Post on 12-Jan-2016
description
transcript
NSRP Contribution in Advancing Information Technology in the Shipbuilding Enterprise
Presented by : Ron WoodDate: November 16, 2007
1
2
Authors
Dr. B. Gischner• Electric Boat
Corporation
J. Fowler• NAVSEA
L. Karns• ATI
R. Wood• Northrop Grumman
Ship Systems
3
Agenda
Product Information Modeling Business Process Technologies Common Parts Catalog Automatic Generation of Control Program for
Robotic Welding Shipyard Design Tool Enhancement Capture As-Built Models for 3D CAD Systems Shipyard Equipment Wireless Monitoring and
Control Open Architecture Standards Other Shipyard Computer Applications
Accuracy control – metrology, processes and toolsBenefit: Reduces rework labor, materials, cost and cycle time; enables automation
Steel Processing – Laser cutting, precision forming, and tab & slot technologyBenefit: 30% reduction in steel cutting costs; 8% reduction in steel plate usage in first production use
Joint Lean Learning Curve - Accelerate adoption of productivity Improvement
Benefit: Systematic, repeatable boosts in productivity from shop-level to design, engineering and supply chains
NSRP = Enterprise-wide CollaborationEffecting Large Scale Change with Industry-wide Solutions
Todd
NASSCO
Bath Iron Works
Northrop Grumman Ship Systems
Newport News
Suppliers
Electric Boat
NationwideeBusiness Networkfor Shipbuilding &
Ship Repair
eBusiness for Enterprise Integration – across construction, repair, logistics activities and suppliersBenefit: cuts labor and cycle time of daily processes by 60%
Common Parts Catalog – Enterprise standard, shared parts database
Benefit: facilitates standardization & IPDE initiatives; fewer parts to procure, inspect, certify, track, warehouse …
IT Interoperability – Integrating shipyard IT systems (CAD, CAM, Parts …) across firms & functionsBenefit: Reduces costs & acquisition cycle time, improves 1st time quality, enables outsourcing
5
Enterprise Integration Enterprise Integration Projects Projects
SIMSMARTSIMSMART
Simulation
P1
V1
Parts
Catalog / LibraryCatalog / Library
P1
V1
SIMSMARTSIMSMART
Simulation
P1
V1
P1
V1
Parts
Catalog / LibraryCatalog / Library
P1
V1
P1
V1
PipeStressPipeStress
P1
V1
PipeStressPipeStress
Diagrams
P&ID
P1
V1
Diagrams
P&ID
P1
V1
P1
V1
PDMPDMPDMPDM
Piping Detail
CAD
P1
V1
Piping Detail
CAD
P1
V1
Integrated Steel Processing EnvironmentIntegrated Steel Processing Environment
Material Identification & Material Identification & Procurement SystemProcurement System
Common Parts CatalogCommon Parts Catalog
AutoCAD AutoCAD Extension Extension Tier 1 & 2 Tier 1 & 2 YardsYards
Yard-SpecificArea
Yard-NeutralArea
Yard-SpecificArea
CAD
Yard Scheduler &
Planner
ISPE Data Warehouse
3D to 2DYard-Specific
Manufacturing Knowledge
base
Work Scheduler, Part Status, & Configuration
Tracking
Manuf.Engineering
Yard-Specific Work Packages
Geometry Extract by unit/assembly
Part Revision
Control Part Revision Checking
Yard-SpecificArea
Yard-NeutralArea
Yard-SpecificArea
CAD
Yard Scheduler &
Planner
ISPE Data Warehouse
3D to 2DYard-Specific
Manufacturing Knowledge
base
Work Scheduler, Part Status, & Configuration
Tracking
Manuf.Engineering
Yard-Specific Work Packages
Geometry Extract by unit/assembly
Part Revision
Control Part Revision Checking
