response-spectrum

Post on 14-Dec-2014

357 views 3 download

Tags:

transcript

Prof. A. Meher PrasadProf. A. Meher Prasad

Department of Civil EngineeringDepartment of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology MadrasIndian Institute of Technology Madras

email: prasadam@iitm.ac.in

Typical Accelerograms

From Dynamics of Structures by A K Chopra, Prentice Hall

Time, sec

Response Spectrum

• If the ground moves as per the given accelerogram, what is the maximum response of a single degree of freedom (SDOF) system (of given natural period and damping)?

– Response may mean any quantity of interest, e.g., deformation, acceleration

T=2 sec,

Damping =2%

Ground motion time history

Time, sec

a(t)/g

Response Spectrum (contd…)

• Using a computer, one can calculate the response of SDOF system with time (time history of response)

• Can pick maximum response of this SDOF system (of given T and damping) from this response time history– See next slide

Time, sec

A(t)/g

Response Spectrum (contd…)

Ground motion time history

Time History of Deformation (relative displacement of mass with respect to base) response

Maximum response = 7.47 in.

T=2 sec,

Damping =2%

Time, sec

U(t)

Response Spectrum (contd…)

• Repeat this exercise for different values of natural period.

• For design, we usually need only the maximum response.

• Hence, for future use, plot maximum response versus natural period (for a given value of damping).

• Such a plot of maximum response versus natural period for a given accelerogram is called response spectrum.

Time, sec

A(t)/g

Response Spectrum (contd…)

Displacement Response Spectrum for the above time history

Time, sec

U(t)

U(t)

U(t)T=0.5 sec =2%

T=1.0 sec =2%

T=2.0 sec =2%

Um

ax

T, sec

Figure After Chopra, 2001

RESPONSE SPECTRUM – IS 1893:2002

Response Spectrum (contd…)

• Different terms used in the code:

- Design Acceleration Spectrum (clause 3.5)

– Response Spectrum (clause 3.27)

– Acceleration Response Spectrum (used in cl. 3.30)

– Design Spectrum (title of cl. 6.4)

– Structural Response Factor

– Average response acceleration coefficient (see

terminology of Sa/g on p. 11)

– Title of Fig. 2: Response Spectra for ….

Smooth Response Spectrum

• Real spectrum has somewhat irregular shape with local peaks and valleys

• For design purpose, local peaks and valleys should be ignored

– Since natural period cannot be calculated with that much accuracy.

• Hence, smooth response spectrum used for design purposes

• For developing design spectra, one also needs to consider other issues.

Smooth Response Spectrum (contd…)

Acceleration Spectra Velocity Spectra Displacement Spectra

Shown here are typical smooth spectra used in design for different values of damping (Fig. from Housner, 1970)

Period (sec)Period (sec) Period (sec)

Floor Response Spectrum

• Equipment located on a floor needs to be designed for the motion experienced by the floor.

• Hence, the procedure for equipment will be:

– Analyze the building for the ground motion.

– Obtain response of the floor.

– Express the floor response in terms of spectrum (termed as

Floor Response Spectrum)

– Design the equipment and its connections with the floor as per

Floor Response Spectrum.

Response Spectrum versus Design Spectrum

• Consider the Acceleration Response Spectrum• Notice the region of red circle marked: a slight change in natural

period can lead to large variation in maximum acceleration

Sp

ect

ral A

ccele

rati

on

, g

Undamped Natural Period T (sec)

Response Spectrum versus Design Spectrum (contd…)

• Natural period of a civil engineering structure cannot be calculated precisely

• Design specification should not very sensitive to a small change in natural period.

• Hence, design spectrum is a smooth or average shape without local peaks and valleys you see in the response spectrum

Design Spectrum

• Since some damage is expected and accepted in the structure during strong shaking, design spectrum is developed considering the overstrength, redundancy, and ductility in the structure.

• The site may be prone to shaking from large but distant earthquakes as well as from medium but nearby earthquakes: design spectrum may account for these as well.– See Fig. next slide.

