Post on 20-Feb-2020
transcript
Department of Child Services
Practice Indicator Reports
Published
For December 2011
December 2011
January 2012
Region 11
Data in the report (both historical and current) may be subject to change as it is continually being validated and updated. This may result in statistical data in previous reports to be inconsistent with statistics found in more recent reports even when the data pertain to the same time period.
This report uses data collected over a rolling three month period ending with the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use a rolling three month period ending with the historical month listed. Reports Taken – This section has data regarding the reports taken during the three month period ending with the report month.
Count – This is the total number of reports of abuse or neglect that are entered into ICWIS during the period ending with the report month.
Percent Resulting in Screen Outs – This is the percentage of reports that are screened out divided by the total reports taken during the period ending with the report month.
Assessments Substantiated – This section has data regarding the number of assessments with substantiated findings of abuse and/or neglect during the three month period ending with the report month.
Count – This is the total number of assessments with substantiated findings of abuse and/or neglect during the period ending with the report month.
Percent Resulting in Removal – This is the percentage of substantiated assessments during the period that resulted in removal of the child from the home by the end of the report month divided by the total number of substantiated assessments during the period ending with the report month.
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Initial Assessment - Use of Substitute Care
For December 2011
Report Description
January 05 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739
2
1,710 39.12% 188 14.89%
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Initial Assessment - Use of Substitute Care
Location Reports Taken
Percent Resulting in Screen Outs
For Oct 2011 to Dec 2011
Percent Resulting in Removal
CountCount
Assessments Substantiated
For Oct 2011 to Dec 2011
Statewide 35,268 38.3% 5,163 28.1%
Region 11
For December 2011
December 2011 Statewide Percent Removal Trend
Region 11 For December 2010 to December 2011
30.330.8 30.8
30.4 30.630.3
28.9
27.226.9
27.6
28.729.0
28.1
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
12-
'11
Percent Removal
Region 11 Percent Removal
Month Reports Taken
Percent Resulting in Screen Outs
For Oct 2011 to Dec 2011
Percent Resulting in Removal
CountCount
Assessments Substantiated
For Oct 2011 to Dec 2011 20.6
21.623.5
19.4 19.818.2
19.7
16.6
22.5
27.1 28.4
22.4
14.9
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
12-
'11
Percent Removal
Hamilton 609 42.9% 39 7.7%
Hancock 242 43.0% 24 8.3%
Madison 809 34.9% 115 16.5%
Tipton 50 44.0% 10 40.0%
Dec 2011 1,710 39.1% 188 14.9%
Nov 2011 1,813 37.8% 196 22.4%
Oct 2011 1,890 38.0% 243 28.4%
Sep 2011 1,863 37.3% 262 27.1%
Aug 2011 1,798 37.4% 253 22.5%
Jul 2011 1,813 37.4% 247 16.6%
Jun 2011 1,926 38.6% 234 19.7%
May 2011 2,073 39.9% 220 18.2%
Apr 2011 1,879 41.4% 212 19.8%
Mar 2011 1,781 40.1% 242 19.4%
Feb 2011 1,543 37.8% 268 23.5%
Jan 2011 1,727 36.9% 273 21.6%
Dec 2010 1,794 35.6% 281 20.6%
January 05 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 3
This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the end of the historical month listed. This report looks at CHINS children from CHINS cases that were open on the last day of the report month. It also collects where that child is located (in their own home or in substitute care). For the purpose of this report, a child with a non-custodial parent is considered “in home”. Total CHINS Count – This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the report month. CHINS – This section has data regarding all children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month.
In Home – This section has data regarding children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home. Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home divided by the total number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month.
Foster Care – This section has data regarding children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in out of home placement. Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in out of home placement. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in out of home placement divided by the total number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month.
Out of Home Placements – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in out of home placement.
Relative Homes – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed with relatives. Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed with relatives. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed with relatives divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.
Foster Homes – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in foster homes.
Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in foster homes. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in foster homes divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.
Residential – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in residential setting. Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in residential setting. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in residential setting divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.
Other – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in other placement settings. Example would be a court ordered unlicensed placement.
Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in other placement settings. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in other placement settings divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.
