NORTH County MELBOURNE DISCUSSED

Post on 19-Feb-2016

56 views 0 download

Tags:

description

Short /Non-Audio. University of Florida SWS 5716 – Pedology Prof. Willie Harris. NORTH County MELBOURNE DISCUSSED LAKE Washington SOUTH County DISCUSSED. Brevard County, Florida USA. Site 01 Site 02 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

transcript

NORTH County MELBOURNE DISCUSSED

LAKE Washington SOUTH County DISCUSSED

JOe Ramos

01

University of FloridaSWS 5716 – Pedology

Prof. Willie Harris

Site 01Site 02Site 03Site 04

Brevard County, Florida USA

Short /Non-Audio

http://soils.usda.gov/technical/classification/orders/spodosols_map.html

Florida, Brevard County.

72 MILES

20 MILES

ATLANTIC OCEAN

Gulf of MEXICO

LAKE WASHINGTON

SAINT JOHNS RIVER

NORTH BOUNDARY

SOUTH BOUNDARY - Sebastian, Indian River County.

SOUTH BOUNDARY - Sebastian River.

SITE 02 Melbourne

SITE 04 South County

SITE 01 North County

SITE 03 Lake Washington

Map Study..

02

Orlando

8.5(28ft)meters - Elevation Delta

Mile : 000

Mile : 305

03

72 MILES

LAKE WASHINGTON

SAINT JOHNS RIVER

NORTH BOUNDARY

SOUTH BOUNDARY - Sebastian River.

SITE 02 Melbourne

SITE 04 South County

• INLET

• LOCKS

ATLANTIC OCEAN

http://plants.ifas.ufl.edu/guide/aqumap.gif

Map Study..

Brevard County, Florida

Mosquito County 1834

http://fcit.usf.edu/Florida/maps/pages/3600/f3698/f3698.htm

• approx 15 ft elevation

•approx 10 ft elevation

•approx 25 ft elevation

Map Study ..

04Saint Johns River Watershed Management, Florida

• Total Precipitation = 53 inch/48 years (Upper basin).

Map Study ..

05Saint Johns River Watershed Management, Florida

A

B

B

A

• @ 75 ft (bellow sea level) NW - county

•@ 300 ft (bellow sea level) SE - county

Floridian Aquifer

•Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 (6.7ft) in

SITE 02 (Melbourne), NRCS – Web Soils.

06

NRCS 07—Basinger Sand (Melbourne) per USAD soil report & NRCS Web Soil = Spodosol

Map Unit Setting Setting • Landform: Flats on marine terraces • Parent material: Sandy marine deposits

Properties and qualities • Slope: 0 to 2 percent • Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches • Drainage class: Poorly (human modified - moderate) drained • Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water• (Ksat): Very high (19.98 to 39.96 in/hr) • Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 (0 (wet season) – 60 (dry season) inches

• Available water capacity: Very low (about 2.8 inches)

• Discrepancy due to; Mapping Resolution or other factors ?

apatite
Delete this slide. It has WAY too much information on it for a presentation. Also, most of the info is on soils that you're not featuring in your talk.

NRCS – WEB SOIL SURVEY 07Melbourne

Alfisol

SITE 02 http://maps.google.com/

Horizon

^ A

^ AE

^ C&Btg

^ C

Drainage toSt. Johns River

(< 1.5 mile)

1) Three retention ponds and culverts drain south to Lake Washington road 2) Ponding at SITE 02 during excessive precipitation conditions.