Design Spectrum (contd…)

• Design Spectrum must be accompanied by:

– Load factors or permissible stresses that must be used• Different choice of load factors will give different seismic

safety to the structure

– Damping to be used in design• Variation in the value of damping used will affect the design

force.

– Method of calculation of natural period• Depending on modeling assumptions, one can get different

values of natural period.

– Type of detailing for ductility• Design force can be lowered if structure has higher ductility.

Design Spectrum (contd…)

• 1984 code provided slightly different design spectrum for two methods– Seismic Coefficient Method (static method), and– Response Spectrum Method (dynamic method)

• It was confusing to use two different sets of terminology for two methods.

• Present code provides same design spectrum irrespective of whether static or dynamic method is used.

IS:1893-1984

• Design base shear for a building by Seismic Coefficient Method was calculated as

Vb= oIKCW

• In a way, one could say that the design spectrum for the seismic coefficient method in the 1984 code was given by oIKC

Natural Period (sec)

C

IS:1893-1984 (contd…)

• In the Response Spectrum Method, the design spectrum was given by FoIK(Sa/g)

Natural Period (sec)

Sa/g

= A

vera

ge A

ccel

erat

ion

Co

effic

ient

Major Changes in Design Spectrum

• Zone Factor (Z) is specified in place of o and Fo

• Importance Factor (I) is same

• Soil Effect is considered by different shapes of response spectrum;

Soil-Foundation Factor () has now been dropped.

• Response Reduction Factor (R) used in denominator; earlier

Performance Factor (K) was used in numerator.

– For more ductile structures, K was lower.

– Now, R will be higher for more ductile structures.

• Structure Flexibility Factor (Sa/g); earlier C or Sa/g

Soil Effect

• Recorded earthquake motions show that response spectrum shape differs for different type of soil profile at the site

Period (sec)

Fig. from Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, by Kramer, 1996

Shape of Design Spectrum

• The three curves in Fig. 2 have been drawn based on general

trends of average response spectra shapes.

• In recent years, the US codes (UBC, NEHRP and IBC) have

provided more sophistication wherein the shape of design spectrum

varies from area to area depending on the ground motion

characteristics expected.

IS1893:2002

Local soil profile reflected through a different design spectrum for Rock , Soil Normalized for Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) of 1.0

Rocky or hard sites, 1 + 15 T 0.00 ≤ T ≤ 0.10Sa / g = 2.50 0.10 ≤ T ≤ 0.40 1.00 / T 0.40 ≤ T ≤ 4.00

Medium soil sites 1 + 15 T 0.00 ≤ T ≤ 0.10 Sa / g = 2.50 0.10 ≤ T ≤ 0.55 1.36 / T 0.55 ≤ T ≤ 4.00

Soft soil sites 1 + 15 T 0.00 ≤ T ≤ 0.10Sa / g = 2.50 0.10 ≤ T ≤ 0.67 1.67 / T 0.67 ≤ T ≤ 4.00

Damping percent

0 2 5 7 10 15 20 25 30

Factors

(new code)

3.2 1.4 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.55 0.50

Damping 5%

BACKGROUND

Discussed in SDOF System

This may also be viewed as the equivalent lateral static force which produces the same effects as the maximum effects by the ground shaking.

It is sometimes convenient to express Qmax in the form ,

maxQ CW (B18)

Where W = mg is the weight of the system. The quantity C is the so called lateral force coefficient, which represents the number of times the system must be capable of supporting its weight in the direction of motion.

From Eqn.B17 and B18 it follows that, C=A/g

Spectral Quantities…

(B19)

Another useful measure of the maximum deformation, U, is the pseudo velocity of the system, defined as, V = p U (B20)

The maximum strain energy stored in the spring can be expressed in terms of V as follows:

Emax = (1/2) (k U) U = (1/2) m(pU)2 = (1/2)mV2 (B21)

Under certain conditions, that we need not go into here, V is identical to ,or approximately equal to the maximum values of the relative velocity of the mass and the bays, U and the two quantities can be used interchangeably.

