Post on 29-Jan-2016
transcript
Productivity Rewards and Pay Illusions with Benefit Cost Increases
Sylvester J. Schieber, Ph.D.
11th Annual RRC ConferenceIssues for Retirement Security10 August 2009Washington, DC
Overview
Background– Health reform looks likely– Likely to present certain employment related costs– Already concerns that wages aren’t growing properly
The Compensation Puzzle in the Picture
Intermediate Term Outlook on Benefit Costs
Future Productivity Rewards under Alternative Health and Entitlement Reform Scenarios
Conclusions
2
3
Rich Environment for Policy Change
Health Reform
President Obama is pushing hard
Five Congressional Committees moving forward
Current Congressional recess: building backbone or causing gastric distress?
Russell Long and the theory of government finance
Who pays for health reform?– President Obama says he will not sign a bill that creates a large
increase in the deficit– Many calls for employer mandates, taxes on benefits and
curtailing public plan costs with prospects of cost shifts to employer-sponsored plans
4
5
Concerns with Recent Compensation Outcomes
Stagnation in Income Growth in Middle Classes in Early Part of the Decade
Concerns mounting that compensation for lower and middle-earners not commensurate with productivity contributions
Evidence is cited of flat earnings levels and higher unemployment in the middle of the earnings spectrum over last economic cycle
6
The Composition of Compensation
In 1995, total compensation paid to workers in the United States was $19.40 per hour on average
– 82 percent was cash wages, salaries or bonuses– 12 percent was paid in the form of retirement or health benefits– 6 percent was paid in as social insurance contributions to
government
7
Growth in Hourly Productivity and Compensation Elements 1995-2007
8
75.0
100.0
125.0
150.0
1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007
Wage
Pen/Health
ER Soc Ins
Productivity
Value of productivity and compensation elements set to 100 in 1995
Source: Derived from unpublished data from the Office of the Actuary, Social Security Administration. Wages, and benefit costs were converted into constant dollars using the GDP deflator.
Compound Annual Growth Rates in Inflation-Adjusted Hourly Compensation for Full-Time Full-Year Workers
9
Pay levels are in deciles
Source: Watson Wyatt Worldwide tabulations of the Current Population Survey, various years.
Compound Annual Growth Rates in Inflation-Adjusted Hourly Pay for Full-Time Full-Year Workers
10
Pay levels are in deciles
Source: Watson Wyatt Worldwide tabulations of the Current Population Survey, various years.
Compound Annual Growth Rates in Inflation-Adjusted Social Insurance Contributions for Full-Time Workers
11
Pay levels are in deciles
Source: Watson Wyatt Worldwide tabulations of the Current Population Survey, various years.
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1980-1990
1990-2000
2000-2007
Compound Annual Growth Rates in Inflation-Adjusted Retirement Benefits for Full-Time Workers
12
Pay levels are in deciles
Source: Watson Wyatt Worldwide tabulations of the Current Population Survey, various years.
Compound Annual Growth Rates in Inflation-Adjusted Health Benefits for Full-Time Workers
13
Pay levels are in deciles
Source: Watson Wyatt Worldwide tabulations of the Current Population Survey, various years.
Share of Compensation Gains Provided as Benefits for Selected Periods
14
Earningsdecile 1980-1990 1990-2000 2000-2007
1 100.0% 29.5% 29.1%2 100.0% 22.2% 44.6%3 87.0% 24.2% 48.9%4 52.7% 20.5% 59.6%5 61.8% 17.2% 53.6%6 41.7% 18.3% 54.5%7 46.9% 12.1% 50.2%8 35.5% 9.5% 49.7%9 29.0% 7.8% 43.8%
10 20.8% 6.9% 78.0%
Source: Steven A. Nyce and Sylvester J. Schieber, “Productivity Rewards, Pay Illusions Caused by Retirement and Health Benefit Cost Increases,” Watson Wyatt, August 2009.
Share of Compensation Gains Provided as Benefits for Selected Periods
15
Earningsdecile 1980-1990 1990-2000 2000-2007
3 87.0% 24.2% 48.9%
5 61.8% 17.2% 53.6%
8 35.5% 9.5% 49.7%
Source: Steven A. Nyce and Sylvester J. Schieber, “Productivity Rewards, Pay Illusions Caused by Retirement and Health Benefit Cost Increases,” Watson Wyatt, August 2009.
16
Intermediate Term Outlook on Benefit Costs
Social Security and Medicare HI Income and Costs as a Percentage of Covered Payroll
17Source: Office of the Actuary, Social Security Administration.