• Real time status of materials• Integrated support for material planning and procurement• Re-use of knowledge through templates• Customizable• Open architecture • Proactive Agent based problem detection• Decision support and work flow automation
MIDAPSMIDAPS
• Real time status of materials• Integrated support for material planning and procurement• Re-use of knowledge through templates• Customizable• Open architecture • Proactive Agent based problem detection• Decision support and work flow automation
MIDAPSMIDAPS
Commercial/T-ship parts and standard interim parts
ISO Standards for Ship Construction & Repair
BIW / EBInter-SY part Equivalency
Std part technical descriptions
BMCS SPMSystems At EachSystems At Each ORACLE
NGSS
Part product structure
Part to document linking
RealReal--timetime
GDGD
part Equivalency
Std part technical descriptions
Feed LegacySystems At EachSystems At Each ORACLE
NGSSNGSS
Part product structure
Part to document linking
RealReal--timetime
Sharing
BIW / EBInter-SY part Equivalency
Std part technical descriptions
BMCS SPMSystems At EachSystems At Each ORACLEORACLE
NGSS
Part product structure
Part to document linking
RealReal--timetime
GDGD
part Equivalency
Std part technical descriptions
Feed LegacySystems At EachSystems At Each ORACLE
NGSSNGSS
Part product structure
Part to document linking
RealReal--timetime
Sharing
B a th Ir o n B a th Ir o n W o r k sW o r k sS M ES M E
V E S
E le c tr ic E le c tr ic B o a tB o a t
V E C
V E SS M ES M EV E C
V E S
V E C
S M ES M E
N A S S C ON A S S C O
V E C
S M ES M E
V E S
T o d dT o d d
V E SV E C
S M ES M E
In g a llsIn g a lls
N e w p o r t N e w p o r t N e w sN e w s
A v o n d a leA v o n d a le
B a th Ir o n B a th Ir o n W o r k sW o r k sS M ES M E
V E SV E SV E S
E le c tr ic E le c tr ic B o a tB o a t
V E CV E C
V E SV E SS M ES M EV E CV E C
V E SV E S
V E CV E C
S M ES M E
N A S S C ON A S S C ON A S S C ON A S S C O
V E CV E C
S M ES M E
V E SV E S
T o d dT o d d
V E SV E SV E CV E C
S M ES M E
In g a llsIn g a lls
N e w p o r t N e w p o r t N e w sN e w s
A v o n d a leA v o n d a le
J o in tJ o in te B u s in e s se B u s in e s s
N e t & N e t & P r o c e s sP r o c e s s
B a th Ir o n B a th Ir o n W o r k sW o r k sS M ES M E
V E S
E le c tr ic E le c tr ic B o a tB o a t
V E C
V E SS M ES M EV E C
V E S
V E C
S M ES M E
N A S S C ON A S S C O
V E C
S M ES M E
V E S
T o d dT o d d
V E SV E C
S M ES M E
In g a llsIn g a lls
N e w p o r t N e w p o r t N e w sN e w s
A v o n d a leA v o n d a le
B a th Ir o n B a th Ir o n W o r k sW o r k sS M ES M E
V E SV E SV E S
E le c tr ic E le c tr ic B o a tB o a t
V E CV E C
V E SV E SS M ES M EV E CV E C
V E SV E S
V E CV E C
S M ES M E
N A S S C ON A S S C ON A S S C ON A S S C O
V E CV E C
S M ES M E
V E SV E S
T o d dT o d d
V E SV E SV E CV E C
S M ES M E
In g a llsIn g a lls
N e w p o r t N e w p o r t N e w sN e w s
A v o n d a leA v o n d a le
J o in tJ o in te B u s in e s se B u s in e s s
N e t & N e t & P r o c e s sP r o c e s s
Integrated Shipbuilding Environment Integrated Shipbuilding Environment Tier 1 Tier 2 + NavyTier 1 Tier 2 + Navy
6
Interoperability Problem
Communication between diverse computer systems is a big challenge in today’s environment:• As CAD/CAE/CAM systems have expanded in the U.S.
