet3.4
8:30p.m. Zone Amendment Application - Stephen Halicki for property located
in Plan 510, Lots 26, 27 and Block 38 —
Gill Road — Grand Bend1. Minutes from
the Public Meeting — Nov.
133-42. Update
Report - Dave
Posliff5
3. Site
Drawing
from
Mr. Halicki 6
4. Indication of the proposed use of land ownedby Mr.
Halicki 75. Draft
By- law8-10
44. Reports from Staff 4.1 CL
ReportNo.
122-2001
Re: Decisions
ofthe
Committeeof
Adjustment
at
the meeting held the 26' dayof November 11-12 4.2 CL Report No.
123-2001 Re: RiverbendWharf request to build model home on the "Manore" property —
Sauble Road, Grand Bend 13-164.
3C.A.O. Report No. 111-2001 Re: Site Plan Agreement — Purdy
Fisheries 83 River Road, Grand
Bend17-
185. BY-LAWS 5.1By-law 98-2001Aby- lawto
provide for drainage works — Broadview Avenue Drain — 31
reading ( if assessmentappeals are resolved) 5.2 By-law99-2001 A by-law to
provide for drainage works — B & G Concession Drain Pump
Repair — 1S` and 2"dreading ( if report accepted) 5.3 By- law 100-2001
A by-law to provide for drainage works —
B & C ConcessionDrain Improvements - 1s` and 21 reading ( if reportaccepted) 5.4 By-law
101-2001
A
by-
lawto
amend Zoning
by-law
5040-1986
re: Halicki 6. NEW
BUSINESS7. ADJOURN Also in the package: Revised
Council meeting schedule for
2002 — Green paper November 2001 Staff Newsletter
Summary Sheet — Drainage meetings
Broadview Court of Revision
To deal with assessment issues only. Technical merit was to be done at the
Consideration
The role of the Court of Revision is to hear the appeals, and make decisions as
to the validity of the appeal. If an appeal is determined to be valid, the
assessment charge to that individual landowner can be reduced by an amount to
be determined by the Court. However, the cost of the aroiect will remain the
same, and so the costs can merely be re -allocated: either to the other owners, or
to the Municipality.
In order to provide a paper trail, there needs to be a resolution for every changeapproved.
If the Court decides to reduce one person's assessment, and reassign the costs
to the other ratepayers, it is necessary to adjourn the Court of Revision, notifyowners of the increase in their costs, and hold another sitting of the Court of
Revision to give an opportunity to the ratepayers to appeal their new
assessment.
B & C Pump — Jerome
Usually, after discussing the merits of the project, the assessed persons are given an
opportunity to add or delete their name from the petition. In this case, the repairs to
the pump have been completed as they were originally considered maintenance.
After the full extent of the modifications the Municipality, under Section 78 of the
Drainage Act, appointed the Engineer to prepare the report f, thereby allowing the
agricultural lands to be eligible for a 1/3 grant. (Details in theEngineer' sreport — underOn -Site Meeting) Therefore, the people are not provided an opportunity
to remove their names from the
petition. B & CDrain Improvements — Ray
Dobbin This work was initiated under a petition, submitted by the majority of
persons requiring drainage. Therefore, after discussing the merits of the project, asper Section 42 of the Drainage Act, the Council shall give an opportunity to
any person who has signed the petition to add or delete their name from thepetition. See Drainage Act excerpt attached for Liabilityof original
petitioners. When looking at the costs to be charged to the assessed persons, use
the Composite
Schedule" An explanationof "Benefit", "Outlet" and "BlockAssessments" is found on Page
7 of Mr. Dobbin's
Report. 0
22Chap.
D.
17DRAT11011- (5) A
by-lawpassed
by the council
of any qbelocal municipality in connection with the con - vas struction ofa drainage works under
this Act shall not be quashed by reason
only that any notices required under this section werenot sent within the specified time limits.