Report Description
DCS Practice Indicator Report
CHINS Placements by County
For December 2011
January 04 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 4
DCS Practice Indicator Report
For December 2011
CHINS Placements by County
Location Total CHINS
Foster Homes ResidentialIn Home Relative Home Other
Count % Count %Count % Count %
Region 11 432 192116 99 15 10316 31.3 60.8 4.7 3.2
Statewide 12627 43883840 3484 709 2068,787 39.6 49.9 8.1 2.3
Statewide Foster Care Placement Breakdown
Region 11 Foster Care Placement Breakdown
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
12-'1
001
-'11
02-'1
103
-'11
04-'1
105
-'11
06-'1
107
-'11
08-'1
109
-'11
10-'1
111
-'11
12-'1
1
Relative Foster Home Residential Other
Foster Care
Out of Home Placements
%
26.9
30.4
%
73.1
69.6
Count Count Count
CHINS
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
12-'1
001
-'11
02-'1
103
-'11
04-'1
105
-'11
06-'1
107
-'11
08-'1
109
-'11
10-'1
111
-'11
12-'1
1
Relative Foster Home Residential Other
December 2011
Region 11 For December 2010 to December 2011
Month Total CHINS
Foster Homes ResidentialIn Home Relative Home Other
Count % Count %Count % Count %
Foster Care
Out of Home Placements
% %Count Count Count
CHINS
Hamilton 88 4221 22 2 123.9 32.8 62.7 3.0 1.567 76.1
Hancock 44 1919 4 0 243.2 16.0 76.0 0.0 8.025 56.8
Madison 281 12471 66 13 725.3 31.4 59.0 6.2 3.3210 74.7
Tipton 19 75 7 0 026.3 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.014 73.7
Dec 2011 432 192116 99 15 1026.9 31.3 60.8 4.7 3.2316 73.1
Nov 2011 441 206114 100 17 425.9 30.6 63.0 5.2 1.2327 74.1
Oct 2011 449 199120 104 19 726.7 31.6 60.5 5.8 2.1329 73.3
Sep 2011 485 205148 105 21 630.5 31.2 60.8 6.2 1.8337 69.5
Aug 2011 476 209128 112 21 626.9 32.2 60.1 6.0 1.7348 73.1
Jul 2011 502 210138 126 23 527.5 34.6 57.7 6.3 1.4364 72.5
Jun 2011 499 223117 124 26 923.4 32.5 58.4 6.8 2.4382 76.6
May 2011 515 218131 130 30 625.4 33.9 56.8 7.8 1.6384 74.6
Apr 2011 507 212120 137 32 623.7 35.4 54.8 8.3 1.6387 76.3
Mar 2011 512 204131 135 34 825.6 35.4 53.5 8.9 2.1381 74.4
Feb 2011 530 207143 137 37 627.0 35.4 53.5 9.6 1.6387 73.0
Jan 2011 547 193166 142 41 530.3 37.3 50.7 10.8 1.3381 69.7
Dec 2010 557 214162 136 40 529.1 34.4 54.2 10.1 1.3395 70.9
January 04 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 5
This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the end of the historical month listed. This report looks at CHINS children from CHINS cases that were open on the last day of the report month. It also collects where that child is located (in their own home or in substitute care). For the purpose of this report, children with non-custodial parents are considered to be in
their own home. IA Count – This is the number of children that have an open Informal Adjustment case on the last day of the report month. Total CHINS Count – This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the report month. IA and In Home – This section has data regarding children that have an open IA case or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home.
Count- This is the number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home.
Percent- This is the number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home divided by the total number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month.
IA, In Home or Relative Care – This section has data regarding children that have an open IA case or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home or in relative care.
Count- This is the number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home or in relative care.
Percent- This is the number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home or in relative care divided by the total number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month. Target (At or Above) % – The target for the percent of the number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home or in relative care to the total number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month is 50% or higher.
Non Relative Foster Care – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are not in their own home or in relative care.
Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are not in their own home or in relative care.
Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are not in their own home or in relative care divided by the total number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month. Target (At or below) % – The target for the percent of the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are not in their own home or in relative care to the total number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month is 50% or higher.
Report Description
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Safely Home Families First by County
December 2011
January 04 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 6
Region 11 432 284 217
Statewide 12627 9127 5,303
Statewide Foster Care Placement Breakdown
Region 11 Foster Care Placement Breakdown
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
12-'1
001
-'11
02-'1
103
-'11
04-'1
105
-'11
06-'1
107
-'11
08-'1
109
-'11
10-'1
111
-'11
12-'1
1
In Home or Relative Foster Care Target
56.7%
63.3%
43.3%
36.7%
December 2011
Region 11 For December 2010 to December 2011
DCS Practice Indicator Report
For December 2011
Safely Home Families First by County
50%
50%
50%
50%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
12-'1
001
-'11
02-'1
103
-'11
04-'1
105
-'11
06-'1
107
-'11
08-'1
109
-'11
10-'1
111
-'11
12-'1
1
In Home or Relative Foster Care Target
69
1803
Location Total CHINS
Non-Relative Foster Care
% %Count Count Count
IA, In Home CHINS, and Relative Care
Target (At or
Above) %
Target (At or Below)
%
IA
Count %Count
IA and In Home CHINS
185
5643
36.9%
39.1%
Location Total CHINS
Non-Relative Foster Care
% %Count Count Count
IA, In Home CHINS, and Relative Care
Target (At or
Above) %
Target (At or Below)
%
IA
Count %Count
IA and In Home CHINS
Hamilton 88 46 4550.5% 50%50% 49.5%3 24 26.4%
Hancock 44 44 2167.7% 50%50% 32.3%21 40 61.5%
Madison 281 175 14454.9% 50%50% 45.1%38 109 34.2%
Tipton 19 19 773.1% 50%50% 26.9%7 12 46.2%
December 2011 432 284 21756.7% 50%50% 43.3%69 185 36.9%
November 2011 441 292 22756.3% 50%50% 43.7%78 192 37.0%
October 2011 449 299 22557.1% 50%50% 42.9%75 195 37.2%
September 201 485 327 23258.5% 50%50% 41.5%74 222 39.7%
August 2011 476 323 23657.8% 50%50% 42.2%83 211 37.7%
July 2011 502 342 23859.0% 50%50% 41.0%78 216 37.2%
June 2011 499 321 25855.4% 50%50% 44.6%80 197 34.0%
May 2011 515 339 25457.2% 50%50% 42.8%78 209 35.2%
April 2011 507 332 25057.0% 50%50% 43.0%75 195 33.5%
March 2011 512 345 24658.4% 50%50% 41.6%79 210 35.5%
February 2011 530 364 25059.3% 50%50% 40.7%84 227 37.0%
January 2011 547 394 23962.2% 50%50% 37.8%86 252 39.8%
December 2010 557 381 25959.5% 50%50% 40.5%83 245 38.3%
January 04 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 7
This report uses data collected over at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the historical month listed. For the purpose of this report, children with their non-custodial parents are considered to be in their own home. Total Out of Home Placements – This is the total number of CHINS children that are in out of home placement on the last day of the report month. Placed in Same County – This is the total number of CHINS children that are placed in the same county as the county of their case. Percent Locally Placed – This is the percentage of CHINS children that are placed in the same county as the county of their case divided by the total number of CHINS children which are in out of home placement on the last day of the report month.