shipyards, interoperability among these systems has become a major issue
• Interoperability is an issue within a shipyard as well as between partnering yards and with the Customer
These problems are exacerbated because:• Most recent and future ship design and build contracts
involve multiple shipyards• Length of time to design and build a ship often exceeds the
life span of current computer systems• Requirements for life cycle support of the ship will far
exceed the life span of current computer systems
7
Product Information Modeling
8
Computer AidedEngineering
Visualization
Simulation
ANALYZE
ComputerAided
Design
DEFINE
Planning/ERP
PLAN
Parts Order/Parts Catalog
SOURCE
ComputerAided
Manufacturing
MANUFACTURE
Product Data ManagerProduct Data Manager
Requirement Management
System
REQUIREMENTS
Computer AidedEngineering
Visualization
Simulation
ANALYZE
ComputerAided
Design
DEFINE
Planning/ERP
PLAN
Parts Order/Parts Catalog
SOURCE
ComputerAided
Manufacturing
MANUFACTURE
Product Data ManagerProduct Data Manager
Requirement Management
System
REQUIREMENTS
Product Data Initiatives Alignment
Total Ship Shock Trial
LEAPS
CPCISE
Navy ERP
SPARS
9
Information Interoperability Roadmap
Ship Product Model Data
Ship Structural Envelope
Distribution Systems
Equipment / Subsystems
Life Cycle Maintenance
Miscellaneous
HVACISO AP 227 Ed. 2
PipingISO AP 227:2001
Ship ArrangementISO AP 215:2004
Ship Moulded FormsISO AP 216:2003
Ship StructuresISO AP 218:2004
Reference Data Libraries
ISO 15926
Common Parts Catalog (CPC)
ElectricalISO AP 212:2001
Mechanical SystemsISO AP 227 Ed. 2
Cable TraysISO AP 227 Ed. 2
Finite Element Analysis
ISO AP 209:2001
Product Config/ Geometry
ISO AP 203:1994
Product Life Cycle SupportISO AP 239
Systems EngineeringISO AP 233
Computational Fluid DynamicsISO AP 237
Logistics / SparesISO AP 232:2002
Outfit & FurnishingsNSRP 0428:1992
Manufacturing Support
ISO APs 224, 238, 240
Standard Approved
Information Model
Prototype Translators
Testing Framework
Deployment, integration,testing
Standard In Work
10
Standard Approved
Standard Development
Information Model
Testing Framework
Prototype Translators
Information interoperability lifecycleRolesRoles
ISOISO
NSRPNSRP
NAVSEANAVSEA
NAVALNAVALPROGRAMPROGRAM
Information Information interoperabilityinteroperability
specificationspecification
ContractualSpecification
Deployment, integration, testing
Phases:Phases:RequirementsRequirementsdefinitiondefinition
Production deploymentProduction deployment
Tech
nology
Tech
nology
Bu
siness D
ecisions
Bu
siness D
ecisions
Well-Defined Solution Path –- much progress -- $17M to complete
11
Program OfficesProgram Offices
12
ISE Team Participants
13
Ship Arrangement
Zone Boundaries• Controlling Access• Design Authority• Cargo Stowage• Machinery Compartments• Crew Occupancy• Common Purpose Spaces
Stability•intact•damaged
Compartments• types• properties
(shape, coatings,adjacency,access….)
