Net-Zero Energy Homes: The Basics of What You Need to Kno€¦ · Definitions •NZE: A building...

Post on 09-Apr-2020

2 views 0 download

transcript

Net-Zero Energy Homes:The Basics of

What You Need to KnowBuilding Science Corporation

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation1

Building Science CorporationKohta Ueno, Senior Associate

The 2010 HVACR & Plumbing Instructor Workshop:Advancing Green Mechanical Concepts

March 24-26, 2010

Background

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

Background

Definitions

• NZE: A building that produces as much energy in a typical year as it consumes.

– Consumes grid power when it needs it

– Feed power to grid when it has extra

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

– Feed power to grid when it has extra

• ALL energy considered

– Electric is not special.

• NOT Zero Carbon, or Zero GHG

• NOT off-grid

– Much more difficult

Why Buildings?

• Building Sector is largest energy consumer and GHG emitter

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

NZE Design Targets

• Produce as much as we consume

• Production is usually MUCH more expensive than reducing waste (efficiency/conservation)

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

(efficiency/conservation)

– Hence the energy demanded by building should always be reduced, reduced, reduced before adding production

– Check cost of reducing demand vs cost if supplying energy

Capital Investment vs. Operating Cost

1,500

2,000

2,500T

otal

Ann

ual C

osts

($/

year

)

mortgage

utility bills

cash flow

1

2

3

4

1,500

2,000

2,500T

otal

Ann

ual C

osts

($/

year

)

mortgage

utility bills

cash flow

1

2

3

4

1,500

2,000

2,500T

otal

Ann

ual C

osts

($/

year

)

mortgage

utility bills

cash flow

1

2

3

4

Minimum

Cost Point

“Least Cost”

Curve

Neutral Cost Point

All

En

erg

y R

ela

ted

Co

sts,

$

Lower cost

Higher Energy costs

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

0

500

1,000

0% 100%Energy Savings (%)

Tot

al A

nnua

l Cos

ts (

$/ye

ar)

2

0

500

1,000

0% 100%Energy Savings (%)

Tot

al A

nnua

l Cos

ts (

$/ye

ar)

2

0

500

1,000

0% 100%Energy Savings (%)

Tot

al A

nnua

l Cos

ts (

$/ye

ar)

2

Incremental, Energy

Related Mortgage

Costs

Source Energy Reduction

All

En

erg

y R

ela

ted

Co

sts,

$

Underlying Source: Dr Ren Anderson, NREL

Lower cost

conservation

Takeaway Lessons

• Conservation measures first! Good design/orientation, good enclosure (shell), good mechanicals

• Then start adding renewable energy

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

• Then start adding renewable energy

• Insulation has diminishing returns

• Renewables can be more cost-effective than insulation after a point!

• Net zero energy: good & noble target, but out beyond “neutral cost”

Renewables

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

Renewables

Energy Supply

• Renewable energy (RE) or cleaner energy (CE)

• Net Zero currently demands site

production

– This eliminates some good economical RE

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

– This eliminates some good economical RE

• Common choices

– Photovoltaic: Electricity

– Solar thermal Warm / Hotwater

– Combined heat and power

– Wind electricity

• PVphotovoltaic

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

Energy Supply (RE)

• PV

– Straightforward installation, easy to predict output

– Expensive but electricity is very useful and

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

– Expensive but electricity is very useful and excess can easily be sent to the grid (grid=battery)

– Rated by peak output under standard solar conditions (“peak Watt” or W

p)

– Costs now $8/Wp

(before subsidy) installed

• Solar Thermal“hot water”

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

Solar thermal• Intermittent source of hot water

• Well developed

• Requires big storage tanks in most application

© 2009

Building Science

CorporationBuildingScience.com

application

• Freezing, over heating, glycol thickening failures, and low temperature efficiency are issues

• Not the most economically-viable choice ($6-10 K): but if going to net zero…

© 2009

Building Science

CorporationBuildingScience.com

Combined heat and power

•Aka “CHP”

•Efficient use of fuel to produce heat & electricity

within the building complex (e.g. hospital) or home

•Remember: grid ~30% efficient; waste heat =

cooling towers, river water

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

cooling towers, river water

•Much lower GHG emissions

•Supplies on demand

•Ratio of electricity to

heat is fixed

•Effectiveness varies on case-by-case basis

Mechanical

Systems

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

Systems

Mechanical Systems

Energy consuming functions

• Heating

• Cooling

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

• Cooling

• Domestic Hot Water

• Ventilation & Filtration

Fundamental problem: small loads!

