Post on 24-Jul-2016
description
transcript
Oscar DeLeon
Selected Works
Contents
Design Development
Sunset Park Los Angeles Ballet School
Chicago Union Station
Emerging Art Foundation: San Francisco
Berlin Central Station
4
8
12
16
20
24
EMERGING ART FOUNDATION
Nader NaimMatthew MombergerDaniel BerdichevskyOscar Deleon
N O M a DA R C H I T E C T S
Los Angeles, CA 90020(213) 613-2200
960 E. 3rd St.
CONSULTANTS:-Scott Uriu-Pavel Getov-Matthew Melnyk
Address:201 Post St. San Francisco, CA 94108
Owner: The City of San Francisco1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett PlaceSan Francisco, CA 94102
September 13, 2013
DESIGN DEVELOPMENTISSUE
DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE:
EMERGING ART FOUNDATION
PROJECT INFO
LOCATION: SAN FRANCISCO, CA HEIGHT: 214 FEETPROPERTY SIZE: 8,076 SFBUILDING SIZE: 53,673 SFPROGRAM: MUSEUM
4
Building ComponentsDesign DevelopmentProject Objective
This project investigates issues related to the implementation of design: technology, the use of materials, systems integration, and the archetypal analytical strategies of force, order, and character. The course includes a review of basic construction methods, analysis of building codes, design of structural and mechanical systems, development of building materials, and integration of building components and systems. Students develop a studio project from the previous semester, focusing on a detailed design of a single component of the building and the resolution of its structural system and building envelope as a whole. In collaboration with a group students the chosen project was developed further in its design.
EMERGING ART FOUNDATION
Nader NaimMatthew MombergerDaniel BerdichevskyOscar Deleon
N O M a DA R C H I T E C T S
Los Angeles, CA 90020(213) 613-2200
960 E. 3rd St.
CONSULTANTS:-Scott Uriu-Pavel Getov-Matthew Melnyk
Address:201 Post St. San Francisco, CA 94108
Owner: The City of San Francisco1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett PlaceSan Francisco, CA 94102
September 13, 2013
DESIGN DEVELOPMENTISSUE
DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE:
EMERGING ART FOUNDATION
PROJECT INFO
LOCATION: SAN FRANCISCO, CA HEIGHT: 214 FEETPROPERTY SIZE: 8,076 SFBUILDING SIZE: 53,673 SFPROGRAM: MUSEUM
5
PRIMARY STRUCTURE
PRIMARY STRUCTURE
GFRC PANELS
GFRC PANELSSUB-STRUCTURE
SUB-STRUCTURE
SUB-STRUCTURECONNECTORS
PANEL CONNECTORS
PANEL CONNECTORS
1 ENCLOSURE SYSTEMNTS
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
ABCDEFGH
SCALE:
EMERGING ART FOUNDATION
-Nader Naim-Matthew Momberger-Daniel Berdichevsky-Oscar Deleon
N O M a DA R C H I T E C T S
Los Angeles, CA 90020(213) 613-2200
960 E. 3rd St.
CONSULTANTS:
ARCHITECTS:
-Scott Uriu-Pavel Getov-Matthew Melnyk-Jamey T Lyzun
Address:201 Post St. San Francisco, CA 94108
Owner: The City of San Francisco1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett PlaceSan Francisco, CA 94102
October 28th, 2013
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
NOTES:
ISSUE:
DRAWN BY: NN/DB/MM/OD
DATE: DECEMBER 2, 2013
A4.1
ENCLOSURESYSTEM
PRIMARY STRUCTURE
PRIMARY STRUCTURE
GFRC PANELS
GFRC PANELSSUB-STRUCTURE
SUB-STRUCTURE
SUB-STRUCTURECONNECTORS
PANEL CONNECTORS
PANEL CONNECTORS
1 ENCLOSURE SYSTEMNTS
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
ABCDEFGH
SCALE:
