Post on 13-Nov-2015
description
transcript
P
The F-35 Jomission and AMLCD watactical fightenvironmentcrews with th Key design iand reliabilitensure that th
As mission required to adisplays (AMgreater capab One way thamission comdisplays. Thglass cockpaccess to cussingle panor
anorami
oint Strike Figto provide th
as developed anter. Key systemt. Certain olderhis level of inc
issues that hadty concerns tohe pilot would
demands on thaccomplish the
MLCDs) in thebility and incre
at cockpit systemplexity is by hroughout the pit, where funstom glass sizeamic display th
Figur
ic Cockpi
M
L-3 1355 Blue
ghter (JSF) ince pilot with thnd is being depm innovationsr generation ai
creased capabil
d to be overcomo avoid single-
always have a
he fighter piloe mission has
e early 1990s, seased situation
em designers hcombining th1990s and 20ctions were gres for military hat spans the e
re 1: Simplified
it Display
Mark Fletche
3 Communicegrass Lakes
AB
corporates the he increased siployed for the fs had to be emircraft are nowlity.
me dealt with s-point failures.access to critica
1. INT
ots have increaalso increased
succeeding genal awareness, w
have sought tohe functions o00s, this consoouped onto disapplications, tntire width of t
d cockpit design
ys for Ta
er and David
cations Displs Pkwy, Alph
BSTRACT
latest technolituational awarfirst time. This
mployed to allow considering i
sunlight readab A completelyal mission and
TRODUCTIO
ased through td. With the anerations of figwhile at the sam
o relieve the pilf numerous gaolidation resulsplays of typicathis consolidatithe cockpit as
n is enabled by
actical M
d Huffman
lay Systemsharetta, GA
logy for aeriareness needed s 20" by 8" dispow this technoincorporating a
bility, vibrationy redundant syflight data.
ON
the years, the advent of the ughter cockpit dme time allowi
lots increasingauges and indlted in most figally 10.4-inch ion takes the nshown in Figu
the use of pano
Military C
30004
l combat. To in today's bat
play is the largology to functia panoramic di
n resistance, toystem design h
demands on thusage of activedesigns have soing higher leve
g workload in dicators into coghters embracidiagonal sizes
next step to groure 1 below.
oramic displays.
Cockpits
support this attlespace, a pangest fielded to dion in this demisplay to provi
ouch-screen ophad to be empl
he display teche-matrix liquidought to give thels of readabilit
the face of inconsolidated ining the concep
s or similar. Noup all function
.
aircraft's noramic date in a manding ide their
peration, loyed to
hnology d-crystal he pilots ty.
creasing ntegrated pt of the ow with ns into a
Three-Dimensional Imaging, Visualization, and Display 2010 and Display Technologies and Applications for Defense,Security, and Avionics IV, edited by Bahram Javidi, Jung-Young Son, John Tudor Thomas, Daniel D. Desjardins,
Proc. of SPIE Vol. 7690, 769016 2010 SPIE CCC code: 0277-786X/10/$18 doi: 10.1117/12.853032
Proc. of SPIE Vol. 7690 769016-1
Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 04/24/2015 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms
This paper will highlight certain characteristics of a panoramic display produced by L-3 Display Systems with its initial application in the F-35 strike fighter. This display has an active viewing area of eight-inches high by twenty-inches wide, and represents the largest single display used today in a tactical fighter cockpit.
2. DESIRABLE ATTRIBUTES OF A PANORAMIC DISPLAY Perhaps the most important attribute of a cockpit panoramic display (or any cockpit display) is its readability under any and all conditions. This includes all ambient luminance levels from full sunlight impinging on the display surface to the ability to operate under night flying conditions and compatibility with night-vision imaging goggles. A display with an integrated touch interface has the additional requirement to have a touch technology that performs under these same conditions. The reliability of the panoramic display is even more critical than smaller displays as a result of its multifunctional usage. In the F-35 fighter, the L-3 panoramic display, shown in Figure 2, is the pilots most critical means for accomplishing the mission. Any failures of the display will severely compromise if not eliminate the pilots ability to achieve success. For this reason, system designers generally elect to incorporate a high level of redundancy into the display system from the display surface and touch screen, through the driving electronics and processing system, and even into the power supply. No single failure will cause the display to be completely blank.
Figure 2: The panoramic cockpit display with touch-screen developed for the F-35. In addition to electrical redundancy, it is important that the display surface be designed in a redundant fashion. The L-3 panoramic display consists of a single piece of glass that is partitioned into two separate halves. By incorporating this redundancy into the design of the AMLCD glass itself, the display can achieve the seamless operation necessary to take full advantage of the twenty-inch wide screen. The backlight is partitioned into two independently controlled circuits, so that it does not represent a single-point failure.
Proc. of SPIE Vol. 7690 769016-2
Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 04/24/2015 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms
A panoramicallowing thewearing nigcompatibility The display design is captesting speciexplosive deforces, humito pass these .
There are foThese factorperformanceoverall dispapplication.
