Post on 12-Jun-2018
transcript
f>*—I i
0«
,« a _*. •• I
M W o x g
"1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Owen T. Mascott, Esq. (State Bar No. 134243)675 Ygnacio Valley Rd., Suite B213Walnut Creek, CA 94596Telephone: (925) 935-5005
Attorney for Plaintiff RepDefense Solutions, Inc.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
RepDefense Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff,
vs.
Demoin Strornan IE
Defendants.
Case No. C16-OQ2Q5
UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE
STIPULATION FOR FINAL JUDGMENTAND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
PARTIES
This Stipulation for Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction ("Stipulation") is entered
into by and between Plaintiff RepDefense Solutions, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Demoin
Stroman III ("Defendant"). Plaintiff and Defendant collectively referred to herein as the "Parties."
The Parties hereby stipulate that:
1. This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter hereof and of the Parties to this
Stipulation;
2. Defendant received a copy of the Summons and Complaint at his residence and by
hand delivery on February 3, 2016 and that pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 415.20(b) was
properly served with notice of this action;
Defendant unlawfully published statements about Plaintiff on the Internet, which
are false, defamatory, and constitute libel per se, and that his doing so was wanton, willful, and
STIPULATION FOR FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
o
o vo
£ 5 U >A
^— 1> V>
12
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
malicious;
4. Defendant agrees to him being enjoined from further false publications regarding
Plaintiff, and in taking the necessary actions to remove his past false statements from the Internet;
5. The attached Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction (the "Judgment") may be
entered by any judge of the Contra Costa County Superior Court and should be entered by the
Court in furtherance of this Stipulation;
6. The Parties hereby waive their right to move for a new trial or otherwise seek to
set aside the Judgment through any collateral attack, and further waive their right to appeal from
the Judgment, except that the Parties both agree that this Court shall retain jurisdiction for the
enforcement of, compliance with, or punishment of violations of the Judgment attached herewith;
7. Defendant will accept service of any Notice of Entry of Judgment entered in this
action by delivery of such notice via regular mail to his residence; and
8. Each party is to bear their own costs and attorney's fees.
IT IS SO STIPULATED
Dated: February 04- ,2016
By:Owen T. Mascott, Esq. (State Bar No. 134243)675 Ygnacio Valley Rd., Suite B213Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Dated: February L/T ,2016
Demoin Stroman III
2STIPULATION FOR FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
SUPERIOR COURT - MAR'i- TEZ
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
MARTINEZ, CA, 94553
REPDEFENSE VS. STROMAN
NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CIVMSC16-00205
1. NOTICE: THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR:
DATE : 06/21/16 DEPT: 09 TIME: 9 : 00
THIS FORM, A COPY OF THE NOTICE TO PLAINTIFFS, THE ADR INFORMATION
SHEET, A BLANK CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE, AND A BLANK
STIPULATION FORM ARE TO BE SERVED ON OPPOSING PARTIES. ALL PARTIES
SERVED WITH SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT/CROSS-COMPLAINT OR THEIR ATTORNEY
OF RECORD MUST APPEAR.
2. You may stipulate to an earlier Case Management Conference. Ifall parties agree to an early Case Management Conference, pleasecontact the Court Clerk's Office at (925)646-4099 for Unlimited Civiland Limited Civil cases for assignment of an earlier date.
3. You must be familiar with the case and be fully prepared to par-ticipate effectively in the Case Management Conference and to discussthe suitability of this case for the EASE Program, private mediation,binding or non-binding arbitration, and/or use of a Special Master.
4. At any Case Management Conference the court may make pretrialorders including the following:
establishing a discovery schedulereferring the case to arbitrationtransferring the case to limited jurisdictiondismissing fictitious defendantsscheduling exchange of expert witness informationsetting subsequent conference and the trial dateconsolidating casessevering trial of cross-complaints or bifurcating
determining when demurrers and motions will be filed
a .b.c .d.e .f .g-h.
anananananananan
orderorderorderorderorderorderorderorder
issuesi . an order
SANCTIONS
If you do not file the Case Management Conference Questionnaire orattend the Case Management Conference or participate effectively inthe Conference, the court may impose sanctions (including dismissal ofthe case and payment of money).