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Locally Placed CHINS
For December 2011
Report Description
January 03 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739
8
Locally Placed CHINS
DCS Practice Indicator Report
For December 2011
316 163 51.6%
Location Total Out of Home
Placements
Placed in Same County
Percent Locally Placed
Statewide 8,787 6,214 70.7%
Region 11
December 2011
Region 11 For December 2010 to December 2011
71.8
71.0
71.5
71.1 71.1
71.3 71.2
70.7
70.9
70.6 70.670.7
70.7
69.8
70
70.2
70.4
70.6
70.8
71
71.2
71.4
71.6
71.8
72
Dec
'10
Jan
'11
Feb '1
1M
ar '1
1A
pr '1
1M
ay '1
1Ju
n '11
Jul '
11A
ug '11
Sep
'11
Oct
'11
Nov '1
1D
ec '1
1
Statewide Percent Placed Locally
Region 11 Percent Placed Locally
58.0
53.3
56.655.9
57.1
55.7
53.7
51.150.6 50.7 50.8
52.6
51.6
46
48
50
52
54
56
58
60D
ec '1
0Ja
n '1
1Feb
'11
Mar
'11
Apr
'11
May
'11
Jun '1
1Ju
l '11
Aug '1
1S
ep '1
1O
ct '1
1N
ov '11
Dec
'11
Month Total Out of Home
Placements
Placed in Same County
Percent Locally Placed
67 39 58.2%Hamilton
25 10 40.0%Hancock
210 106 50.5%Madison
14 8 57.1%Tipton
316 163 51.6%Dec 2011
327 172 52.6%Nov 2011
329 167 50.8%Oct 2011
337 171 50.7%Sep 2011
348 176 50.6%Aug 2011
364 186 51.1%Jul 2011
382 205 53.7%Jun 2011
384 214 55.7%May 2011
387 221 57.1%Apr 2011
381 213 55.9%Mar 2011
387 219 56.6%Feb 2011
381 203 53.3%Jan 2011
395 229 58.0%Dec 2010
January 03 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 9
This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the historical month listed. Average Number of Placements Per Child – This is the total number of out of home placements for each CHINS child in out of home placement on the last day of the report month. This includes all placements during the current removal episode. If a child had at least one placement end in the first 8 days from removal, then that child's number of placements was reduced by one. This number is divided by the total number CHINS children who are in out of home placement on the last day of the report month.
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Average Number of Placements
For December 2011
Report Description
January 03 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 10
Location Average Number of
Placements Per Child
DCS Practice Indicator Report
For December 2010 to December 2011
Average Number of Placements
Statewide Average Number of Placements
2.49
2.5
2.51
2.52
2.53
2.54
2.55
2.56
2.57
2.58
2.59
2.6
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
12-
'11
Average Placements
December 2011
Region 11 For December 2010 to December 2011 Region 11 Average Number of Placements
2.5
Statewide 2.6
Region 11
Month Average Number of Placements Per
Child
2
2.05
2.1
2.15
2.2
2.25
2.3
2.35
2.4
2.45
2.5
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
12-
'11
Average Placements
2.1Hamilton
2.6Hancock
2.6Madison
1.6Tipton
2.5December 2011
2.4November 2011
2.5October 2011
2.4September 2011
2.4August 2011
2.3July 2011
2.3June 2011
2.3May 2011
2.3April 2011
2.3March 2011
2.3February 2011
2.2January 2011
2.2December 2010
January 03 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 11
This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the end of the historical month listed. For the purpose of this report, children with a non-custodial parent are considered to be in their own home. Count of Sibling Cases – This is the number of open cases as of the end of the report month which have more than one child in out of home placement at the end of the report month. Cases With All Children Placed Together – This is the number of cases with more than one child in out of home placement where all of the children are placed in the same resource with the same resource ID. Percent Placed Together of Sibling Cases– This is the percentage of the number of cases where all of the children in out of home placement are placed together divided by the number of open cases with more than one child in out of home placement as of the end of the report month. Average Number of Children per Case – This number takes the number of children in out of home placement from cases with more than one child in out of home placement and divides it by the number of cases with more than one child in out of home placement as of the end of the report month.
