Post on 03-Jan-2016
description
transcript
OPTIMA
OPTIMAOptimisation for Sustainable
Water Resources Management
Turkish Stakeholder Meeting
19-20 April 2006
IZMIR
22OPTIMA
As stated in D02 of OPTIMA on Socio-Economic Framework
Analysis;
“in line with one of the key tasks taken up in the EC Water
Framework Directive, the OPTIMA dissemination strategy is
centered on actively involving interested parties such as
relevant government departments, local communities,
water utilities, industry and commerce, agriculture,
consumers and environmental groups throughout the
project lifecycle” .
Concepts and Aims
33OPTIMA
Based on this strategy;
a 2-day stakeholder workshop was organized by SUMER between April 19-20, 2006 in Izmir, to set the basis for the optimization procedure of OPTIMA to be applied for the Gediz case study.
Invitations were extended to a total of 106 persons, representing local, regional and national governmental/private institutions and NGOs.
Of the total invited, 45 stakeholders contributed to the meeting.
44OPTIMA
The distribution of participants with respect to the sectors and institutions
SECTOR GOVERNMENTAL MUNICIP. NGOs IAs* UNIVER.**INDUSTR
Y
FUNCTIONPlanning / Monitoring /
Management
Research /
Monitoring
Monitoring
Planning / Monitoring
Domestic water users
Irrigation
Water Users
ResearchIndustrial
water users
GROUP 1 DSI (2 Persons)THAEM
(1)IZMIR MoE Prov. Dir. (1)
IZSU-Izmir Mun.(1) GEDIZ IA
(1)
Min. of Agr. (1)
MoE-Aegean
Forestry (1)
GROUP 2 DSI (2)
MoE-Aegean
Forestry (1)
IZMIR MoE Prov. Dir. (1)
GEDIZ IA
(1)DEU (1)
Aegean Region
Cham. of Ind. (1)
GROUP 3 DSI (1)THAEM
(1)
MANISA MoE Prov.
Dir. (1)IZSU-Izmir Mun (1)
IZMIR Bird Paradise Ass. (1)
EGE UN (Agr.
Fac.) (1)
Min. of Agr. (1) UCPINAR Mun. (1)
GROUP 4 DSI (1)
MoE-Aegean
Forestry (1)
MANISA MoE Prov.
Dir. (1)IZSU-Izmir Mun (1) GEMA (1)
SALİHLİ Left Bank
(1)
EGE UN. (Agr.Fac.) (1)
EIE (1)
GROUP 5 DSI (1)THAEM
(1)
MANISA MoE Prov.
Dir. (1)IZSU-Izmir Mun (1)
Aegean Forestry Foundation (1)
SALİHLİ Left Bank
(1)
EİE (1) DMİ (State
Meteo Org)(1)
55OPTIMA
The distribution of participants with respect to the sectors and institutions
SECTOR GOVERNMENTAL MUNICIP. NGO IAs UNI.s IND.
FUNCTION Plan. , Mon., Man.
Res., Mon.
Mon. Plan., Mon.,
Man.
Irrig. Wat. Users
Res. Industrial water users
GROUP 1
GROUP 2
GROUP 3
GROUP 4
GROUP 5
66OPTIMA
The workshop has fulfilled the requirement of a participatory
approach, which is viewed in D02 of OPTIMA “as a means to
develop the tools needed for an optimum management of water
resources in direct, active consultation with the stakeholders,
leading to the creation of a favorable ‘atmosphere’ that is
aimed at gaining the understanding and acceptance of the
eventual OPTIMA findings by all stakeholders”
Concepts and Aims
77OPTIMA
The basic objective of the workshop also follows from D02 such
that “the active involvement of the stakeholders is … considered as
a means to assist … in the identification of any “conflicting”
demands on water resources, which can then be further assessed
in the context of possible ‘development scenarios’ … to
demonstrate through the use of appropriate modeling tools how
such conflicts could be reconciled in the context of a sustainable
approach to water resources management”
Concepts and Aims
88OPTIMA
Background Materials
The online “Water Issues Questionnaire” and the associated “Glossary” (derived from D01.1 on Requirements and Constraints Report prepared by FEEM);
D02 on Socio-Economic Framework Analysis prepared by IRMCO;
The online “CORRIDOIO ZERO Methodology for SH Active Involvement Within Decisional Process for water management Optimization” and the SH Workshop Guidelines prepared by Corridoio Zero;
The online questionnaires “CONSTRAINTS” and “INSTRUMENTS” prepared by ESS.