Clerk of the Superior Court of Contra Costa CountyI declare under penalty of perjury that I am not a p/arty to thisaction, and that I delivered or mailed a copy of thZs notice to theperson representing the
Dated: 02/02/16
D. WEBERDeputy Clerk of the Court
M-100
SUMMONS(CITACION JUDICIAL)
NOTICE TO DEFENDANT:(AVISO AL DEM AND ADO):
Demoin Stroman ni
YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF:(LO ESTA DEMANDANDO EL DEMANDANTE):
RepDefense Solutions, Inc.
NOTICE! You have been sued. The court may decide against you without your being heard unless you respond within 30 days. Read the informationbelow.
You have 30 CALENDAR DAYS after this summons and legal papers are served on you to file a written response at this court and have a copyserved on the plaintiff. A letter or phone call will not protect you. Your written response must be in proper legal form if you want the court to hear yourcase. There may be a court form that you can use for your response. You can find these court forms and more information at the California CourtsOnline Self-Help Center (www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp), your county law library, or the courthouse nearest you. If you cannot pay the filing fee, askthe court clerk for a fee waiver form. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose trie case by default, and your wages, money, and propertymay be taken without further warning from the court.
There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may want to call an attorneyreferral service. If you cannot afford an attorney, you may be eligible for free legal services from a nonprofit legal services program. You can locatethese nonprofit groups at the California Legal Services Web site (www.lawhelpcalifornia.org), the California Courts Online Self-Help Center(www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp), or by contacting your local court or county bar association. NOTE: The court has a statutory lien for waived fees andcosts on any settlement or arbitration award of $10,000 or more in a civil case. The court's lien must be paid before the court will dismiss the case.iAVISOI Lo han demandado. Si no responde dentro de 30 dlas, la corte puede decidir en su contra sin escuchar su version. Lea la information acontinuad6n.
Tiene 30 DlAS DE CALENDARIO despues de que le entreguen esta citacidn y papeles legates para presentar una respuesta por escrito en estacorte y hacer que se entregue una cop/a a/ demandante. Una carta o una llamada telefonica no to protegen. Su respuesta por escrito tiene que estaren formato legal correcto si desea que procesen su caso en la corte. Es posible que haya un formulario que listed pueda usarpara su respuesta.Puede encontrar estos formularios de la corte ymas information en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California (www.sucorte.ca.govj, en labiblioteca de leyes de su condado o en la corte que le quede mas cerca. S! no puede pagar la cuota de presentation, pida al secretario de la corteque le de un formulario de exention de pago de cuotas. Si no presenta su respuesta a tiempo, puede perder el caso por incumplimlento y la corte lepodra guitar su sue/do, dinero y bienes sin mas advertencia.
Hay otros requisites legates. Es recomendab/e que llame a un abogado inmediatamente. Si no conoce a un abogado, puede tlamar a un servicio deremision a abogados. Si no puede pagar a un abogado, es posible que cumpla con los requisites para obtener servicios legates gratuitos de unprograms de servicios legates sin fines de lucro. Puede encontrar estos grupos sin fines de lucro en el sitio web de California Legal Services,(www.lawhelpcalifomia.org,), en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California, (www.sucorte.ca.goyj o poniendose en contacto con la corte o elcolegio de abogados locales. AVISO: Porley, la corte tiene derecho a reclamarlas cuotas y los costos exentos porimponer un gravamen sobrecualquier recuperation de $10,000 omasde valor recibida mediante un acuerdo o una concesiori de arbitraje en un caso de derecho civil. Tiene quepagar el gravamen de la corte antes de que la corte pueda desechar el caso.
CASE NUMBER:fNwierq del Caso):
The name and address of the court is:(El nombre y direcci6n de la corte es): Martinez Superior Court
725 Court StreetMartinez, CA 94553 T?VThe name, address, and telephone number of plaintiffs attorney, or plaintiff without an attorney, is: / ..••*-* -*•(El nombre, la direction y el niimero de telefono del abogado del demandante, o del demandante que no tiene abogado, es):
Owen T. Mascott, St Bar #134243, 675 Ygnacio Valley Rd, St B21 VWalajt Creek CA ,94596, 925-935-5005
W3BFRFEB 0 2 ?oi8DATE: r t -D!Jc/. j jD Clerk,b$r ^X" .Deputy(Fecha) (Secrkanot^L-^L^ (Adjunto)
(For proof of service of this summons, use Proof of Service of Summons (form POS-010).)(Para prueba de entrega de esta citatidn use el formulario Proof of Service of Summons, (POS-010)).