For many usquality mustany conditiopersonal safetimely mann
c cockpit disple display to funght-vision goggy with respect
must be mechpable of this oifications. Thecompression, idity, rain expoe stringent tests
our main factorrs are performae drivers that hlay quality.
Figure 3: Go
sers, a displayt be as good or ons of temperafety can be inflner, even under
lay must provinction at low lgles. The dispto radiated em
hanically robusoperation, enviese tests will toperation in e
osure, and corrs.
3. KEY P
rs that are primance, reliabilityhad to be consi
Figure 3 show
ood display opti
s optical perfobetter than the
ature, altitude,luenced by ther conditions of
ide for both a ight levels for play must also
missions and sus
st for operatioironmental quatypically incluexplosive atmorosive salt-fog
PERFORMA
me consideratioy, system safetydered in the dews a typical
cal performanc
Optic
formance may e quality of you, and under fuir ability to qu
f extreme stress
day mode anthe pilots nig
o be compatibsceptibility to o
n over all spealification testiude testing oveosphere, randotesting. It is n
ANCE CHAR
ons for every my, and of coursesign of the pacockpit displa
ce is key to rapi
cal Performanc
be the most imur home televiull sunlight couickly glance as. For this rea
nd a night mght-adapted eyble with the other equipmen
cified environming must be coer the full opeom vibration, sno trivial matte
RACTERIST
major cockpit se, cost. This anoramic display format whi
id information t
e
mportant perfosion, but must onditions. That his display ason, high contr
mode, with the es or for operaaircrafts levents emanation
ments. In ordonducted per trational tempeshock and craser to design a d
TICS
display in usesection will aday and how thich could be
transferral for t
ormance featuralso achieve th
he pilots missand receive updrast and high r
night mode opation while theels of electromns.
der to confirm the applicable erature range, sh shock, accedisplay rugged
e in the militaryddress some ofheir solutions im
used in a pan
the pilot.
re. The displayhis performancsion effectivendated informatresolution are e
peration e pilot is magnetic
that the military altitude, eleration
d enough
y today. f the key mpacted noramic
y image ce under ness and tion in a essential
Proc. of SPIE Vol. 7690 769016-3
Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 04/24/2015 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms
characteristics. A display that achieves very high contrast ratio with high resolution will be perceived as having a good quality image. Key factors in achieving high contrast ratio are:
Very low optical system specular reflectance; Very low optical system diffuse reflectance; Very high display brightness (use of light-emitting diodes versus fluorescent bulbs in backlight); Very high AMLCD intrinsic contrast ratio.
Other system design factors which contribute to good optical performance are:
Wide backlight daytime dimming ratio (greater than 400:1) Wide backlight nighttime dimming ratio (greater than 1000:1) Large area uniformity better than 80% over the entire viewing area Fast AMLCD response time to reduce image blur in fast moving graphics or video
One factor in good optical performance which must be considered especially in the tactical fighter application is the effect of display luminance on canopy reflections. The display and its corresponding backlight system must be designed to reduce the effects of stray light which might reflect off of the glass canopy and cause viewing problems for the pilot in his forward field of view. This may be done with special films or coatings, similar to commercial privacy filters for laptop uses. Finally, good color saturation is key to providing a quality display capable of communicating necessary information to the pilot quickly. As shown in Figure 4, light-emitting diodes (LEDs) with separate red, green, and blue components yield the best color saturation and color gamut for the display. LEDs have in general resulted in much better quality displays than the earlier generation displays which utilized cold-cathode fluorescent lamps (CCFLs) for their illumination.
Figure 4: RGB LEDs give best color quality for AMLCD.
Proc. of SPIE Vol. 7690 769016-4
Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 04/24/2015 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms
Another keycockpit, is thgoggles. Aldisplays in tpresented thadesigners to AMLCD maconjunction the display requirement Figure 5 sho
For a panoraoperation denormal methreach and opuser can usedrop cursorsand order the
y performance he ability of thlthough in opertheir night-moat might interfcarefully spec
ay have to bewith the coloroptical systemextends to the
ows the typical
amic display, aepicted on the hod of placing perator fatigue e their finger tos, text, and grae precedence o
characteristic he display to bration, the pilo
ode of operatiofere or bloomcify the allowae specified to r filters to achi
m was designed integrally lighspectrum nece
Figure 5:
Touc
a touch-screendisplay surfacpushbuttons arthat would res
o virtually puaphics. The toof windows in a
that is cruciabe compatible
ot may look bon, the display the night-visable frequencybe compatible
ieve the necessd to be compaht switch panelessary to achiev
Typial night-vi
ch-Screen Syst
n user interfacece. Due to theround the perimsult from havinush software-pouch screen intan intuitive ma
al in certain m with the user
below their goy has the requion goggles (N
y spectrum of be with the NVsary emission satible with Gels located just bve the required
ision complianc
tem Design and
e is the most de panoramic dmeter of the disng to press butprogrammable terface can alsoanner.