99OPTIMA
Using the above inputs and guidelines, the program for a two
day workshop was worked out in a way to best derive
stakeholder ideas and preferences, which could also reflect
those of various sectors (i.e., planners, decision makers, water
users, researchers, and NGOs).
The organization of the workshop activities was also intended
to facilitate scenario development for the optimum
management of the Gediz Basin.
Background Materials
1010OPTIMA
Workshop Program
1111OPTIMA
Questionaire I
The online “Water Issues Questionnaire” and the associated
“Glossary”, has been used as “Questionaire I” regarding all
issues ;
- Physical Conditions,
- Water Management,
- Water Demand,
- Water Supply
1212OPTIMA
Questionaire I
Although this questionnaire was already run within the first year
of the project, the results were not considered very reliable
since the stakeholders selected then were requested to fill in
the forms via e-mail or fax.
Accordingly, this questionnaire was repeated at the workshop
to update Turkey’s issues questionnaire database. At this first
step of the workshop, each stakeholder was requested to fill in
the forms individually.
1313OPTIMA
Questionaire II
This questionnaire was filled out by 5 different groups of
stakeholders to determine priorities and trends with regard to
water issues.
Through this questionnaire, it was intended to identify the key
issues in the Gediz Basin, that should be addressed in scenario
development.
1414OPTIMA
This questionnaire specifies the contraints on the optimization
procedure, having the objectives and scenarios defined in
Questionnaire II.
Questionaire III
GLOBAL CONSTRAINTS
CONCEPT VALUE
Overall Supply / Demand ratio >
Reliability of supply (average over all nodes/days) > %
Cost / Benefit ratio >
Total benefits > M€
Investment costs < M€
Total cost including penalties < M€
Unallocated water (daily average flow) < m3/s
Overall water content change/decrease < Mm3
Relative content change/decrease < %
Days with flooding <
1515OPTIMA
SECTORAL CONSTRAINTS
AGRICULTURE
Overall Supply / Demand ratio >
Reliability of supply (daily average over all nodes) > %
Cost / Benefit ratio >
HEAVY INDUSTRY
Overall Supply / Demand ratio >
Reliability of supply (daily average over all nodes) > %
Cost / Benefit ratio >
LIGHT INDUSTRY
Overall Supply / Demand ratio >
Reliability of supply (daily average over all nodes) > %
Cost / Benefit ratio >
COMMERCE
Overall Supply / Demand ratio >
Reliability of supply (daily average over all nodes) > %
Cost / Benefit ratio >
Questionaire III
1616OPTIMA
SERVICES
Overall Supply / Demand ratio >
Reliability of supply (daily average over all nodes) > %
Cost / Benefit ratio >
HOUSEHOLDS
Overall Supply / Demand ratio >
Reliability of supply (daily average over all nodes) > %
Cost / Benefit ratio >
TOURISM
Overall Supply / Demand ratio >
Reliability of supply (daily average over all nodes) > %
Cost / Benefit ratio >
SECTORAL CONSTRAINTS
Questionaire III
1717OPTIMA
Questionaire III
LOCAL (NODE specific) CONSTRAINTS
NODE CONCEPT FROM TO VALUE
1818OPTIMA
Questionaire IV
This questionnaire specifies the instruments to be used for each
scenario within the optimization procedure, having the objectives
and scenarios defined in Questionnaire II and constraints in
Questionnaire III
1919OPTIMA
SCOPE OF APPLICATION: GLOBAL
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
COSTSEFFECTIVENESS
Parameter affected, valueInvestment Operational
Questionaire IV
2020OPTIMA
1.SECTORIAL INSTRUMENTSIRRIGATED AGRICULTURE
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
COSTSEFFECTIVENESS
Parameter affected, valueInvestment Operational
RAINFED AGRICULTURE
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
COSTSEFFECTIVENESS
Parameter affected, valueInvestment Operational
HEAVY INDUSTRY
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
COSTSEFFECTIVENESS
Parameter affected, valueInvestment Operational
Questionaire IV
2121OPTIMA
LIGHT INDUSTRY
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
COSTSEFFECTIVENESS
Parameter affected, valueInvestment Operational
DOMESTICMUNICIPAL
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
COSTSEFFECTIVENESS
Parameter affected, valueInvestment Operational
TOURISTIC
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
COSTSEFFECTIVENESS