Furnaces• Condensing gas

furnaces: 90%+ AFUE—mature technology

• Sealed

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation18

• Sealed combustion

• ECM motors (“variable speed”) reduces fan electrical energy

Ground-source heat pumps• Uses constant ground

temperature to provide heating & cooling

• Fluid pumped through underground tubes; heat extracted or rejected

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation19

underground tubes; heat extracted or rejected

• One of the highest efficiency space conditioning systems (measured ~3.5 COP)

• But….

Ground-source heat pumps• Installed cost of system very high (drilling

ground loops)

• Nameplate efficiency < actual efficiency (previous example: 5 COP rated number)

• Pumping energy

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation20

• Pumping energy

• Systems with problems—difficult to diagnose, expensive to fix

• Can still suffer from normal ductwork-based system problems

• For small loads, is it worthwhile?

• 80% & 90%+ options

• Condensing boilers (90%+)—needs

Heating: Hydronic Systems

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

(90%+)—needs some thinking/design

• Outdoor reset controls for 90%+

• Can’t add cooling

Radiators/Radiant Floors

Radiant floor heat

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation22

Baseboard radiators

Radiant floor heat

Mini Splits

Mini-split short ducted system

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation23

Mini-split non-ducted head

Mini-split outdoor unit

•Both heating & cooling

•Multi-splits (single outdoor unit)

•Systems with SEER26 and HSPF=11 available

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

MiniMiniMiniMiniMiniMiniMiniMini--------Splits Heating/Cooling in Cold ClimateSplits Heating/Cooling in Cold ClimateSplits Heating/Cooling in Cold ClimateSplits Heating/Cooling in Cold ClimateSplits Heating/Cooling in Cold ClimateSplits Heating/Cooling in Cold ClimateSplits Heating/Cooling in Cold ClimateSplits Heating/Cooling in Cold Climate

••1818 sf house, solar1818 sf house, solar--oriented, superinsulated (12“ spray foam oriented, superinsulated (12“ spray foam walls, Rwalls, R--80 roof), triple glazed windows, very airtight80 roof), triple glazed windows, very airtight

••Central Massachusetts locationCentral Massachusetts location

••Net zero performanceNet zero performance

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

••Provides for both heating & cooling; 11,000 BTU heating loadProvides for both heating & cooling; 11,000 BTU heating load

••Installed costs in the 1,818 square foot “Farmhouse” was $6,850Installed costs in the 1,818 square foot “Farmhouse” was $6,850

••Two 9,000 BTU heads upstairs, One 12,000 BTU head downstairsTwo 9,000 BTU heads upstairs, One 12,000 BTU head downstairs

••Electric heater back up, no heat production below zero degrees Electric heater back up, no heat production below zero degrees outsideoutside

Ventilation

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

Ventilation

Need for Ventilation

• Greater airtightness for energy reasons, in net zero houses

• Also improves sound, odor, pest control

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

• Also improves sound, odor, pest control

• But people still stink! (+ activities)

• Controlled mechanical ventilation

– Point source control (exhaust fans)

– General dilution ventilation

Air Change Driving Forces

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

Wind Effect Stack Effect Combustion and Ventilation

Indoor Air Quality

• Pollutant production

• Pollutant removal

• Dynamic Balance= pollutant level

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

• Dynamic Balance= pollutant level

– Not a IAQ problem if it is not in the air

• Solutions

– Reduce pollutant production

– Increase pollutant removal

Ventilation

• Given sensible source control, constant ventilation can dilute pollutants to a low level

– Ventilation rates are mostly about odor and humidity, not oxygen

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

humidity, not oxygen

– 7.5 cfm/person + 0.01 cfm / sq ft

– Commercial and highrise 15 cfm/person (!)

