Post on 25-Jun-2015
description
transcript
Overview of Utah Cancer Screening and Staging
April 28, 2011
Produced by the Data Acquisition, Utilization, and Management Team
BREAST CANCER SCREENING MAMMOGRAM
Table 1. Current Mammography Trends
Year Utah US
2006 67.81% 76.14%
2007 67.29% 76.10%
2008 67.20% 76.22%
2010 66.36% NA
Source: BRFSS
BREAST CANCER SCREENING Mammography in the past 2 years
Utah Women 40+
201066.4%
Target81.1%
AgeYes
Race/EthnicityNo
GeographyNo
InsuranceYes
SexN/A
EducationYes
Significant Difference?
Data Source: 2010 BRFSS
55.72
71.92 73.05
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
40‐49 50‐64 65+
Mam
mog
raph
y Pe
rcen
tage
Figure 1. Mammography within the Past Two Years, Women Ages 40 and Older, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate66.36%
65.24 63.2757.66
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Non‐Hispanic White Hispanic Other
Mam
mog
raph
y Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 2. Mammography within the Past Two Years*, Women Ages 40 and Older, by Race/Ethnicity, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate66.36%
66.79 66.5260.91
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Urban Rural Frontier
Mam
mog
raph
y Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 3. Mammography within the Past Two Years*, Women Ages 40 and Older, by Geographic Area, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate66.36%
68.46
49.44
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Yes No
Mam
mograph
y Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 4. Mammography within the Past Two Years*, Utah Women Ages 40 and Older, by Insurance Status, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate66.36%
48.9
66.37 65.8169.77
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
<HS HS/GED HS+ College
Mam
mog
raph
y Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 5. Mammography within the Past Two Years*, Women 40 and Older, by Education, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate66.36%
Table 2. Mammography for Women Ages 40 Years and Older by Health Insurance Type
2007 2008 2009
Commercial HMO State Average 58.90% 59.76% 59.62%
Commercial HMO National Average 69.10% 69.90% 70.48%
Medicaid HMO State Average 49.20% 51.39% 50.80%
Medicaid HMO National Average 49.83% 50.70% 52.31%
Source: Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS)
89.4
51.1
9.6 1.5
106.3
52.4
10.6 3.60
20
40
60
80
100
120
Localized Regional Distant Unstaged
Breast Can
cer Incide
nce pe
r 100,000 Females
*Rates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence
Figure 6. Breast Cancer Incidence in Women Ages 20 Years and Older*, by Stage, Utah vs. U.S. 2003‐2007
Utah
U.S.
CERVICAL CANCER SCREENINGPAP TEST
Table 3. Current Pap Test Trends
Year Utah US
2006 79.03% 84.85%
2007 75.11% 83.49%
2008 74.11% 82.24%
2010 73.95% NA
Source: BRFSS
CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING Pap Test in the past 3 years
Utah Women 18+
201074.0%
Target93.0%
AgeYes
Race/EthnicityYes
GeographyYes
InsuranceYes
SexN/A
EducationNo
Significant Difference?
Data Source: 2010 BRFSS
67.31
84.09 81.42
57.75
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
18‐34 35‐49 50‐64 65+
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
Figure 7. Pap Test within the Past Three Years, Utah Women Ages 18 Years and Older, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate73.95%
73.7382.81
75.76
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Non‐Hispanic White Hispanic Other
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 8. Pap Test within the Past Three Years*, Utah Women Ages 18 Years and Older, by Race/Ethnicity, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate73.95%
75.43
69.3570.79
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
Urban Rural Frontier
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 9. Pap Test within the Past Three Years*, Utah Women Ages 18 Years and Older, by Geographic Area, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate73.95%
75.4264.15
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Yes No
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 10. Pap Test within the Past Three Years*, Utah Women Ages 18 Years and Older, by Insurance Status, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate73.95%
71.87 76.74 77.2982.83
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
<HS HS/GED HS+ College
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 11. Pap Test within the Past Three Years*, Utah Women Ages 18 Years and Older, by Education, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate73.95%
Table 4. Pap Test for Women Ages 21 to 80 Years by Health Insurance Type
2007 2008 2009
Commercial HMO State Average 79.00% 78.39% 73.28%
Commercial HMO National Average 81.70% 81.34% 77.27%
Medicaid HMO State Average 60.87% 58.45% 66.26%
Medicaid HMO National Average 64.75% 65.91% 65.65%
Source: Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS)
3.83.1
0.7 0.1
5.5
4.2
1.20.6
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Localized Regional Distant Unstaged
Cervical Can
cer Incide
nce pe
r 100,000 Females
*Rates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence
Figure 12. Cervical Cancer Incidence in Women Ages 20 Years and Older*, by Stage, Utah vs. U.S. 2003‐2007
Utah
U.S.
SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL CANCER
Table 5. Current Colorectal Cancer Screening Trends
Year Utah US
2004 57.70% 57.32%
2006 61.50% 61.26%
2008 66.80% 64.61%
2010 68.80% NA
Source: BRFSS
COLON CANCER SCREENING Either an FOBT in the past year or a
Sigmoidoscopy/Colonoscopy within the past 10 years Utah Adults 50+
201068.8%
Target80.0%
AgeYes
Race/EthnicityYes
GeographyYes
InsuranceYes
SexNo
EducationYes
Significant Difference?
Data Source: 2010 BRFSS
63.24
75.99
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
50‐64 65+
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Either a fecal occult blood test within the past year or sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy in the past 10 years.
Figure 13. Colorectal Cancer Screening* Among Utah Adults 50 and Older by Age, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate68.8%
69.84
67.83
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
Male Female
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Either a fecal occult blood test within the past year or sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy in the past 10 years. Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 14. Colorectal Cancer Screening* Among Utah Adults 50 and Older by Sex, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate68.8%
69.38
52.71 56.19
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Non‐Hispanic White Hispanic Other
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Either a fecal occult blood test within the past year or sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy in the past 10 years. Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 15. Colorectal Cancer Screening* Among Utah Adults 50 and Older by Race/Ethnicity, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate68.8%
70.84 67.9756.36
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Urban Rural Frontier
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Either a fecal occult blood test within the past year or sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy in the past 10 years. Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 16. Colorectal Cancer Screening* Among Utah Adults 50 and Older by Geographic Area, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate68.8%
70.63
48.29
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Yes No
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Either a fecal occult blood test within the past year or sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy in the past 10 years. Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 17. Colorectal Cancer Screening* Among Utah Adults 50 and Older by Insurance Status, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate68.8%
43.32
65.11 66.7376.55
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
<HS HS/GED HS+ College
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Either a fecal occult blood test within the past year or sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy in the past 10 years. Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 18. Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Utah Adults 50 and Older*, by Education, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate68.8%
Table 6. Colorectal Cancer Screening for Utah Adults Aged 51 to 80 Years by Health Insurance Type
2007 2008 2009
Commercial HMO State Average 55.80% 55.01% 59.16%
Commercial HMO National Average 55.60% 59.08% 60.32%
Medicaid HMO State Average Not Available Not Available Not Available
Medicaid HMO National Average Not Available Not Available Not Available
Source: Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS)
25.6
16.2
9
1.8
27.9
23.1
12.8
3.80
5
10
15
20
25
30
Localized Regional Distant Unstaged
Colon Ca
ncer In
cide
nce pe
r 100,000 Po
pulation
*Rates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence
Figure 19. Colon Cancer Incidence in Adults Ages 20 Years and Older*, by Stage, Utah vs. U.S. 2003‐2007
Utah
U.S.
Figure 20. Colon Cancer Incidence by Stage, Utah vs. US, 2003‐2007
Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Distant41.3%
Unstaged34.2%
Localized18.9%
Regional5.6%
US
Distant48.7%
Unstaged30.8%
Localized17.1%
Regional3.4%
Utah
Figure 21. Male Colon Cancer Incidence by Stage, Utah vs. US, 2003‐2007
Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Distant17.0%
Unstaged3.0%
Localized50.7%
Regional29.2%
Utah
Distant18.8%
Unstaged5.7%
Localized42.1%
Regional33.4%
US
Figure 22. Female Colon Cancer Incidence by Stage*, Utah vs. US, 2003‐2007
Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Distant17.4%
Unstaged3.8%
Localized46.3%
Regional32.5%
Utah
Distant18.9%
Unstaged5.8%
Localized40.5%
Regional34.9%
US
SCREENING FOR PROSTATE CANCER
Table 7. Current Prostate Cancer Screening Trends
Year Utah US
2004 58.16% 61.28%
2006 60.12% 61.76%
2008 60.71% 64.02%
2010 62.50% NA
Source: BRFSS
PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING Utah Men 40+ Who have ever had a PSA
201062.5%
TargetUnknown
AgeYes
Race/EthnicityYes
GeographyNo
InsuranceYes
SexN/A
EducationYes
Significant Difference?
