Performance Evaluation of Precise Point Positioning (PPP) and Long-Range Baseline Approach Used in...

Post on 23-Dec-2015

214 views 1 download

Tags:

transcript

Performance Evaluation of Precise Point Positioning (PPP) and Long-Range Baseline

Approach Used in Offshore Applications

Don Kim, University of New Brunswick Christopher Griffith, Gemini Navsoft Technologies Inc. Bob Haagensen, Ocean Wireless Data Systems Inc. Sang Hyun Park, Deuk Jae Cho, Ki Yeol Seo, Korea Institute of

Ocean Science and Technology

PPP Workshop, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaJune 12-14, 2013

Offshore GNSS Applications

Offshore DP drilling rig operators typically rely on two independent satellite links for GPS corrections. They also rely on acoustic transponders on the seabed to tell them where they are and to keep them there.

About 250 of the world’s 790 deep-water drilling rigs are dynamically-positioned (DP). Six to 10 new DP rigs are being built every year. Deep-water rigs are serviced by a global fleet of about 2200 platform supply vessels. That fleet is also expanding at about 10% a year.

Potential high precision GNSS techniques for the DP applications:- Precise Point Positioning- Relative Positioning (RTK style)- Measurement Filtering

The resulting GNSS accuracy is hardly ever better than about one meter.

About a third of “Yellow Alert” DP events are caused by malfunctions in their satellite GNSS systems.

Image courtesy of Transocean, Inc.

X

Z

Y

Regularized Earth Surface

Regularized Satellite Oribt

GNSS Receiver and Antenna

Site Displacement Effects

Satellite Effects

Atmospheric Effects and Other irregularities

GNSS Satellite

GNSS Errors Sensing Mechanism

Directly sensed by the GNSS measurements.

Not in the GNSS measurements but propagated through the observation equations.

Some in the GNSS measurements but others propagated through the observation equations.

Pre-Whitening for Signal DetectionThe generic signal detection problem: a received noisy signal x(t) either contains a known deterministic signal s(t) or not.

0

kt

t

s[t]

s[t]

v[t]

x[t] T(x)Pre-whitening filter

x [t]

Pre-whitening filter

s [t]

When the process is colored rather than white, the colored process can be transformed into a white process by passing it through a whitening filter.

GNSS Range measurementsGNSS errors and noise

Range signal

Range observation equations

Received signal

Known signal

Noise

Replica signal

Whitening Process in GNSS Data Processing

x[n] DD x [n]

Pre-whitening filter

x[n] Error Modeling

x [n]

Pre-whitening filter

Relative Positioning approaches whiten the range measurements by removing common error sources at both satellites and receivers.

PPP approaches whiten the range measurements by sophisticate error modeling algorithms.

Uncommon errors or significant residuals can survive throughout the pre-whitening process and subsequently result in biased solutions.

Unmodeled or mismodeled errors can survive throughout the pre-whitening process and subsequently result in sub-optimal solutions.

FILTER PASSBANDFILTER STOPBAND FILTER STOPBAND

FILTER BANDWIDTH

A New Approach: Measurement Filtering

x[n] Bandpass Filter

x [n]

Pre-whitening filter

Since the range measurements contain a variety of error components with well characterized wave frequencies in the spectrum, signal filters (e.g., a low, high or band-pass filter) can effectively remove those error components.

Measurement Filtering approaches whiten the range measurements by signal filters.

Low cost but high accuracy and precision. No dependency on 3rd party products or services. Simplify the implementation of data processing algorithms. Avoid the risks induced by the commonality assumption.

