Post on 17-Oct-2014
transcript
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov11
Electron Beam Freeform Fabrication: A Fabrication
Process that Revolutionizes Aircraft
Structural Designs and Spacecraft
Supportability
Electron Beam Freeform Fabrication: A Fabrication
Process that Revolutionizes Aircraft
Structural Designs and Spacecraft
Supportability
Robert A. Hafley
Karen M. Taminger
NASA Langley Research Center
Robert A. Hafley
Karen M. Taminger
NASA Langley Research Center
International Conference on Additive Manufacturing
7-8 July 2010
International Conference on Additive Manufacturing
7-8 July 2010
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov2
OutlineOutline
• Technology inception
• Characterization
• Technical challenges
• Current applications
• Influence on future designs
• Supportability in space
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov3
• Technology inception– Motivation– EBF3 process description– Benefits
• Characterization
• Technical challenges
• Current applications
• Influence on future designs
• Supportability in space
OutlineOutline
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov4
Metal Deposition ProcessesMetal Deposition Processes
Laser
5-10%5-10%
Continuous gated pulsed
Mirrors orfiber opticsMirrors orfiber optics
Inert gas
Powder,5-85%Powder,5-85%
0.5-9 lb/hr
Energy efficiencyEnergy
efficiency
Beam control
Beam deliveryBeam delivery
Environment
Feedstock efficiencyFeedstock efficiency
Max dep. rate
95%95%
Continuous,rastered
Magnetically steeredMagnetically steered
Vacuum
Wire, ~100%Wire, ~100%
> 30 lb/hr
E-Beam
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov5
EBF3 Core TechnologyEBF3 Core Technology
• Rapid metal fabrication process
– Layer-additive process
– No molds or tools
– Properties equivalent to wrought
– Demonstrated on Al, Ti, Ni, Fe-based alloys
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov6
• Slice CAD drawing
• E-beam creates melt pool
• Add wire to pool
• Translate layer-by-layer
EBF3 ProcessEBF3 Process
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov7
LaRC EBF3 System #1LaRC EBF3 System #1
• 42 kW gun
• 60 kV max
• 6-axis positioning
• 2m x 2.8m x 2.5m vacuum chamber
• 600mm x 1200mm x 1500mm build envelope
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov8
EBF3 DemonstrationEBF3 Demonstration
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov9
Benefits of EBF3Benefits of EBF3
• Near-net shape– Minimize scrap– Reduces part count
• Efficient designs– Lightweight– Enhanced performance
• Complex unitized components– Integral structures– Functionally graded materials
• “Green” manufacturing – Minimal waste products– Energy and feedstock efficient
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov10
EBF3 Saves ResourcesEBF3 Saves Resources
– =
3000 kg 2850 kg 150 kg
Conventional Machining:
Additive Manufacturing via EBF3:
– =
50 kg 150 kg
+
100 kg 100 kg
+ EBF3
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov11
• Technology inception
• Characterization– Microstructure– Mechanical properties
• Technical challenges
• Current applications
• Influence on future designs
• Supportability in space
OutlineOutline
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov12
Machined from plate Built by EBF3
2219 Al Microstructure2219 Al Microstructure
0.25 mm 0.25 mm
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov13
As-deposited T6 Condition
Rapid cool cast:•Cu segregation •Dendrites
Transformed:•Grain boundaries retained
2219 Al EBF3 Microstructure2219 Al EBF3 Microstructure
100 µm100 µm
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov14
2219 Al Tensile Data2219 Al Tensile Data
• EBF3 tensile properties comparable
to handbook data
0
25
50
75
Yield Ultimate Elongation
EBF3 + T62T62 typical
Ten
sil
e S
tren
gth
, ksi
0
10
Elo
ng
ati
on
, %
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov15
Ti-6Al-4V MicrostructureTi-6Al-4V Microstructure
50 µm
2 mm2 mm
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov16
Ti-6Al-4V Tensile DataTi-6Al-4V Tensile Data
• EBF3 Ti-6-4 equivalent to annealed wrought product
0
50
100
150
Yield Ultimate Elongation
As-deposited
Annealed (Wrought)
0
5
10
15
Elo
ng
ati
on
, %
Ten
sil
e S
tren
gth
, ksi
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov17
• Technology inception
• Characterization
• Technical challenges– Preferential vaporization– Process control– Residual stress
• Current applications
• Influence on future designs
• Supportability in space
OutlineOutline2219
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov18
Loss of Al in Ti-6Al-4VLoss of Al in Ti-6Al-4V
• Al loss in vacuum
• Function of temperature and pressure
• Process repeatability
• Issue with other alloys too
89.5
90.5
5.4
6.6
Ti
Al
5 mm5 mm
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov19
Need for Process ControlNeed for Process Control
• Melt pool changes with temperature
• Monitor for process control
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov20
Thermal Residual StressesThermal Residual Stresses
• Localized heat induces distortion and residual stress
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov21
• Technology inception
• Characterization
• Technical challenges
• Current applications– Replace existing parts– Enable new complex parts
• Influence on future designs
• Supportability in space
OutlineOutline
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov22
Add Details onto ForgingsAdd Details onto Forgings
• Add features onto
simplified preform
• Reduces billet sizes and
buy-to-fly ratio
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov23
Cryotank ConceptCryotank Concept
• Form cylinder
• EBF3 stiffeners
• Tailored stiffener arrays
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov24
Complex ShapesComplex Shapes
• Build entire part
• Unitized structures
• Allows internal cavities
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov25
• Technology inception
• Characterization
• Technical challenges
• Current applications
• Influence on future designs– New unitized structural designs– Functionally-graded structures– Integrated systems
• Supportability in space
OutlineOutline
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov26
Novel Structural DesignsNovel Structural Designs
Curved stiffeners can be
optimized for:
• Performance• Low weight• Low noise• Damage tolerance
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov27
Aeroelastic TailoringAeroelastic Tailoring
Coupled bending-
torsion wingMonocoque wing
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov28
Design for AcousticsDesign for Acoustics
• Optimize stiffeners to tailor natural
resonance frequencies
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov29
Functional GradientsFunctional Gradients
Lengthwise gradient
Build height gradient
Locally control:
• Chemistry
• Microstructure
• Properties
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov30
• Technology inception
• Characterization
• Technical challenges
• Current applications
• Influence on future designs
• Supportability in space– In-space repair– Spin-off applications
OutlineOutline
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov31
• Long duration
missions
• Support autonomy
• Minimize resupply
from Earth
• Fab or repair parts
• Enhances mission
success
Need for SupportabilityNeed for Supportability
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov32
Remote Terrestrial RepairsRemote Terrestrial Repairs
Similar self-supportability needs
on Earth:
• Navy ships• Army supply in-theater• Remote science bases
Robert.A.Hafley@nasa.gov33
SummarySummary
• Led by LaRC since inception
• Disruptive technology
• Cross-cutting:– Aeronautics– Space– Other industry sectors
• Enables new structural designs
• Demonstrated in 0-g for use in-space