SITE 02 - Melbourne

14SITE 02 – Melbourne 20 inch

30 inch

60 inch

Depth Horizon (s)

00-11 Ap

11-24 A1 - Dark gray

24-26 A2 - Black

26-34 A1 - Dark gray

34-39 AE

39-64 C&Bts

64-78 C

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

20 inch

30 inch

60 inch

80 inch

Depth Horizon (s)

00-11 ^ Ap

11-24 ^ A1 - Dark gray

24-26 ^ A2 – Black

26-34 ^ A3 - Dark gray

34-39 ^ AE

39-64 ^ C&Btg (92 cm)

64-78 ^ C

( ^ = Fill (Human Transported material(s))

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

08

SITE 02 – Melbourne

• 39-64 inch ( approx 100 – 160 cm) C&Btg• redox features (Fe masses, reduced matrices)• few white rock deposits (limestone ?).

apatite
Slide layout is OK. The second A1 (26-34") would be an A3. Bts isn't an allowed combination by USDA Soil Survey Manual dictates. C & Bts is not a possibility. You describe all horizons as gravelly or very gravelly. That woud strongly suggest that this is fill material to mitigate for wetness when your property was developed. What do you think? If true, you horizons would be ^Ap, ^C1, ^C2, etc. (human-transported material.

09

00 11 26 34 39 64 78 inch 200 cm

24

SITE 02 - Melbourne00 – 11

11 – 24

24 – 26

26 – 34

34 – 39

39 – 64

64 – 78 inch

Column: Infiltration Rate (moderate) Lowland - Flatwoods Surface Horizon (Ochric) Hydraulic Conductivity (moderate) Marine deposits Subsurface Horizon (Argillic) Available H2O (moderate) Slope (0-2%) Order (Alfisol)

Seasonal High Water (50 to 100 cm) Surface runoff (slow)

Erosion Potential (low) Dwelling / Basement / Septic / Absorption fields (server) Roads & streets (moderate)

^ Ap (10YR 3/1 very dark gray) Sandy loam; abrupt; gravelly texture; very friable; roots (many-fine and thin; common – thick ).

^ A1 (10YK 4/1 dark gray) Sandy loam; abrupt; gravelly; very friable; roots (common – thick and thin).

^ A2 (10YR 2/1 black) Sandy loam; abrupt; gravelly; friable; roots (few-thin).

^ A3 (10YK 4/1 dark gray) Sandy loam; abrupt; gravelly; friable.

^ AE (10YR 3/2 very dark grayish brown) Sandy clay loam; clear; gravelly; friable.

^ C&Btg (10YR 6/4 light yellowish brown) Sandy clay loam; clear; very gravelly; friable; roots (few – thick and thin); redoximorphic features (Fe masses, reduced matrices); few white rock deposits (limestone).

^ C (10YR 6/2 light brownish gray) Sandy clay loam; very gravelly; very friable.

(END site 02)

apatite
See my comments on previous slide. Also, eliminate structure description which can't be made with an auger excavation. Regarding structure, "massive" is always structureless never weak, moderate or strong. By saying massive your saying there is no soil structure.

10

Presently: Wetlands heavy-metals retention Area (SJWMD Construction Area)

Historically: Citrus Agriculture.

NRCS 17—EauGallie sand Map Unit Composition

• Eau-gallie and similar soils: 85 percent

 

Description of Eaugallie Setting

• Landform: Flats on marine terraces

• Parent material: Sandy and loamy marine deposits

 

Properties and qualities

• Slope: 0 to 2 percent

• Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 (200cm) inches

• Drainage class: Poorly drained • Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water

(Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.60 to 5.95 in/hr)

• Depth to water table: About 6 to 18 inches • Available water capacity: Low (about 3.3 inches)  

SITE 04 (South County), NRCS – Web Soils.

NRCS – WEB SOIL SURVEY

11

SITE 04

South - CountySpodosol

1

2

Horizon

O

A

E

Bh

Drainage to Sebastian River

• Site visited in February (dry season), drainage canal water elevation at significant delta from SITE locations A and B (yellow dot).• Shown drainage canal is primary drainage for southern Brevard county. • Soil analyzed at pit 1 was utilized for this report.• Soil pit 2 pit similar in horizon definition, except O horizon has been removed for construction by SJWMD.

.

SITE 04 – South County

12

TEXTURE & COLOR DESIGNATION & Available Water Content

 1) Horizon Ap1: SAND. 00 – 02 inch

(10YR 4/2 Dark-grayish-brown)  

2) Horizon Ap2: SAND.