R.S.O. 1980, c. 126, s. 41. Coruidet'
42. The council of the
initiating munici- cportof pality at the meeting
mentioned in section 41 shall consider the report, and, where the drainage works is requested
on petition, shall give an opportunity toany person who has signed the petition to
withdraw from it by putting a withdrawal inwriting, signingit and filingit with the
clerk, and shall also give those present owning landswithin the area requiring drainage who have
not signed the petition an opportunity to
do so, and should l any of the
lands or roads owned by the municipality within the
area requiring drain- age as described
in the petition be assessed, the council mayby resolution authorize the head of themunicipality to sign the petition for the municipality, and such signature counts as thatof one person in favour of the petition. R.S.
O. 1980, c. 126, s. 42. 4.20143. If,
after striking out the names of the tioners persons
withdrawing, the names remaining ffCtewy44. If, at the end of such council meeting, f petitr0o the petition contains a sufficient number of
names to comply with section4, the council
may proceedto adopt the report, and,
sub- ject to section 59, no
person having signed the petition shall, afterthe adoption of the report, be permittedto withdraw. R.S.O. 1980, c. 126, s. 44. aoption,of 45.--(1) A reportmay be adopted byby- law in the
form prescribed by the regulations and, whensuch by-law is given two readings by
council, the report shall be deemedtobe 23hV&TE- Aer Sec./
art. 45 (1) DPAD adopted and the by-lawshall be known as a provisional by-law. 11 or (2) Where a report is
not adopted by rc to Tribunal council, any
petitioner may appeal to the Tri- burial or, where lands used for agricultural purposes are included
in the area to be drained, theMinister
may refer the matter to
theTribunal. R.S.O. 1980, c. 126, s. 45. Notice of 46.—(1) The council ofthe initiating court ofrevision to municipality shall, withinfive days after the be sent to adoption of
the
report, send a copy of
the IOCaI tn""'c' isional b law, exclusive of the
enipalities .
ria P
rovY- gto
owners neer' s report, and a notice ofthe time and place of the first sittingof the court of revi- sion byprepaid mail to every other local municipality in
which any land or road is assessed for
the drainage worksorfor which allowance or compensation has
been pro- vided forinthe report.
Idem (2) The
council of
the
initiatingmunicipal- ity and of every localmunicipality to whom a copy of the
provisional by- law is sent under subsection ( l) shall,
within thirtydays after the adoption ofthereport, send a copy of the provisional by-law,
exclusive of the engi- neer's report, and a notice
of the time and place of the sitting
of the court of revision by prepaid mail
to each person or body entitled to noticeunder section 41 and the noticeshall inform each owner that
the owner may appeal the owner's assessmentto the court of revision by a notice given
to the clerk of theinitiating municipality not laterthan ten days prior to thefirst sitting of the court of revi- sion. Sittingsof (3) Thefirst sitting of the courtofrevision court shall be held on a day not
earlier than twenty nor later than thirty days from thedate of completing the mailing of the copiesof the provisional by-law under subsection ( 2). R.S.O. 1980, c. 126, s. 46. on the petition, including the names, if any, Appeal
from added as provided by section 42 do not com-
reponto referee ply with section 4, the original petitioners on their respective assessments in the report
are
chargeable proportionatelywith
and liable
to the
municipality
for the expenses incurred by the municipality in connection
with the peti- tion and report and the sum withwhich each of such petitioners is chargeable shall be
entered upon the collector' s roll for the
municipality againstthe lands of theperson2. liable, and shall be collected in
the
samemanner as real property taxes. R.S.O.