Loading conditions
General Subdivision of a Shipinto Spatially Bounded Regions
Cargoes•assignment to compartments•weight, •centre of gravity
14
Surface, wireframe and offset point representationsDesign, Production and Operations lifecyclesGeneral characteristicsMain dimensionsHullform geometryMajor internal surfacesHydrostaticsIntact Stability tables
Ship Moulded Forms
15
Technical DescriptionWeight Description
Ship Structures
Configuration Management • Class Approval• Approval Relationship• Change Administration• Promotion Status
Structural Parts• Feature• Plate • Edge Content• Opening• Profile• Profile Endcut
Production Design DataProduct Engineering Data
Geometric Representations• Wireframe• Complex Wireframe• Surfaces• Solids
Hull Cross Section
Product Structure • Generic Product Structure• System• Space• Connectivity• Assembly
16
Piping & HVAC
Connectivity•assembly• penetrations• ports
Pipe/Duct Flow Analysis and Sizing
Configuration Management of Product Structure
Versioning and Change Tracking
Bill of Materials
2-D and 3_-D Shape Representation•Diagrammatic Presentation• Solid Model Presentation• Interference Analysis
17
Electrical Design and Installation
Electrotechnical Plant• Plant, e.g., Automobile• Unit, e.g., Engine Control System• Subunit, e.g., Ignition System
Electrotechnical Systems• Buildings • Plants• Transportation Systems
Equipment Coverage• Power-transmission• Power-distribution• Power-generation• Electric Machinery• Electric Light and Heat• Control Systems
Data Supporting• Terminals and Interfaces• Functional Decomposition of Product• 3D Cabling and Harnesses• Cable Tracks and Mounting Instructions
18
Finite Element Analysis & Related Design
19
Data Archiving: STEP Standard Formats Preserve Datafor Future Use Regardless of changes to Hardware, OS or CAD System
10 20 30 40Years
Convert X to A
Convert A to B
Convert B to C
Convert C to N
System X
System A
System B
System C
System N
Preserving data for future use without standards require you to convert all your data each time you modify Hardware, OS or CAD system
10 20 30 40Years
Convert X to STEP
Convert A to
STEP
Convert B to
STEP
Convert C to
STEP
System X
System A
System B
System C
System N
Convert to long-timearchiving format (STEP)
once
20
ISE Summary
ISE has successfully demonstrated the potential of standards based data exchange to LEAN design and construction processes for HVAC, moulded forms, structures and piping, Electrical, Ship Arrangements, Steel Processing, Analysis
Web site: http://www.isetools.org/ Two major challenges lie ahead of us:
• Commercialization of this technology• Continuing to prototype standards based data exchange
in other application areas such as product life cycle
21
Multidisciplinary Modeling & Simulation Environment (MM&SE)
22
Full-Ship Live-Fire Shock Testing can be Prohibitively Expensive!
23
The Design of Naval Vessels Involves Various High-End Computational
Mechanics and Simulation Needs.
But Its Not Just Shock!
Acoustics
Hydrodynamics
24Critical Areas in Ultra-Large Container Carriers
Commercial Ships Also Have Full-Ship Analysis Requirements
De-Feature, Heal, Mid-Surface
Common Abstract Analysis Model
CAD 3D Design
StressAnalysis
ShockAnalysis
AcousticAnalysis
AnalysisContext
AnalysisContext
Related Modeling & Simulation Efforts
We Have Needs for Multi-Disciplinary Modeling &
Simulation (M&S) Environments Which Support
Varied Requirements
AnalysisContext
26
Multidisciplinary Modeling & Simulation Environment
To reduce the cycle time required to develop large scale full ship analysis models for strength, stress,
shock, and acoustic simulation and assessment.