Parameter affected, valueInvestment Operational
Questionaire IV
2222OPTIMA
COMMERCIAL
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
COSTSEFFECTIVENESS
Parameter affected, valueInvestment Operational
SERVICES
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
COSTSEFFECTIVENESS
Parameter affected, valueInvestment Operational
Questionaire IV
2323OPTIMA
Results of QuestionairesQ1
OVERALL RESULTS FOR QUESTIONNAIRE I:
PHYSICAL CONDITIONS:
- Watershed Degradation
- Water Scarcity
- Droughts
WATER MANAGEMENT:
- Education and Awareness
- Institutional Framework:
- Institutional Responsibilities
- Active Participation
2424OPTIMA
WATER DEMAND:- Agriculture
- Surface Water Demands- Groundwater Demands
- Industry:- Surface Water Pollution by Industry
WATER SUPPLY:- Quality:
- Surface Water Quality- Groundwater Quality
- Infrastructures:- Sanitations: Sewers and Treatment
Results of QuestionairesQ1
RESULTS OF QUETIONAIRE 1 IN EXCEL SHEET
2525OPTIMA
Results of QuestionairesQ2
OVERALL RESULTS FOR QUESTIONNAIRE II:
Issues in order of priority:
1.Water pollution (5/5)
2. Revision of the existing irrigation network (3/5)
3. Participatory water management (2/5)
4. Water scarcity (2/5)
5. Monitoring networks (2/5)
The least important issue: Water demand by tourism
2626OPTIMA
Results of QuestionairesQ3
GLOBAL CONSTRAINTS (the numbers in parentheses show the averages of group responses)
CONCEPT VALUE
Overall Supply / Demand ratio >1.3/ 1.2/ 1/1 (1.125)
Reliability of supply (average over all nodes/days) > 70/ 95// 90/90 (86.25)%
Cost / Benefit ratio > 1/1.5/1.5/1 (1.25)
Total benefits > M€
Investment costs < M€
Total cost including penalties < M€
Unallocated water (daily average flow) < /0 /0.15 /0.10 m3/s
Overall water content change/decrease < /0/100/50 Mm3
Relative content change/decrease < /10/10 %
Days with flooding <6/ 5 /2/1/1
2727OPTIMA
Results of QuestionairesQ3
SECTORAL CONSTRAINTS
AGRICULTURE
Overall Supply / Demand ratio >1.2/1.2/1.2/1 (1.15)
Reliability of supply (daily average over all nodes) > 90/ 90/90/90 (90) %
Cost / Benefit ratio > 1/ 1//2/1 (1.25)
HEAVY INDUSTRY
Overall Supply / Demand ratio < 1
Reliability of supply (daily average over all nodes) > 90 %
Cost / Benefit ratio > 1
LIGHT INDUSTRY
Overall Supply / Demand ratio < 1/1/1.5/1 (1.125)
Reliability of supply (daily average over all nodes) > 95 /90/90 %
Cost / Benefit ratio > /1/2/2/1
2828OPTIMA
COMMERCE
Overall Supply / Demand ratio >0.90/1.5/1
Reliability of supply (daily average over all nodes) > 90/ 80/90 %
Cost / Benefit ratio > 1/1/2/1
SERVICES
Overall Supply / Demand ratio >1/0.90/1.5/1 (1.1)
Reliability of supply (daily average over all nodes) > 90/100/90/ 90/90 %
Cost / Benefit ratio > /0.90/2/2/1
HOUSEHOLDS
Overall Supply / Demand ratio >1.5/1.2/1.5/1(1.3)
Reliability of supply (daily average over all nodes) > > 95/110/98/100/95 (100)%
Cost / Benefit ratio >0.80/1
TOURISM
Overall Supply / Demand ratio >1/1.5/1
Reliability of supply (daily average over all nodes) >100/99 /90/90 %
Cost / Benefit ratio > 1.2/2/1
Results of QuestionairesQ3
2929OPTIMA
LOCAL (NODE specific) CONSTRAINTS
NODE CONCEPT FROM TO VALUE
Demirkopru reservoir
Amount of water to be stored
850 Mm3
WetlandWater to be allocated
5 Mm3
Results of QuestionairesQ3
3030OPTIMA
Results of QuestionairesQ4
SCOPE OF APPLICATION: GLOBAL
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
COSTSEFFECTIVENESS
Parameter affected, valueInvestment Operational
Rehabilitation and renewal of irrigation technologies (3/5)
Construction of water treatment plants (3/5)
Education & training of water users (2/5)
Revision of legislation (2/5)
Completion of Gördes and Yiğitler Reservoirs (2/5)
3131OPTIMA
1.SECTORIAL INSTRUMENTSIRRIGATED AGRICULTURE
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
COSTSEFFECTIVENESS
Parameter affected, valueInvestment Operational
Revision and rehabilitation of irrigation networks (5/5)
Applying better irrigation technologies in the field such drip irrigation (3/5)
Completion of reservoir investments (2/5)
Results of QuestionairesQ4
3232OPTIMA
Results of QuestionairesQ4RAINFED AGRICULTURE
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
COSTSEFFECTIVENESS
Parameter affected, valueInvestment Operational
Terracing (2/5)
Proper crop pattern selection(2/5)