EMERGING ART FOUNDATION
-Nader Naim-Matthew Momberger-Daniel Berdichevsky-Oscar Deleon
N O M a DA R C H I T E C T S
Los Angeles, CA 90020(213) 613-2200
960 E. 3rd St.
CONSULTANTS:
ARCHITECTS:
-Scott Uriu-Pavel Getov-Matthew Melnyk-Jamey T Lyzun
Address:201 Post St. San Francisco, CA 94108
Owner: The City of San Francisco1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett PlaceSan Francisco, CA 94102
October 28th, 2013
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
NOTES:
ISSUE:
DRAWN BY: NN/DB/MM/OD
DATE: DECEMBER 2, 2013
A4.1
ENCLOSURESYSTEM
PRIMARY STRUCTURE
PRIMARY STRUCTURE
GFRC PANELS
GFRC PANELSSUB-STRUCTURE
SUB-STRUCTURE
SUB-STRUCTURECONNECTORS
PANEL CONNECTORS
PANEL CONNECTORS
1 ENCLOSURE SYSTEMNTS
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
ABCDEFGH
SCALE:
EMERGING ART FOUNDATION
-Nader Naim-Matthew Momberger-Daniel Berdichevsky-Oscar Deleon
N O M a DA R C H I T E C T S
Los Angeles, CA 90020(213) 613-2200
960 E. 3rd St.
CONSULTANTS:
ARCHITECTS:
-Scott Uriu-Pavel Getov-Matthew Melnyk-Jamey T Lyzun
Address:201 Post St. San Francisco, CA 94108
Owner: The City of San Francisco1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett PlaceSan Francisco, CA 94102
October 28th, 2013
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
NOTES:
ISSUE:
DRAWN BY: NN/DB/MM/OD
DATE: DECEMBER 2, 2013
A4.1
ENCLOSURESYSTEM
EL + 23-0
EL + 68-0
EL + 48-6
EL + 81-0
EL + 99-6
EL + 133-6
EL + 147-6
EL + 160-6
EL + 189-0
EL + 0-0
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 5
LEVEL 6
LEVEL 8
LEVEL 10
LEVEL 11
LEVEL 12
GROUND LEVEL
1 FRONT ELEVATION1/8 = 1-0
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
ABCDEFGH
SCALE:
EMERGING ART FOUNDATION
-Nader Naim-Matthew Momberger-Daniel Berdichevsky-Oscar Deleon
N O M a DA R C H I T E C T S
Los Angeles, CA 90020(213) 613-2200
960 E. 3rd St.
CONSULTANTS:
ARCHITECTS:
-Scott Uriu-Pavel Getov-Matthew Melnyk-Jamey T Lyzun
Address:201 Post St. San Francisco, CA 94108
Owner: The City of San Francisco1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett PlaceSan Francisco, CA 94102
October 28th, 2013
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
NOTES:
ISSUE:
DRAWN BY: NN/DB/MM/OD
DATE: DECEMBER 2, 2013
A2.0
FRONTELEVATION
Enclosure System. The enclosure system consist of GFRC (glass fiber reinforced concrete) panels attached to steel wide-flange beams with panel connections. (Above)
Elevation. The elevation shows the per-forated system that creates a semi open interior.. (Left)
6
Appl
ied S
tudi
es, D
esig
n De
velo
pmen
t
1 TRANSVERSE SECTION
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
ABCDEFGH
SCALE:
EMERGING ART FOUNDATION
-Nader Naim-Matthew Momberger-Daniel Berdichevsky-Oscar Deleon
N O M a DA R C H I T E C T S
Los Angeles, CA 90020(213) 613-2200
960 E. 3rd St.
CONSULTANTS:
ARCHITECTS:
-Scott Uriu-Pavel Getov-Matthew Melnyk-Jamey T Lyzun
Address:201 Post St. San Francisco, CA 94108
Owner: The City of San Francisco1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett PlaceSan Francisco, CA 94102
October 28th, 2013
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
NOTES:
ISSUE:
DRAWN BY: NN/DB/MM/OD
DATE: DECEMBER 2, 2013
A2.10 10 20 60
3
A B C D E F G H
EL + 23-0
EL + 68-0
EL + 48-6
EL + 81-0
EL + 99-6
EL + 133-6
EL + 147-6
EL + 160-6
EL + 189-0
EL + 0-0
EL + 122-6
EL + 140-6
EL + -43-4
EL + -21-6
EL + -39-4
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 5
LEVEL 6
LEVEL 8
LEVEL 10
LEVEL 11
LEVEL 12
GROUND LEVEL
LEVEL 7
LEVEL 9
LEVEL -3
LEVEL -1
LEVEL -2
A-2.21
TRANSVERSESECTION
1 TRANSVERSE SECTION
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
ABCDEFGH
SCALE:
EMERGING ART FOUNDATION
-Nader Naim-Matthew Momberger-Daniel Berdichevsky-Oscar Deleon
N O M a DA R C H I T E C T S
Los Angeles, CA 90020(213) 613-2200
960 E. 3rd St.
CONSULTANTS:
ARCHITECTS:
-Scott Uriu-Pavel Getov-Matthew Melnyk-Jamey T Lyzun
Address:201 Post St. San Francisco, CA 94108
Owner: The City of San Francisco1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett PlaceSan Francisco, CA 94102
October 28th, 2013
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
NOTES:
ISSUE:
DRAWN BY: NN/DB/MM/OD
DATE: DECEMBER 2, 2013
A2.10 10 20 60
3
A B C D E F G H
EL + 23-0
EL + 68-0
EL + 48-6
EL + 81-0
EL + 99-6
EL + 133-6
EL + 147-6
EL + 160-6
EL + 189-0
EL + 0-0
EL + 122-6
EL + 140-6
EL + -43-4
EL + -21-6
EL + -39-4
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 5
LEVEL 6
LEVEL 8
LEVEL 10
LEVEL 11
LEVEL 12
GROUND LEVEL
LEVEL 7
LEVEL 9
LEVEL -3
LEVEL -1
LEVEL -2
A-2.21
TRANSVERSESECTION
Transverse Section. In section, the volumes are shown floating on the inside of the building; the inside also serving as an exterior condition.
7
Appl
ied S
tudi
es, D
esig
n De
velo
pmen
t
CORRUGATED STEEL DECKING
STEEL DECKING
GYP. CEILING PANELSC-CLIP
CEILING FURRING
HVAC VENT
HVAC VENT
STEEL WIRE HANGER
WIRE HANGER
CONCRETE FLOORING
RE-BAR
TEMPERED GLASS PANEL
WIDE FLANGE STEEL BEAM
WIDE FLANGE STEEL BEAM
ANGLE CONNECTION
BEAM CONNECTION
LIGHT STEEL FRAME
LIGHT STEEL FRAME
5/8 TYP. GYP. BD
5/8 TYP. GYP. BD
GYPROC WALLBOARD PANELS
FINISHED FLOOR
POURED CONCRETE
FLASHING
TEMPERED GLASS PANEL
1 BALCONY DETAILSNTS
CORRUGATED STEEL DECKING
STEEL DECKING
GYP. CEILING PANELSC-CLIP
CEILING FURRING
HVAC VENT
HVAC VENT
STEEL WIRE HANGER
WIRE HANGER
CONCRETE FLOORING
RE-BAR
TEMPERED GLASS PANEL
WIDE FLANGE STEEL BEAM
WIDE FLANGE STEEL BEAM
ANGLE CONNECTION
BEAM CONNECTION
LIGHT STEEL FRAME
LIGHT STEEL FRAME
5/8 TYP. GYP. BD
5/8 TYP. GYP. BD
GYPROC WALLBOARD PANELS
FINISHED FLOOR
POURED CONCRETE
FLASHING
TEMPERED GLASS PANEL
1 BALCONY DETAILSNTS
Balcony Detail. The balcony detailed serves as a cantilever floor in one of the museums gallery spaces. The detail also shows the construction in relation to the HVAC system component, the vent.