NOTICE TO THE PERSON SERVED: You are served1. Ly I as an individual defendant.2. | | as the person sued under the fictitious name of (specify):
[SEAL]
3. I. I on behalf of (specify):
under: [ZH CCP 416.10 (corporation) | 1I I CCP 416.20 (defunct corporation)I | CCP 416.40 (association or partnership) | |
I I other (specify):4. I I by personal delivery on (date):
CCP 416.60 (minor)CCP 416.70 (conservatee)CCP 416.90 (authorized person)
Form Adopted for Mandatory UseJudicial Council of CafifomiaSUM-100 [Rev. July 1.2009]
SUMMONS Code of Civil Procedure §§ 412.20, 465www. courtinfo.ca.gov
. (S
• .23 wO" — <°
.
r *"H r-
y .
12
3
.A
5
6
7
8
9
10
Tel
: (9
25)
935-
5005
O\)
.£>
. O
J K
J t—
>
17
18
19
20
/21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
" • • : • ' . ' iv . '. ' '•' \ i • ; : '
"P n n P§4 S3
Owen T. Mascott, Esq. (State Bar No. 134243) U H 1 \»675 Ygnacio Valley Rd., Suite B213Walnut Creek, CA 94596 „„,, -^ ••'rs
Tel: (925) 935-5005
•M&taiy for Plaintiff RepDefense Solutions, Inc. ->- ;; r'.-.a^ y^ ^^^-^
^B!
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA A A A O A
RepDefense Solutions, Inc. ) Case No.
Plaintiffs, ) Unlimited Civil Case
2= 0=1
ssSrifr^
mSpF?
j .
vs. ) COMPLAINT AND APPLICATION FOR) INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
Demoin Stroman III )
Defendant. PER LOCAL RULE 5 THIS) CASE IS ASSIGNED TO) npPT '
' TrfTE 7 "IP1 A "^IL?BY FAX
PARTIES
L RepDefense Solutions, Inc. ("Plaintiff') is at all times mentioned herein
/
a California
business organized and has always enjoyed a very good business reputation and respect in the
community.
2. Defendant Demoin Stroman III ("Defendant") is an individual that, upon information and
belief resides in County of Contra Costa, California.
PARTIES
3. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action. Plaintiff seeks a
permanent injunction and/or damages in excess of the jurisdiction minimum of the unlimited jurisdiction
of the Superior Court.
4. Venue is proper in the Court because the tortious acts complained of occurred in Contra
Costa County and it is believed that the Defendants reside in Contra Costa County, California.
1
12
3
«> 5L. .-a 55 v>« 3 T? Opa v> S; otil
„ <tt 0> , -ver S £ in
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FACTS COMMON TO ALL ALLEGATIONS
5. Upon information and belief, Defendant published false statements on the Internet
concerning Plaintiff on the website http://wwvv.pissedconsumer.com, and http://www.ripoffreport.com.
among others.
6. The statements published by Defendant are false, disparaging, impugn Plaintiffs
business reputation, and injuriously affect Plaintiff in its trade and profession.
7. These statements include, among others, that Plaintiff:
a. Defendant claims "scammer fraud"
b. "they are liars thieves and extortionists"
c. "stop getting scammed"
d. "scam people with a smile"
e. "I got ripped off'
f. "dishonest culture"
g. "they lie"
h. "false advertising"
(a-i collectively hereafter referred to as the "Statements")
The false and libelous Statements are attached hereto as Exhibit A.
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
(Defamation - Libel and Libel Per Se Against All Defendants)
8. Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 7, inclusive, as though fully set
forth herein, in support of this cause of action.
9. Defendant published false Statements on the Internet websites pissedconsumer.com, and
ripoffreport.com, among others stating, among other things, that Plaintiff is a scam.
10. Defendant authored and published the Statements without privilege or authorization.
11. The Statements constitute libel per se as they are false, defamatory, impugn Plaintiffs
business reputation, and injuriously affects Plaintiff in its trade and profession.