1980, c. 126, s. 43. ffCtewy44. If, atthe end of such council meeting, f petitr0o the
petition contains a sufficient number of names to
comply with section 4, the council may proceedto adopt the report, and, sub- ject
to section 59, no person having signed
the petition shall, after the adoption of the report,
be permitted to withdraw. R.S.O. 1980, c. 126, s. 44. aoption,of
45.--( 1) A report may
be adopted by by- law in the form prescribed by theregulations
and, when such by-law is giventwo
readings by council, the report shall be deemed
to be 23 hV&TE- Aer Sec./art. 45 (1) DPAD adopted and the by-law
shall be known asa provisional by- law. 11or (2) Where a report
is not adopted by rc to Tribunal council, any
petitioner may appeal to the Tri- burial or, where lands used for agricultural purposes are
included in the area to be drained,
the Minister may refer the matter to theTribunal. R.S.O. 1980, c. 126, s. 45. Noticeof 46.—(1) The council ofthe initiating court of revision to municipality shall, withinfive days after the be sent toadoption of the report, send a copyof the IOCaI tn""'c' isional b law,
exclusive of the en i palities . ria P rovY- gto owners neer' s report, anda notice of the time and place of
the first sitting of the court ofrevi- sion by prepaid mail to every otherlocal municipality in which any landor road is assessed for the drainage works or forwhich allowance or compensation has been pro- vided for
in the report. Idem (2) The council of the initiatingmunicipal- ity and of every local
municipality to whom a copy of the provisional by-law issent under subsection ( l) shall, within thirty
days after the adoption of the report, senda copy of the provisional by- law, exclusiveof the engi- neer' s report, and anotice of the time and place of the
sitting of the court of revision by prepaidmail to each person or
body entitled to notice under section 41 and the notice shallinform each owner that the owner may appealthe owner' s assessment to the court of revisionby a notice given to the clerk of the
initiatingmunicipality not later
than ten days prior to
the first sitting of the court of revi- sion. Sittingsof ( 3) The
first sitting of the court of revision court shall beheld on
a day not earlier than twenty nor later thanthirty days from the date of completingthe mailing of the copies of the provisionalby- law under subsection ( 2). R. S. O. 1980, c. 126, s. 46. APPEALS Appeal from 47._( 1)
Any owner of land or public util- repon toreferee ity
affected by a drainage works, if dissatis- fied withthe report of the engineer on the -- grounds that it does notcomply with the requirements of this Act, or that the engi- neer has reported that thedrainage works cannot be constructed under section 4, may appeal to the
referee and in every case a written notice of appealshall be served upon the council of theinitiating municipality 2.
EXCERPTS FROM THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY
OF LAMBTON SHORES COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Meeting Number: 27-2001
Date of Meeting: Tuesday, November 13, 2001
3.2 Zone Amendment — Stephen Halicki for property located in Plan 510, Lots 26,27 and Block 38 — Gill Road, Grand Bend
01-1113-05 Moved by: Councillor Andraza
Seconded by: Councillor De Vet
That the regular Council meeting adjourn at 7:45.p.m. for a public meetingunder the Planning Act to hear an application submitted by StephenHalicki for property located Plan 510, Lots 26 and 27, former Village of
Grand Bend. Carried
Mr. And Mrs. Halicki were the only members of the public present. Dave Posliff, Senior Planner, County of Lambton explained that the applicationbefore Council was to amend the zoning on 2 lots and a block in Green Forest
Estates to allow for a town home development. The Village of Grand Bend
approved a similar zoning on 2 adjacent lots in 2000, and the current plan is to
use both parcels of land to construct 35 dwelling units. Council reviewed Mr.
PoslifFsplanning report, which outlined the current Official Plan designations and zone
designation anda synopsis of the proposal. Also
included in the report was a concern regarding the proposed layout of the concept
plan, which leaves lot 25 " sandwiched" between the rear yard of townhouses
and2 lots on the other side. In addition, the concept plan does not indicate
the proposed building setbacks or the parking provisions. This information
will be necessary to determineif the property meets the compatibility policiesin the Official Plan. A concern was also raised that this area had originally
been intended for single family dwellings, and that there didn'tseem to be
an overall development scheme for the subdivision, indicating total proposed densityand the impact of this increased density on the area. Mr. Posliff would prefer
to see more information on the long term goals for balance of the subdivision
before proceeding. Mr.