HEAVY INDUSTRY
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
COSTSEFFECTIVENESS
Parameter affected, valueInvestment Operational
3/5 of the groups do not consider the existence of heavy industry in Gediz Basin
Construction of industrial wastewater treatment centers (2/5)
3333OPTIMA
Results of QuestionairesQ4
LIGHT INDUSTRY
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
COSTSEFFECTIVENESS
Parameter affected, valueInvestment Operational
Construction of a common industrial wastewater treatment plants for Kemalpasa Ind. Zone (3/5)
Reuse of recycled water from treatment centers in irrigation (3/5)
DOMESTICMUNICIPAL
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
COSTSEFFECTIVENESS
Parameter affected, valueInvestment Operational
Construction of domestic wastewater treatment centers (4/5)
Rehabilitation of domestic water distribution networks (2/5)
3434OPTIMA
Results of QuestionairesQ4TOURISTIC
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
COSTSEFFECTIVENESS
Parameter affected, valueInvestment Operational
3/5 of groups do not consider tourism significant
Preventing thermal wastewater discharges to the river system (1/5)
Education & Training (1/5)
COMMERCIAL
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
COSTSEFFECTIVENESS
Parameter affected, valueInvestment Operational
3535OPTIMA
SERVICES
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
COSTSEFFECTIVENESS
Parameter affected, valueInvestment Operational
Enforcing financial investments for domestic water supply (2/5)
Results of QuestionairesQ4
3636OPTIMA
Overall Results
The results of both the individual questionnaires and the
group reports indicate the presence of 2 major problems
within the basin: water pollution and overexploitation
of water resources (i.e., water over-use)
3737OPTIMA
With respect to water pollution, the folllowing issues were considered significant and agreed upon by the stakeholders:
deficiencies in legislation regarding water pollution and water pollution control;
uncertainties in institutions’ enforcement capacities, responsibilities, contraints and scope;
significant needs for building of treatment plants at several points wastewater discharges;
problems related to operaional costs and O&M of existing treatment plants;
lack of public and water user awareness on basin water quality;
inefficient monitoring of water quality with respect to time frequencies and data reliability, which adversely affect water quality management practices and projections into the future.
Overall Results
3838OPTIMA
With respect to overexploitation of water resources (i.e., water over-use), the folllowing issues were considered significant and agreed upon by the stakeholders:
significant water losses in water conveyance systems of both the irrigation systems and the domestic water supply systems, which lead to increased water demand;
lack of public and water user awareness on overexpolitation of water and water scarcity;
inefficient and out-of-date irrigation systems and technologies, which lead to increased irrigation water demands;
lack of sufficient and reliable information on the amounts of water actually used by different sectors.
Overall Results
3939OPTIMA
39 stakeholders participated in the workshop on both days, and 41% of them
were women (16 out 39). The distribution of women with respect to working
groups and the institutions represented are given in following table.
GROUP I GROUP II
GROUP III GROUP IV GROUP V
DSI DSI DSI MoE Prov. Dir. IZSU
IZSU DSI IZSU MoE, Aegean Forestry
THAEM
THAEM MoE Prov. Dir.
MoE Prov. Dir. State Meteo. Org.
Chamber of Industry
Ministry of Agriculture
Gender Issues
4040OPTIMA
Gender Issues
The number of women in each category is:
State Meteo.Org.: Governmental Monitoring (1)
DSI : Governmental Planning (4)
İZSU : Municipality (3)
MoE Prov. Dir. : Governmental Monitoring (3)
THAEM : Governmental Research (2)
Chamber of Ind. : NGO (1)
Ministry of Agr. : Governmental Planning (1)
MoE, Forestry : Governmental Research (1)
4141OPTIMA
Gender Issues
Finally, the percentages of women participants with respect to management functions are:
Governmental – Planning : 31% (5/16)
Governmental – Monitoring : 25% (4/16)
Governmental – Research : 19% (3/16)
Municipality : 19% (3/16)
NGO : 6% (1/16)
4242OPTIMA
THANK YOU!