Peter Briggs BDS (Hons) MSc MRD RCS FDS RCS (Eng)€¦ · Managing restorative failures in older...

transcript

Peter Briggs BDS (Hons) MSc MRD RCS FDS RCS (Eng)

Specialist Endodontic Practitioner

www.hodsollhousedental.co.uk

Peter Briggs

Clinical: Specialist Practitioner & Consultant QMUL

Education: Associate Dean, Secondary Care, Specialist Training, London (HEE)

Modern Endodontics – Never Standing Still -

Tunbridge Wells, Kent Tuesday 12th May 2015

Let’s start with a Clinical Case 2015

• Pt referred following trauma by ODS

• Hit by lathe cover in face

• Knocked out – serious max-fac injuries (hard and soft tisues)

• UL23 ‘knocked back’ by impact

• Several tooth avulsions

12 months after accident

ICP – 12 months later

• No IO space R posterior

• Good perio levels

• No caries

• Labial composite UL2 and composite UR2 – both teeth instanding

• Large and wide AF UL6 – ‘niggly’symptoms

• Wide space LR1 (8mm)

• Vertical tissue loss LR1 space visible

• Avulsion of LR1 with loss of alveolar process vertical and horizontal

• Loss (fracture & Avulsion) of UR45, LR4567 & UR 45 and LL45

• Favourable lower lip line

• Hospital unsuccessfully attempted to make Upper Chrome denture – patient could not tolerate / wear

• UL23 were re-positioned in A&E day of accident

• Patient # ‘d mandible

• Patient monitored by ODS

• ODS concerned by cervical radiolucency of UL2 – some crown discolouration

Questions UL23

• Outline your dental assessment of UL23

• What is our diagnosis and why? – both teeth non-vital

• What injuries do you think the teeth sustained?

Copenhagen Trauma Guide

Questions UL23

• How would you treat UL2?

• Outline your treatment plan and plan of treatment for UL23

• What materials would you use and why?

• What is the prognosis?

• What material would you use to repair UL2 and why?

• Would you do it in stages or all at the same time?

• Tooth ‘niggling’ since accident

• Previously RCT’s and restored with AF

• What diagnosis would you undertake?

Question UL6

• Is the tooth strategic?

• Outline you Rx and plan of treatment for UL6 – what are the challenges?

• What is the likely prognosis?

Are you happy to leave or would you cuspally-protect? Why?

Does the tooth require Re-RCT prior to definitive cuspal-protection? Why?

Is this complex, moderate difficult or routine endodontics? Why?

In 2015 - how would you do it and what will you need to improve to make it all worthwhile

Diagnostic GP point try in

How would you restore?

Nayyar Core build up

Agreed Team Standards

E-max Monolith UR6 – single strategic RCT’d tooth – biologically excellent substitute for gold

Walton Dental Arts

Why do you think that secondary care struggled with the maxillary Chrome?

Prosthodontics Questions

• Outline the challenges and problems of providing prosthodontic replacement of UR45, LR456(?7) , LR1, UL45 & LL45?

Prosthodontic - questions

• Patient has a significant legal settlement

• He ideally wants to have fixed restorations

• What would you do and why?

Refurbish, Remove, Repair or Replace?

Conventional Dentistry will eventually fail however well it is executed

Restorative Care Commissioning Guide - Complexity levels – where does this fit in ?

1. At completion of DF year

2. An experienced practitioner / DwESs

3. Complex Specialist

We all should be confident with removal of failing crowns / bridges

• For those with crowns, on average there were three per person, amounting to an estimated 47.6 million crowns across England, Wales and Northern Ireland

• Crowns have a likely survival of 8-10 years – therefore they will be failing – need redo / dismantling / operative / extraction skills

Managing restorative failures in older patients

Passive ‘lift-off’ to protect what is underneath

Where are the Pros / Endo interface risks? Let’s look at me in action – there for the grace of God go I

Abbott 2004

Caries with no de-cementation – which is worst?

Coronal Material & Coronal Seal

Long term cuspal protection and tooth looking after itself is the key

Predictive Discussions with Endodontics patients

• CAP with exudation - presence of sinus (48% lower)

Is our Endodontics going to work?

Intra-operative: Achieving patency (Two-fold increase)

Canal prepared short of terminus (12% lower for every 1mm short for tooth with CAP)

Long root filling (62% lower odds of success)

Using Chlorhexidine as irrigant (53% lower)

Using EDTA (Re-RCTx) (Two-fold increase)

Inter-appointment swelling/pain (47% lower)

Ng, Mann & Gulabivala; International Endodontic Journal, 2011

Dismantle – over 70% of all dentistry is re-do Repair, Re-treat, Restore or Replace?

