Post on 22-Aug-2020
transcript
41018NWTO18 2. 6952 GREENLAW010
REPORT ON GROUND MAGNETOMETER
AND V.L.F. SURVEYS
SYLVANITE PROJECT
GREENLAW TOWNSHIP
NORTHERN ONTARIO
BRIAN GROVES
NORANDA EXPLORATION CO. LTD.
TIMMINS, ONTARIO
JULY 10, 1984
41016NWM18 2 .6953 GREENLAW 010C
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1. Introduction 2
2. Location and Access 2
3. Survey Specifications 3
4. Data Presentation 4
5. Discussion of Results 4
a) Magnetometer Data 5
b) V.L.F. Data 5
6. Conclusions 6
LIST OF MAPS
Map l Magnetometer Data
Map 2 V.L.F. Data
-2-
1. INTRODUCTION;
During the period, December 17-19th, 1983, ground magnetometer and
very low frequency (V.L.F.) E.M. surveys were performed by
Services Exploration of Rouyn, Quebec for Noranda Exploration
Company Ltd.
2. LOCATION AND ACCESS:
This report covers the results of surveys over six claims in
Greenlaw Township. The claims are: P-722790 to P-722792
inclusive and P-722864 to P-722866 inclusive. These two non
contiguous groups of claims are a portion of a much larger survey
area encompassing adjoining patented claims. Claims P-722864 to
P-722866 are water claims and cover the south-eastern end of
Hotstone Lake and a smaller adjoining lake to the southwest.
The claims are located in the central portion of Greenlaw
Township, approximately 50 km southeast of the town of chapleau.
Access is afforded from Chapleau by Highway 101 south to Highway
129. Twenty km from the intersection of the two highways is an
acess road leading in a southeasterly direction for approximately
30 km to a secondary road leading to Kormack station on the
Canadian National Railway line. A bush road leads to the property
from the railway crossing.
S-3S343 \ S-3SJ44
NORANDA EXPLORATION CO. LTD.
SYLVANITE PROJECT
Property PlanPatentee Claims
Kirkland Resources Inc.
O 500m
Da!e : February 1984 Fig.
-3-
3. SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS;
The magnetometer and V.L.F. surveys were performed along northerly
oriented grid lines spaced 50 metres apart. Station spacings
along the grid lines for both surveys were 12.5 metres.
A Geometrics G-816 proton precession magnetometer was employed to
measure the earth's total magnetic field with an accuracy of INT.
A Scintrex MP-3 micro-processor controlled proton precession
magnetometer was employed as a dedicated base station magnetometer
throughout the survey. The diurnal variation of the earth's
magnetic field was monitored by the MP-3 and corrections applied
to the field readings as a function of time of reading.
A Geonics EM-16 V.L.F. instrument was employed for the survey.
The in-phase and quadrature components of the vertical secondary
field were measured with an accuracy of l *. The transmitting
station utilized for the survey was NAA {Cutler, Maine) operating
at a frequency of 17.8 kHz.
A total of 9.15 line km of magnetometer surveying V.L.F. surveying
was completed over the claims.
4. DATA PRESENTATION:
The magnetic field data are presented in contoured plan form in
Map~l. A contour interval of 200nT has been employed and no
filtering has been performed on the data.
-4-
4. DATA PRESENTATION! ( cont'd)
The V.L.F. data were computer plotted by Dataplotting Services
Inc. of Toronto, Ontario. In-phase and quadrature components are
presented in profile form on Map 2 as dashed and dotted lines
respectively. Fraser filter data are presented on the same map.
5. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS:
a) Magnetometer Data:
Over the northern, water claims (P-722864 to 722866) a generally
flat magnetic relief is characteristic. To the north of claim P-
722866 and extending into 722865, an easterly trending magnetic
high dominates the magnetic data, a relief of up to 7000 nT is
noted along this feature. In the vicinity of line 1650E, the
magnetic trend is truncated suggesting the presence of a
northwesterly trending fault (the Wakami River fault). The high
magnetic relief and steep gradients associated with this feature
would suggest an ultramafic sill on iron formation at shallow (r1
10m) depth.
The three southern claims are characterized by a pattern of
multiple, parallel magnetic highs. Steep magnetic gradients
suggest shallow depths to causative sources. A sequence of mafic
volcanic flows is suggested as the probable sources of these
responses.