However this is not true in general, and care should be exercised in replacing one for the other.

Spectral Quantities…

Deformation spectra

1.Obtained from results already presented

2.Presentation of results in alternate forms

(a) In terms of U

(b) In terms of V

(c) In terms of A

3.Tripartite Logarithmic Plot

extreme right;It approaches U = y0 at extreme left; a value of ..

yA 0

It exhibits a hump on either side of the nearly horizontal central

portion;and attains maximum values of U, V and A which may be

materially greater than the values of . ..

0 0 0, ,y y and y

It is assumed that the acceleration trace of the ground motion,and

hence the associated velocity and displacement traces, are smooth

continuous functions.

The high-frequency limit of the response spectrum for discontinuous

acceleration inputs may be significantly higher than the value referred

to above,and the information presented should not be applied to such

inputs.

The effect of discontinuous acceleration inputs is considered later.

General form of spectrum

• General form of spectrum is as shown in next slide

(a) It approaches V= y0 at the extreme left; value of at the

extreme right ; it exhibits a hump on either side of the nearly

horizontal central portion; and attains maximum values of U, V and

A, which may be materially greater than the values of

respectively.

0A y

0 0 0,y y and y

(b) It is assumed that the acceleration force of the ground motion,

and hence the associated velocity and displacement

forces, are smooth continuous functions.

Generation of results

(c) The high frequency limit of the response spectrum for discontinuous

acceleration inputs may be significantly higher than the value referred

to above, and the information presented should not be applied to such

inputs.

General form of spectrum

Acceleration spectra for elastic system - El Centro Earthquake

SDF systems with 10% damping subjected to El centro record

Building Code

Natural period,secs

Bas

e sh

ear

coef

ficie

nt, C

The characteristics of the ground motion which control the deformation of SOF systems are different for different systems and excitations. The characteristics can be defined by reference to the response spectrum for the particular ground motion under consideration .

Spectral Regions

Systems the natural frequency of which corresponds to the Inclined left-hand portion of the spectrum are defined as low-frequency systems;

Systems with natural frequencies corresponding to the nearly horizontal control region will be referred to as a medium-frequency systems ; and

Systems with natural frequencies corresponding to the inclined right handed portion will be referred to as high-frequency systems.

Minor differences in these characteristics may have a significant effect on

the magnitude of the deformation induced.

Low frequency systems are displacement sensitive in the sense that their

maximum deformation is controlled by the characteristics of the

displacement trace of the ground motion and are insensitive to the

characteristics of an associated velocity and displacement trace:

Ground motions with significantly different acceleration and velocity traces out comparable displacement traces induce comparable maximum deformations in such systems.

Spectral Regions…

The boundaries of the various frequency regions are different for different excitations and, for an excitation of a particular form, they are a function of the duration of the motion.

It follows that a system of a given natural frequency may be displacement sensitive, velocity sensitive or acceleration sensitive depending on the characteristics of the excitation to which it is subjected .

Spectral Regions…

Logarithmic plot of Deformation Spectra

Advantages:

• The response spectrum can be approximated more readily and accurately in terms of all three quantities rather than in terms of a single quantity and an arithmetic plot.

• In certain regions of the spectrum the spectral deformations can more conveniently be expressed indirectly in terms of V or A rather than directly in terms of U. All these values can be read off directly from the logarithmic plot.

It is convenient to display the spectra or a log-log paper, with the abscissa representing the natural frequency of the system,f, (or some dimensionless measure of it) and the ordinate representing the pseudo velocity ,V (in a dimensional or dimensionless form).

On such a plot ,diagonal lines extending upward from left to right represent constant values of U, and diagonal lines extending downward from left to right represent constant values of A. From a single plot of this type it is thus possible to read the values of all three quantities.