27
CREATEComputational Research and Engineering Acquisition
Tools and Environments
28
Business Process Technologies
Todd
NASSCO
Bath Iron Works
Northrop Grumman Ship Systems
Newport News
Suppliers
Electric Boat
NationwideeBusiness Networkfor Shipbuilding &
Ship Repair
eBusiness for Enterprise Integration – across construction, repair, logistics activities and suppliersBenefit: cuts labor and cycle time of daily processes by 60%
29
Shipbuilding Partners and Suppliers (SPARS)
• Ability to establish Ad Hoc relationships for data exchange without extensive service infrastructures
• Ability to do business without obtaining specialized software
VIRTUAL ENTERPRISE SERVER
Association of Business & Technical Data in Bid Management Process
Workflow management of complex multi-tier process
Support of standards based business transaction formats via the WEB
Technical data exchange services
Collaborative tools
Secure Web
Server
VIRTUAL ENTERPRISE SERVER
Association of Business & Technical Data in Bid Management Process
Workflow management of complex multi-tier process
Support of standards based business transaction formats via the WEB
Technical data exchange services
Collaborative tools
Secure Web
Server
WEBBrowser
WEB Browser
Supplier/Sub
WEB Browser
Shipyard
VendorFurnished
Info
Vendor Drawing Review
PooledPurchase
Vendor Info
Request
AuctionReverse-Auction
RFPRFQ
VendorProcessRequest
SPARS Server Base
VendorTime &Material
Vendor Expedite
Desktop, Security, Doc Mgmt, Directory
Scenarios
30
CAMCAM
PDMPDM
MRP / ERPMRP / ERP
Part CatalogPart Catalog
CADCAD
WorkflowWorkflow
CustomersCustomersNavyNavyFleet ShipFleet Ship
Interfaces and Tools to exchange data Interfaces and Tools to exchange data among key IT systems and across the among key IT systems and across the enterprise’s organizationsenterprise’s organizations
- Engineering Data (ISE)- Engineering Data (ISE)
- Inter-organization Transaction Data - Inter-organization Transaction Data (SPARS)(SPARS)
- Parts Data (Common Parts Catalog, - Parts Data (Common Parts Catalog, Mat’l Mat’l Stds)Stds)
- - Manufacturing data (ISPE)Manufacturing data (ISPE)
CADCAD
PDMPDM
MRP / ERPMRP / ERP
Part CatalogPart Catalog
Navy LogisticsNavy Logistics
Naval YardsNaval Yards
CommonCommon Parts Catalog Parts Catalog
GD GD YardYard
CAMCAM
CAMCAM
PDMPDM
MRP / ERPMRP / ERP
Part CatalogPart Catalog
CADCAD
WorkflowWorkflow
WorkflowWorkflow
NG NG YardYard
SuppliersSuppliersSuppliersSuppliersSuppliersSuppliers
Private Private Sector Sector Repair Repair YardYard
CommonCommon Parts Catalog Parts Catalog
Industry Consensus Industry Consensus eBusiness ModeleBusiness Model
Integrated Shipbuilding Environment for the Integrated Shipbuilding Environment for the Networked Functional Capability across the Networked Functional Capability across the
EnterpriseEnterprise
31
Shipbuilding Partners and Suppliers
Virtual Enterprise that simplifies and speeds business interactions
$2M in cost reductions per process implementation at $2M in cost reductions per process implementation at each shipyardeach shipyard
32
SPARS Current Processes
33
SPARS 2007 – 2008 Processes
34
DB-2 Database
WebSphereWeb Server
MQ Series(Messaging)
Email Service
LDAPAuthentication
Service
VF
I / GF
I
VP
BM
T
VB
ID / V
ES
T
VS
RS
VR
EQ
/ VT
PR
Supplier Web Browser Interface
VN
CRVPA VIR
WE
BIN
AR
T
RA
ININ
G
VQ
UO
TE
VE
S:S
hip
yard In
terface P
rogram
Applications
Services
SPARS Virtual Enterprise Server “How It All Integrates”
Workflow
“Patterned Oriented Architecture”
. VX
PD
VIPP (System Integration)
Business Intelligence (Data Mining)
Contract Administration Mgt Tool Set
Supplier/Shipyard User Administration
35
Archive
VFI Data
TPRTemplates
VTPRTPR’s
Apply Templates
SCMILSEngineeringQAPlanning
VBID
PO#PO dateRevised
TPRAdditional
Data
POAWARD
VBIDData
VBIDTemplates
Suppliers
Buyers Reviewers
POSS BAS VQuote / iMarsW link (MQ)
Reference (shared key?)