12. Plaintiff is informed and believes and, upon that basis, alleges that the Statements were
written and published with malice in that those publications were made with knowledge of their falsity, or
COMPLAINT AND APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
u .-ti g) in« 3 -* OCO oo o> o« r "O
. , 0-= » I/J
li
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
with reckless disregard as to the truth or falsity of the statements. Plaintiff is further informed and believes
and, upon that basis, alleges that such publications were specifically directed and communicated to Plaintiffs
customers, or individuals considering Plaintiffs services, for the purpose of damaging Plaintiffs reputation.
As a direct and proximate result of the Statements, Plaintiff has suffered significant
reputational harm and sustained actual damages including, but not limited to, loss of capital and revenue; lost
productivity, expenses incurred, and loss of intangible assets.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
(Defamation - Libel and Libel Per Se - Application for Permanent Injunction)
14. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1-13 as
though set forth fully herein.
15. Defendant published false statements on the Internet websites pissedconsumer.com, and
ripoffreport.com, others things, that Plaintiff is a scam.
16. Defendant authored and published the Statements without privilege or authorization.
17. The Statements constitute libel per se as they are false, defamatory, impugn Plaintiffs
business reputation, and injuriously affects Plaintiff in its trade and profession.
18. Plaintiff is informed and believes and, upon that basis, alleges that the Statements were
written and published with malice in that those publications were made with knowledge of their falsity,
or with reckless disregard as to the truth or falsity of the statements. Plaintiff is further informed and
believes and, upon that basis, alleges that such publications -were specifically directed and communicated
to Plaintiffs customers, or individuals considering Plaintiffs services, for the purpose of damaging
Plaintiffs reputation.
19. As a direct and proximate result of the false Statements, Plaintiff has suffered significant
reputational harm and sustained actual damages including, but not limited to, loss of capital and revenue, lost
productivity, expenses incurred, and loss of intangible assets.
20. Plaintiff requests a permanent injunction halting Defendants continued dissemination of the
false statements described herein, and further ordering Defendant to request Google, Bing, Yahoo! and other
search engine providers to remove the websites listed from their respective search results. Without a
permanent injunction judgment of this Court, Defendants' false statements will continue to cause great and
3
COMPLAINT AND APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
12
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
=•= £ vJ1 153£$.£
Slig 16« SbfeS> 17. • \r> i/-* t-e °
I 18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
*• •- K </)a ^ S §
Is " o\e injury to Plaintiff. Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law for injuries that they are currently
suffering and is threatened to be suffered from these false statements.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant as follows:
1. For Injunctive relief, Defendant is:
(a) prohibited from creating or publishing statements about Plaintiff or it's officers, managers,
employees, business partners, agents, servants, attorneys,, representatives, products, goods or sendees, which
defame, disparage, or contain libelous statements about Plaintiff; and
(b) ordered to take all action, including but not limited to, requesting removal from the internet
search engines including Google, Yahoo!, and Bing, of all defamatory, disparaging, libelous, and false
statements about Plaintiff that Defendant has posted on the Internet.
2. For any and all other relief to which the Court determines Plaintiff is entitled.
DATED: February Q'2. ,2016.
Owen T. Mascott, Esq. (State Bar No. 134243)675 Ygnacio Valley Rd., Suite B213Walnut Creek, CA 94596Telephone: (925) 935-5005
Attorney for Plaintiff RepDefense Solutions, Inc.
COMPLAINT AND APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
Reputation Defender -Reputationdefender.com biggestripoff ever they are only a scam
4 of 4 Reputation Defender Reviews
9 Dallas, Texas Mar 26, 2010 702 views 4 comments
Reputation defender fails to live up to it's promises.They will lure the customerin with the line 100 1st page placements, 2000-3000 backlinks, 1st pagevisibility in 60-90 days on the organic side of the Google search.
Then when asked to show results they will tell you to be patient things taketime but to keep paying their bills. 3 months into their program customerservice was poor at best my sales rep had left the company after twisting armsgot a meeting.
After 6 months of seeing no improvement I told reputationdefender.com thattheir would be no more payments until someone sat down and showed me thatsomething was being done.I haven't received any news fromreputationdefender since then and they won't answer my calls or return mymoney.
More Review Details
Review categoryInternet
Review rating5 out of 5
review #176300 by Ifred890
Reputation Defender Lies
3 of 4 Reputation Defender Reviews
9Wakefield, Rhode Island Qct 19, 2010 611 views 2 comments
Reputation Defender lies by posting all kinds of nonsense about you and yourwork without any confirmation of who you are or what you do.The companypromises to destroy "old" informatin that might not be flattering , but reallycannot do so because the company only adds to your profile - it does not "takedown" information that is bad or unflattering.