Data Source: 2010 BRFSS
32.8
72.47
87.97
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
40‐49 50‐64 65+
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
Figure 23. Utah Males Ages 40 and Older who Ever had a PSA, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate62.5%
58.74
39.36
54.51
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Non‐Hispanic White Hispanic Other
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 24. PSA Among Utah Males Ages 40 and Older*, by Ethnicity/Race, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate62.5%
63.75 60.77 59.09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Urban Rural Frontier
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 25. PSA Among Utah Males Ages 40 and Older*, by Geographic Area, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate62.5%
64.46
47.73
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Yes No
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 26. PSA Among Utah Males Ages 40 and Older*, by Insurance Status, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate62.5%
41.4
57.7963.62 66.75
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
< High School High School Graduate or GED Some Post High School College Graduate
Screen
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 27. PSA Among Utah Males Ages 40 and Over*, by Education,BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate62.5%
239.1
7.5 4
199.1
9.8 10.30
50
100
150
200
250
300
Localized/regional (Prostate cases) Distant Unstaged
Prostate Can
cer Incide
nce pe
r 100,000 Males
*Rates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence
Figure 28. Prostate Cancer Incidence in Men Ages 20 Years and Older*, by Stage, Utah vs. U.S. 2003‐2007
Utah
U.S.
SMOKING AS AN INDICATOR FOR LUNG CANCER
Table 8. Current Cigarette Smoking Trends
Year Utah US
2007 11.21% 19.56%
2008 9.11% 18.57%
2009 9.47% 18.26%
2010 8.81% NA
Source: BRFSS
CIGARETTE SMOKING Current Cigarette Smokers
Utah Adults 18+
20108.8%
Target9.5%
AgeYes
Race/EthnicityYes
GeographyYes
InsuranceYes
SexYes
EducationYes
Significant Difference?
Data Source: 2010 BRFSS
10.68
8.69.76
4.59
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
18‐34 35‐49 50‐64 65+
Smok
ing Pe
rcen
tage
Figure 29. Cigarette Smoking by Age Among Utah Adults, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate8.81%
10.11
7.48
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
Male Female
Smok
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 30. Cigarette Smoking Among Utah Adults* by Sex, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate8.81%
8.749.83
13.77
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Non‐Hispanic White Hispanic Other
Smok
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 31. Cigarette Smoking Among Utah Adults* by Ethnicity/Race BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate8.81%
8.527.56
15.07
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Urban Rural Frontier
Smok
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 32. Cigarette Smoking Among Utah Adults* by Geographic AreaBRFSS 2010
2010 Rate8.81%
7.22
16.38
0
5
10
15
20
25
Yes No
Smok
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 33. Cigarette Smoking Among Utah Adults* by Insurance Status,BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate8.81%
25.92
16.12
7.312.18
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
< High School High School Graduate or GED
Some Post High School College Graduate
Smok
ing Pe
rcen
tage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 34. Cigarette Smoking Among Utah Adults* by Education, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate8.81%
5.34%6.13%
8.50%
10.35%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
9th grade 10th grade 11th grade 12th grade
Figure 35. Current Youth Cigarette Use by School Grade, Utah, YRBS 2003, 2005, 2007
2010 Rate8.81%
6.8 9
22.4
2.5
16.320.4
45.1
7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Localized Regional Distant Unstaged
Lung
Can
cer Incide
nce pe
r 100,000 Po
pulation
*Rates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence
Figure 36. Lung Cancer Incidence in Adults Ages 20 and Older*, by Stage, Utah vs. U.S. 2003‐2007
Utah
U.S.