0y 0y0y

V Log scale

Natural Frequency, f (Log scale)

0D0V

0A

Displacement sensitive

Velocity sensitive

Acceleration sensitive

General form of spectrum

Logarithmic plot of Deformation Spectra

U A

Deformation Spectra for Half-cycle Acceleration pulse:

This class of excitation is associated with a finite terminal velocity and with a displacement that increases linearly after the end of the pulse.

Although it is of no interest in study of ground shock and earthquakes ,being the simplest form of acceleration diagram possible ,it is desirable to investigate its effect.

When plotted on a logarithmic paper, the spectrum for the half sine acceleration pulse approaches asymptotically on the left the value.

oV y

This result follows from the following expression presented earlier for fixed base systems subjected to an impulsive force,

max

IX

mp

where 1

0

( )t

I P t dt

Letting and and noting that ( ) ( )P t m y t maxX U1

0

( )t

oy t dt y

we obtain,

oy( This result can also be determined by considering the effect of an instantaneous velocity change, ,i.e. an acceleration pulse of finite magnitude but zero duration. The response of the system in this case is given by, ( ) cos sino

o

uu t u pt pt

p

Considering that the system is initially at rest, we conclude that,

0o o ou u y and

where, ( ) sinoyu t ptp

The maximum value of u(t), without regards to signs, is

oo

yU V y

p

or )

oo

yU V y

p

or

Spectra for maximum and minimum accelerations of the mass(undamped elastic systems subjected to a Half cycle

Acceleration pulse)

Spectra for maximum and minimum acceleration of the mass(undamped Elastic systems subjected to a versed-sine

velocity pulse)

Deformation spectra for undamped elastic systems subjected to a versed-sine velocity pulse

‘B’ Level Earthquake (=10% ; μ=1.0)

Deformation spectrum for undamped Elastic systems subjected to a half-sine acceleration pulse

Example:

For a SDF undamped system with a natural frequency,f=2cps,evaluate the maximum value of the deformation,U when subjected to the half sine acceleration pulse. Assume that ,t1=0.1sec. Evaluate also the equivalent lateral force coefficient C, and the maximum spring force,Q0

ft1= 2 x 0.1 = 0.2

From the spectrum, .

0V y

0 0.5y g

Alternatively,one can start reading the value from the spectrum proceeding this may, we find that

50

0

.y

A..

..

y

A

0

Therefore..

1 0

2

...

1 00 1

0

2 2 12 0.1 9.81

21 0.1 1

9.81 0.0242 2

242 2 8 0.52

8 0.1 0.5 0.4

0.4

fU f y

U

t yy t gA fVC

g g g g g

Q CW W

Accordingly,

0

..

02 2 2 2

10.8 2 0.4

0.4

0.8 0.8 0.5 9.810.024

4 2

gAC

g g

Q W

A yU md

p pan

The value of and as read from the spectrum are

approximate. The exact value of determined is

0.7. This leads to

.

y

V

0

..

y

A

0

..

y

A

0

00.385 0.385 0.025C Q W and U

If the duration of the pulse were t1 = 0.75 sec instead of 0.1 sec , the results would be as follows

1 2 0.75 1.5

,theref e

ft

or

..

0

0

2 2 2

1.5

1.5 0.50.75

0.75

1.5 0.5 9.810.047

4 2

A

y

A gC

g g

Q W

AU m

p

If the duration of the pulse were t1,as in the first case, but the natural frequency of the system were 15 cps instead of 2 cps, the results would have been as follows: ft1=15 * 0.1=1.5

Therefore,

and

22 2

1.5 0.5 1.5 0.75

0.75

0.75 9.810.00082

4 15

A AC

y g

Q W

AU m

p

• Plot spectra for inputs considered in the illustrative example and compare

• The spectrum for the longer pulse will be shifted upward and to the left by a

factor of 0.75/0.10 = 7.5

Same as in both cases

f

V

For t1=0.75sec

For t1=0.1sec

..