SCM Approval for Award
VFIPDM
Manually Create
VFI Override
Auto-Create
VFI
VFI Coord
Suppliers
ReviewersCOGs
VFIData
VPASuppliers
Reviewers/ Approvers
Payment Notification
Invoice Amount
VIR
Reviewers/ Approvers
Archive VIR DataReconcile: Is change within/outside scope of contract
Emai
l “TP
R is re
ady”
to
Req
uisit
ion
Gro
up
Revision per Reconciliation
(subject to review) – Should be minimum of
SCA included in upfront review
and approval of TPR
Emai
l to
Engi
neer
s
for r
econ
cilia
tionTPR List
-----
•Select Applicable TPRs* Assign Name*Assign TPR Start & Complete Dates*Revise TPR prior to VBID (add’l data)*Revise TPR prior to award
ECN Process
TPR Under Change
Management Changes After
This Point Require
Revisions
Note: Original driver is Master Equipment List (MEL) and Schedule driver is Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)
Supplier Requested
Customer Requested
ECN
SuppliersBuyers
Buyers
Future State
36
Common Parts Catalog
Common Parts Catalog – Enterprise standard, shared parts databaseBenefit: facilitates standardization & IPDE initiatives; fewer parts to procure, inspect, certify, track, warehouse …
37
CPC is Used by the Shipbuiding Enterprise at Different Levels
38
EB, BIW and NGSS have Implemented a Common Parts Catalog
39
• shipyard parts catalog• part search and retrieve repository• shipyard, supply chain, Navy collaborator • future business facilitator
Common Parts Catalog is:
Inter-shipyard Part Equivalency
ShipyardPart toNSN X-Ref
User FriendlySearch
Document toPart X-Ref
40
65% of the Navy’s Surface Ship, Submarine, and Amphibious Procured
Material is Now Standardized and Configuration Managed in CPC
41
Automatic Generation of Control Program for Robotic Welding
(AUTOGEN)
Automate the generation of robotic control programs directly from CAD data, weld process tables and production planning information
42
AUTOGEN
completed in 2003 efforts have continued under different funding
streams. Current effort focuses:
• industrially hardening the developmental code and populating the necessary data infrastructure toward production use
• The team is also adding an Operator Graphical User Interface (GUI) and documenting the individual use cases in support of intended commercial release of the software.
43
Ship Check Data Capture
Purpose• data collection of as-built ship
conditions in digital format using currently available (COTS) 3D laser scanners and digital cameras
Benefits• provides measurements of as-built
conditions, readily available, at any time as needed
• provides means to get accurate measurements of components, piping, etc. from ship’s lines
• provides cost savings compared to traditional ship checks
• eliminates return visits to ship for missed measurements
• minimizes measurement errors• minimizes rework at construction
Uses• take measurements of as-built
space elements directly from raw scans
• validate 3D CAD models to as-built data
• create solid 3D electronic models of the as-built space
• Archive the data captured for future use
44
Ship Check Data CaptureHardware
3Dguru 3D Laser Scanner
3Dguru 3D Laser Scanner Z+F Imager 5003
3D Laser Scanner
Z+F Imager 5003 3D Laser Scanner
45
Ship Check Data Capture Data Processing / Data Analysis
Post processing and modeling of the data collected use various software applications, including:• BitWyse LASERGen• LeicaGeosystems Cyclone• InnovMetric PolyWorks• Raindrop Geomagic Studio• INUS Technology RapidForm• UGS NX Imageware• Dassault Systèmes SolidWorks• Vexcel FotoG• Intergraph SmartPlantReview
Models were analyzed in various CAD systems• CATIA• AutoCAD• Intergraph’s Integrated Ship Design and Production (ISDP)
46
Ship Check at Bender Shipyard
280 ft. Candies Inspection, Maintenance and Repair (IMR) Vessel under construction at Bender was used for ship check (May 02 -05, 2006)
Ship checks were also conducted onboard the TWR841 and SSGN729 during the FY05 and FY06 NSRP Ship Check Projects
Candies IMR under construction at Bender
47