Figure 37. Lung Cancer Incidence by Stage, Utah vs. US*, 2003‐2007
Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Localized16.7%
Regional22.1%
Distant55.0%
Unstaged6.1%
Utah
Localized18.4%
Regional23.0%
Distant50.8%
Unstaged7.9%
US
Figure 38. Male Lung Cancer Incidence by Stage, Utah vs. US*, 2003‐2007
Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Localized20.6%
Regional22.7%
Distant50.6%
Unstaged6.1%
Utah
Localized16.8%
Regional23.0%
Distant52.1%
Unstaged8.1%
US
Figure 39. Female Lung Cancer Incidence by Stage, Utah vs. US*, 2003‐2007
Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Localized20.6%
Regional22.7%
Distant50.6%
Unstaged6.1%
Utah
Localized20.3%
Regional22.7%
Distant49.3%
Unstaged7.8%
US
SUN SAFETY AS AN INDICATOR FOR MELANOMA
Table 9. Current Sun Safety Trends
Year Utah US
2007 65.90% NA
2008 64.85% NA
2009 65.60% NA
2010 65.04% NA
Source: BRFSS
SUN SAFETYSun Safety PracticesUtah Adults 18+
201065.0%
Target 201580.1%
AgeYes
Race/EthnicityNo
GeographyNo
InsuranceNo
SexNo
EducationNo
Significant Difference?
Data Source: 2010 BRFSS
54.62
69.32 68.25
77.54
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
18‐34 35‐49 50‐64 65+
Sun Safety Percentage
Figure 40. Sun Safety Practices Among Utah Adults by Age, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate65.04%
62.87
67.91
58
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
Male Female
Sun Safety Percentage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 41. Sun Safety Practices Among Utah Adults* by Sex, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate65.04%
65.06 68.37 67.67
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Non‐Hispanic White Hispanic Other
Sun Safety Percentage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 42. Sun Safety Practices Among Utah Adults* by Ethnicity/Race, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate65.04%
65.32 65.15 64.53
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Urban Rural Frontier
Sun Safety Percentage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 43. Sun Safety Practices Among Utah Adults* by Geographic Area, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate65.04%
64.89 64.51
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Yes No
Sun Safety Percentage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 44. Sun Safety Practices Among Utah Adults* by Health Insurance Status, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate65.04%
66.97 64.9570.82 70.67
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
< High School High School Graduate or GED
Some Post High School College Graduate
Sun Safety Percentage
*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Figure 45. Sun Safety Practices Among Utah Adults* by Education, BRFSS 2010
2010 Rate65.04%
31
4.3 1.4 0.6
23
2.6 1.1 10
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Localized Regional Distant Unstaged
Melan
oma incide
nce pe
r 100,000 Po
pulation
*Rates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence
Figure 46. Melanoma Incidence in Adults Ages 20 and Older*, by Stage, Utah vs. U.S. 2003‐2007
Utah
U.S.
Figure 47. Melanoma Incidence by Stage, Utah vs. US*, 2003‐2007
Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Localized83.1%
Regional11.5%
Distant3.8%
Unstaged1.6%
Utah
Localized81.4%
Regional10.5%
Distant4.5%
Unstaged3.7%
US
Figure 48. Melanoma Incidence in Non‐Hispanic Whites by Stage, Utah vs. US*, 2003‐2007
Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Localized83.4%
Regional11.2%
Distant3.7%
Unstaged1.7%
Utah
Localized83.6%
Regional9.2%
Distant3.7%
Unstaged3.4%
US
Figure 49. Melanoma Incidence in Hispanics by Stage, Utah vs. US*, 2003‐2007
Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Localized60.2%
Regional30.7%
Distant4.5%
Unstaged4.5%
Utah
Localized70.5%
Regional16.4%
Distant8.2%
Unstaged4.9%
US
Figure 50. Melanoma Incidence in Other Races by Stage, Utah vs. US*, 2003‐2007
Source: Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence*Estimates are age‐adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Localized84.6%
Regional15.4%
Distant0.0% Unstaged
0.0%
Utah
Localized86.3%
Regional6.3%
Distant2.5%
Unstaged5.0%
US
Wrap Up
• Future reports
• Comments
• Questions
Data Acquisition, Utilization, and Management Team Members
• Meghan Balough
• Banning Leonard
• Kathie Marti
• Antoinette Stroup
• Shelly Wagstaff
Utah Cancer Registry Acknowledgement
• Research was supported by the Utah Cancer Registry, which is funded by Contract No. HHSN261201000026C from the National Cancer Institute's SEER Program with additional support from the Utah State Department of Health and the University of Utah.