0y

0y

0y

May be determined from the spectrum by interpreting as

When displayed on a logarithmic paper with the ordinate representing V and the abscissa f, this spectrum may be approximated as follows:

max

0st

x A

x y

Design Spectrum

(Log scale)

(Log scale)

1.5=

Refer to spectrum for

Note the following

• At extreme right . Explain why?

• Frequency value behind which is given by ftr= 1.5

• The peak value of A=2 x 1.6 Explain why?

In general for pulses of the same shape and duration with different peak values

• If duration on materially different

0yA

Deformation Spectra for Half-Cycle Velocity Pulses

0

0yA

0y

20

1

( )j

n

j

A y

be conservative. Improved estimate may be obtained by considering

relative durations of the individual pulses and superposing the peak

component effects.The peak value of V is about 1.6 yo

It can be shown that the absolute maximum value of the amplification

factor for a system subjected to a velocity trace of a given shape is

approximately the same as the absolute maximum value of for an

acceleration input of the same shape.

This relationship is exact when the maximum response is attained

following application of the pulse. But it is valid approximately even

when the peak responses occur in the forced vibration era.

The maximum value of U is yo and the spectrum is bounded on the left

by the diagonal line U = yo

0 0A y0 0V y

It should be clear that,

(a) The left-hand, inclined portion of the spectrum to displacement sensitive.

(b) The middle, nearly horizontal region of the spectrum is governed by the peak value of the velocity trace. It is insensitive to the shape of the pulse which can more clearly be seen in the acceleration trace.

(c) The right hand portion is clearly depended on the detailed features of the acceleration trace of the ground motion. In all cases, the limiting value of on the right is equal to .These limits appear different in the figure because of the way in which the results have been normalized.

Note that the abscissa is non-dimensionalised and the ordinate with respect to the total duration of the pulse and the ordinate with respect to the maximum ground velocity. It follows that to smaller values of corresponds to larger values of peak acceleration

1 / dt t

0y

Design spectrum for the absolute maximum deformation of systems subjected to a half cycle velocity pulse(--undamped elastic systems;continuous input acceleration functions)

Design Rules

Deformation spectra for undamped elastic systems subjected to skewed versed-sine velocity pulses

See spectrum for undamped systems, =0, on the next page

Note that:

(a) The RHS of the spectrum is as would be expected from the remarks

already made.

(b) Peak value of V is approximately 3.2 yo. This would be expected, as the velocity trace of the ground motion, has two identical pulses.

(c) At the extreme left and of the spectrum, U=y0. The system in this case is extremely flexible and the ground displacements is literally absorbed by the spring.

Deformation Spectra for Half-cycle Displacement Pulse

Design Rules

Design spectrum for maximum deformation of systems subjected to a half cycle displacement pulse

However the spectrum is no longer bounded on the left by the line U= yo, but exhibits a hump with peak value of U0 = 1.6 y0

It can be shown that the peak value of U / y0 for a system subjected to a displacement trace is approximately the same as the peak value of V / y0, induced by a velocity input of the same shape.

Further more the peak value of U occurs at the same value of the dimensionless frequency parameter, f1 as the peak value of V.

However it is necessary to interpret t1 as the duration of the displacement pulse, rather than of that of velocity pulse.

Deformation spectra for damped elastic systems subjected to a half cycle displacement pulse

Deformation spectra for full cycle Displacement pulse

(a) The part on the extreme left for which U = yo .This corresponds to

the first maximum,which occurs at approximately the instant that

y attains its first maximum.

(b) The smooth transition curve which defines the second

maximum. This maximum occurs approximately at the instant that

y(t) attains its second extremum, and is numerously greater than

the peak value of the second pulse of the contribution of the first

pulse.

(c) The hump on the left, which corresponds to the maximum that

occurs after termination of the pulse

As would be expected ,the maximum value of U in this case is

approximately 3.2 yo .Furthermore, the left hand portion of the

spectrum consists of three rather than two distinct parts:

Effect of Discontinuous Acceleration Pulses

The high frequency limit of the deformation spectrum is sensitive to whether the acceleration force of the ground motion is a continuous or discontinuous diagram.