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Sibling Placement Report
For December 2011
Report Description
January 03 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739
12
December 2011
Region 11 For December 2010 to December 2011
Location Count of Sibling Cases
Cases With All Children Placed
Together
Average Number of Children per
Case
Percent Placed Together of
Sibling Cases
82 67 2.6581.7%
Statewide 2175 1623 2.7074.6%
Region 1170.6 70.7
71.671.9 71.9 71.9
72.7
73.6 73.7 73.673.2
74.1 74.6
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
12-
'11
Percent Together
Statewide Percent Together
Region 11 Percent Together
DCS Practice Indicator Report
December 2011
Sibling Placement Report
74.275.0
76.076.8
76.076.8
80.8 80.6 80.7 81.2 81.2
82.481.7
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
12-
'11
Percent Together
Month Count of Sibling Cases
Cases With All Children Placed
Together
Average Number of Children per
Case
Percent Placed Together of
Sibling Cases
Hamilton 19 15 2.5878.9%
Hancock 6 6 2.83100.0%
Madison 53 42 2.6879.2%
Tipton 4 4 2.25100.0%
December 2011 82 67 2.6581.7%
November 2011 85 70 2.5982.4%
October 2011 85 69 2.6081.2%
September 2011 85 69 2.6081.2%
August 2011 88 71 2.5980.7%
July 2011 93 75 2.6280.6%
June 2011 99 80 2.6180.8%
May 2011 99 76 2.6176.8%
April 2011 100 76 2.5976.0%
March 2011 99 76 2.5576.8%
February 2011 100 76 2.5576.0%
January 2011 96 72 2.5175.0%
December 2010 97 72 2.6074.2%
January 03 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 13
This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the end of the historical month listed. This report looks at CHINS children that were in out of home placement at the end of the month. It measures the number of days since the child was last removed from its home. One Year - 0 to 365 Days– This is column shows data for CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 0 and 365 days since the child’s last removal.
Count- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 0 and 365 days since the child’s last removal. Percent- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 0 and 365 days since the child’s last removal divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.
One Year - 366 to 730 Days– This is column shows data for CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 366 and 730 days since the child’s last removal.
Count- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 366 and 730 days since the child’s last removal. Percent- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 366 and 730 days since the child’s last removal divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.
One Year - 731 to 1095 Days– This is column shows data for CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 731 to 1095 days since the child’s last removal.
Count- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 731 to 1095 days since the child’s last removal. Percent- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 731 to 1095 days since the child’s last removal divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.
One Year - 1096 Days+– This is column shows data for CHINS children that have been in out of home placement 1096 days or more since the child’s last removal.
Count- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement 1096 days or more since the child’s last removal. Percent- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement 1096 days or more since the child’s last removal divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.
Length Per Child – This column shows data for length of time of CHINS children who were in out of home placement at the end of the report month have been in out of home placement since the child’s last removal from their home.
Average- This column calculates the average or “mean” length of time in out of home placement since the last removal per child in out of home placement at the end of the report month. Median- This column calculates the median length of time in out of home placement since the last removal per child in out of home placement at the end of the report month.