8
Appl
ied S
tudi
es, D
esig
n De
velo
pmen
t
PAVING SLABS
THERMAL INSULATION
WATERPROOFMEMBRANE
PEDESTALSYSTEM
RE-BAR
CONCRETE RETAINING WALL
ACOUSTICALPANEL
ACOUSTICALPANEL
ISO CLIPS
ISO CLIPS
ACOUSTICALMINERAL WOOL
AIR GAP
ACOUSTICALMINERAL WOOL
CORRUGATED STEEL DECKING
CORRUGATED STEEL DECKING
HVAC VENTTRUSS
STEEL WIRE HANGER
STEEL WIRE HANGER
STEEL BEAM
PAVING SLABSTHERMAL INSULATION
WATERPROOFMEMBRANE
HVAC VENT
STEEL BEAM
5/8 TYP. GYP. BD
5/8 TYP. GYP. BD
5/8 TYP. GYP. BD
5/8 TYP. GYP. BD
SOUNDPROOFING MAT
SOUNDPROOFING MAT
RE-BAR
1 CEILING DETAILSNTS
PAVING SLABS
THERMAL INSULATION
WATERPROOFMEMBRANE
PEDESTALSYSTEM
RE-BAR
CONCRETE RETAINING WALL
ACOUSTICALPANEL
ACOUSTICALPANEL
ISO CLIPS
ISO CLIPS
ACOUSTICALMINERAL WOOL
AIR GAP
ACOUSTICALMINERAL WOOL
CORRUGATED STEEL DECKING
CORRUGATED STEEL DECKING
HVAC VENTTRUSS
STEEL WIRE HANGER
STEEL WIRE HANGER
STEEL BEAM
PAVING SLABSTHERMAL INSULATION
WATERPROOFMEMBRANE
HVAC VENT
STEEL BEAM
5/8 TYP. GYP. BD
5/8 TYP. GYP. BD
5/8 TYP. GYP. BD
5/8 TYP. GYP. BD
SOUNDPROOFING MAT
SOUNDPROOFING MAT
RE-BAR
1 CEILING DETAILSNTS
Wall/Ceiling Details. The two images, one rendered the other digitally drawn, details conditions found in exterior courtyard found below grade level, which also connects to the retaining wall while also serving as ceiling for the underground theater.
9
Appl
ied S
tudi
es, D
esig
n De
velo
pmen
t
10
Landscape Investigation Sunset ParkThrough a re-consideration of current site and contextual conditions, the goal is to re-stratigize, re-envision, and design a new urban park that derives from dynamic (movement) and static (stationary) systems that create a new urban landscape join-ing the contextual flows and counter flows of the idle site. This landscape may be considered a place of passage or stasis, a place to slip in and out of or as a place to momentarily recede and re-emerge into the fabric of the city. After re-consideration of the current site and contextual conditions, the goal was to place a building in the landscape that reaffirms the contextual idea of the park. The building is then to compliment the park by either embedding itself or simply arrange itself in a contribu-tive manner.
11
AA
B
B
Park Plan. Along with landscape forms, the plan also displays topographical and material condi-tions.
12
Stud
io, L
ands
cape
Inve
stig
ation
, Ope
ratio
ns 1
AUDITORIUMCLASSROOM
LOBBY
Transverse Section. The section displays the relationship between the classroom and the indoor performance space. (Bottom)
Render. The render displays the layering of con-crete walls, steel trusses, and zinc cladded roof.
13
Stud
io, L
ands
cape
Inve
stig
ation
, Ope
ratio
ns 1
AA
B
B
Plan. The building is intended to be used as a performance area for the surrounding community. The plan shows a stage that opens to the exterior for performance purposes. (top)
Model. An image of the proposed design for the building to be included in the park. The model was at 1-0= 1/16 scale.
14
Stud
io, L
ands
cape
Inve
stig
ation
, Ope
ratio
ns 1
Roof. The image of the physical model focused on the buildings roof design. The roof design is intended to parallel and continue the flow of the angular shapes found throughout the entire park (Top)
Movement. The flow of movement is interrupted at certain instances in order engage pedestrians with the performance spaces. (Right)
15
Stud
io, L
ands
cape
Inve
stig
ation
, Ope
ratio
ns 1
Stud
io, T
rans
form
atio
nal M
orph
olog
ies
16
Stud
io, T
rans
form
atio
nal M
orph
olog
ies
The project explores programming as a means of generating organization models and conceptual narratives that shift basic morphologies into new spatial realms. Pri-mary to this study is an investigation into the gradient of space between architectural form and cultural action. Cultural action should be understood as the flows of people and the distribution of functional uses. In exploring the role of programming in archi-tecture, the studio proposes formal organizations and their corresponding material form for the Los Angeles Ballet School in Hollywood, California.
Morphologies: ProgramsLos Angeles Ballet School
Section A Render. The render displays the performance hall in the interior and the use of its underside for the exterior theater. A central void allows a buffer zone between private and public spaces.