• Mixing is necessary or separate supply to each room to achieve best IAQ

Types of Controlled Ventilation Systems

• Exhaust Ventilation

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

• Exhaust Ventilation• Supply Ventilation• Balanced Ventilation

Exhaust Only: Depressurize

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

• Lowest cost installed system (typical), but problems associated:

• Carbon monoxide alarms

• Lack of filtration

Exhaust pros and cons

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

• Lack of filtration• Dust marking on light carpets

• Dirt/grit particles settling on horizontal surfaces

• Lack of distribution• Moisture accumulation and odor buildup in rooms

remote from exhaust fan

• Objections to fan noise

Supply Only: Pressurized

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

Not common, although most commercial buildings have

more supply than exhaust

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation35

Plus “fan cycling” controller (runs air handler periodically + motorized damper to prevent overventilation)

Central fan-integrated ventilation

• “Smart” controller (accounts for previous runtime)

• Set minimum runtime (e.g., 20 min/hour)

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

• Set minimum runtime (e.g., 20 min/hour)

• Provides distribution of ventilation air throughout house

Balanced Supply and Exhaust

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

Common for commercial solutions

Residential often combine with HRV/ERV

Balanced Ventilation (with Heat Recovery)

• HRV/ERV

• Point exhaust

• Fully ducted(need not be)

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

(need not be)

Heat Recovery Ventilation

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation3911/19/2008

Efficient Equipment

• HRV/ERV always

– choose better than 1 CFM/Watt (current high end ~2 CFM/Watt)

– Choose > 60% efficient

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

– Choose > 60% efficient

– Right size ventilation!—overventilation can defeat the benefits of adding heat recovery!

Humidity

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

Humidity

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation4211/19/2008

Recommended Range of Relative Humidity• 25 percent during winter• 60 percent during summer

Supplemental Humidity Control• Good energy efficient design reduces

sensible cooling loads—insulation, good windows, airtightness

• Latent load remains the same!

• Thermostat (temperature control) → humidity is not controlled

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

• Thermostat (temperature control) → humidity is not controlled

• Need supplemental dehumidification in hot-humid and mixed-humid climates (high performance houses)

• Demonstrated in 20 research housesInformation Sheet 620: Supplemental Humidity Control

RR-0505: Residential Dehumidification Systems Research for Hot-

Humid Climates

Dehumidification

� High efficiency supplemental dehumidification options (standalone ducted boxes)

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation44

� E.g., draw from main space, dehumidified air to supply duct� Humidistat control in main

space (near thermostat)

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

Combustion

Safety

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

Safety

Combustion Safety

• Backdrafting risk in tighter houses

• Combustion air should be drawn from outside (“sealed combustion”)

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation4811/19/2008

Case Study:

Westford

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

Westford

Case Study House

(Westford Habitat for Humanity)

• Based on recently-built house

• Super-insulated enclosure

• Very airtight (1.5 ACH 50)

• Best-in-class mechanical systems

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

• Best-in-class mechanical systems

• Energy Star appliances

• Compact fluorescent lighting

• No renewable energy added: not NZE (PVs or solar DHW)

Westford House: 1.5 Story Single Family Home with Conditioned Basement (2200 ft2 total)

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation51

Westford House Under Construction

� Enclosure Details

• R-66 roof insulation

• R-45 walls

• R-26 basement walls

• R-10 basement

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation527 October 2008

• R-10 basement slab

• Low e double glazed windows

• 1.5 air changes per hour at 50 Pascals (“ACH50”)

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

� Mechanical Details� 96% AFUE Gas

Furnace, ECM motor

� 0.82 EF

Instantaneous Water

Heater

� Fantech Energy

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

� Fantech Energy

Recovery Ventilator

(ERV)

� MEL reduction 10%

� 19.3 MBH Heating

� 13.5 MBH Cooling

54

Instantaneous Water Heater

Fantech ERV

100

150

200

250

mill

ion

Btu

/yea

r (s

ourc

e en

ergy

)