Report Description
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Length of Stay in Out of Home PlacementChildren in Out of Home Placement by Length of Time Since Latest Removal
For December 2011
January 03 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739
14
115 100 48 5336.4% 31.6% 15.2% 16.8% 656.2
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Length of Stay in Out of Home PlacementChildren in Out of Home Placement by Length of Time Since Latest Removal
Location One Year0 to 365 Days
Two Years366 to 730 Days
Three Years731 to 1095 Days
Three + Years1096 Days+
Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent
For December 2011
Average Median
Length Per Child
December 2011
Region 11 For December 2010 to December 2011
Statewide Median Length
Region 11 Median Length
4,116 2,108 1,111 1,45246.8% 24.0% 12.6% 16.5% 638.3Statewide 416.5
Region 11 527.0403
398402 402
409
414 415
424426 425
429 428
417
380
385
390
395
400
405
410
415
420
425
430
435
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
12-
'11
Median
415390 398
421 441 452 436 450 461 476507 512 527
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
12-
'11
Median
Month One Year0 to 365 Days
Two Years366 to 730 Days
Three Years731 to 1095 Days
Three + Years1096 Days+
Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Average Median
Length Per Child
35 22 4 652.2% 32.8% 6.0% 9.0% 510.3Hamilton 327.6
2 14 7 28.0% 56.0% 28.0% 8.0% 702.1Hancock 669.5
72 59 34 4534.3% 28.1% 16.2% 21.4% 713.8Madison 568.0
6 5 3 042.9% 35.7% 21.4% 0.0% 409.5Tipton 388.0
115 100 48 5336.4% 31.6% 15.2% 16.8% 656.2December 2011 527.0
119 100 54 5436.4% 30.6% 16.5% 16.5% 644.0November 2011 511.5
122 102 55 5037.1% 31.0% 16.7% 15.2% 646.8October 2011 507.4
133 95 59 5039.5% 28.2% 17.5% 14.8% 626.1September 2011 476.4
133 105 56 5438.2% 30.2% 16.1% 15.5% 630.0August 2011 461.0
145 103 64 5239.8% 28.3% 17.6% 14.3% 627.7July 2011 449.5
150 117 62 5339.3% 30.6% 16.2% 13.9% 616.9June 2011 436.0
155 113 60 5640.4% 29.4% 15.6% 14.6% 633.0May 2011 452.0
157 122 51 5740.6% 31.5% 13.2% 14.7% 624.8April 2011 440.6
163 114 48 5642.8% 29.9% 12.6% 14.7% 615.7March 2011 421.4
177 107 48 5545.7% 27.6% 12.4% 14.2% 587.9February 2011 397.6
185 96 44 5648.6% 25.2% 11.5% 14.7% 581.0January 2011 389.6
191 106 44 5448.4% 26.8% 11.1% 13.7% 562.5December 2010 415.4
January 03 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 15
This report uses CHINS and IA case types that have case type status end date occurring during the month. It then groups these cases using the closure reasons codes into categories of closure reasons. Case with closure reason code “Case opened in error – disregard” are filtered out for the purpose of this report. This report uses the reason codes selected by the worker at the date of case closure. Adoption closure reasons will not match the number of actual finalized adoptions reported from the hearing information fields in ICWIS/MaGik. Closure Reasons are group by:
Description Category Description Category
Child Reunited with Parents Reunification Case closed; AG case created Guardianship
Child never Removed from own home, wardship terminated
Reunification Child placed with relatives Relative
Extended wardship terminated (on court order for age 18 to 21)
Emancipation Child Placed with Legal guardian Guardianship
Child Returned to Primary Home Reunification Child Reached Age of Majority (age 18) Emancipation
Period of IA ended code used for Informal Adjustment cases only
Reunification Emancipated Court Ordered (age 18) Emancipation
Child Adoption Finalized Adoption Child Already Reunited with parent (s) when wardship terminated
Reunification
The Permanency column “Total” refers to the total case with reason codes in the Reunification, Adoption, Relative, Guardianship, and Emancipation categories. The Permanency column “Total within 24 months” refers to the total case that ended within 24 month of the case status type begin date in the Reunification, Adoption, Relative, Guardianship, and Emancipation categories.
DCS Practice Indicator Report
CHINS and IA Permanency Report
For December 2011
Report Description
January 05 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739
16
DCS Practice Indicator Report
CHINS and IA Permanency Report
For December 2011
Statewide Permanency within 24 Months
Region 11 Permanency within 24 Months
Statewide
Region 11
82.986.1 88.4 87.0 85.5 83.7 85.1 85.1 82.8
80.0 82.1 81.7
68.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
12-
'11
490 283 15 40 27
23 8 1 1 0
Location
Reunification Adoption Relative Guardianship Emanicipation
855
33
Total
Closed Cases Types with Permanency Outcomes
68.4
63.6
24 Month Rate
585
21
Within 24 Months
Permanency
December 2011
Region 11 For December 2010 to December 2011
Location
Reunification Adoption Relative Guardianship EmanicipationTotal
Closed Cases Types with Permanency Outcomes
24 Month Rate
Within 24 Months
Permanency
83.3
92.196.0 93.3
88.5
80.8 81.586.2
79.1
65.6
75.0
84.6
63.6
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
12-
'11
Hamilton 1 3 0 0 0 4 25.01
Hancock 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA0
Madison 18 5 1 1 0 25 76.019
Tipton 4 0 0 0 0 4 25.01
Dec 2011 23 8 1 1 0 33 63.621
Nov 2011 17 6 0 2 1 26 84.622
Oct 2011 26 6 0 0 0 32 75.024
Sep 2011 20 10 0 2 0 32 65.621
Aug 2011 27 6 0 8 2 43 79.134
Jul 2011 22 3 0 4 0 29 86.225
Jun 2011 23 2 1 0 1 27 81.522
May 2011 18 5 0 1 2 26 80.821
Apr 2011 22 4 0 0 0 26 88.523
Mar 2011 22 2 0 4 2 30 93.328
Feb 2011 24 0 0 1 0 25 96.024
Jan 2011 33 1 0 4 0 38 92.135
Dec 2010 17 3 0 3 1 24 83.320
January 05 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 17
This report uses data collected over at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the historical month listed. For the purpose of this report, a person is considered family for the child if they have the following relationships:
• Father
• Mother
• Stepfather
• Stepmother
• Grandfather
• Grandmother
• Pre-adoptive father
• Pre-adoptive mother
• Adoptive grandparent
• Legal Guardian Children Out of Home Entire Month – This column shows the number of children in out of home placement at the end of the report month who also have a removal date prior to the first of the report month. Contact Information – This section of the reports shows information regarding FCM contacts (from the contact screens) during the report month. FCM with Family – This section of the report shows FCM contacts with the child’s family (as described above) during the report month.