Percent of covered earnings
Average Funded Status and Contributions to DB Plans for 2000 to 2006 and projected for 2007 to 2010
18
Percent funded Contributions (billions $)
Source: “The Future of DB Plan Funding Under PPA, The Recovery Act and Relief Proposals,” Watson Wyatt Insider, January 2009. Note: (*) projected
Employer Contributions to DC Plans in Millions of Dollars from 1990 through 2007
19
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, EBSA, “Private Pension Plan Bulletin Historical Tables and Graphs,” February 2009.
Whither Goes Health Care Costs under Health Care Reform?
Highly inflationary cost environment possibly augmented with expanded demand
Where are the cost savings coming from?– Productivity improvements in the delivery sector– Added contributions for those not now covered– Reengineering of the health delivery sector
The Medicare experience– Expected inflation to moderate– Expected demand to be flat– … and then there’s more…
20
Actual Wage Growth, Expected and Actual Hospital Cost Growth under HI
21
Annual rates shown against base of 100 in 1966
Sources: Average wages were taken from the Average Wage Index series developed by the Office of the Actuary, Social Security Administration; average daily hospital charges and reimbursement rates were taken from the Social Security Bulletin Annual Statistical Supplement, 1976, p. 178, Social Security Bulletin Annual Statistical Supplement, 1981, p. 209 and Social Security Bulletin Annual Statistical Supplement, 1993, p. 311.
Actual and Estimated Hospital Utilization Rates per Aged Enrollee Under the Medicare HI Program for Selected Years
22Source: See Nyce and Schieber, p. 39.
Hospitalization days per enrollee
Completing the Trifecta: Unexpected Inflation, Unanticipated Utilization… and then Expanded Coverage
Anyone receiving a DI benefit for 24 consecutive months was given coverage
Anyone with end-stage renal disease who had been on dialysis for three months was covered
By 1984, these two groups comprised 18 percent of the caseload
23
24
Future Productivity Rewards under Alternative Scenarios
Baseline Assumptions
Productivity increases 1.7 percent per year
Retirement plan costs stay high until 2012 and then grow at rate of growth in wages
Health costs grow at rate of growth in compensation plus 1.5 percent per year down from 3.2 percent from 2000-2007
25
Baseline Projections of Annual Wage Growth Rates across Earnings Deciles for Selected Periods
26
2007 to 2015 to 2007 toIncome Deciles 2015 2030 2030
All 0.88% 1.10% 1.02%
1 0.99% 1.01% 1.00%2 0.94% 1.01% 0.98%3 0.89% 1.00% 0.96%4 0.85% 1.00% 0.95%5 0.84% 1.02% 0.96%6 0.84% 1.05% 0.97%7 0.84% 1.07% 0.99%8 0.84% 1.09% 1.00%9 0.86% 1.12% 1.03%
10 0.91% 1.17% 1.08%
Source: Steven A. Nyce and Sylvester J. Schieber, “Productivity Rewards, Pay Illusions Caused by Retirement and Health Benefit Cost Increases,” Watson Wyatt, August 2009.
Scenarios
Baseline assumptions: health costs grow at rate of growth in compensation plus 1.5 percent per year
Scenario 1: Assume that workers not covered by health insurance are mandated to be covered
27
Annual Compound Average Wage Growth until 2015
28
Health inflation Expanded All Third Median Eighth rate above coverage workers decile decile decile
wage growth
Baseline 1.5% No 0.89% 0.89% 0.84% 0.84%
Scenario 1 1.5% Yes 0.63% 0.15% 0.59% 0.76%
Source: Steven A. Nyce and Sylvester J. Schieber, “Productivity Rewards, Pay Illusions Caused by Retirement and Health Benefit Cost Increases,” Watson Wyatt, August 2009.
Annual Compound Average Wage Growth from 2015 through 2030
29
Health inflation Expanded All Third Median Eighth rate above coverage workers decile decile decile
wage growth
Baseline 1.5% No 1.10% 1.00% 1.02% 1.09%
Scenario 1 1.5% Yes 1.06% 0.88% 0.98% 1.08%
Source: Steven A. Nyce and Sylvester J. Schieber, “Productivity Rewards, Pay Illusions Caused by Retirement and Health Benefit Cost Increases,” Watson Wyatt, August 2009.
Scenarios
Baseline assumptions: health costs grow at rate of growth in wages plus 1.5 percent per year
Scenario 1: Assume that workers not covered by health insurance are mandated to be covered
Scenario 2: Coverage is expanded and recent health inflation rates persist
30
Annual Compound Average Wage Growth until 2015
31
Health inflation Expanded All Third Median Eighth rate above coverage workers decile decile decile
wage growth
Baseline 1.5% No 0.89% 0.89% 0.84% 0.84%
Scenario 1 1.5% Yes 0.63% 0.15% 0.59% 0.76%
Scenario 2 3.2% Yes 0.42% -0.25% 0.29% 0.55%
Source: Steven A. Nyce and Sylvester J. Schieber, “Productivity Rewards, Pay Illusions Caused by Retirement and Health Benefit Cost Increases,” Watson Wyatt, August 2009.