Halicki had sent a fax on the weekend outlining his thoughts on where the property
development was heading and a copy was provided to Mr. Posliff. Mr Halicki
noted that these were the only contiguous lots that he owns in this block and
that the other owners were approached and were not interested in participating
in this development. 3.
Councillor Weber asked if the notice had been circulated to all owners, and it was
confirmed that it had.
Mayor Ivey noted that Council is being asked to make changes to an existingplan of subdivision to allow higher density development. Many of the lots have
been sold, however, the roads are not installed, nor are services available to the
lots. The subdivision lots were sold prior to the installation of these services, and
there isn't a developer the Municipality can compel to do the installation.
Mr. Halicki noted that many of the lots were acquired through a power of sale
when the developer went bankrupt. In order to make it economically feasible to
bring the services to the property, it is necessary to increase the density. The
sewage capacity being planned is approximately 3 times what is necessary for
this development. Mr. Halicki owns other, contiguous lots within the plan, and
may look at the possibility of a seniors home as another anchor for the
development.
Councillor Andraza questioned the storm water designs for the area and it was
noted that the Ausable Bayfield Conservation Authority had provided comments
on the flood proofing and the "two -zone" requirements for buildings in this area.
Director of Community Services Paul Turnbull noted that it was common in a
development such as this for a tree preservation plan and asked if one was
proposed for the subdivision. Mr. Posliff noted that this could be incorporated into
the site plan, and asked for a copy of the existing subdivision agreement.
The letter received from Larry and Judy Mason outlining several issues was read
and entered into the file, and provided to Dave Posliff for review.
Mayor Ivey noted that some of the issues being discussed dealt with usageversus zoning. The site plan would address many of the concerns regarding set
backs, tree preservation and the width of the internal roads. Mr. Posliff has
asked for more information on the concept plan to ensure compatibility with the
surrounding lands, and will compile a list of the items he would like shown on a
plan and forward same to Mr. Halicki. Council will defer a decision until that
information is available and a tentative date of December 11 was set for the next
meeting.
01-1113-06 Moved by: Councillor Weber
Seconded by: Councillor Boon
That the public meeting on the zone amendment application submitted bySteve Halicki close at 8:15 p.m and the regular Council meetingreconvene. Carried
1/0
IEC -05-2001 16=06 519 845 3817 PLANNINGAND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
789
Broadway StBox3000LILA Wyoming, Orda&
NON 1TOPhone: 518445-
0801 Fax: 519-845-3817E -Mail:
planning®co nty-
lambton.on.ca COUNTY OF LAWTON
December 5, 2001 Mayor
Ivey and Members
of Council
Municipality of
Lambton Shores19 Ann
Street Forest, Ontario NON 110 Attention:
Carol McKenzie, Clerk DearMayor Ivey and Council Members: Re:
Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment, Gill Road, Grand Bend Council will recall that at the
public meeting on this proposal onNovember 13, the applicant was asked
to forward further information for
our consideration, includinga somewhat more detailed site plan. Ihave since receivedadditional information. The site plan that has been provided indicates thatthe buildings can besituated on the propertyin compliance with the zoning requirements ofthe 83.15 zone_ The applicant
hasalso confirmed this, and added that a professionally completed site planwillbe provided forsite plan approval. Aphotograph of the general concept of the townhouses has also
been provided, as hasa general idea of future plans for the area. These can be discussed
in greater detail at
our meeting with the applicant on December11. Ihaveincludedanamending zoning by-
law for Council's consideration which includesa limit of 35 townhouse unitsand also notes that thereare floodproofing requirements under the Desjardine Drain Two -Zone
study undertaken last year. I look forward
to meeting
with you
on the
11 `h. Yours truly, Tal Tl Dave Posliff
Senior PlannerntN.T , r
81' 8ZZ
s ,08'09 E 3 3 N 00
mm
3 Cl) m Mc6 30 v
ao°. o
m ct
a %- o °
ow
Ob0
ma0OoE
3m omCL -0 0 mcm
0
IO3 a
Em s m : omoti
i-i-
pE3:a
pea3
O c.E
O
owo.cwYaEE
N po E OVc_.