Children – This is the total number of children that the FCM had at least one contact with a member of the child’s family during the report month. Rate – This is the total number of children that FCM had at least one contact with a member of the child’s family divided by the total number of children in out of home placement for the entire month (as described above).
FCM with Child – This section of the report shows FCM contacts with the child during the report month.
Children – This is the total number of children that the FCM had at least one contact with a the child during the report month. Rate – This is the total number of children that FCM had at least one contact with the child divided by the total number of children in out of home placement for the entire month (as described above).
FCM with Family and Child – This section of the report shows FCM contacts with the child’s family (as described above) AND the child during the report month. Contact with both had to have occurred for the child to be included in this section. The family and child do not need to present at the same contact, contact with each could have been made in two separate contacts.
Children – This is the total number of children that the FCM had at least one contact with a member of the child’s family and at least one contact with the child during the report month. Rate – This is the total number of children that FCM had at least one contact with a member of the child’s family and at least one contact with the child during the report month divided by the total number of children in out of home placement for the entire month (as described above).
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Family Case Manager Contacts Report
For December 2011
Report Description
January 03 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739
18
DCS Practice Indicator Report
For December 2011
Family Case Manager Contacts Report
Location
Children
Statewide Child Contact Rate
Region 11 Child Contact Rate
December 2011
Region 11 For December 2010 to December 2011
308 81 26.3%
Statewide
Region 11
98.798.1
92.6
99.7
97.197.8
99.5
96.0
98.5
96.7
98.2
95.696.4
88.0
90.0
92.0
94.0
96.0
98.0
100.0
102.0
Dec
'10
Jan
'11
Feb '1
1M
ar '1
1A
pr '1
1M
ay '1
1Ju
n '11
Jul '
11A
ug '11
Sep
'11
Oct
'11
Nov '1
1D
ec '1
1
Child Contact
Contact Information
FCM with Family
Rate Children
FCM with Child
Rate Children
FCM with Family and Child
Rate
Children out
of home entire month
78 25.3%297 96.4%
8,437 2,282 27.0% 2,232 26.5%8,187 97.0%
Month
Children
Contact Information
FCM with Family
Rate Children
FCM with Child
Rate Children
FCM with Family and Child
Rate
Children out of home entire
month
97.497.5
97.3
98.1
97.2
96.9
98.2
96.7
97.8
97.4
97.196.9
97.0
96.0
96.5
97.0
97.5
98.0
98.5
Dec
'10
Jan
'11
Feb '1
1M
ar '1
1A
pr '1
1M
ay '1
1Ju
n '11
Jul '
11A
ug '11
Sep
'11
Oct
'11
Nov '1
1D
ec '1
1
Child Contact
65 9 13.8%Hamilton 6 9.2%62 95.4%
25 7 28.0%Hancock 7 28.0%25 100.0%
206 59 28.6%Madison 59 28.6%198 96.1%
12 6 50.0%Tipton 6 50.0%12 100.0%
308 81 26.3%Dec 2011 78 25.3%297 96.4%
317 74 23.3%Nov 2011 73 23.0%303 95.6%
327 100 30.6%Oct 2011 99 30.3%321 98.2%
329 99 30.1%Sep 2011 99 30.1%318 96.7%
328 103 31.4%Aug 2011 103 31.4%323 98.5%
352 93 26.4%Jul 2011 90 25.6%338 96.0%
370 115 31.1%Jun 2011 114 30.8%368 99.5%
368 109 29.6%May 2011 106 28.8%360 97.8%
383 136 35.5%Apr 2011 131 34.2%372 97.1%
374 128 34.2%Mar 2011 127 34.0%373 99.7%
376 103 27.4%Feb 2011 103 27.4%348 92.6%
367 84 22.9%Jan 2011 84 22.9%360 98.1%
385 116 30.1%Dec 2010 115 29.9%380 98.7%
January 03 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 19
This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the historical month listed. For the purpose of this report, a person is considered family for the child if they have the following relationships:
• Father
• Mother
• Stepfather
• Stepmother
• Grandfather
• Grandmother
• Pre-adoptive father
• Pre-adoptive mother
• Adoptive grandparent
• Legal Guardian Children out of home with case plan goal of reunification – This column shows the number of children in out of home placement at the end of the report month who also have reunification as the most recently entered primary case plan goal. Children with visits to their family during the month – This section of the report shows data regarding children who have had a visit with the child’s family (as described above) begin during the report month.
Children – This is the total number of children that the child had at least one visit with a member of the child’s family during the report month. Rate – This is the total number of children that the child had at least one visit with a member of the child’s family divided by the total number of children in out of home placement at the end of the report month with case plan goal of reunification(as described above).