-5-
b) V.L.F. DATA;
Over the three northern claims (water claims P-722864 to P-
722866), three major conductive horizons (A to C) have been
defined by the survey. The northernmost conductor (A) appears to
bifurcate within claim P-722864 and is characterized by low angle,
broad responses suggesting an overburden causative source,
probably lake bottom sediments. This overburden response appears
to be super-imposed on valid bedrock responses which are more
clearly defined in the northwest corner of the claim and to the
east of the lake shore. Two bedrock conductive horizons (B and C)
cross claims 722865 and 722866 and trend in an easterly direction.
A northwesterly conductive trend cuts the two conductors. A
northwesterly fault {the wakami River fault) may be the source of
this area of conductivity and also explains the displacements and
truncation of conductors A, B and C.
Over the three southern claims, only those responses defining
conductors E and F suggest probable bedrock causative sources.
Of the six conductive horizons defined by the survey only
conductors C and F have magnetic associations. In both cases, a
flanking magnetic expression is defined. All bedrock sources are
suggested as having graphitic or non-magnetic sulphide causative
sources.
-6-
7. CONCLUSIONS;
Detailed geological mapping is recommended in the vicinity of the
conductors to ascertain the source of the resposes.
Respectfully submitted,
i an Gnrdves
Ministry ofNaturalResources
Ontario
Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)
The Mir,... a .41010NW0ei8 3 ,6952 GREENLAW 300
Type of Survey(s)
GEOPHYSIPRT. MAH S E. MClaim Holdar(s)
492752 ONTARIO LTD
(VLF) j CCEEENLAW]^)j prospector's Licence No.
T- 1169Address
1550-609 GRANVILLE STREET, VANCOUVER B.C.Survey Company
SERVICES EXPLORATION,
Date of Survey (from 81 to) Total Miles of line Cut
ROUYN QUE. iaV | Mo2 | v?.3 | O\y \ M\2 1 ^?. 5.1Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Techmcal report) *
E. CHARTRF. . c/o SERVICES EXPLORATION, BOX 428. ROUYN QUEBEC.Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions
For first survey:
Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days
Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
r Other
Geological
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Days per Claim
2040
Days perClaim
Days per Claim
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed
Performed on Ciaim(s)
Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits
Total Expenditures
S -i- 15
Total Days Credits
=
Instructions Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.
Date
JULY 9, 1984.
Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)
Certification Verifying Report of Work
Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.
l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annex* or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.
having performed the work
Name a mi Postal Address of Person Certifying
R.C. DENOMMEE, P.O. BOX 1205
TIMMINS, ONTARIODate Certified
JULY 9, 1984.Certified by (Signature)
Ministry ofNaturalResources
Ontario
Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)
The Miningis aAct
Instructions: — Please type or print. If number of mining claims traversed
exceeds space on this form, attach a list.Not*: Only days credits calculated in the
"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.
Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Survey(s)
GEOPHYSICAL MAG AND E. M.Claim Holder(s)
NORANDA EXPLORATION COMPANY LIMITED
'Spector'! Licence No.
fl -3M3B7Address
Suite 400, 55 Yonge St. Toronto, OntarioSurvey Company
Services Exploration E.N.R.,Noranfla Que.Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)
Brian Proves . P.O.Box 1205. TJTTrmins. Ontario
Date of Survey (from fii to)
J&y l So3 , S4 j A? l
Total Miles of line Cut
2.5
Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions
For first survey:
Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days
Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Days per Claim
40
20
Days per Claim
Days per Claim
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type o* Work Performed
{Performed on Claim(s)
Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits
Total ExpendituresTotal
Days Credits
InstructionsTotal Oayt Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.
Date
June 4. 1984:Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)
Certification Verifying Report of Work
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim
Prefix
P-
.('•.t-*^. - -- '-ir,--'
*-s-". ; : *,.-
--^*'rr*~ --,^:,-^ .:3^
Number
722790
722791
722792
-
Expend. Days Cr.
h
l
1
V/y
F
R
3)
k.M?|8
Mining ClaimPrefix
ifefc'•?:*"S(~r-M-
l^*-.^-,..^ -
**(SfofAV^-'®Mbfir.''•;."ssrS."':*S-fll;-';
-•^r**r.vi""-,wiyyjjl3itf*b
ECKMHIy MU'-*-';. ' i '-
celpt No:*,- . ' '
•ORCUPINE
l®
JUN9|1P|11
Number
SLj. —————————
^/UfA"o 0' 9 '9Af
19 o~-^
O R D E D
1001984 'k^2-
WINING DIVISIONE ill [gp 884
P.MiI2il|2l s |4| 5 lf*,** i r i , 1 1 1 1 1 *ii
Expend. Days Cr.
Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.
l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexVjJierjtoC having performed the work i or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.
j Name ana Postal Address of Person Certifying
R.C. Denommee, P.O.Box 1205, Timmins, OntarioDate Certified
June 4, 1984.Certified by (Signature)
Mining Lands Section
Control Sheet
File No
TYPE OP SURVEY GEOPHYSICAL
GEOLOGICAL
GEOCHEMICAL
EXPENDITURE
MINING LANDS COMMENTS:
ure of Assessor
Date
1984 07 19 Your File: 227/84 Our F1le:2.6952
Hr. Bruce HanleyMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7
Dear Sir:
We have received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic 4 Magnetometer) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims P 722790 et al 1n the Township of Greenlaw.
This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.
Yours sincerely.
S.E. Yundt01 rectorLand Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: (416) 965-6918
S. Hurst:se
cc: Noranda Exploration Co Ltd SSulte 400 55 Yonge Street Toronto, Ontario N5E 1J4
cc: Noranda Exploration Co Ltd PP.0. Box 1205 Timmins, Ontario P4N 7J5
Ontario
Ministry of Natural Resources
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
FUe.
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type of Survey(s).
Township or Area.
Claim Holder(s)
Survey Company-
Author of Report B . GROVES
MAGNETOMETER AND V.L.F.————^—— GREENLAW
492752 ONTARIO LTD.___________1550-609 GRANVILLE ST., VANCOUVER
SERVICES EXPLORATION
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
Address of Anrt.nr -O- 1205 ' TIMMINS f ONTARIO
Covering Dates of Survey 17/12/83 tp 19/12/83.(linecutting to office)
Total Miles of Line r..t APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer.-—Radiometric———Other^——.——
DAYS per claim
2040
Geological.Geochemical.
l AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit! do not apply to airborne survey*)
Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric
DATE:.
(enter day* per claim)
/9S4 g ir.NATTTPF.
.......fc............7JMl8fi.A.(prefix)
.......E............J.2^8J5.5...........w.................
.......P.............7.2.2.8M..../...................
i**
l
of Report or Agent
SgaM
i
Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.Previous Surveys
File No. Type Date Claim Holder
TOTAL CLAIMS.
837 (5/79)
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
Ni,mher of Stations MAG. St V .L. P.;
Station interval 12 . 5m
Profile sra le lem = 10ft
372 MnmK^r of Readings MAG.
Line snacinpr 50m
•*S, V .L. P. : 372
Contour interval 200 tVT
.j instrument Geometrics G816 Proton/Scintrex MP-3 Base Stn. Maa.y Armrary — Srale constant 1 fi- T Both
Z fj Diurnal rorrertion method . Dedicated
S Base Station check- in interval (hours)Base Station location and value L.-Q r
Note : Base* Stn ontesidp srp
Uj Instrument GeoniCS E. M. -16 V.L
li Tojl ronfjgnration VERTTfAT,
^ Toil separation N/A
Q Arnirary J-%
I n s t rumen t sbase stn - Proportional Corr'n
mm ^
0+00; BQaGOyi/T
P of f?ny*aj-^rjo nf prps^nt report
p
p^ _ —— H Method: LXJ Fixed transmitter LJ Shoot back LJ In lineW Fr*.q^enry NAA Cutler ; Maine 17.8 VH*W
Parameters measured In~Phase K, Qu
Instrument
Srale constant> C C^rrertions made
^K —— Base station vain*" and lorptinn
F.levati"" armrary
Instrument
Z Method D Time Domainw H Parameters — On time^ H Off timeBJ C •^ > - Delay timer H^ o; — Integration time
Q 2g M tt""" ~ Electrode array —————————————————*- S Electrode snaring ————————————
(specify V.L.F. station) a.dra.tiir*a r!nmpon**nts nf V^rt 1*^^.1
1 i Frequency Domain FrequencyRanpre
As A Pn of T imp
—————— i
D Parallel line
4
SELF POTENTIAL
Instrument_______________________________________. Range. Survey Method ———————————————————————————————————————————
Corrections made.