Key Design Concept:

Simulation Test Scenarios1. Site displacement effects:

Solid earth tide, polar tides, ocean loading, atmospheric and ground water and snow build-up loading

2. Atomospheric effects:Ionospheric and tropospheric delay

3. Satellite effects:Satellite orbit error, clock offsets, antenna phase centre offsets and variations, and phase wind-up

Permanent CACS tracking sites (FRND and HLFX)

Baseline Distance Data rate Test Period Data Format

FRDN-HLFX 276 km10 sec for post-processing (resampled from 1 sec data) January 1-31, 2013 RINEX 2.11

1 sec for real-time 24/7 since April, 2013 RTCM 3.0

Image courtesy of Google Map

Solid Earth Tide Simulation

Solid Earth Tide Simulation

Comparison of the baseline solutions associated with solid earth tide effects:

ITRF coordinates correction (cyan),

GNSS measurements correction (red),

No solid earth tide correction (magenta)

The measurement filtering technique effectively blocked the solid earth tide signal in the data processing.

At each simulation test, the measurement filtering technique was used to get the baseline solutions.

Ionospheric Delay Simulation

Ionospheric Delay Simulation

Comparison of the baseline solutions associated with ionospheric effects:

Dual-frequency (Iono-Free) approach (red)

Single-frequency (L1) approach (magenta)

The signal spectrum of the atmospheric effects was relatively wide but overall the measurement filtering technique could effectively block them.

At each simulation test, the measurement filtering technique was used to get the baseline solutions.

Satellite Orbit Error Simulation

Satellite Orbit Error Simulation

Solution TypeBaseline (FRDN-HLFX) [m]

RemarksΔX ΔY ΔZ Distance

PPP 258363.012 10997.505 -97763.152 276459.808Broadcast -0.036 0.058 0.179 0.095 Δ(PPP-Broadcast)IGS Final 0.013 0.018 0.098 0.022 Δ(PPP-IGS Final)

3-D plot of the baseline solutions using different approaches:

NRCan’s online PPP solutions (green)

Measurement filtering using the IGS Final orbit (red)

Measurement filtering using the Broadcast Ephemerides (blue)

How serious is the receiver clock synchronization error?

DGNSS Network (Korea)

376 km

444 km

259 km

Image courtesy of Google Map

Baseline Distance Data rate Test Period Data FormatCCHN-DODK 376 km

10 sec April 3-May 7, 2013 RINEX 2.11CCHN-GEOM 444 kmCCHN-EOCH 259 km

Baseline Solutions & ResidualsOne month of data processing results using the measurement filtering technique revealed relative station movement.

The residuals of baseline solutions indicate that the

measurement filtering technique successfully

whitened the errors in the measurements.

Relative Station Movement Trends

DOKD

CCHN

GEOM

EOCH

N

E

D

Image courtesy of Google Map

Previous Study in the Test Area

This map illustrates the horizontal surface motions of GPS sites in Asia where the Indian, Eurasian, Pacific and Philippine see plates are in collision.

One month of data processing results using the measurement filtering technique agree very well with this tectonic movement study carried out by other research groups.

Image courtesy of Eric Calais (Purdue University), Ming Wang (Institute for Geology and Earthquake Science, China) and Zenghang Shen (IGES)

Conclusions - Measurement Filtering

Most of significant error sources can be filtered out using an appropriate measurement filter.

Requires neither sophisticate error modeling nor high quality products from international geodetic science organizations (e.g., the IGS precise orbit and clock products).

Does not rely on common (correlated) error sources between satellites and receivers.

Immune to long baseline conditions as well as localized anomalous atmospheric conditions.

Advantages:

Disadvantages:

Error sources spreading over unblocked (pass) frequencies can survive throughout the pre-whitening process and subsequently can result in sub-optimal (biased) solutions.

Future Work Improved signal

(measurement) filter design and its implementation in the commercial GNSS processing software.

Launch a test project with Ocean Wireless Data Systems Inc. and deep-water drilling rig company.

Collaboration with R&D sectors (government, academia and research institutes) for the validation of our new GNSS positioning approach in academic and scientific applications.

Acknowledgement

R&D Support• CACS Section, Geodetic Survey Division of Geomatics Canada, Natural

Resources Canada• DGNSS Central Office, Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea

R&D Funding• Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada –

Discovery Grant• National Research Council Canada - Industrial Research Assistance

Program• Korea Research Council of Fundamental Science and Technology -

National Agenda Project