ic
cEc0
O
OOZ
m c1 V m v
E r3>
0P
JJ
V
NIi" $
I °' 30VIdm10 e
SEWm
OL .
iilW
a
0330
1N30S383
3HO:
130
m
N
N 9L . 09
N .
08 .
08 Ing
a05 o
i aN
I sru
zW
V W 4g
O
JJI
V WaQLL
Wa,
In
CORPORATION OF THE
MUNICIPALITY OF LAMBTON SHORES
ZONING BY-LAW 101 OF 2001
Being a By-law to amend By-law 5040 of 1986.
WHEREAS the Council of the former Corporation of the Village of Grand Bend passed a
comprehensive Zoning By-law 5040 of 1986 on the 21 st day of July, 1986;
and WHEREASBy-law 5040 of 1986 is still in effect inthe amalgamated Municipality;
and WHEREAS Council deemsit desirable to amend the saidBy-law;
and WHEREAS a public meeting was held on November 13, 2001 under Section34(12)
of the Planning Act, R.S.O.,
1990; NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of
Lambton Shores enacts as
follows: 1. Schedule "A" attached is hereby declared to form part of thisBy-
law. 2. Schedule " A" toBy-law 5040 of 1986 is hereby amended by changing the
zone symbol that applies to the lands shown on Schedule " A" to thisBy-law from "VR.1"
toR3.
15". 3. 4Section 14.16.2of By-law 5040 of1986 is hereby amended
by deleting subsection f)" and replacingit
with the following: f) Maximum Density: 35 Dwelling
Units on the Lands Described as Part
of Lot 1,
Aux Sables Concession, 22112239 ST), Pts. 1, 2
and 3, and Lots 26 and 27
and Block 38in
Registered Plan510, inclusive." Section 14.16.2 of By-law 5040 of 1986 is hereby further
amended by adding
the followingnew subsection: i) Floodproofing Requirements:
S• In accordance
withthe approved
Desjardine Drain Two -
Zone Study"
K
5. ThisBy-law shall come into force and effect pursuant to Section34(21) or
Section34(30) of the Planning Act, R.S.O.
1990. READA FIRST AND SECOND TIME
THIS
DAY OF ,
2001. READATHIRD TIME AND
FINALLY
PASSED THIS
DAY
OF ,
2001.
Mayor Clerk 9•
3
MUNICIPALITY OF LAMBTON SHORES
ZONING BY-LAW OF 2001
Explanatory Note
The purpose of this zoning by-law amendment is to change the zoning on lands
described as Lots 26 and 27 and Block 38, Registered Plan 510, in the former Village of
Grand Bend from "Village Residential (Low Density) (VR.1)" zone to the "Multiple -FamilyResidential 15 (R3.15)" zone. Adjacent lands were the subject of a 2000 rezoning to
permit the construciton of 20 townhouse units. This amendment would permit the
construction of an additional 15 townhouse units on the subject lands. The amendment
also notes the requirements of the recently completed Desjardine Drain Two -Zone Study.
The Key Map shows more particularly the subject lands.
be
MUNICIPALITY OF LAMBTON SHORES
CL Report No. 122-2001 Date: Tuesday, December 4, 2001
From: Carol McKenzie, Clerk
Re: Committee of Adjustment Decisions
Recommendation:
Forinformation only Report:
The Committee of Adjustment heard the following applications on Monday, November 26, 2001:
1. Evan & Louise Smithrim — Minor Variance Application
This application proposed relief from Sections 15.5 b) goods offered for sale are
to be manufactured on site, c) no outside storage of materials, containers, or
finished products and e) which limits the floor area of a home occupation to 25%
of the gross floor area of the dwelling.