Stud
io, T
rans
form
atio
nal M
orph
olog
ies
Section A Render. The render displays the performance hall in the interior and the use of its underside for the exterior theater. A central void allows a buffer zone between private and public spaces.
17
Stud
io, T
rans
form
atio
nal M
orph
olog
ies
Physical Model. The interior model gives a good sense of the feel of the spaces and indications of how movement works within the building. Strongly apparent, is the cradling of the dance studio by the performance hall.
18
Stud
io, T
rans
form
atio
nal M
orph
olog
ies
Plan @ 30
A
A
B B
5
13
13
14
13
Ground Level Render. The render displays a street level view, from Sunset Ave. (left)
Third Level. The third level is where the two major dance studios for the ballet school are locate. The dance studios along with the performance hall are the pinnacle of the project. The performance hall cradles the dance studio, as it hovers above, as a symbolic gesture of the vitality of the dance school. (top)
19
Stud
io, T
rans
form
atio
nal M
orph
olog
ies
Plan @ 4
A
A
B B
15156
7
1
2
3
56
Plan @ 16
A
A
B B
5
8
99
9
10
12
11
VIEWING(MORE PUBLIC)
EDUCATIONAL(MORE PRIVATE)
Viewing vs Educational. The program is initially organized in two u-shaped interlocking volumes. The volumes are designated as viewing areas and educational areas. The viewing areas deal with the performance elements of the building, which are the more public spaces; and the educational areas deal with the school elements of the building, which are more private areas. (top right)
20
Floor Plans. The program in the floor plans is meant to seperate the more public areas from the more private.
1. Lobby2. Performance Hall3. Backstage4. Black box Theater5. Juice Bar6. Changing Room7. Green Room 8. Library9. Classroom10. Multi-Purpose11. Gym12. Tech. Lab13. Dance Studio14. Administration15. Rest room
21
Physical Model. The interior and skin model were built to come together as one whole model which would fit into the site model for a physical sense of the building in relation to its context. (right)
22
Stud
io, S
tatic
Arc
hitec
tura
l Sys
tem
s
The project locates the idea of architecture at the intersection of various systems of information: from technical to cultural, from visual to tactile. The project examines the impact of structure and material systems on site and building form, and the capacity to use transformation as a methodological tool to guide a rigorous approach to decision making.The project proposes the design of new enlarged infrastructural node for high speed rail at Union Station in Chicago. Motivated by the rich structural and tectonic history of the train station, the proposal explores the relationships between structural morphology, urban movement, environmental forces, and other performative criteria.The focus is that of structural systems, performative envelopes, program and flow analysis, and the development of spatial conditions that create compelling public experience.
Static SystemsChicago Union Station
Render. The render depicts the view of the build-ing from street perspective.
23
Stud
io, S
tatic
Arc
hitec
tura
l Sys
tem
s
Site . The site is located in the heart of downtown Chicago and adjacent to the Chicago River.
24
Stud
io, S
tatic
Arc
hitec
tura
l Sys
tem
s
Section A Scale: 1/16= 1-0
Section A. The section runs north-south showing the possibility of occupiable volumes.
25
Stud
io, S
tatic
Arc
hitec
tura
l Sys
tem
s
Existing Structure
Structural System
Enclosure system
Axon. The exploded axonometric shows the basic putting together of the structural facade system. (Top Left)
Model. The close up photo of the model shows the clustering of volumes and their embedded structure. (Top)
Render. The render looking up at the volumes shows the intensity caused by the fusion of volumes and structure creating very conceptual images. (Left)
26
Studio, Static Architectural Systems
Section B Scale: 1/16= 1-0
Section B. The section runs east-west show-ing the burrowing of the structural facade into the existing building making a central core.
27
Stud
io, S
tatic
Arc
hitec
tura
l Sys
tem
s
28
Stud
io,D
ynam
ic Ar
chite
ctur
al Sy
stem
s
The Emerging Art Foundation San Francisco is a center for contemporary art that offers young artists a chance to debut, and incorporate their work into its collection. At once a creative space for artists and a place where art and the general public can meet, the Emerging Art Foundation San Francisco, is dedicated to promoting and raising public awareness of contemporary art. As a reflection of our times, the Emerging Art Foundation embraces all creative fields and genres of contemporary art, ranging from design to photography, from painting to video art and from fashion to performance art. This testifies to the Emerging Art Foundations commitment and skill, to its blend of rigor and eclecticism which opens up contemporary art and ren-ders it more accessible.