Annual Compound Average Wage Growth from 2015 through 2030
32
Health inflation Expanded All Third Median Eighth rate above coverage workers decile decile decile
wage growth
Baseline 1.5% No 1.10% 1.00% 1.02% 1.09%
Scenario 1 1.5% Yes 1.06% 0.88% 0.98% 1.08%
Scenario 2 3.2% Yes 0.68% 0.11% 0.43% 0.71%
Source: Steven A. Nyce and Sylvester J. Schieber, “Productivity Rewards, Pay Illusions Caused by Retirement and Health Benefit Cost Increases,” Watson Wyatt, August 2009.
Scenarios
Baseline assumptions: health costs grow at rate of growth in compensation plus 1.5 percent per year
Scenario 1: Assume that workers not covered by health insurance are mandated to be covered
Scenario 2: Coverage is expanded and recent health inflation rates persist
Scenario 3: Coverage is expanded and health inflation rate increases to compensation growth rate plus 6 percent per year
33
Annual Compound Average Wage Growth until 2015
34
Health inflation Expanded All Third Median Eighth rate above coverage workers decile decile decile
wage growth
Baseline 1.5% No 0.89% 0.89% 0.84% 0.84%
Scenario 1 1.5% Yes 0.63% 0.15% 0.59% 0.76%
Scenario 2 3.2% Yes 0.42% -0.25% 0.29% 0.55%
Scenario 3 6.0% Yes -0.16% -1.24% -0.48% -0.01%
Source: Steven A. Nyce and Sylvester J. Schieber, “Productivity Rewards, Pay Illusions Caused by Retirement and Health Benefit Cost Increases,” Watson Wyatt, August 2009.
Annual Compound Average Wage Growth from 2015 through 2030
35
Health inflation Expanded All Third Median Eighth rate above coverage workers decile decile decile
wage growth
Baseline 1.5% No 1.10% 1.00% 1.02% 1.09%
Scenario 1 1.5% Yes 1.06% 0.88% 0.98% 1.08%
Scenario 2 3.2% Yes 0.68% 0.11% 0.43% 0.71%
Scenario 3 6.0% Yes -0.96% -3.68% -2.03% -0.86%
Source: Steven A. Nyce and Sylvester J. Schieber, “Productivity Rewards, Pay Illusions Caused by Retirement and Health Benefit Cost Increases,” Watson Wyatt, August 2009.
Scenarios
Baseline assumptions: health costs grow at rate of growth in compensation plus 1.5 percent per year
Scenario 1: Assume that workers not covered by health insurance are mandated to be covered
Scenario 2: Coverage is expanded and recent health inflation rates persist
Scenario 3: Coverage is expanded and health inflation rate increases to compensation growth rate plus 6 percent per year
Scenario 4: Coverage is expanded and recent health rates persist and Social Security and HI reform is heavily tilted toward payroll tax increases
36
Annual Compound Average Wage Growth until 2015
37
Health inflation Expanded All Third Median Eighth rate above coverage workers decile decile decile
wage growth
Baseline 1.5% No 0.89% 0.89% 0.84% 0.84%
Scenario 1 1.5% Yes 0.63% 0.15% 0.59% 0.76%
Scenario 2 3.2% Yes 0.42% -0.25% 0.29% 0.55%
Scenario 3 6.0% Yes -0.16% -1.24% -0.48% -0.01%
Scenario 4 3.2% Yes 0.27% -0.42% 0.12% 0.39%
Source: Steven A. Nyce and Sylvester J. Schieber, “Productivity Rewards, Pay Illusions Caused by Retirement and Health Benefit Cost Increases,” Watson Wyatt, August 2009.
Annual Compound Average Wage Growth from 2015 through 2030
38
Health inflation Expanded All Third Median Eighth rate above coverage workers decile decile decile
wage growth
Baseline 1.5% No 1.10% 1.00% 1.02% 1.09%
Scenario 1 1.5% Yes 1.06% 0.88% 0.98% 1.08%
Scenario 2 3.2% Yes 0.68% 0.11% 0.43% 0.71%
Scenario 3 6.0% Yes -0.96% -3.68% -2.03% -0.86%
Scenario 4 3.2% yes 0.43% -0.21% 0.15% 0.45%
Source: Steven A. Nyce and Sylvester J. Schieber, “Productivity Rewards, Pay Illusions Caused by Retirement and Health Benefit Cost Increases,” Watson Wyatt, August 2009.