Ship Check Data Capture
Candies IMRSpaces Ship Checked: •Bow Thrusters•Engine Room•Moon Pool•Moon Pool Door•Z-Drive Cavity•Underside Stern•Z-Drives
48
Ship Check Data Capture IMR Valve Station Ship Check: As-scanned Data to
As-built 3D Model
49
Ship Check Metrics (Cost/Time Savings)
Ship check data capture/post processing of Candies IMR Engine Room Bulkhead select components:• Realized Cost Savings = $3,079/$8,327 = 37%• Realized Time Savings = 46/118 = 39%
Cost savings is above the project goal of 30% Time savings is above the project goal of 35% Savings shown are only for first ship check and do not include
elimination of future ship checks for the same ship space Ship checks with the data capture technologies provides
additional cost/time savings by• Eliminating the need to go back to the ship for missed
measurements • Providing complete and accurate as-built space information
(more than the traditional ship check with tape measure), which in turn reduces construction costs and scrap, and saves refit time
50
Ship Check
Conclusions Take measurements from scan data
• Not intuitive, requires experience• Advocated by scanning software vendors
Validate 3D CAD models to as-built data• Overlay as-design CAD model onto point cloud to check
placement of components• Overlay new design model onto point cloud to check interferences
Create 3D as-built arrangements from the scan data• Use library parts to place on location in the scan• Cost effective
Create surface models for visualization and analysis • Cost effective
Create 3D as-built models of the entire space from the scan data • Create primitives (cylinders, cubes, etc.) from point cloud• Not cost effective at present• Manual effort (software vendors need to automate the process)
Reduced ship check costs: fewer days, fewer personnel Elimination of return visits to the ship for missed measurements Obtaining measurements which are difficult or unsafe for human reach
51
Shipyard Design Tool Projects
52
Shipyard Design Tool Projects
53
Shipyard Equipment Wireless Monitoring and Control
(WEMACS) Objective: integrate existing commercial
systems and newly developed technologies to provide a comprehensive solution for the monitoring, control and utilization analysis of shipyard material handling equipment.
Accomplishment: • Operator training re-examined, as expired/ unnecessary authorizations removed Automatic access control to equipment•Equipment start-up, safety and operational checklists redeÞ ned and reorganized for logic and relevance•Mimimized the effects of potential schedule delays as a result of unexpected equipment failure Geographical display of every material handling asset so availability, location and operating status can immediately be determined
54
Open Architecture Standards
55
Navy Product Data Initiative Mission Statement
To specify the requirements for and drive the implementation of
product data systems based on an open architecture having suitable functionality and
enterprise-wide interoperability to support affordable Navy ships design,
construction and service life support.
56
Navy Product Data InitiativeOrganization
NPDI Steering Group
NPDI Planning Group
IPDE Specification Working Group
Verification & Validation
Working Group
• NPDI Steering Group: Deputy PEOs (Subs, Ships, Carriers), NSRP ECB
• NPDI Planning Group: Representatives from NAVSEA, PEOs, Shipbuilders
• NPDI IPDE Specification Working Group: membership includes NGSS, NGNN, GDEB, NASSCO, NGIT, NSWC Carderock, CSC
• NPDI Verification and Validation Working Group: combination of PG and WG augmented as needed
57
Ships Information Life Cycle
Shipbuilder involvement
Core data
Concept
50-7
0 ye
ars
Design & Construction
Evaluations & applications of
core data
Retirement
In-service
Commissioning
Navy’s need for ship information is long lastingNavy’s need for ship information is long lasting
58
What’s Out There Today?Program Location 3D CAD
CV(RCOH)* NGNN AutoCADCV(RCOH)* NNSY AutoCAD
