OA Advocacy Today

Post on 23-Feb-2016

29 views 0 download

Tags:

description

OA Advocacy Today. The purposes of power in a networked world. Cameron Neylon – COASP13 - Riga. 18 September 2013 - @ cneylon – cneylon@plos.org. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/13/julia-gillard-labor-purpose-future. The purpose of power is to shift the consensus…. Permanently. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

transcript

OA Advocacy TodayThe purposes of power in a networked world

Cameron Neylon – COASP13 - Riga18 September 2013 - @cneylon – cneylon@plos.org

1

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/13/julia-gillard-labor-purpose-future

The purpose of power is to shift the

consensus…

Permanently.

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

Enthusiasts

Early majority Late majority

Laggards

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

Enthusiasts

Early majority Late majority

Laggards

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

Enthusiasts

Early majority Late majority

Laggards

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

Enthusiasts

Early majority Late majority

Laggards

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

Enthusiasts

Early majority Late majority

Laggards

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

Enthusiasts

Early majority Late majority

Laggards

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

Enthusiasts

Early majority Late majority

Laggards

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

Enthusiasts

Early majority Late majority

LaggardsPeak of inflated expectations

Valley of negativity

Plateau of productivity

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

Enthusiasts

Early majority Late majority

Laggards• Excitement• Potential• Risk• Disruption• Change

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

Enthusiasts

Early majority Late majority

Laggards• Functionality• Reliability• Ease of use• Compatibility

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

Enthusiasts

Early majority Late majority

Laggards

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

Enthusiasts

Early majority Late majority

Laggards

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

Enthusiasts

Early majority Late majority

Laggards

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

Other key insights from tech marketing

• The Innovators Dilemma – Clayton Christensen– Disruptive technologies achieve market dominance through

addressing a recognised and current need, but not that being disrupted. Adoption then drives the disruption.

• Persuading Scientists – Hamid Ghanadan– Frame the need through taking a leadership position,

provide objective data and information to inform, then promote benefits and features.

“You cannot lead from the middle but you need to communicate your product to the mainstream. Disruption is a side effect of technology adoption”

18

Consensus as a collective action problem

Consensus as a collective action problem

Consensus as a collective action problem

Consensus as a collective action problem

Consensus as a collective action problem

Consensus as a collective action problem

Consensus as a collective action problem

Consensus as a collective action problem

• Policy• Narrative and

messaging• Consistency and

coherence

27

How can we work together?

• We need to collaborate and communicate–A place at the heart of policy making–Working for a coherent global policy agenda

• We also need to compete to provide the full benefits of OA–Effective markets, differentiated products

• What other organizations, formal or informal do we need?

28

or

The purpose of power is to shift the

consensus…

The purpose of influence is to shift the

consensus…

…and ultimately it is the consensus that

matters