RADIOMETRIC
Instrument —-——.Values measured.
.Energy windows (levels)——————.———^——————----————.————^^———-^—.Height of instrument____________________________Background Count. Size of detector^^^^—^-——————————————^.^—^——————^————-——Overburden ————-—————.————^^^—^^——-—————.-.-..—......—....——....-—
(type, depth - include outcrop map)
OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)
Type of survey-—^^^—^^^^—————————————-—^—^^—Instrument ——————-^—^—-——————————————.-————Accuracy—--^^-^^^—————-—^^-^-^^^—-^^.^^^^^-^.—---^—Parameters measured.
.Additional information (for understanding results).
AIRBORNE SURVEYS
Type of survey(s) ————————————————————————————Instrument(s) .—————————————————————————————————
(specify for each type of iiirvey)
Accuracy_________________(specify for each type of survey)
Aircraft used—^——^————————————^—^—-————^^^^—
Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.
Aircraft altitude_______________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area________________________Over claims only.
GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD
Numbers of claims from which samples taken.
Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.
(Nature of Material)
Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————
Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development- Sample Depth————— Terrain————————
Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.
ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: percent
p. p. m. p. p. b.
D Dn
Cu, Pb,
Others—
Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle)
Field Analysis (.Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——
Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. ————————
SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)
Mesh size of fraction used for analysis^—^—
Extraction Method. Analytical Method - Reagents Used——
Commercial Laboratory (.. Name of Laboratory—Extraction Method——Analytical Method ——Reagents Used————
.tests]
.tests)
-tests)
GeneraL General.
Ontario
Ministry of Natural Resources
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
File.
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type of Survey(s) MAGNETOMETER AND V.L.F______
Township or ArM GREENLAW,^—————————-——-Claim HnlH CT(s) NORANDA EXPLORATION CO. ,LTD.
SERVICES EXPLORATION, ROUYN, P. Q.
Author of Report BRIAN GROVES ___________________ Address of A,.thnr P.O. BOX 1205, TIMMINS, ONTARIO
Covering Dates of Survey 1 7/12/83 to 19/12/83.(linecutting to office)
Total Miles of Line Cut Approximately 3 miles overclaims .
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.
ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer—.—Radiometric———Other———-——-
DAYS per claim
2Q
40
Geological.Geochemical.
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit* do not apply to airborne iiirveyi)
Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter dayi per claim)
Adihof o^Report or Agenthof
iEd M
lE(KO
Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.Previous Surveys
File No. Type Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
.p...............(prefix)
p722790••••••••••T*T****************
(number)722791
722792
l
TOTAL CLAIMS. 3
837 (5/79!
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey
of Stations MAG, a V.L.F.; 360______Number of Readings MAG. S, V .L.F. ; 360
Station interval _____l? i 5lTi__________________Line spacing______^Om————^———..———Profile scale_______lcm = 1 01..^^^-—.—.^..—.----—^.—...^.—-——.——-————^^--——.—-.—-———-—-Contour interval 200 TV T
C
Instrument Geometrics G—816 Proton/Scintrex MP—3 Base S4-.n T Maq.
Accuracy — Scale constant —l -y^T Bothcorrection method Dedicated BasA ^tn— Pycmoyr-ional Prt^f'n asa Fn r\f Ti
Base Station check-in interval (hours) .———^^^.^^—^^—.^^——.^-.—-™.—.———..^.^—^^^..^— Base Station location and value T,—Q t 0+00 *
Note; Base Stn outside aTi^a of cnvta-ra^ta pf p^ggiarjt- rgport'
ELECTROMAGNETICInstrument f^apnir-g E M -16
r.n'i\ rnnfigiiration Vertical
f!ml separation N/A
Accuracy 1?.
V L F
Method: 03 Fixed transmitter FiwjHmiry NAA Cutler f Maine 17.8
Parameters measured In-PhaS6 S
—————————————— (
n Shoot back d In line d Parallel line kHz(specify V.L.F. station)
Quadrature components of Vertical secondary fie
Instrument.Scale constant.Corrections made.