This is accomplished through the development of a design from conceptions to large-scale detail with an emphasis on assimilation of building systems. The design shows comprehensive building program and site through the development of programmed spaces, structural systems, building envelope and design methodology. The method-ology being the concept of revealing. In other words, delamination of the exterior to reaveal the interior as a signal to the importance of the substance on the interior.
Dynamic SystemsThe Emerging Art Foundation: San Francisco
Site. The site is located in a very and active part of San Francisco where everything from shop-ping centers to hotels are located.
29
Stud
io,D
ynam
ic Ar
chite
ctur
al Sy
stem
s
Model. Up close photo of the physical model shows structural details, such as beans, col-umns, and layering of materials. (right)
Render. The interoir volumes serve as galler-ies that include perforations facing the open exterior for lighting purposes. (right)
30
Stud
io,D
ynam
ic Ar
chite
ctur
al Sy
stem
s
Section. The section is detailed in order to give information about the structural response to the design.
Section. The section is detailed in order to give information about the structural response to the design.
Model. Up close photo of the physical model shows structural details, such as beans, columns, and layering of materials. (Right, opposite page)
Program. The diagrams show the intention of three dominant to house art galleries. (Left, op-posite page)
31
Stud
io,D
ynam
ic Ar
chite
ctur
al Sy
stem
s
Gallery Gallery
Gallery
Gallery
Museum ShopLobby/ Ticket
Oce
Media Center
Gallery Gallery
Gallery
Gallery
Museum ShopLobby/ Ticket
Oce
Media Center
Gallery Gallery
Gallery
Gallery
Museum ShopLobby/ Ticket
Oce
Media Center
Gallery Gallery
Gallery
Gallery
Museum ShopLobby/ Ticket
Oce
Media Center
Plans. The volumes and the delaminated surfaces have a great effect on the plans.
32
Stud
io,D
ynam
ic Ar
chite
ctur
al Sy
stem
s
Render. A photomontage of the street view of the building.
33
Stud
io,D
ynam
ic Ar
chite
ctur
al Sy
stem
s
34
Diagram. Site information was extracted and interpreted as vectors, which were deployed as a tool to shape the architecture.
The project looks at the effect of line on form. In this case, the lines utilized are both physical, as in the train tracks, and suggestive, as in the suggestive lines found in the site as information. The intention is to take into consideration both physical and sug-gestive lines, to create a more prevalent relationship between the train station and the tracks themselves.Taking into consideration the traditional lack of relationship between train station and the train, vectoral information is deployed as a way to shape and organize a station with the intention of creating a relationship. In this specific case, an alternativedesign to the Berlin Central Station, located near the civic center in Tiergarten.In this case, specifically, lines where extracted from various conditions in the site as vectoral information. Given existing conditions in the site are readily available as a source of information, given information from the site conditions were extracted and utilized as a tool to create form. As for the correlation between line and form, in a more physical sense, the tracks have a morevisual impact.
Vectoral DeploymentBerlin Central Station
Vect
oral
Depl
oym
ent:
Belrin
Cen
tral S
tatio
n
35
Site. The site is located near the civic center in Tiergarten. (top)
Model. Sectional model showing series of sectional conditions. Materials used include: museum board, styrene, acrylic, and 3D printed powder. (bottom)
Vect
oral
Depl
oym
ent:
Belrin
Cen
tral S
tatio
n
36
Diagram. Lines where extracted from various conditions in the site as vectors and utilized as a tool to create form. (top)
Vect
oral
Depl
oym
ent:
Belrin
Cen
tral S
tatio
n
37
Sections. Transeverse and longitudinal section drawings showing the variety in spaces. (top)
Vect
oral
Depl
oym
ent:
Belrin
Cen
tral S
tatio
n
38
39
Sections. Transeverse and longitudinal section drawings showing the variety in spaces. (top)
56
57
Oscar DeLeon
Selected Works58