The limiting value given priority applies only to continuous functions

The sensitivity of the high-frequency region to the detailed characteristics of the acceleration input may be appreciated by reference to the spectra given in the following these pages.

0A y

These spectra provide further confirmation to the statement made

previously to the effect that low-frequency and medium-frequency

systems are insensitive to the characteristics of the acceleration force

of the ground motion.

Explain high-frequency response to discontinuous functions.

Deformation spectra for damped elastic systems subjected to a full cycle displacement pulse

Application to Complex Ground Motions

• Compound Pulses• Earthquake Records Eureka record El-Centro record

Design SpectrumMinimum number of parameters required to characterize the design ground motionMax values ofThe predominant frequency (or deviation) of the dominant pulses in

The degree of periodicity for (the number of dominant pulses in) each diagram.Dependence of these characteristics on

Local soil conditionsEpicentral distance andSeverity of ground shaking

, and y y y, and y y y

Effect of damping:

• Effect is different in different frequency ranges

• Effect is negligible in the extremely low frequency regime (U = y0) and extreme high frequency ranges (A = y0).

u + p2u = y0(t)

low frequency u = y(t) u0 = y0

high frequency p2u = A(t) = y(t) A = y0

....

....

..

..

Eureka, California earthquake of Dec 21,1954 S 11o E component.

Eureka Quake

Elcentro ,California Earthquake of May 18,1940,N-S component

Undamped Natural Frequency, f, cps

V

p

seud

o ve

loci

tyY

c M

axim

um G

roun

d V

eloc

ity=

Further discussion of Design Response Spectra

The specification of the design spectrum by the procedure that has

been described involves the following basic steps:

1. Estimating the maximum values of the ground acceleration,

ground velocity and ground displacement. The relationship

between y0, y0, y0 is normally based on a statistical study of

existing earthquake records. In the Newmark – Blume – Kapur

paper (“Seismic Design spectra for Nuclear Power Plants”, Jr. of

Power Division, ASCE, Nov 1973, pp 287-303) the following

relationship is used.

0.3 m : 0.7 m/sec : 1g for rock

0.9 m : 1.2 m/sec : 1g for Alluvium

...

2. Estimating the maximum spectral amplification factors, αD, αV, αA ;

for the various parts of the spectrum.

Again these may be based on statistical studies of the respective

spectra corresponding to existing earthquake records.

The results will be a function not only of the damping forces of the

system but also of the cumulative probability level considered.

Damping %critical

One sigma (84.1%) Median (50%)

αD αV αA αD αV αA

0.5 3.04 3.84 5.10 2.01 2.59 3.65

1 2.73 3.38 4.38 1.82 2.31 3.21

2 2.42 2.92 3.66 1.63 2.03 2.74

3 2.24 2.64 3.24 1.52 1.86 2.46

5 2.01 2.30 2.71 1.39 1.65 2.12

7 1.85 2.08 2.36 1.29 1.51 1.89

10 1.69 1.84 1.99 1.20 1.37 1.64

20 1.38 1.37 1.26 1.01 1.08 1.17

Following are the values proposed in a recent unpublished paper by Newmark & Hall for horizontal motions:

Ground Acceleration

• Number of empirical relations available in literature to correlate shaking intensity with Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA)

• Table on next slide gives some such values.

• Notice that the table gives

– Average values of PGA; real values may be higher or lower

– There is considerable variation even in the average values

by different empirical relations.