Base station-value and location.
Elevation accuracy.
Z2Hg
g
WBQ
HH5H t/))-H
a
Method CD Time Domain D Frequency Domain Parameters - On time Frequency
-Off time Range ...,. __ . — ,. . ..,.— Delay time— Integration time
Power
Electrode array ~ —————————————————————————————————————— — ——————
Electrode spacing — . ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————Tvoe of electrode ———————————————————————————————— , ————————————————————— - —— —— ————————
SELF POTENTIAL
Instrument——————————————————————————————————————— Range. Survey Method ———————————————————————————————————————————
Corrections made.
RADIOMETRIC
Instrument.Values measured .
^Energy windows (levels)-—————————-———————^—^————^^-———.——....—Height of instrument.————————-——--——————^———Background Count.Size of detector-——————^—^^—^^————————^^^^————.——.-——————Overburden ^^—.^^^^^—^————————————————^^^^^^-^-———.-..—.
(type, depth — include outcrop map)
OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)
Type of survey———————————————————————————————————Instrument ———————————————————————————————————
Accuracy————————————————————————————————————Parameters measured.
.Additional information (for understanding results).
AIRBORNE SURVEYS
Type of survey(s) —^—
Instrument(s) —————(specify for each type of survey)
Accuracy—————————————————(specify for each type of survey)
Aircraft used——————————————————————————————————
Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.
Aircraft altitude_______________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area________________________Over claims only.
GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD
Numbers of claims from which samples taken.
Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.
(Nature of Material)
Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————
Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain————^———
Drainage Development-Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.
ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent D
D d
per cent p.p. m. p. p. b.
Cu, Pb,
Others—
Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)
Field Analysis (.Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——
Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. ___________
SAMPLE PREPARATION{Includes drying, screening, crushing, aihing)
Mesh size of fraction used for analysis————
Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used ——
Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory-— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used ————
.tests
.tests)
-tests)
GeneraL General.
Toom
s Tw
p. -
M,1
159
G
ro i CD
O)
o O) 13 ^ (D tft p l 00
Cun
ning
ham
Tw
p.-M
.744
O" ^
O -n Z-t
z >
C
r-05
^
^ m
2
CO?
O 1
c: XJ
O
rn
"D r Z
O 00 en
O
Xk-
o o COw*
O 3
!
it E^T
mi
o s:
-*1 !
c: i;
oO
O
D
tt
a.
z o H m t/)
m f
0
O r
sr m CD
m z D
O) n > r m z O I
CDzo o
*
^^^
^^^f
c
Prn
rn
H
I m
00
O
SL1 g'i
Z
C/)
>I "D
Ridout Lake
/-, ' IT FT T T T i ri hi
S 3 *720 , S .347BO
NDEX MAP
^*vvy;^
^ ^495-ygQg^
All readings in range of 58,000 gammas
MAGNETOMETER S URVEY
NORANDA EXPLORATION CO. LTD.
PROJECT S YL VAN/T E
Instrument Scintrex IC5S-2/MP-3
DATE JAN. 1984SURVEYED BY P.O.
DRAWN BY ; 5 M. E SCALE l * 25OO
SERVICES EXPLORATION S ERVICES
4IOI0NW00I8 2.6952 GREENLAW 210
- IQOOnN
CI
UJr
C 1 LP CJ
Oo m
LU
o in m
a LO o
LO
UJr
O LT)LO
Luc
OoOD
LLJc
Din'UD
UJc
oor-
oLOr-
UJr
O O OD
UJc
O LTJaa
UJc
OOCD
UJr
O
(NOTE: TOPS OF CONTOUR LRBELS POINT TQWflRQS T HE HIGHS]
UJ c
OCDro
O LD CO
UJ
D O
UJc
OinTT
UJc
Oo in
UJc
OinLD
UJc
O O LD
UJc
OIT) CD
UJK
Oo r-
SYLVANITE PROJECT
V.L.F. SURVEYGREENLRW TOWNSHIP
NTS 41 0/10
NORflNDR EXPLORRTION CO- LTDDflTE: FEB.1984 SCflLE: 1:2500
PROCESSED BY DflTflPLOTTING SERVICES INC-
Water Claims P722864 P722865, P722866
41010NW0016 2 .6952 GREENLAW S2O