Parallel Random Generator - GDC 2015

Post on 15-Apr-2017

1,408 views 3 download

transcript

Parallel Random Generator Manny Ko Principal Engineer Activision

Outline

●Serial RNG

●Background

●LCG, LFG, crypto-hash

●Parallel RNG

●Leapfrog, splitting, crypto-hash

RNG - desiderata

● White noise like

● Repeatable for any # of cores

● Fast

● Small storage

RNG Quality

● DIEHARD

● Spectral test

● SmallCrush

● BigCrush

GPUBBS

Power Spectrum

Power spectrum density Radial Mean Radial Variance

Serial RNG: LCG

● Linear-congruential (LCG)

● 𝑋𝑖 = 𝑎 ∗ 𝑋𝑖−1 + 𝑐 𝑚𝑜𝑑 𝑀,

● a, c and M must be chosen carefully!

● Never choose 𝑀 = 231! Should be a prime

● Park & Miller: 𝑎 = 16807, 𝑚 = 214748647 =231 − 1. 𝑚 is a Mersenne prime!

● Most likely in your C runtime

LCG: the good and bad

● Good:

● Simple and efficient even if we use mod

● Single word of state

● Bad:

● Short period – at most m

● Low-bits are correlated especially if 𝑚 = 2𝑛

● Pure serial

LCG - bad

● 𝑋𝑘_+1 = (3 ∗ 𝑋𝑘+4) 𝑚𝑜𝑑 8

● {1,7,1,7, … }

Mersenne Prime modulo

● IDIV can be 40~80 cycles for 32b/32b

● 𝑘 𝑚𝑜𝑑 𝑝 where 𝑝 = 2𝑠 − 1:

● 𝑖 = 𝑘 & 𝑝 + 𝑘 ≫ 𝑠 ;

● 𝑟𝑒𝑡 𝑖 ≥ 𝑝 ? 𝑖 − 𝑝 ∶ 𝑖;

Lagged-Fibonacci Generator

● 𝑋𝑖 = 𝑋𝑖−𝑝 ∗ 𝑋𝑖−𝑞; p and q are the lags ● ∗ is =-* mod M (or XOR);

● ALFG: 𝑋𝑛 = 𝑋𝑛−𝑗 + 𝑋𝑛−𝑘(𝑚𝑜𝑑 2𝑚)

● * give best quality

● Period = 2𝑝 − 1 2𝑏−3; 𝑀 = 2𝑏

LFG

● The good:

●Very efficient: 2 ops + power-of-2 mod

●Much Long period than LCG;

●Directly works in floats

●Higher quality than LCG

●ALFG can skip ahead

LFG – the bad

● Need to store max(p,q) floats

● Pure sequential –

● multiplicative LFG can’t jump ahead.

Mersenne Twister

● Gold standard ?

● Large state (624 ints)

● Lots of flops

● Hard to leapfrog

● Limited parallelism

power spectrum

● End of Basic RNG Overview

Parallel RNG

● Maintain the RNG’s quality

● Same result regardless of the # of cores

● Minimal state especially for gpu.

● Minimal correlation among the streams.

Random Tree

• 2 LCGs with different 𝑎

• L used to generate a seed for R

• No need to know how many generators or # of values #s per-thread

• GG

Leapfrog with 3 cores

• Each thread leaps ahead by 𝑁 using L

• Each thread use its own R to generate its own sequence

• 𝑁 = 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 ∗ 𝑠𝑒𝑞𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒

Leapfrog

● basic LCG without c:

● 𝐿𝑘+1 = 𝑎𝐿𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑑 𝑚

● 𝑅𝑘+1 = 𝑎𝑛𝑅𝑘 𝑚𝑜𝑑 𝑚

● LCG: 𝐴 = 𝑎𝑛and 𝐶 = 𝑐(𝑎𝑛 − 1)/(𝑎 − 1) – each core jumps ahead by n (# of cores)

Leapfrog with 3 cores

• Each sequence will not overlap

• Final sequence is the same as the serial code

Leapfrog – the good

● Same sequence as serial code

● Limited choice of RNG (e.g. no MLFG)

● No need to fix the # of random values used per core (need to fix ‘n’)

Leapfrog – the bad

● 𝑎𝑝no longer have the good qualities of 𝑎

● power-of-2 N produce correlated sub-sequences

● Need to fix ‘n’ - # of generators/sequences

● the period of the original RNG is shorten by a factor of ‘n’. 32 bit LCG has a short period to start with.

Sequence Splitting

• If we know the # of values per thread 𝑛

• 𝐿𝑘+1 = 𝑎𝑛𝐿𝑘 𝑚𝑜𝑑 𝑚 • 𝑅𝑘+1 = 𝑎𝑅𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑑 𝑚

• the sequence is a subset of the serial code

Leapfrog and Splitting

● Only guarantees the sequences are non-overlap; nothing about its quality

● Not invariant to degree of parallelism

● Result change when # cores change

● Serial and parallel code does not match

Lagged-Fibonacci Leapfrog

● LFG has very long period ● Period = 2𝑝 − 1 2𝑏−3; 𝑀 = 2𝑏

● 𝑀 can be power-of-two!

● Much better quality than LCG

● No leapfrog for the best variant – ‘*’

● Luckily the ALFG supports leapfrogging

Issues with Leapfrog & Splitting ● LCG’s period get even shorter

● Questionable quality

● ALFG is much better but have to store more state – for the ‘lag’.

Crypto Hash

● MD5

● TEA: tiny encryption algorithm

Core Idea

1. input trivially prepared in parallel, e.g. linear ramp

2. feed input value into hash, independently and in parallel

3. output white noise

hash

input

output

TEA

● A Feistel coder

● Input is split into L and R

● 128B key

● F: shift and XORs or adds

TEA

Magic ‘delta’

● 𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑡𝑎 = 5 − 1 231

● Avalanche in 6 cycles (often in 4)

● * mixes better than ^ but makes TEA twice as slow

Applications

Fractal terrain

(vertex shader)

Texture tiling

(fragment shader)st

SPRNG

● Good package by Michael Mascagni

● http://www.sprng.org/

References ● [Mascagni 99] Some Methods for Parallel Pseudorandom Number Generation, 1999.

● [Park & Miller 88] Random Number Generators: Good Ones are hard to Find, CACM, 1988.

● [Pryor 94] Implementation of a Portable and Reproducible Parallel Pseudorandom Number Generator, SC, 1994

● [Tzeng & Li 08] Parallel White Noise Generation on a GPU via Cryptographic Hash, I3D, 2008

● [Wheeler 95] TEA, a tiny encryption algorithm, 1995.

Take Aways

● Look beyond LCG

● ALFG is worth a closer look

● Crypto-based hash is most promising – especially TEA.