Mr. & Mrs. Smithrim were present to present their application. Mr. Smithrim
informed the Committee that he does home repairs during the day and
sometimes meets with clients at his home in the evenings to discuss estimates, and he would like an office and some product samples to show the clients.
A discussion was held by the Committee members on the concern that this
variance would set a precedent for future "home occupations" along the Highway21 corridor.
The Committee's decision was to grant a variance for Sections 15.5 b) and c) and not allow the variance for e). The Smithrims will need to conform to the
requirement to limit the home occupation to 25% of the floor area. The
Committee also requested that the applicant enter into a site plan agreement with
the Municipality to monitor the home occupation.
2. Philip Walden for Margaret and Frank Van DePeer — Minor Variance
This application proposed relief from Section 7.1.2 c) ii) which requires a
minimum side yard setback of 2 metres where the dwelling includes an attached
carport or garage.
The Committee granted the variance.
40
3. Philip Walden for Dick Pollock — Consent Application
Mr. Walden presented the application for consent to sever an irregularly shapedparcel from a farm parcel and add it to the rear of an abutting residential propertyowned by Mr. Turnbull
The Committee granted the consent. The severed lands are to be deeded in thesame name and interest to which it is being added.
Should you have any questions, please contact Jackie Mason at 786-2335.
Respectfullysubmittedcp-)d Carol
McKenzie Clerk2.
MUNICIPALITY OF LAMBTON SHORES
CL Report No. 123-2001 Date: Thursday, December 6, 2001
From: Carol McKenzie, Clerk
Re: Riverbend Wharf — Ray Losee
Recommendation:
That the draft letter of understanding between the Municipality of LambtonShores and Riverbend Wharf Inc., as outlined in CL Report No. 123-2001 is
accepted as presented and the Mayor and Clerk are authorized to sign the
agreement on behalf of the Municipality
Report:
Mr. Ray Losee is the owner of the property referred to as the former Manore
Property on Sauble River Road. In July, the Council held a public meeting on the
proposed zone amendment from Multi -residential 14 to Single Family Residentialand the application was approved on July 16, 2001.
Mr. Losee has recently approached the Municipality and asked for permission toerect a model home on the property, on the most northerly "lot", and connect to the
existing sewer, water and hydro connections.
As a general rule, a person is entitled to receive a permit to build on a piece of
property, conditional upon meeting all the zoning and setback requirements. In this
case, Mr. Losee has not subdivided the lots, and therefore has one lot of record andwould be entitled to one permit.
Dave Posliff has prepared a "mini" agreement which states that the Municipalityagrees that one model home may be constructed on the property, conditional uponthe owner acknowledging that he is fully responsible for siting the building properlyto ensure that it does not hamper his future developments, and that he is notabsolved of any future responsibility for servicing, upgrades etc when the balanceof the project commences.
Respectfully submitted,
Carol McKenzieClerk
13
112/05/200114: 54519-536- 9861 592
Adel" Sired. Woodstock,
OrtOM H48460Phom ( 519)538.9981
FaDc (519) 538- 6681 FaX PAGE
01RIVERBENDWHARF INC.