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Child Visitation Report
For December 2011
Report Description
January 03 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739
20
DCS Practice Indicator Report
For December 2011
Child Visitation Report
Location
Children
Statewide Visitation Rate
Region 11 Visitation Rate
December 2011
Region 11 For December 2010 to December 2011
177 23 13.0%
Statewide
Region 11
9.410.7
9.411.4
15.1 14.9
19.5 18.7
23.821.6
17.4
15.113.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0D
ec '1
0Ja
n '1
1Feb
'11
Mar
'11
Apr
'11
May
'11
Jun '1
1
Jul '
11A
ug '11
Sep
'11
Oct
'11
Nov '1
1D
ec '1
1
Visit Rate
Children with visits to
their family during the month
Rate
Children out of home
with case plan goal of reunification
4,771 1,024 21.5%
Month
21.523.6
25.1
27.626.3
22.824.1
25.927.0 26.9
25.1
21.1 21.5
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
Dec
'10
Jan
'11
Feb '1
1M
ar '1
1A
pr '1
1M
ay '1
1Ju
n '11
Jul '
11A
ug '11
Sep
'11
Oct
'11
Nov '1
1D
ec '1
1
Visit Rate
Children
Chidlren with visits to their family during the
month
Rate
Children out of home with case plan goal of
reunification
Hamilton 48 0 0.0%
Hancock 9 0 0.0%
Madison 115 19 16.5%
Tipton 5 4 80.0%
Dec 2011 177 23 13.0%
Nov 2011 179 27 15.1%
Oct 2011 184 32 17.4%
Sep 2011 176 38 21.6%
Aug 2011 172 41 23.8%
Jul 2011 187 35 18.7%
Jun 2011 205 40 19.5%
May 2011 201 30 14.9%
Apr 2011 225 34 15.1%
Mar 2011 219 25 11.4%
Feb 2011 234 22 9.4%
Jan 2011 234 25 10.7%
Dec 2010 235 22 9.4%
January 03 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 21
This is a description of the key elements used in this report.
Time Period – The time period used in this report is the 12 months prior to the month of the report.
Assessments during time period – The assessment used in this report are assessment with BOTH report date AND approval date during the time period (12
months prior to the month of the report).
Victim Selection – The children used in this report were identified as having at least one substantiated allegation of abuse or neglect on an assessment during the time period.
First Occurrence – This looks at the victims of substantiated abuse or neglect during the first 6 months of the time period (6 to 12 months prior to the month of the
report). If a child was a victim in multiple assessments with substantiated abuse or neglect, the assessment with the earliest report date is considered the first occurrence.
Recurrence Time Period – The time period used to see if a child is a substantiated victim in a recurring assessment of abuse or neglect is based off the report
date of the first occurrence. The recurrence period begins one day after the first occurrence report date and ends 183 after the first occurrence report date (>= 1st
Occurrence +1 and <= 1st Occurrence +183). If a child has multiple recurrences, the earliest report date in the recurring time period is considered the recurring
assessment.
Here is a visual representation of an example. This is a report for December of a given year. The time period to review assessments would run from Jan 1st to
Dec 31st. The time period for a first occurrence would be Jan 1
s t to Jun 30
th. If a child had a first occurrence on Feb 7
th, the recurrence period would run from Feb
8th to Aug 9
th. If the child had a recurrence in Aug 5
th, that would be considered repeat maltreatment. If the child had a recurrence Oct 10
th, that would not be
considered repeat maltreatment because it fell outside the recurrence period.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Time Period (Jan 1st to Dec 31
st)
1st Occurrence Time Period (Jan 1
st to Jun 30
th)
Recurrence Period (Feb 8th
to Aug 9th)
Percent of absence of repeat maltreatment – This calculation uses the terms defined above. The numerator is the number of children with a first occurrence minus the number of children with a recurrence. The denominator is the number of children with first occurrence.
(1st Occurrence – Recurrence)
1st Occurrence
For the purposes of this report, the county the child is assigned to is based off the county of first occurrence. If a child has a recurrence in a different county, the repeat will show for the county of the first occurrence.
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Absence of Repeat Maltreatment
For December 2011
Report Description
January 05 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739
22
416 388 93.27%
10,162 9,375 92.26%Statewide
Region 11
Statewide Absence of Repeat Maltreatment
Region 11 Absence of Repeat Maltreatment
92.1
0
92.2
4
92.3
7
92.4
8
92.8
1
93.0
5
93.4
1
93.4
6 92.9
1
92.5
7
92.4
4
92.1
6
92.2
6
90.50
91.00
91.50
92.00
92.50
93.00
93.50
94.00
94.50
95.00
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
12-
'11
Absence of Repeat Maltreatment Standard
County Absence of Repeat
Maltreatment Percent
Victims from Jan 2011 to Jul
2011
Victims without a recurrence within 6
months
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Absence of Repeat Maltreatment
For December 2011
December 2011
Region 11 For December 2010 to December 2011
County Victims from Jan 2011 to Jul
2011
Absence of Repeat
Maltreatment Percent
Victims without a recurrence within 6
months
90.2
7
90.1
0
89.8
1
90.5
0
90.9
4
92.4
2
93.6
6
94.1
2
93.1
5 91.9
3
92.2
9
92.2
0
93.2
7
87.00
88.00
89.00
90.00
91.00
92.00
93.00
94.00
95.00
12-
'10
01-
'11
02-
'11
03-
'11
04-
'11
05-
'11
06-
'11
07-
'11
08-
'11
09-
'11
10-
'11
11-
'11
12-
'11
Absence of Repeat Maltreatment Standard
94.60%
94.60%
National Standard
National Standard
115 105 91.30%Hamilton 94.60%
75 71 94.67%Hancock 94.60%
201 189 94.03%Madison 94.60%
25 23 92.00%Tipton 94.60%
416 388 93.27%December 2011 94.60%
423 390 92.20%November 2011 94.60%
415 383 92.29%October 2011 94.60%
409 376 91.93%September 2011 94.60%
438 408 93.15%August 2011 94.60%
493 464 94.12%July 2011 94.60%
473 443 93.66%June 2011 94.60%
475 439 92.42%May 2011 94.60%
508 462 90.94%April 2011 94.60%
516 467 90.50%March 2011 94.60%
520 467 89.81%February 2011 94.60%
515 464 90.10%January 2011 94.60%
524 473 90.27%December 2010 94.60%
January 05 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 23
This is a description of the key elements used in this report.
Time Period – The time period used in this report is the 12 months prior to the month of the report.
Assessments during the time period – The assessment used in this report are assessment with BOTH report date AND approval date during the time
period (12 months prior to the month of the report).
Victim of maltreatment in Foster Care – The children used in this report were identified as having at least one substantiated allegation of abuse or neglect on an assessment during the time period where the perpetrator is a foster parent or institutional staff.
Children in Foster Care during the time period – All CHINS children with an open removal episode at any time during the 12 months prior to the month
of the report. Also included are Probation children (who are IV-E eligible) with an open removal episode at any time during the 12 months prior to the month of the report.
Percent of absence of maltreatment – This calculation uses the terms defined above. The numerator is the number of children in foster care minus the
number of victims of maltreatment in foster care. The denominator is the number of children in foster care.
(Children in Foster Care – Victims of maltreatment in Foster Care) Children in Foster Care
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Absence of Maltreatment in Foster Care
For December 2011
Report Description
January 05 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739
24
19,709 35 99.82%Statewide
Region 11 698 1 99.86%
Statewide Trend of Absence of Maltreatment in Foster Care
99.6
4
99.6
7
99.6
9
99.7
0
99.7
1
99.7
0
99.7
4
99.7
4
99.7
7
99.7
6
99.7
8
99.8
1
99.8
2
99.4
99.5
99.6
99.7
99.8
99.9
100
12- '
1001
- '11
02- '
1103
- '11
04- '
1105
- '11
06- '
1107
- '11
08- '
1109
- '11
10- '
1111
- '11
12- '
11
Maltreatment Standard
Region 11 Trend of Absence of Maltreatment in Foster Care
Location Absence of Maltreatment
Percent
For December 2011
Children in Foster Care
from Jan 2011 to Dec 2011
Substantiated Victims in Foster
Care
Region 11 for December 2010 to December 2011
Month Children in Foster Care
from Jan 2011 to Dec 2011
Substantiated Victims in Foster
Care
National Standard
99.68%
Absence of Maltreatment
Percent
National Standard
99.68%
DCS Practice Indicator Report
Absence of Maltreatment in Foster Care
For December 2011
99.7
6
99.7
6
99.7
6
99.7
5
99.7
5
99.7
5
99.8
7
99.7
4
99.7
4
99.8
7
99.8
6
99.8
6
99.8
6
99.5
99.55
99.6
99.65
99.7
99.75
99.8
99.85
99.9
99.95
100
12- '
1001
- '11
02- '
1103
- '11
04- '
1105
- '11
06- '
1107
- '11
08- '
1109
- '11
10- '
1111
- '11
12- '
11
Maltreatment Standard
Hamilton 139 0 100.00% 99.68%
Hancock 84 0 100.00% 99.68%
Madison 435 1 99.77% 99.68%
Tipton 40 0 100.00% 99.68%
December 2011 698 1 99.86% 99.68%
November 2011 719 1 99.86% 99.68%
October 2011 738 1 99.86% 99.68%
September 2011 753 1 99.87% 99.68%
August 2011 765 2 99.74% 99.68%
July 2011 780 2 99.74% 99.68%
June 2011 790 1 99.87% 99.68%
May 2011 796 2 99.75% 99.68%
April 2011 791 2 99.75% 99.68%
March 2011 809 2 99.75% 99.68%
February 2011 818 2 99.76% 99.68%
January 2011 827 2 99.76% 99.68%
December 2010 833 2 99.76% 99.68%
January 05 2012
Prepared by
Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis
Source:
ICWIS Monthly Data
State of Indiana
Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director
302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 25