39
Getting the Horse in Front of the Cart
Advisory Board Project
Meeting with Dr. John Wennberg on the Dartmouth Atlas Projec t– Effective care – evidence based care anyone
with need should routinely receive– Preference sensitive care – cases where
alternative routines with varying risks are appropriate and patient should be involved in “informed choice” decision on treatment path
– Supply-sensitive care
40
Advisory Board Project
Meeting with Dr. John Wennberg on the Dartmouth Atlas Projec t– Effective care – evidence based care anyone with
need should routinely receive– Preference sensitive care – cases where alternative
routines with varying risks are appropriate and patient should be involved in “informed choice” decision on treatment path
– Supply-sensitive care – see the article in the June 1, 2009 New Yorker comparing treatment patterns in McAllen and El Paso, Texas under Medicare
41
Advisory Board Project
Meeting with Dr. John Wennberg on the Dartmouth Atlas Projec t– Effective care – 12 percent of Medicare services– Preference sensitive care – 25 percent– Supply-sensitive care – 63 percent
42
Advisory Board Project
Meeting with Dr. John Wennberg on the Dartmouth Atlas Projec t– Effective care– Preference sensitive care– Supply-sensitive care
Dr. Brent James, Health Care Delivery Institute at the Intermountain Health Care System in Utah– Developing evidence to support the delivery of
effective care– A case study
43
Analysis of Complications Associated with Induced Labor Deliveries of Babies
Complication rates associated with timing– 6.66 percent of babies ended up in ICU at 37
weeks– 3.36 percent at 38 weeks– 2.47 percent at 39 weeks
Notified doctors, empowered nurses to change procedures
44
Percentage of Live Births by Elective Induction at Less than 39 Weeks Gestation at Intermountain Health Care System
45
C-section rates dropped from roughly one-third to 12 percent on first births and 20 percent overall.
C-Section Births in South Florida
Costs– C-sections cost between $11,000 and $30,000
per live birth– Normal deliveries cost between $5,000 and
$16,000
Rates– John Dorschner, “More S. Florida babies born by
an appointment,” The Miami Herald (May 10, 2009, Early Edition), Health and Medicine Section, Page 1.
46
The 2008 C-Section Rates in Miami
47
PercentageMiami-Dade
C-sectionsTotal births
c-sectionsCounty
Kendall Regional 1,534 2,180 70.4%Hialeah 871 1,657 52.6%South Miami 2,483 4,145 59.9%Baptist 2,221 4,416 50.3%Mercy 803 1,384 58.0%Mount Sinai 944 1,944 48.6%North Shore 847 2,016 42.0%Palmetto General 959 2,005 47.8%Homstead 758 1,522 49.8%Jackson Memorial 2,786 5,524 50.4%Jackson North 626 1,704 36.7%
Total 15,336 29,969 51.2%
Atul Gawande on McAllen and El Paso Medicare Treatment Patterns, 2001-2005
Critically ill patients received nearly 50 percent more specialists visits in McAllen
Were 2/3rds more likely to see 10 or more specialists in a six month period
Received– 20 percent more echocardiography tests– 200 percent more nerve conduction studies– 550 percent more urine flow studies– One-fifth to two-thirds more
Gallbladder operations Knee replacements Breast biopsies Bladder scopes
48
Atul Gawande on McAllen and El Paso Medicare Treatment Patterns, 2001-2005
Received– Two to three times as many
Pacemakers Implantable defibrillators Cardiac bypass operations Carotid endarterectomies Coronary-artery stents
The cost in McAllen was $15,000 per enrollee versus $7,500 in El Paso
There was no discernable difference in the outcomes in the two cities
49
Dr. Brent James of Intermountain Health System
50
“If health reform is just about expanding health insurance coverage without addressing the delivery issues in the current health care system, it will simply be pouring gasoline on an open flame.”
51
Conclusions
Conclusion
A 1 percentage point increase in health benefits costs today costs 2.25 times the amount of cash wages that it did in 1980
If we could cut health inflation back to 1990s levels, we would likely see 1990s wage growth rates
If we do not throttle back health inflation, median workers can expect long-run wage growth only about 40 percent of that in the 1990s
If health reform ramps up inflation, we could see wage losses over most of the earnings spectrum
Entitlement reform is a further risk and complication in assuring workers’ prosperity in the future
52
Outlook for the Future
If health inflation persists at recent rates, cash wages likely will not grow at rates that persisted during the 1990s even if health reform fails
Health care reform is a crucial consideration for the future prosperity of U.S. workers
We need to be careful about getting the cart (expanded coverage) in front of the horse (workers’ ability to pay and improve their living standards
The prospects for workers improving their standards of living and their ability to save for retirement hinge on the outcome in the current health care reform deliberations
53
54
Questions and Answers
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
??
? ?
? ?
?
?
Productivity Rewards and Pay Illusions with Benefit Cost Increases
Sylvester J. Schieber, Ph.D.
11th Annual RRC ConferenceIssues for Retirement Security10 August 2009Washington, DC