Table

Average horizontal peak ground acceleration as a function of earthquake intensity

0.320.720.520.480.540.314IX

0.180.300.230.240.260.146VIII

0.100.130.100.120.130.068VII

0.0560.0530.0460.0610.0640.032VI

0.0320.0220.0210.0310.0320.015V

Murphy and

O’Brien, 1977

Newmann, 1977 (revised

by Murphy and O’Brien,

1977)

Trifunac and Brady, 1977 (revised by Murphy and

O’Brien, 1977)

Trifunac and Brady, 1975

Newmann, 1954

Gutenberg and

Richter, 1956

Acceleration (as a fraction of g)

 Empirical Relations

Intensity (MM Scale)

Ground Acceleration

• ZPA stands for Zero Period Acceleration. – Implies max acceleration experienced by a structure having zero

natural period (T=0).

Zero Period Acceleration

• An infinitely rigid structure

– Has zero natural period (T=0)

– Does not deform:

• No relative motion between its mass and its base

• Mass has same acceleration as of the ground

• Hence, ZPA is same as Peak Ground Acceleration

Example: Determine the response spectrum for a design earthquake with . Take and use the amplification factors given in the preceding page. Take the knee of amplified constant acceleration point of this spectrum at 8 cps and the point beyond which at 25 cps

Note: In the spectra recommended in the Newmark – Blume -Kapur paper, the line de slope upward to the left and the line of slopes further downward to the right

0A y

00.3 0.3 / sec and 0.25 ey g y m y m 0.05

Y=0.00127

A = 0.3gC = 0.3Q = 0.3W

0.22 cps

y0=0.25 m

=0.3 m/sec 2.71

2.3

2.01

=0.3g

0.3 x 2.30 = 0.69

0.3g x 2.71 =0.813 g

0.3g

0.25

x 2

.01

= 0.

5025

1.81 cps 25 cps

f

f

V

d e

0.05

0y

0y

8 cps

Design Earthquakes Describing the Earthquake

Ground Motion Time Histories

Ground motion time histories are numerical descriptions of how a certain ground motion parameter, such as acceleration, varies with time. They provide a full description of the earthquake motion, unlike response spectra, as they show duration as well as amplitude and frequency content.

They are usually expressed as plots of the ground motion parameter versus time, but consist of discrete parameter-time pairs of values.

Idealized time histories are sometimes represented by simple mathematical functions such as sine waves, but real earthquake motions are far too complex to be represented mathematically.

There are two general types of time histories:- Recorded (often referred to as historical records) - Artificial

Statistically Derived Design Spectra

The general procedure for generating statistically derived spectra is as follows:

Classes of ground motions are selected (based on soil, magnitude, distance, etc.) Response spectra for a large number of corresponding ground motions are generated and averaged

Curves are fit to match computed mean spectra

Resulting equations are used to develop a design response spectrum with desired probability of exceedence

Effect of various factors on spectral valuesSoil Conditions

For soft soils, ag remains the same or decreases relative to firm soil,but vg and dg increase, generally.

Layers of soft clay, such as the Young Bay Mud found in the San Francisco Bay area, can also act as a filter, and will amplify motion at the period close to the natural period of the soil deposit.

Layers of deep, stiff clay can also have a large effect on site response.

For more information on site effects, see Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering by Kramer. 

Effect of various factors on spectral valuesNear Fault Motions and Fault Rupture Directivity

For near-fault motions ag increases, but vg increases more dramatically due to effect of a long period pulse.

This pulse is generally most severe in the fault normal direction (as it can cause fling), but significant displacement also occurs in the fault parallel direction.

The fault parallel direction usually has much lower spectral acceleration andvelocity values than the fault normal direction.

Sample waveforms are located in a previous section of the notes, Factors Influencing Motion at a Site.

No matter the directivity, however, the motions very close to the fault rupture tend to be more severe than those located at moderate distances.

Somerville et al. have developed a relationship which converts mean spectral values generated from attenuation relationships to either the fault parallel or fault normal component of ground motion.

See the shift of the spectrum in thelong period range.

Effect of various factors on spectral valuesNear Fault Motions and Fault Rupture Directivity (Cont..)