Do not invest in this company and do not fall for its false advertiseing.
Additionally, Reputation Defender will access your checking account or otherpayment options without your permission to pay for unauthorized services - inmy case, they accessed my checking account to continue a service they hadalready failed at providing.REPUTATION DEFENDER IS A FAILURE - DO NOT
PURCHASE!!!
Comment
More Review Details
Product or serviceReputation Defender
Review categoryProfessional Services
Review rating4 out of 5
Share
y
review #203379 by anonymous
0
1 y0 Helpful? No 2 Yes 11
y 2 y 11
.By consumers, for consumers...
SC^^SMS Frauds Reported. File your review.Consumers educatin^eonsurners.-^.-- - , .,.
RLE A REPORT
Don't let them get away with it!® Let the truth be known!1
SEARCHCompany Name or Report #
Review Latest Reports Advanced Search Browse Categories
Total Visits since 1998: 8,820,000,000 Estma.ed money Consumers saved since 1998: $15,449,000,000.68 Reports filed: 2,025,444
a Report
Program &
Services FAQs Resources Directory
Ripoff Report protects consumers first amendment right to free speech
Ripoff Report Investigates, Sponsored By...
COMING SOON..,
Repair your reputation the right \vey
Corporate Advocacy Program
Loar How to Buy andInvest in Silver Today!
• tEARCAPITAL
A new investigative Series uncovering Consumer Fraud ai its worst.
Real-estate Fraud. Homes and property across America being stolen -
doors locked so you cannot get back in!
See the promo video »
Report: #691357
Complaint Review: reputation.com - removeripoffreport false claims
Related Reports
jntgmet local listings DesentiveAdvertising ,' False Advertisingi?a n ts An a Caijfgmja
SP£CiriC INFORMATIONCONTAINED IK THiS REPORTWAS FOUND TO BEFALSE/DEFAMATORY BY ACOURT. OUT__Q£_g£SP£CT_FQ.R
I THE JUDICIAL PROCESS. THE! SPECIFIC INFORMATION...
Dvnamjs Recovery Sections Scamcompany knows my personal intoclaims 1 owe a debt but providesno proof or receipt fmm navmerus
Remits Us n.som RsautationDafent^sr R&DLjtalton.coffj _a.ksRgputafen Defender is a ssam_Rg__d_'j!g]od City_Caliform3
Titan Group ina.nciaj.LLC cjsjms.jowe a pay day loan from 2012.rvsvcr contacted me to msKe
I Submitted: Sat, February 05,2011 Updated: Mon, December 08, 2014
Reported By: Userl 234567 — Valencia California United States of America
reputation.com — remove ripoffreport false claims Phone:
lnternet Web: www.reputation.comUnited States of America
Category: Internet Services
Map data ©2C16 Google
ra n d fi rpg n ts_ so _ jfaftinleres;. chBrg&_&.wpUid bujjjj..,.,
Secure a $ne cts .co re.jraQsyrDhjs.coni. Frank Seljars andSecure Aspect? wiB violate vourpsrsona! security! Qfoville iritemet
TaiKge.cGfn. Crijjje. Chopper.VeHow Marie Janes. StiplHann'sS-'riept. oriienrtg.pjzgas, false
o cctee. lelaononBh_8rassmsnt. Tgjtte.e.cpm ,P_
SKT Themes Shn Sons! SinhaShrj Knshna TachtitJiogies SKTThemes-febeativerllslna.frpuduk'ni act^'ities, atmcioussiiRpor.NaQOiirArBa. India int...
Prslect Ameneg Rip slf dug tp 2?z\$e_.ajEtfms Austin.Texas
s CMSLRresrriir&e5
Reputation.com Read this before you signup for Reputation.com, Internet*Consumer Comment: Reputation Defender Link
'Consumer Comment: Reputation.com Negative Reviews
'REBUTTAL Owner of company: luc simonet optimistan.net
SPAMMER FRAUD BRUXELLES BRUXELLES
'General Comment: They will raise negative results UP that are
under vour name
*Consumer Comment: How is it in anv wav ethical to "sanitize" a
doctor's malpractice record?'