Toe CardMdQwweFfom FtWLowe Coe why ofUvnbton Sham "
ta Deomrdw 5, 2001 Frac 519-785.2135p"ONLRotAgenda
fbf
Council Tues. Dec 11 / 01 CC.- E3 CeE3
urgnt O Ron
Ravlewv 0
PkCos-
w+eer! X P1"m ROply O P1era
MsyaN
For the
purposeof obtaining
a BulMV Permit for one single family
dwelling onthe format Msnom sMe Sauble Road, Grand
Berl Iwould think the by-law
which has been passed hers been impirarmtmd and I
will beable to meet the aster* by-law In re9srds to est backs, side yards and
lot oaveragft / 1OdRd isacopyof the site plan with theone house OAodel Norse) shown foryour review. The hour vA be hurtheat to the northof thekit and hooked up10eedstingsewer, water and hydro %dMio& Any aqudment with these services vA bedone at the time the rest of the developmmtis SOMbed. If you have any questions please onto meat the office (519) 536-®961 ormy call (1519) 63 2548. Sirmerely Ray LoWe
1/05/2001 14:54
1/05/ 200113:
39519-536-
98615196529259
iF! tMI.iK tr ulrvLGn, l u
PAGE 02 F e
AGREEMENT
REGARDING
THE CONSTRUCTIONOFA "MODEL HOME" BETWEEN:
The Corporation of the Municipality of Lambton Shores
The Municipality)
AND
Riverbend Wharf Inc.
The Owner)
The Municipality hereby agrees that one (1) single detached dwelling maybe constructed on the Owner's lands, described as Part of Block E, Plan
30, on Sauble Road in Grand Bend, subject to meeting all currentlyapplicable regulations.
2. The Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to the following:
a) that the Owner bears the full responsibility for siting the subjectdwelling in a location that will not interfere with its own plans for thefuture subdivision of the property.
b) that any building permit granted by the Municipality for the subjectdwelling does not relieve the Owner of any future requirements ofthe Municipality regarding the subdivision of the property, includingrequirements for improvements to the municipal road and services, and the entering into of further development or subdivision
agreements for the subject lands.
Dated this _ day of Owner
J.
C. Ivey, Mayor Carol
McKenzie, Clerk 2001.
A &
THE MUNICIPALITY OF LAMBTON SHORES
C.A.O. Report No. 111-2001 Thursday, December 6th 2001
To: Mayor Cam Ivey and Members of Council
From: John Byrne Chief Administrative Officer
Re: Site Plan Agreement — Purdy Fisheries Limited 83 River Rd. Grand Bend
Recommendation:
That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute a Site Plan Agreementwith Purdy Fisheries Limited for the development of property located at 83
River Rd. Grand Bend as outlined in C.A.O. Report No. 111-2001
Report:
Purdy Fisheries Limited is a commercial fishing company, which operates out of Grand
Bend Harbour. The building they operated from previously was demolished early in
2001 to allow for the construction of a new building to operate their business.
The Site Plan Control By-law of Grand Bend and now Lambton Shores makes
provision for commercial type buildings like this to submit a Site Plan if significantmodifications are being made. The unusual aspect of this particular property is that it
has frontage on River Rd. and on Grand Bend harbour. The other interesting aspect is
that half the property, that half fronting on the harbour is on leased land with the
Federal Government.
As noted this is a commercial fishing operation designed to store equipment and
supplies related to that operation. The site plan will consist of requirements with
respect to surface drainage, signage, driveways, parking and lighting. Due to the
commercial nature of the zoning there are no requirements with respect to landscapingthat are needed.
The Site Plan agreement therefore simply lays out the basis requirements for the
development of the property.
Respectfully submitted,
ative Officer
7.
I1203/ 0112: 56 FAX 151978621?" r SHEETPILING PART5 I 20.
614mD.,g
IJ"y
12.
186NUN
OF LAMBTON
SHORESNORTHVILLE (0002
RIVER 054
10.607m PART
6 20.13m LEASEDDOCK 0. 6m
PROPOSEDPL
9.8mBUILDING
REPLACE
E) 3. isiyll/ m7i:Ce? 8AsIN15. 898Mv 16.460mG'
ArzN
e?aruV t2. 192m — 1 RI VER
ROAD
S)TE
PLAN PART
6SCALE 1:
200 MIG ENGINEERING LTD. xv.q £
7.:£1 T00zi£0/ ZT