CVN 21 NGNN Catia 4 AECCVN 21 EB Catia 4 AECDD(X) BIW Catia 5DD(X) NGSS Pascagoula Catia 5
DDG 51 BIW CADDS 5DDG 51 NGSS Pascagoula Dim 3DDG 51 LM AutoCAD
DDX NGSS Pascagoula Catia 5DDX BIW Catia 5
Deepwater NGSS Avondale Ship ConstructorLCAC Textron AutoCAD
LCS LM* LM Ship ConstructorLCS LM* Marinette Ship ConstructorLCS LM* Bollinger Ship ConstructorLCS GD* BIW AutoCADLCS GD* Austal AutoCADLHA 6* NGSS Pascagoula Velum/AutoCADLHD 8* NGSS Pascagoula Velum/AutoCADLPD 17 NGSS Avondale ISDPLPD 17 BIW ISDPLPD 17 NGSS Pascagoula ISDPSSN 21 EB CADDS 3SSN 21 NGNN VIVIDSSN 23 EB Catia 4 MechSSGN* EB Catia 4 MechT-AKE NASSCO TribonVirginia EB Catia 4 MechVirginia NGNN Catia 4 Mech
* ship partially modeled in 3D
59
Navy Product Data Initiative
WHY• High cost of Naval shipbuilding and the cost of making changes• Cost of Development, Implementation, and Maintenance of Integrated
Product Data Environments (IPDEs) -- Each new Program specifies different IPDE requirements
• Application and Data Architectures Limit Access, Interoperability, & Re-use NSRP assembled an industry planning team in response to a Navy
request to develop an Industry-wide approach to more effective Integrated Product Data Environments (IPDEs).
NPDI is a four-phased Navy/industry shipbuilding enterprise effort • Phase 0 defined the initiative. • Phase 1 was a five month planning effort to develop the IPDE specification
outline and Concept of Operations. • Phase 2 is approximately a one-year effort to
– develop the initial Navy IPDE specification to be invoked in future shipbuilding and ship repair contracts;
– develop a verification mechanism to measure specification compliance; and, – stakeholders planning for implementation.
• Phase 3 is the implementation phase Phase 0 and Phase 1 are complete. Phase 2 is in processs.
Vendors DevelopSoftware to Comply
Navy Product Data InitiativePhases
Software Vendors
Shipyards
NSRP
NAVY
DefineProblem(s)
Shipyards Develop/Modify IPDEto Comply
Develop IPDEPerformance
Specification andValidation/Verification
Process
AssembleTeam:Shipyards/Navy/Software
Vendors
ApproveSpecification
Invoke onShipbuilding
Contracts
NavyValidates
IPDEPerformance
CompliantIPDE Deployed
ShipbuildingPrograms Obtain
Benefit
Phase 0
Phase 1
Phase 0
Phase 2
Phase 1
Phase 3 -
Implementation
Phase 2
61
Phase II Spec Development ~ 1 yr
Phase I Preparation5 mo
Way Ahead
Specification Phase Implementation
PhasePhase 0 Prelim Plng
Implementation • Navy• Shipyards• Vendors• Validation Process
Future State
Future State
CompleteComplete
CompleteComplete
Starting UpStarting Up
62
Mobile & Wireless Expansion of Shipyard Systems
Build a Web interface that would allow a shipyard supervisor to easily gain access to timekeeping information.
Benefits: • data easily accessible the other
benefits realized• reduction of time a Supervisor spends
on administrative tasks• elimination of data re-entry, • improved accuracy of data, timeliness
of data and reduction of paperwork.
63
Project Work Order System
Library based work order design, edit, and management system developed using Microsoft .NET technologies.
allows users to create documents/forms on the fly and away from the desk using tablet computers with handwriting and voice recognition.
This would allow for more timely and accurate document creation, as well as, immediate signature authorization.
allows users to create virtually any customer-specific forms (through the use of templates) and make them available to all users on the system.
possible to have a central repository for all forms/templates that a company uses.
Finally, the data retrieved from the forms could easily be integrated into any existing systems that can read an XML document allowing the seamless transfer of data between the systems and the ability for programmers to create validation logic for use in the system
Due to its flexibility and customizability, the system would help in automating the process of work order creation and execution.
Questions ?www.nsrp.org