100

150

200

250

mill

ion

Btu

/yea

r (s

ourc

e en

ergy

)

100

150

200

250

mill

ion

Btu

/yea

r (s

ourc

e en

ergy

)

100

150

200

250

mill

ion

Btu

/yea

r (s

ourc

e en

ergy

)

53%

Enclosure improvements

Mechanical improvements

Appliance, lights

Parametric Analysis

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

0

50

Bench

mar

kAs-

built

base

Air Sea

lR-4

6 W

allR-6

6 Roo

fR-2

6 Bsm

tTr

iple

glaz

ed95

% A

FUE

16 S

EER

HRVDHW

0.8

2 EF

CFLs

ES App

lianc

esSm

art C

ontro

ls

mill

ion

Btu

/yea

r (s

ourc

e en

ergy

)

Heating Cooling Hot Water Lighting Other Reduction 50%

0

50

100

Bench

mar

kAs-

built

base

Air Sea

lR-4

6 W

allR-6

6 Roo

fR-2

6 Bsm

tTr

iple

glaz

ed95

% A

FUE

16 S

EER

HRVDHW

0.8

2 EF

CFLs

ES App

lianc

esSm

art C

ontro

ls

mill

ion

Btu

/yea

r (s

ourc

e en

ergy

)

Heating Cooling Hot Water Lighting Other Reduction 50%

0

50

100

Bench

mar

kAs-

built

base

Air Sea

lR-4

6 W

allR-6

6 Roo

fR-2

6 Bsm

tTr

iple

glaz

ed95

% A

FUE

16 S

EER

HRVDHW

0.8

2 EF

CFLs

ES App

lianc

esSm

art C

ontro

ls

mill

ion

Btu

/yea

r (s

ourc

e en

ergy

)

Heating Cooling Hot Water Lighting Other Reduction 50%

0

50

100

Bench

mar

kAs-

built

base

Air Sea

lR-4

6 W

allR-6

6 Roo

fR-2

6 Bsm

tTr

iple

glaz

ed95

% A

FUE

16 S

EER

HRVDHW

0.8

2 EF

CFLs

ES App

lianc

esSm

art C

ontro

ls

mill

ion

Btu

/yea

r (s

ourc

e en

ergy

)

Heating Cooling Hot Water Lighting Other Reduction 50%

53%

Final Points

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

Final Points

What about LEED?• A green points-based rating system:

energy is only one component

• Some serious disappointments in actual energy performance

• USGBC now

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

• USGBC nowrequires usage data

• How is the house/building operated?

• ASHRAE 90.1 problems?

Source: BSI-007: Prioritizing Green—It's the Energy Stupid*

Questions/

Comments

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

Comments

To Take it Further…

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

Mitsubishi SEZ Ducted Indoor unitsMitsubishi SEZ Ducted Indoor unitsMitsubishi SEZ Ducted Indoor unitsMitsubishi SEZ Ducted Indoor unitsMitsubishi SEZ Ducted Indoor unitsMitsubishi SEZ Ducted Indoor unitsMitsubishi SEZ Ducted Indoor unitsMitsubishi SEZ Ducted Indoor units

••Provides for both heating and cooling, 17,000 BTU peak heating loadProvides for both heating and cooling, 17,000 BTU peak heating load

••Installed costs in the 4 BR 2,612 square foot “Carlisle” model was $7,600Installed costs in the 4 BR 2,612 square foot “Carlisle” model was $7,600

••One 15,000 BTU heads upstairs, One 18,000 BTU head downstairsOne 15,000 BTU heads upstairs, One 18,000 BTU head downstairs

••20,000 BTU gas fireplace as back up heating system20,000 BTU gas fireplace as back up heating system

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0C

OP

@ 7

0 F

Inte

rior

Heat Pump Behavior

© 2009

Building Science

Corporation

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

-5 5 15 25 35 45 55 65

T out (F)

CO

P @

70

F In

teri

or

Threshold COP 16 SEER w Defrost Lo

16 SEER w Defrost Lo Boston Design T