'General Comment: how can these crooks still be in business
summed bv Bnari lee West Paim they are liars thieves and extortionists
*UPDATE EX-emplovee responds: Ex-Emplovee <
I ReDutation.com. free info
verities &1
-.businesses you can trust!
vanned Business Directom
See It Now
Same Osy Cash
SEVEN DAYS.
A WEEK
> Get $2,500 -550,000
*• No Pre-Pav^cnt Penalties
* Get Your Cash, Keep tour Car
LEAR CAPITAL is "A GOODHONEST BUSINESS"
COMMITTED TO"100% CUSTOMER
SATISFACTION"
fC'Uvl«.Kcn>uroff KirctRT
ilness belt)upm Nir.io.' Rae's company sailed"Hourglass Ganc". I found them
of This Dealgishis • TookMy Money And Ran MiarrJ Florida
uul.com
satisfaction. TCP Logisticsmaintains s&:fcrmance-dfiVBnculture tecusgd...
black... Asrf Ali. H^-Pi. Gauiam ,VK Shastri Nikbll Sharma...
TIMOTHSIDES. ED HALEV. EDWARDHALEY MASIOBENDICHOANNEX PUMPING NEVER PAY'SEMPLOYEES .' LABOR BOARD...
^General-Comment: STOP GETTING SCAMMED ,,, ,1,,,,-, ,g ,.,,.„.,_,,.
*Consumer Suggestion: Reputation.com reviews law professorAnn Bartow accused Michael Fertik's company of
*General Comment: these guvs scam people with a smile
*Consumer Comment: Online Reputation Management Services
*Consumer Comment: I got ripped of by reputation.com ( akareputation defender) for over £5.000
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Muqshots.com akaReputationDefender.com aka ReputationDefenders.com akaReputation.com. ConsultinolVID.com aka Michael Fertik + his other693 domain names
*Consurner Comment: I have big time issues withReputationDefender.com aka Reputation.com
^Consumer Comment: Liijit Networks. Hardly.
*UPDATE EX-emplovee responds: Reputation.com, FederatedMedia Publishing, Lijit Networks. Automated DefamationCampaigns by Reputatation Management Companies To ExtortYour Money To Remove Thev Created fReputation.com. Liiit)
*General Comment: Lijit Hacking is lying and petulant.
^UPDATE EX-employee responds: Lijit Networks and FederatedMedia Publishing Sold Illicit SQL Code to Reputation.com
'General Comment: The riooff report is false.
*Consumer Comment: reputation.com riooff crooks - liars shouldbe punished - MSNBC should pay. Michael Fertik is a riooff scam.
*Consumer Comment: reputatJon.com can't hide fromripoffreport.com on the first page of Google! how ironic. HowardStern should be ashamend for promoting such scum.
*Consumer Comment: reputation.com would not refund ourmoney or remove content that makes no sense. Employee saiddishonest culture at reputation.com
Like i 0 j I O*l i Recommend '.his on Googie !?;-?.
REBUTTAL BOX1"' I Resaond to this Report!
3I'3 NpOrfl
Mv ' TGB BLT' Had a " foltenasle ' 3acc-i nee an unusualobrWgstprjrt Connectir.ut
Add Rebuttal to this Report
File New Report .........
You will have to email or chat with these guys to seethere t's & c's. Below is one of the many BS conditions inthe user agreement:
•You authorize us to use the information you provide tocreate and publish web content. You granf us the right topublish any or all of the content you provide on anywebsites we deem fit for the purposes of theMyReputation service. You authorize us to modify anycontent as we see fit to provide the service. You warrantthat you have the right to distribute the content youprovide us, and to indemnify us against any damagesarising from the use of the content you provide, whetherdue to copyright infringement or other reason. Youauthorize us to act on your behalf in creating accounts onother sites in your name."
Buyer beware!
CENTER OF PEORIA peoriaArizona
<— Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business iswilling to make acommitment tocustomer satisfactionClick here now..