02 – 06 inch

(10YR 6/1 Gray)

• Horizon E: SAND.

06 – 45 inch (10YR 7/2 Light-gray)

AWC (Root boundary @ 40 inch) = 05.715 cm/cm

Approx02 inchdepth

Approx05 inchdepth

Approx28 inchdepth

Sample

apatite
2 (02) comes before 4 (04) and you began presenting site 02 information before site 04. I suggest maintaing that logical sequence rather than switching to putting site 04 first. The more logical and consistent the sequence the easier it is for the audience to follow.

SITE 04 – South County

13

TEXTURE & COLOR DESIGNATION & Available Water Content

Root restriction layer 

4) Horizon Bh1 : LOAM SAND.

40 – 45 inch

(10YR 4/2 Dark grayish brown, GLEY 3/N Very dark gray)

Root restriction level.NOTE: hard Bh1 horizon, possibly due

unnaturally dry conditions (W.H.)

 

5) Horizon Bh2: SANDY CLAY LOAM

45 – 60 inch

(10YR 4/2 Dark grayish brown, GLEY 3/N Very dark gray),

 

6) Horizon Bh3: SANDY CLAY LOAM

45 – 60 inch h.

(10YR 4/3 Brown, GLEY 3/N Very dark gray),

Approx45 inchdepth

Approx48 inchdepth

Approx58 inch depth

Sample

4

3

2

1

00 Sample Inches

1 00 – 02

2 02 – 06

3 06 – 40

4 40 - 45

5,6 45-60 inch 150 cm

Horizon

Ap1 (10YR 4/2 Dark-grayish-brown) Sand; fine, granular structure; few fine and medium roots; non-plastic; moderate stickiness; smooth boundary.

Ap2 (10YR 6/1 Gray) Sand; fine, granular structure; very few fine and medium roots; non-plastic; moderate stickiness; smooth boundary.

E (10YR 7/2 Light-gray) Sand; fine, granular structure; non-plastic; slight stickiness; wavy boundary.

Bh1 (10YR 4/2 Dark grayish brown, GLEY 3/N Very dark gray) Loamy sand; moderate, platy structure; strongly cemented; slight plastic; moderate stickiness; irregular boundary; redoximorphic features (Mn concentrations).

Bh2 (10YR 4/2 Dark grayish brown, GLEY 3/N Very dark gray) Sandy Clay Loam; moderate, platy structure; strongly cemented; slight plastic; moderate stickiness; irregular boundary; redoximorphic features (Mn concentrations).

Bh3 (10YR 4/3 Brown, 10YR 4/2 Dark grayish brown, GLEY 3/N Very dark gray), Sandy Clay Loam; moderate, subangular–blocky structure; moderate cemented; moderate plastic; moderate–very stickiness ; redoximorphic features (Mn concentrations).

6

5

60

14

SITE 04 – South County

apatite
"Carbon content" and especially "oxygen content" aren't usual description items. Why do you describe the light-gray E horizon as having moderate carbon content, the same designation you gave for the Ap1? I would wager that the Ap1 has much more organic matter than the E. I suggest removing carbon and oxygen content references. Also, humic substances can't be judged from soil color alone. Your Bh2a would be a Bh2 and your Bh2b would be a Bh3.

Column:

Infiltration Rate (high)Available H2O (very low) 5 cm h20/ cm soil (root restriction) Hydraulic Conductivity (moderate - high)Seasonal High Water (100 to < 150 cm)Ponding (none)

Lowland (Flatwoods)Alluvium (Marine) depositSlope (@ 0-2% (nearly level)Surface runoff (very slow)Erosion Potential (very low)

Depth to soft rock (>100)Depth to hard rock (>150)

Dwelling & basement (slight)Septic tank absorption field (slight) Roads & streets (slight)

Surface Horizon (Ochric)Subsurface Horizon (Spodic)Order (Spodosol)

SITE 04 – South County

15(END site 04, END Presentation)

apatite
Good slide. I increased the font size a little. Why do you give slight limitation for septic tank absorption fields?