Managing failure – need to develop skills to cope

Diagnosis of endodontic condition against restoration type

Abbott (2004)

Age of existing restoration within tooth prior to referral to PV Abbott for endodontic Rx

Abbott (2004)

Amalgam findings: • A ‘typical amalgam’ restoration in this study lasted a long time before

symptoms of pulpitis (rather than necrosis) developed, which indicates marginal breakdown many years after the restoration was placed.

• Both Caries and Marginal Breakdown easier to spot

• Amalgam more often associated with pulpal symptoms – suggesting better protection of seal to the pulp

Abbott (2004)

Composite Findings:

• A ‘typical composite’ restoration had passed through all of the progressive stages of pulp disease (i.e., reversible pulpitis, irreversible pulpitis, necrosis, canal infection, pulp-less) and then developed apical periodontitis within just three years.

• This indicates that they probably develop marginal breakdown & micro-leakage soon after the restoration had been placed since this pulp disease cycle typically takes between 1-5 years.

• Very difficult to ‘spot’ and diagnose the presence of caries and marginal breakdown with composite resin!

Abbott (2004)

Endodontics and the older tooth

What’s our commonest

practical difficulties in endodontics?

Dimension (mm) Cusp Tip to Pulp Roof Pulp Floor to Furcation Pulp Height

Maxillary Molar 6.24 3.05 1.88

Mandibular Molar 6.36 2.96 1.57

6.5mm Look

8.0mm Caution

11.0mm Reach for the MTA!

Deutshe A S & Musikant B L

Morphological measurements of anatomic landmarks in human maxillary and

mandibular molar pulp chamber.

IEJ 2004; 30: 388-390

Secondary dentine is deposited on the floor, of the pulp, rarely the roof

Sclerosed root canals – an ‘old tooth’ problem

Pre-bend and ‘Watch-Winders’ movement of #10 K file in combination with AL

Asymptomatic apical areas – what to do?

50% of RCT’d teeth have areas in UK (Saunders & Saunders, 1998)

Endodontic revision that we can predict to work?

• The poorer the quality of the primary root filling in situ the easier and more predictable will be your re-treatment. You can then expect a 80% positive outcome (NG et al 2011) if you can achieve your objectives

• Ideally you want to revise a short poorly obturated root fillings!

The ‘Toronto’ study

Endodontic Re-treatment decision making

Re-Treatment usually means removing Gutta Percha - do not be scared of the stuff it will not bite! – You need to get

to the end of the canal very early in your technique and achieve patency

Endodontic Issues

This gives much more time to get the irrigation right – we need it at the apex

Re-treatment has just got quicker too

Re-Endodontics has got easier and much quicker (reciprocation and MB2)

Electronic Apex Locators always use the tip (not the clip) - your nurse can put hold it on

the head of the hand-piece it doesn’t need to be on the file

Endodontic revision we can predict is likely not to work?

• High risk: perforations, resorption, ledges, blockages, iatrogenic error – anything that stops you reaching your objectives – in this case ledge within curved MB1 (stopping me reaching an ideal length) and not also able not able to identify MB2

The ‘Toronto’ study

Endodontic Re-treatment decision making

hodsollhousedental.co.uk

Pre-operative factors that made a difference to outcome:

Presence of periapical lesion (49% lower)

Size of periapical lesion (14% lower for every 1mm)

Presence of sinus (48% lower)

Presence of root perforation (56% lower)

Ng, Mann & Gulabivala; International Endodontic Journal, 2011

• The likelihood of a UK dentist facing some kind of regulatory challenge (i.e. by the GDC) is much greater than for:

• Dentists anywhere else in the world – including USA • UK medical practitioners (3.5 times risk) • Any other kind of registered healthcare professional in

the UK • Any other dentists, anywhere else in the world – period!

2015 Prosthodontic Risk for the Dental Team

2015 pyramid of risk: top of the dental pops

Endodontics

Periodontology

(or missed perio)

Nerve Damage

Implants

Orthodontics

Veneers

Oral Surgery

Effective team work reduces risk

You will see that Prosthodontics is very well represented within the major risk groups

• 4 Nerve Damage • 3 Periodontics

• 2 Crown & Bridge • 1 Endodontics

5 Implants 6 Orthodontics

8 Oral Surgery 7 Veneers

Knowing what is predictable to restore – TRI And what is not! – are too many restorable teeth being extracted?

The two significant things to note about the UK picture compared to other countries at present

are the prominence of:

• Allegations of a failure to diagnose and adequately treat periodontal disease

• Implant cases of all kinds

So what does this mean for those of you setting out on a clinical dental career?

• How do I learn and make my mistakes in clinical practice in the UK without running into trouble?

• If I accept that I will have my clinical problems - how can I minimize the chance of my patients making a complaint against me when there is a problem?

• Is my clinical experience the only thing or does my personality and my core values make a difference to my risk?

NHS Issues • Contract – promotes quality?

• Associate contract – attractive for quality or is it about quantity?

• Associate contract – are we all-in-it-together (practice manager / owner / you) when a problem occurs?