Does your business have a bad
reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
SEO ReputationManagement at its best!
li«off ReportiEGAL
CM-010ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name Stale Bar number, and address):
— Owen T. Mascott, Esq. (State Bar IN. 134243)675 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite B213Walnut Creek, CA 94596
TELEPHONE NO, 925-935-5005 FAX NO: 925-237-8839ATTORNEY FOR (Name):
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Cdltta C(3StaSTREET ADDRESS: 725 COUTt StTCetMAILING ADDRESS:
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Martinez, 94553BRANCH NAME: .:-'. f ~ . . J
CASE NAME:
RepDefense Solutions, Inc. v Demoin Stroman IIICIVIL CASE COVER SHEET
1 / 1 Unlimited 1 .1 Limited(Amount (Amountdemanded demanded isexceeds $25,000) $25,000 or less)
Complex Case Designation
1 1 Counter 1 1 Joinder
Filed with first appearance by defendant(Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.402)
FOR COURT USE OA CC3 ~l r r
FDiLl
" ~CJ < -- **-
.M.iWjTOlTCASENUMBER: U. . CDFl I
JUDGE: •»
DEPT:
3
---;
W-,.
^-^
rD)2- 0'
Items 1-6 below must be completed (see instructions on page 2).Check one box below for the case type that best describes this case:Auto Tort
Auto (22)Uninsured motorist (46)
Other PI/PD/WD (Personal Injury/PropertyDamage/Wrongful Death) TortF~l Asbestos (04)
I I Product liability (24)
I I Medical malpractice (45)
I I Other PI/PD/WD (23)
^Jon-PI/PD/WD (Other) Tort
Business tort/unfair business practice (07)
Civil rights (08)
Defamation (13)Fraud (16)
Intellectual property (19)
Professional negligence (25)
Other non-PI/PD/WD tort (35)
aaaEmploymentI I Wrongful termination (36)
I Other employment (15)
ContractBreach of contract/warranty (06)
Rule 3.740 collections (09)
Other collections (09)
Insurance coverage (18)
Other contract (37)
Real PropertyJ Eminent domain/Inverse
condemnation (14)I | Wrongful eviction (33)
I | Other real property (26)
Unlawful DetainerI I Commercial (31)
I I Residential (32)
I I Drugs (38)
Judicial ReviewI I Asset forfeiture (05)
I I Petition re: arbitration award (11)
I I Writ of mandate (02)
] Other judicial review (39)
Provisionally Complex Civil Litigation(Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.400-3.403)
Antitrust/Trade regulation (03)
Construction defect (10)
Mass tort (40)
Securities litigation (28)I I Environmental/Toxic tort (30)
J Insurance coverage claims arising from theabove listed provisionally complex casetypes (41)
Enforcement of Judgment
I I Enforcement of judgment (20)
Miscellaneous Civil Complaint
I I RICO (27)
I I Other complaint (not specified above) (42)
Miscellaneous Civil Petition
I I Partnership and corporate governance (21)
] Other petition (not specified above) (43)
This case L I is I / I is not complex under rule 3.400 of the California Rules of Court. If the case is comfactors requiring exceptional judicial management:a. I I Large number of separately represented parties d. I I Large number of witnessesb. I I Extensive motion practice raising difficult or novel
issues that will be time-consuming to resolvec. | I Substantial amount of documentary evidence
e. I I Coordination with related actions pending in one or more courtsin other counties, states, or countries, or in a federal court
f. I I Substantial postjudgment judicial supervision
3. Remedies sought (check all that apply): a.|_/J monetary4. Number of causes of action (specify): TWO5. This case I I is I / I is not a class action suit.6. If there are any known related cases, file and serve a notice of related case. (
Date: 02/02/2016Owen T. Mascott
b. I / I nonmonetary; declaratory or injunctive relief c. I I punitive
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY FOR PARTY)
NOTICE• Plaintiff must file this cover sheet with the first paper filed in the action or proceeding (except small claims cases or cases filed
under the Probate Code, Family Code, or Welfare and Institutions Code). (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.220.) Failure to file may resultin sanctions.
• File this cover sheet in addition to any cover sheet required by local court rule.• If this case is complex under rule 3.400 et seq. of the California Rules of Court, you must serve a copy of this cover sheet on all
other parties to the action or proceeding.• Unless this is a collections case under rule 3.740 or a complex case, this cover sheet will be used for statistical purposes only.
of 2
Form Adopted for Mandatory UseJudicial Council of CaliforniaCM-010 [Rev. July 1,2007]
CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Cal. Rules of Court, rules 2.30, 3.220, 3.400-3.403, 3.740;Cal. Standards of Judicial Administration, std. 3.10
wvfw.couriinfo.ca.gov