Effect of various factors on spectral valuesViscous Damping

Friction between and with structural and non-structural elements Localized yielding due to stress concentrations and residual stresses under low loading and gross yielding under higher loads

Energy radiation through foundation

Aeroelastic damping

Viscous damping

Analytical modeling errors

                                                                                                            

Viscous Damping Values for Design

Many codes stipulate 5% viscous damping unless a more properly substantiated value can be used.

Note that actual damping values for many systems, even at higher levels of excitation are less than 5%.

Effect of various factors on spectral valuesViscous Damping

Effect of Various Factors on Spectral ValuesModifying the Viscous Damping of Spectra

Newmark and Hall's Method

For each range of the spectrum, the spectral values are multiplied by the ratio of the response amplification factor for the desired level of damping to the response amplification factor for the current level of damping.

Consider if we have a median spectrum at 5% viscous damping and we would like it at x%.

If the 5% Joyner and Boore Sv value is 60 cm/sec on the descending branch, an estimate of the 2% Sv value is 60x(2.03/1.65) = change 60x1.47 = 88 cm/sec

Role of Ductility

Elasto Plastic Force Deformation relation

Elasto Plastic system and its corresponding linear system

Design Values of normalized yield Strength

Construction of Elastic Design Spectrum

Construction of Inelastic Design Spectrum

Response of Elastoplastic system to Elcentro Ground motion

Empirically Derived Design SpectraBasic Concepts

The complexity of the previous methods, and the limited number of records available two decades ago, led many investigators to develop empirical methods for developing design spectrum from estimates of peak or effective ground motion parameters.

These relationships are based on the concept that all spectra have a

characteristic shape, which is shown here.

Empirically Derived Design SpectraNewmark and Hall's Method

N. M. Newmark and W. J. Hall's procedure for developing elastic design spectra starts with the peak values of ground acceleration, velocity, and displacement.

These values are used to generate a baseline curve that the spectrum will be generated from.

The values of peak ground acceleration and velocity should be obtained from a deterministic or probabilistic seismic hazard analysis The value of peak ground displacement is a bit more difficult to obtain due to the lack of reliable attenuation relationships.

Some empirical functions utilizing the PGA are available to provide additional estimates of the peak ground displacement.

A typical baseline curve plotted on tripartite axes is shown above.

Structural Response Amplification Factors

Structural response amplification factors are then applied to the different period-dependent regions of the baseline curve

Empirically Derived Design Spectra (Cont..)Newmark and Hall's Method

Damping(% critical)

Structural response amplification factors

Median + One Sigma

a v d a v d

1 3.21 2.31 1.82 4.38 3.38 2.73

2 2.74 2.03 1.63 3.66 2.92 2.42

3 2.46 1.86 1.52 3.24 2.64 2.24

5 2.12 1.65 1.39 2.71 2.3 2.01

7 1.89 1.51 1.29 2.36 2.08 1.85

10 1.64 1.37 1.2 1.99 1.84 1.69

20 1.17 1.08 1.01 1.26 1.37 1.38

Tripartite Plots:

Newmark and Hall's spectra are plotted on a four-way log plot called a tripartite plot.

This is made possible by the simple relation between spectral acceleration, velocity, and displacement:

Empirically Derived Design Spectra (Cont..)Newmark and Hall's Method

Sa/w = Sv = Sdw

A tripartite plot begins as a log-log plot of spectral velocity versus period as shown.

Empirically Derived Design Spectra (Cont..)Newmark and Hall's Method

Then spectral acceleration and spectral displacement axes are superimposed on the plot at 45 degree angles

All three types of spectrum (Sa vs. T, Sv vs. T, and Sd vs. T) can be plotted

as a single graph, and three spectral values for a particular period can easily

be determined.

The Sa, Sv, and Sd values for a period of 1 second are shown below.

Empirically Derived Design Spectra (Cont..)Newmark and Hall's Method

Empirically Derived Design SpectraConstructing Newmark and Hall Spectra

1. Construct ground motion 'backbone' curve using constant agmax, vgmax, dgmax lines. Take lower bound on three curves (solid line on figure)