• Commissioning levels 1, 2 & 3 – where will that leave me with my skills? - will I end up being a glorified therapist / hygienist?

• Am I going to be able to make a good living out of all this?

That’s the bad news – but how can you control your own risk(s)

Adventurous Souls – Risk taker

Dangers:

• May be a little overconfident on occasions

• Too dismissive of the risks – I can always re-do it

• The challenge - as always - is to find the right balance

• Achieve balance that serves the best interests of the individual practitioner as well as that of the patient

Adventurous Souls – Risk taker - What’s the problem I can always re-do it – if there is a problem

• Professor John Adams of the Adam Smith Institute (in his 1999 book “Risky Business” - ISBN 1902737067, 9781902737065) suggests that we all have a “default” approach to risk.

• The two groups on the left are essentially problem solvers and see no need to do anything until a problem arises

• So much so that they are so confident of their problem solving skills they will give anything a go as they can repair any complication - what will be - will be!

• The two groups on the right anticipate and plan for risks in order to manage them effectively (problem finders).

A revealing insight comes from the work of Bunting and others, who found that many complaints are triggered not just by the actual event(s) that tipped the patient over the edge into complaining (“precipitating factors”) – like an adverse outcome of some kind – but also because other things had already happened (“predisposing factors”) to create doubts and concerns.

Predisposing factors included: poor communication, a perceived lack of interest, rudeness or a lack of respect and it is significant that these are “people” issues that have little or nothing to do with clinical dentistry or the actual procedures undertaken

Complaint will be ‘triggered’ by:

• Precipitating factor(s) (a final straw event)

• Predisposing factors (pre-existing doubts and concerns)

STEP ONE: Why do you need skills on the right?

• If only a precipitating factor is present (clinical incident e.g. fat face after endodontics / cut lip / failed veneers / failed implant / failed bridge) with no major predisposing factors beforehand – then only 2% of patients will make a complaint to the practice, NHS, GDC or litigate when you have make a clinical mistake

• In absence of predisposing factors they appreciate your honesty, your offer of solutions (including offer of refund), your trust, that you are caring for them and that you have done your very best

Professionalism 2015 – predisposing factors -

• Be careful calling people by their Christian name – it may not go down well with some

• Do not get too chummy with patients – they want you to be their dentist (professional) not a chummy friend

• Be careful how you look, dress and behave

So if we all accept that we need to learn and improve - how do we best make our mistakes in 2015?

• At start of your career - STEP ONE- learn the communication skills and professional approaches of the people on the right so patients that think you have done your best, that you have been kind to them and they trust you – few predisposing factors

• At start of your career – when you have made a mistake – learn to be able to look the patient in the eye and apologise for it

• Believe the view of the patient - they are usually right

• With aesthetics - the patient has the last word – and must be happy before anything is fitted / cemented definitively

• Most who have been honestly appraised of the nature and reason for a clinical error - with options for remedial action clearly explained – will be on your side

• Clearly do not charge for suboptimal work – it will only make things far worse - money back at the beginning

We will all experience failure • What will you say and how will you manage the

patient?

Why do you need skills on the right?

• In such circumstances only 2-3% of these patients will make a complaint to practice, NHS, GDC or litigate where you have make a clinical mistake

• They appreciate your honesty, your offer of other options (including refund), your trust, that you are caring for them, that you have done your very best

Why do you need skills on the right?

• They can see that you are genuinely disappointed for the poor result and that you have tried to put their interests first and will commit to improve yourself so not to have the same problem with others

Many dentists and dental practices seem to believe that they are in the dentistry business, or the tooth business, or the implant, or the veneer business or the money business. In fact they are all in the people business, and people buy people, long before they buy implants, bridges or veneers from them.

The most successful dentists are in the people business – they treat

people - not teeth!

Personality – are you adventurous or not?

• Some practitioners are cautious by nature • Others are more adventurous and perhaps less conscious of

risks (or more willing to disregard them) • My decision making is to the right – but once I know and

agree what is to be done I am comfortable working on the left

So your bar of competence will increase the better you get

• True experts will learn not to ‘charge in’ – because they better understand what is in the best interest of their patient

• They will want to ‘buy time for the patient’ – using less aggressive and cheaper treatment plans

Developing competence

MATTHEW SYED

• Sign up to the mission and criticism

• Learn from mistakes (reflective learning)

• Learn form others better than you

Early UG years

Late UG / DF /DCT years DCT 2/3 and early Practice years

5 -10 years of experience and training

Learning expertise / proficiency

• Knowledge

• Experience

• Critical feedback

• Raise bar of your own expectation

• Benchmark against others

• 10,000 hours – to fully master an expert skill

Peter Briggs BDS (Hons) MSc MRD RCS FDS RCS (Eng)

Specialist Endodontic Practitioner

Peter Briggs BDS (Hons) MSc MRD RCS FDS RCS (Eng)€¦ · Managing restorative failures in older...

Documents