military applicars night-visionoggles to view uirement that nNVG). This rebacklight emis
VG, or else a spectrum. In ten III, Class Bbelow the maind level of comp
ce emission spec
d Performance
desirable way fdisplays width splay would nottons located obuttons presen
o be used to si
ations, includinn enhancementinformation th
no colors or dquirement caussions. The cofilter may neethe case of L-3B night-vision n display area patibility.
ctrum
e
for the pilot towhich spans t
ot be acceptablver a twenty-innted on-screenize windows o
ng the tacticalt equipment inhat is presentedisplay formats
uses the displayolor filters useed to be empl3s panoramic
goggles. A Cof the cockpit
o control the mthe entire cockle due to the exnch span. Inst
n, as well as dron-screen and t
l fighter ncluding d on the s can be y system ed in the loyed in display, Class A display.
modes of kpit, the xcessive tead, the rag-and-to move
Proc. of SPIE Vol. 7690 769016-5
Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 04/24/2015 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms
There are several touch-screen technologies in current use for the display system designer to select from. The selection process for the proper touch screen technology for a panoramic cockpit application, must consider the following requirements:
No impact to display contrast; No visible artifacts embedded within the screen (spacer balls, internal conductors); No impact to night-vision compatibility performance; No impact to EMI performance; Must work with a gloved finger or any stylus; Must perform flawlessly under all environmental conditions; Much have sufficient touch resolution to correctly follow the users activation;
From a mechanical standpoint, the choice of touch-screen technology should result in as narrow a border as possible and should have little impact on the display system mechanical envelope and overall power dissipation. Each touch technology involves a measurement when a touch event occurs. Different technologies are designed to react to the touch event via a change in the normal condition as shown in the Table I below.
Table I: Touch Technologies and Their Method of Measurement Measurement Parameter Touch Technology
Charge/Current Surface Capacitive
Change in capacitance Projective Capacitive
Time delay or delta Surface Acoustic Wave
Absence of IR light Optical, Infrared, Vision
Voltage Resistive
Mechanical bending waves Acoustic Pulse Recognition, Dispersive Signal
Mechanical Force Force Sensing
Presence of light (AMLCD Backlight) or capacitance or voltage
AMLCD in cell
Unfortunately, there is no single optimal touch-screen technology solution for a military cockpit display. All touch technologies have particular strengths and weaknesses. The requirements for each military system must be reviewed and compared with the known strengths and weakness of the candidate touch-screen technology with the knowledge that inevitably compromises will have to be made. These trade studies must be conducted early in the display development. In the case of a panoramic cockpit display, despite its inherent disadvantages, infrared technology seems to offer the very best in optical qualities, and in general, provides the best overall performance when measured against all system requirements.
Proc. of SPIE Vol. 7690 769016-6
Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 04/24/2015 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms
Other Performance Attributes and Trade Studies The ultimate display design will result in a display designed to look great under all conditions and still will meet all of the other system requirements. Many times these requirements may have conflicting attributes which require the designer to compromise on one requirement in order to obtain a good blend of specification performance. Examples of performance attributes which may be mutually exclusive or conflicting include:
AMLCD response time vs. AMLCD clearing point temperature Large area uniformity vs. canopy reflection reduction Low specular reflectance vs. EMI front shield attenuation (low resistance) AMLCD transmission vs. AMLCD color saturation High luminance levels vs. low power dissipation Mechanical robustness vs. low system weight.
Design for reliability requires a display design that is made for a twenty to thirty year life expectancy. Unfortunately, typical electronic component life-cycles are significantly shorter than this time period, so a robust components obsolescence plan must be developed early in the product life. System safety considerations will typically require that all software and firmware be certified in accordance with strict development standards. For firmware embedded in field-programmable-gate-arrays (FPGAs), certification to standard DO-254 may be required. Operational software must be written, tested, and certified to the requirements of DO-178. This firmware or software includes that which controls display functionality such as backlight control, heater control, touch-screen operation, and display built-in-test. While all of these performance trade-offs require compromises, no display can be designed which is not affordable for the ultimate customer. Cost is often in direct conflict with performance. Military systems typically have very low rates of production with a relatively small number of units produced over a long period of years. These high performance expectations offer constant opportunity for cost reduction and engineering value improvement trade studies. Programs such as the F-35 fighter display program are always exploring cutting edge technologies which have the ability to maintain or increase performance while offsetting costs.
4. CONCLUSION As can be seen, performance expectations for new generation tactical fighter displays are very high. There are many requirements whose individual solutions present conflicts that need to be evaluated through trade-off analyses. Fortunately, these technical challenges are the impetus that forces innovation which yields better displays. A new level of performance has been created in the design of the panoramic cockpit display. Its size and versatility have given the aircraft system-level engineers new ways to give the ultimate user, the airborne warfighter, more tools to complete their mission and greater situational awareness to ensure a safe return from the mission.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors wish to thank and acknowledge our technology teammates and system design experts at Lockheed Martin Fort Worth Aeronautics System Division for their support in the development of the panoramic cockpit display for the F-35 Lightning II fighter aircraft.
Proc. of SPIE Vol. 7690 769016-7
Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 04/24/2015 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms